<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andrew Leonard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andrew_leonard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Snapchat brings the goofy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/snapchat_brings_the_goofy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/snapchat_brings_the_goofy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snapchat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiana Miller-Leonard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The point of sharing self-destructing pics is that sometimes you don't want memories to last forever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait -- what? The video-and-pic sharing app Snapchat is suddenly, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5cc9f2ac-53f3-11e2-9d25-00144feab49a.html#axzz2Gq9tJn5T">according to the Financial Times,</a> "in the coveted but risky position of beginning 2013 as the most hyped app in Silicon Valley." How'd that happen?</p><p>Sneak attacks like Snapchat's -- the app was launched in September 2011, and <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/29/billion-snapchats/">exploded</a> in popularity this past fall -- are most likely to happen when the target demographic is younger than the journalistic cohort that covers new technology. Smartphone-equipped high schoolers and college kids are the big Snapchat users, so the rest of us weren't paying much attention until the app blew up.</p><p>Or maybe you're just a jaded cynic like me, and responded to seeing the name Snapchat pop up with increasing frequency on Twitter by wondering why the heck the world needed yet another piece of software to help people share digital content. Haven't we shared enough, already?</p><p>Yes, probably. But the answer to why Snapchat is worth pondering is a couple of orders of magnitude more profound than I expected. Snapchat is the anti-Panopticon, an indigenous rebellion against the know-it-all, see-it-all, never-forget-anything networked world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/snapchat_brings_the_goofy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/snapchat_brings_the_goofy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Sullivan goes indie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Dish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The political blogger explains his bold dive into the murky waters of reader-supported online journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extra! Extra! The Daily Dish is <a>going independent.</a> Andrew Sullivan, blogger extraordinaire, declared today that his venerable, high-profile, prolific blogging operation will no longer depend on the largess of corporate owners like Time, the Atlantic or the Daily Beast to operate. He's going indie, and depending on readers to pay up.</p><p>The announcement sent shock waves through Twitter. It's a risky, bold move. Very few people have figured out how to get readers to pay for content on the Web. Sullivan's model is innovative: He plans to eschew advertising altogether. Instead, we get what he has dubbed "freemium-based metering."</p><blockquote><p>Our particular version will be a meter that will be counted every time you hit a "Read on" button to expand or contract a lengthy post. You'll have a limited number of free read-ons a month, before we hit you up for $19.99. Everything else on the Dish will remain free. No link from another blog to us will ever be counted for the meter - so no blogger or writer need ever worry that a link to us will push their readers into a paywall. It won't. Ever. There is no paywall. Just a freemium-based meter. We've tried to maximize what's freely available, while monetizing those parts of the Dish where true Dishheads reside. The only tough love we're offering is the answer to the View From Your Window Contest. You'll have to become a member to find where the place is. Ha!</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/andrew_sullivan_goes_indie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year everything went mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/the_year_everything_went_mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/the_year_everything_went_mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphones and tablets stomped all over the old-school personal computer in 2012. Society won't ever be the same]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Packing for Christmas vacation, I contemplated my laptop, a MacBook Pro that weighs down my briefcase like a lead brick. Why bother? I wasn’t planning to work over the holidays, and my iPhone could easily handle all my routine Internet needs. It just didn't make sense to lug the old thing around. As the truth sank in, I felt liberated. For the first time this century, I would leave my laptop behind.</p><p>A simple story, maybe, but in that personal shift you can hear the echo of 2012's biggest technological transformation. Call it the year of the great untethering: In 2012 "mobile" triumphed. We've seen this paradigm shift rolling down the pike for a long time. Now it's here. The decline of the PC is no longer subject to debate.</p><p>And that's a big deal. The changing sales figures for desktops and laptops versus tablets and smartphones signify more than just an interesting tech business trend. This is a story about the reconfiguration of society around the small screen, a development that has implications for the media, entertainment, and advertising industries; for our privacy and our economy; for business and politics. If you're not figuring out how to play in what the tech industry likes to call the "smart connected device space" then you have already lost. And if you are not paying attention to what these devices will do <em>to</em> us as well as <em>for</em> us, then you are criminally negligent. Society is changing fast as we get more mobile. Can we keep up?