<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andrew Leonard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andrew_leonard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook is blowing it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg won't let me turn off the spammy online dating ads on my smartphone. It's a big mistake]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While waiting for my coffee to brew this morning, I checked my Facebook News Feed on my iPhone. But instead of amusing updates from friends and family, in the space of just a few flicks of my thumb, I was assaulted by not one, not two, but <em>three</em> different advertisements for online dating sites. Worst of all, there she was, <em>again!</em> That giant-breasted zombie stalker from Mate1.com who has been chasing me across Facebook for years!</p><p>I know she's not real. I know she's just an advertisement. But I'm still terrified of that woman. I have nightmares of getting crushed by her mammary glands, squeezed to death like a boa constrictor kills a wild pig. I don't ever want to see her again, but no matter how I try, I just can't quit her.</p><p>When first we met, in my pre-smartphone days, she flashed her soulless come-hither eyes at me from Facebook's right-hand column. I swiftly learned how to click "hide this ad" and "hide all from Mate1.com." I'm a social media take-charge kind of guy -- tweaking privacy and ad settings comes naturally to me. But then, a couple of years later, not long (and not uncoincidentally) after Facebook's IPO, she invaded my News Feed. Once again, I dutifully clicked "hide this ad" and "hide all," albeit this time with a little less faith in the honorable intentions of Facebook's ad-targeting algorithms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter vs. the New York Times: Who wins?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Thiel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megabucks libertarian Peter Thiel touts the social media network. But don't count newspapers out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A CNN headline Tuesday morning: <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/01/investing/twitter-thiel-andreessen/index.html">"Peter Thiel: Twitter will outlast the New York Times.</a>" Peter Thiel co-founded PayPal, was an early crucial investor in Facebook and is not only a very rich man, but a <a href="http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=1187">pretty smart guy.</a> Presumably, therefore, we should pay attention to what he says.</p><p>What he actually said, in a debate with Mark Andreessen at the Milken Institute Global Conference, according to CNN, was that "Twitter's roughly 1,000 employees will have jobs a decade from now," because "the business case for Twitter is solid," while employees of the New York Times "should be worried about the longevity of their jobs" because the newspaper "is not guaranteed a future in the digital age."</p><p>Please. No one is <em>guaranteed</em> a future in the digital age. But if I had to pick one paper that had the best chance of surviving and thriving, I'd probably choose the New York Times, a newspaper that continues to provide indispensable, in-depth reporting on topics of great social importance. And if I had to pick one social media network that was most likely to survive, I'd pick ... well, who the hell knows? Social media networks, so far, have the lifespan of butterflies. They look nice for a few minutes, and then they're gone. Poof! Friendster, MySpace, et cetera.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/twitter_vs_the_new_york_times_who_wins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Department of iPhone Security</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone repair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south florida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Claiming issues of "public safety" are involved, ICE agents help Apple bust South Florida smartphone repair shops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A South Florida TV news station <a href="http://www.local10.com/news/federal-agents-raid-smartphone-repair-shops/-/1717324/19898110/-/ldfpax/-/index.html">is reporting that over the last few months,</a> Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents have been raiding local smartphone repair shops and seizing counterfeit Apple parts. As many as 25 shops have been raided and "between $250,000 and $300,000 in counterfeit Apple parts" have been confiscated. In the case of at least one of the raids, the owner of a repair shop claimed that the ICE agents were accompanied by Apple representatives.</p><blockquote><p>"It's a wide investigation that is multi-state. We are looking at whole industry spectrum of repair shops that are using substandard products," said Gerard O'Neill, Assistant Special Agent in Charge of Miami Field Office for Homeland Security.</p> <p>O'Neill says it's a public safety issue and that is how Homeland Security is involved.</p> <p>He says consumers have be hurt by overheating phones that were repaired using counterfeit parts.</p> <p>"There are trademark and licensing violations as well," he added.</p></blockquote><p>According to Abel Abella, the proprietor of one of the raided repair shops, "20 ICE agents and two people from Apple came to his store."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/the_department_of_iphone_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Zuckerberg is not trying to drill in ANWR</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mark_zuckerberg_is_not_trying_to_drill_in_anwr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mark_zuckerberg_is_not_trying_to_drill_in_anwr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FWD.US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ANWR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone XL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists can relax. The Facebook founder's new PAC is not pushing a pro-fossil fuel agenda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the kind of ThinkProgress headline sure to get environmentalists riled up and retweeting furiously: <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/immigration/2013/04/26/1925921/mark-zuckerbergs-new-political-group-spending-big-on-ads-supporting-keystone-xl-and-oil-drilling/">"Mark Zuckerberg's New Political Group Spending Big On Ads Supporting Keystone XL and Oil Drilling."