Vouchers’ secret bigotry: How your tax dollars fund anti-LGBT hate

Outraged when you read about a school firing a gay teacher or expelling a gay student? You may be paying for it

Topics: anti-lgbt discrimination, Gay Rights, LGBT Rights, private schools, religious schools, Religion, Vouchers, Editor's Picks, , ,

Vouchers' secret bigotry: How your tax dollars fund anti-LGBT hate (Credit: plherrera via iStock)

This is the pattern: Every few weeks or so, a news story appears about an LGBT teacher who was fired by a religious school because of his or her sexuality, or a private school is exposed for having an explicit policy of rejecting LGBT students and families. Progressive news sites (like this one) circulate these stories with considerable and justified outrage, but all too often the story stops there — with strongly registered disappointment that private schools are legally empowered to discriminate against people because of who they are. Time passes, these cases recede into the white noise of the news cycle; rinse, repeat.

There is no doubt that what these schools do to LGBT faculty and students is despicable, but what’s often absent from the coverage of these cases is the fact that, in many states across the country, taxpayers are subsidizing their anti-LGBT agenda through state-sponsored voucher programs.

The connection between public dollars and the discrimination of private religious schools became abundantly clear last month when news broke that a Christian school in North Carolina with a “biblical morality code” — which, among other provisions, banned LGBT students or children from LGBT families from enrolling — was eligible for the state’s newly introduced, taxpayer-subsidized voucher program.

After receiving considerable scrutiny from the media, Democratic lawmakers in the state Legislature and members of the Wilmington community, Myrtle Grove Christian School announced on Tuesday that — while it will continue to discriminate against LGBT students and families — it will not accept vouchers from the state. This is good news for North Carolina taxpayers, but the (partial) attrition of one school is not nearly sufficient to ensure that the public isn’t paying for anti-LGBT hate.

The taxpayer link to schools with anti-LGBT policies was similarly highlighted by Rolling Stone in a recent piece on the public money being funneled to such schools in Georgia. But the problem with the “name and shame” process of demanding transparency and accountability after an egregious incident of discrimination is publicly exposed is that not all institutions make these policies quite so explicit. Many similar stories just fall through the cracks, or take place quietly through hiring and enrollment practices. As a result, schools’ anti-LGBT biases, whether stated directly in charters or practiced by officials through employment and admissions, can continue unchecked.

It’s a problem Wisconsin state Rep. Christine Sinicki has been facing for more than a decade spent pushing for greater accountability and transparency in her state’s voucher program. “I have been fighting this for 15 years, drafting legislation calling for these schools to come under open records and open reading policies, but to this day we have not been able to get anything passed on this,” she told Salon. “We have a real hard time even tracking what’s going on in these schools.”

Wisconsin is one of around 20 states with similar programs that divert taxpayer funds away from public education to private and primarily religious schools. And, like Wisconsin, many of these states have Republican-controlled legislatures. As Sinicki noted, a number of her conservative colleagues in the state House of Representatives are Tea Party-affiliated lawmakers with extreme privatization agendas to match their extreme anti-LGBT views.

Which is precisely why it’s so crucial to ensure that religious schools receiving public subsidies comply with the same anti-discrimination laws that govern public schools. And why connecting the issues of America’s troubling trend of privatization in education and widespread discrimination against LGBT kids and adults is so important as well.

“Whatever one thinks about vouchers, they are ostensibly supposed to be about providing opportunities for families who can’t afford to place their children in a higher-performing school or don’t have access to a higher-performing school in their district,” Eliza Byard, executive director of the Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network, told Salon. “In the end, cases like what we just saw in North Carolina show why these programs don’t really represent a full spectrum of choice for all families.”

The false promise of this privatization scheme can’t be separated from these discriminatory practices against LGBT students and families.

“Our most valued public institutions are currently being undermined by a very focused and determined set of opponents. We need public things — education, transportation — and we need these things to work well.”

And what happened in North Carolina, far from being an isolated incident, is likely a harbinger of more to come if these voucher programs continue unchecked, she added. “I hope it serves as a wakeup call.”

Katie McDonough is an assistant editor for Salon, focusing on lifestyle. Follow her on Twitter @kmcdonovgh or email her at kmcdonough@salon.com.

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 10
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Bet Me" by Jennifer Crusie

    A contemporary romantic comedy set to Elvis Costello and lots of luxurious and sinful sugary treats.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Welcome to Temptation" by Jennifer Crusie

    Another of Crusie's romantic comedies, this one in the shadow of an ostentatiously phallic water tower.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "A Gentleman Undone" by Cecilia Grant

    A Regency romance with beautifully broken people and some seriously steamy sex.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Black Silk" by Judith Ivory

    A beautifully written, exquisitely slow-building Regency; the plot is centered on a box with some very curious images, as Edward Gorey might say.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "For My Lady's Heart" by Laura Kinsale

    A medieval romance, the period piece functions much like a dystopia, with the courageous lady and noble knight struggling to find happiness despite the authoritarian society.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Sweet Disorder" by Rose Lerner

    A Regency that uses the limitations on women of the time to good effect; the main character is poor and needs to sell her vote ... or rather her husband's vote. But to sell it, she needs to get a husband first ...   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Frenemy of the People" by Nora Olsen

    Clarissa is sitting at an awards banquet when she suddenly realizes she likes pictures of Kimye for both Kim and Kanye and she is totally bi. So she texts to all her friends, "I am totally bi!" Drama and romance ensue ... but not quite with who she expects. I got an advanced copy of this YA lesbian romance, and I’d urge folks to reserve a copy; it’s a delight.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "The Slightest Provocation" by Pam Rosenthal

    A separated couple works to reconcile against a background of political intrigue; sort of "His Gal Friday" as a spy novel set in the Regency.   Read the whole essay.

    Romance novels need a canon

    "Again" by Kathleen Gilles Seidel

    Set among workers on a period soap opera, it manages to be contemporary and historical both at the same time.   Read the whole essay.

  • Recent Slide Shows


Loading Comments...