<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Alex Seitz-Wald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_seitz_wald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 02:41:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup: Obama braces for impact</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On "Meet the Press," Obama finally lays responsibility for the fiscal cliff mess on Republicans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In clearest sign yet that President Obama has abandoned hope of averting the so-called fiscal cliff in the next 48 hours, he used a rare-Sunday show appearance to come out swinging at Republicans, something he’s so far avoided doing so as to not poison relations with his negotiating partners.</p><p>On “Meet the Press” today, all pretense was gone and diplomacy jettisoned as Obama placed the blame for a potential cliff dive squarely on Republican intransigence. “The only thing I would caution against, David, is I think this notion of, ‘Well, both sides are just kind of unwilling to cooperate.’ And that's just not true,” Obama told host David Gregory.</p><p>“I mean if you look at the facts, what you have is a situation here where the Democratic Party, warts and all, and certainly me, warts and all, have consistently done our best to try to put country first,” he added, paraphrasing John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign slogan. The clear implication: Republicans have <em>not</em> put country first, prioritizing ideology instead.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/sunday_show_roundup_obama_braces_for_impact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad deal: The White House&#8217;s last-ditch plan stinks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/bad_deal_the_white_houses_plan_stinks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/bad_deal_the_white_houses_plan_stinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's final proposal to House Republicans is a travesty. We're better off going over the "fiscal cliff"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This afternoon, President Obama is meeting with congressional leaders in a last-ditch attempt to avoid going over the so-called fiscal cliff. Most people in Washington think the effort is futile. That’s probably good thing, as going over the cliff is better than enacting the deal the White House is reportedly putting on the table at the summit.</p><p>While the details are sketchy and reports conflicting, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/29/us/politics/key-meeting-looms-as-scaled-back-fiscal-deal-is-explored.html?hp">according to the New York Times</a>, the proposal would extend the Bush tax cuts up to $400,000 (instead of the $250,000 most Democrats want), and it would extend some important tax credits, but it would leave the estate tax as is, do nothing about the sequester (the automatic spending cuts that will go into effect January 1) and do nothing about the debt ceiling.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/bad_deal_the_white_houses_plan_stinks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/bad_deal_the_white_houses_plan_stinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real lesson in David Gregory&#8217;s gun incident</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david gregory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun laws are so easy to break -- and such a state-by-state mess -- that it's hard for any jurisdiction to get tough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Meet the Press" host David Gregory is in hot water after brandishing a 30-round magazine for an assault rifle on national TV last Sunday while interviewing NRA head Wayne LaPierre, apparently unaware that the District of Columbia, where he filmed the segment, bans such equipment. Other journalists have <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/12/disdain-for-the-david-gregory-story-152840.html">scoffed</a> at the controversy, and even the NRA has dismissed it as “<a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/nra-head-gregorys-silly-felony-85531.html?hp=r14">silly</a>,” but D.C. police are apparently taking the matter seriously, saying they are <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/12/25/washington-d-c-police-investigating-whether-nbc-moderator-violated-law/">investigating</a> the incident.</p><p>“I really think what David Gregory did while he was inadvertently flouting the law was illustrating in a very graphic, perhaps not intentionally, but in a graphic way <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/nra-head-gregorys-silly-felony-85531.html#ixzz2GLYc92gg">just how silly some of these laws are</a>,” NRA President David Keene said yesterday. We don’t often say this, but the NRA is absolutely right.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_real_lesson_in_david_gregorys_gun_incident/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Arpaio accepted award from neo-Confederate group</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/joe_arpaio_accepted_award_from_neo_confederate_group/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/joe_arpaio_accepted_award_from_neo_confederate_group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confederacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederate flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exclusive: The infamous sheriff "gratefully accepted" an award from the Sons of Confederate Veterans last year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio was denying <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2011/1222/Is-Sheriff-Joe-Arpaio-using-racial-profiling-to-find-illegal-immigrants">allegations</a> of racial profiling last year, he was accepting an award from <a href="http://www.scv.org/whatis.php">The Sons of Confederate Veterans</a> (SCV), a controversial Confederate heritage group.</p><p>Two officials with the Arizona SCV division presented the group’s J. Edgar Hoover Law &amp; Order Award to Arpaio in his office in October of 2011. This has never been previously reported. “Sheriff Arpaio, a genial host (unless you’re in his jail!) gratefully accepted the award and, in return, gave Commander [Richard] Montgomery and Adjutant [Curt] Tipton some souvenirs of the visit, to include autographed posters, a photo and the infamous pink underwear!” according to <a href="http://azscv.org/newsletters/rebelyellfall2011.pdf">the Fall issue of the official newsletter</a> of the SCV’s Arizona Division, “The Rebel Yell.”