<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Alex Pareene</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_pareene/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, East Coast Republicans, but this is your party too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor helps the GOP keep power -- then doesn't like the results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spare me, Chris Christie. The New Jersey governor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/chris_christie_gops_toxic_politics_to_blame_for_delayed_sandy_aid/">delighted political reporters</a> with his theatrical excoriation of the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives after Speaker John Boehner refused to allow a bill funding aid for people affected by Hurricane Sandy to come to the floor for a vote this week.</p><p>This would be the same Christie who, in September 2012, headlined <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81052.html">a fundraiser for Iowa congressman Steve King</a>, who is not just one of the craziest members of the GOP crazy wing, but who also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/31/steve-king-hurricane-sandy_n_2047553.html">announced a month later that he probably wouldn't vote for relief money for Sandy victims</a> for the same reason he refused to vote for federal aid for victims of Hurricane Katrina: Because he was pretty sure people spent the relief money on "Gucci bags and massage parlors." This is a man Christie wanted to win reelection, in order to help Republicans maintain control of the House of Representatives, so that they could continue ignoring the priorities and desperate needs of liberal, urban coastal states like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why 2013 is going to be awful</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's to a year of austerity, dysfunction, lousy Obama negotiations -- and no "Louie"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is 2012 is over and will never happen again. The bad news is, now it's 2013. Here's why I'm not holding out hope for a great year in politics:</p><p><strong>Austerity</strong></p><p>It's coming. Congress will obsess over crafting a long-term deficit deal no matter what happens with the tax rates and the sequester. In all likelihood, we'll get regressive budget cuts at all levels of government, plus, for good measure, tax hikes not just on the rich but on working people. The well-funded "Fix the Debt" monsters will still demand massive cuts to Social Security and Medicare. Republicans are justifiably confident that they can use the debt ceiling to force more spending cuts less than a month from now. If all of this sinks the still-sluggish economic recovery, that'll be just one more sign that we need to cut more, and "tighten our belts." Plus the debt ceiling fight might just crash the world economy anyway.</p><p><strong>Congress Isn't Going to Do Anything</strong></p><p>As historically unproductive as the 112th Congress was, there's not much reason to expect more from the 113th. The Senate has gotten marginally more liberal and the House has gotten marginally less Republican, but the basic makeup of both is the same. It's still the case that House Republicans have no incentive to compromise on anything, while Senate Democrats live to compromise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP hasn&#8217;t fallen off a cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter how destructive and harmful and foolish they've been this month, they'll bounce back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, the Republican "strategy" on the current self-inflicted looming debt crisis is to constantly sabotage themselves and, eventually, the nation as a whole. Either they will just totally lose completely, or they'll somehow manage, through nihilism and intransigence, to pull out a deeply unpopular "victory" that will end up hurting the already crappy economy. So, basically, everyone agrees that <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanton/are-these-guys-really-in-charge-of-the-republican">they're idiots and they're screwing themselves</a>. Even people who think the GOP's "let's be very loudly irresponsible and then lose horribly" strategy is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-28/when-getting-your-butt-kicked-is-the-strategy.html">more canny than it looks</a> agree that it hurts the "national brand" of the party and will likely lead to them becoming a permanent minority party.</p><p>I think, though, that regardless of how completely lost the Republican party is -- and they are well and truly lost, and not currently "negotiating" with anything resembling a coherent plan or unified voice -- they will emerge from the current mess unscathed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate FISA vote inspiring display of bipartisan commitment to ignoring Fourth Amendment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/senate_fisa_vote_inspiring_display_of_bipartisan_commitment_to_ignoring_fourth_amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/senate_fisa_vote_inspiring_display_of_bipartisan_commitment_to_ignoring_fourth_amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiretapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fiscal calamity? Who cares! Congress shows that they can still band together and vote for horrible things]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congressional dysfunction and extremism may yet plunge the nation into an entirely avoidable recession, but at least Americans will likely be able to sleep at night secure in the knowledge that our lawmakers sprang into action at the last possible minute to preserve the <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/12/as-senate-votes-on-warrantless-wiretapping-opponents-offer-fixes/">government's right to constantly spy on everyone without telling anyone about it.</a></p><p>In all likelihood, the Senate will vote today to reauthorize the FISA Amendments Act for a few years, just before the act was scheduled to expire. The House <a href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/house-approves-another-five-years-of-warrantless-wiretapping/">reauthorized it all the way back in September</a>, but the world's most deliberative body likes to take its time (plus Ron Wyden placed a hold on the bill until Senate leaders agreed to at least have a debate on proposed amendments to the Amendments).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/senate_fisa_vote_inspiring_display_of_bipartisan_commitment_to_ignoring_fourth_amendment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/senate_fisa_vote_inspiring_display_of_bipartisan_commitment_to_ignoring_fourth_amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s Christmas gift to you is a guarantee that the Republican House will destroy the economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The failure of "Plan B" puts us on the path to default]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, we learned that Speaker of the House John Boehner <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/20/politics/fiscal-cliff/index.html">has no control over his majority.