Uncapturing a Friedman
A "Capturing the Friedmans" subject -- who served 13 years -- could be vindicated, thanks, in part, to the director
By Daniel D'AddarioTopics: andrew jarecki, capturing the friedmans, jesse friedman, kathleen rice, allegtions of child molestation, Editor's Picks, Entertainment News
“Capturing the Friedmans,” Andrew Jarecki’s documentary about a Long Island family caught in a firestorm of sexual abuse allegations, came out in 2003, and the intervening years have not been kind to one of its subjects.
“I spent five years on parole,” said Jesse Friedman, who pleaded guilty to charges of sexual abuse of minors in order to avoid a life sentence for crimes he says he did not commit. He told Salon: “Parole was living life every day with the threat of being sent back to prison.” He had served 13 years, beginning at age 19, and had not been able to find steady employment since his 2001 release, working for a time as an electrician’s apprentice. He now supports himself by selling books online, and writes in a statement that his sex-offender status has made it difficult to find a home for him and his wife (Friedman married in 2007), and impossible to imagine having a child. Megan’s Law, he writes, “is social exile.”
Friedman’s conviction could very well be overturned — and very soon, some observers believe. And if it is, it may be largely because of the work of Jarecki, who has helped Friedman’s defense team with critical new information, including original accusers’ recanting their earlier claims. And it has been motivated in part, he says, by the impression left by his film.
“Because the film had some level of ambiguity, part of my obsession with staying engaged is about correcting the record,” he said.
Friedman’s case was reopened in 2010, when the U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals asked Nassau County District Attorney Kathleen Rice to investigate potential misconduct because of what it called “moral panic” — and concerns about the partiality of the judge, who told Jarecki’s cameras in “Capturing the Friedmans” that there “was never a doubt in my mind” about Jesse Friedman’s guilt. The 2nd Circuit saw “‘a reasonable likelihood’ that Jesse Friedman was wrongfully convicted.”
Indeed, it was the documentary’s very existence that allowed Jesse Friedman to build a case for an appeal to the 2nd Circuit Court. “I had hired three different private investigators, from prison, to go out and try to talk to people and appeal to their empathy to correct the injustice,” Friedman said. “Those efforts were futile. The filmmakers were able to come along as impartial outsiders and with some journalistic privilege and they were able to talk to people that a private investigator or attorney hired on my behalf could not.”
Friedman rejects, though, the notion that Jarecki originally had been his ally in seeking exoneration. “They were extremely independent while they were making the film. I was still incarcerated when they started working on the film,” he said. “But when we were promoting the film together, one thing led to another.”
The film focused on Jesse Friedman and his father, computer teacher Arnold Friedman, and the questionable police sting and investigation that led to their arrests. As Salon film critic Charles Taylor wrote at the time: “I don’t see how any reasonable person could watch ‘Capturing the Friedmans’ and not see it as a tale of mass hysteria and the American judicial system gone amok.” But Arnold Friedman, who died while serving out his sentence in prison in 1995, and the main target of the abuse allegations, was caught with child pornography, and admitted to having molested two young boys, and, once, his brother. (A court has not revisited the case against Arnold Friedman.)
Critics and audiences raved about the film and Jarecki’s scrupulously fair presentation of the case; it was marketed with the tag line “Who do you believe?” Now, having learned more about the case in the decade-plus since it was released, Jarecki is less ambivalent.
“Maybe the film was more ambiguous than it should have been,” he said, before correcting himself. “I don’t think the film was more ambiguous than it should have been, though: It was the film that we made based on the understanding of the information we had at the time.
“But my thinking, with respect to Jesse, has evolved. My sense of responsibility to him has increased. My sense of the relevance of the film has decreased.”
Since the film came out, Jarecki has had a busy career with other projects – which include producing “Catfish” (both the documentary and the MTV series), and directing the film “All Good Things,” starring Ryan Gosling and Kirsten Dunst. But information about Jesse Friedman’s case continued to find its way to him. “Once you make a movie about something, especially if it’s a kind of obscure subject that people have an emotional investment in,” said Jarecki, “there’s no other place for them to go with their information. The people have come to us, especially in the last two and a half years.”
Jarecki began sharing information with Jesse’s pro bono defense team in 2003, shortly after the film’s release, he said: “I tried to keep them abreast of any big developments in our investigation as we went. I didn’t think there were big areas off-limits.”
Jarecki eventually managed to track down 10 of the 14 original complainants in the Friedman case. Of those 10, four have recanted the accusations on tape, and another five would or could not affirm their earlier accusations. Only one still stood by his original accusations — accusations, he says, he only remembered through memory-recovery techniques like hypnosis. Furthermore, 11 more of the complainants’ classmates have provided affidavits or recorded statements saying the abuse, which was supposed to have happened in the open and during Arnold Friedman’s computer class, never happened in their presence. (Jarecki published snippets of the evidence assembled in the past 10 years online.)
But Jarecki isn’t concerned solely with the welfare of Friedman: “I’m equally concerned about the hundreds of people who were told by the police, falsely, that their children were attacked and falsely molested.”
“That perverts your outlook on life,” he said.
As for how and why Friedman ended up in prison, Jarecki blames the coercion of young witnesses and the judge’s certitude before having seen any evidence.
Asked to describe his level of confidence that Friedman’s name would be cleared, Jarecki said: “I try to be guardedly optimistic. The D.A. has to recognize that this case was prosecuted using techniques that should be among the top 10 things you don’t do in a sexual abuse case with young victims.”