</a>The implication was awful, and unsettling. Cash from the billionaire and the rest of the bevy of Silicon Valley  contributing to Zuckerberg's new FWD.US PAC is bankrolling an effort to start drilling in ANWR. Sound the alarm! Better yet, change your Facebook avatar in protest!</p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/zuckerberg_oil_embed.jpg" alt="" title="zuckerberg_oil_embed" /><br /> But hang on there just a sec. The ThinkProgress headline is misleading. Zuckerberg's PAC -- or rather, the two subsidiary PACs it has launched, one leaning Democratic, and one leaning Republican -- are <em>not</em> spending big pushing drilling in Alaska and the Keystone pipeline. They are<em> spending big <em>supporting senators </em></em>up for reelection who just happen to support the Keystone pipeline and drilling in ANWR. Yes, the ads cite those positions as points in favor of those politicians, but that's not quite the same thing as a big political ad campaign pushing a specifically pro-drilling agenda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mark_zuckerberg_is_not_trying_to_drill_in_anwr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mark_zuckerberg_is_not_trying_to_drill_in_anwr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia&#8217;s shame</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/wikipedias_shame/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/wikipedias_shame/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amand Filipacchi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edit wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sexism isn't the problem at the online encyclopedia. The real corruption is the lust for revenge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Wikipedia sexist? Or is it merely an unreliable mess of angry, ax-wielding psychos engaged in agenda-driven editing? Or is it something much more complicated than that?</p><p>Last Wednesday, novelist Amanda Filipacchi <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/wikipedias-sexism-toward-female-novelists.html?_r=0">published an Op-Ed</a> in the New York Times recounting her discovery that Wikipedia editors were culling women authors from Wikipedia's list of "American Novelists" and relegating them into their own subcategory: "American Women Novelists."</p><p>"The intention appears to be to create a list of 'American Novelists' on Wikipedia that is made up almost entirely of men," she wrote, noting that there was no "American Men Novelists" subcategory. (Although, amusingly, just such a category was created shortly after the Op-Ed appeared.)</p><p>In the furor that erupted on Wikipedia in response to Filipacchi's article, it was quickly determined that the bad behavior she noticed appeared to be the work of a single misguided Wikipedia editor. One could argue that, if true, this made the Times' headline "Wikipedia's Sexism Toward Female Novelists" unfair and inaccurate. All of Wikipedia was being tarred by the unthinking stupidity of one bad editor.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/wikipedias_shame/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/wikipedias_shame/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>104</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Twitter Music</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music discovery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social media and music discovery never looked so good. But be careful who you follow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Last night I broke the seal on a Jim Beam decanter that looks like Elvis..."</p><p>I started writing my review of Twitter Music while listening to a George Jones country song I'd never heard before: "The King Is Gone (and so are you.)" I listened to a lot of George Jones on the day I learned he died. It seemed appropriate, if a bit macabre, to follow him on Twitter Music and see what sort of songs might pop up as a result.</p><p>I'm not going to list "The King Is Gone" in my top ten George Jones pantheon (frankly, any chorus with the words "yabba dabba doo" is <em>right out</em>) but I'm glad I heard it. I love being exposed to new music (even if, and sometimes especially if, it's old music).</p><p>Twitter Music is all about the social discovery of new music. It suggests for your listening pleasure songs that are already popular on Twitter, songs that the people you follow are tweeting about and listening to, and songs from artists who are in mysterious ways connected to the musicians that you choose to follow. It's confusing in a good, serendipitous, jumbled up kind of way. You're never quite sure how exactly the algorithm works that is generating the tunes, but that's OK. The whole point is <em>discovery,</em> hearing something new that you might like, generated through a fortuitous crunching of your social relationships. If you have a Spotify or Rdio premium account you can listen to the entirety of the songs; if you have iTunes you get a 30-second clip and the option to buy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/app_of_the_week_twitter_music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Homemade bombs made easier</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/homemade_bombs_made_easier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/homemade_bombs_made_easier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pressure cook bombs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samir Khan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bomb-making]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tsarnaevs learned how to make bombs from the Internet. So can anyone. And the problem will only get worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From his hospital bed, Dzhohkar Tsarnaev <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/07/01/make-bomb-kitchen-mom-featured-al-qaedas-st-english-magazine/">told investigators</a> that he and his brother learned how to make their pressure cooker bombs from "Make a bomb in the kitchen of your Mom," an article from the al-Qaida-affiliated magazine Inspire, which is easily available online. The news immediately <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xs4SjN-5To">reignited a long-simmering debate</a> about how the United States should confront the problem of access to bomb-making instructions on the Internet. Once again, society is wrestling with the thorny question of how best to balance public safety against the constitutional protection for free speech. What can we do? What should we do?