</p><p>The newsletter of the Tucson “camp” adds that Arpaio <a href="http://www.tucson-scv.org/uploads/RD_10_2011.pdf">autographed photos</a> of the ceremony. Here’s a picture of Arpaio accepting the award from “Rebel Yell”:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/joe_arpaio_accepted_award_from_neo_confederate_group/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/joe_arpaio_accepted_award_from_neo_confederate_group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012: The year we all got high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2012 was a "watershed" year for marijuana reform -- and not just in Washington and Colorado]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If liberalizing marijuana laws becomes the next big social issue, we will have 2012 to thank for it, as this was the year that the issue finally moved from the fringes to the center of American politics.</p><p>“In the now nearly fifty-year-old effort to end cannabis prohibition laws led by non-profit citizen advocacy groups, 2012 must be viewed as a watershed year for cannabis law reformers,” said Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of NORML, a leading marijuana reform group.</p><p>Tom Angell, the chairman of Marijuana Majority, agreed. "This was the year that we broke through and succeeded in getting prominent political observers and the media to pay attention to the fact that this is quickly becoming a mainstream issue.”</p><p>The biggest victories for advocates, of course, came in Washington and Colorado, where voters approved ballot measures to legalize cannabis for private recreational use. Washington’s law has already gone into effect, while Colorado’s will soon. Advocates hope that if all goes according to plan, other states will see there’s nothing to be afraid of and follow the example.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/2012_the_year_we_all_got_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We hit the debt ceiling Monday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/treasury_adds_a_ceiling_to_the_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/treasury_adds_a_ceiling_to_the_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a surprise announcement on the debt ceiling, the landscape has shifted dramatically on the fiscal cliff]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just five days until we barrel over the fiscal cliff, the administration just deepened the metaphorical ravine by announcing this afternoon that the U.S. will hit the debt limit on December 31st, conveniently the same the day that a slew of tax cuts expire and a series of crippling spending cuts go into effect.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Documents/Sec%20Geithner%20LETTER%2012-26-2012%20Debt%20Limit.pdf">a letter to congressional leaders</a>, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner warned that the U.S. will hit the statutory borrowing limit on Monday, but his department will be able to stave off default by engaging in “extraordinary measures" to fund the government and pay off the debt for a brief period of time. Geithner said he could find about $200 billion in “headroom,” which would last about two months under “normal circumstances.” “However, given the significant uncertainty that now exists” with the fiscal cliff, he continued, “it is not possible to predict the effective duration of these measures.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/treasury_adds_a_ceiling_to_the_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/treasury_adds_a_ceiling_to_the_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News thinks anti-gay protesters are &#8220;left-wing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/fox_news_discovers_westboro_baptist_is_left_wing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/fox_news_discovers_westboro_baptist_is_left_wing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only in the bizarro universe of Fox Nation can an organization that thinks Obama's the Antichrist be liberal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you call an organization that despises gay people, hates Muslims and thinks Barack Obama is the Antichrist? If you’re Fox Nation, the spinoff website that's all Fox and none of the News, you call them “left-wing.” Or at least that’s what the site -- best known for attacking Obama’s “<a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/president-obama/2011/08/05/obama-parties-chris-rock-jay-z-and-whoopi-while-rome-burns">Hip-Hop Barbecue</a>” for creating no jobs (but featuring plenty of black people) -- called the Westboro Baptist Church, the notorious cult that pickets the funeral services of fallen soldiers.</p><p>When Westboro members planned to protest the funerals of children killed in the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, they were met by counter-protesters, including a group of bikers called the <a href="http://www.patriotguard.org/">Patriot Guard Riders</a>, which specifically organized to “shield the mourning family [of fallen servicemembers] and their friends from interruptions created by any protestor or group of protestors,” i.e., Westboro activists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/fox_news_discovers_westboro_baptist_is_left_wing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/fox_news_discovers_westboro_baptist_is_left_wing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA misleads on assault weapons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/banning_assault_weapons_works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/banning_assault_weapons_works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[assault weapons ban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't believe the NRA spin: The '94 assault weapons ban was full of loopholes, but studies prove it was effective]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Democrats <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/obama_will_back_feinsteins_bill_to_reinstate_assault_weapons_ban/">move to once again ban assault weapons</a> and NBC host David Gregory gets <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/did_david_gregory_break_gun_control_law_on_meet_the_press/singleton/">investigated</a> for using a high-capacity magazine, banned in D.C., as a prop in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/sunday_show_roundup_lapierre_wants_you_to_call_him_crazy/">his interview with the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre</a>, one key question still hasn’t been properly addressed by the media thus far -- did the 1994 Assault Weapon Ban actually work?