<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Alex Seitz-Wald</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/alex_seitz_wald/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 02:55:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the pro-austerity hypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowles-Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpson-Bowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fix the Debt coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austerity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wealthy corporate titans behind Fix the Debt are using a loophole to avoid paying taxes, a new report charges]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major corporations backing a group founded by the pro-austerity icons Simpson and Bowles take advantage of a loophole to avoid paying taxes on some of what they pay their CEOs, according to a new report.</p><p><a href="http://www.ips-dc.org/files/6030/ftd%20exec%20pay%20tax%20loophole.pdf">The report</a>, from the liberal Institute for Policy Studies, finds that between 2009 and 2011, top executives at the 90 publicly held corporate members of the Fix the Debt coalition raked in at least $953 million -- and as much as $1.6 billion -- through the “performance pay” loophole, which counts some executive compensation as a tax-deductible business expense, instead of a salary. Fix the Debt, founded by Alan  Simpson and Erskine Bowles, is one of the many groups tied to Wall Streeter cum policy entrepreneur <a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Portal:Fix_the_Debt">Pete Peterson</a>, who has spent the last 20 years trying to reduce the debt, in large part through cuts to programs like Social Security and Medicare. The group has attracted some of the largest corporations in the country as sponsors, as well as former lawmakers, giving it serious clout in Washington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/how_pro_austerity_executives_use_loopholes_to_break_the_debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;This could be a career ender for Michele Bachmann&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/this_could_be_a_career_ender_for_michele_bachmann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/this_could_be_a_career_ender_for_michele_bachmann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Ethics Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ethics questions swirling around the Tea Party lawmaker are a "big problem," experts say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a special investigator soon to be <a href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/205705121.html">appointed</a> by the chief justice of the Iowa Supreme Court, the ethics cloud hovering over Rep. Michele Bachmann could quickly become a major problem for the Tea Party hero, experts tell Salon.</p><p>“This is very serious," said Craig Holman, a government ethics lobbyist at liberal-leaning watchdog group Public Citizen. "It’s not Watergate, or at least not yet, but these are a series of allegations that are each serious on their own, and when you put them all together, this could be a career ender for Michele Bachmann."</p><p>Ken Boehm, chairman of the conservative-leaning National Legal and Policy Center, told Salon that we should wait to see what investigators find -- indeed, no wrongdoing has been reported so far -- though he acknowledged the escalating scrutiny could be a major headache for the congresswoman down the line.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/this_could_be_a_career_ender_for_michele_bachmann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/this_could_be_a_career_ender_for_michele_bachmann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alex Jones: Conspiracy Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conspiracy theories can be big business. Here's how the multi-platform entrepreneur makes his millions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">It’s good to be Alex Jones. Matt Drudge, the conservative Web entrepreneur and news aggregator, proved prophetic when he predicted that 2013 would be “<a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/23/matt-drudge-promises-year-of-alex-jones/193748">the year of Alex Jones</a>.” The longtime conspiracy broadcaster is finally breaking into the mainstream consciousness after a buzzy interview with Piers Morgan and his Boston bombing conspiracy, and traffic to his websites has <a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/infowars.com">never been higher</a>. The conspiracy business is booming.</p><p dir="ltr">And make no mistake, it is a business. That’s not to say that Jones isn’t a believer -- there are easier ways to make money -- but Jones has built a multi-platform new media empire in his Austin, Texas, Free Speech Systems LLC that reaches millions of believers and <a href="http://static.infowars.com/ads/mediakit_public.pdf">promises</a> advertisers that it will “direct lucrative buyers to you from our daily audience of active enthusiasts.” And all told, Jones is very likely raking in millions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/alex_jones_conspiracy_inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What you need to know about Gabriel Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Gomez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new GOP nominee in the race to replace John Kerry looks strong, but has plenty of problems]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a secret cabal of scientists designed the perfect politician for today's GOP from the DNA up, it might look something like Gabriel Gomez, who won a GOP primary last night to face off against Democrat Ed Markey in a special election to fill the Massachusetts Senate seat vacated by Secretary of State John Kerry.