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/homemade_bombs_made_easier/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/homemade_bombs_made_easier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten reasons to hate that Internet haters story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/ten_reasons_to_hate_that_internet_haters_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/ten_reasons_to_hate_that_internet_haters_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peak hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet haters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen marche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megan Fox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writer who gave us Megan Fox as an Aztec sacrifice tells us that the Internet needs more civility. Poppycock!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much do I hate <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/thousand-words-on-culture/no-saints-online-0513?src=spr_TWITTER&amp;spr_id=1456_8126030">the essay on Internet hatred</a> by Stephen Marche in the May issue of Esquire? Let me count the ways.</p><p>1) I hate that Marche makes no mention of his <a href="http://www.esquire.com/features/megan-fox-photos-interview-0213">January profile of Megan Fox,</a> a dazzlingly hyperbolic spasm of drool roundly mocked by Internet haters for, among other things, kicking off with a ludicrous Aztec sacrifice parable. ("<em>Megan Fox will not go willingly to have her heart cut out.</em>") It is annoying to get lessons in civility from someone whose current claim to fame is authorship of a terribly written profile about a not particularly interesting sex symbol that was illustrated with titillating photographs of a half-dressed actress.</p><p>2) I hate the title: "There Are No Saints Online ... but the Internet will be cleaned up yet." This is incorrect. At least one episode of Roger Moore's classic "The Saint" television series is <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ksu_MUvwicI">available on YouTube.</a> Plus, my daughter and mother are both online, and they're very nice people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/ten_reasons_to_hate_that_internet_haters_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/ten_reasons_to_hate_that_internet_haters_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why facial recognition failed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/why_facial_recognition_failed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/why_facial_recognition_failed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston bombers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facial recognition technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alessandro acquisti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13278889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The images were poor and the databases were limited, explains an expert. But all that's going to change, soon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a staple of TV dramas -- the photograph of a suspect is plugged into a law enforcement database, and a few minutes later: presto! We have a match! Facial recognition for the win!</p><p>Except the magic didn't work in the case of the Boston bombers, according to the Boston law enforcement authorities. The surveillance society did a face plant.</p><p>What happened? I called up Carnegie Mellon computer scientist Alessandro Acquisti, an expert in online privacy who has conducted <a href="http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti/face-recognition-study-FAQ/">some provocative research involving facial recognition.</a> In a series of experiments, Acqusti and his fellow researchers were able to use "off-the-shelf" facial recognition software to identify individuals by comparing photos from a dating site, or taken offline with camera phones, with photos uploaded to Facebook. The researchers were also able to figure out a startlingly large amount of personal information about the people they managed to identify. But if Acquisti could do it, why couldn't the FBI?</p><p>Acquisti explained to Salon what he thinks might be happening on Monday morning.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/why_facial_recognition_failed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/22/why_facial_recognition_failed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A nation of police scanner rebels</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police scanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law enforcement and social media were uncomfortable bedfellows in Boston this week. Teachable moment?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long after the enormity of what had happened at the finish line of the Boston Marathon began to sink in to the culture at large on Monday afternoon, someone I follow on Twitter posted a link to a live feed of Boston's police scanner. I immediately started listening. I wasn't alone. When I signed on there were 5,000 other listeners; a few minutes later, 10,000, then 20,000.</p><p>And then I turned it off. The staccato bursts of information were too chaotic, too jumbled, too contradictory for me to make much sense of. I needed more filtered news. Sure, it's way cool and still kind of mind-blowing that I can sit at my desk in Berkeley, Calif., and listen to police officers in Boston warn each other about suspicious packages that might contain explosive devices, but it wasn't helping me understand what was happening.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/20/a_nation_of_police_scanner_rebels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush aide leverages Boston explosion to boost Big Brother</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/big_brother_power_grab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/big_brother_power_grab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cispa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stewart Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative warhorse exploits the Boston bombings to argue for more government surveillance. He's wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agendas are hovering over the Boston bombings like hungry vultures desperate to rend a carcass. Exhibit A: In a post published at <a href="http://www.volokh.com/2013/04/18/fool-me-once/">the Volokh Conspiracy,</a> Stewart Baker, a senior Department of Homeland Security official in the administration of George W. Bush, argues that the Boston Marathon bombings prove that surveillance cameras are awesome and Congress should pass CISPA -- the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyber_Intelligence_Sharing_and_Protection_Act">Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act.