<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > #039;Hehir</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/039hehir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Road Trip&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/19/road_trip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/19/road_trip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/05/19/road_trip</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As long as this lewd, crude, plotless wonder keeps careening along the open highway, it&#039;s all good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Y</b>o. Wazzup? Wah-ZZUHP? ZAHHH! Make some noise for "Road Trip!" Hoo! Hoo! Hoo! Free money. Show me some love. I got nothin' but love. How y'all doin' tonight? Give it up for "Road Trip." Are you in or are you out?</p><p>That pretty much covers the range of appropriate responses to "Road Trip," a compact little collegiate farce that packs a haphazard assortment of cheerful gags and boyish horny-toad adventures into its modest frame. It certainly doesn't match the genre-establishing status of "National Lampoon's Animal House" or the giddy originality of <a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1998/07/cov_17review.html">"There's Something About Mary."</a> But like last year's <a href="/ent/movies/review/1999/07/09/pie/index.html">"American Pie,"</a> "Road Trip" crisply delivers the goods: vaguely rakish heroes, vaguely kinky sex and highly naked nubiles. Also a little song, a little dance, some French toast down a fat guy's pants. Multiplexes should be thronged with howling, high-fiving young men deep into summer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/19/road_trip/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/19/road_trip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Battlefield Earth&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/12/battlefield_earth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/12/battlefield_earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/05/12/battlefield_earth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[L. Ron Hubbard&#039;s pulp sci-fi classic comes incomprehensibly to the screen  starring Scientologist John Travolta.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he first thing to talk about with "Battlefield Earth" is not the subliminal messages allegedly sneaked in by the Church of Scientology. (If they're there, they don't work.) Nor is it John Travolta's unintentionally (I presume) hilarious performance as a villain who's part community-theater Iago and part Rastaman pimp. It's <i>hair.</i> There's more of it in this movie than in the sink trap at Supercuts.</p><p>First there are the heaping dreadlocks of the Psychlos, the evil alien race that rules the Earth in the year 3000. Then there are the flowing, Manson-era tresses of the rebellious humans led by Jonnie (Barry Pepper), who sports the rawhide trousers and bad attitude of Billy Jack. I found a picture of director Roger Christian on the Web, and <i>he's</i> got golden Fabio locks. (Most Hollywood directors, by contrast, resemble trolls who got trapped in the tanning booth.) Everybody in the film, in short, looks like they know where to find truly excellent weed.</p><p>If you're the kind of sci-fi fanatic who has to see every new futuristic action movie no matter how crummy it is -- and I come pretty close to that category myself -- then of course you'll check out "Battlefield Earth" regardless of how many cheap jokes critics crack at its expense. The action sequences are acceptable in a generic, Sci-Fi Network way and the Psychlo costumes at least look cool. But don't say you weren't warned.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/12/battlefield_earth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/12/battlefield_earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;American Pharaoh: Mayor Richard J. Daley &#8212; His Battle for Chicago and the Nation&#8221; by Adam Cohen and Elizabeth Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/11/cohen_taylor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/11/cohen_taylor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Taylor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/05/11/cohen_taylor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A big biography tells the full story of the legendary politician, with a sharp focus on his battle to keep the Windy City segregated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>ike former Alabama Gov. George Wallace, Chicago's legendary Mayor Richard J. Daley became a national figure in the 1960s as a symbol of working-class white backlash against the civil rights movement and the student left. Both men embodied 20th century political institutions that were bound for history's scrapheap -- in Daley's case, the patronage-driven urban political machine. And both were Democrats, though the demographics they respectively represented -- disaffected white Southerners and rapidly suburbanizing Northern white ethnics -- became the bedrock constituency of the Reagan revolution and the Republican congressional majority.</p><p>Despite the subtitle that Adam Cohen and Elizabeth Taylor have given their engrossing and massively detailed new biography of  Daley -- "His Battle for Chicago and the Nation" -- the authors depict a man who was rarely concerned with national politics or with political theory or philosophy. The Daley of "American Pharaoh" is a shrewd manipulator who approaches every issue, every conflict, as either a threat to his power or an opportunity to consolidate it. For all his famous malapropisms ("The policeman is not there to create disorder, the policeman is there to preserve disorder"), Daley was always intensely focused on his prime objective: preserving political power at any cost whatsoever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/11/cohen_taylor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/11/cohen_taylor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Gladiator&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/gladiator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/gladiator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/05/05/gladiator</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We