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/the_year_everything_went_mobile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/the_year_everything_went_mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrating Anonymous: The hackers&#8217; big year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/celebrating_anonymous_the_hackers_big_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/celebrating_anonymous_the_hackers_big_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sopa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[megaupload]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bad copyright laws, evil religious nuts, overzealous cops: In 2012, the hacker collective picked its enemies well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I love Anon."</p><p>The comment, written by a teenage boy at Berkeley High School a few days after the Sandy Hook shootings, came in response to a Facebook post made by my own 15-year-old son.</p><p>My son was passing along the word that <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/07/ff_anonymous/">the hacker collective Anonymous</a> had declared war against the Westboro Baptist Church, that clan of deranged religious fanatics who routinely seek to turn the misery of others into their own grandstanding opportunity.</p><p>Outraged at WBC's <a href="http://gawker.com/5969003/westboro-baptist-church-plans-to-picket-sandy-hook-elementary-school-incurs-wrath-of-anonymous">plans to protest</a> at the funeral of Sandy Hook Elementary's principal, Dawn Hochsprung, on Dec. 19, in order "to sing praise to God for the glory of his work in executing his judgment," Anonymous proceeded to expose the <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/security/privacy/anonymous-posts-westboro-church-members/240144592">personal information</a> of WBC members -- home and email addresses, phone numbers, etc. -- and started acting as a coordinating center for anti-WBC counter-protests. For teenage boys at Berkeley High, Anonymous' direct action was the epitome of cool.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/celebrating_anonymous_the_hackers_big_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/celebrating_anonymous_the_hackers_big_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who has the best smartphone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lumia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple? Nokia? Samsung? Ask a fanboy, and step back as the sparks start to fly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>"Aesthetically pleasing" is very subjective.</em></p></blockquote><p>I was deep into the fifth page of the reader comments of the first installment of Ars Technica's excellent <a href="http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2012/12/the-state-of-the-smartphone/">"The State of Smartphones in 2012,"</a> when I encountered this observation, which is simultaneously the most illuminating and worthless Internet comment of all time. It was a response to the declaration by Ars Technica's Andrew Cunningham that the "Live Tiles" user interface in the brand-spanking-new Windows Phone 8 operating system was more "aesthetically striking" than the icons of Apple's iOS or the widgets of Google's Android.</p><p>(With Live Tiles, the restless smartphone user can expand or shrink the on-screen real estate devoted to a particular app or function, providing a level of configurability alien to the straitlaced universe that iPhone lovers, in particular, are accustomed to. Remember this, for future reference: Windows: freedom! Apple: tyranny!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/who_has_the_best_smartphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is no &#8220;dangerous&#8221; Apple tax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/there_is_no_dangerous_apple_tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/there_is_no_dangerous_apple_tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Reuters columnist ridiculously compares the cost of iPhone and iPad addiction to Uncle Sam's pound of flesh]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many good reasons to criticize Apple, the world really doesn't need to invent new ones that are utterly disconnected from reality. But that didn't stop Reuters' Chris Taylor, who has a column up today decrying <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/10/us-apple-tech-tax-idUSBRE8B911120121210">"The 'Apple Tax' -- America's Dangerous Obsession."</a></p><p>Here's how it begins:</p><blockquote><p>With the "fiscal cliff" looming, taxpayers are wringing their hands about all sorts of things. Income taxes might rise, dividends might get walloped, lifetime gift-tax exemptions might get slashed.</p> <p>But when it comes to immediate impact on their wallets, maybe they should be thinking about something else entirely: The Apple tax.</p> <p>Americans are shelling out big bucks annually to outfit the entire household with Apple products.</p></blockquote><p>But about halfway down the column, Taylor notes, "Remember, this is not something that consumers are being forced to pay. They are dipping willingly into their own pockets, because they're essentially slaves to the devices."