<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Alex Seitz-Wald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_seitz_wald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:55:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who is the Democrats&#8217; Ted Cruz?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Ryan to Paul, GOP is loaded with national figures under 50. Dems seemingly have no one to rival them in 2020]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Hillary Clinton the runaway favorite as the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee (should she run), Republicans are already making clear that they will <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/30/us/politics/republicans-paint-clinton-as-old-news-for-2016-presidential-election.html?hp&amp;_r=0">focus attention on her age</a>, reports Jonathan Martin of the New York Times. Clinton will be nearly 70 if she runs in three years, "a generation removed from most of the possible Republican candidates." As <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/07/01/the-ageist-attack-on-hillary.html">Mike Tomasky</a> and <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113715/hillary-old-news-tack-worked-obama-it-wont-gop">Alec MacGillis</a> wrote Monday, the attacks could backfire -- and Karl Rove's notion that the GOP will capture a large portion of the youth vote because of Clinton's age is laughable.</p><p>But the attack does reveal a key weakness in today's Democratic Party that could haunt it for the next decade or more -- it has a relatively barren farm system of young up-and-comers. The party could easily survive 2016 with Clinton at the top of the ticket, but what about subsequent cycles?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/democrats_have_an_age_problem_but_its_not_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News adopts George Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trayvon Martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Zimmerman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outside his legal team, few have done more to help Trayvon Martin's shooter than Sean Hannity. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case may be Florida v. George Zimmerman, but it might more aptly be called Florida v. George Zimmerman and the conservative media, as the accused killer has found devoted defenders on the airwaves of Fox News and in the digital pages of conservative blogs.</p><p>Few outside Zimmerman's defense team have done more to help him than Sean Hannity, who on Friday declared that Zimmerman had already won the trial. "As far as I'm concerned, <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/06/28/hannity-declares-zimmerman-trial-over/194679">this case is over</a>," the Fox host said after playing testimony from a witness who said he saw Trayvon Martin beating Zimmerman "MMA style." The day before that, Hannity said on his radio show that the judge should dismiss manslaughter, let alone the second-degree murder charges.</p><p>"So the question is why are we here? And the answer to that question is purely political. Politics influenced the decision, the media influenced the decision," Hannity <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/06/28/hannity-argues-judge-should-dismiss-murder-case/194674">said</a>, succinctly revealing why the conservative media has found itself vocally defending someone who admitted to killing teenager Trayvon Martin. It goes like this: Liberals and the media made hay out of the fact that Zimmerman was initially not charged in the killing of Martin. Liberals and the media are bad. Therefore, Zimmerman must be good.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/right_wing_media_adopts_george_zimmerman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>371</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul&#8217;s code switching</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/rand_pauls_code_switching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/rand_pauls_code_switching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the libertarian senator likes gay marriage one minute and hates it the next]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican Sen. Rand Paul got himself in a spot of trouble this week after speaking out of both sides of his mouth on gay marriage. When speaking to a national audience, via <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/06/rand-paul-on-gay-mmarriage-gop-needs-to-agree-to-disagree/">ABC News' Jeff Zeleny</a>, the Republican senator seemed unconcerned: He praised Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion striking down the Defense of Marriage Act for avoiding “a cultural war" and letting the states "agree to disagree."</p><p>But when speaking to a more conservative audience in an <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/06/27/rand-paul-invokes-bestiality-while-discussing-gay-marriage-walks-it-back/">interview</a> with Glenn Beck, Paul warned that changing marriage laws could lead to bestiality: “It is difficult, because if we have no laws on this, people will take it to one extension further -- does it have to be humans?”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/rand_pauls_code_switching/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/rand_pauls_code_switching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let Geller in!