<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Alex Koppelman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_koppelman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>So long, farewell&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/13/farewell_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/13/farewell_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/13/farewell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After three-and-a-half years, today's my last day at Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After three and a half years -- and almost 3,500 posts and stories -- today is my last day at Salon, and this is my last post. It's time for me to move on, to get back to the longer-form writing I&#160;did when I first started at Salon and have missed ever since taking the reins of War Room from Tim Grieve a little more than two years ago.</p><p>When&#160;I was in college, Salon was a dream job, one I never thought I'd get. It didn't let me down; working here has been a fantastic experience. I'd thank everyone who's helped me over the years individually, but we'd be here all day, because there are just so many great people at Salon. So instead, let me just thank everyone I've worked with -- though, really, mere thanks are inadequate for everything they've done for me.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/13/farewell_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/13/farewell_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chief of Staff Ken McKay resigns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/06/rnc_chief_of_staff_quits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/06/rnc_chief_of_staff_quits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/05/rnc_chief_of_staff_quits</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top Republican Party official resigns in wake of scandal over expense at bondage-themed nightclub]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's been quite a bit of turmoil and bad news over at the Republican National Committee lately, and Monday evening brought more: One of the RNC's top officials, Chief of Staff Ken McKay, has resigned.</p><p>The resignation is effective immediately, the RNC announced. Mike Leavitt, who worked on Sen. John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign and has been the party's deputy chief of staff, will be replacing him.</p><p>This move comes in the wake of revelations that the RNC allowed a staffer to expense the cost of taking potential donors to a Los Angeles nightclub that often features topless women, with a bondage theme. That news had only sharpened the criticism Steele has faced over the organization's spending during his tenure, and increased the pressure on him to do something about it. It appears this resignation is both an attempt to show something is being done and to throw McKay under the proverbial bus.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/06/rnc_chief_of_staff_quits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/06/rnc_chief_of_staff_quits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain isn&#8217;t a maverick now that it might hurt him</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/john_mccain_denies_maverick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/john_mccain_denies_maverick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Hayworth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/05/john_mccain_denies_maverick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under pressure from the right, Arizona senator attempts to shed what has been a key part of his persona]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years now, it's seemed like the word "maverick" was permanently fused to Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. He seemed to cherish it, and his advisors often worked to push it; they may have played it down a little during the 2008 Republican presidential primary, but it was an essential part of the eventual nominee's image during the campaign.</p><p>Now, though, McCain is in another Republican primary, facing a legitimate challenger from his right -- former Rep. J.D. Hayworth -- in a decidedly anti-incumbent year. So he's been reinventing himself to some extent. He <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001443-503544.html">went to the right</a> on immigration, for instance, despite the fact that his moderation on the issue had been one of his signatures between the 2000 and 2008 campaigns.</p><p>The senator's latest step in that direction goes much further than that, however.</p><p>"'Maverick' is a mantle McCain no longer claims; in fact, he now denies he ever was one," Newsweek's David Margolick <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/235883">reports</a> in a new article, quoting McCain as saying, "I never considered myself a maverick."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/john_mccain_denies_maverick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/john_mccain_denies_maverick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove tapped for new Census ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/rove_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/rove_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/05/rove_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advisor to former President Bush tapes public service announcement as GOP worries about right's response rate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following up on Gabriel Winant's earlier post on conservatives' feelings about this year's Census, here's an interesting bit of news: The Census Bureau has tapped Karl Rove for a new public service announcement in which he encourages people to return their forms.</p><p>Conservatives farther out on the fringe might be wary of the Census, but Rove is smart enough -- and mainstream enough -- to know that it could be politically disastrous for the Republican Party if the right has an unusually low response rate. That might be what's motivating him here.