<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andrew Leonard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andrew_leonard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia&#8217;s anti-Pagan crusade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/wikipedias_anti_pagan_crusade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/wikipedias_anti_pagan_crusade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neo-pagans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neopaganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Clark Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qworty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Jay Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A rogue editor targeted witches, warlocks and psychedelic scientists -- and cast doubt on the site's judgment ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Nov. 19, 2012, the Wikipedia page for the writer David Jay Brown was deleted. Not just hidden from sight to the casual reader, or cut to pieces by an overzealous editor, but removed once and for all. Despite his having authored numerous books and his appearances on multiple TV shows, the consensus view of the Wikipedia editors who cared to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/David_Jay_Brown"> consider the matter</a> deemed Brown <em>not notable</em> enough for inclusion in the online encyclopedia.</p><p>"Qworty" -- the Wikipedia editor unmasked as <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/">the writer Robert Clark Young</a> in Salon one week ago -- played a leading role in instigating Brown's deletion. As Qworty, Young denounced Brown as a "self-appointed spiritual savior" who had styled himself "a modern-day messiah who combined all of the powers of Jesus and Freud and Einstein and Marx and, oh why the heck not, Timothy Leary, lol." Young also resorted to his go-to critique for Wikipedia pages he found wanting: He accused Brown of repeatedly editing his own page in violation of Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest policies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/wikipedias_anti_pagan_crusade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/wikipedias_anti_pagan_crusade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Maker kids are alright</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_maker_kids_are_alright/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_maker_kids_are_alright/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maker Faire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maker movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Make magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d.i.y. DIY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13306332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want my electric-powered cupcake car and I want it now. A trip to the Maker Faire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don't see <a href="http://www.evilmadscientist.com/2013/bamf/">bicycle-powered cardboard rhinos</a> every day. But when you nearly stumble into one at a <a href="http://makerfaire.com/">Maker Faire,</a> you don't even blink. After just a few hours spent navigating one's way though twirling electric-powered cupcake cars and dashing steam-punk-attired ladies and gentlemen, you become well-trained to expect the incongruous and delightfully absurd. And you start thinking, <em>hmm ... I've got a lot of cardboard in my basement ... what completely bonkers thing can I do with?</em></p><p>Mark Frauenfelder, editor in chief of Make Magazine, calls the Faire "a magic space-time moment." I can't argue. The Maker Faire my son and I visited in San Mateo, Calif., on Saturday pulsated with a vibe so enthusiastic, so healthy, so creative, and so gosh-darn <em>happy</em> it was impossible not to get swept away. If the hands-on, funky robot, DIY delirious madness of the Maker Faire offers us a clue as to where the culture is headed this century, then guess what: Maybe things aren't going to be so bad, after all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_maker_kids_are_alright/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/the_maker_kids_are_alright/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s biggest sin: Popularity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irish sandwich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Double Dutch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carl levin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why was CEO Tim Cook standing trial for "crimes" all his peers have committed? Because everyone loves their iPhones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's causing me heartburn to admit this out loud, but when I saw the first tweet reporting Rand Paul's declaration that Congress was bullying Apple and forcing it to sit through a "show trial" -- as if CEO Tim Cook was a member of the Bolshevik old guard about to be purged by Joseph Stalin on bogus conspiracy charges -- I found myself inclined to agree with the Kentucky senator.</p><p>I don't condone <a href=" http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/20/how-to-make-30-billion-and-pay-no-corporate-income-tax-the-apple-way/">Apple's tax-avoidance schemes,</a> but the company is hardly alone in taking advantage of loopholes in U.S and Irish tax law. The Wikipedia page that details the two key strategies employed by Apple, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Irish_arrangement">the Double Irish and Dutch Sandwich,</a> lists 12 other major U.S. corporations that are pulling the same flim-flam. Among them are Apple's tech sector colleagues -- Google, Microsoft, Oracle, Facebook and Adobe Systems -- along with General Electric, Pfizer, Johnson &amp; Johnson and Starbucks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/apples_biggest_sin_popularity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia cleans up its mess</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/wikipedia_cleans_up_its_mess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/wikipedia_cleans_up_its_mess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Clark Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qworty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jimbo wales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Banned, blocked, investigated; the online encyclopedia casts a harsh eye on Robert Clark Young, aka "Qworty" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wrath of Wikipedia has fallen hard on Robert Clark Young, aka "Qworty," the novelist/Wikipedia editor who took advantage of online anonymity <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/">to pursue vendettas against other writers</a> with whom he had long been feuding. "Malicious editing in conflict of interest" is a venal Wikipedia sin, and Qworty's entire history of editing is now being scoured from top to bottom.