</a></p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/al_embed.jpg" alt="" title="al_embed" /></p><p>CISPA is designed to create a structure in which private companies can seamlessly share information about their users with the government in cases involving threats to "cybersecurity." The House of Representatives passed the bill on Thursday, but the Obama administration has threatened to veto it in its current form.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/big_brother_power_grab/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/big_brother_power_grab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamerlan Tsarnaev&#8217;s Amazon wish list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/a_boston_bombers_amazon_wishlist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/a_boston_bombers_amazon_wishlist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 14:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston bombers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon wishlist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chechnya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Boston bombing suspect wanted a Chechnyan dictionary, "Snatch" and books on how to make fake IDs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/registry/registry.html?ie=UTF8&amp;type=wishlist&amp;id=1PNVMAW2D4CT1">an Amazon wish-list registry</a> registered to an email account believed to belong to Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bombing suspect was at one time very interested in making fake IDs and learning how to win friends and influence people. He was also brushing up on his Chechnyan and was hoping someone would buy him a copy of Edward Gibbon's "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire."</p><p>(Politico's Glenn Thrush <a href="https://twitter.com/GlennThrush/status/325212485416263680">found the email.</a> Conservative political blogger Justin Hart <a href="https://twitter.com/justin_hart/status/325221426959364097">found the Amazon registry.</a>)</p><p>From beginning to end, the wish list spans a period of just 18 months. The most recent entry dates back to July 8, 2007: "Voice Power: Using Your Voice to Captivate, Persuade and Communicate." There are also five different books relating to fake ID creation and document fraud -- all dated Aug. 27, 2006. And then there's "How to Win Friends and Influence People."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/a_boston_bombers_amazon_wishlist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/a_boston_bombers_amazon_wishlist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest Internet manhunt ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/biggest_internet_manhunt_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/biggest_internet_manhunt_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manhunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FBI could not have been clearer. Every eyeball counts -- and that means you too, Reddit detectives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That whole messy online vigilante debate is yesterday's news. At 5:22 p.m. ET, Thursday, FBI Special Agent Richard DesLauriers, speaking in the clearest possible language, asked the entire nation to help law enforcement identify the two suspects the FBI has pinpointed as the Boston Marathon bombers. Get your motor running, Reddit! It's time for the biggest Internet manhunt, <em>ever.</em></p><p>Historically speaking, the FBI has long asked for the public's help in catching its "Most Wanted" criminals. From posters in the post office, to John Walsh's "America's Most Wanted," law enforcement has had little problem using any available media to enlist public attention. But it seems reasonable to surmise that we've never seen anything on  quite the scale of the operation that is unfolding right now. As I write these words, the photos of the two suspects are proliferating across the Web at phenomenal speed. And we're all networked now. We're all social media-enabled sharers now.  There's little question: The FBI has never had the means to mobilize as many eyeballs as quickly as it can now.</p><p>DesLaurier's comments are worth quoting in full:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/biggest_internet_manhunt_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/biggest_internet_manhunt_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The agony of Reddit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/the_agony_of_reddit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/the_agony_of_reddit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Find Boston Bombers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vigilantes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online vigilantes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Internet's front page doesn't like being tarred as a vigilante. But it also knows it is guilty]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reddit is very upset. "The media" is being mean. Multiple outlets are labeling the site's crowdsourced search for the Boston bombers as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/our_crowdmobbed_vigilante_future/">dangerous online vigilantism.</a> And yet, at the very same time, prominent media outlets -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/new_york_post_fingers_two_boston_bag_men/">namely the New York Post</a> -- are engaging in far worse behavior by plastering on their front page photos of supposed "suspects" who are in all likelihood completely innocent. Hypocrisy alert!</p><p>Reddit has a thin skin at the best of times. But in a moment of great national angst, tempers are especially prone to flaring. One Redditor even started a thread in the subreddit <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/findbostonbombers/">Find Boston Bombers</a> begging "the media" to be more responsible: <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/findbostonbombers/comments/1ck5hl/media_outlets_please_stop_making_the_images_of/">"Media Outlets, please stop making the images of potential suspects go viral, then blaming this small subreddit for it. And read the rules we've imposed before calling us 'vigilantes'."