<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Abigail Kramer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/abigail_kramer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unshackling female prisoners in labor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/pregnant_prisoners_restraints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/pregnant_prisoners_restraints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/05/28/pregnant_prisoners_restraints</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York becomes the fourth state to ban an inhumane practice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, here's some news that deserves praise:&#160;Last week,&#160;the New York legislature passed a <a href="https://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5765/images/ATU%20Shackling%205-20-09.pdf">bill</a> (pdf) that prohibits the state&#8217;s prisons from using handcuffs or shackles on female inmates who are about to give birth.</p><p>One of the bill&#8217;s sponsors, Senator Velmanette Montgomery, called the practice of restraining women in labor "barbaric and unconscionable" (which sounds about right to me), but the new law will make New York one of just &#160;<em>four</em> states in the country that restrict the use of restraints on incarcerated women during pregnancy or childbirth. California and Illinois were the first to put any legal limits on the practice -- in both cases, after a series of lawsuits forced the states to overhaul their disastrously inadequate prison healthcare systems. Before the restriction, in Illinois, it was standard practice to chain female inmates to their hospital beds before, during and after the births of their babies. As one advocate <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/02/national/02shackles.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1">told the New York Times</a>, &#8220;What was common was one wrist and one ankle.&#8221; (A policy that, frighteningly enough, looks positively benevolent compared to Kansas&#8217;s, North Carolina&#8217;s and Washington&#8217;s, which allow women to be locked in belly chains and leg irons while they&#8217;re in labor, according to a 2006 <a href="http://www.amnestyusa.org/women/custody/keyfindings_restraints.html">investigation</a> by Amnesty International.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/pregnant_prisoners_restraints/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/28/pregnant_prisoners_restraints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty girls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/19/kramer_dirt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/19/kramer_dirt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/05/19/kramer_dirt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women have a complicated relationship with housework, as explained by the author of a new anthology on the subject.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dirt has long been sticky stuff for feminism.&#160;Four&#160;decades after Alix Kates Shulman published her classic essay, "<a href="http://jwa.org/feminism/_html/_pdf/JWA064a.pdf">A Marriage Agreement</a>," American family researchers still trot out <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/fashion/sundaystyles/09HOUSE.html?scp=5&amp;sq=women%20housework&amp;st=cse">surprising!</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/15/magazine/15parenting-t.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;fta=y">new evidence!</a> that the country is far from reaching gender parity on housework. The pernicious double-shift chases women through the generations like a mob of vengeful, undead dust bunnies;&#160;<a href="http://www.parenting.com/article/Mom/Relationships/Mad-at-Dad">mommies trash daddies</a> in major publications and <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/parenting/2009/02/tight-lipped_moms_are_mad_at_d.html">daddies trash mommies</a> right back. The chore wheel keeps on turning and our national conversation about the minutia of domesticity goes on -- as evidenced, in one small part, by the release of a new anthology called "<a href="http://www.sealpress.com/book.php?isbn=1580052614">Dirt: The Quirks, Habits and Passions of Keeping House</a>."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/19/kramer_dirt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/19/kramer_dirt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop the biopharmaceutical bodysnatching!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/kramer_breast_cancer_genes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/kramer_breast_cancer_genes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/05/18/kramer_breast_cancer_genes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ACLU is suing to end corporate patents on the breast cancer gene.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/05/18/menarche_gene/index.html">another</a> piece of news from the human genome, the ACLU <a href="http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/gen/brca.html">filed a lawsuit</a> last week, challenging corporate patents on the two smidgens of DNA linked to heritable forms of breast and ovarian cancer.</p><p>When they're healthy, the two genes, <a href="http://www.breastcancer.org/risk/genetic/">BRCA1 and BRCA2</a>, work to keep breast cells growing normally. But when they contain certain mutations, they can indicate that a woman has a <a href="http://www.cancer.org/docroot/NWS/content/NWS_2_1x_Should_You_Be_Tested_for_Breast_Cancer_Genes.asp">40-85 percent chance</a> of developing cancer in her breasts or ovaries. Women with extensive family histories of cancer often choose to be screened for the mutations, since positive tests can indicate the need for precautionary measures such as more frequent mammograms or MRIs, prophylactic drugs or, in some cases, preventive mastectomies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/kramer_breast_cancer_genes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/18/kramer_breast_cancer_genes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Houston pulls a Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/rape_victims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/rape_victims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/05/11/rape_victims</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rape victims are being billed for the investigation of their own assault]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A big thank you to the criminal justice establishment of Houston for giving victims one more reason not to report rape. Along with the long-established odds of being ignored, disbelieved, humiliated, re-traumatized and <a href="http://thecurvature.com/2009/04/03/actual-rape-victim-jailed-for-false-report/comment-page-1/">possibly incarcerated</a>, a local news channel <a href="http://www.click2houston.com/news/19400415/detail.html#">reports</a> that Houston rape victims are being billed for the investigation of their own assaults.