</p><p>The bilingual first-generation former Navy SEAL is a Harvard Business School graduate with a successful business career, some moderate political stances, and a penchant for running marathons. He crossed the finish line at the Boston Marathon <a href="http://www.abc17news.com/news/elections/boston-bombings-overshadow-mass-senate-election/-/18518118/19949220/-/10x7dib/-/index.html">just a few minutes before</a> the bombs went off last month. While stationed in South America in the early 1990s he met his furutre-wife, who was working in the Peace Corps at a school for students with special needs. “<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/04/21/from-middle-class-beginnings-gomez-forged-unconventional-path/XQk3alB9AeKc7tg3yUB1SM/story.html">I’m exactly what the American dream is all about</a>,” Gomez said in an April GOP debate against two other Republican challengers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/what_you_need_to_know_about_gabriel_gomez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Allen&#8217;s bizarre attack on Conan O&#8217;Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media critic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politico's star reporter takes umbrage over O'Brien's joke about a Washington hotel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not insult the Washington Hilton in the presence of Mike Allen, or Politico's star reporter will launch a multi-day crusade against you in his widely read morning tip sheet.</p><p>Conan O'Brien made this mistake while emceeing the White House Correspondents Dinner. "You know, I was worried with the sequester that we would be forced to hold this event at less prestigious hotel than the D.C. Hilton -- then I was told that's not possible," O'Brien <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/28/conan-obriens-white-house-correspondents-dinner-speech-full_n_3174365.html">said</a> in a riff mocking the aging mid-century modern hotel in Washington's Dupont Circle.</p><p>Allen was not pleased. The scribe whose odd obsession with "influence" and Washington power inspired a legendary Mark Leibovich <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/magazine/25allen-t.html?pagewanted=all">profile</a> cried in <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/0413/playbook10548.html?ml=ae_l">Playbook Monday</a>, "Conan O’Brien hurt his buzz" by making "four baseless, elitist cracks about the Hilton, acting as if it were a Motel 5." Allen returned to the subject in <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/#.UX_ufk1zLPE.twitter">today's Playbook</a>, adding that on top of Conan's "bizarre, elitist attack on his hosts at the Washington Hilton," the comedian also eschewed the free room provided by the hotel to instead stay at the Four Seasons.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to debunk George W. Bush&#8217;s attempts at revisionism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush revisionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your definitive guide to the Bush cronies' talking points, and why all of them are insane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every dog goes to heaven and every former president should get a shot at repairing his legacy, especially when it's as tattered as George W. Bush's. With the opening of his presidential library and museum this week, observers from former Bush officials to mainstream outlets were taking a fresh, rosy look at the Bush legacy. Some offered dopey and facially ridiculous cheerleading, while others offered more compelling suggestions to return to the Bush era with an open mind. After all, other presidents left office in a cloud only to be redeemed by history years later.</p><p>So, is this week making you feel a bit nostalgic for the Bush era? Don't. It's been almost half a decade since the 43rd president left office, and he's looking as bad as ever. Of course, that won't stop a small circle of admirers (many of whom used to be on his payroll) from trying, so here's your guide to taking on the five biggest specious pro-Bush talking points put forward this week:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>248</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glenn Beck is back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/glenn_beck_is_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/glenn_beck_is_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a long exile, the former Fox News host is staging a conspiracy-fueled comeback]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I've missed you so much," Jon Stewart whispered longingly at an image of Glenn Beck on Wednesday night's "Daily Show," before kissing his fingers and then pressing them against the virtual cheeks of Beck's floating head in the video box over his right shoulder.</p><p>You thought the conservative broadcaster had been banished to the Siberia that is the Internet since he left Fox News in June of 2011, but thanks to some signature conspiracy theorizing in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, Beck is back, baby. Just look at this Google Trends chart for searches of his name beginning the month after he left Fox:</p><p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/Screen-Shot-2013-04-25-at-9.01.29-PM.png"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/Screen-Shot-2013-04-25-at-9.01.29-PM.png" title="Glenn Beck Google Trends 7/11-4/13" class="size-full wp-image-13282788 aligncenter" height="201" width="533" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/glenn_beck_is_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/glenn_beck_is_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Congress finally outlaw anti-gay workplace discrimination?