<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andrew Leonard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andrew_leonard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 12:56:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8220;real journalists&#8221; hate Sean Parker&#8217;s wedding</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_real_journalists_hate_sean_parkers_wedding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_real_journalists_hate_sean_parkers_wedding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bryan Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redwood grove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexis madrigal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspicuous consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silicon Valley has launched a backlash against ankle-biting journalists. Careful what you wish for, guys]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, let's get this straight: Rich Silicon Valley techies are <em>so mad</em> at the current, ongoing backlash against rich Silicon Valley techies that they have unleashed a backlash of their own -- against tech journalists!</p><p>The line that tech journalism should never have crossed? Mocking Napster co-founder and Facebook investor Sean Parker's $4.5 million wedding in a redwood grove on the Monterey Peninsula.</p><p>If you've been following this story, you are probably familiar with Alexis Madrigal's <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/13/06/new-government-documents-show-the-sean-parker-wedding-is-the-perfect-parable-for-silicon-valley-excess/276521/">initial rant condemning the wedding,</a> based on a report by the California Coastal Commission, and the undeniable fact that Parker will shell out an additional $2.5 million from his own pocket to deal with permit violations and excise the ghost of any possible impropriety. You may also have found time to wade through Sean Parker's <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/06/27/weddings-used-to-be-sacred-and-other-lessons-about-internet-journalism/">10,000 word defense,</a> in TechCrunch, of the sacredness of weddings, his own credentials as an environmentalist, and the pitiable state of Internet journalism.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_real_journalists_hate_sean_parkers_wedding/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/why_real_journalists_hate_sean_parkers_wedding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please stop the bogus tech nostalgia eulogies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/please_stop_the_bogus_tech_nostalgia_eulogies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/please_stop_the_bogus_tech_nostalgia_eulogies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AltaVista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nostalgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's what all the silly weeping over Google Reader and AltaVista really means: We miss being young and in love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 1 is here, and Google Reader is still alive. I feel cheated. After all the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/saying-goodbye-to-google-reader-my-own-little-corner-o-602166341?utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_twitter&amp;utm_source=gizmodo_twitter&amp;utm_medium=socialflow">grief</a> and foreboding that have accompanied the last days of what so many people seem to believe was the greatest blog aggregator that shall ever stride the earth, the fact that the service still exists, at least for today, is hugely anticlimactic. I was expecting a pile of smoking ashes, or at least a 404 message. But it's all there, along with a note reminding us that "Reader will not be available after July 1." So July 2 is actually the drop-dead deadline? That's silly.</p><p>So much drama! So much scrambling for alternatives at the last minute! So much nostalgia for those days when everyone had a blog and every post was brilliant and the future seemed so bright ... Wait, did that actually happen? Maybe I'm getting carried away.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/please_stop_the_bogus_tech_nostalgia_eulogies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/please_stop_the_bogus_tech_nostalgia_eulogies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Duck Duck Go</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/app_of_the_week_duck_duck_go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/app_of_the_week_duck_duck_go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duck duck go]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The privacy-friendly search engine comes to iOS -- and brings some reading material along with it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duck Duck Go, the search engine that has sworn an oath on all that is holy and good never to track you or save any of your personal information in any way, shape or form, is capitalizing on its <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/popularity_boost_for_search_engines_outside_nsa_dragnets/">post-NSA surveillance debacle popularity.</a> This week Duck Duck Go released a "Search &amp; Stories" app for the iOS platform. (An Android Duck Duck Go app has existed since 2011.)</p><p>The new app is an odd bird. It includes the basic search functionality that we require from a search engine, but then layers a rudimentary story recommendation service on top. Just now, Duck Duck Go suggested a short news squib about a two-headed turtle named Thelma and Louise, a Wall Street Journal article warning against letting your children grow up to be tennis pros, and a story about Indiana basketball player Victor Oladipo wearing Google Glass to the NBA draft.