<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Arthur Allen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/arthur_allen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:34:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar-nominated director: Human nature is miserable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/oscar_nominated_director_human_nature_is_miserable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/oscar_nominated_director_human_nature_is_miserable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12228711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agnieszka Holland, director of the Holocaust drama "In Darkness," says you can't ever expect people to do right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agnieszka Holland’s "In Darkness," an Oscar nominee for best foreign film, tells the story of a Polish thief and workingman who protects a group of Jews seeking refuge in the sewers of Lwow, Poland, during the Nazi occupation. Based on a true story that’s been told in two nonfiction books, the story examines the conscience of Leopold Socha (played by Robert Wickiewicz), a casual anti-Semite motivated by a mixture of greed, fear, anger and altruism.</p><p>Holland -- whose remarkably diverse career includes two earlier Holocaust themes ("Europa, Europa," "Bitter Harvest"), a Henry James novel ("Washington Square"), "The Secret Garden" and three episodes of David Simon’s "The Wire" --  first turned down the film because its principal backers demanded that the actors speak English. She wanted the languages to reproduce the polyglot Babel of Lwow, then a Polish city and now a center of Ukrainian nationalism.</p><p>We spoke with Holland last week, ahead of the Oscar nominations, in Washington, D.C., where "In Darkness" was screened at the U.S. Holocaust Museum.</p><p><strong>Many of us approach the Holocaust with a mixture of horror and wonder, it’s so inexplicable. Do you keep returning to it in film because it’s unsolvable, or because you’re trying to understand something about it?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/oscar_nominated_director_human_nature_is_miserable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/26/oscar_nominated_director_human_nature_is_miserable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Death by sneezing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/sars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/sars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/04/02/sars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the U.S. hunts for germ weapons in Iraq, world health officials scramble to stop a fatal mystery disease that spreads like the common cold.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since AIDS began its terrifying spread, scientists who track emerging infections have been warning about the potential for another global outbreak, something that might resemble the Great Influenza Pandemic of 1918, which ultimately killed 50 million people. The latest news of quarantines and deaths due to a highly contagious mystery virus -- from Hong Kong, China, and Vietnam, as well as Canada and the United States -- could be a frightening picture of the start of such a natural disaster. As the U.S. government hunts for germ weapons in Iraq, while urging American doctors to vaccinate 10 million people against the long-vanquished smallpox virus on the tiny chance that terrorists might get hold of it, U.S. public health officials have been working hard with their colleagues abroad to get a handle on severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS. </p><p>Nature, in all its whimsy, has thrown us a big, fat, ugly curve -- a virus with a harmless background that suddenly turned lethal. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/sars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/sars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buffalo soldiers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/28/buffalo_soldiers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/28/buffalo_soldiers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2002 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2002/03/28/buffalo_soldiers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When bison wander from Yellowstone National Park, they fall prey to Montana gunmen -- unless they're rescued by a motley band of eco-warriors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> They had driven two days and nights from Bloomington, Ind. They had studs in their tongues and rings in their noses, and after they trudged out into the woods to get a feel for the territory, they carved the letter A -- for anarchist -- in a circle, in a snowbank. They had come to Montana on a singular quest: to let the buffalo roam. </p><p>Now they stood, Emily and Tim and Piper and Lindsey, like hobbits at the gates of Mordor, on a snowy Forest Service access road across frozen Duck Creek from the bison trap on old man Koelzer's farm. Shivering in the 20-below-zero cold, clad in Salvation Army pea coats and plaid pants and Doc Martens, the youthful quartet were briefed on how to fight the power, which, in this case, meant getting ready to sit. To sit, to watch, and to videotape. </p><p>Over the past five years, more than 1,000 volunteers have come to an unheated backcountry cabin north of West Yellowstone to participate in a remarkable campaign of environmental activism. They have come to the coldest spot in the lower 48 states from places as far-flung as New Zealand and Israel and Germany to witness, and at times obstruct, the Montana Department of Livestock in its roundup and slaughter of buffalo that wander out of Yellowstone National Park. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/03/28/buffalo_soldiers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/03/28/buffalo_soldiers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to nature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/bioethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/bioethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2001 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stem cells]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/11/30/bioethics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bioethics czar's new right-hand man is passionately opposed to abortion, public schools, federal taxes and Democrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When President Bush last summer picked University of Chicago philosopher Leon Kass to head a new bioethics advisory council, murmurs of approval rose from the pundit class, which swoons for Kass' fashionably unfashionable moralism. </p><p>Most of the secular bioethicists struggling with the challenges of cutting-edge medicine and biology plod forward with pragmatic ideas about limiting harm from science. Kass, on the other hand, has always seemed less worried by the practical risks than by what technology is doing to our souls. Sensitive to the "wisdom of repugnance," he has opposed in-vitro fertilization, stem cell research and cloning, often citing a personal reverence for the mystery of life. And he has done so from his chair at Chicago's lofty Committee on Social Thought. </p><p>That's deep stuff for a panel charged with telling Bush how to think. The stuff got even deeper Friday, when the government unveiled the man selected to serve at Kass' side as executive director of the President's Council on Bioethics. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/bioethics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/30/bioethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The scramble for the smallpox vaccine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/12/smallpox_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/12/smallpox_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2001 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/11/12/smallpox</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barely 25 years after a public health crusade eradicated the disease, scientists are gearing up to defeat it again. But should everyone get vaccinated?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> For the first time in 30 years, young Americans are again baring their arms to be pricked with the 3-inch, two-pronged smallpox needle. The needle is dipped in a vial of liquid vaccine and the dose is trapped by capillary action between the tiny prongs, which are then gently pushed, 15 times, into the upper arm. </p><p> The new Americans, mostly university students, are taking part in a study this month to determine whether the 15 million existing U.S. vaccine doses can be stretched to make as many as 150 million. It's a gloomy experiment with an outdated vaccine. </p><p> "Who would ever have thought in our lifetime we'd be working on this again?" asks Dr. Carol Tacket, who heads the Baltimore wing of the trial at the University of Maryland's Center for Vaccine Development. "The conquest of smallpox was certainly the greatest achievement of public health. And to think that we're revisiting that so soon just gives this undertone of sadness to the whole undertaking." </p><p> Dr. Mary Guinan shares that sadness. In 1974, the freshly minted doctor headed off to Uttar Pradesh, India, to fight smallpox. "It was mind-blowing," she recalls. "You'd go to these unbelievable remote places in the mountains near Nepal. It was cold. There were no maps. There were no hotels, just mud huts. Smallpox was where civilization wasn't." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/12/smallpox_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/12/smallpox_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who should get the anthrax vaccine?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/03/vaccine_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/03/vaccine_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2001 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/11/02/vaccine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal panel debates making the controversial drug, now restricted to the military, available more widely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lonesome death of Kathy Nguyen, the Bronx hospital worker who succumbed to anthrax on Wednesday, has raised the pressure another notch on public health officials, who must decide soon whether mail handlers, cops, nurses and even the public at large should receive a controversial vaccine against anthrax. </p><p> Until this week, all confirmed anthrax cases had been traced to mailrooms or a handful of letters directed to celebrities or news media. The approach to managing the disease was to blanket potentially exposed individuals with antibiotics, while disinfecting their workplaces. </p><p> Authorities haven't ruled out a post office link to Nguyen, a 61-year-old Vietnamese immigrant who lived in the Bronx and worked in a Manhattan hospital. But her case, as well the mysterious, cutaneous-anthrax infection of a New Jersey woman, have raised fears that lethal doses of free-floating anthrax spores could threaten more Americans than previously thought possible, though the threat of mass infection still remains small. </p><p> "If, in fact, the postal paradigm is changing, it's a whole new ballgame," said Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the NIH's top infectious disease specialist. "Not only will it change where we look for anthrax, but also the kind of recommendations we'll be making for the public health." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/03/vaccine_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/03/vaccine_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Cipro we trust?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/anthrax_15/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/anthrax_15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2001 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/26/anthrax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A pre-Gulf War study showed that a combination treatment of antibiotics and vaccination is the best way to fight anthrax. So why is the government relying on one drug?