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/will_congress_finally_stop_anti_gay_workplace_discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/will_congress_finally_stop_anti_gay_workplace_discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Merkley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sponsor Sen. Jeff Merkley explains why this might be the year for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, a group of lawmakers is trying to succeed where Congress has failed for almost two decades, by <a href="http://www.merkley.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=065CE7B6-D02A-4369-8656-15F5899DC333">introducing a bill</a> to finally end workplace discrimination against gay and transgender Americans. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) has been a top-ticket item for advocates since it was first introduced in 1994, but principle sponsor Sen. Jeff Merkley told Salon in an interview this afternoon that he thinks this will be the year they succeed.</p><p>"I think most Americans would be surprised to find out that it is legal to discriminate against the GLBT community, and to do so in employment, which is fundamental to the opportunity for the pursuit of happiness and for equality under the law and general fairness," the Oregon Democrat said in an interview.</p><p>Indeed, though it's almost hard to believe, with no federal statute on the books, it's <a href="http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/congress-has-historic-opportunity-to-take-action-on-employment-discriminati">perfectly legal to fire someone</a> for being gay in 29 states that don't have their own non-discrimination laws. In 34 states, you can fire transgender people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/will_congress_finally_stop_anti_gay_workplace_discrimination/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/will_congress_finally_stop_anti_gay_workplace_discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamerlan Tsarnaev: Conspiracy theorist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/tamerlan_tsarnaev_conspiracy_theorist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/tamerlan_tsarnaev_conspiracy_theorist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists aren't unique to the U.S. They're also part of the Muslim world, including the alleged bomber]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've spent some time looking at the conspiracy theories that arose <em>after</em> the Boston Marathon bombing, but it's worth looking at the conspiracy theorist that allegedly started this all: Tamerlan Tsarnaev. The elder and more radical of the two brothers suspected of perpetrating the attack "believed in basically every conspiracy theory," as Dave Weigel <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/04/23/tamerlan_tsarnaev_believed_in_basically_every_conspiracy_theory.html">put it</a>, linking to <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bomb-suspect-influenced-mysterious-radical">an AP report</a> showing that Tsarnaev was interested in everything from Alex Jones to "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion," a seminal anti-Semitic conspiracy tome.</p><p>It's not particularly surprising that Tsarnaev would be drawn to a wide range of conspiracy theories, as research <a href="http://www.academia.edu/1207098/Dead_and_alive_Beliefs_in_contradictory_conspiracy_theories">shows</a> that people prone to believing one conspiracy theory will likely believe many -- even if they're completely contradictory. And he fits <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/why_people_believe_in_conspiracy_theories/">a profile</a> of a type of person likely to be drawn to conspiratorial thinking, considering he was allegedly alienated from and disgruntled with society.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/tamerlan_tsarnaev_conspiracy_theorist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/tamerlan_tsarnaev_conspiracy_theorist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The changing facts in the Boston investigation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Important details like the suspects' weapons, NYC plans and the shootout keep changing. It's fueling conspiracies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the aftermath of massive, complicated crimes it's not uncommon for a bit of crucial information to be immediately put forward by police, only to be contradicted later on. While it's understandable that initial leads and assertions might end up being wrong in a dynamic situation like the aftermath of the Boston Marathon bombing, wholesale contradictions can encourage skepticism of the motives of those releasing inaccuracies -- as with initial, false reports that Osama bin Laden <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/05/administration_backs_off_tale_of_osama_bin_laden_using_wife_as_human_shield.php">hid behind his wife</a> when U.S. forces shot him. Another effect of changing details can be to encourage conspiracy theorists who latch onto inconsistencies, and to undermine trust in authorities.</p><p>Now, almost a week after the Tsarnaev brothers fought a rolling street battle with dozens of heavily armed police officers, we learned Wednesday night that they had only a single handgun, according to sources who spoke with <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/single-gun-recovered-accused-boston-bombers/story?id=19028841#.UXlD9itATag">ABC News</a> and the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/officials_bombing_suspects_had_one_gun_during_shootout_with_police_ap/">AP</a>, something that directly contradicts what officials had previously said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/the_changing_facts_in_the_boston_investigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why people believe in conspiracy theories</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/why_people_believe_in_conspiracy_theories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/why_people_believe_in_conspiracy_theories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An