<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Anthony York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/anthony_york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 00:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Propaganda or journalism?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/21/television_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/21/television_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2003 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/04/21/television</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress believes a U.S. government-run TV network can deliver independent news to an Arab audience -- and make them like us, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the morning of April 10, Iraqis who turned on Channel 3 may have gotten a surprise. Viewers of the station, whose broadcasters once called Americans "the sons of monkeys and pigs and people of fornication and vice," were now being greeted by a smiling President Bush, speaking to them in English with Arabic subtitles. </p><p> Controlling Iraq's airwaves was one of the first goals of occupying American forces. By the time they had taken control of Baghdad, the new home of Iraqi television and radio programming was an American C-130 aircraft known as Commando Solo, the source of five hours of daily television programming and American radio broadcasts transmitted across the country on five different frequencies. </p><p> The rush to get Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair on Iraqi airwaves underscores the important role media will play as efforts to rebuild Iraq get underway. Efforts to reprogram Iraqi television are part of a larger project of changing attitudes about America, both in Iraq and around the Arab world -- a project in which media will play a central role. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/21/television_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/21/television_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death of a dreamer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/21/corrie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/21/corrie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/03/21/corrie</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her green hometown, far from the squalid road in Gaza where she was crushed by an Israeli bulldozer, the young activist is remembered as an idealist who loved life. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Walking through Olympia, on the day American-led forces will begin their campaign against Saddam Hussein's Iraq, it is impossible not to feel the presence of Rachel Corrie. Hours before the first bombs fall on Baghdad, a small group of protesters braves the rain outside the state Capitol, with protesters holding signs that read "Peace for Rachel." On the campus of Evergreen College, from which the 23-year-old was scheduled to graduate this spring, the foyer outside the school library has been turned into a makeshift memorial. There are tables filled with burning candles, flowers, photographs of Corrie in a giant dove costume, articles both by her and about her death and dozens of white origami cranes -- a symbol of the peace that has slipped away. </p><p> But Corrie's death beneath the blade of an Israeli bulldozer as she tried to stop the Israeli military's demolition of a Palestinian home in the Gaza town of Rafah has left local activists here struggling to keep her memory alive as the nation prepares for war, and doing all they can to ensure that the Bush administration pushes Israel for a full investigation into her death. Wednesday, Corrie's parents, Cindy and Craig Corrie, flew to Washington to join Rep. Brian Baird, D-Wash., at a Capitol Hill press conference, where the parents called on the U.S. to reassess its support of Israel. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/21/corrie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/21/corrie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will rebel Republicans sink Bush tax plan?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/16/bush_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/16/bush_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/01/15/bush_plan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP senators aren't happy with the imperious White House, and some might take it out on the budget-busting tax cut.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the White House gears up to sell President Bush's $674 billion economic package to Congress and the American public, Republicans could turn out to be more trouble than Democrats in getting the plan enacted. </p><p> While the plan has been met with firm resistance from a majority of Democrats -- including moderates who supported Bush's 2001 tax cuts -- some of its loudest critics are moderate Republicans. Relations are unexpectedly frosty these days between Senate Republicans and the White House, with even conservatives complaining they've been left out of the loop on questions of Iraq, North Korea and the president's blockbuster tax-cut plan. </p><p> The president's economic proposal met bipartisan opposition in the Senate <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/01/09/bushtax/index.html">almost as soon as it was announced.</a> The story landed above the fold in Saturday's Washington Post, where even champions of the president's plan said it would have to be changed to pass; and the plan was met with GOP skepticism on many weekend talk shows, where the list of senators with reservations about the tax cuts continued to grow. By the time Senate Republicans reconvened Tuesday, many were openly calling for big changes to the president's plan. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/01/16/bush_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/16/bush_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican moderates balk at Bush tax cut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/10/bushtax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/10/bushtax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus, D-Mont.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary Landrieu, D-La.