Giffords is a fighter, and NRA will be sorry
The post-Newtown gun-control movement must undo a decade of Democratic inaction on guns. And it will
Topics: Gun Control, Gabrielle Giffords, national rifle association, Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting, Newtown school shooting, Tucson shooting, Editor's Picks, News, Politics News
Gabrielle Giffords and Barack Obama, before he speaks in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, Wednesday, April 17, 2013, about measures to reduce gun violence. (Credit: AP/Manuel Balce Ceneta)Adorable red-haired Daniel Barden will live forever, but only in photographs: The 6-year-old with two eternally missing front teeth was murdered in the Sandy Hook massacre. So if his father, Mark, isn’t giving up on gun control, after losing not only his beloved son but the shameful Senate vote on background check legislation Wednesday, then nobody else is allowed to give up.
President Obama let Mark Barden introduce him before his angry Rose Garden reaction to the failure of the Manchin-Toomey compromise, and to me that signaled a new, long-term, bare-knuckled and visceral approach to the issue of guns. Barden reminded us that the motto of the gun-control group he co-founded, Newtown Promise, is, “Our hearts are broken, but our spirits are not.” That’s got to become the animating drive of a nationwide movement to fight the National Rifle Association and its allies, on every level. This defeat, however crushing and shameful, is just a beginning.
Not only Barden and Obama but Gabrielle Giffords took a shockingly hard line after the Senate vote. The former congresswoman also appeared at the Rose Garden press conference, and afterward she sent out an angry statement – she couldn’t speak at the press conference because her speech is unreliable since she was shot in the head in January 2011. I read these lines from Gifford, and I wondered about them:
Over two years ago, when I was shot point-blank in the head, the U.S. Senate chose to do nothing. Four months ago, 20 first-graders lost their lives in a brutal attack on their school, and the U.S. Senate chose to do nothing.
It’s clear to me that if members of the U.S. Senate refuse to change the laws to reduce gun violence, then we need to change the members of the U.S. Senate.
“When I was shot point-blank in the head.” I winced at those words. But Giffords was even more brutal in a New York Times Op-Ed that went up Wednesday night.
Some of the senators who voted no have also looked into my eyes as I talked about my experience being shot in the head at point-blank range in suburban Tucson two years ago, and expressed sympathy for the 18 other people shot besides me, 6 of whom died … And still these senators decided to do nothing. Shame on them ….
Speaking is physically difficult for me. But my feelings are clear: I’m furious. I will not rest until we have righted the wrong these senators have done, and until we have changed our laws so we can look parents in the face and say: We are trying to keep your children safe.
Joan Walsh is Salon's editor at large and the author of "What's the Matter With White People: Finding Our Way in the Next America." More Joan Walsh.




Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift
United Nations Says $22,000 Internship Up For Auction Isn't Legitimate
National Review Photoshops Grover Norquist Out Of Marco Rubio Cover

Comments
137 Comments