GOP’s purple-state problem: How a Virginia Medicaid battle augurs huge risks for the party

The big test for Republicans: Can they really stay opposed to Medicaid expansion -- and still survive politically? VIDEO

Topics: Video, Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, Medicaid, purple state, Obamacare, Medicaid expansion, Editor's Picks, 2014 elections, GOP, The Right, ,

GOP's purple-state problem: How a Virginia Medicaid battle augurs huge risks for the party

Ordinarily I’d never recommend reading an editorial from the Washington Times, but earlier this week the largely unread ultraconservative newspaper gave the Virginia GOP an enthusiastic thumbs-up for obstructing the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare, and in doing so helped expose the moral bankruptcy that animates much of the opposition to the health law.

“With the U.S. Treasury $17.5 trillion in debt already,” the Times opined, “even the federal leviathan can’t keep paying those handouts forever. A state that expands eligibility now will be eventually be stuck paying in full for those new enrollees.”

Right now there are some 400,000 Virginians who are too poor to purchase plans through the Affordable Care Act, but make too much money to qualify for Medicaid. This coverage gap – made possible by the Supreme Court’s decision to make the Medicaid expansion voluntary – would be closed if Virginia agreed to accept federal funds to cover the cost of expanding the program. The Times is arguing is that Virginia can’t risk covering those people now because there’s a chance the state might not be able to pay for that coverage later. In other words: it’s better for them to keep suffering than to put their faith in the federal government.

That’s a twisted rationale. Even if by some chance the feds were to find themselves unable to finance Medicaid payments for Virginia some time down the road, surely a few years of medical coverage is preferable to the continued uncertainty of the Medicaid coverage gap. But that’s the position the Virginia Republican Party has adopted, and its resistance to expanded coverage under the Affordable Care Act will be an interesting test case in an election year in which Obamacare politics will play a central role.

Generally speaking, the politics of Medicaid in Virginia favor the Democrats. Gov. Terry McAuliffe ran on the issue and won. Various polls have shown support for expansion, even from Republicans. The Virginia Chamber of Commerce supports a “private option” plan to expand Medicaid, wherein federal funds would be used to purchase private insurance plans for eligible residents. Hospitals in districts represented by Republicans, facing budgets that already can’t handle the demand for healthcare from the poor and uninsured, are begging them to take the money.

The Virginia GOP, however, is unmoved, and is ready to risk a shutdown of the state government unless Democrats strip language approving the expansion from the state budget. The Republicans’ obdurate stance is backed by anti-tax and tea party groups like Americans for Tax Reform and Americans for Prosperity, as well as Ed Gillespie, the longtime establishment Republican who will likely challenge Sen. Mark Warner this November. AFP is currently running ads in Virginia exhorting viewers to tell McAuliffe that “Virginia needs a budget, not Obamacare’s Medicaid expansion.”

This is exactly what Koch-funded groups like AFP want to see: Republicans in states that rejected the Medicaid expansion bravely holding the line against creeping big government socialist tyranny. AFP has made clear that it will not tolerate any federal Medicaid dollars going into any state (Arkansas has its own Medicaid “private option” that AFP opposes) and the group has already announced that it will actively campaign against state Republicans who waver in their opposition.

Virginia, as a purple state with a pro-Obamacare Democratic incumbent senator up for reelection, will be a test of the Koch machine’s clout. Can they keep the state Republicans in the anti-Medicaid expansion camp? And can they turn that position into a winning issue at the ballot box?

That’s a big question, not just in Virginia but in other states grappling with expanding Medicaid. Arkansas, which, remember, cobbled together its own compromise plan for Medicaid, also has a competitive Senate race between Rep. Tom Cotton (R) and incumbent Democrat Mark Pryor. Cotton backs full repeal of the Affordable Care Act, but is stubbornly refusing to take a position on Arkansas’ “private option” for Medicaid. The likely explanation for Cotton’s dance around the issue is that if he were to call for its demise, he’d be stating explicitly that he wants to deprive 100,000 Arkansas residents of their newly obtained health coverage.

The moral component to the Medicaid expansion is ultimately going to drive the politics surrounding it. Virginia Republicans provide one moral extreme: distrust of the federal government outweighs concern for the uninsured. President Obama provided the other at his press briefing yesterday announcing the new Obamacare enrollment numbers:

This does frustrate me. States that have chosen not to expand Medicaid for no other reason than political spite. You’ve got 5 million people who could be having health insurance right now at no cost to these states – zero cost to these states – other than ideological reasons they have chosen not to provide health insurance for their citizens. That’s wrong. It should stop. Those folks should be able to get health insurance like everybody else.

Right now it’s hard to see how the GOP comes out on top here. Either they stick to their guns and explain over and over why they’re denying coverage to the uninsured poor, or they cave and risk the ire of deep-pocketed small government zealots.