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/there_is_no_dangerous_apple_tax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/there_is_no_dangerous_apple_tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The price of airline iPad freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_price_of_airline_ipad_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_price_of_airline_ipad_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13120439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another defeat for privacy: We will soon be able to use our mobile devices during takeoff and landing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I get it. I understand why the twittering masses are so excited to learn that FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski <a href=" http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/271565-fcc-chairman-to-faa-allow-greater-use-of-electronic-devices-during-flights">sent a letter last week</a> to the FAA encouraging the agency to get its act together and allow airline passengers to play with their mobile devices during takeoff and landing. I have long wondered, along with everyone else, why we haven't seen any meaningful scientific evidence that the use of such devices interferes with the operation of an aircraft. Miles away from the airport, I still feel the pain for those parents of toddlers (and everyone sitting within earshot) who are denied the right to distract their spawn with the fabulous interactivity of the latest iPad. And I always die a little death every single time I have to stop checking for the latest Facebook status updates just so my Boeing 727 can get launched off the ground. Let Alec Baldwin <a href="http://mashable.com/2011/12/06/alec-baldwin/">play as much</a> "Words With Friends" as he wants! We're talking about <em>freedom</em> here!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_price_of_airline_ipad_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/the_price_of_airline_ipad_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new low for Nokia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/a_new_low_for_nokia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/a_new_low_for_nokia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for world domination. The one-time cellphone king is selling its own headquarters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can still remember the Nokia coat hangers. Twelve years ago, during a visit to the company's Helsinki headquarters, I marveled at their sleek and stylish design. Angled bars of steel, hanging in serried rows in the vast coat racks on the building's first floor, they were modernist, functional, beautiful. To see them was to crave them, a feeling very much in keeping with how Nokia's phones were lusted after by the whole world in the year 2000. The pride of Finland paid attention to every detail. In a country where winters were long and hard, every building I visited in Helsinki had a prominent coat rack. Nokia's was, without question, the best.</p><p>Those coat hangers of yore were brought to mind by the news this week that Nokia <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/dec/04/nokia-sell-lease-helsinki-headquarters">is trying to sell its headquarters.</a> The plan is to save cash by leasing the building back as a tenant. It's not the kind of news that bumps up the stock price. Ozymandias has got nothing on Nokia. Twelve years ago, the company utterly dominated the global market for cellphones. It was hiring employees at a rate of 1,000 a month. In an article <a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/20/chapter_six_part_1/">I wrote about Finland and open-source software that spring,</a> I described Nokia as "an aggressive, fast-growing, fully global company that makes Microsoft look like an old fuddy-duddy."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/a_new_low_for_nokia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/a_new_low_for_nokia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing the Apple jobs back home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offshoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reverse globalization is suddenly in the headlines. Here's why American workers shouldn't be jumping for joy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Cook may not be Steve Jobs, but the new Apple CEO proved this week that he is just as good as the old Apple CEO at getting the media to snap to attention. One carefully calibrated bomb dropped toward the end of a humongous Bloomberg BusinessWeek interview -- that <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-12-06/tim-cooks-freshman-year-the-apple-ceo-speaks#p9">Apple plans to spend $100 million</a> to bring some Mac manufacturing back to the United States in 2013 -- rocketed around the world, from Twitter to the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/technology/apple-to-resume-us-manufacturing.html?hp ">New York Times,</a> in less time than it takes to run down the battery on your iPhone. Who needs Steve Jobs? Real <em>jobs</em> are coming back to America!</p><p>The timing was perfect for a growing cohort of economy-watchers eager to make the argument that globalization's malign impact on the American worker has hit high tide and is finally beginning to ebb. Just a week ago, the Atlantic presciently published <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/12/the-insourcing-boom/309166/">"The Insourcing Boom,"</a> a fascinating in-depth story by Charles Fishman investigating General Electric's decision to start up new appliance assembly lines in the U.S. And "GE is not alone," writes Fishman,  arguing that an increasing number of American corporations are discovering it makes economic sense to bring the factories back home. Apple's news was the exclamation point at the end of the Atlantic's sentence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/bringing_the_apple_jobs_back_home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An online privacy invader gets caught</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Epic marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Impotent? Infertile? Bankrupt? Online advertisers want to know, and they'll break the law to find out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News from the privacy wars: The Federal Trade Commission and Epic Marketing, an online ad network, have settled <a href="http://ftc.gov/os/caselist/1123182/121205epiccmpt.pdf">charges</a> that Epic was secretly and illegally gathering information on the browsing history of Web users, a practice known as "history sniffing" or "history stealing."