Republicans think they’re winning the abortion wars now
Their latest charade -- a proposed 20-week national abortion ban -- will never pass. But it reveals so much
Topics: Editor's Picks, Abortion, antiabortion, Kermit Gosnell, Republicans, U.S. House of Representatives, women, Women's Health, Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock, Politics News
The federal abortion wars are back this week, as the House of Representatives votes on a national ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy, that is highly unlikely to become law. It’s a charade, one that turns women’s lives into ritualistic political football, and that will never pass muster either at the hands of the Senate, the president or, judging by precedent, the federal courts. But thanks to the upheavals of the past year, it matters a lot, because each side believes it has a newly formed political advantage on the issue: Democrats because Republicans have trouble with women voters and can’t stop talking about rape, Republicans because later abortions are unpopular and because of Kermit Gosnell.
Until recently, you could have reasonably thought House Republicans had declared a temporary cease-fire on the barrage of bills limiting access to birth control and abortion. Even before the trouncing of Todd Akin — native son of this very uterus-concerned House — and Richard Mourdock, John Boehner had set up a 20-week abortion ban for the District of Columbia to fail, with a two-thirds vote threshold.
But last week, Boehner was asked what the point is of passing a bill in the House — this time, with a national scope — that will never become law. (The question was about abortion, but it could have been about just about anything passed in his House.) Boehner replied, “Listen, jobs continues to be our number one concern, and while we continue to be focused on this, there are other important issues that we have to deal with. After the Kermit Gosnell case and the publicity that it received, I think the legislation is appropriate, and I hope those who have voted against such proposals in the past will change their minds.”
In other words, circumstances have changed, or at least Boehner has managed to be convinced by the restive base that they have. Over the weekend, former Rep. Marilyn Musgrave of the Susan B. Anthony List was crowing, “This is a time for the pro-life movement like we have not had in decades.”
The same day as Boehner’s remarks, conservative reporter John McCormack also invoked Gosnell, trying to goad Nancy Pelosi into saying what the difference was between what Gosnell was accused of and what Trent Franks’ bill bans.
Irin Carmon is a staff writer for Salon. Follow her on Twitter at @irincarmon or email her at icarmon@salon.com. More Irin Carmon.








Comments
56 Comments