</p><p>The news story was triggered by the case of a woman whose rapist had been convicted, in part because she participated in forensic evidence collection at a local hospital immediately after her assault. Officers assured her she wouldn't have to pay for the procedure (you know, kind of like the way a burglary victim doesn't pay police to fingerprint the scene of the crime) yet she received a bill -- marked delinquent -- for nearly $2000.</p><p>Texas has a Crime Victims' Compensation Fund that automatically covers up to $700 of the cost of a sexual assault investigation, but state law requires victims to exhaust all other potential sources before the fund will kick down any more. ("We're so sorry that you've been through hell, ma'am. Please submit an invoice in triplicate to your insurance company.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/rape_victims/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/rape_victims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistani pop singer killed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/04/udas_murder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/04/udas_murder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/05/04/udas_murder</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ayman Udas was shot to death last week for the sin of appearing on TV.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A female Pakistani singer was <a href="http://news.oneindia.in/2009/05/03/pak-singer-ayman-udas-shot-by-brothers-for-tv-sin.html">shot to death last week</a>, apparently by her own brothers, for the sin of appearing on TV.&#160;</p><p>Ayman Udas was a local celebrity in the city of Peshawar, the capital of Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province (NWFP). The area is at the center of the struggle between the country's secular government, tribal factions and the increasingly powerful Pakistani Taliban. And as is so often the case on the frontiers of culture wars, women's freedoms have been among the first casualties. The NWFP is where a group of men were caught on video last month, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/world/asia/04swat.html?hpw">whipping a screaming teenaged girl</a>. Talibani groups have bombed and burned <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/28/taliban-destoy-girls-educ_n_161563.html">hundreds of girls' schools</a> in the region, and religious militants terrorized thousands of women away from participating in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/19/world/asia/19peshawar.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=peshawar%20women&amp;st=cse.">last year's national elections.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/04/udas_murder/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/04/udas_murder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain&#8217;s first female poet laureate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/01/carol_duffy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/01/carol_duffy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/05/01/carol_duffy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once called a "poetess" by her male colleagues, Carol Ann Duffy becomes the first woman to hold the prestigious post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol Ann Duffy has been appointed Britain's first female poet laureate after a 341-year run of men. That's an awful long monopoly, but England, not to mention poetry, has rarely been accused of being quick to change. (Elizabeth Barrett Browning was considered for the post in 1850, but she lost out to Alfred Tennyson.)</p><p>Duffy first got attention in 1999 with the collection "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Worlds-Wife-York-Notes-Advanced/dp/1405861851/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1241208080&amp;sr=8-3">The World's Wife</a>," which views literature and history through the eyes of women behind myth-making men (poems include "Mrs. Faust" and "Pilate's Wife").&#160;According to a <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2009/may/01/carol-ann-duffy-poet-laureate">story in the Guardian</a>, she was widely regarded as runner-up in 1999, when then-Prime Minister Tony Blair chose outgoing laureate Andrew Motion. Rumor had it Blair believed England wasn't ready for Duffy: She's not just a woman, but she's also a lesbian.&#160;</p><p>Duffy <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/5256208/Carol-Ann-Duffy-is-first-woman-Poet-Laureate.html">told BBC Radio 4</a>&#160;she had some hesitation about the position.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/01/carol_duffy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/01/carol_duffy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domestic workers of the world unite!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/domestic_workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/domestic_workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/04/28/domestic_workers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nannies, housekeepers and caregivers rally at New York's state capitol for a bill of rights.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, 300 domestic workers and their supporters traveled to New York's state capitol, where they rallied in support of the <a href="http://www.domesticworkersunited.org/campaigns.php">Domestic Workers Bill of Rights</a>, a piece of legislation that would provide basic protections, including fair pay, to the state's nannies, housekeepers and caregivers. Advocates expect the state Legislature to vote on the bill sometime in the next two months. If it passes, it will be the first law in the country to guarantee rights for domestic employees, who are excluded from the National Labor Relations Act and many of the other regulations protecting workers.</p><p>The event was led by Domestic Workers United, which points out that household employees need protection as much as, if not more than, any other workers -- especially because their work takes place behind closed doors, where they're particularly vulnerable to abuse. When the organization surveyed domestic workers in 2006, they found that 21 percent had been verbally abused by their employers. More than half worked overtime, often 50-60 hours per week, yet 67 percent didn't get overtime pay. Less than half of workers received basic workplace benefits like regular raises and paid sick days.