<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Andy Battaglia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/andy_battaglia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The biggest beat of all</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/14/two_step/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/14/two_step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/feature/2001/06/14/two_step</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A short introduction to two-step garage, followed by everything you need to know about pop music in the 21st century.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's 3 a.m. in the downstairs lounge at Centro-Fly, New York's mod-mad nightclub, and the walls are dancing. Really. The floor-to-ceiling panels that line the room are spazzing out, taking split-second turns emitting these blinking stripes of bright pink light. The flashes are short and clipped, jumping from panel to panel with quantum-mechanical ease. The dizzying, strobelike effect is nothing new to dance clubs. But there's something about the vibe down here, in the Pinky Room, that makes it particularly warm and inviting -- like a smooth, soothing sip of incandescent visual fizz. </p><p>The main room upstairs is throbbing with the ceaseless bass of house music, that four-to-the-floor boom-boom-boom-boom that has been dance music's go-to sound for ages. The tourists are into it, as are the curiously made-up girls from New Jersey and the few lady-slaying sailors in town for Fleet Week. There's a big-room purposefulness to the music upstairs, a workhorselike aspect to its time-tested thump. It's the kind of music people want when they drop $20 every now and then to do the dance-club thing. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/14/two_step/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/14/two_step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Radiohead&#8217;s &#8220;Kid A&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/radiohead_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/radiohead_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2000 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/feature/2000/10/25/radiohead</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this really an "important" record? Four critics duke it out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Andrew Goodwin:</b> The critic Theodor Adorno, dismayed by the possibilities for classical structures in a broken world, once argued that "art of the highest caliber pushes beyond totality towards a state of fragmentation." He wasn't writing about rock music in the 21st century. And he didn't write the liner notes for "Kid A." But his words were, as ever, prescient in the extreme. </p><p>Alongside Oasis, Elastica, Pulp and Blur, Radiohead were one of five candidates to head up the so-called British Invasion of the 1990s, and if Blur's Damon Albarn isn't choking on his press cuttings right now, I for one will be surprised. Like Blur, Radiohead took one look at "success" and decided to rewrite the rule book. </p><p>Think about it. Elastica? Six years to follow up their debut album, and they come back with ... more of the same. Pulp? The inspiration for a thousand sad bedroom soliloquies have been silent for over two years. Oasis? Their implosion was as ugly as it was predictable. Only Blur and Radiohead have lasted the course; and their tactics, like U2 before them, consisted of following up a brace of smash-hit records with a barrage of dirty, spaced-out noise. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/radiohead_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/25/radiohead_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/31/oval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/31/oval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/07/31/oval</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with Oval's latest is that, like most minimal electronica, it's more fun to talk about than to listen to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oval <br> "Ovalprocess" <br> (Thrill Jockey) <br> </p><p>Electronic music's soft spot for shoptalk has never been its sexiest attribute. While hardcore devotees get all philosophical about the genre's relationship with technology, detractors write the whole thing off as a soulless dalliance between programmers and their machines. No matter your allegiance, it's hard to get too wrapped up in the music's post-human mystique while flipping through dance magazines made fat by ads for the newest decks and effects. </p><p>Still, all forms of electronica owe a good bit of their conceptual subtext to process. In terms of expressed intent, it's what separates dance-floor techno from mindless disco, and ambient experimentation from the New Age. </p><p>Oval's Markus Popp has built his whole career out of toying with the notion of process. When his landmark "Systemisch" album hit the racks in 1996, its twisted, ambient mix of skipping CD sounds and slow-rolling static exposed the entire techno template by freeing it from its musical duties. Thin, brittle click tracks worked to mark time and meter, but not in a way that had any real rhythmic presence. Similarly, any recognizable features from the traditional ambient soundscape were notable more for their almost narrative shifts than their suggestions of melody. Popp was undoubtedly working in the realm of "music," but he seemed more concerned with exposing the limitations of the term than acknowledging its accepted role as a medium. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/31/oval/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/31/oval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/britney_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/britney_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Britney Spears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/06/19/britney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget the schoolgirl skirts and the psychosexual interpretations. Britney Spears sings calculatedly brilliant hits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britney Spears<br> "Oops! ... I Did It Again"<br> Jive </p><p>Just in case her thigh-high schoolgirl skirts and navel-on-parade routines are too subtle, <a href="/ent/feature/2000/05/22/britney/index.html">Britney Spears</a> asserts that she's "not that innocent" on her new single, "Oops! ... I Did It Again." As a don't-go-there anthem from teenie pop's most <a href="/people/col/reit/2000/05/02/nptues/index.html">forbidden fruit,</a> the song makes for a sweetly sadistic companion piece to the masochism lite lurking beneath her debut, <a href="/ent/music/review/1999/08/27/spears/index.html">"... Baby One More Time."</a> "It might seem like a crush, but it doesn't mean that I'm serious," sings the cattier Britney 2000. </p><p>Yet even as she invites her would-be suitor to talk to the hand -- "I'm a goob magnet, man," she told Cosmo Girl magazine -- she rubs up against her words, crossing her tease and batting her eyes with arched-back growls and cool space-kitten purrs. Sung so suggestively, a line like "To lose all my senses/That is just so typically me" comes off less as a lamentable self-realization than as a lip-licking appeal to the sordid powers of imagination. And in spite of its exclamation point, her hardhearted cry of "Oops!" sounds more like a conscienceless dismissal than a conscious apology. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/britney_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/19/britney_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uncertain, unfair and bloodthirsty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/smith_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/smith_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/feature/2000/06/14/smith</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mystic and record collector Harry Smith knew life was cruel, yet his folk "Anthology" promised a way to "see America changed by music."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Various Artists, edited by Harry Smith<br> "Anthology of American Folk Music, Vol. 4"<br> Revenant </p><p><b>Andy Battaglia:</b> Digging into Harry Smith's "Anthology of American Folk Music" means grappling with the shadowy realms of alchemy and black magic. If mindful folk music collided with mindless rock 'n' roll to form a sort of perfect storm in the '60s, then Smith was without a doubt the mystic rainmaker. When his original three-volume <a href="/music/sharps/1997/10/06smith.html">"Anthology"</a> was released in 1952 it gave the folk scene a swift kick in the jeans by exposing strumming idealists to what Greil Marcus called the "old, weird America." From the collection of rural shakedowns, murder ballads and possessed hymns of the '20s and '30s came Bob Dylan, who tired of folk's insularity and <a href="/ent/music/feature/1998/11/11feature.html">traveled rockward</a> to move the people, change the world, etc. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/smith_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/14/smith_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/scott_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/scott_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2000 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/06/13/scott</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early electronic composer Raymond Scott dreamed of today's digital future -- in the 1950s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--sara's 2nd test-->"Someday, science tells us, we'll be able to clean our walls electronically. But right now we all depend on ... Spic & Span." This was the kind of ad jingle that came out of Manhattan Research Inc., the wholesale electronic music workshop founded by Raymond Scott in the 1950s. A prototypical midcentury electronic musician, Scott lived in a world of room-size synthesizers and interplanetary test frequencies. He built music machines with things like thyratron tubes and unijunction transmitters, while dreaming of compositions that could stream telepathically from the writer to the listener. But unlike his mostly academic peers, such as John Cage and <a href="/ent/music/review/2000/02/04/stockhausen/index.html">Karlheinz Stockhausen,</a> Scott saw a viable future for electronic sound outside the research lab and in the marketplace. His music was like aural Tang for a generation geared up to go to the moon. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/scott_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/scott_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/green_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/green_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/04/13/green</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From "Ha!" to "Hallelujah," the Rev. Al Green&#039;s gospel hits held onto the earthly sound of sweet salvation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>B</b>elieve what you will about matters of faith, but when the  Rev. Al Green sings, there simply must be a God. A voice so divine could not exist otherwise.</p><p>Green's power as a gospel singer, heard again and again on "Greatest Gospel Hits," begins with his history as one of the consummate soul men of the 1970s. As he poked around R&B's G spot, his holy trinity had more to do with sex, love and desire than fathers, sons and holy spirits. His quintessential soul hit, "Let's Stay Together" (1972), was an earthy opera delivered at an overwhelmingly sensual pitch. But even when his libretto was heavy on libido, his voice sounded as if it was searching for resolution well beyond mere earthly delights.</p><p>Green's relationship with gospel has always been a stormy one. At 18, he was thrown out of his own family's gospel group when his God-fearing father caught him listening to a Jackie Wilson record. (So secular!) Years later, after his remarkable success on the soul circuit and much wrangling over conflicted allegiances to both Saturday night and Sunday morning, he turned back to his religious roots.