</p><p>Even Gregory, who convincingly played a devil's advocate to LaPierre Sunday, was dismissive of its effect on Sunday. “I mean <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50283245/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/#.UNs1V4njlAx">the fact that that it just doesn't work</a> is still something that you're challenged by if you want to approach this legislation again,” he said of the ban to New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, a supporter of the ban.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/banning_assault_weapons_works/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/banning_assault_weapons_works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday show roundup: LaPierre wants you to call him crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/sunday_show_roundup_lapierre_wants_you_to_call_him_crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/sunday_show_roundup_lapierre_wants_you_to_call_him_crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday Best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday show roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday morning shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disagree with the head of the NRA? He welcomes your putdowns -- as a conservative tabloid labels him a "loon"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NRA head Wayne LaPierre finally had his chance to “Meet the Press” after refusing to take questions at his Friday press conference, and he used the opportunity to invite the world to call him crazy. "If it's crazy to call for armed officers in our schools to protect our children, then call me crazy,” he told the NBC show’s host David Gregory. The conservative New York Post had no problem going there, slapping LaPierre on its cover Saturday under the blaring headline, “<a href="http://24.media.tumblr.com/274e40269e06faffd55b716aa9fc53ac/tumblr_mfgetmJQ3V1rv4aqro1_1280.jpg">GUN NUT! NRA loon in bizarre rant over Newtown</a>.”</p><p>“It's the one thing that would keep people safe,” LaPierre continued of his plan, “I said what I honestly thought and...what hundreds of millions of people all over this country believe will actually make a difference." All the evidence available suggests putting armed guns in school is actually <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_the_nras_plan_wont_work/">not a particularly effective idea</a> (there was an armed Sheriff’s deputy in Columbine High School on the day of the shooting, for instance).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/sunday_show_roundup_lapierre_wants_you_to_call_him_crazy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/sunday_show_roundup_lapierre_wants_you_to_call_him_crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the NRA&#8217;s plan won&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_the_nras_plan_wont_work/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_the_nras_plan_wont_work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science and history show that the NRA's plan to flood schools with arms is ineffective -- and could be disastrous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we just laugh away the NRA's plan to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/nra_put_armed_police_officers_in_every_single_school_in_this_nation/">put armed guards (either police or volunteers) in every school in America</a>, it's worth at least asking: Would it even work? People who actually study gun violence were not impressed.</p><p>“The statement by the NRA is without any evidence that it would be effective,” said Dr. Fred Rivara, an epidemiologist at the University of Washington and the editor-in-chief of the pediatrics division of the Journal of the American Medical Association, in an email to Salon.</p><p>In fact, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/columbine.cd/Pages/DEPUTIES_TEXT.htm">there was an armed sheriff’s deputy at Columbine High School</a> the day of the shooting. There <a href="http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-armed-confronts-mall-shooter-183593571.html">was an armed citizen in the Clackamas Mall</a> in Oregon during a shooting earlier this month. There <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/human_nature/2011/01/friendly_firearms.html">was an armed citizen at the Gabby Giffords shooting</a> -- and he almost shot the unarmed hero who tackled shooter Jared Loughner. Virtually every university in the county already has its own police force. Virginia Tech had <a href="http://www.governor.virginia.gov/TempContent/techPanelReport-docs/FullReport.pdf">its own SWAT-like team</a>. As James Brady, Ronald Reagan’s former press secretary cum gun control advocate, often notes, he was shot along with the president, despite the fact that they were surrounded by dozens of heavily armed and well-trained Secret Service agents and police.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_the_nras_plan_wont_work/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_the_nras_plan_wont_work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protesters blocked from delivering petitions to NRA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/protesters_blocked_from_delivering_petitions_to_nra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/protesters_blocked_from_delivering_petitions_to_nra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Code Pink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gun control activists hoped to deliver a petition with over 235,000 signatures, but were kicked out by security]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While NRA head Wayne LaPierre called for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/nra_put_armed_police_officers_in_every_single_school_in_this_nation/">putting armed guards</a> in every school in America inside the Willard Intercontinental Hotel today in Washington, protesters outside tried to deliver <a href="http://www.credoaction.com/campaign/nra_stand_down/?rc=homepage">a petition signed by over 235,000</a> people calling for the gun lobby to suspend its lobbying efforts on gun control in the wake of the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting.</p><p>Naturally, the NRA was not too amenable to this, and hotel security escorted the protesters and their cardboard boxes filled with signatures to the street. Josh Nelson, an organizer with CREDO, which led the petition effort, said the activists had a simple message to the NRA: “We want them to stand down and get out of the way so Congress and the president can pass gun control legislation that will save lives.”</p><p>Nelson and several dozen volunteers had hoped to deliver the petitions to LaPierre and NRA staffers before the press conference. But when they entered the building, “the hotel staff informed us that it’s private property and that we are not welcome there, and they pushed us out the door,” he told Salon. He couldn't be sure that the NRA directed the staff to eject the protesters, or if the hotel was just doing its job to protect its clients.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/protesters_blocked_from_delivering_petitions_to_nra/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/protesters_blocked_from_delivering_petitions_to_nra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the media rehabilitating John Lott?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_is_the_media_rehabilitating_john_lott/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_is_the_media_rehabilitating_john_lott/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pro-gun economist was discredited in the early 2000s, but TV news -- even PBS -- still takes him seriously]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School, one man has represented the pro-gun argument in the media perhaps more than anyone else: <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/plank/111263/meet-john-lott-the-man-who-wants-teachers-carry-guns">John Lott</a>. Lott, an economist who first lent credence to the argument that the answer to gun violence is more guns, was a major presence in the gun control debate of the past two decades, before being sidelined by controversy. So his reappearance on TV news programs in the wake of the shooting is surprising.</p><p>Here’s what critics say about him. Lott <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2001/03/11/the-gun-crowd-s-guru.html">held</a> prestigious positions at Yale and the University of Chicago, where he published his groundbreaking book, "More Guns, Less Crime." In the early 2000s, his work fell into controversy for employing what some academic critics termed “<a href="http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2003/04/25/0426/">junk science</a>” and for various apparently <a href="http://www.kellogg.northwestern.edu/faculty/dranove/htm/Dranove/coursepages/Mgmt%20469/guns.pdf">fatal methodological flaws</a>. Later, he was <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2003/10/double-barreled-double-standards">unable to prove the existence of a study central to his thesis</a>. He was also caught using a fake <a href="http://reason.com/archives/2003/05/01/the-mystery-of-mary-rosh">“sockpuppet” persona</a> to defend his work and attack his critics online. “In most circles, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/the_answer_is_not_more_guns/">this goes down as fraud</a>,” Donald Kennedy, the then-editor of the prestigious journal Science wrote in an editorial. Even Michelle Malkin said Lott had shown an “extensive <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2003/02/05/the_other_lott_controversy/page/2">willingness to deceive</a> to protect and promote his work.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_is_the_media_rehabilitating_john_lott/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/why_is_the_media_rehabilitating_john_lott/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t trust the NRA&#8217;s Wayne LaPierre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/dont_trust_the_nras_wayne_lapierre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/dont_trust_the_nras_wayne_lapierre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy hook Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NRA head may have genuinely had a change of heart, but history suggests we should be wary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow morning, the NRA will break its silence on the Sandy Hook massacre with a press conference where it promises to “offer <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/18/politics/nra-silence-regrouping/index.html">meaningful contributions</a> to make sure this never happens again.”</p><p>And on Sunday, NRA head Wayne LaPierre will appear on "Meet the Press" to continue the gun lobby’s damage control efforts after a shooting that has galvanized political leaders to push for stronger gun laws. “The group’s abrupt shift in communications strategy shows something unusual is happening inside the powerful group: <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/nra-shifts-to-crisis-mode-85334.html?ml=po_r">it’s feeling heat</a>,” Politico’s Anna Palmer reported today.</p><p>If history is any guide, tomorrow and on Sunday, LaPierre -- who has been at the NRA for over 20 years -- will likely sound reasonable and open-minded about guns, and perhaps announce an evolution of thinking. Maybe the killing of 20 innocent children has genuinely moved his group away from its reflexive opposition to any kind of gun restrictions. This would certainly be welcome from an organization that has dominated the gun control debate so thoroughly over the past decade that it has effectively stamped it out.