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/01/09/bushtax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Resistance from McCain, Snowe, Chafee and others could spell trouble for the president's radical proposal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> One day after President Bush proposed a $674 billion tax cut that would principally benefit the affluent, a corps of moderate Republicans delivered a curt response: In a time of imminent war and rising deficits, the tax cut is too big and will not pass without significant change. </p><p>The unusual public opposition from moderates in his own party and from centrist Democrats who supported his 2001 tax cut appeared to get the attention of the White House, and spokesman Ari Fleischer was already signaling Wednesday that Bush was ready to compromise. And while some analysts had suggested that Bush's first draft was designed mainly to score points with big GOP contributors, some past allies in the Senate said Bush had no choice but to back down. </p><p>Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, said she was pleased with some of the smaller-ticket items in the Bush plan, like the acceleration of the child-care tax credit and some targeted business cuts. But she balked at the $364 billion centerpiece of Bush's plan -- the elimination of the tax on corporate dividends -- citing the worrisome federal deficit. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/01/10/bushtax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/10/bushtax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bring back the draft?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/08/draft_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/08/draft_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2003 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/01/07/draft</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Charles Rangel says yes -- the poor, black and brown shouldn't be the only Americans fighting and dying in Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., will introduce a bill Tuesday that he admits has no chance of passing. But as the U.S. prepares for a war with Iraq, Rangel is introducing legislation to restart the military draft, in an effort to inject questions about race and class into the Iraq debate, and force Americans to think twice about rushing into war. </p><p> Class is at the heart of the debate over the Bush administration's domestic policy agenda. Democrats insist the president's economic plan benefits the wealthy at the expense of the poor, while Republicans accuse Democrats of fomenting Marxist class warfare with their arguments against the Bush tax cuts. But questions of race and class rarely come up in foreign policy debates -- though Rangel insists they're crucial, especially when looking at the all-volunteer military that will fight a war with Iraq. </p><p> Today's armed forces rely heavily on minorities, the working class and the poor, he says, who turn to the military because few other opportunities are available to them. Roughly 40 percent of the U.S. military is minority, compared to a quarter of the overall population. African-Americans are particularly likely to join: They make up 26 percent of the military, but only 12 percent of Americans. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/01/08/draft_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/08/draft_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confederates in the attic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/21/hines/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/21/hines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2002 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/12/20/hines</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the Lott debacle, President Bush faces questions about the way his campaign used the Confederate flag to win the South Carolina primary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott's hold on his job hanging by a thread, thanks to his praise for Strom Thurmond's segregationist 1948 presidential campaign, other Republicans, including President Bush, are drawing more scrutiny for their own ties to Southern segregationists and pro-Confederacy groups. </p><p> On Wednesday former President Bill Clinton accused GOP leaders of hypocrisy for calling on Lott to step aside and yet using <a href="/politics/feature/2002/11/12/confederate_flag/">race-baiting tactics</a> to win elections in the South. Clinton pointed to this year's Georgia governor's race, when Republican Sonny Perdue used the promise of a referendum on the Confederate flag as a device to rally rural white conservatives. The incumbent, Democrat Roy Barnes, had pushed to change the state flag, which prominently featured the Confederate flag. </p><p> The flag also played a key role in Bush's victory in the Republican primaries of 2000, becoming a pivotal issue in the fight between Bush and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. In the wake of the Lott debacle, Bush's maneuvers during one nasty primary are raising new questions. Coming under scrutiny is Bush's connection to Richard Hines, the former managing editor of Southern Partisan magazine, former state legislator and current Beltway lobbyist who helped Bush defeat McCain in South Carolina. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/21/hines/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/21/hines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lott: It gets worse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/14/lott_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/14/lott_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/12/13/lott</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troubling new disclosures about the Senate's top Republican and his record on race relations raise questions about his fitness for office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush rebuked incoming Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott Thursday for his racially divisive remarks last week, and disturbing new revelations about Lott's record on race relations and wavering support among fellow Republicans raised new questions about whether he could hold on to the most powerful post in Congress. </p><p> A new report published by Time Magazine online detailed Lott's efforts to block integration of his fraternity while he studied at the University of Mississippi. And in a 1984 interview that circulated widely Thursday, Lott expressed strong opposition to the national holiday that had been established to honor the Rev. Martin Luther King. </p><p> Based on those and earlier disclosures, a picture emerged of Lott as a 21st century Republican leader who was still fighting battles that his ideological allies had lost in 1865 and in the civil rights era of the mid-1900s. It was a picture that made even past allies profoundly uneasy. </p><p> Conservative commentator William Bennett, the self-styled arbiter of American moral decline, said Lott's comments last week at a birthday bash for Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., were "offensive, repugnant and inimical to what the Republican Party stands for." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/14/lott_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/14/lott_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A whole Lott of trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/13/lott_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/13/lott_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/12/12/lott</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Trent Lott apologized again for his racially insensitive remarks, but even some conservatives called for him to step aside as the next majority leader.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> After several days of near silence, some of the nation's top Democrats Wednesday demanded that Republican Trent Lott step aside as the Senate's incoming majority leader in waiting, saying that his remarks at Sen. Strom Thurmond's birthday celebration last week were so racially insensitive that he is unfit for the post. </p><p> Lott blitzed the airwaves, expanding and amplifying his earlier apology, and though he insisted that he would not step aside as majority leader, it was unclear whether he would survive the controversy. Several new revelations showed that Lott had made similar remarks in past years that seemed to be thinly veiled regrets that the days of racial segregation were over. Even some Republicans who had supported him earlier this week fell silent, a clear indication that the Mississippi senator is, at least for the moment, politically toxic. </p><p> "I wanted to honor Strom Thurmond, the man, who was turning 100 years old. He certainly has been a legend in the Senate both in terms of his service and the length of his service," Lott said on conservative Sean Hannity's syndicated radio show Wednesday. "It was certainly not intended to endorse his segregationist policies that he might have been advocating or was advocating 54 years ago. But obviously, I am sorry for my words, they were poorly chosen and insensitive and I regret the way it has been interpreted. This was a mistake of the head, not of the heart because I don't accept those policies of the past at all." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/13/lott_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/13/lott_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House economic policy: Confusion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/11/friedman_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/11/friedman_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/12/11/friedman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Friedman was set to be the next chair of Bush's National Economic Council. Then he wasn't. Then he was again. Clearly, the man has enemies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Stephen Friedman seemed a sure bet late last week to succeed Lawrence Lindsey as chairman of the Bush administration's National Economic Council. But then a funny thing happened: Bush critics began praising the appointment, and conservatives who looked more closely found out that Friedman wasn't necessarily one of them. </p><p> By Tuesday morning, word was out that Friedman was not among the true believers who want bigger and deeper tax cuts. His political star seemed to be in full -- and possibly permanent -- eclipse. By late afternoon, though, anonymous Bush administration sources leaked word that Friedman's nomination was back on track. </p><p> So goes the four-day political rise-and-fall-and-rise of the former Goldman Sachs chairman, who now indeed seems poised to become Bush's top economic advisor. And the rest of the world is left to wonder what, exactly, Bush is thinking. </p><p> When Friedman did not appear, as was first scheduled, at the announcement of John Snow as Treasury secretary Monday, it was clear that Friedman's selection to the post was in jeopardy. In Tuesday's Washington Post, an aide who earlier had put Friedman's chances at 95 percent had downgraded them to 75 percent. And at a Tuesday press briefing, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer had the sound of someone who was backing away from the White House Friedman leak, claiming that he had warned all along that Friedman's selection was not a done deal. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/11/friedman_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/11/friedman_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caught whistling Dixie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/10/lott_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/10/lott_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2002 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/12/10/lott</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four days later, Lott's controversial comment gets some attention. But not from top congressional Democrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott's big mistake came last Thursday, at a ceremony commemorating the 100th birthday of Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C. When it was his turn to speak, Lott boasted that his home state of Mississippi had supported Thurmond's run for president in 1948, and that "if the rest of the country had followed our lead we wouldn't have had all these problems over all these years." </p><p> Thurmond ran in 1948 as an openly pro-segregationist Dixiecrat. Lott's comment, according to the Washington Post, was met by "an audible gasp and general silence." </p><p> But perhaps even more surprising is how that stunned silence extended all the way to the Democratic Party. By Monday, many black leaders and black organizations had denounced Lott's remarks. On Monday, Lott said only that his comments "were not an endorsement of [Thurmond's] positions of more than 50 years ago, but of a man and his life." And four days later, few leading Democrats -- including those considering a bid for the 2004 race -- were willing to openly criticize the senator. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/10/lott_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/10/lott_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush shakes up economic team</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/07/o_neill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/07/o_neill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2002 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/12/07/o_neill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O'Neill and Lindsey are out. But critics of White House policy might not like what comes next.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For months, speculation has brewed over which members of Bush's economic team might be cut loose. The internal fight has been described as a clash of both personality and policy between Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and White House economic director Larry Lindsey. Friday, the speculation ended quickly: Both men resigned, at the administration's request. </p><p> The fight between Lindsey and O'Neill became very public in a <a target="new" href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/novak/cst-edt-novak14.html">column</a> written by Robert Novak last month. Novak, a Lindsey supporter, wrote that Lindsey had been "mercilessly battered and blamed in newspaper accounts for lack of a dynamic Bush economic policy." Novak blamed Glenn Hubbard, the chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, as the source of the anti-Lindsey attacks. "Friends of Lindsey are more than suspicious," Novak wrote. "They claim hard information that Hubbard, on leave as a Columbia University economics professor, has waged a disinformation campaign against his colleague." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/07/o_neill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/12/07/o_neill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kiss it goodbye</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/27/environment_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/27/environment_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/27/environment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With industry henchmen in complete control of Washington, the Clean Air Act, wilderness preserves and environmental enforcement are all endangered species.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When Environmental Protection Agency administrator Christie Whitman loosened clean-air rules for power plants and factories last week, it seemed like the first bold move of a White House newly empowered by its midterm election victory to reward its industry friends. In fact, Whitman had the power to make the change unilaterally, and she'd been moving to do so before the GOP took back the Senate -- and there was little the Democrat-controlled Senate could have done to stop her. </p><p> But the GOP takeover means there will be no Senate hearings to review the new policy, and Democrats who had planned to subpoena EPA documents related to Whitman's decision -- documents they believe would reveal the shoddy science as well as the influence of industry folks lobbying for the move -- are now powerless to do so. Thus Whitman's move is the symbolic opening of a new phase in the battle over the environment: Between an administration that no longer has to worry about Senate oversight when making the regulatory changes its business constituency demands, and an advocacy community that will now have only lawsuits as weapons to battle such changes. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/27/environment_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/27/environment_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gored!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/23/gore_81/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/23/gore_81/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/23/gore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new, improved Al Gore tells Salon he suspects demonizing Saddam was a Bush campaign ploy -- and explains why it took him so long to speak out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Al Gore begins taking heat from his political opponents, he has plenty of answering to do to his past supporters. Gore's reemergence on the national stage this month has brought enthusiastic crowds to book signings, but it has also unleashed some pent-up anger from formerly friendly quarters. </p><p> In a Nov. 4 article, the New Yorker's Hendrik Hertzberg criticized Gore for leaving the national stage after he conceded the presidency to George Bush. "He fell silent. He did not accept -- and apparently did not perceive -- the responsibility that his popular-vote victory had laid upon him," Hertzberg wrote. "At a crucial moment he essentially left voiceless those who had placed their trust in him." And <a target="new" href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20021007&s=editorial100702">The New Republic</a> opined that Gore's <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2002/09/24/gore/">speech</a> criticizing the administration's Iraq policy "consisted of neither honest criticism nor honest opposition. Rather, it sounded like a political broadside against a president who Gore no doubt feels occupies a post that he himself deserves." (The Iraq speech did signal something of a departure for Gore. In the Senate, Gore was one of the most hawkish of Democrats when it came to Saddam Hussein. And it was with Gore's support that the Clinton administration formally adopted the U.S. position of regime change in Iraq.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/23/gore_81/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/23/gore_81/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>That other Al</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/21/sharpton_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/21/sharpton_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Nov 2002 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/21/sharpton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rev. Al Sharpton explains why Condi Rice and Colin Powell are not "black leaders," and how his presidential bid can save the Democrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Al Sharpton knows he has baggage. He wants his bid for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2004 to evoke memories of Jesse Jackson's historic campaign 20 years earlier. But he's well aware that the only person his name will evoke in others is <a target="new" href="http://archive.salon.com/col/guest/1998/01/05guest.html">Tawana Brawley,</a> and every bit of race-baiting that ugly episode represented. </p><p> And he's done plenty to add to that baggage through the years. He is a ubiquitous presence in New York -- whenever there is an allegation of police brutality or racial discrimination, you can bet that Sharpton will be smack in the middle of it. But Sharpton also demands attention from mainstream politicians. Sharpton received one-third of the Democratic vote in the 1997 New York mayoral primary, and 2001 mayoral candidate Fernando Ferrer credits Sharpton's support as helping boost him into the runoff against Mark Green. When Hillary Clinton wanted to run for Senate, she set up a <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/07/09/sharpton/">meeting with Sharpton.