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/green_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/13/green_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/oasis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/oasis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/03/14/oasis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What happens when a band like Oasis, known for youthful swagger and insouciance, actually grow up? You fall asleep of boredom.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he current issue of British culture magazine the Face features the sardonic headline, "Daddy, who were the Stone Roses?" To a Brit-rock fan, it's a pointed blast at both the Roses (onetime British superstars who haven't been heard from lately) and at a past littered with hyped-up bands who ultimately folded under the weight of history. Oasis, the one group of its class to have  become worldwide stars, must be feeling the sting more than any of their peers. The group has always balanced its pose as crotchety old souls with its nose-thumbing, <a href="/music/live/1998/01/28live.html">fuck-all attitude to the weight of rock history.</a> But the band members aren't getting any younger, and such confrontational charm can only wear thin.</p><p>The matter of age pokes at Oasis' fourth studio album, "Standing on the Shoulder of Giants," like a needling young punk ready to write off the band as gray and gone. It's a strange matter to raise about a band that released its first album in 1994, but pop music moves fast, especially at the grand level Oasis tries to operate on. Given their self-aggrandizing histrionics, brothers Noel and Liam Gallagher would look silly the day they fail to be at least a candidate for biggest band in the world. Even if it could be argued that such a day came and went after the underwhelming <a href="/sept97/sharps/sharps970902.html">"Be Here Now"</a> (1997), the same result applies even more so when Oasis starts to sound like the parents of kids who don't know the Stone Roses from the Big Bopper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/oasis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/14/oasis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/29/yolatengo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/29/yolatengo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/feature/2000/02/29/yolatengo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yo La Tengo&#039;s Ira Kaplan talks about his downtown jazz, boho marriage and stately new record.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>O</b>n their glorious new album, "And Then Nothing Turned Itself Inside-Out," Yo La Tengo free-associate dub, folk, electronica, experimental rock and vaguely jazzlike phrasing into a 77-minute document of stylized style mining. The group's every utterance, however, is instantly recognizable. After 13 years of making music together, the trio -- who call both Hoboken, N.J., and Brooklyn, N.Y., home -- musically wink at one another like old friends acknowledging thoughts already well understood.</p><p>It's a sustained conversation that hears subtlety as giddy screams -- and one that helps the new album sound both exactly like and not at all related to any Yo La Tengo record before it. The familiar reference points are all there: Ira Kaplan's guitar dramas, Georgia Hubley's finessed drumming, James McNew's loudly understated bass, the trio's shared wistful vocals. But cast in a newly consistent atmosphere -- all lazy dusks and distant, cotton-pulled cloud masses -- they articulate more than the band has ever attempted to translate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/29/yolatengo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/29/yolatengo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://play.rbn.com/?url=salon/salon/g2demand/audio/yola/yola_saturday_28.smi&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://play.rbn.com/?url=salon/salon/g2demand/audio/yola/yola_saturday_64.smi&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://play.rbn.com/?url=salon/salon/g2demand/audio/yola/yola_orlando_28.smi&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://play.rbn.com/?url=salon/salon/g2demand/audio/yola/yola_orlando_64.smi&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://play.rbn.com/?url=salon/salon/g2demand/audio/yola/yola_youcan_28.smi&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
<enclosure url="http://play.rbn.com/?url=salon/salon/g2demand/audio/yola/yola_youcan_64.smi&amp;amp" length="0" type="audio/x-pn-realaudio" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clickscuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clickscuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/02/08/clickscuts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Clicks + Cuts" reconciles avant-electronic music with the politics of dancing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>M</b>uch to its credit, electronic dance music has always played fast and loose with its own history. A hugely sprawling form hyped on progress, it seems to announce a new aesthetic revolution every few weeks. Movements divide into micromovements, which then splinter into even smaller subsets, which in turn fan out into different camps, and so on. Each gets its own name, its own <a href="/ent/music/review/2000/01/20/modulations/index.html">historical precursors,</a> its own migration lines, its own self-aware philosophy. And even if, like the high sciences, these variations get parsed out in a language largely impenetrable to those not obsessed with obscure nuance, at the very least they stand in for electronica's heartening faith in meaningful change.