</p><p>The ad:</p><p>     <object height="273" width="450"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/CyZSbbBjMvA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="273" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CyZSbbBjMvA&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="450"></embed></object>   </p><p>Hat-tip to the Washington Post's <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/04/karl_rove_appears_in_tv_ad_for.html">Federal Eye.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/rove_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/rove_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New soldier joins Birthers&#8217; anti-Obama crusade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/birther_soldier_terrence_lakin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/birther_soldier_terrence_lakin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orly Taitz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/05/birther_soldier_terrence_lakin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Army lieutenant colonel says he'll refuse to obey any orders because of his concerns about president's eligibility]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Birthers are back.</p><p>They never really went away, actually -- in all likelihood, unfortunately, they never will -- but the people who believe President Obama doesn't meet the Constitution's eligibility requirements for his office have at least faded from the news lately. Now, some are working to change that, and they have a new figurehead to rally behind.</p><p>Last week, the American Patriot Foundation announced that Army Lt. Col Terrence Lakin, a flight surgeon, has decided that he'll refuse to obey any and all orders because of his concerns over the circumstances of Obama's birth and birth certificate.</p><p>"I am today compelled to make the distasteful choice to invite my own court martial, in pursuit of the truth about the president's eligibility under the constitution to hold office," Lakin said in a release. (He's also spoken in a YouTube video about his decision; it can be viewed at the bottom of this post.)</p><p>Lakin isn't the first member of the military to become a Birther cause celebre. The case that brought the now-infamous Orly Taitz her first real mainstream media attention involved another one.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/birther_soldier_terrence_lakin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/birther_soldier_terrence_lakin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin is better than her new Fox News show</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/sarah_palin_fox_news_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/sarah_palin_fox_news_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/02/sarah_palin_fox_news_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Alaska governor debuts as talk show host in program featuring warmed-over interviews conducted by others]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday night, when Sarah Palin made her debut as the host of Fox News' "Real American Stories," one thing was clear: Fox really screwed the former governor of Alaska. Or maybe she did it to herself.</p><p>A show that actually involved Palin going out and interviewing the people profiled on "Real American Stories" might well prove to be pretty good television. As an interview subject, Palin's flubbed more than her fair share of opportunities. But she does have a considerable personal magnetism, a skill with people similar to former President Clinton's -- there's a reason she's gotten as far in politics as she has, and that she's inspired such a devoted following -- and watching her use it as an interviewer could be interesting.</p><p>Instead, Palin came in for some embarrassment even before the show aired, when one of the marquee guests Fox announced, rapper LL Cool J, objected to his inclusion as the interview had been conducted by someone else back in 2008. Fox <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/03/31/palin_ll/index.html">pulled the segment</a>, but Thursday's broadcast made clear that it wasn't an isolated problem.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/sarah_palin_fox_news_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/sarah_palin_fox_news_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans changing tune on healthcare reform repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/gop_healthcare_reform_repeal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/gop_healthcare_reform_repeal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Corker, R-Tenn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Burr, R-N.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/01/gop_healthcare_reform_repeal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some senators now offering a more realistic picture of cause's prospects -- not John McCain, though]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After healthcare reform was passed, Republicans started talking a big game about running on repeal this year -- presumably toward congressional majorities -- and then actually repealing it next year. At some point, though, reality had to enter the picture: Even if the GOP&#160;did manage to capture both houses of Congress, there's no way they'd be able to override the inevitable veto from President Obama.</p><p>Still, conservatives have been dogged about pushing Republican politicians to support a strict line on repeal. For the most part, it's worked, as deviations from the party line have been quickly slapped down. But now some Republican senators are starting to paint a more realistic picture.</p><p>"It may not be total repeal at the end of the day," North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr, who's up for reelection, <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=M2ZiYTg0OWY1MTUxZDhlMGNhMTIzYmYyNzU1Y2E3ODg=">said</a> in a recent interview. "It may be a series of fixes over the course of this bill getting enacted that allow us to change and possibly bend that cost curve down."</p><p>Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker was less subtle. Talking about repeal efforts on Wednesday, Corker said, "The fact is that's not going to happen, OK?