</a> We've seen Boehner have trouble with his caucus before, of course -- a significant portion of these people are crazy -- but the failure of "Plan B" was different. In the past Boehner has had trouble whipping votes to support things that were destined to become law. Boehner couldn't get his caucus to support TARP because TARP was awful and was also definitely going to happen. Boehner <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/boehner-other-gop-leaders-ramp-up-pressure-on-republicans-to-pass-debt-plan/2011/07/28/gIQARD5veI_story.html">couldn't get the votes for the 2011 debt deal</a> because conservatives thought they'd eventually force an even better deal. But this was a totally symbolic gesture that never had any shot at passing the Senate or getting signed by the president. Boehner's "Plan B" was a stupid pointless empty gesture, and that is why its failure is actually slightly scary, in addition to <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/336287">being hilarious.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/john_boehners_christmas_gift_to_you_is_a_guarantee_that_the_republican_house_will_destroy_the_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 1: Politico</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim VandeHei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Home of the campaign's loudest, least essential journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Surprise! It's Politico.</p><p>I have <a href="http://www.thebaffler.com/past/come_on_feel_the_buzz">written tens of thousands of words</a> on what, precisely, is wrong with Politico. But I can put the case much more simply here: It's Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 2: The Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Rubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The capital's daily paper is the one with the worst opinion section in the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>The Washington Post is the hometown paper of the city that everyone in America hates, usually for good reason. And the things Americans hate about that city and the people who work there are reflected in its pages.</p><p>The newspaper itself is an ever smaller and more starved-looking thing. The people running it used to actually compete with the New York Times, for readers and writers and national influence. Now they can't really decide if they even want to try.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_2_the_washington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 3: Newsweek</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newsweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niall Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tina Brown's magazine trolled itself to death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>One shouldn't speak ill of the dead, I know. But if Newsweek has taught me anything this year, it's that death is not truly the end, because <a href="http://www.theweek.co.uk/media/49493/newsweek-%E2%80%98hits-new-low-%E2%80%98heaven-real-cover">Heaven Is Real, According to Science.</a></p><p>Yes, that was an actual, for-real Newsweek cover this year: "Heaven Is Real." It was the dumbest, probably, but not actually the worst. This year's Newsweek covers also included <a href="http://www.now.org/issues/media/hall-of-shame/index.php/violence-against-women/newsweek-glamorizes-women-s-submission">naked bondage lady</a>, and <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/184397/newsweeks-asparagus-cover-only-the-latest-recycling/">sexy lady about to fellate asparagus</a> (a stock image that had also quite recently been used in at least two other magazines). There was <a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/216792/newsweeks-creepy-princess-diana-cover">"what if Princess Di was alive and my friend,"</a> too, but that was from 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_3_newsweek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 4: The Sunday Shows</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where the same few hacks and camera-seeking lawmakers have the same discussions every. single. week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Every Sunday morning, the big four broadcast networks all air their FCC-mandated "public affairs" programming, which consists of a host (a white guy) interviewing the same dozen lawmakers, journalists and pundits in a rotating order. The lawmakers are usually not the most powerful members of Congress -- often they're somewhat marginal figures in terms of influence, in fact -- and the pundits and journalists all generally share the same, or very similar, worldviews. The only people I actually know who watch these things <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/sunday-morning-talk-shows">do so out of professional obligation.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_4_the_sunday_shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 5: The Drudge Report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Drudge Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inaccurate as always, but thankfully more irrelevant than ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Shortly after noon on Nov. 6, Time's Mark Halperin <a href="https://twitter.com/MarkHalperin/status/265873281272401920">posted this on Twitter:</a> "When John Harris &amp; I wrote 'Drudge rules our world,' we were describing what IS, not what ought to be. Doubters already proven wrong today." A few hours later Barack Obama won reelection, which I assume came as a shock to people who do get most of their news from Matt Drudge.</p><p>Here's a brief tour of 2012 as the Drudge Report covered it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_5_the_drudge_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 7: The Huffington Post</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arianna Huffington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The great liberal community's infuriating founder embraces both the center and the fringe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Arianna Huffington is brilliant. Her intellect is usually ignored by her detractors, who focus on her relentless ambition. Old-fashioned sexism taints so many pieces critical of Huffington that one sometimes feels a strong urge to defend her from the charge that she's cannibalizing and destroying American journalism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_7_the_huffington_post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 8: MSNBC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Joe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Russert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Believe it or not, the liberal answer to Fox actually makes for worse TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>MSNBC, we're told all the time, is the liberal Fox News. That's reductive and stupid. It isn't. MSNBC isn't the liberal Fox News for two very important reasons: It usually demonstrates a greater respect for the truth than Fox News, and it's <em>not as good as Fox News.