</p><p>And not just any kind of history. Epic was specifically looking for people who had visited websites searching for information on "fertility issues, impotence, menopause, incontinence, disability insurance, credit repair, debt relief, and personal bankruptcy." Epic divided these people up into "interest groups" and targeted advertisements to them. So if, for example, you Googled "impotence" and visited a few Web pages with relevant information, the next time you checked out CNN.com you might suddenly be assaulted by a slew of Viagra and Cialis advertisements.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/an_online_privacy_invader_gets_caught/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How consumer brainwashed are you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos quiz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The perfect marketing campaign: A free game app that tests our recognition of corporate branding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For his 15th birthday, I gave my son an iPod Touch, a piece of technology that would have seemed like the purest magic to me when I was his age. He likes it, a lot, and I like to watch him use it a lot, because paying attention to how teenagers interact with modern consumer technology is an endlessly fruitful way to learn about where the intersecting forces of capital and entertainment will push society next. But even with long experience at this voyeuristic style of technology journalism, I was a little taken aback when I saw what he was doing with his new favorite toy last Sunday.</p><p>He was playing <a href="http://aticod.com/portfolio/logosQuiz/">Logos Quiz,</a> a game that is based primarily on the ability to identify corporate logos.</p><p>I was appalled and amazed. We've all become quite used to product placement in our entertainment, to living in a world in which TV shows like, say, "Hawaii 5-0" don't even try to hide their primary function as vehicles for Victoria's Secret and Microsoft Surface marketing campaigns. But to make the ability to recognize a brand into the product itself -- that's pure genius. A 15-year-old's attention span in 2012 is perhaps the most fickle thing to ever exist on this planet -- to see my son trying to guess whether a certain squiggle signified BMW or Mercedes Benz was astonishing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/advertising_that_money_cant_buy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Facebook lesson for terrorists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/a_facebook_lesson_for_terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/a_facebook_lesson_for_terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[like button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be careful when you "like" that video of a suicide bomber in Afghanistan. The FBI is watching]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 19, 2012, 23-year-old Ralph Deleon, a legal permanent resident of the United States living in Ontario, Calif., "liked" a link to a video shared on Facebook by Sohiel Omar Kabir, a naturalized citizen of the U.S. originally from Afghanistan.</p><p>The link in question was one that might have given many Facebook users pause. According to <a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/526016-kabir-et-al-complaintsigned-2.html">an affidavit filed by N. T. Elias,</a> a special agent with the FBI, the video, titled "Dua of Sheikh Muhammad al Mohaisany masjid al haram makkah," appeared "to be a prayer for the success of the mujahideen and features various photos including Al-Qa'ida leaders Usama Bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri, 9/11 attacks, bloodied adults and children, and Islamic fighters."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/a_facebook_lesson_for_terrorists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/a_facebook_lesson_for_terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing vs. Google: Where should you shop?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/bing_vs_google_where_should_you_shop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/bing_vs_google_where_should_you_shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny sullivan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A heated battle is brewing over who provides the best results for consumers. Let's test it -- and buy some stuff!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tut, tut; this isn't what we call the Christmas spirit. Just in time for the full-throated final stretch roar of the holiday shopping season, Microsoft has launched a nasty attack on Google, <a href="http://scroogled.com/">accusing the search giant</a> of betraying its principles by including paid advertisements for retail outlets in its Google Shopping search results.</p><blockquote><p>In the beginning, Google preached, "Don't Be Evil" -- but that changed ... when Google Shopping announced a new initiative. Simply put, all of their shopping results are now paid ads ...</p> <p>... We say that when you limit choices and rank them by payment, consumers get Scroogled. For an honest search result, try Bing.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/bing_vs_google_where_should_you_shop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/bing_vs_google_where_should_you_shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The surveillance state high school</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_surveillance_state_high_school/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_surveillance_state_high_school/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid chips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john jay high school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrea hernandez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Texas student believes her school's chipped ID cards are a violation of her civil liberties. She's right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberals and conservatives alike are up in arms about the story of Andrea Hernandez, a Texas high school sophomore who is refusing to wear a student ID card embedded with an RFID (radio frequency identification) chip. And, well, they should be; there is much cause for outrage. But most people seem to be missing the real story: Our pathetic national unwillingness to properly fund our public schools is the real root of this latest manifestation of surveillance state evil.