YouTube’s copyright parasites
The dark side of the evolving economics of user-uploaded video
Topics: harlem shake, Let's Play, videogames, Gaming, Copyright, YouTube, ContentID, Technology News, Business News, Entertainment News
The evolving economics of YouTube continue to fascinate.
The monetization of user-created Harlem Shake videos by MadDecent, the label that owns the copyright to the song everyone is spazzing out to, and the YouTube music network INDMusic, is an example of how content creators and owners can make a profit in the age of unlimited sharing without resorting to threats or raging about piracy.
But TechDirt’s Tim Cushing has a report on how the same technologies employed in the case of the Harlem Shake are also being abused.
According to Cushing, gamers uploading “Let’s Play” videos — stretches of actual video gameplay captured for the entertainment of others — have been receiving bogus copyright claims from hard-to-pin-down outfits with names like Agora Aggregator and Digital Minds Entertainment.
(You may wonder why people would watch other people playing video games, rather than play them themselves. I understand your confusion. But there’s no question that this is a widespread phenomenon, something I can attest to personally, having watched my gamer son watch Let’s Play videos. The gaming companies who actually own the copyright to the content seem to have little problem with the practice — it’s free advertising.)
The claims are delivered via Google’s ContentID system, which offers copyright owners various options when a supposed violation is identified. The owner can ignore it, block it or monetize it by getting a piece of the ad revenue from commercials served along with the video.
In the case of the Let’s Play videos, if the uploader doesn’t challenge the claim, Agora Aggregator is then entitled to a piece of the revenue stream. But according to Cushing, when gamers challenged the claims, Agora Aggregator simply dropped them. The clear implication is that Agora Aggregator never had any legitimate copyright claims in the first place. It was simply a parasite capitalizing on a YouTube ecological niche that only existed because gamers were unwilling to challenge their claims, whether from ignorance or fear.
Andrew Leonard is a staff writer at Salon. On Twitter, @koxinga21. More Andrew Leonard.





Google Search Equates "Gayest" With "Worst"
The Quiet Death Of Desktop Messaging
Why Twitter's Two-Step Authentication Won't Stop Big Twitter Hacks
13 Little Things You May Have Missed About The Xbox One
6 things every CIO should know (or at least think about)
Ericsson, Nokia Siemens lay the groundwork for HetNet with new Wi-Fi technology
If Fisker goes for $20M, that’s an over 99 percent discount from its peak valuation
Google plans to bring its own voice search to the iPhone and iPad
Survey: Share your thoughts on Microsoft’s Xbox One
Comments
9 Comments