</p><p>Underlying that spirit, though, is a conflict over the importance of the music's dance roots. Fans of the unfortunately named IDM (Intelligent Dance Music; ugh) consider danceability a sort of blight on their new language, while dance-floor populists dismiss the former as obnoxiously cerebral and pretentious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clickscuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clickscuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/stockhausen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/stockhausen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/02/04/stockhausen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stockhausen&#039;s "Helicopter String Quartet" gives a whole new meaning to in-flight recording.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>K</b>arlheinz Stockhausen says that he first conceived of "Helicopter String Quartet" in a dream, and it's not long into the 32-minute piece that you're right there with him, hovering somewhere between fleeting vision and unimaginable reality. The composition, originally executed in 1995, recorded the members of the Arditti String Quartet playing inside four Royal Dutch Air Force Helicopters. The choppers, meanwhile, flew patterns charted in the composer's score. Both the helicopters and the string players were miked for sound, broadcasting in real time to a console on the ground where Stockhausen mixed them together.</p><p>That Stockhausen pulled off the project is, in the very least, staggering. (As is what it says about the supremely cool state of European arts funding.) But more shocking is how well the, uh, high concept pays off in purely musical terms. The piece certainly benefits from the novelty of its crazed ambition -- and the winsome image of baffled pilots staring at a color-coded flight chart/musical score -- but "Helicopter String Quartet" resonates even more for its peculiarly nimble pairing of man with machine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/stockhausen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/stockhausen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/27/vanguard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/27/vanguard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/01/27/vanguard</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three chords, 12 bars or just one note -- two Vanguard collections promise the essence of the blues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n its purest form, blues music is remarkably easy to play. Spend 10 minutes with a harmonica -- breathe out, breathe in, add a touch of drama to that last waning gasp for air -- and you can at least keep up appearances. Learn the right three elementary guitar chords and you've shuffle-stepped toward the Delta. Throw some whiskey into the mix, maybe a tambourine and the form all but plays itself.</p><p>Of course, none of the above is true. Or rather it is, in a sense, but expert musicians and casual listeners alike will tell you that what comes out of the blues form is altogether different than what goes down on paper. Musicologists talk about "blue" notes and diminished chord structures in tracing the music's evolution, but they're also the first to point out that blues announces itself as blues on its own terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/27/vanguard/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/27/vanguard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/juvenile_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/juvenile_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/2000/01/19/juvenile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Juvenile&#039;s rhymes are near idiotic, but the production -- that&#039;s another story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>D</b>rawling their way out of New Orleans with gaudy flash and a ghetto-dandy lean, the players in the Cash Money crew stormed hip-hop by giving bad taste a good name. Or by giving good taste a bad name. The rappers rhyme about eating Popeye's fried chicken and keepin' it real while spinning tales about shopping for Jaguars and lubricating their rubbers with Cristal. Both sides -- the profanely sacred and the sacredly profane -- speak for the work of the label's house producer and genius-in-residence Mannie Fresh, who harvests a stunning take on hip-hop futurism from a minefield of such dubious musical styles as Miami booty bass, discount-bin techno and heartless hip-hop candy grams.</p><p>In the hip-hop world, where beat-writing producers share star status with rappers, Fresh is the foundation of the Cash Money franchise. Harking back to the days when a central figure presided over the proprietary sounds created by in-house record label teams (Booker T. & the MG's at Stax, Willie Mitchell at Hi, Berry Gordy at Motown, to name a few), Fresh's good-time mix of Southern electro bounce has given Cash Money a string of chart hits and a bank account to back up the name.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/juvenile_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/19/juvenile_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/02/ssab/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/02/ssab/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/1999/12/02/ssab</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Semiotics and narcotics guide filmmaker Harmony Korine&#039;s debut record.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>t a book reading last year in New York, filmmaker <a href="/people/feature/1999/10/16/harmonint/index.html">Harmony Korine</a> sat behind a tiny tape player, pumping his fists to the Cranberries hit "Salvation." He simply pressed "play" and sat there, dressed in a robe and straw hat before a head-scratching audience at Barnes & Noble, until the song's last note. It was an absurdist exercise, borrowing context's power to twist otherwise familiar notions beyond recognition. At the same time, it was just a gloomily nihilistic stunt, provoking an audience with a heavy dose of childish motives and aimless antics.