<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Alex B. Berezow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_b_berezow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Progressives don&#8217;t hold a monopoly on science</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Mooney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican Brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative co-author of a book on partisan science answers his critic from Pacific Standard]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Any book that touches upon politics almost automatically angers half of the American public, regardless of what is written inside of it. It takes a special person—an objective, open-minded and self-critical one—to read and learn from a science book that criticizes people with whom the reader likes and agrees with politically.</p><p>Recently, <em>Pacific Standard</em> published a review (<a href="http://www.psmag.com/magazines/january-february-2013/republican-brain-science-left-behind-chris-mooney-alex-berezow-hank-campbell-50439/">“Red Science, Blue Science,”</a>January/February 2013) by Wray Herbert, a pop psychology writer,of political writer Chris Mooney’s book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Republican-Brain-Science-Science-/dp/1118094514/">The Republican Brain</a></em> and my new book, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Science-Left-Behind-Feel-Good-Anti-Scientific/dp/1610391640/">Science Left Behind</a></em>, which I co-authored with Hank Campbell.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/progressives_dont_hold_a_monopoly_on_science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>