The Ryan-Murray budget deal: The right reacts

Paul Ryan's budget deal gets a hostile reaction from the GOP base -- and those looking to win its favor for 2016

Topics: Paul Ryan, Matt Bevin, Tom Coburn, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Todd Cefaratti, the daily caller, mediaite, Morning Joe, The Wall Street Journal,

The Ryan-Murray budget deal: The right reactsU.S. Congressman Paul Ryan (R-WI) (Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton)

While the budget deal announced Tuesday night by Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray isn’t being met with much enthusiasm on the left (Salon’s David Dayen explains here why it’s a kick in the teeth to federal workers), the response from the right-wing grass roots has been downright apoplectic. Despite the deal getting the OK from members of the conservative establishment like the Wall Street Journal, who calls it “a least bad budget deal,” the GOP base — and those Republican politicians looking forward to 2016 — rejects Ryan’s plan for being insufficiently conservative.

Among the grass roots, the deal is being strongly panned. “If Paul Ryan puts his name to any plan that takes away the sequester, the most effective mechanism we’ve had in the past decade to actually cut spending, he can kiss goodbye any chances of running for president in 2016,” said Todd Cefaratti, the founder of Tea Party group, according to the Daily Caller.

“This is a suicide mission for the Republicans,” Cefaratti continued. “After last year’s epic New Year’s Eve cave, Republicans are now contemplating another. They’ve fallen for the media spin that conservatives trying to cut spending are the problem in Washington.”

In Kentucky, meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s Tea Party-backed challenger, Matt Bevin, slammed the deal, saying, “Allowing Washington to continue its reckless spending today, with hopes of being responsible tomorrow, is a fool’s game. We must stop mortgaging the futures of our children because career politicians are unwilling to stop spending borrowed money.”

“We deserve better,” Bevin added.

Sen. Rand Paul, positioning himself as always for a presidential run, also announced his opposition to the deal, calling it “a huge mistake to trade sequester cuts now, for the promise of cuts later.” He described the plan as yet another example of Washington’s propensity to say, “I’ll gladly pay you Tuesday for a hamburger today.” Despite Paul Ryan’s insistence that the deal does not raise taxes, Paul says it’s “shameful” to “support a budget that raises taxes and never balances [the budget].”

Paul wasn’t the only Republican senator to distance himself from Ryan’s plan, either.

Appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” Oklahoma Sen. Tom Coburn expressed his displeasure with the budget proposal, saying Ryan has “led to make a compromise that sells out what actually needs to be done.” When GOP operative Nicole Wallace responded in surprise that Coburn had effectively called Ryan a sellout, the Oklahoman rejected the characterization while nevertheless saying that, in the deal, Republicans “gave up core values.”

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio — who, like Paul, many suspect is planning to run for president in 2016 — also announced his opposition to the Ryan-Murray plan. “We need a government with less debt and an economy with more good-paying jobs, and this budget fails to accomplish both goals, making it harder for more Americans to achieve the American dream,” Rubio said in a statement. “Instead, this budget continues Washington’s irresponsible budgeting decisions by spending more money than the government takes in and placing additional financial burdens on everyday Americans.”

Judging by the response of the grass roots, and those with their finger on the grass roots’ pulse, when Paul Ryan tries to rally Republicans in support of the deal, he’ll have his work cut out for him.

Elias Isquith

Elias Isquith is an assistant editor at Salon, focusing on politics. Follow him on Twitter at @eliasisquith, and email him at

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows


Loading Comments...