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/let_geller_in/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/let_geller_in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Geller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Spencer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The British government's decision to ban the activist is a win for Islamophobia and a loss for free speech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's no secret that we <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pam_geller_banned_from_the_uk/">vehemently disagree with</a> anti-Muslim activist and blogger Pam Geller -- and the feeling is mutual. "As for Islamic apologists like Alex Seitz-Wald, it is only a matter of time before he is <a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/salon-smears-freedom-fighting-candidates-with-geller-.html">getting measured for a suicide vest</a>," she once wrote about this writer. But British authorities made a big mistake this week in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pam_geller_banned_from_the_uk/singleton/">banning her and fellow activist Robert Spencer from entering the country</a>, ceding to her the moral high ground and striking a blow against free speech.</p><p>"It will merely make them free speech martyrs, despite their abhorrent views," <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jillian_York">Jillian York</a>, the Director of International Freedom of Expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation said in an email.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/let_geller_in/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/let_geller_in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IRS scandal is Republicans&#8217; zombie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/irs_scandal_is_republicans_zombie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/irs_scandal_is_republicans_zombie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using a letter from the Treasury Inspector General, the GOP revives the scandal for another day -- but barely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like a "zeke" in "World War Z" that just won't die, the IRS scandal <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/06/irs-scandal-letter-sandy-levin/66651/">lives another day</a>. We <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/darrell_issas_credibility_is_over/">declared it dead</a> on Monday -- based on the information we had at the time -- after we learned that the IRS had targeted progressive and Occupy groups in addition to Tea Party ones.</p><p>But today, Treasury Department Inspector General Russell George explained in <a href="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/150374099/content?start_page=1&amp;view_mode=scroll&amp;show_recommendations=true">a letter</a> to lawmakers that while some liberal groups got extra scrutiny, they weren't systematically targeted like conservative ones were. "We found no indication in any of these other materials that 'Progressives' was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention," the IG wrote. While 100 percent of applications for groups with "Tea Party," "Patriot" or "9/12" in their name were processed as "potential political cases," just 30 percent of progressive ones were.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/irs_scandal_is_republicans_zombie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/irs_scandal_is_republicans_zombie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>187</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do we love fugitives so much?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[O.J. Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitey Bulger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fugitive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robin Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason bourne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christopher dorner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Snowden and Whitey Bulger, to Jesse James and Dorner, here's why we treat outlaws on the run as heroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">No matter what you think of Edward Snowden, it's undeniable that the former CIA computer whiz has a committed fan base across the globe, as he continues to evade authorities in a high-tech, high-stakes global manhunt. Offering all the political intrigue and personal drama of the "Bourne Identity" series with the benefit of being real, he’s already become a folk hero -- not just to online activists who worry about an increasingly omniscient surveillance state, but to many ordinary Americans.</p><p dir="ltr">In this way, Snowden is a quintessential American outlaw hero, albeit updated for the modern era. With many Americans cheering him on as he evades the law -- moving from Hong Kong to Moscow and possibly some other nation, seemingly outwitting the U.S. government all the while --  it echoes the reception many other fugitives like Whitey Bulger, O.J. Simpson (during the famous Bronco chase), and Bucky Phillips all received.</p><p dir="ltr">All of which raises a key question: Why do Americans so often root for outlaws on the run?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/why_do_we_root_for_fugitives_to_evade_capture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alex Jones: Gay marriage truther?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/that_time_alex_jones_said_the_government_is_turning_people_gay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/that_time_alex_jones_said_the_government_is_turning_people_gay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conspiracy theorist said the government is turning people gay through chemical warfare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before the Supreme Court overturned the Defense of Marriage Act, conspiracy broadcaster Alex Jones was warning his viewers that the government was turning people gay by putting chemicals in their juice boxes, water bottles and potato chip bags that feminized men.</p><p>"The reason there are so many gay people now is because it's a chemical warfare operation," Jones <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2w2TRxSLxw">said</a> in a June 2010 clip that has gained renewed attention since the DOMA ruling. "I have the government documents where they said they're going to encourage homosexuality with chemicals so people don't have children."