How sincere is Democrats’ new commitment to gay rights?
While the right cries amnesty over the immigration bill, the left should be protesting its exclusion of gay couples
Topics: Immigration, Immigration Reform, gang of eight, Marco Rubio, Chuck Schumer, Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt., Barack Obama, Jay Carney, News, Politics News
Dick Durbin, Chuck Schumer, Dianne Feinstein (Credit: Jeff Malet, maletphoto.com/Reuters/Hyungwon Kang)When President Barack Obama first introduced his principles for immigration reform a little over two months ago, one notable point of differentiation from the Senate’s framework was that he chose to include same-sex couples and their kids in his plan.
As Stephen Colbert noted on “The Colbert Report,” the president’s plan said it would treat “same-sex families as families.”
“What’s next, Mr. President,” Colbert jested, “treating gay people as people?”
But now that the Senate’s Gang of Eight has introduced its immigration bill and it notably excludes the provision that would allow U.S. citizens to sponsor their same-sex partners for residency, the White House appears to be wavering.
When asked last week whether the president was willing to “let that provision go” at a White House briefing, press secretary Jay Carney responded, “It is certainly the case, as the president said in his statement, that not everything in the bill reflects how he would write it, but it broadly is consistent with his principles.”
Pressed further about whether President Obama would sign the bill in its current form, Carney countered, “Have you ever seen a bill of this size go from inception to a president’s desk unaltered? So we’ll see where this goes.”
Hmm … We’ll see? For those of us who have been closely tracking the issue (and I’m not a passive observer here — I consult for Immigration Equality on the matter of equalizing treatment for same-sex binational couples), it looked like a softening of the incredibly strong and consistent positioning the White House presented a couple of months ago.
Here’s Carney in January: “The president believes that [the provision for same-sex couples] should be included and that should come as no surprise … the president has long believed that Americans with same-sex partners from other countries should not be faced with the painful choice between staying with the person they love or staying in the country they love.”
And White House senior advisor Dan Pfeiffer said several days later: “The president in his plan said that you should treat same-sex families the same way we treat heterosexual families. It’s wrong to discriminate.”
Kerry Eleveld is a freelance writer, consultant and former White House correspondent for The Advocate. More Kerry Eleveld.




Ken Cuccinelli Once Filed An Amendment To Change Virginia's State Song To The Beatles' "Taxman"
Masters Of The Universe: Lawmakers Obsess Over Threats From Space
Commerce Appointment Opens A New White House Rift

Comments
17 Comments