</p><p>But first, some background. Officials in San Antonio's Northside school district are claiming that the ability to locate the exact whereabouts of students via RFID chips will boost attendance and enhance safety. A number of different schools have attempted <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/09/rfid-chip-student-monitoring/">similar schemes in recent years,</a> provoking strong condemnation from groups <a href="http://www.spychips.com/school/RFIDSchoolPositionPaper.pdf ">across the political spectrum</a> who argue that forcing human beings to carry electronic tracking devices constitutes a profound invasion of privacy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_surveillance_state_high_school/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_surveillance_state_high_school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Capitalism&#8217;s grossest win: The final triumph of Black Friday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/capitalisms_grossest_win_the_final_triumph_of_black_friday/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/capitalisms_grossest_win_the_final_triumph_of_black_friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Friday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Plymouth Rock to Thanksgiving at Best Buy: The Puritan ethic went spectacularly astray, all for an iPad mini]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For wily veterans of a decade of Black Friday doorbuster sales, 2012 was the year that the last semblance of a boundary between the actual day of Thanksgiving and the formal commencement of the holiday shopping season finally collapsed. It wasn't just the decision by some of the biggest retailers to move their opening hours earlier than ever before. For many customers, the exact time when the doors were unlocked was irrelevant, because Thanksgiving had already become completely subsumed in shopping mania. What difference does it make if the doors open at 8 p.m. or midnight, if you were already in line days earlier?</p><p>Consider the example of the Kelley family in Fort Myers, Fla., so determined to sacrifice nothing of their quality of life while in quest for the perfect deal that they showed up in front of the local Best Buy's doors on <em>Monday,</em> equipped with a dinner table.</p><p>This is what we call <em>not messing around:</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/capitalisms_grossest_win_the_final_triumph_of_black_friday/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/capitalisms_grossest_win_the_final_triumph_of_black_friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Triumph of the Obama nerds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/triumph_of_the_obama_nerds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/triumph_of_the_obama_nerds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harper Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narwhal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When geeks master politics: The Atlantic's Alexis Madrigal has the story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexis Madrigal's great story about Barack Obama's campaign technology team, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/">"When the nerds go marching in,"</a> is worth checking out for the cover photo alone, a tableau positively reeking of deep geekdom. But the story itself is a must read for anyone interested in technology and the presidential race. A great deal has been written about how Obama's campaign expertly leveraged the digital era to win two elections; Madrigal's account is the current state of the art.</p><p>It feels a trifle spoiler-ish to steal from the end of Madrigal's magisterial article, but the closing stretch, a glimpse at how acutely the nerds started to feel the huge consequences of their potential success or failure, is moving.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/triumph_of_the_obama_nerds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/triumph_of_the_obama_nerds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paula Broadwell&#8217;s big mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/paula_broadwells_big_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/paula_broadwells_big_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris soghoian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She thought she was covering her tracks. But in the age of frictionless surveillance, Big Brother can't be stopped]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The funny thing is, Paula Broadwell and David Petraeus thought they knew what they were doing. They were careful, more careful than the average American fooling around outside the bounds of marriage tends to be. When Broadwell wanted to warn off the other woman she suspected of messing with her man, she set up an anonymous email account and only used it away from home, usually on the Wi-Fi networks of hotels she was staying in. Broadwell and Petraeus also thought they could avoid having their emails intercepted in transit by technically avoiding "sending" them at all. Instead, they saved their messages to each other as "drafts" in a Gmail account to which they both enjoyed access.