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/gop_healthcare_reform_repeal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/gop_healthcare_reform_repeal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rainbows, unicorns and Obama: The GOP&#8217;s April Fool&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/nrsc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/nrsc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/01/nrsc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[National Republican Senatorial Committee comes up with a parody video that's actually sort of funny]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, it's been a pretty lame April Fool's Day. Google is apparently <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/different-kind-of-company-name.html">not even trying anymore</a>, Fishbowl DC's <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/the_revolving_door/politicos_vandehei_to_bloomberg_157016.asp">Politico joke</a> was way too obvious -- even the Daily Caller's <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2010/04/01/vice-president-joe-biden-has-perfect-ncaa-bracket-up-to-final-four/">article</a> about Vice President Biden having a perfect NCAA bracket was good only for a brief smirk.</p><p>All that means that the National Republican Senatorial Committee may be the leading contender for best joke of the day. Seriously.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/nrsc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/nrsc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Santorum, a serious presidential candidate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/santorum_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/santorum_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/01/santorum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Pennsylvania senator gearing up for campaign, reportedly based on premise he was right all along]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Politics Daily today, conservative writer Matt Lewis <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/01/rick-santorums-presidential-ambitions-dont-take-them-lightly/">makes an interesting argument</a>:&#160;</p><blockquote> <p>&#160;</p> <p>Rick Santorum has some high hurdles to overcome, but don't write him off. Just as Mike Huckabee came out of nowhere to pose a credible challenge to John McCain in 2008, Santorum may also surprise in 2012.</p> </blockquote><p>Yes, this means Lewis thinks that the former Pennsylvania senator is a viable <em>presidential candidate</em> two years from now.</p><p>It's an interesting thought exercise -- and Lewis does make some good points -- but probably not much more than that. Santorum has a whole lot of baggage. And, more importantly, the economy is likely to remain a major issue come 2012. If it is, someone like Santorum whose identity centers around social, not economic, conservatism is at a real disadvantage.</p><p>But Santorum and his advisors have a strategy, Lewis reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/santorum_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/01/santorum_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News, Sarah Palin vs. LL Cool J</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/palin_ll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/palin_ll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/31/palin_ll</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Network announced rapper as one of first guests on former governor's show, but then things went downhill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ladies, in general, Love Cool James. But after today, we probably can't count former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin among LL Cool J's fans.</p><p>Fox News had announced the rapper as a guest on the debut episode of Palin's new show, "Real American Stories." The announcement -- and the oddity of it -- did serve to prompt some interest in the premiere. But then LL stepped in, announcing <a href="http://twitter.com/llcoolj/status/11344726168">on Twitter</a>, "Fox lifted an old interview I gave in 2008 to someone else &amp; are misrepresenting to the public in order to promote Sarah Palin's Show. WOW."</p><p>Fox says the interview was originally part of an online series also called "Real American Stories," the Los Angeles Times <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2010/03/ll-cool-j-said-he-didnt-agree-to-be-part-of-sarah-palins-new-show-on-fox-news.html">reports.</a> But it decided to pull the segment anyway, and a spokeswoman said, "[A]s it appears that Mr. Smith does not want to be associated with a program that could serve as an inspiration to others, we are cutting his interview from the special and wish him the best with his fledgling acting career."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/palin_ll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/palin_ll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there anyone who likes Obama&#8217;s drilling decision?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_reacts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_reacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner, R-Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/31/drilling_reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criticism of move to open areas of coast for oil exploration pours in, predictably]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Minority Leader John Boehner is nothing if not predictable. And his response to President Obama's decision to open areas of the U.S. coastline for offshore oil drilling was, too, completely predictable.