<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Anna Blundy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/anna_blundy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 11:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Technology should make us optimistic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/five_great_books_on_technology_and_optimism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/five_great_books_on_technology_and_optimism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optimism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13181844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author Matt Ridley's favorite books on technologies that make the world a better place]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Before we start talking about the books tell me why you’ve chosen this topic.</strong></p><p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a>Because it’s my new passion. Because I spent my youth being a pessimist about the future of the world, but then it dawned on me that things were getting better and all my friends were getting richer and I didn’t need to be a pessimist. And that all sorts of trends were going in the right direction and it was all basically down to technology in the end, and I wanted to understand what this process was that was creating technologies that raised living standards.</p><p><strong>I wish I was one of your friends.</strong></p><p>Well, I’m talking about the 1980s. We all sat around in the 1970s as students, saying: We’re finished, it’s all over, the world’s going to come to an end, economic growth is a vile, idiotic and futile plan. I thought they meant it but it turned out that what they meant was: I’ve just applied to Goldman Sachs for a job.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/five_great_books_on_technology_and_optimism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/five_great_books_on_technology_and_optimism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PJ O’Rourke: We live in an age of &#8220;1984&#8243;-lite</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/pj_o%e2%80%99rourke_we_live_in_an_age_of_1984_lite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/pj_o%e2%80%99rourke_we_live_in_an_age_of_1984_lite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PJ O'rourke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The writer examines the five satires that have most influenced the way he sees the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Let’s hear the top five. <em>Gulliver’s Travels</em>.</strong></p><div> <div> <div> <p>Well, in the first place it is very funny. We read it first as kids as an adventure story, without understanding the political context in Europe or the philosophical context. Then when we read it again as adults we realise that Swift is having a good deal of fun here. Just the religious allegory with the Big-enders and the Little-enders and the idea of people who live for ever. And don’t they just turn out to be the kind of people who live for ever today? They show every sign of Alzheimer’s.</p> <p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a></p> <p><strong>When did you first read it?</strong></p> <p>I was about 14, I think. It was a little bit of a slog, but such a good story that I pushed forward with it. Swift’s take on human nature is evergreen. Whether people would use horses any more [as the perfection of nature], I don’t know. I don’t suppose we’re as familiar with them as Swift was; we’d use dogs or cats. No, not cats. There’s something a little wicked about cats.</p> </div> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/pj_o%e2%80%99rourke_we_live_in_an_age_of_1984_lite/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/pj_o%e2%80%99rourke_we_live_in_an_age_of_1984_lite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relationship advice: Forget Venus and Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/relationship_advice_forget_venus_and_mars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/relationship_advice_forget_venus_and_mars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mira Kirshenbaum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12999236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A relationship guru explains that it's better to concentrate on the mismatched narratives in our relationships]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <div> <p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a> You asked me to tell you about the five best books on relationships. Well, that started me on quite a quest. There are certainly a lot of great books on relationships. In fact, you could easily argue that almost all great works of literature are about relationships. Where else would the conflict and drama come from? Sophocles’s <em>Antigone</em> is about Antigone’s relationships with her uncle and her sister and her dead brother. Homer’s <em>Odyssey </em>is about many relationships, but most of all it’s about Odysseus’s relationship with his wife Penelope, his yearning for her, strangely coupled with his delaying the journey home. And, when he does get home, we see how well-matched she is with him in both cunning and strength of character.</p> <p>You can see where this is headed. I could just as easily give you a list of the five best works of literature if all I wanted to do was tell you about the five best books on relationships.</p> <p>But, as I thought about it, I realised that none of these books, no matter how great, really explained relationships, how they really function, any more than the greatest paintings in the world explain human physiology. And so I realised that if I wanted to pick the five best books on relationships – from the point of view of how relationships work – I have to look elsewhere. I’d have to look at the foundational work of some thinkers who were responsible for one of the greatest revolutions in human understanding. This is a revolution so profound that even today most people either can’t grasp it or aren’t even aware of it. I know, that’s a pretty stunning statement, isn’t it? But, in fact, the average person’s understanding of relationships is about 100 years behind the time. The best couples therapists know about this revolution and use its discoveries all the time, but with too many couples therapists, their thinking lags far behind.</p> <p><strong>Quick! What is this revolution?</strong></p> <p>Well, let’s start with systems thinking. The first book I want to talk about is entitled <em>Systems Thinking</em> and it’s edited by a guy named F E Emery. This is where you’ll find one of the most influential essays of the past 50 years. It’s called ‘The Theory of Open Systems’ and it’s written by a guy named von Bertalanffy. There are a lot of equations in this article, so you might have an easier time reading another piece in this book by Katz and Kahn. The van Bertalanffy piece, which was written in 1950, not only changed people’s thinking about relationships but changed people’s thinking about the self. You see, previous thinking about relationships is dominated by our sense of personalities: mean people make bad things happen; nice people make good things happen. All of drama and literature is based on this idea. According to this old-fashioned thinking, when something really bad happens in a relationship it must be because someone has done something really bad.</p> <p><strong>Haven’t they?</strong></p> <p>No. From the systems point of view, things look very different. Systems thinking says that once you have two people who sort of fall into each other’s orbit, the relationship becomes a kind of third force. It takes on a life of its own. Certain initial properties, perhaps insignificant in themselves, can take on huge significance. Here’s a trivial example with important implications. Let’s say you and I set up housekeeping together. We decide we’re going to share the washing-up chores after every meal. Now let’s say that you’re just a little faster when it comes to washing dishes and you do just a little better job.</p> <p><strong>Or, I think I do.</strong></p> <p>Well, it’s quite possible that because of that little difference the responsibility for washing dishes every night will fall to you. After all, you’ll be itching to jump in when you see how comparatively slow I am and how I end up not doing as good a job as you.</p> <p>Of course, now that you’re doing the washing-up every night, that’s one extra chore for you. And that might make you just a little resentful. You might not blow up. You might just act ever so slightly cold and hostile. Maybe not even enough for me to notice consciously. But I will notice it, and I will respond. And then you’ll respond to my response, and then I’ll respond to your response. And we’re off and running in a self-maintaining cycle of anger and distance. And there you have it. Two nice normal people in a terrible mess not because they’re terrible people but because of the properties of systems.</p> <p>Now here’s the miracle. While this is very hard for two people to sort out on their own – which explains why we feel so stuck so often in our own relationships – it’s surprisingly easy for a good therapist who understands systems to sort this out, and you can do it without any blame.</p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/relationship_advice_forget_venus_and_mars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/relationship_advice_forget_venus_and_mars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