</p><p>But if they thought they were being smart, they were wrong. Broadwell and Petraeus were undone, says ACLU privacy and technology expert <a href="http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-national-security/surveillance-and-security-lessons-petraeus-scandal">Christopher Soghoian, </a>by their "lack of knowledge of operational security" and "poor tradecraft." "Draft" messages are stored in Gmail's server cloud just like all other sent and received messages. And the FBI turned out to be more than capable of correlating the Internet Protocol addresses that identified the origin of Broadwell's supposedly "anonymous" emails with hotel records that showed Broadwell as a guest at the same time the messages were sent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/paula_broadwells_big_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/16/paula_broadwells_big_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t be the next Broadwell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/how_not_to_be_paula_broadwell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/how_not_to_be_paula_broadwell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick and dirty guide to locking down your online life -- and staying safe from government snooping]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call it Paula Broadwell blowback. If there's anything we've learned from the tawdry mess that has suddenly overwhelmed our nation's highest military and intelligence agency leaders, it's that it's far too easy for the government to pry into our email. Long-standing privacy concerns have reawakened with a vengeance. Last night, a correspondent amusingly writing Salon under the pseudonym <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_Mulder">"Fox Mulder"</a> beseeched us to publish "an in-depth story (or stories) on how citizens can regain their privacy from the National Security State." We're working on that, but in the meantime, here are some quick and dirty tips for how you can start locking down your online life.</p><p>Remember, there are always going to be trade-offs for increased security , the more you encrypt your data to make it impossible for snoops to access, the more inconvenient it will be to get at your own information yourself. So be forewarned -- you can find an astonishing plenitude of information on the Web about how to secure your information, but complete privacy is never going to be hassle-free.</p><p>1) <strong>Your smartphone</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/how_not_to_be_paula_broadwell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/how_not_to_be_paula_broadwell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup is very upset at Nate Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FiveThirtyEight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The polling firm complains operations like FiveThirtyEight could spoil polling for everyone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Gallup just blame Nate Silver for ruining the art and science of polling?</p><p>You don't have to read too far between the lines of a statement from Gallup's editor in chief, Frank Newport, <a href="http://pollingmatters.gallup.com/2012/11/polling-likely-voters-and-law-of-commons.html">published on Friday,</a> to get that impression.</p><p>Newport first attempts the formidable task of defending Gallup's polling accuracy during the 2012 campaign. Perhaps he was anticipating <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/">Silver's Saturday column,</a> which labeled Gallup the most inaccurate pollster of all the firms that measured voter sentiment this year. But Silver was hardly alone in wondering why Gallup regularly reported numbers much more favorable to Romney than anyone else in 2012. We deserve an explanation a little less lame than Newport's: what's the big fuss? Gallup wasn't really off by <em>that much.</em></p><p>But then it gets interesting:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Call of Duty: David Petraeus&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/call_of_duty_david_patraeus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/call_of_duty_david_patraeus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Navy Seals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call of Duty: Black Ops 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Call of Duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Patraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warfighter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hottest new video game includes disgraced CIA director as defense secretary. What's next for modern warfare?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone's been there. You're watching TV, and you get sucked into what appears to be a movie trailer for a new action thriller. Navy SEALs are taking out a terrorist in some war-torn third-world nation. Explosions! Gore! High-tech wizardry!</p><p>A couple of seconds later  you realize you've been hornswoggled by yet another commercial for a new first-person-shooter combat game. You were fooled because the graphics were so goddamned realistic.</p><p>But I'll bet you didn't know just how realistic modern video games strive to be. Or what a chore it is to keep up with the ever-changing military state-of-the-art.</p><p>In the latest installment in Activision's hugely successful "Call of Duty" video game series, "Black Ops 2," released on Monday at midnight, the secretary of defense is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/celebritology/post/david-petraeus-is-in-call-of-duty-black-ops-ii-the-host-trailer-debuts/2012/11/13/45832194-2d9d-11e2-89d4-040c9330702a_blog.html">a guy named David Petraeus.</a> That might have been a reasonable assumption, as recently as a week ago. But now it's ancient history. Might as well have Ulysses S. Grant running the show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/call_of_duty_david_patraeus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/call_of_duty_david_patraeus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>