For his part, Friedman is slightly less cautious in his optimism, saying: “In the past few weeks, the outcome has been moving from the realm of ‘When pigs fly,’ to ‘We might actually win this thing.’” But he’s nervous about what would lie beyond that. “It was 25 years of my life; I could have had a whole second life. I could have had a whole career, a wife, kids, everything! Twenty-five years is a lifetime of accomplishments. At 43, I’m still waiting to start my life. I’m waiting to start a career, a family, build community contacts and lifelong friends.”
He paraphrased something his wife had told him: “I don’t really know what it’s like to be an adult and have true freedom.”
He’s unlikely to be the subject of another film, said Jarecki, who’s working on a documentary about the wealthy real estate scion Robert Durst (the inspiration of “All Good Things”). He says he began gathering information, and videotaping interviews, purely out of a sense of justice. “But if the district attorney doesn’t see fit to do the right thing, maybe all bets are off. If that’s what’s required, I might have to start thinking about a new film.”
Daniel D'Addario is a staff reporter for Salon's entertainment section. Follow him on Twitter @DPD_ More Daniel D'Addario.
Related Stories
More Related Stories
-
New York's most persecuted subway artist?
-
James Franco: "I really felt I was in conversation with Faulkner"
-
"Jodorowsky's Dune": The sci-fi classic that never was
-
First look: A Chinese art-house director goes for blood
-
Pollution as ancient Chinese art
-
Chimp's blurry pictures to fetch six figures at auction
-
Alex Gibney: Julian Assange has become like "those he despises"
-
Can playing Dots on your iPhone make you smarter?
-
Must do's: What we like this week
-
First look: An Iranian director takes on Western morality
-
JJ Grey: I can't watch the news!
-
Stop comparing everything to "Girls"!
-
Beyoncé reportedly pregnant with second baby
-
Krist Novoselic: My plan to fix Congress, curb obstruction
-
Amy Poehler: I have no idea what makes a great comedy
-
Justin Bieber has less than 12 hours to save his monkey
-
Benedict Cumberbatch: I would marry Spock
-
First look: Sofia Coppola's chilly, brilliant "Bling Ring"
-
Must-see morning clip: George Packer on the decline of American institutions
-
"Parks and Recreation" star Jim O'Heir shops at A&F
-
"The Office's" sugar-coated finale
Featured Slide Shows
The week in 10 pics
close X- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
Lisa Montgomery embraces her nephew Thursday after a tornado tore apart her home in Cleburne, Texas. The twister killed six people and destroyed entire swaths of the North Texas town.
Credit: AP/LM Otero -
Jack McMahon, the defense attorney for abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell, speaks outside the Criminal Justice Center in Philadelphia Tuesday. His client was convicted of killing three babies in his clinic, and will serve multiple life sentences.
Credit: AP/Matt Rourke -
A photo taken Monday captures Vice President Joe Biden's response to a Milwaukee second-grader's innovative proposal to end America's epidemic of gun violence. This guy!
Credit: AP/Jenny Aicher -
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., flanked by a grouper-eyed Michele Bachmann, addresses the IRS' admission that it targeted Tea Party groups in advance of the 2012 election. In an op-ed for CNN Thursday, the Kentucky senator slammed the president for his faux outrage.
Credit: AP/Molly Riley -
Ousted IRS chief Steven Miller is sworn in on Capitol Hill Friday. Miller testified before the House Ways and Means Committee on the extra scrutiny the agency gave conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.
Credit: AP/J. Scott Applewhite -
Attorney General Eric Holder pauses as he testifies on Capitol Hill before the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday. Holder is under fire, among other things, for the Justice Department's gathering of phone records at the Associated Press.
Credit: AP/Carolyn Kaster -
O.J. Simpson sits during an evidentiary hearing at Clark County District Court in Las Vegas, Nev., Thursday. Simpson, who is currently serving a nine-to-33-year sentence in state prison for armed robbery and kidnapping, is using a writ of habeas corpus to seek a new trial.
Credit: AP/Las Vegas Review-Journal/Jeff Scheid -
Major Tom to ground control: On Sunday astronaut Chris Hadfield recorded the first music video from space, a cover of David Bowie's "Space Oddity."
Credit: AP/NASA/Chris Hadfield -
When it rains it pours. President Barack Obama speaks during a news conference Thursday with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, inexplicably inspiring an #umbrellagate Twitter meme.
Credit: AP/Jacquelyn Martin -
A smoke plume rises high above a road block at the intersection of County A and Ross Road east of Solon Springs, Wis., Tuesday. No injuries were reported, but the the wildfire caused evacuations across northwestern Wisconsin.
Credit: AP/The Duluth News-Tribune/Clint Austin -
Recent Slide Shows
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Mobile Entertainment: 9 Amazing Drive-In Movie Theaters Still Standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Thumbnails
- Fullscreen
- 1 of 11
- Previous
- Next
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Mobile Entertainment: 9 Amazing Drive-In Movie Theaters Still Standing
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Netflix's April Fools' Day categories
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
The week in 10 pics
-
Slideshow: Nerd Obama
Related Videos
Most Read
-
Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia
Andrew Leonard
-
Obstruction will ruin GOP
Jonathan Bernstein
-
Jaron Lanier: The Internet destroyed the middle class
Scott Timberg
-
Is Reddit censoring openly racist users?
Fidel Martinez, The Daily Dot
-
The man behind Abercrombie & Fitch
Benoit Denizet-Lewis
-
We're living in an Ayn Rand economy
Paul Buchheit, AlterNet
-
My "truly remarkable" cancer breakthrough
Mary Elizabeth Williams
-
When the IRS targeted liberals
Alex Seitz-Wald
-
Krist Novoselic: My plan to fix Congress, curb obstruction
Krist Novoselic
-
Will you marry me -- once you're done peeing?
Tracy Clark-Flory
Popular on Reddit
links from salon.com

62 points63 points64 points | 3 comments


Comments
16 Comments