A reporter tried to take pictures of a massive new government data center in Utah. Bad idea
Kashmir Hill covers privacy issues for Forbes magazine. She does this job very well. She is, in fact, so dedicated to her beat that when she had a few hours to kill while visiting Utah she decided it would be fun to go take a look at the massive data center that the National Security Agency is building about 30 minutes south of Salt Lake City.
She took some pictures, and got in some trouble. Not too much trouble — some browbeating from NSA security officials, run-of-the-mill low-level intimidation. She ended up deleting a couple of her photographs — and then wrote a column that makes a really important point:
Officer #2, who seemed slightly older than the first but who also carried a little green notebook to record what we had to say, told us he would like for me to delete the photos, and mentioned that it would be easier if we did and that we could be charged with a crime for trespassing and for taking the photos.
Honestly, I was starting to feel pretty nervous at this point but also painfully aware of the irony of the situation. They didn’t want me to capture information about a facility that will soon be harvesting and storing massive amounts of information about American citizens, potentially including many photos they’ve privately sent.
Hill quotes a Wired magazine story on the data center from March:
The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails — parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration — an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.
It’s a building designed, in other words, to know everything there is to know about us. We, however, are not encouraged to learn anything about it.
More Related Stories
- Don't cry climate-change wolf
- Apple uses foreign companies to avoid billions in taxes
- Gitmo hunger striker launches Twitter campaign
- How to screw up Tumblr
- Yahoo shells out $1.1 billion for Tumblr
- Chinese hackers resume attacks against U.S.
- Must-see morning clip: Facial recognition software identifies "faceprints"
- Facebook "like" on trial in Virginia
- Top 5 investigative videos of the week: Nailing a dictator
- Can playing Dots on your iPhone make you smarter?
- Print your own gardening accessories
- Why green roofs never work
- New Yorker launches tool by Aaron Swartz to protect leaks
- The week in 10 pics
- Financial Times hacked by Syrian Electronic Army
- Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
- Is safe fracking possible?
- Google Glass chief: "You'll know" when someone is spying on you
- Foxconn splitting with Apple?
- U.K. hacker sentencing highlights U.S. overreach
- Taxing technology to save the arts
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 picsclose X
- 1 of 11
Credit: AP/LM Otero
Credit: AP/Matt Rourke
Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher
Credit: AP/Molly Riley
Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite
Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster
Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid
Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield
Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin
Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin
Recent Slide Shows
- 1 of 11