</p><p>In an announcement of the new app, <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/PR-CO-20130627-909885.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Duck Duck Go</a> declared that the stories had "proven social value" and were generated by "by leveraging hand-selected, crowd-sourced, curated feeds." As explained by Duck Duck Go founder Gabriel Weinberg, what that basically means is that Duck Duck Go scoops up stories that reach the top of "most emailed" or "most shared" lists at sites like Reddit or the WSJ or Business Insider.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/app_of_the_week_duck_duck_go/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/app_of_the_week_duck_duck_go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mad genius of Vi Hart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_mad_genius_of_vi_hart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_mad_genius_of_vi_hart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vi Hart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twelve Tones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stravinsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schoenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You might think you don't have time for a 30-minute video on twelve-tone musical theory. You are so, so wrong ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The "mathemusician" <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/18/science/18prof.html?_r=0">Vi Hart</a> first came to my attention when my son showed me a <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=vi+hart+hexaflexagons&amp;oq=vi+hart+he&amp;aqs=chrome.1.57j0l3j62l2.3770j0&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8">hexaflexagon</a> he had made after watching one of her YouTube videos. I soon discovered that there are good reasons why Hart's YouTube channel has more than 500,000 subscribers. She's funny, geeky and has a knack for explaining complex concepts in the span of just a few minutes. The four-minute-and-thirty-seven-second long <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DK5Z709J2eo">Doodling in Math Class: Infinity Elephants"</a> provides a classic example.</p><p>But Vi Hart's ambitions do not always fit into small sizes. On Thursday, she dropped her latest effort, and there's simply no other way to describe it than as a masterpiece of mad genius. At one point during the 30-minute video she observes that she wouldn't presume to tell you what her creation is "about," but that's not going to stop me.</p><p>Here are a few things I think Vi Hart's <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4niz8TfY794">"Twelve Tones"</a> video is about:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_mad_genius_of_vi_hart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_mad_genius_of_vi_hart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The NSA&#8217;s early years: Exposed!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_nsas_early_years_exposed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_nsas_early_years_exposed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[It Wasn't All Magic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Burke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A newly declassified work of history shows how U.S. intelligence agencies helped launch the digital age]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Oct. 29, 1948, the Soviet Union suddenly changed all its ciphers and codes. What later became known as "Black Friday" delivered a huge shock to the two U.S. intelligence agencies that had conducted the bulk of American code-breaking efforts during World War II and its immediate aftermath. Before Black Friday, the Army's SIS and the Navy's OP-20-G complacently assumed that they had acquired the keys to most of the world's encrypted communications. But with a flip of the switch the U.S. was once again in the dark -- just as the Cold War was heating up.</p><p>"One of the gravest crises in the history of American cryptanalysis," writes historian Colin Burke, led directly to the 1949 mergingof the SIS and OP-20-G into the Armed Forces Security Agency. Three years later, another bureaucratic shuffle transformed the AFSA into the National Security Agency. A sense of panic induced by the "Soviets' A-Bomb, the Berlin Blockade, the forming of the satellite bloc in Eastern Europe, the fall of China, and the Korean War" -- all of which "were not predicted" by the intelligence agencies -- encouraged the U.S. government to authorize the NSA to spend tens of millions of dollars on computer research, in the hope that technological advances would help crack the new Soviet codes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_nsas_early_years_exposed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/the_nsas_early_years_exposed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social media&#8217;s wildest 24 hours</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/social_medias_wildest_24_hours/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/social_medias_wildest_24_hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Supreme Court to Austin and back again: The arc of online sound and fury bends toward justice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For 24 hours, the world of social media rocked like a roller coaster off its tracks. The outbursts of rage over the Supreme Court's decision to annul a key section of the Voting Rights Act Tuesday morning had barely subsided before environmentalists began obsessively tweeting every nuance of President Obama's climate change speech a few hours later. As afternoon became evening, Wendy Davis' filibuster in the Texas Legislature became <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/wendy_davis_feminist_super_hero/">a legend-in-the-making,</a> complete with a stunning chaotic denouement watched in real time streaming video by hundreds of thousands. The following morning, a rolling tide of ecstasy and joy swept across the Internet within seconds of the news that the Supreme Court had ruled the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.