</p><p>Cutting open a juice box to reveal the nefarious plastic lining laced with "estrogen mimickers," Jones continued, "After you're done drinking your little juices, you're ready to go out and have a baby. You're ready to put makeup on, you're ready to wear a short skirt." While there is some <a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/03/02/134196209/study-most-plastics-leach-hormone-like-chemicals">research</a> that suggests plastics leach hormone-like chemicals, there's no evidence that they're harmful to one's health or that the government is involved in a secret plot to turn the country gay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/that_time_alex_jones_said_the_government_is_turning_people_gay/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/that_time_alex_jones_said_the_government_is_turning_people_gay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner&#8217;s DOMA backfire</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/boehners_doma_backfire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/boehners_doma_backfire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The speaker's decision to spend $2.3 million defending DOMA was a political loser and maybe even counterproductive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Speaker John Boehner's decision to use taxpayer dollars to defend the Defense of Marriage Act after the Obama administration determined it was unconstitutional may go down as the Gettysburg of the Lost Cause of Traditional Marriage on Capitol Hill -- and may have even contributed to DOMA's demise.</p><p>The fight will continue in the states, and conservative Republicans may even keep up the fight in Congress, but leadership is ready to throw in the towel. "While I am obviously disappointed in the ruling, it is always critical that we protect our system of checks and balances," Boehner told reporters today after the Supreme Court struck down DOMA. "A robust national debate over marriage will continue in the public square, and it is my hope that states will define marriage as the union between one man and one woman." States, not Congress.</p><p>“It sounds to me that that battle will be moving to the states,” John Cornyn, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate, said. Eric Cantor hit the same tone, adding, "the marriage debate will continue in the states." "Congressional Republican leaders are speaking with resounding unity: the same-sex marriage fight <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/gay-marriage-supreme-court-decision-republican-response-93423.html">is ending on Capitol Hill</a>," Politico's Jake Sherman and Ginger Gibson reported today.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/boehners_doma_backfire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/boehners_doma_backfire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthony Kennedy: &#8220;The first gay justice&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at the often inscrutable jurist who cast the key vote against DOMA -- and cemented a legacy of LGBT rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice Anthony Kennedy has long relished his role as the swing vote on the Supreme Court -- and perhaps no more so than today, when, with his decision to make a 5-4 majority to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act, he single-handedy helped extend legal and economic benefits to millions of Americans, change the course of American history and crystallize his legacy in the pantheon of civil rights agents.</p><p>“If Bill Clinton was ‘the first black president,’ Anthony Kennedy has now firmly secured his place in history as ‘the first gay justice,'" said former Kennedy clerk Michael Dorf, who now teaches law at Cornell.</p><p>Kennedy has often confounded liberals and conservatives alike with his unpredictable decision-making. "On most cases of great moment, the intellectual battlefield of the Supreme Court has shrunk to the space between this one man's ears," Time magazine's Massimo Calabresi and David Von Drehle wrote in their <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2116699,00.html">2010 profile</a> of the justice.</p><p>But on gay rights, Kennedy is atypically consistent. "As the author of Romer v. Evans, Lawrence v. Texas and now United States v. Windsor, Justice Kennedy makes clear that he not only accepts, but welcomes the task of writing majestic opinions affirming the dignity of gay persons and couples," Dorf added.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/anthony_kennedy_the_first_gay_justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Late June has a deep pro-LGBT history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonewall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's rulings coincide with other important dates in the fight for equality: Stonewall and Lawrence v. Texas ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With two landmark Supreme Court rulings, today's date will undoubtedly be added to the canonical dates of the struggle for LGBT equality, made all the more meaningful by its close proximity to the anniversary of the Stonewall riots, which gave birth to the gay rights movement in America almost exactly 44 years ago, and the Supreme Court's first major pro-equality decision 10 years ago today.</p><p>Shortly after midnight on June 28, 1969, police in New York <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots">raided</a> the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village, arresting and harassing the gay clientele. It was like countless previous police raids on gay clubs until a series of escalating events led to open rebellion in the Village, and sparked the beginning of the gay equality movement. A year later, June 28 marked the first Gay Pride protests in a handful of major cities. To this day, most Pride rallies, including those in other countries, are still held at the end of June in honor of Stonewall, and this weekend's festivities in San Francisco, New York and other cities promise to be all the more buoyant, given the Supreme Court's rulings.