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public health officials announced Thursday that all the mailed anthrax discovered so far comes from a single batch that is diabolically aerodynamic but blessedly susceptible to "all the antibiotics that we have," in the words of Maj. Gen. John Parker, commander of the Army's biowarfare defense labs. </p><p>Yet, despite Parker's comment, and the Centers for Disease Control's recommendation that doctors use either Cipro or doxycycline to treat suspected cases of anthrax, Cipro alone has been given to more than 10,000 people who might be infected with anthrax. And it is Cipro that the government has obsessed over, haggling with Bayer to buy 100 million pills at the cut-rate price of 95 cents each. </p><p>In normal circumstances, doctors wouldn't be routinely handing out a drug like Cipro. It belongs to a fairly new class of drugs that are expensive and broadly targeting, wiping out large varieties of bugs. They are also expensive and generally held in reserve for serious infections, to keep them from creating new drug-resistant strains of bacteria. </p><p>So why is Cipro the drug of choice for anthrax? To understand that you have to go back to 1989, when the military, anxious to protect soldiers heading off to fight Iraq's Saddam Hussein in the Gulf, asked Col. Art Friedlander, a top scientist in Parker's command, to find a good defense against anthrax. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/anthrax_15/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/26/anthrax_15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postal precautions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/anthrax_14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/anthrax_14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/10/24/anthrax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After two post office employees die from anthrax, Cipro is handed out to more than 2,000 D.C. mail workers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the coterie of national security wonks who have warned for years that the crumbling U.S. public health system makes an inviting stage for the dark arts of germ warfare, the scene at a closed hospital near the Capitol on Tuesday must have felt like grim vindication. </p><p> On a day when public health officials from Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson on down were promising to spend millions rejuvenating public health, 2,000 postal workers lined up at D.C. General Hospital to get an allotment of the antibiotics that might have saved their two murdered colleagues. </p><p> D.C. General, an enormous brick complex near RFK Stadium, was shut down in June after serving impoverished southeastern Washington, in one form or another, for 195 years. Although a skeletal emergency room remains open, vast wings of the hospital are closed, its windows cracked and broken like superannuated Moscow dormitories. On Tuesday, police shooed hordes of reporters away from the doors while Red Cross volunteers passed out crackers and soft drinks. </p><p> Many of the postal workers, who got 10 days' worth of Cipro, said their superiors had urged them not to talk to the press. Some worried about getting sick while others expressed confusion about why they were getting antibiotics without first being tested for anthrax. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/anthrax_14/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/24/anthrax_14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anthrax attack &#8212; or panic attack?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/13/anthrax_psychology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/13/anthrax_psychology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2001 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2001/10/13/anthrax_psychology</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As suspected bioterror incidents are reported from Oregon to New York, medical experts fear the nation is on the verge of a nervous breakdown.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of pediatrician Al Mehl's patients in Boulder, Color., today was a young boy with a chest cold. The illness was routine, but his mother's take on it was anything but. "Tell me it isn't anthrax," she begged Mehl. "Tell me it isn't anthrax." </p><p>Around the same time, a suspicious powder on the roadway led police to close the main highway through Lake Oswego, a wealthy suburb of Portland, Ore., for three hours. The powder turned out to be wheat flour, dropped to mark a path for a jogging club. </p><p>In suburban Washington, D.C., police and local news teams rushed to an Episcopalian church, scene of the following emergency: A secretary had felt a "tingling of the mouth" after opening a dusty envelope. </p><p>Are we a nation on the verge of a nervous breakdown? In the brutal shadow of 9/11, in the peculiar wake of the still-mysterious Florida and New York anthrax cases, powders are giving people jitters coast to coast. Health departments, clinics and emergency rooms are swamped with calls from the worried well; scores of buildings have been evacuated, and some employees quarantined, by fear of unknown powders. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/10/13/anthrax_psychology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/10/13/anthrax_psychology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Size doesn&#8217;t matter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/13/genome_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/13/genome_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2001 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/02/13/genome</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As scientists unveil the human genome findings, it turns out we have a lot fewer genes than we'd thought, and not many more than a fruit fly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If fate is truly written in our genes, it must be some cosmic scriptwriter's idea of a joke. Because our genetic code is awfully similar to that of the fruit fly. </p><p>In a Washington hotel room jammed with Nobel laureates and other brainiacs, two competing groups of researchers presented the 3 billion letters of the human genome to the public Monday with a whimper of surprise. Human genes, it turns out, are remarkably similar to those of lower life forms. Whatever it is that makes us unique is probably not solely in the code that DNA uses to instruct our cells to make proteins. </p><p>The biggest surprise of the rough analysis of the first sequencing of the human genome was the number of genes it contains. For years scientists had been predicting that human DNA would contain somewhere between 100,000 and 140,000 genes. It turns out we may have as few as 26,000 -- a genome about the size of a corn plant, with roughly a third more genes than the fruit fly. </p><p>When it comes to numbers of genes, size definitely does not matter. Not only that, but our genes look pretty similar, in structure, to most of the genes in fruit flies, roundworms and even brewer's yeast. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/13/genome_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/13/genome_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Thompson, Bush clash over human embryo research?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/29/embryo_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/29/embryo_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2000 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/12/29/embryo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HHS nominee supports it, but right-to-lifers want it stopped.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's well known that Wisconsin Gov. Tommy Thompson, whom President-elect <a href="/directory/topics/george_w_bush/">George W. Bush</a> named as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services on Friday, is opposed to <a href="/directory/topics/abortion/">abortion</a> -- a fact that led Planned Parenthood to <a href="/politics/feature/2000/12/21/abortion/index.html">announce its opposition to his confirmation.</a> Less well known, however, is that Thompson has strongly supported research into cells derived from human embryos -- research endorsed by <a href="/directory/topics/president_clinton/">President Clinton,</a> but denounced by many anti-abortion groups and cautiously opposed by Bush. The looming showdown over embryonic cell research reveals just how complicated abortion and abortion-related issues can become when they collide with scientific research. </p><p>Just as <a href="/directory/topics/president_bush/">President George Bush</a> banned federal funding for research using fetal tissue (a ban Clinton quickly overturned), so right-to-lifers expect Bush to quickly reverse Clinton's endorsement of embryonic stem cell research. Bush has "consistently opposed federal funding for research that requires embryos to be discarded or destroyed," says his spokesman, Scott McClellan. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/29/embryo_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/29/embryo_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warming to malaria</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/malaria_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/malaria_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/health/2000/12/15/malaria</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With fears mounting that global climate change may  cause the dreaded disease to spread, scientists turn their attention to vaccine research.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regina Rabinovich recently returned from her first trip to Africa as director of a $50 million campaign to create a vaccine against the planet's most insidious parasite. One night shortly thereafter, she woke up feverish at 2 a.m. in the Washington home she shares with her husband, a pediatrician, and three children. </p><p>"I was burning up," she recalls. "Naturally, with two doctors in the house we didn't have a thermometer, so I went to the E.R. I was 105." </p><p> The diagnosis was malaria -- the disease that had brought Rabinovich to Africa in the first place. She'd taken antimalarial pills before leaving on her tour of six villages along the Gambia River, but evidently that was not enough to prevent the mosquito-borne bug from colonizing in her bloodstream. </p><p> Rabinovich cycled through cascades of fever and shaking, burning and cold for a few days before returning home from the hospital. She had undergone her rite of passage as a malaria researcher with the Malaria Vaccine Initiative, created earlier this year by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/malaria_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/malaria_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A cure worse than the disease?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/27/anthrax_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/27/anthrax_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/10/27/anthrax</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fearing sickness and debilitation, startling numbers of American troops are refusing to take mandatory anthrax vaccinations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramona Savoie flew rocket launchers into Kuwait and tanks into Mogadishu, Somalia. She flew the enormous C-5 transport planes for the Air Force reserves when she wasn't flying passenger jets for American Airlines. She was tough, buff and patriotic. </p><p>But in July 1999 she was also a 44-year-old woman trying to get pregnant for the first time. And like so many middle-aged members of the military reserves, she wasn't wild about complying with an order to get six shots against anthrax, a deadly bacterium she doubted she'd ever have the misfortune to inhale. Savoie had heard that the shots, given over a two-month period, could have the type of side effects a pilot couldn't afford -- joint pain, vertigo, headaches. She worried they might interfere with her in vitro fertilization treatments -- or damage the child she hoped for. </p><p>And so, after 26 years in the Air Force and reserves, Maj. Savoie decided she was not going to get the shots. Her husband, Maj. James Hechtl, and more than half of the other 54 pilots in their reserve unit, the 301st Airlift Squadron at Travis Air Force Base in Northern California, avoided the shot as well, the couple says. Savoie was particularly outspoken in her opposition to the mandatory vaccine, attending hearings in Congress and talking to reporters. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/27/anthrax_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/27/anthrax_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gore or Bush? Who cares? Not environmentalists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/23/globalwarming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/23/globalwarming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/10/23/globalwarming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After eight dispiriting years of Clinton-Gore, frustrated green groups are targeting corporations instead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's the new millennium, the earth is burning up, you're a green-minded citizen and you're worried, because nobody -- not even <a href="/directory/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore</a> -- seems willing or able to do anything about it. But if you're concerned about how your presidential vote will affect the situation, you might try to think like John Passacantando, the new director of Greenpeace. </p><p>Passacantando doesn't care who becomes president because when it comes to the environment he doesn't think it will make much difference. His new strategy for Greenpeace is to bypass the political process altogether and target corporations instead. He wants to hit them where it hurts the most: brand identity. </p><p>"Corporations spend millions of dollars on their reputations in the market," says Passacantando, his feet propped on a picnic table during a Greenpeace retreat in the forested mountains of western Maryland. "They want to be considered sexy and attractive. And we're going to go after that identity." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/23/globalwarming/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/23/globalwarming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drug war politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/drug_wars_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/drug_wars_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2000 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/10/12/drug_wars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The presidential candidates have not widely touted their plans to deal with drug abuse. Is it because of their own suspect histories?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="/directory/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore</a> and <a href="/directory/topics/george_w_bush/">George W. Bush</a> have strenuously avoided discussing the $19 billion drug war for most of the presidential campaign -- a deafening silence compounded by the national media's peculiar inclination not to press the candidates on drug-related issues beyond their own alleged (Bush) and acknowledged (Gore) use of illicit substances. </p><p>So it was something of a landmark moment in the campaign when Bush finally broke his silence on the issue last Friday by taking a swipe at the Clinton administration's drug war policies. In a speech in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Bush deplored what he claimed was an increase in teenage drug use caused by Clinton and Gore "sending the wrong message" and "failing to show leadership." </p><p>Yet Bush's critique missed by a mile. It's true, as he stated, that teenage marijuana use climbed through most of the 1990s. But that trend occurred throughout the Western world, from lenient Switzerland to France, whose drug laws are nearly as tough as ours. Although Bush argued that the U.S. situation resulted from a "leadership gap," any half-serious examination of the topic makes W's claim appear dubious. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/drug_wars_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/drug_wars_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The drug war&#8217;s Tweedledee</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/nida/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/nida/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/10/10/nida</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does National Institute on Drug Abuse chief Alan Leshner push propaganda over science in his close coordination with drug czar Barry McCaffrey?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social gatherings can be a downer for <a target="new" href="http://www.nida.nih.gov/Leshnerpage.html">Alan Leshner,</a> the gruff, no-nonsense director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, one of the two dozen separate agencies that compose the National Institutes of Health. As soon as he arrives, he says, other guests admonish him about how to do his job. </p><p>"I am probably the only NIH institute director who goes to a cocktail party and the first 12 people who come up to me tell me how to fix the drug problem," Leshner said recently. "The director of the National Cancer Institute doesn't have that problem." </p><p>But Leshner, a key player in the Clinton administration's controversial <a href="/directory/topics/war_on_drugs/">war on drugs</a> who works closely with <a href="/health/feature/2000/08/30/czar/">drug czar Barry McCaffrey,</a> is not complaining. He has managed to survive, and even thrive, in his high-profile job since 1994 -- not an unusually long tenure for an NIH director, but a lifetime for most politically sensitive public policy positions in Washington. Under his stewardship, NIDA's budget, which is largely spent on research into substance abuse, has nearly doubled. And Leshner dismisses the notion that he is a shill for the administration's anti-drug policies. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/nida/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/10/nida/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bioethics comes of age</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/caplan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/caplan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/09/28/caplan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lawsuit blaming the nation's most prominent
 bioethicist for the death of an