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/the_agony_of_reddit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/the_agony_of_reddit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our crowd-mobbed vigilante future</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/our_crowdmobbed_vigilante_future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/our_crowdmobbed_vigilante_future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online vigilantes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdmob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backpack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black backpack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boston's ugly truth: Social media plus ubiquitous video coverage makes everyone a sleuth, and a suspect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can almost feel the restless energy surging through the Web, oozing out of every computer, charging up a million smartphones with prosecutorial static electricity. A legion of Internet investigators are scrutinizing every available photo of the Boston Marathon finish line, searching for clues that will help nab a killer. At <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/findbostonbombers/">Reddit,</a> <a href="http://imgur.com/a/sUrnA">Imgur</a> and a zillion blogs, notes are being shared, theories propounded -- and, without question, innocent people are getting slandered.</p><p>Get used to it. This is the future. It's not pretty, but it's also not going away.</p><p>I won't deny it: The notion that we might be able to mobilize the awesome power of our social media networked hive mind to find the Boston bomber is seductive and compelling. It gets at the heart of one of the truths  we think we know about our networked age: Many eyes are better than one. Together we are strong. This is especially true in the Age of Ubiquitous Surveillance. The only machine capable of intelligently processing all the available photographs and video footage of any major public event these days is the networked human machine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/our_crowdmobbed_vigilante_future/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/our_crowdmobbed_vigilante_future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio is giving away free phones too?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Ingraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative echo chamber]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives launch an attack on the Florida senator after fatally misreading a new immigration bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, at least wacky conservative rumor-mongers are fair, in their own peculiar way. They seem just as willing to fire their brain-dead artillery at members of their own party as they are at Obama.</p><p>Remember the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/why_is_the_right_so_worked_up_about_obama_phones/">"Obama phone"</a> -- the completely ridiculous right-wing obsession on the idea that the Obama administration was handing out free phones to welfare recipients? Which turned out actually to be a Reagan-era program that provided discounts to low-income phone users?</p><p>Well, now there's a <a href="http://shark-tank.net/2013/04/17/move-over-obama-phone-say-hola-to-the-marco-rubio-immigration-phone/">"Marco phone"</a> -- as in Sen. Marco Rubio, proponent of a new immigration bill filed this week.</p><p>The Florida politics website <a href=" http://shark-tank.net/2013/04/17/move-over-obama-phone-say-hola-to-the-marco-rubio-immigration-phone/">the Shark Tank</a> "reports":</p><blockquote><p>According to the newly filed bill, immigrants who are allowed to enter the United States under a work visa, will be "granted" a taxpayer funded cellular phone. Move over “Obama phone,” we present the new ‘Hola, Como Estas?!’ MarcoPhone.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/marco_rubio_is_giving_away_free_phones_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is how you win the Internet economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/this_is_how_you_win_the_internet_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/this_is_how_you_win_the_internet_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clash of Clans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hay Farm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supercell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free to play]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay-to-win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile gaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mobile game developer Supercell has perfected a business model based on monetizing impatience]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to pay more attention to what my teenage son is up to. Two months ago<em>,</em> he said, "Dad, you should check out this 'Clash of Clans' game. There may be a story for you. It's <em>really</em> popular."</p><p>I filed his advice away in the recesses of my brain but didn't do anything about it. I'm frightened of addictive mobile gaming -- I spend too much time with my iPhone as it is.</p><p>But today, courtesy of <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2013/04/17/is-this-the-fastest-growing-game-company-ever/">a Forbes interview with Ilkka Paananen,</a> the CEO of mobile gaming start-up Supercell, I learned that "Clash of Clans" is an astonishing cash cow. The company is minting money on the one quality that almost every teenage boy possesses in unlimited abundance: impatience.</p><p>Supercell has just two games in Apple's App Store, "Hay Farm" and "Clash of Clans," but is raking in $2.4 million per day. According to Forbes, the company "grossed $100 million last year and $179 million in the first quarter of 2013 alone."</p><p>Those are huge numbers for a mobile gaming company. As Forbes' Karsten Strauss notes, if the company keeps the cash rolling in all year at the same rate, Supercell could get close to a billion-dollar year, which "would make it more than twice the size of Electronic Arts’ mobile games division, which has 900-plus iOS apps."