</p><p>Of course, I should be clear: This was <em>my</em> world of social media. We are filtered by whom we follow and friend. If I associated with a different motley crew, the cries of joy and rage could easily flip places. Social conservatives believe that what happened in Texas Wednesday night was a travesty of democracy and that Jesus is weeping in dismay over the prospect of a flood of gay marriage in California. And they're on Twitter too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/social_medias_wildest_24_hours/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/social_medias_wildest_24_hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the IRS &#8220;targeting&#8221; free software?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_is_the_irs_targeting_free_software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_is_the_irs_targeting_free_software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Never mind the Tea Party and Occupy; the tax man was also giving open source software a cold stare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more we learn about the so-called IRS Tea Party targeting scandal, the less there seems to be alarmed about. On Monday, Alex Seitz-Wald <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/this_pretty_much_kills_the_irs_scandal/">reported</a> that the IRS was also looking into groups with the word "Occupy" or "progressive" in their names. Liberals <em>and</em> conservatives were both getting a hard look.</p><p>As were, it turns out, <a href="http://programming.oreilly.com/2013/06/irs-wasnt-fond-of-open-source-either.html">groups that labeled themselves</a> "open source software."</p><p>Geek alert! Why would the IRS care that software programming organizations producing code free for all to share or modify as they see fit might want to seek nonprofit, tax exempt status? What part of "free" doesn't the tax man understand? Other branches of the U.S. government actually <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/netflix_facebook_and_the_nsa_theyre_all_in_it_together/">contribute</a> to open source projects.</p><p>In the <a href="http://democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/sites/democrats.waysandmeans.house.gov/files/November%202010%20BOLO%20IRS0000001349-IRS0000001364.pdf#page=13">2010 internal IRS document</a> listing keywords for examiners to watch out for, the explanation is simple. Open source isn't always what it seems:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_is_the_irs_targeting_free_software/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/why_is_the_irs_targeting_free_software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacking a car is way too easy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/hacking_a_car_is_way_too_easy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/hacking_a_car_is_way_too_easy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Hastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Clarke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Could Michael Hastings' car crash have been caused by a remote attack? Technically, yes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conspiracy theories about the cause of the car crash that killed investigative reporter Michael Hastings on June 18 started sprouting immediately after the news of his death broke. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/hastings_death_what_we_do_and_dont_know/">So far,</a>  no conclusive evidence supports foul play, but on Monday, counterterrorism expert Richard Clarke <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">made news</a> when he told the Huffington Post that the circumstances of Hastings' car chase were "consistent with a car cyber attack."</p><p>While hastening to state that he was not saying he believed the crash was a purposeful attack, Clarke did observe, reported the Huffington Post, that "'There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers' -- including the United States -- know how to remotely seize control of a car."</p><p>Clarke served during both Bush presidencies and under Bill Clinton, so presumably he wasn't speaking completely off the cuff. But just what is a "car cyber attack"?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/hacking_a_car_is_way_too_easy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/hacking_a_car_is_way_too_easy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>221</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Koch brothers want you to hack for freedom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_koch_brothers_want_you_to_hack_for_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_koch_brothers_want_you_to_hack_for_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[150 software programmers stay up all night attempting to translate the philosophy of Ayn Rand into code]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who doesn't love a hackathon? The sight of young, mostly male software programmers gathering together for intensive ad-libbed collaborative coding sessions has been an established part of Silicon Valley cultural life for at least a decade. Want to solve the world's problems? Just stay up all night!