Simon Maloy

Simon Maloy is Salon's political writer. Email him at Follow him on Twitter at @SimonMaloy.

More Related Stories

Featured Slide Shows

  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • 1 of 7
  • Close
  • Fullscreen
  • Thumbnails
    AP/Jae C. Hong

    Your summer in extreme weather

    California drought

    Since May, California has faced a historic drought, resulting in the loss of 63 trillion gallons of water. 95.4 percent of the state is now experiencing "severe" drought conditions, which is only a marginal improvement from 97.5 percent last week.

    A recent study published in the journal Science found that the Earth has actually risen about 0.16 inches in the past 18 months because of the extreme loss of groundwater. The drought is particularly devastating for California's enormous agriculture industry and will cost the state $2.2 billion this year, cutting over 17,000 jobs in the process.


    Meteorologists blame the drought on a large zone (almost 4 miles high and 2,000 miles long) of high pressure in the atmosphere off the West Coast which blocks Pacific winter storms from reaching land. High pressure zones come and go, but this one has been stationary since December 2012.

    Darin Epperly

    Your summer in extreme weather

    Great Plains tornadoes

    From June 16-18 this year, the Midwest was slammed by a series of four tornadoes, all ranking as category EF4--meaning the winds reached up to 200 miles per hour. An unlucky town called Pilger in Nebraska was hit especially hard, suffering through twin tornadoes, an extreme event that may only occur every few decades. The two that swept through the town killed two people, injured 16 and demolished as many as 50 homes.   

    "It was terribly wide," local resident Marianne Pesotta said to CNN affiliate KETV-TV. "I drove east [to escape]. I could see how bad it was. I had to get out of there."   

    But atmospheric scientist Jeff Weber cautions against connecting these events with climate change. "This is not a climate signal," he said in an interview with NBC News. "This is a meteorological signal."

    AP/Detroit News, David Coates

    Your summer in extreme weather

    Michigan flooding

    On Aug. 11, Detroit's wettest day in 89 years -- with rainfall at 4.57 inches -- resulted in the flooding of at least five major freeways, leading to three deaths, more than 1,000 cars being abandoned on the road and thousands of ruined basements. Gov. Rick Snyder declared it a disaster. It took officials two full days to clear the roads. Weeks later, FEMA is finally set to begin assessing damage.   

    Heavy rainfall events are becoming more and more common, and some scientists have attributed the trend to climate change, since the atmosphere can hold more moisture at higher temperatures. Mashable's Andrew Freedman wrote on the increasing incidence of this type of weather: "This means that storms, from localized thunderstorms to massive hurricanes, have more energy to work with, and are able to wring out greater amounts of rain or snow in heavy bursts. In general, more precipitation is now coming in shorter, heavier bursts compared to a few decades ago, and this is putting strain on urban infrastructure such as sewer systems that are unable to handle such sudden influxes of water."

    AP/The Fresno Bee, Eric Paul Zamora

    Your summer in extreme weather

    Yosemite wildfires

    An extreme wildfire burning near Yosemite National Park forced authorities to evacuate 13,000 nearby residents, while the Madera County sheriff declared a local emergency. The summer has been marked by several wildfires due to California's extreme drought, which causes vegetation to become perfect kindling.   

    Surprisingly, however, firefighters have done an admirable job containing the blazes. According to the L.A. Times, firefighters with the state's Department of Forestry and Fire Protection have fought over 4,000 fires so far in 2014 -- an increase of over 500 fires from the same time in 2013.

    Reuters/Eugene Tanner

    Your summer in extreme weather

    Hawaii hurricanes

    Hurricane Iselle was set to be the first hurricane to make landfall in Hawaii in 22 years. It was downgraded to a tropical storm and didn't end up being nearly as disastrous as it could have been, but it still managed to essentially shut down the entire state for a day, as businesses and residents hunkered down in preparation, with many boarding up their windows to guard against strong gusts. The storm resulted in downed trees, 21,000 people out of power and a number of damaged homes.

    Debbie Arita, a local from the Big Island described her experience: "We could hear the wind howling through the doors. The light poles in the parking lot were bobbing up and down with all the wind and rain."


    Your summer in extreme weather

    Florida red tide

    A major red tide bloom can reach more than 100 miles along the coast and around 30 miles offshore. Although you can't really see it in the above photo, the effects are devastating for wildlife. This summer, Florida was hit by an enormous, lingering red tide, also known as a harmful algae bloom (HAB), which occurs when algae grow out of control. HABs are toxic to fish, crabs, octopuses and other sea creatures, and this one resulted in the death of thousands of fish. When the HAB gets close enough to shore, it can also have an effect on air quality, making it harder for people to breathe.   

    The HAB is currently closest to land near Pinellas County in the Gulf of Mexico, where it is 5-10 miles offshore.

  • Recent Slide Shows


Loading Comments...