</em> It's not as good at being liberal as Fox is at being conservative. Fox is rigidly ideologically consistent, with its "straight news" programs echoing the same talking points and pushing the same slanted stories as its opinion shows. While there's no doubt that MSNBC is more unapologetically liberal than it used to be, it's still all over the place, with a conservative anchoring its flagship morning show, objective Beltway "straight news" proponents like Chuck Todd and Andrea Mitchell dominating in the daytime, and weekends full of ... prison shows. But more important, it's not as good as Fox at being compelling TV, which is why millions more people watch Fox every day. (There are demographic reasons for Fox's advantage, too, but it's still a huge number.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_8_msnbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 9: The Atlantic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The eternally unsurprising magazine may just be an excuse for the obscene "Ideas" events]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Magazines are great. I am a big fan of magazines. The Atlantic does a lot of things right, as a magazine. First of all, it makes money. Most magazines don't, really. I also give them credit for "figuring out The Web." Here is the secret of The Web: People like to read thoughtful people writing about and debating the issues of the day, and also they like really infuriating trolling. The Atlantic gives them both.</p><p>Here are some pieces <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/toc/2012/12/">from the latest issue</a>: Jeffrey Goldberg on why more guns will solve gun control (counterintuitive!), Jessica Bennett and Rachel Simmons on how writing "xoxo" in emails is "feminizing the workplace," something on wacky Silicon Valley workspaces and offices. This is a fairly representative sample of the sort of thing in your average issue of the Atlantic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_9_the_atlantic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 10: New York Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Friedman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Kristof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're kicking off our annual list with the best paper in the country -- which could do a lot better than these two]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>The New York Times is America's Last Newspaper, and because of that it is the recipient of a lot of grief that it doesn't always entirely deserve. Conservatives think it's the Daily Worker. Liberals blame it for Iraq and Bush's second term. Young people refuse to pay to read it.</p><p>The truth is, it is a good newspaper. It has great reporting that it spends a bunch of money on. It has a crossword puzzle. It has David Carr.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/salons_2012_hack_list_10_the_new_york_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 6: CNN</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiolf Blitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john king]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The flailing cable news pioneer could be less dumb if it wanted to be -- but it doesn\'t want to be]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Maybe we beat up on poor CNN too often. I have previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/28/cnn_cant_even_do_breaking_news_right_anymore/">bemoaned CNN's inability to get breaking news right</a>, offered <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/30/how_to_save_cnn/">advice on how to save the network</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/cnn_hires_failed_gimmick_king_jeff_zucker/">offered constructive criticism of their decision to hire Jeff Zucker</a>. CNN was also well represented in 2011's Hack List, with <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/15/15_wolf_blitzer/">Wolf Blitzer</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/8_piers_morgan/">Piers Morgan</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/6_erick_erickson/">Erick Erickson</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/4_erin_burnett/">Erin Burnett</a> all making appearances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/hack_list_no_6_cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;re stuck with guns. But&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/what_if_gun_control_is_impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/what_if_gun_control_is_impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That doesn't mean we can't ban some, make them a lot harder to get -- and maybe even tax the hell out of them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Effective gun control in America is impossible. It's impossible for a million different reasons, some of them new, many of them very old, but it's impossible all the same. It's impossible because of our courts, our history, our culture, and, most significantly, our surfeit of guns. There are just too goddamn many guns in the United States to make it difficult for crazy or dangerous people to obtain one, or many.</p><p>America <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/08/09/politics/btn-guns-in-america/index.html">is home to 310 million nonmilitary firearms.</a> That's nearly one gun for every resident of the country, or just about three for each "household."</p><p>Gun control legislation powerful enough to make obtaining guns difficult enough to dissuade criminals from using them would, I think, require Prohibition-like manpower and government expenditures. It'd be as impossible a task as ending recreational marijuana usage. With lots of time and money you could make some progress toward a gun-free America. You might think it's worth it. Lots of people would agree. More Americans wouldn't. Even <em>registering</em> all of America's guns would be a massive, hugely expensive undertaking, as Canada learned <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Firearms_Registry#Cost_overruns">a decade ago.