who are about to be bored salute you! Russell Crowe stars in Ridley Scott&#039;s Roman bloodfest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>or all practical purposes, Ridley Scott's reputation as one of the most important mainstream directors of his era rests on just two movies, but what movies they are! "Alien" and "Blade Runner" didn't just imagine the future, they helped create it. Grumpy critics like me often claim that style has become substance in Hollywood filmmaking, and in Scott's case it's all too true. For better or worse, design is the point of his films; it is his narrative mode, his central character and his subject matter. As my significant other suggested the other night, now that Scott has lived to see the designers of midtown Manhattan self-consciously emulate "Blade Runner," perhaps the ancient world is all he has left to exploit.</p><p>With the lone exception of "Thelma and Louise," which is atypical of his work in many ways, Scott's post-1982 films have failed to capture filmgoers' imaginations or to strike the sparks of cold genius that seemed so evident in his early, visionary masterpieces. Yeah, I know that "Legend" and "Someone to Watch Over Me" have their defenders (myself included), but that's not the point. As for "1492: Conquest of Paradise,"  "White Squall" and  <a href="/aug97/entertainment/jane970822.html">"G.I. Jane,"</a> well, please. We're talking expensive candy -- <i>really</i> expensive candy -- with no chewy center.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/gladiator/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/05/gladiator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of babyfaces and heels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/mankind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/mankind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2000/05/02/mankind</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From crimson masks to electrifying sports entertainers, two bestselling wrestling books chronicle the blood, sweat and touching humanism of America&#039;s most popular redneck soap opera.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n ordinary American speech, to open up is to share your thoughts and feelings, to become emotionally vulnerable. In professional wrestling, to open up is to bleed. Mick Foley -- known to wrestling fans as the lunatic Mankind and, before that, as the wild man Cactus Jack -- has opened up, in both senses of the term, more than most people. Maybe it comes to the same thing in the end. As he suggests in his winsome bestseller, "Have a Nice Day!" his intense connection with his fans seems to correlate with his reckless abandon, his willingness to absorb punishment while they watch in some mixture of horror and delight. Almost literally, he sheds blood for their sins.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/mankind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/05/02/mankind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Where the Heart Is&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/heart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/04/28/heart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With an Oprah-book plot and Hallmark sentimentality, the trailer-park melodrama never lets you forget that Natalie Portman and Ashley Judd are hot babes with perfect complexions.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>V</b>ideo renters of the future will forever be perplexed by "Where the Heart Is," sitting<br />
there on the shelf right next to <a href="/ent/movies/int/1998/12/17int.html">John Boorman's</a> 1990 film of <a href="/ent/movies/tayl/1998/12/14tayl.html">exactly the same name.</a><br />
Well, here's my advice, which you can print out, fold up and stick in your wallet against<br />
that day: <i>Rent the other one.</i> (OK, it sort of blows too, but with the young Uma<br />
Thurman and Crispin Glover in the cast, it's miles ahead.)</p><p>This "Where the Heart Is," adapted from an <a href="/books/feature/1999/11/12/oprahpro/index.html">Oprah-endorsed</a> bestseller by Billie Letts,<br />
starts off with two adorable female stars and a tone of folksy, trailer-park melodrama<br />
that puts it squarely in Fried Green Endearment country. But as its story becomes more<br />
and more ludicrous, its vision of American life becomes more and more canned and<br />
condescending -- a prefabricated blur of ambulances, tornadoes, tearful homilies and<br />
Life Lessons. Maybe the novel's good intentions felt more genuine, but what director<br />
Matt Williams and the longtime comedy screenwriting duo of Lowell Ganz and Babaloo<br />
Mandel (<a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1999/03/26reviewa.html">"EdTV,"</a> "A League of Their Own" and "Parenthood," just to name a few) give<br />
us here is strictly Middle America as seen on CNN.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/heart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wanderlust: A History of Walking&#8221; by Rebecca Solnit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/27/solnit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/27/solnit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/04/27/solnit</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A delightful and mind-expanding look at one of the activities that makes us human.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>D</b>iscussing an eccentric 18th century peripatetic named John Thelwall in her new "Wanderlust: A History of Walking," Rebecca Solnit writes that he suggests "something of a pattern: autodidacts who took the trinity of radical politics, love of nature, and pedestrianism to extremes." While I'm pretty sure Solnit herself has a formal education, her astonishing range of reference and her indefatigable curiosity suggest the passion of an autodidact, and in every other respect she fits the pattern, too. Whether she takes this trinity to extremes is a matter of interpretation, but you could argue that even the attempt to write a history of walking -- arguably the defining human activity -- is itself extreme. Why not the history of talking, or breathing?