<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Anick Jesdanun</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/anick_jesdanun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Media companies reap benefits of higher network fees</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/media_companies_reap_benefits_of_higher_network_fees_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/media_companies_reap_benefits_of_higher_network_fees_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Warner Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viacom Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast Corp.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comedy central]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TBS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time Warner Inc., Viacom Inc. and Comcast Corp. all saw growth in their cable network businesses this quarter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) -- Media companies benefited from higher fees for cable television networks such as TBS, Comedy Central and CNBC in the first three months of the year.</p><p>Time Warner Inc., Viacom Inc. and Comcast Corp. all saw growth in their cable network businesses, thanks to distribution fees they charge cable and satellite TV service providers for rights to carry their channels on subscribers' lineups. Those fees get passed on to customers of cable and satellite service.</p><p>The boost in television helped make up for weakness at two of the three movie studios that reported results Wednesday.</p><p>The trends show how important such fees have become to the television industry. Revenue at Time Warner's television business grew, even with a decrease in ad revenue. Even broadcast networks such as CBS are increasingly relying on distribution fees to ride out fluctuations in the ad market.</p><p>The fees have become so vital that broadcasters are worried about the threat posed by a Barry Diller-backed startup called Aereo. The company sends over-the-air broadcasts over the Internet and bypasses traditional cable and satellite operators. Disputes over the fees have also led to high-profile blackouts of channels on cable and satellite lineups.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/media_companies_reap_benefits_of_higher_network_fees_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/media_companies_reap_benefits_of_higher_network_fees_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Google laptop is impressive, but may disappoint some</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/review_google_laptop_impressive_but_not_for_all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/review_google_laptop_impressive_but_not_for_all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thailand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambodia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Word]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/review_google_laptop_impressive_but_not_for_all/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pixel isn't very practical — at least not yet — for most people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SIEM REAP, Cambodia (AP) — Google's first high-end laptop, the Chromebook Pixel, is an impressive machine. It feels light and comfortable in my hands and on my lap. Its high-resolution display makes photos look sharp and video come to life. From a hardware standpoint, it's everything I'd want a laptop to be.</p><p>But the Pixel isn't very practical — at least not yet — for most people. It works well when you have a steady Internet connection, but can't do much once you lose that connection. And because it uses Google's own operating system, it doesn't run enough software yet to replace your other machines.</p><p>I brought the Pixel along for a nearly three-week trip to Thailand and Cambodia, where I knew I wouldn't have the type of round-the-clock access I'm used to in the U.S. I was surprised by how much I could do, but quickly got frustrated when I couldn't do more.</p><p>Such frustration doesn't come cheap. Prices for the Pixel start at $1,299, just $200 less than a MacBook with a comparable screen and the ability to do much more offline. A higher-end Pixel with cellular access costs $150 more than the basic model and is scheduled to start shipping Monday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/review_google_laptop_impressive_but_not_for_all/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/review_google_laptop_impressive_but_not_for_all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Facebook grows, millions say, &#8216;no, thanks&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the resisters -- people who, unbelievably, don't want or need Facebook]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Don't try to friend MaLi Arwood on Facebook. You won't find her there.</p><p>You won't find Thomas Chin, either. Or Kariann Goldschmitt. Or Jake Edelstein.</p><p>More than 900 million people worldwide check their Facebook accounts at least once a month, but millions more are Facebook holdouts.</p><p>They say they don't want Facebook. They insist they don't need Facebook. They say they're living life just fine without the long-forgotten acquaintances that the world's largest social network sometimes resurrects.</p><p>They are the resisters.</p><p>"I'm absolutely in touch with everyone in my life that I want to be in touch with," Arwood says. "I don't need to share triviality with someone that I might have known for six months 12 years ago."</p><p>Even without people like Arwood, Facebook is one of the biggest business success stories in history. The site had 1 million users by the end of 2004, the year Mark Zuckerberg started it in his Harvard dorm room. Two years later, it had 12 million. Facebook had 500 million by summer 2010 and 901 million as of March 31, according to the company.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/as_facebook_grows_millions_say_no_thanks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>