Carnival Agrees To Spend $180 Million To Reduce Ship Pollution

It comes following demands from the EPA

Topics: Carnaval, Environment, Pollution, EPA, ,

Carnival Agrees To Spend $180 Million To Reduce Ship PollutionThe Carnival Triumph cruise ship is towed toward the dock as spectators watch at the port of Mobile, Ala. (Credit: Reuters)

Carnival Corp., the world’s largest cruise operator, agreed to spend $180 million to cut sulfur emissions from 32 ships, bowing to demands by the Environmental Protection Agency to clean up pollution it causes near ports.
Under the agreement with the EPA, announced today by Carnival and the agency, the company will to install scrubbers and diesel particulate filters on its ships to cut pollutants that can exacerbate smog or discharge microscopic particles dangerous to humans’ lungs.
“We have developed a breakthrough solution for cleaner air that will set a new course in environmental protection for years to come,” Carnival Chief Executive Officer Arnold Donald said in a statement.
Regulators are seeking to reduce emissions from vessels, including cruise ships, that the EPA says are significant contributors to air pollution at ports. Standards developed by the U.S., Canadian and European governments imposed a 1 percent cap on sulfur in diesel used by ships in a 200-mile zone near the U.S. shore as of last year, and a 0.1 percent cap by 2015. The cruise industry complained that enough low-sulfur fuel might not be available by 2015, which could raise their costs.
Carnival, based in Miami, will scrub the emissions instead of using lower-sulfur fuel, with a deadline of mid-2016 to install the equipment on all 32 ships, which primarily serve North American markets. That will help the company head off higher fuel costs, the company said in its statement.
Carnival runs 102 ships under 10 different brands, including Princess, Holland America, Costa and Cunard, and said it would “explore the possibility” of adding the scrubber technology to other ships.
“This is clearly a mixed bag, because it will mean dirtier air in the short term, with the potential for cleaner air down the road,” Frank O’Donnell, president of the Clean Air Watch, said in an interview.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 11
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    jkrebs04, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 1

    Niagara Falls, U.S./Canada

    akvarog, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 2

    Sydney Opera House, Sydney, Australia

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 3

    Mount Rushmore, South Dakota, U.S.

    jhgraphicsusa, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 4

    Eiffel Tower, Paris, France

    Robert R., DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 5

    Colosseum, Rome, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 6

    Taj Mahal, Agra, India

    Sergio Coelho, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 7

    Siena Cathedral, Siena, Italy

    Anythingoes, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 8

    Christ the Redeemer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    iMAGICations,DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 9

    Arc de Triomphe, Paris, France

    iMAGICations, DesignCrowd.com

    Cities without landmarks

    Slide 10

    Lost City of Petra, Jordan

  • Recent Slide Shows

Comments

Loading Comments...