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/27/solnit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/27/solnit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Dreambirds: The Strange History of the Ostrich in Fashion, Food, and Fortune&#8221; by Rob Nixon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/19/nixon_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/19/nixon_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/04/19/nixon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solitary, plumed, nasty, flightless and weird: Ladies and gentlemen, the world&#039;s most peculiar bird.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>ate in Rob Nixon's "Dreambirds," a beautifully written if rambling book that's somewhere between the history it professes to be and a memoir of dislocation and homecoming, the author sneaks in what he says is the Arab fable of the ostrich's origins. When Allah summoned all of his creatures to be named and categorized, the ostrich decided that it was not a bird, since it could not fly, yet also not a beast, since it had two legs rather than four. Allah noticed the ostrich's aloofness and decreed: "You have cut yourself off from all your fellow creatures. You have chosen to be different and to be alone. So you shall live as you have chosen."</p><p>There is another creature, of course, that walks on two legs, cannot fly and counts itself separate from the birds and the beasts. "Dreambirds" concerns people more than it does ostriches, and mostly it concerns Nixon himself; it's a personal memoir clad in exotic plumage. For Nixon, a native of South Africa who has lived in the United States for 20 years and now teaches literature at the University of Wisconsin, the ostrich is a shifting signifier, a symbolic presence that travels through the background of his story without ever coming clearly into focus. In the fable of the ostrich, he seems to see something of his own rootless, peripatetic nature. He departed South Africa in sudden and clandestine fashion at the nadir of the apartheid era, cutting himself off from his family and the haunting desert landscapes he had cherished as a child. He can return only obliquely, by retracing the route of an awkward, flightless bird that, like him, had wandered from Africa to the New World.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/19/nixon_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/19/nixon_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Keeping the Faith&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/keeping_faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/keeping_faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/04/18/keeping_faith</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edward Norton&#039;s dopey directorial debut gives interfaith romance a bad name.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>elcome back, brothers and sisters, to this week's services at the Church of Movies That Suck. Let those other religions have Saturday and Sunday; in our church we honor Friday, the day that brings us renewed hope each week, the day alive with the trembling possibility, so rarely fulfilled, of a movie that does not suck. Our sermon this week is entitled "Smart Actors, Foolish Choices," and for our more traditional congregants in the back, who are already rolling their eyes over my foray into New Age squishiness, let's get specific. How in the name of George Kennedy's career did Edward Norton and Ben Stiller, two of the best and most individual of contemporary movie actors, get roped into this pallid, witless comedy of interfaith romance, which would have seemed embarrassingly weak as a Borscht Belt resort skit in 1959?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/keeping_faith/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/18/keeping_faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soul of the suburbs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/suburbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/suburbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2000/04/13/suburbs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From "American Beauty" to the New York Times, those who satirize and celebrate the burbs seldom understand how they got the way they are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he suburbs are everywhere. From the presidential campaign -- now reduced to two nearly indistinguishable suburban dads -- to Hollywood to the newspaper of record, the traditionally anti-suburban cultural elite is now buzzing with talk about how the burbs aren't what we thought they were. Expect the New Yorker to publish a special Suburban Issue any week now. (OK, I can't resist: <i>Every</i> issue of the New Yorker is the Suburban Issue.)</p><p>Left unanswered in all this, however, is the question of what the suburbs actually are. In both the Oscar-laden <a href="/ent/movies/review/1999/09/15/beauty/index.html">"American Beauty"</a> (a very fine film, in my estimation) and the April 9 issue of the New York Times Magazine, with its "Suburbs Rule" cover package, the issue is clouded by an understandable ambivalence as well as, perhaps, a lack of focus. The suburbs are liberating; the suburbs are confining. The suburbs have become just like the city, or maybe it's the other way around. The suburbs are full of minorities, immigrants, gays and lesbians; the suburbs remain small-minded bastions of fear and conformity. The ambivalence with which Americans regard suburbia is the same ambivalence with which they regard, well, America. On one hand, it's the home of the free. On the other, to paraphrase that great poet of the late-mid-suburban era, <a href="/people/lunch/1999/10/14/byrne/index.html">David Byrne,</a> <i>How did we get here?