</p><p>But stick the name "Koch" on the outside of the package, and even in Silicon Valley, a region so often described as a hotbed of libertarian values, and you have yourself a controversy.</p><p>Last Thursday, BuzzFeed's Justine Sharrock <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/justinesharrock/charles-koch-stumbles-in-silicon-valley">reported</a> that intramural political warfare broke out at one Silicon Valley start-up after employees learned about plans to host a Koch-funded "Liberty Hackathon" in the company's offices.</p><p><a href="http://lincolnlabs.com/">The goal of the hackathon</a>: "promoting liberty with the use of technology ... Whether promoting individual privacy or protecting economic freedom, this event will be the first of its kind to hack on various sources of data for a chance to win $5000 in cash."</p><p>That kind of talk might play well in Texas, but in Silicon Valley, where voter registration overwhelmingly skews Democratic, just the announcement of the event proved toxic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_koch_brothers_want_you_to_hack_for_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/the_koch_brothers_want_you_to_hack_for_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you ready for Buddha 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/are_you_ready_for_buddha_2_0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/are_you_ready_for_buddha_2_0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buddhism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meditation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13335338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Facebook represents the interconnectedness of all things then Silicon Valley is already enlightened]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the Dalai Lama have a position on Facebook?</p><p>That's just one of the questions my mind wandered to after reading Noah Shachtman's terrific new Wired story on meditation, enlightenment and Silicon Valley: <a href="http://www.wired.com/business/2013/06/meditation-mindfulness-silicon-valley/">"Enlightenment Engineers:</a> Meditation and mindfulness are the new rage in Silicon Valley. And it's not just about inner peace -- it's about getting ahead."</p><p>A few selected gems:</p><ul> <li>"The technology community of Northern California wants return on its investment in meditation. 'All the woo-woo mystical stuff, that’s really retrograde,' says Kenneth Folk, an influential meditation teacher in San Francisco. 'This is about training the brain and stirring up the chemical soup inside.'”</li> <li>"Buddhists have been preaching for centuries that we are all fundamentally interconnected, that the differences between us literally do not exist. That is the basis of Buddhist compassion. And there is no place where this interconnectedness is more obviously revealed than on Facebook."</li> <li>"The source code for spiritual awakening is open to anyone."</li> <li>"Steve Jobs spent lots of time in a lotus position; he still paid slave wages to his contract laborers, berated subordinates, and parked his car in handicapped stalls."</li> </ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/are_you_ready_for_buddha_2_0/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/24/are_you_ready_for_buddha_2_0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Pause</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/app_of_the_week_pause/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/app_of_the_week_pause/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key to a fuller life -- competing with your friends to see who can use their phone the least]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I make my iPhone eat its own tail? I've been obsessed with this question ever since I learned of the existence of <a href="http://www.pause-app.com/">Pause,</a> an app that boldly encourages users to "Pause the digital. Start the real."</p><p>Never mind the philosophical quandary one confronts when grappling with the notion that just because something is "digital" it is not "real." If we are sent mean texts, do we not bleed? If that Facebook status update tickles us, do we not laugh?</p><p>More to the point, Pause is an app designed to make you use your smartphone <em>less.</em> Which leads us straight into the jaws of paradox. By using Pause, we acknowledge that we are spending too much time on our phones. But our mechanism for controlling this character flaw is another app that we must download onto our phone? Pause's purpose is to get you to spend less time on such things as Pause. This is discombobulating.</p><p>Pause is painfully simple. Load the app, pick a set amount of minutes in which you will do something "real" (like go for a bike ride, or write a blog post about an app) and then switch your phone to Airplane Mode. An alarm will ring when your time is up and you can rejoin the wireless world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/app_of_the_week_pause/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/23/app_of_the_week_pause/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now the government&#8217;s cracking down on privacy tools!