GOP has always misled the debt debate
That the Reinhart/Rogoff study justifying austerity has been exposed as bogus should come as no surprise
Topics: On the Economy, Austerity, Reinhart, Rogoff, Herndon, Europe, Business News, Politics News
Allow me to quickly try to tie together some current events (zipping up to NYC to give this talk).
First, you’ve got the Reinhart/Rogoff (R&R) dustup which is generating lots of ink in the AMs papers—more on that in a moment. Second, indicators once again show that the ongoing expansion in American economy continues to underperform, with weak readings on jobs, retail sales, and inflation.
The connective tissue here is contractionary fiscal policy. And while no one or two individuals gets the blame for that, R&R’s work, with its arbitrary threshold (remember, they’re the ones purveying the debt/GDP-above-90%-slows-growth thesis), non-contextualized broad averages across countries, and data errors, is a good example of how economists have misled the debate.
It’s of course worse in Europe, and interestingly, today’s papers also find the IMF backing off austerity prescription a bit, based, btw, on their own empirical findings which show the countries that did the most deficit reduction had the worst growth outcomes and visa versa. But here in the US, fiscal tightening—remember the sequester—is estimated to shave about 1.5% off of our growth this year, concentrated in the second and third quarters.
It will take a lot more than a quick blog post to analyze the deeply damaging fail of economic policy makers both before and following the Great Recession. The more I learn about the R&R paper, the more I’m reminded that deference to top dogs is a big part of the problem. Many people recognized, though without the depth of Herndon et al’s new paper, that this was a bogus and arbitrary finding, averaging together (carelessly, it turns out) decades of economic apples and oranges and proclaiming their 90% rule (yes, they hedged it in some of their writings, but they didn’t in others) with virtually no accounting for key national differences, reverse causality (slow growth leading to high debt), and most importantly, the economic context for the high debt levels. Yet too few top academic economists called them on it (Krugman and Shiller were exceptions).
Jared Bernstein joined the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in May 2011 as a Senior Fellow. From 2009 to 2011, Bernstein was the Chief Economist and Economic Adviser to Vice President Joe Biden. Follow his work via Twitter at @econjared and @centeronbudget. More Jared Bernstein.





Ken Cuccinelli Once Filed An Amendment To Change Virginia's State Song To The Beatles' "Taxman"
Masters Of The Universe: Lawmakers Obsess Over Threats From Space
Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift
Comments
10 Comments