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/domestic_workers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/domestic_workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A feminist&#8217;s first 100 days</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/100_days_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/100_days_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/04/28/100_days</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How has the president performed on women's rights?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Obama edges toward his first 100 days, <a href="http://www.msmagazine.com/press/2009_Obama100Days.asp">Ms. magazine</a> has jumped into the conversation about what he has achieved so far. And while I try to refrain from Obama mania, and I firmly believe the left needs to monitor the Obama administration just as critically as we did his global-gag-ruling predecessor, I am happy to confess that the Ms. report had me humming a few bars of "Hail to the Chief." The report lists 14 ways in which Obama has moved the country toward the full support of women's rights, and while we've reported on several of them before now, it's worth running down a few highlights:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/100_days_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/28/100_days_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another victim of homophobic bullying</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/21/homophobic_bullying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/21/homophobic_bullying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/04/21/homophobic_bullying</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stepfather of a fifth grader who hanged himself tells the paper, "They called him gay and a snitch. All the time they'd call him this."

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another little boy has killed himself after classmates teased and bullied him and called him gay. <a href="http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/dekalb/stories/2009/04/21/boy_suicide_bullying_decatur.html?cxntlid=homepage_tab_newstab">According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution</a>, 11-year-old Jaheem Herrera hung himself inside his home on Thursday afternoon. His little sister, Yerralis, found his body.</p><p>"They called him gay and a snitch," his stepfather said. "All the time they&#8217;d call him this."</p><p>Kate Harding wrote about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/04/17/homphobia_and_teen_suicide/index.html">impact of homophobic bullying</a> last week, on what would have been the 12th birthday of Carl Walker-Hoover, who committed suicide in April after months of being tormented with anti-gay slurs. It was also the 13th National Day of Silence, organized by the <a href="http://www.glsen.org/cgi-bin/iowa/all/home/index.html">Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network</a> "to bring attention to anti-LGBT name-calling, bullying and harassment and effective responses."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/21/homophobic_bullying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/21/homophobic_bullying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Miss USA&#8217;s gay marriage controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/20/miss_usa_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/20/miss_usa_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/04/20/miss_usa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something interesting actually happened at that boring old beauty pageant?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when I thought nothing could ever make me care about the Miss USA pageant ever again, Perez Hilton goes and makes it kind of interesting.</p><p>Acting as a celebrity judge for the competition, which aired on NBC last night, Hilton asked Miss California Carrie Prejean (previously rumored to be a favorite, in case you weren't keeping track) her opinion on same-sex marriage. Prejean had the decency to look a little stressed as she came up with this somewhat garbled, ultimately obnoxious response, for which she got both cheers and boos:</p><p>"I think it's great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land that you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage and, you know what, in my country and my family I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anyone out there but that's how I was raised and that's how I think it should be, between a man and a woman."</p><p>So, three cheers for "opposite marriage," then?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/20/miss_usa_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/20/miss_usa_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The gay marriage apocalypse is coming!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/abigail_christians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/abigail_christians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/04/14/abigail_christians</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last, conservative Christians find the long-sought connection between same-sex weddings and mass murder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case the subtle imagery and delicately layered messaging of last week's <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/04/10/raining_men/index.html">anti-gay-marriage apocalypse ad</a> went over your head, the helpful folks at <a href="http://www.moralityinmedia.org">Morality in Media</a> have endeavored to set the record straight. The Christian advocacy group sent out a press release with the mission of <a href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/904759988.html">"Connecting the Dots: The Line Between Gay Marriage and Mass Murders."</a></p><p>The release notes that, on April 4, the New York Times ran two adjacent front-page articles: one on the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/us/04iowa.html?_r=1&amp;scp=8&amp;sq=iowa%20same%20sex%20marriage&amp;st=cse">Iowa Supreme Court decision</a> to legalize same-sex marriage, and one on the gunman who <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/04/nyregion/04hostage.html?scp=2&amp;sq=binghamton%20new%20york%20gunman&amp;st=cse">murdered 13 people</a> in Binghamton, N.Y. So you get it, right? <em>The stories were on the same page!</em> It's <em>irrefutable proof</em> of the link between homosexuality and murder!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/abigail_christians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/14/abigail_christians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plan B: Trouble in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/illinois_planb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/illinois_planb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/04/07/illinois_planb</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge rules the state can't force pharmacists to dispense morning-after pills.