</i></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/suburbs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/suburbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Ready to Rumble&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/07/ready_to_rumble/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/07/ready_to_rumble/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2000 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/04/07/ready_to_rumble</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it a feature-length commercial for World Championship Wrestling or a juvenile work of deviant genius -- or both?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>ook, there's no point pretending that "Ready to Rumble" isn't completely juvenile and mindless. It isn't merely a wrestling movie; it's a thinly veiled two-hour promotion for World Championship Wrestling, the Ted Turner-owned outfit that's a distant second in the squared-circle racket (behind Vince McMahon's <a href="/ent/col/srag/2000/03/16/beyond_the_mat/index.html">World Wrestling Federation</a>). But given that, director Brian Robbins and screenwriter Steven Brill have produced a work of deviant genius, a hilarious hog wallow in juvenile mindlessness with a gentle spirit of self-mockery and a heart of gold.</p><p>If the clueless twosome of wrestling fans played by David Arquette and Scott Caan have an obvious lineage that includes such previous duo comedies as "Dumb and Dumber" and "Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure" (not to mention countless other pairings stretching back at least to Abbott and Costello), they do this Zen-moronic tradition proud. What really puts "Ready to Rumble" over the top into delirious delight, however, is the hysterical, completely deadpan performance of Oliver Platt as Jimmy King, a swaggering wrestling icon with a scepter, cape and pasteboard crown that would look cheesy at the Tulsa Renaissance Faire. Sure, this movie has some truly embarrassing moments (let's not talk about Martin Landau's performance as an aging wrestling wizard), but for each of those there's another that's laugh-till-you-puke funny. Obviously 12-year-olds across the country will be clamoring to see it, but "Ready to Rumble" should also have a long afterlife ahead as a late-night cult treat for cackling stoners.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/07/ready_to_rumble/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/07/ready_to_rumble/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Skulls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/31/entmoviesreview20000331sku/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/31/entmoviesreview20000331sku/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/03/31/theskulls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evil lurks in the hallowed halls of higher education; so does lousy dialogue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<b>T</b>he Skulls" is such a generic, automatic-pilot movie -- seemingly stitched together out of disconnected outtakes from the USA Network archives -- that seeing it doesn't help you understand it any better. In fact, I'm not quite sure I did see it. Can there really be a movie in which someone makes a cell-phone call from the bowels of a secret-society building that begins, "Dad! I just killed a guy in the Ritual Room!"?</p><p>Then again, "The Skulls" also features another character being dragged away in a straitjacket while howling, "I'm innocent! I'm innocent!" He ends up, of course, in a loony bin that looks like the House of the Seven Gables enclosed by barbed wire. At one point, the hero, Luke (Joshua Jackson), who has decided <i>he must know the truth at all costs,</i> is issued a dire warning: "You keep digging, Luke, and if you keep digging you're gonna dig your own grave." Honestly, though, my favorite line arrives when an allegedly artsy coed named Chloe (Leslie Bibb) has invented a computer program to shoot splotches of paint at the canvas, ` la Jackson Pollock. "Am I the artist or is the machine?" Chloe wonders aloud. "Maybe it's chaos in its purest form."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/31/entmoviesreview20000331sku/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/31/entmoviesreview20000331sku/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Buddy Boy&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/entmoviesreview20000328bud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/entmoviesreview20000328bud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roman Polanski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/03/28/buddy_boy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First-time director Mark Hanlon may have watched "Eraserhead" too many times, but he sure knows how to sustain a mood.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t seems gratuitously cruel to trash an ambitious independent film that has little chance of reaching a large audience, even if it is kind of an incomprehensible mess. So let's at least credit "Buddy Boy," the first feature from writer/director Mark Hanlon, for the courage and daring that are clearly its finest accomplishments. It wants to be about love, madness and the nature of religious faith, yet it also has more practical questions in mind: Can vegans be cannibals? How many times can a guy break into his girlfriend's apartment brandishing a weapon before she will have had enough? If the result of all this is a mannered, pretentious mishmash, in which several talented actors are abandoned to wander around frothing at the mouth, it's just interesting enough to suggest that Hanlon has a far better movie in him somewhere down the line.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/entmoviesreview20000328bud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/28/entmoviesreview20000328bud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mission to Mars&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mission_to_mars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mission_to_mars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/03/10/mission_to_mars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In space, no one can hear you jeer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>O</b>nce upon a time, when Hollywood filmmakers wanted to depict the first meeting between humans and aliens, it was simple: They wrapped a guy in tin foil, put a percolator on his head and called in the military. Then, sometime around 1977 (the year of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind"), the aliens became ethereal New Age beings, bathed in light, with Important Lessons to teach us. Now we can't get rid of the little bastards.