</p><p>This is the main knock on Korine as a filmmaker. While his supporters see tailor's marks behind his tattered on-screen images, his <a href="/ent/log/1999/10/01/harmony/index.html">detractors</a> argue that they're nothing but empty gestures. As for Korine himself, he says his visions are the result of putting different elements in place and, like a chemist, making sense of their explosions after the fact.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/02/ssab/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/02/ssab/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/foo_fighters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/foo_fighters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/1999/11/04/foo_fighters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Nirvana, unrepentant Foo Fighter Dave Grohl settles down for mediocrity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here's something resolutely strange but satisfying in hearing Dave Grohl turn into Jackson Browne. As the drummer of Nirvana, Grohl once found himself at the epicenter of what turned out to be a doozy of a youthquake. There he stood, one of the three punk rock faithful ultimately shaken down by a conflicted fascination with the tectonic maneuvering beneath their feet. In pictures of the band, though, Grohl never seemed overly torn. He was always the one who looked at least somewhat happy just to be there. And in the end, he was the only one of the three to escape with music eager to reconcile the cultural terms Nirvana helped redefine.</p><p>Save for a few raucous numbers on the Foo Fighters' "There Is Nothing Left to Lose," Grohl has grown out of his punk past and moved closer to the realm of the singer-songwriter. Armed now with a guitar and lead vocal duties, he's staking claim to a more casual presence. Though the dated sound that marks Nirvana's rock residency today speaks more to the almost terrifying rapidity of pop culture's powers of assimilation than to the band's original noise, it certainly has been aided by the band's sudden and tragic disappearance.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/foo_fighters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/04/foo_fighters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; Flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/llamas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/llamas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/1999/11/03/llamas_2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why the High Llamas are more than just another workingman's Beach Boys.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>ew bands approach the conventions of song with as much reverence and faithful earnestness as the High Llamas. Their eight-year search for the divine chord progression has always rung with a certain air of nobility, summoning the courtly manner of majestic madrigals, the more baroque outings of <a href="/music/sharps/1997/11/12sharps.html">Brian Wilson</a> and even George Gershwin.</p><p>For the High Llamas, music is a gilded artifact to be venerated for its most elemental qualities -- harmony and melody. These are self-evident means to a musical end, but in the hands of such deliberate artisans, harmony and melody serve more as finishing tools than hammers and nails. If <a href="/bc/1998/11/cov_10bc.html">Phil Spector</a> was building from the ground a wall of sound, the High Llamas are hard at work fashioning its decorative molding.</p><p>"Snowbug" shows the Llamas servicing much the same style they've plied since their beginnings in 1991. But whether by sheer force of time or some tick of measurable progress, it has become harder to cast off the group as just placeholders in the long line of Beach Boys fetishists. (The band's mastermind, Sean O'Hagan, was once approached to work with Brian Wilson on a since-aborted project.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/llamas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/03/llamas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/21/woodstock_cd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/21/woodstock_cd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taking Woodstock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/1999/10/21/woodstock_cd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Let me stand next to your fire" and other joyful idiocies prop up two CDs&#039; worth of Woodstock 99 live cuts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t's hard to imagine a music festival ending in anything but a fiery riot when its postprandial two-CD companion set begins with Korn and ends with Bruce Hornsby. There's one group summoning a thousands-strong sing-along to the less than affirming words, <i>"What if I should die!?"</i> And then there's a curly-haired square best known for his musical invitation to "listen to the mandolin rain." Forget about Limp Bizkit singer Fred Durst's needling fans at <a href="/ent/music/feature/1999/07/27/woodstock/index.html">Woodstock 99</a> to "smash stuff"; the presence of the offensively bland Bruce Hornsby is probably as much to blame for the festival's incendiary send-off. Though the "Woodstock 99" collection's opening and closing tracks don't coordinate with the festival's schedule, they serve as bookend reminders that certain things are to be expected when hydrogen mingles with an open flame.</p><p>A bold line separates the two disks of "Woodstock 99." Maybe with a cheeky nod to the Beatles' hits collections, they are referred to as the "Red Album" (for our purposes, the flame) and the "Blue Album" (as suitable a color for hydrogen as any). As postcards from the land of ceaseless sweat and $4 water, they deliver disparate messages: One says something along the lines of "Fuck you! And you, too!"; the other, "Honey, I've met some of the most interesting people here."