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/how_to_get_the_nsas_attention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/how_to_get_the_nsas_attention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13333122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New leaked documents reveal that the mere use of encryption is a red flag for intelligence agencies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use privacy tools, go directly to jail. OK, that's not <em>exactly</em> the bombshell revealed by Thursday's installment of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/20/fisa-court-nsa-without-warrant">leaked NSA documents,</a> but the truth is close enough for serious discomfort. According to the documents, using privacy tools that encrypt your communications and hide your identity is like waving a red flag in front of the surveillance state bull.</p><p>Within minutes of the release of two new documents describing the NSA's policies on what communications data can be gathered without a warrant, privacy geeks seized <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2013/jun/20/exhibit-b-nsa-procedures-document">upon one particular passage:</a></p><blockquote><p>In the context of a cryptanalytic effort, maintenance of technical data bases requires retention of all communications that are enciphered or reasonably believed to contain secret meaning, and sufficient duration may consist of any period of time during which encrypted material is subject to, or of use in, cryptanalysis....</p></blockquote><p>In other words, as Cato fellow Julian Sanchez tweeted, if you use encryption to make your communications private, and the NSA discovers that, it can grab your data and hold on to it until it cracks the code.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/how_to_get_the_nsas_attention/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/how_to_get_the_nsas_attention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millennials save the world: Smartphones to the rescue!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Airbnb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getaround]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RelayRides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Smartphones and the sharing economy help Americans drive less -- and an oft-derided generation is leading the way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are driving less. Ever since the summer of 2005, right up until March 2013, the last month <a href="http://advisorperspectives.com/dshort/updates/DOT-Miles-Driven.php">for which statistics are available,</a> the average number of miles driven by Americans has fallen steadily. What once could easily be explained away by pointing to the double whammy of a recession and high gas prices now appears to be <a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/Did-America-Reach-Peak-Car-in-2005?utm_source=Daily&amp;utm_medium=Headline&amp;utm_campaign=GTMDaily">structural.</a> Something profound has changed in the relationship between U.S. drivers and their cars.</p><p>Look at the data, and one thing jumps out: A massive generational shift. Millennials just aren't as in love with their wheels as were their forebears. Between 2001 and 2009, the average number of miles driven by 16- to 34-year-olds dropped by 23 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/21/millennials_save_the_world_smartphones_to_the_rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bitcoin tax time?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/bitcoin_tax_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/bitcoin_tax_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bitcoin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptocurrency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual currency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13331140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A U.S. government report explores how the IRS should deal with the libertarian-beloved cryptocurrency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tthe U.S. Government Accountability Office's new report on <a href="http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/654620.pdf">the tax implications of virtual currencies</a> is definitely the GAO's most cyberpunk moment to date. The report name-checks "World of Warcraft," "Second Life" and, of course, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/a_libertarian_nightmare_bitcoin_meets_big_government/">Bitcoin.</a> Yes, that's right, the U.S. government is pondering how the IRS should deal with MMORGs (massively multiplayer online role-playing games).</p><p>Don't worry -- if you've got piles of gold accumulating in your "WoW" account, you don't need to declare it. Although, if you find a way to sell that gold to some other party in exchange for legal tender, that's a different story. That's income, and it's probably taxable.</p><p>But "WoW," and "Second Life," are sideshows. The specter of the IRS casting a shadow over Bitcoin, which the GAO concludes is "the most widely circulated virtual currency available," is the meat of the report. Just the fact that the U.S. government is starting to pay serious attention to the cryptocurrency surely has libertarians getting nervous.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/bitcoin_tax_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/bitcoin_tax_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The obsolescence of Steve Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/the_obsolescence_of_steve_jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/the_obsolescence_of_steve_jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obsolesence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A remarkable video clip from 1994 captures the Apple founder pondering silicon ephemerality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's ego, and then there's Steve Jobs. <a href="http://www.siliconvalleyhistorical.org/">The Silicon Valley Historical Association</a> has released a short clip of Steve Jobs contemplating, in 1994, the unlikelihood of his own legacy that is breathtaking in both its cogency and in its implicit revelation of Jobs' incandescent ambition. While noting that the nature of computer technology means that near-instant obsolescence is fundamental to the industry, Jobs pulls a neat reverse-Ozymandias while comparing himself unfavorably to Isaac Newton, the great Renaissance painters, and cathedral builders. (Thanks to <a href="https://twitter.com/fmanjoo/status/347376398534586369">Farhad Manjoo</a> for the tip.)