</p><p>Qworty has been <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Qworty&amp;oldid=555676217#May_2013 ">"blocked indefinitely"</a> from editing for violating Wikipedia's policies on how to write biographies of living persons, " harassment and (frankly) repeatedly lying to the community." An <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Qworty">investigation</a> is also currently under way to determine whether Young was guilty of operating multiple "sock puppets" -- pseudonymous personas designed specifically to hide Young's true identity. The backlash has been so fierce that both Qworty's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Qworty">User page</a> and Talk page have been <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Courtesy_blanking">"blanked as a courtesy,</a>" presumably to protect the pages from repeat vandalism by his angry editor colleagues.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/wikipedia_cleans_up_its_mess/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/wikipedia_cleans_up_its_mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t cry climate-change wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornadoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moore tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For now, blaming the Moore, Okla., tornado on global warming is bad science and bad politics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as pictures and videos of the devastation in Moore, Oklahoma, started to spread through social media networks, so too did the angry and anguished tweets about climate change.</p><p>[embedtweet id="336595951336685568"]</p><p>It's an understandable reaction. We don't know for sure yet, but Monday's tornado may turn out to be the worst ever on record. In the larger context of a world in which extreme weather events appear to be increasing in frequency and intensity, it's natural to look for a culprit when confronted with unthinkable carnage.</p><p>In the New Yorker, Amy Davidson <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/05/a-tornado-hits-moore-oklahoma.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">reflected the same urge,</a> while being careful not to make a direct connection between climate change and tornadoes.</p><blockquote><p>Every extreme weather event these days provokes questions about climate change; that is because, as Elizabeth Kolbert notes in this week’s Comment, the climate has changed extremely. Tornadoes, as it happens, have been an area of some controversy: two years ago saw a spike, but then last year a low. We’ll see; it will be for scientists to sort out how currents and temperatures and other factors fed into this storm. <em>Climate change means, more than all the lines on charts always going in one direction, that the weather rhythms we think we know by heart, and that we’ve built our cities and lives around, are all out of sync.</em></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/dont_cry_climate_change_wolf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>115</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to screw up Tumblr</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/how_to_screw_up_tumblr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/how_to_screw_up_tumblr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GeoCities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Meyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer promises not to bungle a good thing. Easier said than done ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In her announcement of Yahoo's purchase of Tumblr for $1.1 billion, CEO Marissa Mayer promised <a href=" http://yahoo.tumblr.com/post/50902111638/tumblr-yahoo">"We won't screw this up."</a> Rhetorically, that's almost always a bad move. For a CEO, not screwing something up should be the default position, the operating assumption. The possibility of failure need not, and should not, ever be voiced. As soon as you make a promise like that explicit, you sow more doubt and uncertainty into an already fertile territory of fear.</p><p>Mayer was trying to be hip, trying to reassure Tumbler's young userbase in the same language that the blogging service's founder and CEO, David Karp, uses to communicates with his audience. Karp signed off his announcement of the deal with <a href=" http://staff.tumblr.com/post/50902268806/news">a gleeful "Fuck yeah."</a> But note the difference: Karp exuded confidence while Mayer projected massive corporate low self-esteem.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/how_to_screw_up_tumblr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/how_to_screw_up_tumblr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Qworty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Clark Young]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sock puppets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barry Hannah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Wales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unmasking of a writer who took extraordinary advantage of online anonymity to pursue old vendettas ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wee hours of the morning of January 27, 2013, a Wikipedia editor named "Qworty" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barry_Hannah&amp;action=history">made a series of 14 separate edits</a> to the Wikipedia page for the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Hannah">late writer Barry Hannah</a>, a well-regarded Southern author with a taste for the Gothic and absurd.