</p><p>Take <a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1998/08/cov_07review.html">Brian De Palma's</a> "Mission to Mars." I'm sure everyone involved with this clumsy and dispiriting attempt at space opera hopes it's rapidly forgotten. But that's not going to be easy. This isn't merely a big-budget dud with a name director; it's the sort of spectacularly misguided A-list movie that invites superlatives. Is it worse than "Ishtar"? Worse than "Waterworld"? Worse than "The Sicilian"? (Definitely, probably and maybe not, respectively.) Wherever it ranks in the pantheon of badness, "Mission to Mars" is startlingly inept from start to finish -- it's atrociously written, poorly shot and edited and fatally unfocused. I've seen plenty of worse movies, but most of them were cheap and cynical. This is an honest, earnest epic that fails on every level.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mission_to_mars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mission_to_mars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;3 Strikes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/3strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/3strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/03/03/3strikes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The loosey-goosey South Central romp could use a translator for Clueless White People, but it&#039;s packed with physical comedy yuks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"3 Strikes" is a dumb and sloppy movie,<br />
but it packs a few decent laughs, an<br />
impressive array of comic actors and<br />
several<br />
booty-whomping hip-hop hits into its 82<br />
minutes -- and for non-black viewers<br />
like me it's instructive as well. This<br />
loosey-goosey romp through the<br />
streets and boudoirs of South Central<br />
L.A. is precisely the kind of film<br />
made by and for African-Americans that's<br />
all but ignored by the mainstream<br />
media (there was no press screening, so<br />
I saw it in a Times Square theater<br />
on opening night). Like "How to Be a<br />
Player," "I Got the Hook Up" or<br />
"Friday" (which was co-written by D.J.<br />
Pooh, who makes his directorial debut<br />
here), "3 Strikes" will play for a few<br />
weeks in what the entertainment trade<br />
magazines call "urban markets" before<br />
disappearing onto home video.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/3strikes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/03/3strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Wonder Boys&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/25/entmoviesreview20000225wo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/25/entmoviesreview20000225wo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/02/25/wonder</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Douglas and Tobey Maguire clash, connect and get baked in Curtis Hanson&#039;s literate upscale entertainment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t had to happen eventually. Michael Douglas, Mr. Crisis of '90s Masculinity himself, the movie star who seems, paradoxically enough, to be widely loathed, has made a film in which he looks like total crap. I mean, on purpose. (My significant other claims that the real human-rights violation in Paul Verhoeven's "Basic Instinct" was not its representation of lesbianism but its all-too-flagrant display of Douglas' bare ass.) Shambling through the wintry Pittsburgh of "Wonder Boys" as decaying novelist Grady Tripp, unshaven, unkempt and frequently clad in a fuzzy pink woman's bathrobe, Douglas actually resembles a middle-aged human being for the first time.</p><p>This is such a shock because most of Douglas' previous characters are guys whose entire raison d'jtre seems to be avoiding the aging process. Grady, on the other hand, is long past meltdown; he hasn't just gone to seed, he looks like he's got mushrooms growing in his ears. He's still a soul in anguish -- maybe Douglas can't help bringing that to his character -- but it's a pretty genial, vague, marijuana-steeped anguish. Grady is the genuinely likable if profoundly flawed hero of this literate upscale entertainment, adapted from Michael Chabon's novel by <a href="/ent/col/srag/2000/02/24/kloves/index.html">Steve Kloves</a> and directed by Curtis Hanson, whose last film was the atmospheric if haphazard <a href="/sept97/entertainment/la970919.html">"L.A. Confidential."</a> With a cast this terrific and a story this rich and wry, "Wonder Boys" really can't miss, even if it thumps to an underwhelming and moralistic ending that undoes a fair amount of its goodwill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/25/entmoviesreview20000225wo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/25/entmoviesreview20000225wo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Whole Nine Yards&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/nine_yards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/nine_yards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/02/18/nine_yards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attention airline passengers: Don&#039;t even bother staying awake for this Bruce Willis gangster farce.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P</b>lenty of Hollywood movies are made in Canada to save money on production costs (thanks to inexpensive union labor and the incredible shrinking Canadian dollar). But "The Whole Nine Yards" may be the first to try to turn its cheapness into a virtue. I guess there's something to be said for setting a movie in Montreal if you're filming it there, instead of trying to pass off the city as, say, Dallas or Milwaukee. But this labored gangster farce, a star vehicle for Bruce Willis, doesn't make any hay with its French-Canadian setting, which only adds to the dreary, halfhearted atmosphere. Judging from the dull light that pervades every scene, "The Whole Nine Yards" wasn't just all shot in the same place, it was all shot on the same day.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/nine_yards/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/nine_yards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Pitch Black&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/pitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/pitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/02/18/pitch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something wicked this way comes in David Twohy&#039;s stylish space-crash survival tale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P</b>acked with razzle-dazzle special effects and fueled with aggressive,<br />