expert explains the psychology of conspiratorial thinking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We've written before about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/newtown_truthers_where_conspiracy_theories_come_from/">historical and social aspects of conspiracy theories</a>, but wanted to learn more about the psychology of people who believe, for instance, that the Boston Marathon bombing was a government "false flag" operation. Psychological forces like <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/05/what-is-motivated-reasoning-how-does-it-work-dan-kahan-answers/">motivated reasoning</a> have long been associated with conspiracy thinking, but scientists are learning more every year. For instance, a British study published last year found that people who believe one conspiracy theory are prone to believe many, <a href="http://www.academia.edu/1207098/Dead_and_alive_Beliefs_in_contradictory_conspiracy_theories">even ones that are completely contradictory</a>.</p><p>Professor Stephan Lewandowsky, a cognitive scientist at the University of Western Australia, published a paper late last month in the journal Psychological Science that has received <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/04/conspiracy-theory-climate-change-science-psychology.html">widespread praise</a> for looking at the thinking behind conspiracy theories about science and climate change. We asked him to explain the psychology of conspiracy theories. This conversation has been edited for brevity and clarity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/why_people_believe_in_conspiracy_theories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/why_people_believe_in_conspiracy_theories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>191</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N.H. lawmaker endorses &#8220;false flag&#8221; conspiracy theory</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/nh_lawmaker_endorses_false_flag_conspiracy_theory/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/nh_lawmaker_endorses_false_flag_conspiracy_theory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican state representative urges readers to visit Alex Jones' website]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Hampshire Republican state Rep. Stella Tremblay posted a video from conspiracy theorist Alex Jones on Glenn Beck's Facebook page Friday laying out Jones' theory that the Boston Marathon bombing was executed by the government. "The Boston Marathon was a Black Ops 'terrorist' attack. One suspect killed, the other one will be too before they even have a chance to speak," she wrote. "Infowars broke the story and they knew they had been 'found out.'"</p><p>“There's just too many things going on that, to me, doesn't make any sense,” Tremblay <a href="http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130423/GJNEWS_01/130429720">told</a> the local Fosters' Daily Democrat, explaining other parts of a theory that is all too familiar a little over a week after the bombings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/nh_lawmaker_endorses_false_flag_conspiracy_theory/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/nh_lawmaker_endorses_false_flag_conspiracy_theory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamerlan Tsarnaev was an Alex Jones fan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tamerlan_tsarnaev_was_an_alex_jones_fan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tamerlan_tsarnaev_was_an_alex_jones_fan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The elder brother and alleged mastermind of the Boston bombings read Infowars, according to a relative]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a bizarre twist befitting a Hollywood conspiracy theory movie, <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/bomb-suspect-influenced-mysterious-radical">the AP reports</a> today that Boston Marathon bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev was influenced by conspiracy theories, including Alex Jones' website Infowars, which has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/alex_jones_is_phoning_it_in/">pushing a narrative</a> that the Tsarnaev brothers were patsies set up by a government cabal to take the fall for the bombing.</p><p>Tamerlan "took an interest in Infowars," according to Elmirza Khozhugov, the ex-husband of Tamerlan's sister. He was also apparently interested in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and was trying to find a copy of "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion," one of the most notorious conspiracy tomes of history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tamerlan_tsarnaev_was_an_alex_jones_fan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/tamerlan_tsarnaev_was_an_alex_jones_fan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox &#8220;liberal:&#8221; No more Muslim or Chinese immigrants for a while</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/fox_liberal_no_more_muslim_or_chinese_immigrants_for_a_little_while/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/fox_liberal_no_more_muslim_or_chinese_immigrants_for_a_little_while/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Beckel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob Beckel says some Muslims should be sent home or to jail, while Chinese students will hack us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/worst_reactions_during_the_boston_manhunt/">pantheon of dumb responses</a> to the Boston Marathon bombing, this just might take the cake. Bob Beckel, the token liberal and politically incorrect comic relief on Fox News' "The Five" roundtable show, said today that we should stop allowing Muslim students to come to the United States for a little while, at least until we can deal with all the ones who are here now:</p><blockquote><p>“I think we really have to consider, given the fact so many people hate us, that we're going to have to cut off Muslim students coming to this country for some period of time so that we can absorb what we've got and look at what we've got and decide whether some of the people here should be going, <strong>be sent home or sent to prison</strong>."