</p><p>Coincidentally, today also marks the 10-year anniversary of the day the Supreme Court handed down its landmark ruling in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas">Lawrence v. Texas</a>, which struck down anti-sodomy laws. It was an early victory in a string of legal advances for LGBT equality, leading to today's.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/the_supreme_courts_auspicious_timing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pam Geller banned from the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pam_geller_banned_from_the_uk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pam_geller_banned_from_the_uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pam Geller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sharia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British officials will prohibit the anti-Muslim activist from attending a far-right march ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Islamophobic activist and blogger Pam Geller has been banned from the United Kingdom, according to documents from the country's top law enforcement officer <a href="http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/06/banned-in-britian-uk-caves-to-jihad.html">posted on Geller's blog</a>. Geller, along with fellow activist Robert Spencer, had <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23004858">planned to join</a> a rally hosted by the far-right <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_Defence_League">English Defense League</a>, but Home Secretary Theresa May personally decided to exclude Geller under the country's "Unacceptable Behavior policy."</p><p>Geller replied in a typically flamboyant fashion:</p><blockquote><p>In a striking blow against freedom, the British government has banned us from entering the country. Muhammad al-Arifi, who has advocated Jew-hatred, wife-beating, and jihad violence, entered the U.K. recently with no difficulty. In not allowing us into the country solely because of our true and accurate statements about Islam, the British government is behaving like a de facto Islamic state. The nation that gave the world the Magna Carta is dead.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pam_geller_banned_from_the_uk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/pam_geller_banned_from_the_uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Actually, even the Flat Earth Society believes in climate change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, such a group exists. It thinks the world is flat -- but also getting warmer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his big speech on climate change today, President Obama mocked Republicans who deny the existence of man-made global warming by derisively referring to them as members of "the Flat Earth Society."</p><p>"We don't have time for a meeting of the Flat Earth Society," Obama <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/307655-obama-we-dont-have-time-for-a-meeting-of-the-flat-earth-society">said</a>. "Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it's not going to protect you from the coming storm."</p><p>As it turns out, there is a real <a href="http://theflatearthsociety.org/cms/">Flat Earth Society</a> and its president thinks that anthropogenic climate change is real. In an email to Salon, president <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2010/feb/23/flat-earth-society">Daniel Shenton</a> said that while he "can't speak for the Society as a whole regarding climate change," he personally thinks the evidence suggests fossil fuel usage is contributing to global warming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/flat_earth_society_believes_in_climate_change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Obama just kill Keystone XL?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse-gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[350.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not necessarily, but his new policy makes it less likely the administration will approve the pipeline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just ahead of the president's big speech on climate change, the Huffington Post's Sam Stein <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/25/obama-keystone_n_3497292.html?1372180768">breaks the news</a> that President Obama will ask Secretary of State John Kerry to reject the Keystone XL pipeline if State finds the pipeline increases carbon emissions. It's huge news that took environmentalists completely by surprise. They didn't expect the president to address Keystone in his speech -- he's avoided discussing the pipeline at all since issuing an executive order to have State study the environmental impact some time ago.</p><p>So is this the end of Keystone? Stein says the "policy somewhat splits the difference -- not killing the project outright, but ensuring that it meets a basic environmental standard."</p><p>Environmentalists are thrilled, but reserving a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/take_obamas_climate_announcement_skeptically/">healthy skepticism</a> because there's still a big "if" here.