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/21/woodstock_cd/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/21/woodstock_cd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Family pictures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/korine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/korine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/log/1999/09/28/korine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Gummo" moviemaker Harmony Korine is not independent film&#039;s bastard child after all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes mothers can be <i>so</i> embarrassing. Even for Harmony Korine, the young filmmaker notorious for reveling in images of underage sex, cat-killing and bacon taped to bathroom walls in films like "Kids," which he wrote and "Gummo," his directorial debut.</p><p>This weekend, at a Q&A session at downtown Manhattan's Anthology Film Archives, Korine's mother raised her hand with a question for the speaker -- Harmony's father Sol. "I just want to know how you think your work influenced Harmony," she asked. A charmingly humble Sol Korine laughed. "Oh, I don't want to talk about that," he said. Harmony, seated in a row up front, turned to his mother in melodramatic sheer horror. His red-faced look and rolling eyes said something along the lines of "Maaa-om!" It was a tender moment.</p><p>And a surprising one, taking into account Harmony's reputation as anything but bashful. Asked to curate a series of films by an art house expecting the works of Werner Herzog, Rainer Werner Fassbinder and Jean-Luc Godard, Harmony Korine used the opportunity to come clean about his family by showing the films that his father made.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/korine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/28/korine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chemistry set</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/chemical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/chemical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/log/1999/09/22/chemical</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Singing along to electronica with the Chemical Brothers and Paul Oakenfold live in New York.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Y</b>ou know a cultural movement is moving along at a steady clip when the hot dog vendors catch on. And there they were, camped outside New York's Hammerstein Ballroom hawking franks and pretzels and bottled water to folks anxious to see the Chemical Brothers take Manhattan. Along with the vendors came the scalpers, the same scalpers who dole out tickets to Knicks games at the Garden, just a one-block jump shot down the street. And then the promoters, shilling flyers. And the fashion plates, like the guy defiantly wearing a seersucker suit past Labor Day, Gheri-curls spilling out from underneath his fedora.</p><p>The circus happening just outside the circus gearing up inside made one thing perfectly clear: For all its progress in methodically creating a new cultural language, electronica still knows how to stage a good old-fashioned spectacle. This was reassuring throughout the course of the night, because while the music's language can be fascinating to hear, it resonates with little more than a markedly unsubtle command to "Dance! Dance! Dance!" when spread out over more than four hours of opening and headlining acts. Selectively whittled down to snippets, though, it made for some interesting conversation. Like that carried on by two young teenagers bounding into the theater during DJ Paul Oakenfold's opening set. The boy, his head all but completely swallowed up by his oversized hood, heard a sound drifting through the doorway and turned toward his girlfriend. "No shit!" he said, before curling his mouth. "Diiiiuurrrrrr, niiuuuurrr, ruuuiir," he muttered, presumably "singing" along with what seemed to be his favorite song. Maybe even "their" song. He put his arm around her shoulders. Her eyes lit up. She smiled. They'd just had one of those moments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/chemical/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/22/chemical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sharps &amp; flats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/sukpatch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/sukpatch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/review/1999/09/13/sukpatch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Low-fi electronic indie duo Sukpatch release the fall&#039;s best summer record.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>s a post-indie rock outfit borrowing sheepishly from electronic music's aesthetic cues, Sukpatch occupy an interesting space. Through a bit of cultural gerrymandering, the group's members translate a certain switched-on sound to an audience that reacts with suspicious minds to the endlessly debatable theory that the guitar and 4-track have gone the way of the guitar and 4-track. For musical culture movers molded more by Pavement's rock than by Derrick May's techno, Sukpatch make good electronic music. For electronic music fans whose sense of earthiness goes only as far as Kraftwerk, Sukpatch make good indie rock.</p><p>From either direction, Sukpatch's "Tie Down That Shiny Wave" -- the band's first for the Beastie Boys' Grand Royal label -- is a boundless pleasure thanks to its allegiance to both camps. Breezy as only an 18-minute EP can be, it may be this fall's best summer record.</p><p>Tape-loop and beat literate, Chris Heidman and Steve Cruze know their way around trip-hop's lethargic come-hither nature. But their sounds have a kitchen sink-type charm that recasts that style's darkly suggestive pull as a playfully innocuous tug. Sukpatch is more concerned with pop music's ephemeral levity than with electronic music's tendency toward purposeful precision.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/sukpatch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/13/sukpatch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