</p></blockquote><p>Later, Beckel took a moment to clarify and backpedal a bit "before I get complaints." Instead, he added Chinese students to the list of personas non grata, because, he said, they will just end up hacking us:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/fox_liberal_no_more_muslim_or_chinese_immigrants_for_a_little_while/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/fox_liberal_no_more_muslim_or_chinese_immigrants_for_a_little_while/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP&#8217;s new plan: Hit Dems from the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_gops_new_plan_hit_dems_from_the_left/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_gops_new_plan_hit_dems_from_the_left/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Social Security and now immigration, House GOPers are trying (and failing) to sneak up on Democrats' left flank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, while progressive groups were slamming President Obama from the left on his decision to include a cut to Social Security benefits in his budget, the man responsible for getting Republicans elected to Congress .. .<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/the_gops_opening_shot_on_obamas_social_security_cuts/">also hit Obama from the left</a>. The move was surprising, considering that the vast majority of Republicans disagreed with Rep. Greg Walden, the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, and John Boehner even said <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/club-for-growth-threatens-nrcc-chairman-greg-walden-over-chained-cpi-89955.html">said so publicly</a>.</p><p>Walden's move was understandable, though. He's in a bit of a predicament: On one hand, Republicans want to reform (i.e., cut) entitlement programs, but on the other, Walden needs to get Republicans elected to Congress and the public <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/new_poll_shows_many_hate_chained_cpi/">hates the idea</a> of cutting Social Security. What's an NRCC chairman to do? Go with the poll numbers, and forget your party, apparently.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_gops_new_plan_hit_dems_from_the_left/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_gops_new_plan_hit_dems_from_the_left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun zealots: Shooting victims should stay out of debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabrielle Giffords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Taranto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Rep. Gabby Giffords and Newtown families are props and bullies, gun rights absolutists explain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Taranto, who not only writes a column for the Wall Street Journal but also edits its opinion website, rightfully became the most hated man on Twitter yesterday afternoon for questioning whether former congresswoman Gabby Giffords could have possibly written the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/18/opinion/a-senate-in-the-gun-lobbys-grip.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=1&amp;">Op-Ed</a> she published last week shortly after a gun control bill died in the Senate, considering how injured she remains after getting shot in the head two years ago.</p><p>Here's Taranto parsing the forensics of her column-writing abilities on an NRA radio show Friday, caught by Media Matters' Timothy Johnson <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/04/22/wsj-columnist-taranto-uses-gabby-giffords-injur/193712">yesterday</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/gun_zealots_shooting_victims_should_stay_out_of_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graham: Guns, but not trials, for terror suspects</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lautenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The senator wants to strip terror suspects' right to a trial, but insists on preserving their right to buy a gun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is not pleased that the Obama administration decided to prosecute Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev in civilian court, even though it would probably be <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/04/lindsey-graham-dhozkhar-tsarnaev-enemy-combatant">illegal</a> and <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/04/22/experts-enemy-combatant-designation-would-make-no-sense-in-tsarnaev-case/">counterproductive</a> to treat the U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant.</p><p>The senator, a lawyer and reserve Air Force JAG officer himself, called for stripping Tsarnaev of his constitutional rights to due process <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/04/shorter-lindsey-graham-constitution-what-constitution/275157/">even before</a> the 19-year-old was captured Friday evening. "The accused perpetrators of these acts were not common criminals attempting to profit from a criminal enterprise," Graham said on Twitter on Friday. "Under the Law of War we can hold #Boston suspect as a potential enemy combatant not entitled to Miranda warnings or appointment of counsel."