</p><p>Qworty cut paragraphs that included quotes from Hannah's work. He removed 20 links to interviews, obituaries and reminiscences concerning Hannah. He cut out a list of literary prizes Hannah had won.</p><p>Two edits stand out. Qworty <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barry_Hannah&amp;diff=next&amp;oldid=535077291">excised the phrase</a> "and was regarded as a good mentor" from a sentence that started: "Hannah taught creative writing for 28 years at the University of Mississippi, where he was director of its M.F.A. program ..." And he changed the cause of Hannah's death from <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barry_Hannah&amp;diff=535085939&amp;oldid=535085792">"natural causes" to "alcoholism."</a> But Hannah's obituaries stated that he had died of a heart attack and been clean and sober for years before his death, while his role as a mentor was testified to in numerous memorials. (Another editor later removed the alcoholism edit.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/revenge_ego_and_the_corruption_of_wikipedia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>192</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacker won&#8217;t help Saudi spies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/the_hacker_and_the_saudi_spies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/the_hacker_and_the_saudi_spies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saudi Arabia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security vulnerabilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moxie Marlinspike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXCLUSIVE: A security researcher pulls back the curtain on hacker-industrial complex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you do when you're a hacker specializing in secure communications protocols, and you get a request to help the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia spy on its own people? For San Francisco's Moxie Marlinspike, <a href="http://www.thoughtcrime.org/about.html">a respected computer security expert,</a> the experience provoked <a href="http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/saudi-surveillance/">a thoughtful examination of the current state of hacker culture</a>.</p><p>Not so long ago, hackers often perceived themselves as standing in opposition to authority and governments. Moreover, the subcategory of hackers who specialized in discovering and publicizing security vulnerabilities -- referred to as "exploits" in the security trade -- did so out of a belief that the best way to improve the integrity of our communication systems was by publicizing dangerous security holes.</p><p>Times have changed. As Joseph Menn documented in <a href="http://www.yahoo.com/special-report-u-cyberwar-strategy-stokes-fear-blowback-110055163.html">a breakthough special report for Reuters last week,</a> today's security-minded hackers often end up working directly for defense contractors, hand in hand with the U.S. government. Identifying exploits and selling them off to the highest bidder has become a lucrative business. Worst of all, the buyers of these exploits aren't interested in improving security, but instead often plan to deploy these vulnerabilities for their own purposes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/the_hacker_and_the_saudi_spies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/the_hacker_and_the_saudi_spies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESPN&#8217;s plan to kill net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESPN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bandwidth caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data caps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allowing the sports network to buy its way free of data caps on your mobile device is a very bad idea]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are someone who likes to watch live sports events on your mobile phone, then it is probably welcome news that <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324059704578473400083982568.html">ESPN may be in negotiations with a big telecom company</a> to exempt its streaming video services from  caps that limit how much data mobile users can download. Watching the NBA playoffs on your iPhone, without any free Wi-Fi to rely on, is an excellent way to chew speedily through your allotted bandwidth for the month. ESPN, reports the Wall Street Journal, wants to ensure that viewers get to eat as much cake as they want (and, of course, therefore be exposed to as many ESPN-delivered advertisements as possible).</p><p>But if you're not an ESPN addict, you might do well to look askance at the news. That's the take of Public Knowledge, a consumer-interest Washington-based public advocacy organization that quickly decried the possible ESPN deal as <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/blog/fcc-what-net-neutrality-violation-looks">an obvious violation of the principle of "net neutrality."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/espns_plan_to_bust_the_internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Fake Shower</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/app_of_the_week_fake_shower/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/app_of_the_week_fake_shower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fake Shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Akatu Fake Shower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bathroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toilet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baudrillard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pure genius: A cure for bathroom embarrassment that conserves vital natural resources]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You've been there. You know you have. You're in the bathroom, engaged in some completely normal excretory functions. You start to feel embarrassed at the possibility that someone outside the bathroom door might hear the appalling sounds emanating from your nether regions. The prospect of inflicting such unpleasantness on innocent ears is intolerable! So you crank up the sink faucet or turn on the shower, hoping the sound of running water will give you cover.