</p><blockquote><p>"All the work that I have done in my life will be obsolete by the time I'm 50. Apple II is obsolete now. Apple I was obsolete many years ago. The Macintosh is on the verge of becoming obsolete in the next few years. This is not a field in which one writes a <a href="http://www.siliconvalleyhistorical.org/">Principia</a> which holds up for 200 years. This is not a field where one paints a painting that will be looked at for centuries, or builds a church that will be admired and looked at with astonishment for centuries. No, this is a field where one does one's work and in ten years it's obsolete, and really will not be usable within 10 or 20 years."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/the_obsolescence_of_steve_jobs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/19/the_obsolescence_of_steve_jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google to the NSA: Don&#8217;t be evil</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/google_to_the_nsa_dont_be_evil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/google_to_the_nsa_dont_be_evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gag orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13330085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citing the First Amendment, the search giant files a court challenge to the government's surveillance gag orders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citing the First Amendment's protection of free speech, Google  filed a legal challenge to the gag order restricting it from reporting surveillance data requests authorized by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/google-challenges-us-gag-order-citing-first-amendment/2013/06/18/96835c72-d832-11e2-a9f2-42ee3912ae0e_story.html">reported on Monday afternoon.</a></p><p>Hey, look, Google not being evil! Kind of. The news sent an electric shock through a community of privacy activists and advocates who had already spent a busy morning being exasperated by a vigorous government defense of the NSA's surveillance activities mounted during a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/house_hearing_in_celebration_of_nsa_spying/">House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing.</a></p><p>Questions of morality aside, what Google is really trying to do is protect its reputation. The <a href="http://assets.nationaljournal.com/img/MOTION.pdf">legal filing</a> asserts that on June 6, the Guardian newspaper "published a story mischaracterizing the scope and nature of Google's receipt of and compliance with foreign intelligence surveillance requests. In particular, the story falsely alleged that Google provides the U.S. government with "direct access" to its systems, allowing the government unfettered access to the records and communications of millions of user (sic)."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/google_to_the_nsa_dont_be_evil/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/google_to_the_nsa_dont_be_evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freedom from the dead battery menace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/freedom_from_the_dead_battery_menace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/freedom_from_the_dead_battery_menace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar power recharging stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second screen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AT&#038;T is bringing solar-powered recharging stations to the people. What could possibly be wrong with that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar power smartphone recharging stations are about to start popping up all over New York City, <a href="http://www.theverge.com/2013/6/18/4437762/att-goal-zero-pensa-bring-solar-charging-stations-to-nyc">reports Verge.</a></p><blockquote><p>...AT&amp;T, solar kit manufacturer Goal Zero, and Brooklyn’s Pensa Design have unveiled Street Charge, a solar-based charging unit that debuts today at Fort Green park and will be rolled out across numerous city parks and public destinations throughout the summer.</p></blockquote><p>Similar recharging stations were all the rage at SXSW Interactive this spring, which made sense, given how heavily the attendees relied on their mobile devices, and how concentrated we all were in one physical location. Whether or not busy New Yorkers -- the kind of always-on, permanently-stressed go-getters who tend to view their phones dying as a profound existential challenge -- will be willing to spare the time to hang out near a recharging station while getting juiced up remains to be seen.</p><p>What does AT&amp;T get out of this charitable enterprise, aside from a branding boost? Phones with dead batteries are phones that aren't racking up data charges, so one explanation for AT&amp;T's beneficence is the possibility that bringing free power to the smartphone masses will result in increased data consumption.