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just last week, Broadsheet's Lynn Harris warned us to <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/04/01/idaho_pharmacists/index.html">watch out for Idaho</a>, where the House of Representatives had passed a bill letting pharmacists refuse to fill prescriptions offensive to their moral or religious sensibilities. "No matter where this goes," she pointed out, "what's happening in Idaho and elsewhere should serve as reminders that if we slip into complacency, then we're the fools."</p><p>Indeed, Idaho was but one stop on the "right of refusal" crazy train. On Monday, an Illinois judge ruled that the state <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-birthcontrol,0,1822531.story">couldn't force two anti-choice pharmacists</a> to dispense Plan B morning-after pills, despite a 2005 state rule that says they have to. Since the two druggists own five pharmacies between them, all located in rural northern Illinois, the decision could make for a serious impingement on local women's access to emergency contraception.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/illinois_planb/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/07/illinois_planb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rockefeller Drug Laws: The end of an error</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/06/rockefeller_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/06/rockefeller_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/04/06/rockefeller_laws</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York finally overturns the egregious laws that left minor offenders like Elaine Bartlett in prison for 16 years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, after 36 merciless years, New York State <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hrQDGBCikvwWtubbq39_snNTrJqgD97BOQ9G0">put an end to the laws</a> that kicked off the country's three-decade-and-counting prison boom.&#160;</p><p>The Rockefeller Drug Laws were enacted back in 1973, when the state was caught in a crime wave widely associated with the national heroin epidemic. The laws were sold as a way to catch big-time dealers and make sure they served lock-em-up-and-throw-away-the-key prison sentences. But because they imposed long mandatory minimum jail times for the possession of small amounts of drugs, and removed judges' power to consider mitigating circumstances, they ended up impacting hundreds of thousands of small-time offenders and just-plain drug addicts. One of the state's most famous drug-law offenders was Elaine Bartlett, who won clemency from former governor George Pataki after spending 16 years in prison for a minor role in a single cocaine sale.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/06/rockefeller_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/06/rockefeller_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12,000 rape kits, untested</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/01/rape_kits_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/01/rape_kits_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/04/01/rape_kits</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LAPD continues to ignore evidence that could help prosecute sexual assaults.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now for something completely frustrating: While prosecutors across the country indict teens for <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/03/27/sexting_suit/index.html">taking topless pictures of themselves</a>, police departments in Los Angeles ignore evidence that could help prosecute thousands of cases of violent rape.</p><p>Tracy Clark-Flory first wrote about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/10/21/rape_kits/">LAPD rape kits backlog</a> in October, but since then the numbers have gotten even worse: Human Rights Watch <a href="http://www.hrw.org/en/node/81825/section/1">reported Tuesday</a> that more than 12,000 rape kits are sitting around untested in L.A. County police departments and crime labs. The kits (taken by an often excruciating, 4-6-hour process) are intended to help prosecute sexual assaults -- as HRW investigator <a href="http://www.womensenews.org/article.cfm/dyn/aid/3966">Sarah Tofte writes</a> on Women's eNews, the kits contain DNA and other evidence collected from victims' bodies and clothes immediately after the crime, and they have the potential to identify rapists, corroborate victims' accounts of assaults and exonerate innocent defendants. Of course, in order to serve those functions, the kits have to actually be used. Nearly 500 of L.A.'s untested kits are attached to cases that have passed the 10-year statute of limitations for rape in California, making it impossible to prosecute rapists even if they were to be identified. Thousands more kits have been destroyed untested.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/01/rape_kits_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/01/rape_kits_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outsmart Mother Nature!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/24/tampax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/24/tampax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/03/24/tampax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tampax's ad campaign sells girl power ... at $4.99 a box.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's no secret that the marketing of lady-products has, historically, been an evil-genius sort of affair, making a killing for pharmaceutical companies by convincing women that our bodies are a little gross, and that we should spend our hard-earned cash on products that ameliorate the yuckiness. The upside of this phenomenon is that "feminine hygiene" advertising has provided years of unintentional hilarity,&#160;filled with soft-focused moments and a <a href="http://www.mum.org/tamad36.htm">dictionary's worth</a> of creative euphemisms.&#160;But according to a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/20/business/media/20adco.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1&amp;ref=business">recent story in the New York Times</a>, Tampax is trying to break from all the <a href="http://www.mum.org/tamad36.htm">old cliches</a>. According to a creative director from Tampax's ad agency Leo Burnett, "There are no walks on the beach, no riding a white horse or sitting on a white couch."