<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Ari Berman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/ari_berman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The 196 people who will choose our next president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/the_196_people_who_will_choose_our_next_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/the_196_people_who_will_choose_our_next_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12369931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billionaires like Adelson and Freiss are behind the vast majority of super PAC dollars. The rest of us don't count]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a time when it’s become a cliché to say that Occupy Wall Street has changed the nation’s political conversation -- drawing long overdue attention to the struggles of the 99 percent -- electoral politics and the 2012 presidential election have become almost exclusively defined by the 1 percent. Or, to be more precise, the <a href="http://www.demos.org/publication/auctioning-democracy-rise-super-pacs-and-2012-election">.0000063 percent</a>. Those are the 196 individual donors who have provided nearly 80 percent of the money raised by super PACs in 2011 by giving $100,000 or more each.</p><p>These political action committees, spawned by the Supreme Court’s 5-4 Citizens United <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/38032/citizens-unite-against-citizens-united">decision</a> in January 2010, can raise unlimited amounts of money from individuals, corporations or unions for the purpose of supporting or opposing a political candidate. In theory, super PACs are legally prohibited from coordinating directly with a candidate, though in practice they’re just a murkier extension of political campaigns, performing all the functions of a traditional campaign without any of the corresponding accountability.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/the_196_people_who_will_choose_our_next_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/the_196_people_who_will_choose_our_next_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