</p><p>And then you feel a different kind of shame, a sense of environmental guilt at having wasted precious natural resources just to disguise the sound of something that everyone does, every single day.</p><p>I won't lie. This exact scenario has plagued me ever since I moved into my current rental, in which the only bathroom in the house opens up into both bedrooms. The acoustics are amazing! My son can hear everything. I know full well that my embarrassment is a product of some awful mix of repression and shame about my natural body that 25 years of living in Berkeley should have exorcised long ago, but I guess I was just scarred for life that one time my grandmother criticized me for farting in public when I was 6 years old. Even the bathroom hasn't been a safe refuge ever since!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/app_of_the_week_fake_shower/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/app_of_the_week_fake_shower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of television: Zombie gamers gone wild</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/the_future_of_television_zombie_gamers_gone_wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/the_future_of_television_zombie_gamers_gone_wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machinima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamer culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Machinima network succeeds by giving the "lost boy" generation exactly what it wants: Terrible TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Head shot, bitch, you just got owned! Yo, are you newbies going to help me capture this flag, or are you just going to stand there with each other's dicks in your hands?"</p><p>Spoken by a young man in gamer mode -- wearing microphone-equipped headphones, his hands gripping his game controller, staring frownily into his console screen -- those gracious words are the first line spoken <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPsJUXYiohs">in the first episode of "The Clan"</a> -- a comedy series that debuted in April on <a href="https://www.youtube.com/user/MachinimaPrime?feature=watch">Machinima Prime,</a> one of YouTube's most high-profile "channels." The opening dialogue is representative of what follows. It's no accident the show kicks off with an aggro verbal fusillade. It's a calculated statement of purpose.</p><p>I've watched three episodes of "The Clan" and I am still unsure as to whether the series is best understood as postmodern cynical satire lampooning gamer culture, or is it really a faithful reflection of the emerging worldview of the "lost boy" gamer demographic. Or maybe "The Clan" is just lousy. Does it even matter? Ultimately, such questions are not for me to decide, since I'm not a "lost boy" and therefore I am not of interest to the <a href="http://machinima.com/">Machinima "network."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/the_future_of_television_zombie_gamers_gone_wild/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/the_future_of_television_zombie_gamers_gone_wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Facebook Home disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The people have spoken: Nobody wants to live in Mark Zuckerberg's gated community ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviews are in: Facebook Home, Mark Zuckerberg's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/facebook_wants_to_steal_your_soul/">grandiose stab at totally controlling our mobile experience</a>, is an unmitigated disaster.</p><p>On Wednesday, AT&amp;T announced that it was <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/05/09/after-only-a-month-the-facebook-phone-is-down-to-99-cents/">dropping the price</a> of the HTC First smartphone, which comes with Facebook Home built in, from $99 to <em>99 cents.</em> Think about that: a new smartphone, priced to jump off the shelves at Dollar General. It's a great deal, but it is also hugely embarrassing for Zuckerberg.</p><p>A little over a month ago, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/who_would_anyone_want_a_facebook_phone/">I wrote that the only way I could see a Facebook phone making sense</a> was if Facebook planned to cut deals with the phone carriers to give the phone away for free. But such a strategy doesn't seem to be what's in play here. Best guess, no one wants to buy a Facebook phone.</p><p>For confirmation we need only look at the Google Play store, where the Facebook Home app, which can be installed on select Android phones, has now fallen to the No. 338 ranking in the category of free apps. That's 200 spots lower than it ranked just two weeks ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/the_facebook_home_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spock blows it with the ladies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/spock_blows_it_with_the_ladies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/spock_blows_it_with_the_ladies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube Trends Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends Map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trending topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[He Stopped Loving Her Today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim McGraw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13293127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lesson from YouTube's Trends Map: Women are romantic, unless Vulcans are involved]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men like Spock. Women are more interested in Amanda Berry's rescuer Charles Ramsey. Teenage boys like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROrpKx3aIjA ">watching things blow up</a> and getting a chance to win in-game currency to buy cool weapons for online gaming. Teenage girls are checking out Tim McGraw singing with Taylor Swift.</p><p>I learned these zeitgeist tidbits by spending about an hour perusing the latest neat thing from Google, the YouTube Trends Map. It's the video equivalent of Twitter's trending topics feature, with the added ability to break down categories by gender, age and geographic location. Want to know what 13-17-year-old girls in the East are watching compared to 55-64-year-old guys in California? The Trends Map will show you.