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/dont_trust_the_nras_wayne_lapierre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/dont_trust_the_nras_wayne_lapierre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grover Norquist breaks his own pledge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/grover_norquist_breaks_his_own_pledge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/grover_norquist_breaks_his_own_pledge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grover Norquist has come out in support of Boehner's "Plan B" after pledging to oppose any and all tax hikes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grover Norquist’s tax pledge is pretty straightforward. “I [undersigned] pledge to ... oppose any and all efforts to <a href="http://www.atr.org/userfiles/Senate%20Pledge(2).pdf">increase the marginal income tax rates</a>,” it reads. So, it was a little surprising to see this afternoon that Norquist has come out in favor of an increase in marginal income tax rates. <a href="http://www.atr.org/atr-statement-plan-b-tax-a7388">An official declaration</a> from his Americans for Tax Reform ruled as kosher John Boehner’s so-called Plan B fiscal cliff proposal:</p><blockquote><p>The House this week will vote on a tax bill.  This legislation—popularly known as “Plan B”--permanently prevents a tax increase on families making less than $1 million per year. ... Having finally seen actual legislation in writing, ATR is now able to make its determination about a legislative proposal related to the fiscal cliff.<strong> ATR will not consider a vote for this measure a violation of the Taxpayer Protection Pledge</strong>.</p></blockquote><p>You know what else Plan B would do? Hike taxes on Americans making <em>more</em> than $1 million a year, in direct contravention of Norquist's pledge.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/grover_norquist_breaks_his_own_pledge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/grover_norquist_breaks_his_own_pledge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Boehner&#8217;s 1 minute press conference</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/john_boehners_1_minute_press_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/john_boehners_1_minute_press_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boehner rejects Obama's offer in a press conference that was over almost before it began]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thirty-six hours ago, Washington was abuzz with talk that <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/12/17/a-fiscal-cliff-deal-is-near-here-are-the-details/">a deal was nigh</a> to avert the fiscal cliff, prompting <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/business/wall-street-rallies-fiscal-cliff-optimism-1C7660226">a stock market rally</a> in New York and some celebration elsewhere. Obama had made major concessions on taxes and entitlements, enraging his base but perhaps moving toward a deal, and Republicans, at least for a moment, seemed willing to play ball.</p><p>So much for all that. Speaker John Boehner yesterday decided to move ahead with his "Plan B," which the White House threatened to veto today. Boehner responded with a press conference this afternoon that lasted less than one minute and suggested talks have broken down between the parties.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/john_boehners_1_minute_press_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/john_boehners_1_minute_press_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The progressive case for the chained CPI</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/the_progressive_case_for_the_chained_cpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/the_progressive_case_for_the_chained_cpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since we may have to swallow them, here's the best argument possible for switching to a "chained CPI"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals are going to have to decide if they’ll stick with the president if the plan he floated this week to cut Social Security benefits by switching to the so-called chained CPI becomes a reality, and it’s not an easy choice. Progressive pressure groups and lawmakers are furious with Obama for proposing the cuts, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/liberals_reject_obamas_social_security_offer/">as I noted yesterday</a>, but House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi said <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/18/nancy-pelosi-fiscal-cliff_n_2324042.html">she’s confident</a> that her caucus would ultimately support the plan if the president asks them too.</p><p>The case against moving to the chained CPI is easy to make: It represents a real cut to seniors’ Social Security benefits, which has so far been a non-starter. Even advocates of the switch acknowledge this. But since we may have to swallow it, it’s worth laying out the best progressive argument possible in favor of the chained CPI. We're not saying it's right, but it's a case that should be made.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/the_progressive_case_for_the_chained_cpi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/the_progressive_case_for_the_chained_cpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals reject Obama&#8217;s Social Security offer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/liberals_reject_obamas_social_security_offer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/liberals_reject_obamas_social_security_offer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prominent progressives fear the president has crippled Social Security in a "grand bargain" with House Republicans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama and House Republicans appear to be closing in on a deal to avert the fiscal cliff, but liberals are not happy with it.</p><p>Late last night, the White House offered a plan with two major concessions to Republicans. First, it would hike taxes on the wealthy, but only on income above $400,000, instead of the current $250,000 threshold. Second, and far more controversially, Obama offered to change the formula used to calculate Social Security benefits in a way that would cut outlays to seniors slightly while saving the program $225 billion over a decade.</p><p>The reaction from liberals, who have been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/progressives_get_ready_to_push_obama/">demanding all along that social safety net programs be off the table</a>, was swift and fierce. "This is a cut affecting every single beneficiary -- widows, orphans, people with disabilities and many others.  