How IRS scandal could help Karl Rove and dark money
Advocates had hoped IRS would clarify its rules on Rove style groups, but now that may be politically impossible
Topics: IRS, Social welfare, Dark Money, Campaign Finance, Campaign Finance Reform, nonprofits, Elections News, Business News, Politics News
After an election in which hundreds of millions of dollars were funneled through “dark money” nonprofit groups by people like Karl Rove, campaign finance advocates fear the nascent IRS scandal involving these very organizations will make the already difficult task of regulating them nearly impossible.
Organized under section 501(c)4 of the tax code, organizations like Rove’s Crossroads GPS are social welfare organizations that are legally barred from making politics their “primary purpose” — at least in theory. In practice, many of these groups are plainly political, but the IRS has never defined what differentiates an improper political group from a bona fide social welfare group, so they’ve been able to flout the intent of the law with impunity. With growing public awareness after the 2012 election, campaign finance reform advocates thought they may be able to finally get the IRS or Congress to impose some new rules. But scandal may blow all of that up.
“The IRS is not really in a position right now to rewrite the rules that apply to social welfare organizations. And it’s not going to be the right time for that for at least a little while,” Lisa Rosenberg, a government affairs lobbyist at the Sunlight Foundation, told Salon. “Everything they do now, at least in the near future, is going to be glossed with this taint of impropriety.”
On Friday, the IRS apologized for targeting conservative 501(c)4 nonprofit organizations for extra scrutiny in recent years, prompting outrage from the right and an apology from President Obama himself.
Already, the scandal’s impact on campaign finance reform is apparent. This afternoon, Democratic Sen. Carl Levin, who in March vowed “to go after” these groups, delayed indefinitely a hearing planned for June. Outside of the IRS itself, Levin’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was the best hope in town for regulating these groups, which enjoy tax-exempt status and don’t have to disclose their donors.
“I think it makes it really hard to go after these groups,” said Adam Smith, a spokesperson for the Public Campaign, in an email to Salon. “Conservatives will immediately claim bias at anything, even if there is plenty of evidence.”
Alex Seitz-Wald is Salon's political reporter. Email him at aseitz-wald@salon.com, and follow him on Twitter @aseitzwald. More Alex Seitz-Wald.










Comments
6 Comments