</p><p>The world is watching around 6 billion hours of YouTube video every month, which suggests that the insights to be gained from spying on viewer habits should be culturally meaningful. For example, I did not realize quite how gendered love of Spock is. Right now <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPkByAkAdZs"> the Audi ad featuring Leonard Nimoy (old Spock) battling it out with Zachary Quinto (new Spock)</a> is the most watched video for men of all ages. But it doesn't even show up in the top five for women of all ages.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/spock_blows_it_with_the_ladies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/spock_blows_it_with_the_ladies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s wiretap America</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/obamas_wiretap_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/obamas_wiretap_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wiretapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vastly expanded surveillance powers for a government that already plays too fast and loose with our data? Bad idea]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the surveillance state just take another gigantic Big Brotherish step forward? The New York Times and Washington Post are reporting that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/us/politics/obama-may-back-fbi-plan-to-wiretap-web-users.html?hp">Obama administration is planning to support</a> an FBI plan for "a sweeping overhaul of surveillance laws that would make it easier to wiretap people who communicate using the Internet rather than by traditional phone services."</p><p>Facebook posts, Skype calls, Google chats, Apple's iMessage -- under the new plan, every form of Internet communication would have to be accessible to law enforcement wiretapping. Civil libertarians, Internet companies and privacy activists are all understandably unenthused. A blogger at FireDogLake immediately labeled the news proof that Obama intended to support the <a href="http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/05/08/obama-on-the-verge-of-supporting-end-of-4th-amendment-on-the-internet/">"end of the 4th Amendment on the Internet."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/obamas_wiretap_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/obamas_wiretap_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad day to be a porn lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prenda Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An angry judge -- and huge "Star Trek" fan -- blasts the sleazy Prenda Law firm into oblivion ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his <a href="http://ia601508.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.543744/gov.uscourts.cacd.543744.130.0.pdf">"Order Issuing Sanctions"</a> on a half-dozen sleazy lawyers who specialized in pornography copyright litigation, California District Judge Otis D. Wright II writes like a man expecting the entire Internet to go gaga over his every word.</p><p>The opening two paragraphs deserve reprinting in full:</p><blockquote><p>Plaintiffs have outmaneuvered the legal system. They’ve discovered the nexus of antiquated copyright laws, paralyzing social stigma, and unaffordable defense costs. And they exploit this anomaly by accusing individuals of illegally downloading a single pornographic video. Then they offer to settle -- for a sum calculated to be just below the cost of a bare-bones defense. For these individuals, resistance is futile; most reluctantly pay rather than have their names associated with illegally downloading porn. So now, copyright laws originally designed to compensate starving artists allow starving attorneys in this electronic-media era to plunder the citizenry.</p> <p>Plaintiffs do have a right to assert their intellectual-property rights, so long as they do it right. But Plaintiffs filing of cases using the same boilerplate complaint against dozens of defendants raised the Courts alert. It was when the Court realized Plaintiffs engaged their cloak of shell companies and fraud that the Court went to battlestations.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube builds a paywall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/youtube_builds_a_paywall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/youtube_builds_a_paywall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premium content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evolution or a giant step backward? The video site plans to introduce premium subscription-only channels]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I heard today that YouTube is going to make everybody watch videos on a rectangular box that only broadcasts in black-and-white and requires that you have to get up off of your couch in order to change the channel.</p><p>No wait, that's wrong -- that's the story I used to tell my kids when I wanted to scare the living daylights out of them right before bedtime. Today's real YouTube story, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/c27c9856-b3fd-11e2-b5a5-00144feabdc0.html#ixzz2SXsRle6O">according to the Financial Times,</a> is that YouTube plans to start charging subscriptions for as many as 50 "channels," possibly as early as this week. These new channels will compete with Hulu and Netflix to provide high-quality streaming content, for a price -- in YouTube's case, $1.99 a month per channel.</p><blockquote><p>Cable and satellite channels, which traditionally rely on a dual revenue stream model, are eyeing YouTube’s subscription service to generate revenue from older shows and new programming, according to another person familiar with the project.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/youtube_builds_a_paywall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/youtube_builds_a_paywall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook and Google are the new Exxon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/facebook_and_google_are_the_new_exxon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/facebook_and_google_are_the_new_exxon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[special interests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook and Google the new Exxon? Lobbying dollars crush opposition]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the maxim "where California leads, the nation follows" is still true, we shouldn't be expecting any positive movement on tougher privacy laws at the federal level any time soon. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-digital-privacy-20130503,0,7322818.story">The L.A. Times reported on Friday</a> that "a powerful coalition of technology companies and business lobbies" -- including Facebook and Google -- quashed a digital privacy bill that would have made California "the first state to take direct aim at an online industry that stockpiles and trades in a wide range of personal data about nearly every adult in the United States."</p><p>At this stage of the game we probably don't need any more reminders that the last thing online services want to see happen is for their users to gain any meaningful control about how their personal information is exploited. Or, for that matter, about how lobbying money routinely skews public policy against the public interest. The new money of Silicon Valley is just the same as the old money of Wall Street or the fossil fuel industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/facebook_and_google_are_the_new_exxon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/facebook_and_google_are_the_new_exxon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>App of the Week: Google Now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app of the week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Now]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Siri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you want the Star Trek computer, you're going to have to give your entire life over to the Starship Enterprise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like any good geek, I want my own <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2013/04/google_has_a_single_towering_obsession_it_wants_to_build_the_star_trek_computer.html">Star Trek computer</a>. You know, like the one that spoke with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majel_Barrett">Majel Barrett's</a> voice and was able to answer any question Captain Kirk or Picard might pose, in depth, and then <em>take action</em> as directed. Apple's Siri might be a step on the way there, but Siri, so far, at least, has some severe limitations. Like, I'm not really sure she truly <em>understands</em> me.</p><p>So I was delighted to hear the news this week that Google's "Siri-killer," Google Now, had finally been released for the iOS platform. Google has made it absolutely clear that one of the company's prime directives is to create a working Star Trek computer. Google seems as likely as anyone to get there first.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/app_of_the_week_google_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Facebook could blow it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/facebooks_impossible_dream/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/facebooks_impossible_dream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook earnings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pledge to give users the power to block the ads they hate is a promise the social network can't keep]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I received an email from a Facebook public relations person just a little before midnight Wednesday, or about 10 hours after I posted <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/">my rant about Facebook mobile advertisements and giant-breasted zombie-stalkers</a>. The spokesperson sought an opportunity to chat about the work Facebook was doing "to improve the controls people have over the ads they see on mobile."</p><p>So we chatted. The big news: Facebook promises that within just a couple of weeks mobile users will get new controls that will allow us to block specific advertisers. These controls will be similar to those that currently exist for the desktop Facebook experience. Individual Facebook users can decide for themselves how excited they are by this pledge. As I wrote on Wednesday, Facebook's track record on the desktop advertising experience leaves something to be desired. (To be fair, Facebook's spokeperson acknowledged that the company's ad-delivery algorithms are not "perfect.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/facebooks_impossible_dream/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/facebooks_impossible_dream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook is blowing it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Zuckerberg won't let me turn off the spammy online dating ads on my smartphone. It's a big mistake]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While waiting for my coffee to brew this morning, I checked my Facebook News Feed on my iPhone. But instead of amusing updates from friends and family, in the space of just a few flicks of my thumb, I was assaulted by not one, not two, but <em>three</em> different advertisements for online dating sites. Worst of all, there she was, <em>again!</em> That giant-breasted zombie stalker from Mate1.com who has been chasing me across Facebook for years!</p><p>I know she's not real. I know she's just an advertisement. But I'm still terrified of that woman. I have nightmares of getting crushed by her mammary glands, squeezed to death like a boa constrictor kills a wild pig. I don't ever want to see her again, but no matter how I try, I just can't quit her.</p><p>When first we met, in my pre-smartphone days, she flashed her soulless come-hither eyes at me from Facebook's right-hand column. I swiftly learned how to click "hide this ad" and "hide all from Mate1.com." I'm a social media take-charge kind of guy -- tweaking privacy and ad settings comes naturally to me. But then, a couple of years later, not long (and not uncoincidentally) after Facebook's IPO, she invaded my News Feed. Once again, I dutifully clicked "hide this ad" and "hide all," albeit this time with a little less faith in the honorable intentions of Facebook's ad-targeting algorithms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/facebook_is_blowing_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