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/this_is_how_you_win_the_internet_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/this_is_how_you_win_the_internet_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why ricin is so scary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_ricin_is_so_scary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_ricin_is_so_scary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-government militia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A do-it-your-self terrorist's dream: Reputedly easy to make and incredibly toxic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you should be alarmed at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/">the news that ricin,</a> an extraordinarily powerful poison for which there is no antidote, was detected on a letter sent to an as-yet-unnamed U.S. Senator.</p><p>Ricin is scary stuff, for a number of reasons. First, it is <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2004/feb/04/nation/na-primer4">reputedly relatively easy to manufacture,</a> by chemically processing the waste "mash" left over from making castor oil out of castor beans. Second, it's extremely potent: A dose the size of a grain of salt is lethal. Third, it seems inordinately popular with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incidents_involving_ricin">anti-government groups.</a> Most recently, in 2011, the FBI arrested <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incidents_involving_ricin">four members of a domestic militia group in the state of Georgia</a> on charges of plotting to deploy biological weapons. The men had <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/02/georgia-men-arrested-ricin-plot?newsfeed=true">discussed</a> manufacturing ricin and using it to target federal employees.</p><p>According to the Centers for Disease Control, <a href="http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/ricin/facts.asp"> there are rapid detection tests</a> for ricin that can determine its existence in environmental samples. The Wall Street Journal reports that all mail sent to members of Congress is tested offsite for a variety of toxins.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_ricin_is_so_scary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/why_ricin_is_so_scary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s CISPA privacy surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/obamas_cispa_privacy_surprise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/obamas_cispa_privacy_surprise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cispa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech lobby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citing weak civil liberty protections, the White House threatens to veto a cybersecurity bill ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's a sign of just how badly the Obama administration's record on civil liberties is regarded that the first reaction to <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/294247-white-house-issues-veto-threat-against-cispa-citing-privacy-concerns#ixzz2Qf7yrPcm/">the news</a> that the White House <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/113/saphr624r_20130416.pdf">is threatening to veto</a> the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) was a sense of surprise.</p><p>CISPA is designed to <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5900962/why-microsoft-and-facebook-are-pro+cispa-but-anti+sopa">make it easier</a> for private companies to share information about "cybersecurity" issues -- hacker attacks, Chinese sabotage, etc. --  with government agencies. Under CISPA companies such as Facebook or Microsoft could freely hand over personal information -- emails, texts, news feed postings -- without having to worry about potential negative consequences, including litigation from outraged users. Naturally, CISPA enjoys wide support from by the tech lobby; IBM sent more than 200 executives to Washington this week to push for its passage. The bill also enjoys bipartisan backing. The House of Representatives is set to vote on the bill either Wednesday or Thursday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/obamas_cispa_privacy_surprise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/obamas_cispa_privacy_surprise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Boston bombing privacy lesson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/the_boston_bombing_privacy_lesson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/the_boston_bombing_privacy_lesson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Tien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The surveillance state thrives on acts of terror. All the more reason why we need more protections for our rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a fair bet: Over the last 24 hours, the intensity of the American surveillance society reached an unprecedented fever pitch in Boston. Law enforcement authorities are tracing every cellphone call made at the time of the bombings, reviewing every email or text message associated with each "person of interest" identified in the investigation, and scrutinizing every second of <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/how-to/blog/bombings-in-boston-what-did-the-cameras-see-15352764?src=soc_twtr">available closed circuit video coverage.</a> You'd better hope you didn't recently Google how to make a homemade bomb or what the exact route of the Boston Marathon is, or save an oddly titled file in Dropbox or even just <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/a_facebook_lesson_for_terrorists/">like the wrong video on Facebook,</a><a> because someone, even now, is probably poring over that information. Events like the Boston Marathon bombings are what the surveillance state <em>lives</em> for. </a></p><p>"We will go to ends of the earth to find those responsible for this despicable crime,'' said FBI special agent Richard Deslauriers at a press conference in Boston on Tuesday morning. But what he really meant was <em>we will leave no digital stone unturned. Every one and zero will be interrogated.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/the_boston_bombing_privacy_lesson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/the_boston_bombing_privacy_lesson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>