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/freedom_from_the_dead_battery_menace/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/freedom_from_the_dead_battery_menace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That new supercomputer is not your friend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/that_new_supercomputer_is_not_your_friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/that_new_supercomputer_is_not_your_friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercomputers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tianhe-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China reclaims the fastest computer in the world prize. Get ready for even better surveillance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We learned this week that China has the fastest supercomputer in the world, by a long shot. The Tianhe-2 is <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/17/supercomputing-for-everyone/?hp">almost twice as speedy</a> as the previous record holder, a U.S.-made Cray Titan.</p><p>Such news, by itself, isn't particularly amazing. It's not even the first time a Chinese supercomputer has held the top ranking. The Tianhe-1 grabbed the pole position in November 2010 and held it until June 2011. Previously, Japan and the United States had <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOP500#History">traded places since 1993.</a> Supercomputing speed follows roughly the same trajectory as Moore's Law -- it doubles about every 14 months. There will always be new contenders for the throne.</p><p>But this month, there's a new context for news about the debut of ever more powerful supercomputers. Consider the first comment left on Reddit to a thread announcing <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/1g3yx1/china_builds_the_tianhe2_worlds_fastest_computer/">the exploits of Tianhe-2</a>:</p><blockquote><p>This would be a pretty awesome tool for churning through millions of phone records and digital copies of people's online data.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/that_new_supercomputer_is_not_your_friend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/that_new_supercomputer_is_not_your_friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turnkey totalitarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/turnkey_totalitarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/turnkey_totalitarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Sanchez]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When libertarians get it right: A Cato fellow explains the true danger of surveillance gone amok]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to give Cato Institute bloggers a refresher course in headline writing. Julian Sanchez's June 16 post, <a href="http://www.cato.org/blog/reply-epstein-pilon-nsas-metadata-program">"A Reply to Epstein &amp; Pilon on NSA's Metadata Program,"</a> is the most cogent analysis of what's really at stake in the government surveillance drama that I've read to date. But that headline?! To call it coma-inducing would be too polite.</p><p>Here is an alternate suggestion:</p><p>"Why the Defense of Government Surveillance by my Cato Colleagues is Misinformed, Dangerous, and Completely Misses The Point."</p><p>Sanchez also buries his most powerful analysis. The majority of his piece reads like a compelling legal brief, a point-by-point demolition of the argument that the government's ability to collect and analyze massive amounts of data about millions of Americans is properly constrained and legally justified. But then, near the end, he explains <em>why</em> this is such an important debate to have right now. Society will always struggle with the challenge of finding the proper balance between "state control and citizen autonomy," he writes. But...</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/turnkey_totalitarianism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/turnkey_totalitarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: The Sonnet Project</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/app_of_the_week_the_sonnet_project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/app_of_the_week_the_sonnet_project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shakespeare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Sonnet Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonnets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A perfect match of medium and mode: 14-line poems by the greatest writer who ever lived come to the smartphone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched one of Shakespeare's sonnets on my iPhone. Well, "watched" isn't quite right. I simmered in Shakespeare's warm embrace. I shuddered before his articulate majesty. I sat stunned, amazed at how moving the words of a writer who died four centuries ago sounded, coming out of a screen that fit in the palm of my hand. A man for all media, indeed.</p><p>And then I said, please, can I have another?</p><p>"The Sonnet Project" is an app released in May by <a href="http://www.shakespeareexchange.org/">the Shakespeare Exchange.</a> It is simple in concept, but absolutely exquisite in execution. Actors in various urban New York settings recite one of Shakespeare's 154 sonnets. Ten are already accessible via the app, about 70 are supposed to be in the can, and the plan is to release every single sonnet as an Internet video over the year leading up to Shakespeare's 450th birthday.</p><p>The cinematography is creative, the musical accompaniment is sublime and the readings scratch handfuls of pain and beauty out of your very soul. Love, lust, betrayal -- that guy Will Shakespeare, he was the real deal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/app_of_the_week_the_sonnet_project/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/app_of_the_week_the_sonnet_project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>