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/did_obama_just_kill_keystone_xl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darrell Issa&#8217;s credibility is over</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/darrell_issas_credibility_is_over/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/darrell_issas_credibility_is_over/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast and Furious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solyndra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After string of exaggerations and distortions, the latest blows to his fake IRS scandal should make him irrelevant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals have naturally never much cared for Darrell Issa, but after he seized on a Treasury Department inspector general report that appeared to show the agency had improperly singled out Tea Party tax-exempt groups for extra scrutiny, even we<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/conspiracy_theorists_flummoxed_in_face_of_actual_scandals/"> thought</a> he might be on to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/lois_lerner_irs_disaster/">something</a>. Jon Stewart <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/obamas_cronkite_moment/">practically disowned</a> the president. After a long string of failures, it looked like Issa had finally found something real, even if he was a bit overeager in hyping it.</p><p>How wrong we were. Now it's clear Issa played us this whole time, thanks to new documents that show the IRS <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_much_kills_the_irs_scandal/singleton/">also targeted</a> "progressive" and "Occupy" groups, in addition to Tea Party ones. And if it targeted groups on both sides, it wasn't really singling anyone out (the only group actually denied tax-exempt status was a progressive one, after all) and the whole scandal falls apart.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/darrell_issas_credibility_is_over/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/darrell_issas_credibility_is_over/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>226</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before you get excited about Obama&#8217;s climate speech&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/take_obamas_climate_announcement_skeptically/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/take_obamas_climate_announcement_skeptically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president has a habit of under-delivering on environmental promises. Here's what he won't say in today's speech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Later today, President Obama will give what's being billed <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-to-take-sweeping-action-on-climate/2013/06/22/d28de366-db77-11e2-a9f2-42ee3912ae0e_story.html">as a major new speech</a> on climate change, where he's expected to announce a series of new measures the administration will take that don't need congressional approval to curb greenhouse gas emissions.</p><p>It's a welcome and overdue move, but those who believe in science should probably keep their optimism guarded and praise conditional for the moment, considering <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/obamas_climate_change_promises_an_incomplete_history/">Obama's habit of promising big and delivering smaller</a> when it comes to climate.</p><p>"This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal," he famously (or infamously) said when accepting the Democratic nomination <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/03/obamas-nomination-victory_n_105028.html">five years ago</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/take_obamas_climate_announcement_skeptically/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/take_obamas_climate_announcement_skeptically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This pretty much kills the IRS scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_much_kills_the_irs_scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_much_kills_the_irs_scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The scandal has been a fiction all along as new documents show the IRS targeted liberal groups as well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the IRS scandal? How the tax agency improperly singled out Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny in a nefarious political vendetta against conservatives because the agency is either <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/2430839609001/political-standing-of-irs-staff-to-blame-for-scandal/">inherently liberal</a> or was <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/02/darrell-issa-irs-_n_3374592.html">acting on orders</a> from the Democratic President? Remember how <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/dumbest_irs_theory_yet/">it cost even Mitt Romney the election</a>?</p><p>Well, as it turns out, that whole scandal is entirely bogus. False. A fiction. The entire notion that the agency singled out groups with "Tea Party" in their name in simply wrong, we learn today, thanks to new documents revealed by the Associated Press. The documents, and confirmation from officials, show the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/irs_chief_tea_party_wasnt_the_only_group_inappropriately_targeted_ap/">IRS targeted groups</a> with other keywords in their names, including "Progressive” and “Occupy.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_much_kills_the_irs_scandal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_much_kills_the_irs_scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>190</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snowden won&#8217;t find a beacon of civil rights in Ecuador</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/snowden_wont_find_a_beacon_of_civil_rights_in_ecuador/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/snowden_wont_find_a_beacon_of_civil_rights_in_ecuador/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblower]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does he risk losing goodwill by allying with a president known for his "widespread repression" of the media?