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/graham_guns_but_not_trails_for_terror_suspects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former aide: Bachmann approved illegal payments</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/former_aide_bachmann_approved_illegal_payments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/former_aide_bachmann_approved_illegal_payments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an affidavit filed today, the congresswoman's former top aide points the finger at his old boss]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Michele Bachmann <a href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/blogs/204118041.html">approved</a> improper payments to the Iowa state senator who chaired her presidential campaign in the state, her former chief of staff says in an affidavit submitted today. But Bachmann didn't realize the payments to state Sen. Kent Sorenson were barred by Iowa Senate ethic rules, the former aide, Andy Parrish, said, because Sorenson had misled them.</p><p>“Congresswoman Bachmann knew of and approved this arrangement,” Parrish said in his <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/137359832/Andy-Parrish-Affidavit">affidavit</a>. “She, like the rest of us, understood from Senator Sorenson that it did not run afoul of any Iowa Senate ethics rules. We relied on his representations in this regard.”</p><p>Ironically, when Sorenson switched his allegiance to Rep. Ron Paul, Bachmann accused Paul of improperly paying the senator. As it turns out, Paul did not pay him, but Bachmann did. Sorenson has strongly denied any wrongdoing, as has Bachmann, through her lawyer.</p><p>Bachmann has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/bachmanns_ex_chief_of_staff_breaks_silence_in_ethics_probe/">faced</a> mounting ethics issues in <a href="www.salon.com/.../bachmann_faces_fresh_ethics_questions/">the past week</a>, though none appear fatal at the moment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/former_aide_bachmann_approved_illegal_payments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/former_aide_bachmann_approved_illegal_payments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Tsarnaevs might affect the gun control debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did they get their guns from the black market, online, a gun show, or a private sale in a neighboring state?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What began with two homemade bombs planted at the Boston Marathon ended after an extended shootout, when bombing suspects Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev used <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/20/us/boston-details/index.html">handguns and a rifle</a> to fight a running battle with police across several Massachusetts towns, leaving one officer dead and another severely wounded.</p><p>But police in the state tell <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2013/04/21/us/21reuters-usa-explosions-boston-guns.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">Reuters</a> and <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/mass-police-bomb-suspects-didnt-have-gun-permit">the AP</a> that neither brother had the permits required to carry a firearm in Massachusetts, which has some of the strictest gun laws in the country.</p><p>This isn't particularly surprising, since both brothers may have had trouble buying a gun from a federally licensed firearms dealer. Younger brother Dzhokhar is 19, but federal law prohibits dealers from selling handguns to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/18_year_olds_can_buy_handguns/">someone under the age of 21</a>. Older brother Tamerlan was arrested for domestic violence in 2009 and if he was convicted (reports conflict at the moment), he would be prohibited from purchasing any kind of firearm from a dealer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/where_did_the_tsarnaev_brothers_get_their_guns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How will the Boston shutdown affect workers?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First responders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working class]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13277016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Labor leaders worry hourly workers will lose wages or vacation time for not making it to work during the shutdown ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Boston became a ghost town Friday, most of the city's residents stayed home from work and got a unexpected day off. Most, but not all. While Starbucks and Subways shuttered, select Dunkin’ Donuts stayed open at the requests of law enforcement, earning deserved <a href="https://twitter.com/MichelleFields/status/325381755647430656">praise</a> for the Boston-based chain. But while the chain was "encouraging our guests to stay home today," somebody had to come in to make the Dunkaccinos for the police officers, namely the low-wage workers who staff the stores.</p><p>And while they may have been happy to do come in despite the potential danger, eager to play whatever small part they could in the manhunt for someone who terrorized Boston, labor leaders say the case highlights how the bombing and its aftermath has affected workers in the Boston area this week.</p><p>"Most low wage workers can't afford to lose a day's pay, and there's no doubt this lockdown will adversely impact the city's working poor," said Jessica Kutch, a labor activist who co-founded the organizing site <a href="http://www.coworker.org/about_us">coworker.org</a>, in an email to Salon. "I'd really like to see employers state on the record that their hourly workers will be paid for the time they were scheduled to work today -- but I suspect that most employers will place the burden of this shutdown squarely on the backs of people who can least afford it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/how_the_boston_shutdown_quietly_affected_the_working_poor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>