</p><p>Republicans have long called for this kind of drilling -- it was the impetus for the "Drill, baby, drill!" chant of the 2008 GOP convention. But Boehner slammed the move and the president anyway, saying the administration hadn't gone far enough:</p><blockquote> <p>The Obama Administration continues to defy the will of the American people who strongly supported the bipartisan decision of Congress in 2008 to lift the moratorium on offshore drilling not just off the East Coast and in the Gulf of Mexico, but off the Pacific Coast and Alaskan shores as well. Opening up areas off the Virginia coast to offshore production is a positive step, but keeping the Pacific Coast and Alaska, as well as the most promising resources off the Gulf of Mexico, under lock and key makes no sense at a time when gasoline prices are rising and Americans are asking "Where are the jobs?"</p> <p>It's long past time for this Administration to stop delaying American energy production off all our shores and start listening to the American people who want an "all of the above" strategy to produce more American energy and create more jobs. Republicans are listening to the American people and have proposed a better solution -- the American Energy Act -- which will lower gas prices, increase American energy production, promote new clean and renewable sources of energy, and encourage greater efficiency and conservation.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_reacts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_reacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama administration: Drill, baby, drill!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/31/drilling</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some areas off U.S. coast to be opened for oil drilling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the 2008 presidential campaign, with voters concerned about high gas prices, Republicans made "drill, baby, drill!" into a rallying cry. It wasn't enough to keep Barack Obama from the White House -- but now that he's there, Obama will be heeding that call. His administration <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/science/earth/31energy.html?hp">plans to end</a> a longstanding moratorium on offshore oil drilling and open up large swaths off the U.S. coastline for exploration.</p><p>Under the administration's plan, which has not yet been officially announced but which was detailed for reporters from <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033100024.html?hpid=topnews">multiple</a> <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35223.html">outlets</a>, 167 million acres of the Atlantic coast, from Delaware to Florida, would be opened. So would another roughly 130 million acres in the Arctic Ocean, and areas in the Gulf of Mexico. The Pacific coast would remain closed to drilling, as would environmentally sensitive areas like Bristol Bay in Alaska, where the Bush administration had wanted to allow exploration.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/drilling_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems&#8217; healthcare win doesn&#8217;t close enthusiasm gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/healthcare_motivation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/healthcare_motivation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/30/healthcare_motivation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN poll shows Republican voters still more excited about voting in November]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far -- and it's early yet -- passing healthcare reform doesn't seem to have improved Democrats' chances for this fall much. <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/30/cnn-poll-health-care-passage-motivates-voters/?fbid=H26MxBRTH0E">A new CNN&#160;poll</a> shows that voters on both sides are more enthusiastic about the prospect of voting this year than they were before the bill passed, but that hasn't helped the Dems much.</p><p>Even before the bill passed, there was a wide enthusiasm gap -- Republican voters are simply much more energized this year than Democrats are. And since a midterm like this one typically ends up hinging on base motivation, that's bad news for the blue team.</p><p>According to CNN's latest survey, that gap remains. Back in January, 31 percent of Democrats said they were either "extremely enthusiastic" or "very enthusiastic" about voting this year, compared with 49 percent of Republicans who said the same thing. Now, it's 36 percent of Democrats and 55 percent of Republicans.</p><p>That said, though, here's something to consider -- and this was an argument that leading Democrats made to wavering members of Congress in the days before the healthcare vote: What would these numbers look like if reform <em>hadn't</em> passed?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/healthcare_motivation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/healthcare_motivation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid&#8217;s reelection strategy crumbling</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/ashjian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/ashjian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/30/ashjian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tea Party candidate that Senate leader needs to siphon votes from GOP faces jail time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry&#160;Reid doesn't have a whole lot of hope of winning reelection this year. What hope he does have rests on his opponents:&#160;Despite Reid's very vulnerable position, the field of Republicans running against him isn't particularly strong. And, more importantly, there's also a Tea Party candidate in the field -- if Reid gets really lucky, that candidate, Scott Ashjian, might just siphon off enough votes from the Republicans to hand the incumbent a victory.</p><p>But there's a problem for Reid. Seems Ashjian isn't exactly the ideal candidate -- in fact, a local prosecutor is <a href="http://www.ktnv.com/Global/story.asp?s=12224171">seeking an arrest warrant</a> for him over some bad checks he allegedly wrote. He faces up to 14 years in prison if convicted. (Hat-tip to <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2010/03/30/tea_party_candidate_may_be_headed_for_jail.html">Political Wire.</a>)</p><p>To get a sense as to just how big of a blow this might be to Reid, consider this: One tea party group, Tea Party Express, considered Ashjian enough of a threat to the majority leader's Republican opponents that it's taken out an ad specifically disavowing him, and there have been charges he's a Democratic plant.