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alliances of convenience with unsavory governments are nothing new in international politics, but they would seem to be the kind of moral relativism that recently teamed-up Edward Snowden and Julian Assange might revile -- so it's worth digging a bit deeper into the much-discussed irony about the two idealists taking refuge under the wings of Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa. Assange <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/assange_snowden_en_route_to_ecuador/">told reporters today</a> that NSA leaker Snowden is en route to Ecuador, while the WikiLeaks founder himself has been holed up in Ecuador's embassy in London for months.</p><p>The two say they are motivated by a desire to expose human rights and civil liberties violations by the American government, but allying with Correa is like jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire. Many have cursorily noted that Ecuador has a poor record when it comes to freedom of the press, but a closer inspection is even more troubling.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/snowden_wont_find_a_beacon_of_civil_rights_in_ecuador/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/snowden_wont_find_a_beacon_of_civil_rights_in_ecuador/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assange: Snowden en route to Ecuador</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/assange_snowden_en_route_to_ecuador/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/assange_snowden_en_route_to_ecuador/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecuador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asylum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refugees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WikiLeaks founder says the NSA leaker is in a safe place,  but declines to reveal his location]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said on a conference call with reporters this morning that NSA leaker Edward Snowden left Russia for Ecuador Sunday, hoping to gain asylum in the country whose London Embassy is currently giving shelter to Assange. Snowden sought legal and logistical help from Wikileaks after it became clear he would have to leave Honk Kong, applying for asylum in both Ecuador and Iceland.</p><p>The WikiLeaks founder said Snowden is "safe and healthy," but would not reveal his location, saying only that the leaker left Hong Kong on refugee travel documents issued by the Ecuadorian government after the U.S. revoked his passport. WikiLeaks paid for his travel.</p><p>Snowden was expected to make the move, but slipped past reporters who expected him on a flight from Moscow to Havana, Cuba, which may have been a ruse intended to evade the media or American intelligence agencies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/assange_snowden_en_route_to_ecuador/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/assange_snowden_en_route_to_ecuador/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Howard Kurtz &amp; Fox News: A true love story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Kurtz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cable News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purported media critic has long treated the "fair and balanced" network with awe and romance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News and Howard Kurtz may be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/howard_kurtz_joins_foxs_board_of_journalism_ethics_experts/singleton/">a good match</a> not only because the conservative news network has become a stable for journalists who have fallen on hard times, but because the former Daily Beast Washington bureau chief has long been more generous to the network than many of his fellow media critics.</p><p>Not surprisingly, Fox has often come in for a drubbing from media <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k7t_vaduSTQ">watchdogs</a> for its often conservative, narrative-driven news coverage. But Kurtz, while occasionally willing to call foul on Fox, is generally pretty credulous of the cable news channel, defending it during controversies, favorably profiling its personalities, and seemingly overlooking its lapses.</p><p>John Cook at Gawker <a href="http://gawker.com/congratulations-to-howard-kurtz-on-his-new-job-521665864">pointed this out</a>, suggesting that Kurtz may have scooped him in 2004 at the behest of a News Corp. PR agent, and pointing to some other examples:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/22/howard_kurtz_fox_news_a_true_love_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The government&#8217;s toothless privacy watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board has hardly any staff and doesn't even have a website]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama today is meeting with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_and_Civil_Liberties_Oversight_Board">Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board</a>, an independent government entity responsible for acting as a sort of ombudsman against government overreach when it comes to things like the National Security Agency's collection of telephone metadata for millions of Americans.</p><p>If you've never heard of the PCLOB, you're not alone. We hadn't either, and that's probably because the Bush and Obama administrations have done everything they can to keep it that way. As <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/regwatch/administration/306989-obama-privacy-oversight-board-to-meet-for-first-time">the Hill's Justin Sink reports</a>, the board was created eight years ago on the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, but has "remained largely powerless" thanks to White House obstruction. Indeed, this is one of the board's first meetings, as Sink reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/the_governments_toothless_privacy_watchdog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>