&#8232;</p><p>     <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a3kugHmbNgQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a3kugHmbNgQ&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed></object>   </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/03/24/tampax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/03/24/tampax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teens and the sex trade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/prostitution_sweep/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/prostitution_sweep/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/02/25/prostitution_sweep</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent FBI sweep represents a long-overdue shift in the way the government responds to child prostitution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FBI ran a coordinated, nationwide sweep this weekend, picking up nearly 50 teenagers working as prostitutes across the country, some as young as 13.</p><p>The Associated Press and dozens of local papers <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090223/ap_on_go_ot/child_prostitutes">ran the story</a>, describing the teenagers (quite rightly) as victims of a savage commercial sex industry. And because the kids were picked up under federal law, that&#8217;s how they&#8217;ll be treated. According to the FBI, most of the teenagers have been placed with local child protection agencies, which will presumably try to get them into foster homes or residential treatment facilities.</p><p>All of this might seem pretty intuitive -- it doesn&#8217;t take a big stretch of the imagination to see a 13-year-old having sex with adults on the street as a victim. In the words of one FBI deputy: &#8220;The vast majority of these kids are what they term 'throwaway kids,' with no family support, no friends.&#8221; Most have run away from abusive homes. Once they end up on the street, they face heinous rates of violence and sexual assault, and they often end up under the control of pimps who use them as for-profit sex slaves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/prostitution_sweep/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/25/prostitution_sweep/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grandma doin&#8217; time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/golden_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/golden_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/02/13/golden_girls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A disturbing look at the growing number of geriatric women in prison. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is plenty that's just plain insane about this country's criminal justice system (see the <a href="http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/news_room_detail.aspx?id=35912">Pew Center's recent report</a> on discriminatory incarceration trends for some fun facts.) But Viji Sundaram's excellent article, <a href="http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=90940ea33392050bde1225dd95067e36&amp;from=rss">Golden Girls Behind Bars</a>, sheds a whole new light on the American penchant for locking people up and leaving them there. Yes, that's right, it's the growing number of geriatric women in prison.</p><p>Over the course of the nation's three-and-a-half decade (and counting) incarceration boom, the number of women in jails and prisons across the country has multiplied by more than ten. Combine the explosive increase with mandatory-minimum sentencing and three-strikes laws that keep people in prison for longer stints than anywhere else in the Western world, and it turns out that you get, well, a whole lot of little old ladies behind bars.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/golden_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/13/golden_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fired lesbian gets justice (kind of)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/hagen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/hagen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/02/04/hagen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The attorney fired amid rumors that she was gay gets her job back, along with whopping legal fees.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yet <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2009/01/23/gag_rule/">another sign</a> that sanity is making a comeback in Washington, <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=100147494">NPR reported</a> that Leslie Hagen, the Department of Justice attorney who was fired because of rumors that she's a lesbian, has finally gotten her job back.</p><p>Hagen worked as a department liaison until 2006, when she ran afoul of Republican hit-lady Monica Goodling -- most famous for the partisan <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/23/washington/23cnd-monica.html?_r=1&amp;scp=3&amp;sq=goodling&amp;st=cse">hiring and firing scandal</a> that led to the eventual resignation of then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Despite excellent performance reviews, Hagen was fired the first time her job came up for renewal. DOJ staffers leaked the story to <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=89288713">NPR</a>, saying that the order had come from Goodling, who'd gotten word that Hagen was gay. Back at the beginning of 2008, NPR quoted an anonymous Republican source as saying, "To some people, that's even worse than being a Democrat." The story was confirmed a few months later by a Justice Department investigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/hagen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/hagen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hell hath no fury like a mommy scorned</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/parenting_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/parenting_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/01/30/parenting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are married mothers so pissed at their husbands?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parenting.com recently revealed the results of an <a href="http://www.parenting.com/article/Mom/Relationships/Mad-at-Dad">investigation</a> into the marital relationships of 1,000 American mothers. The none-too-shocking news? Married women are pissed at their husbands. According to the poll, 46 percent of moms get irate with their spouses once a week or more. One in 10 describe their rage as "deep and long-lasting." As author Martha Brockenborough writes:</p><blockquote> <p>"We're mad that having children has turned our lives upside down much more than theirs. We're mad that these guys, who can manage businesses or keep track of thousands of pieces of sports trivia, can be clueless when it comes to what our kids are eating and what supplies they need for school. And more than anything else, we're mad that they get more time to themselves than we do."</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/parenting_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/30/parenting_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>151</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