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/ashjian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/ashjian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is right&#8217;s obsession with Obama&#8217;s teleprompter racist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/bud_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/bud_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Senate Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/30/bud_day</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swift Boat Vet's off-beat statement raises question about tenor of conservatives' criticism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida Gov. Charlie Crist badly needs some help in his Senate race, as he's currently trailing fellow Republican Marco Rubio. He'd hoped to get some of that help with an endorsement from retired Col. Bud Day, a former Swift Boat Vet. Instead, Crist got a new round of controversy, thanks to <a href="http://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/day-27423-charlie-senate.html">some remarks</a> by Day:</p><blockquote> <p>"You know, we just got through (electing) a politician who can run his mouth at Mach 1, a black one, and now we have a Hispanic who can run his mouth at Mach 1," Day said. "You look at their track records and they're both pretty gritty. Charlie has not got a gritty track record."</p> <p>Day confirmed he was speaking of Obama and Rubio.</p> <p>"You've got the black one with the reading thing. He can go as fast as the speed of light and has no idea what he's saying," Day said. "I put Rubio in that same category, except I don't know if he's using one of those readers."</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/bud_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/bud_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Georgia, an impeachment fight over healthcare reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/georgia_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/georgia_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/30/georgia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican lawmakers move against state attorney general for refusal to sue feds over new law]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Healthcare reform has been, obviously, a very controversial issue. In Georgia, it's now even led to an effort to impeach the state's attorney general.</p><p>Republicans wanted Attorney&#160;General Thurbert Baker to join colleagues from more than a dozen other states in suing the federal government over the new law. But Baker, a Democrat who's running for governor this year, refused. (For the record, the consensus among legal scholars, even some on the right, seems to be that these suits have little chance of succeeding.)</p><p>That's led to some efforts to get around him -- incumbent Gov. Sonny Perdue, a Republican, came up with the idea of <a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/georgia-politics-elections/perdue-to-file-health-404398.html">appointing a "special attorney general"</a> to file suit instead -- and one effort to just get him out of office altogether. Today, one member of the state legislature <a href="http://twitter.com/ewerickson/statuses/11319004279">reportedly</a> filed articles of impeachment against Baker.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/georgia_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/georgia_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC fires staffer involved in nightclub expense</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/rnc_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/rnc_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/30/rnc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Young Eagles" director had attended event at bondage-themed venue with potential donors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican National Committee is still dealing with the very public fallout of its having paid for a trip to a bondage-themed nightclub in Los Angeles. One staffer who reportedly authorized the expense -- and accompanied a group of donors to the club -- has been fired.</p><p>That staffer <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/30/fired-rnc-staffer-was-young-eagles-director/?fbid=H26MxBRTH0E">has been identified as</a> Allison Meyers, who was in charge of the RNC's "Young Eagles" program. In that role, Meyers worked on outreach to donors in their 30's and 40's.</p><p>The RNC has been circulating <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/03/30/rnc-staffer-fired-after-nightclub-controversy/?fbid=H26MxBRTH0E">an internal memo</a> on the controversy written by Chief of Staff Ken McKay. In it, McKay writes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/rnc_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/rnc_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stewart, &#8220;Daily Show&#8221; take on post-healthcare threats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/tds_healthcare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/tds_healthcare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/30/tds_healthcare</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for a two-state solution to separate liberals, conservatives?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After being off for a week, "The Daily Show" crew is finally back and able to deal with all the fuss over healthcare reform and the controversy that has followed its passage. Thankfully, they did a very good job of covering the current atmosphere.