It is a cut which hurts the most those who are most vulnerable: the oldest of the old, those disabled at the youngest ages, and the poorest of the poor. Perhaps fittingly, this will be done during the holiday season, when the American people are distracted," Nancy Altman, the founding co-director of the advocacy group Social Security Works, said in a statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/liberals_reject_obamas_social_security_offer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/liberals_reject_obamas_social_security_offer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The answer is not more guns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/the_answer_is_not_more_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/the_answer_is_not_more_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A trendy argument suggests we'll be safer if more people carry guns. It's dangerous, wrong and terrible policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, the response isn’t even surprising. After a horrific massacre like the one in Newtown, Conn., last week, gun-rights advocates will argue that someone with a gun at the scene could have stopped the killer. They conclude that the answer to mass shootings is to arm more people.</p><p>This argument is usually made by people who can be easily dismissed, like boffo U.S. Rep. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/16/louie-gohmert-guns_n_2311379.html">Louie Gohmert, R-Texas,</a> or Larry Pratt, the executive director of Gun Owners of America. Pratt said this weekend that “gun control supporters <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/15/gun_owners_of_america_gun_control_advocates_have_the_blood_of_little_children_on_their_hands/">have the blood of little children on their hands</a>” for preventing law-abiding citizens from bringing guns into schools.</p><p>But the more guns/less crime argument shouldn’t be dismissed so summarily. There’s an undeniable intuitive logic to it -- if you were facing down an active shooter, wouldn’t you want to be armed? Nearly half of Americans keep a gun in their home -- and the majority say the main reason they do so is to defend themselves. Across the country, states are expanding right to carry  laws, which allow permitted citizens to carry concealed weapons for their own defense.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/the_answer_is_not_more_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/the_answer_is_not_more_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Assault rifle company issues &#8220;man cards&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/bushmasters_horrible_ad_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/bushmasters_horrible_ad_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assault weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The maker of the assault weapon that killed 27 people in Connecticut quizzes its customers on their manhood]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of reasons to own guns: Hunting, self-defense, clinging purposes, but also to bolster your deflated sense of masculinity. This is not some glib liberal notion about how men only buy guns to compensate for their inadequacies, this is the explicit aim of an ad campaign from Bushmaster, the maker of the assault rifle that was used to kill 27 people last week in Connecticut.</p><p>You see, you’re not officially a man until Bushmaster tells you you are. “To become a card-carrying man, visitors of bushmaster.com will have to prove they’re a man by answering <a href="http://www.bushmaster.com/press-release-050710.asp">a series of manhood questions</a>. Upon successful completion, they will be issued a temporary Man Card to proudly display to friends and family,” a press release for the campaign reads.</p><p>Most of the quiz questions are pretty predictable and harmless, if dumb -- Do you eat tofu? Can you change a tire? Have you ever watched figured skating “on purpose”? -- but others are more challenging. One question gives you four possible options of how to respond if a car full of the rival team’s fans cuts you off on the way to the championship game. <a href="http://twitpic.com/bmuyjn">The correct answer</a>, it turns out, is to commit arson: “Skip the game, find the other car in the parking lot, and render it unrecognizable with a conflagration of shoe polish and empty food containers.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/bushmasters_horrible_ad_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/bushmasters_horrible_ad_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The NRA is the enabler of mass murderers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/the_nra_is_the_enabler_of_mass_murderers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/the_nra_is_the_enabler_of_mass_murderers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of today's shootings, Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler says we need to wage "war" on the gun lobby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York Democratic Rep. Jerrold Nadler called for a "war" on the National Rifle Association in light of the mass shooting in Connecticut today in an interview with Salon, saying the gun lobby group is the “enabler of mass murderers.”</p><p>Nadler, a rare fierce advocate of gun control on Capitol Hill, said the shooting should be a wake-up call to our “crazy attitude to guns” and the power of the gun lobby. He noted that other modern industrialized countries like the U.K., Sweden and Germany witness <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/jul/22/gun-homicides-ownership-world-list#data">fewer than 50</a> gun homicides every year, compared to the roughly 10,000 people killed here. The difference, he said, is that they have “rational gun control regimes,” while we can barely even discuss gun control thanks to the power of the gun lobby.</p><p>“Al-Qaida killed 3,000 people in the World Trade Center in 2001. The United States went to war because of that. Because of the NRA, we’ve lost 10,000 people last year unnecessarily. It’s time we went to war,” he said. “And you have to say the National Rifle Association is the enabler of mass murderers. And we’ve got to stomp on them instead of kowtowing to them.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/the_nra_is_the_enabler_of_mass_murderers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/the_nra_is_the_enabler_of_mass_murderers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>184</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>