</a> And it would meet fierce, hysterical resistance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/what_if_gun_control_is_impossible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/what_if_gun_control_is_impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>208</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain will hound Susan Rice to the ends of the earth (or just the Senate Foreign Relations Committee)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The angry "maverick" seeks a seat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to continue his Susan Rice crusade]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grouchy old Sen. John "Walnuts!" McCain is always mad, and usually there is one thing in particular that he is mad at at a time. Like <a href="http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/1998-02-12/news/john-mccain-breaks-up-a-fight/">for a while it was Ultimate Fighting</a>, for some reason. No one knew why, but he devoted literally all of his time as a senator to eradicating it, until a new thing made him mad and he just completely and totally forgot about UFC. Then for a long time the thing he was mad at was "George W. Bush," and that's when everyone grew to love him, but then he moved on from that, too, and he was mad at Iran for a little while, but mostly it's just been Barack Obama, for the last few years, who really gets his goat. Now he's narrowed his focus further, and the one thing in this world that he hates most is the prospect of Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice becoming secretary of state.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/john_mccain_will_hound_susan_rice_to_the_ends_of_the_earth_or_just_the_senate_foreign_relations_committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s make Obama regret his war on weed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's Justice Department won't let Washington and Colorado smoke up in peace. Can we change his mind?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has pissed off the stoners again. He always does. In 2009 <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/26/obama-takes-pot-legalizat_n_179563.html">a question about marijuana legalization made him laugh</a>, a hard to miss sign that he didn't take the issue seriously. Worse than laughter has been his DEA, and its <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/inside-obama-s-war-on-weed.html">increasingly heavy-handed war on legal marijuana dispensaries.</a> Now that <em>recreational</em> marijuana has been legalized in Colorado and Washington, his Department of Justice is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html?_r=0">weighing its options</a>, and, reportedly, none of their options seem to be "just let people smoke their marijuana, because it's harmless."</p><p>Instead the feds are either looking to have a judge declare the state regulations invalid, or are out to browbeat states into recriminalizing the demon weed by withholding federal money. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act_of_1984">A similar strategy</a> got the drinking age raised to 21 in every state, though it required legislation.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I went on a freaking cruise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/i_went_on_a_freaking_cruise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/i_went_on_a_freaking_cruise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruise ships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vacation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caribbean]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I spent a week on an environmentally disastrous post-industrial American extravagance. And it was kind of amazing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the week of Thanksgiving, I was on a cruise. The idea of my going on a week-long cruise provoked a seemingly endless series of smirks and scoffs from everyone I told beforehand. I am not exactly the cruise ship type. Cruises, as we all know, are environmentally disastrous post-industrial American extravagances, bloated and vulgar parodies of the classy transatlantic voyages of yesteryear, with more than a touch of colonialism in the way they deposit their hordes of rich passengers on poor islands, making small economies dependent on their tourism dollars but keeping the vast majority of them for the fantastically profitable companies that own the boats. Cruises are gross and weird and I was sure I would hate going on one.</p><p>When I agreed to write about my time At Sea, I did so knowing that it is unwise to invite comparison to the beloved author of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Supposedly_Fun_Thing_I'll_Never_Do_Again">That One Essay everyone mentions</a> when you tell them you are going on a cruise. I've read it, of course, though not in 10 years, at least. I'm not half the writer that the author of that particular beloved piece was, though I think I'm perhaps better able to enjoy myself than he was. (Though not without assistance, as my bar bill showed by the end of the week.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/i_went_on_a_freaking_cruise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/i_went_on_a_freaking_cruise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan Simpson spins Jon Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/alan_simpson_spins_jon_stewart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/alan_simpson_spins_jon_stewart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowles-Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alan Simpson, half of Washington's favorite austerity team, hits "The Daily Show" and receives a sloppy wet kiss]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crusty old Alan Simpson is on a crusade to get today's youth to care about the deficit as much as he does. It isn't easy, because the kids today are all too busy playing Mario Kart on their XBoxes and listening to Ke$ha on their Zunes and "dropping ecstasy" at their "rainbow parties" and Icing Bros and "ghostriding the whip" and cyberbullying to concern themselves with matters as grave as our national debt. But Simpson is determined to get them to care, and to prove he's "with it," he's recently done the two things today's "Millennials" love best: the Gangnam Style dance and appearing on Comedy Central's "The Daily Show."</p><p>The Gangnam dance thing was done on behalf of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/new_group_americas_youth_cry_out_for_sensible_moderate_deficit_reduction/">a transparently phony Pete Peterson-funded "youth organization" operated by old rich people</a>, and you really don't need to see the stupid video. The "Daily Show" interview aired last night, and it was depressing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/alan_simpson_spins_jon_stewart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/alan_simpson_spins_jon_stewart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>