&#160;</p><p>&#160;</p><table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="353" style="font: 11px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); background-color: rgb(245, 245, 245);" width="360"> <tbody> <tr style="background-color: rgb(229, 229, 229);" valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;">           <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">The Daily Show With Jon Stewart</a>         </td> <td style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; text-align: right; font-weight: bold;">Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 14px;" valign="middle"> <td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;">           <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-29-2010/health-care-slime-machine" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">Health Care Slime Machine</a>         </td> </tr> <tr style="height: 14px; background-color: rgb(53, 53, 53);" valign="middle"> <td colspan="2" style="padding: 2px 5px 0px; width: 360px; overflow: hidden; text-align: right;">           <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" style="color: rgb(150, 222, 255); text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" target="_blank">www.thedailyshow.com</a>         </td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;">           <embed allowfullscreen="true" allownetworking="all" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" flashvars="autoPlay=false" height="301" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:267844" style="display: block;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="360" wmode="window"></embed>         </td> </tr> <tr style="height: 18px;" valign="middle"> <td colspan="2" style="padding: 0px;"> <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="100%" style="margin: 0px; text-align: center;" width="100%"> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">                   <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes" style="font: 10px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Daily Show Full Episodes</a>                 </td> <td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">                   <a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com" style="font: 10px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Political Humor</a>                 </td> <td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;">                   <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/videos/tag/health" style="font: 10px arial; color: rgb(51, 51, 51); text-decoration: none;" target="_blank">Health Care Reform</a>                 </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/tds_healthcare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/tds_healthcare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin taunts her critics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/palin_66/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/palin_66/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/29/palin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Alaska governor pokes fun at those concerned about language she used recently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is apparently not particularly sympathetic to the arguments of those who criticized her for using images of targets on her Web site to depict Democratic members of Congress that her political action committee is, well, targeting this year. In fact, she's outright mocking her critics now.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=375184908434">a post</a> on Palin's Facebook page, ostensibly about the NCAA&#160;men's basketball tournament (emphases in the original):</p><blockquote> <p>To the teams that desire making it this far next year: Gear up! In the <em>battle</em>, set your <em>sights</em> on next season&#8217;s <em>targets</em>! From the shot <em>across the bow</em> -- the first second&#8217;s tip-off -- your leaders will be in the enemy&#8217;s <em>crosshairs</em>, so you must execute strong defensive tactics. You won&#8217;t win only playing defense, so get on offense! The crossfire is intense, so penetrate through enemy territory by bombing through the press, and use your strong weapons &#8211; your Big Guns &#8211; to drive to the hole. Shoot with accuracy; aim high and remember it takes blood, sweat and tears to win.</p> <p>Focus on the goal and fight for it. If the gate is closed, go over the fence. If the fence is too high, pole vault in. If that doesn&#8217;t work, <em>parachute in</em>. If the other side tries to push back, your attitude should be &#8220;go for it.&#8221; <em>Get in their faces and argue with them</em>. (Sound familiar?!) Every possession is a battle; you&#8217;ll only win the war if you&#8217;ve picked your battles wisely. No matter how tough it gets, <em>never retreat</em>, instead RELOAD!</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/palin_66/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/palin_66/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man who spent RNC money at racy nightclub identified</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erik_brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erik_brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/03/29/erik_brown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political consultant, not Michael Steele, reportedly visited bondage-themed venue -- but RNC still paid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele is off the hook for the almost $2,000 spent at Voyeur West Hollywood, a risque nightclub. Sort of.</p><p>The man who actually spent the money has been <a href="http://washingtonscene.thehill.com/in-the-know/36-news/3071-la-bondage-club-?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">identified</a> as Erik Brown, a Republican consultant. And the RNC maintains that Steele had no involvement whatsoever.</p><p>"The chairman was never at the location in question; he had no knowledge of the expenditure, nor does he find the use of committee funds at such a location at all acceptable," an RNC spokesman has said.</p><p>That may not be enough to get him off the hook altogther, however. There's still the issue of an expenditure like this being approved at all, and there's a larger context of skepticism about consultants that Steele has brought in during his tenure at the RNC; that was one of the reasons RNC members forced the chairman to give up some of his control over the group's finances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erik_brown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/erik_brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