</a> When Al Gore came to New York during his presidential campaign, a meeting with Sharpton was arranged. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/21/sharpton_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/21/sharpton_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And they&#8217;re off!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/15/democrats_41/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/15/democrats_41/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/15/democrats</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Edwards as good as he looks? Can Kerry find some charisma? Can Gore really start over? A guide to the Democratic race to face Bush in 2004.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party has three presidential wannabes with one big problem -- most voters couldn't pick them out of a lineup. While Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and John Edwards, D-N.C., and Vermont Gov. Howard Dean try to overcome the recognition problem, Al Gore is wrestling with his Al Gore problem. While Edwards, Kerry and Dean worry about what we'll remember, Al Gore desperately wants us to forget. </p><p>Friday night Gore kicks off a heavy media offensive, part of his efforts to re-create himself in time for 2004, with a prime-time interview with Barbara Walters and a late-night visit with David Letterman. But he'll be joined soon enough by a new crop of unknowns that are already earning their own early buzz. </p><p>There's Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, who's become the long-shot pick of former Labor Secretary Robert Reich. And in a sign of just how profound the party's identity crisis has become, former Colorado Sen. Gary Hart even stoked the fires of speculation about his political comeback last week, though it's likely that has more to do with a future Senate run than a third White House bid. On the far left, Rev. Al Sharpton and Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, are both said to be considering bids. And after being cast aside by Georgia voters, and her party, Rep. Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga., is said to be considering a run for president, perhaps on the Green Party ticket. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/15/democrats_41/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/15/democrats_41/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harold Ford crusades to save the Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/09/pelosi_ford/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/09/pelosi_ford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2002 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Ford Jr.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/09/pelosi_ford</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative young congressman is challenging Nancy Pelosi for House minority leader, but his attack on the popular liberal could backfire.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> With Democrats relegated to the sidelines of power by the GOP's midterm election triumph, the race to succeed Rep. Dick Gephardt, D-Mo., as House minority leader may be as much excitement as the party sees until its 2004 presidential contenders step forward. </p><p> Early Friday, it looked as though it wasn't going to be much of a race. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the current No. 2 in the House leadership, seemed poised for a promotion. Her chief rival, Rep. Martin Frost, D-Texas, conceded as much, dropping out of the race on Friday, and throwing his support behind her. </p><p> And then Rep. Harold Ford Jr., D-Tenn., called Don Imus. </p><p> In a 6 a.m. phone call, which Imus took live on his nationally syndicated radio program, Ford announced that he would challenge Pelosi for the top spot. The ambitious Ford is an anomaly in several ways: at 32 the youngest Democrat in Congress, he is also perhaps its most conservative black member, as attested by his membership in the conservative group the Blue Dogs. Ford was among those who appeared on the White House steps with President Bush to voice his support for the resolution authorizing force in Iraq. He is also the only member of Congress to make People Magazine's list of 50 sexiest people, in case it turns out beefcake is what the Democrats need to reverse their recent decline. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/09/pelosi_ford/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/09/pelosi_ford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will heads roll?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/07/democrats_40/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/07/democrats_40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2002 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/07/democrats</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gephardt will step down -- and analysts speculate about who else may be punished after the Democratic catastrophe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A day after Democrats suffered resounding congressional losses, one exasperated Democratic political consultant said he was going to put his displeasure into literary form. "I'm ready to write a book," said Democratic strategist Peter Fenn, whose proposed title would be: "Why Democrats Have No Balls." </p><p> That was the essence of much of the internal Democratic critique Wednesday, after their party suffered a convincing defeat that gave Republicans control of the Senate and widened their House majority. Democrats began the process of looking for whom to blame and why they lost, and in short order, came up with plenty of explanations and potential goats -- Al Gore, Richard Gephardt and Terry McAuliffe leading the list. </p><p> But late Wednesday, senior aides to Gephardt, the Missourian who has led the House Democrats as they've been outnumbered by Republicans for the last eight years, told the Associated Press Gephardt would not seek the top Democratic job again, and will likely focus on his 2004 presidential hopes. Democrats lost at least seven seats in a historic GOP victory, and Gephardt was feeling pressure to step aside. Among those who criticized Gephardt Wednesday was Rep. Harold Ford, D-Tenn., who likened him to a baseball manager. Though the players on the team may like him, Ford said, if the team keeps losing, management must be replaced. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/07/democrats_40/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/07/democrats_40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The big showdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/05/races/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/05/races/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2002 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/11/05/races</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the GOP take control of all three branches of government? Or will the Democrats embarrass the Bush machine? A guide to Tuesday's key electoral contests.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which of the midterm election races could keep us glued to our cable news Tuesday night? </p><p> Maybe none, if you're one of the more than 60 percent of all voters likely to sit the election out. But that doesn't mean the stakes -- or the chance for great late-night drama -- aren't high. Of the very few 435 House and 34 Senate races expected to be competitive, those that are have a lot riding on them -- conceivably, control of both the Senate and House. President Bush has been out campaigning hard for struggling candidates in the campaign's final days, as has the Democrats' leading light, Bill Clinton (and, yes, Al Gore has done some select stumping, as well). While Bush hopes to capitalize on his 60-plus approval rating, Democrats have tried a traditional get-out-the-vote campaign led by labor unions and are relying heavily on black voters in many key races. </p><p> If Republicans regain complete control of the Congress -- as they briefly did in 2000, before Sen. Jim Jeffords jumped ship to become an Independent -- look for Democrats to play up their expected gains in gubernatorial races across the country. Many of the states that fell under Republican rule during the midterm election of 1994 are wobbly -- thanks to the shaky economy. While some major states like New York and Texas will probably remain in Republican hands, others are still too close to predict. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/05/races/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/05/races/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liddy&#8217;s free ride?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/31/dole_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/31/dole_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/10/31/dole</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Dole hammers her Senate opponent for his ties to Wall Street. But she still won't answer questions about a political money scandal in her own past.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the North Carolina race for Jesse Helms' seat in the U.S. Senate, Erskine Bowles, the Democrat, has been frequently singled out for his ties to corporate America. The state Republican Party even attacked Bowles' wife, Crandall, for running a company that recently moved textile jobs to Mexico. </p><p>Oddly absent, though, has been any discussion of his opponent, Republican Elizabeth Dole, and her business investments that once led to investigations by the Office of Government Ethics, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Elections Commission and the House Small Business Committee. </p><p> Stories about Dole's business dealings first surfaced when her husband, Bob Dole, then a senator from Kansas, ran for president in 1988. At the time, much was made of the investments of her blind trust, which was managed by David Owen, Bob Dole's confidant for more than 20 years and his campaign finance chairman in 1988. Owen, the former lieutenant governor of Kansas, was eventually forced to resign from the campaign and spent six months in jail for unrelated tax fraud charges -- angrily claiming that he had been abandoned by the Doles for political expediency. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/10/31/dole_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/31/dole_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Florida follies?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/29/calls_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/29/calls_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/10/29/calls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jumpy Democratic officials worry that phony phone calls might be a dirty-tricks campaign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 15 percent of the Florida voters are expected to use absentee ballots this year. And just last week, Florida Democratic Party chairman Bob Poe and Palm Beach County executive director Lisa Ramsay said they received calls reminding them to get their absentee ballots in by Nov. 10. </p><p> The problem, of course, is that's five days after they are due. Immediately, Democrats in this scandal-weary state smelled a rat. </p><p> Poe says he grilled the caller when the call came to his cellphone on Friday. The caller claimed to be a campaign volunteer for Bill McBride, the Democratic candidate for governor. When Poe asked to speak to the caller's supervisor, Poe says the caller hung up on him. "I immediately went back to the campaign thinking we had somebody out there with a bad script or something," Poe said. "We went through everybody and determined that at the time we had no live calls going out. So that's when I started getting concerned that somebody was tampering with the election." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/10/29/calls_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/10/29/calls_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