hyperactive cinematography and a pulse-pounding narrative that never lets<br />
the tension subside until the final frame, "Pitch Black" is the movie of the<br />
season for sci-fi and horror fans. I'm not going to try to convince you that<br />
this tale of a group of space-crash survivors facing unknown danger on a<br />
mysterious planet is a greatly original work. Although it's the splashiest<br />
cutting-edge effects picture since <a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1999/04/02reviewa.html">"The Matrix,"</a> it lacks that work's epic,<br />
synthetic sweep. But if your taste runs to that flavor of eye candy, "Pitch<br />
Black" will rock you. It's a tightly constructed genre picture, combining<br />
the best paranoid thrills of the "Alien" series with the setting of "Mad Max"<br />
and the anti-Utopian future of "Blade Runner."</p><p>This is apparently Vin Diesel's big week. In this film, playing Riddick, a<br />
sinister, laconic convict with hidden depth, he looks like the first new<br />
action star of the 2000s. Meanwhile, in the next chamber of the multiplex,<br />
you can see him as a youthful stock-trading shark in the ensemble drama<br />
"Boiler Room." (Previously, Diesel had a small role in <a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1998/07/cov_24review.html">"Saving Private Ryan"</a><br />
and was the voice of <a href="/ent/col/srag/1999/08/05/bird/index.html">"The Iron Giant.")</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/pitch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/18/pitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Beauty&#8221; pageant</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/oscar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/oscar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/log/2000/02/16/oscar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar nominations for suburban satire and Denzel Washington; "Mr. Ripley" and Jim Carrey snubbed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>o what will Jim Carrey's I'm-mugging-to-hide-the-pain speech be like at <i>this</i> year's Academy Awards ceremony? Carrey was clearly the biggest loser when the official Oscar nominations were unveiled on Tuesday morning. Several other big names were crossed off the dance card, including Matt Damon, Gwyneth Paltrow, Tom Hanks and Ralph Fiennes.</p><p>David O. Russell's fine "Three Kings" was completely shut out and several other high-end films -- "The End of the Affair," "Magnolia," "Topsy-Turvy" and "The Talented Mr. Ripley" -- were severely dissed. But the biggest industry story of the day is clearly Jim, spurned again.</p><p>Judging by the Oscar nominations, 1999 looks a little less like a groundbreaking year in the history of American film and little more, well, ordinary. Two of this year's best picture nominees are huge hits that dabble in the supernatural ("The Green Mile" and "The Sixth Sense"), two are critics' darlings that did mediocre business in the heartland ("American Beauty" and "The Insider") and the fifth is a family oriented heartwarmer that falls somewhere in between ("The Cider House Rules"). That's a pretty typical ratio for the Academy, which can always be trusted to veer to the right at the last moment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/oscar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/16/oscar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Not One Less&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/not_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/not_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2000/02/11/not_one</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zhang Yimou&#039;s modest Chinese fable uses elegant realism to examine the underside of childhood in the Information Age.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Z</b>hang Yimou's "Not One Less" offers a harshly realistic depiction of poverty in rural China, but it's also a movie with a peculiar comic dimension. It begins with a tone of gentle whimsy, as the 13-year-old heroine becomes the most ill-equipped teacher in the history of education, and ends in irony as she morphs into an accidental TV celebrity. Throughout, "Not One Less" is a tender-hearted fable about those left behind by the exploding economy of contemporary China.</p><p>This film may seem slow, and its concerns distant to many American viewers. But "Not One Less" is a movie whose humanity is irresistibly, even joyfully, accessible. In its own modest way, it's also daring. This tale of a young schoolteacher's impossible odyssey in search of a lost pupil unites technique and subject matter to create a highly compelling, sensually rooted realism that goes beyond the clichis of the "village movie." As a chronicle of childhood in desperate circumstances on the underside of the Information Age, it belongs with <a href="/ent/movies/int/1999/03/11int.html">Walter Salles'</a> "Central Station," and, like that film, it shares something of the quiet, mythic tragedy of Vittorio De Sica's "The Bicycle Thief."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/not_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/11/not_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