 18-year-old prompts a reexamination of the field.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For years, Arthur Caplan has been the nation's best-known medical ethics dispenser. The extroverted director of the Bioethics Center at the University of Pennsylvania is the go-to guy for researchers, hospitals, businessmen and journalists looking for sound moral thinking or just a sound bite. </p><p>Last week, Caplan, 50, earned the dubious distinction of being the first prominent bioethicist to get sued for his advice. The father of Jesse Gelsinger, an 18-year-old from Arizona who died a year ago during experimental therapy for his inborn metabolic disorder, named Caplan in a lawsuit against several Penn doctors and two hospitals. </p><p>Some bioethicists worry that the lawsuit could stifle ethical debate. Many feel that it represents a coming of age of sorts for bioethics, an academic field that began in the 1960s and whose influence has exploded along with changes in medical technology. </p><p>"Over the past five to 10 years, people have begun to realize that bioethics is developing into a discipline. Maybe one of the signs of reaching that status is getting sued," says Gilbert Mailaender, a bioethics professor at Valparaiso University in Indiana. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/caplan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/28/caplan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The battle over bio-terror</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/12/bioterrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/12/bioterrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/09/12/bioterrorism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent report urges America to pour $13 billion into preventing disease-based warfare, but evidence suggests that our fears are misplaced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The killer struck in the final act, pumping bacteria into the air ducts of the <a target="new" href="http://www.denvercenter.org/">Denver Center for the Performing Arts,</a> where an unsuspecting audience sat in thralldom to Puccini. Three days later the opera lovers started to cough, retch and roll into the emergency rooms. A week later, 400 of them were dead, and the pneumonic plague was off on a rip-snorting ride across the country. </p><p>This didn't really happen. The killer was only a mannequin and the victims were actors, paid by the Department of Justice to participate in a three-day, $2 million exercise in May that tested the Mile High City's response to a bio-terrorist attack. </p><p>But federal policymakers, from <a href="/directory/topics/president_clinton/index.html">President Clinton</a> on down, seem to believe it could happen. The government is spending $10 billion this year on the assumption that a night at the opera is the perfect postmodern battlefield, and the tender little underbelly of Anytown, USA., lies exposed to the claws of terror. An attack with unconventional weapons in the United States is likely, Clinton said after announcing the bio-terrorism initiative in 1998. "It's a cause for serious, disciplined, long-term concern." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/12/bioterrorism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/12/bioterrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portrait of a drug czar</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/30/czar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/30/czar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2000 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/08/30/czar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gen. Barry McCaffrey drives his government office like a lockstep battalion, but some contend his ruthless schedule and egomaniacal ways are only hurting his effort to bring sanity to America's drug policy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was 10 p.m. on a Friday that had started at 6 a.m. and drug czar Barry McCaffrey, two aides, two federal marshals and a D.C. cop were hurrying through Washington's National Airport to a lounge where McCaffrey could sit comfortably for a radio interview. As they swung around security to enter the lounge, rent-a-cops ordered McCaffrey's assistant, who was carrying the drug czar's briefing materials as well as his own bag, to go back through the metal detectors. At precisely that moment, "McCaffrey looks up," recalled one person present at the scene, "and says, 'Hey, how about some coffee?'" </p><p>As it turned out, McCaffrey may not even have been addressing the assistant with his request, but the many 70-hour weeks the assistant had put in at the drug czar's side had taken their toll. The assistant snapped. He dropped McCaffrey's bag, went back through security, down the escalator and caught a cab home. The following Monday, he told McCaffrey he wanted out. </p><p>Barry McCaffrey is the country's most-decorated general, its longest-serving drug czar and, now, an architect of a U.S.-backed counterinsurgency campaign that on Wednesday took him and President Clinton to Colombia. He's also a fiercely meticulous employer who has always taken it hard when subordinates leave his service. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/30/czar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/30/czar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Handicapped</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/24/hand_transplant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/24/hand_transplant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/health/feature/2000/08/24/hand_transplant</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are we hearing about a successful hand transplant two years after the fact? Maybe because the field's first poster child turned out to be a criminal who couldn't afford his meds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years ago, a New Zealand businessman made medical history when physicians in Lyon, France, replaced his amputated right hand and forearm with replacements salvaged from the corpse of a Frenchman whose brain had just been crushed in a motorcycle crash. The successful operation on Clint Hallam, 48, was a coup for the French-led team. They beat out University of Louisville transplant specialists who had been promised by Hallam that they could operate on him. </p><p>But if the French team seemed to have gotten the jump in the research race, the Americans have gotten the lead back. </p><p>This week, the New England Journal of Medicine announced the successful results of a similar operation on Matthew Scott, the 38-year-old New Jersey paramedic whom the University of Louisville team operated on four months after the Hallam operation. They reported that Scott can now write and turn the pages of a newspaper, tie his shoes and pick up his two sons. In the subsequent media fanfare, a thoughtful Scott appeared on ABC's "Good Morning America" on Friday talking about how he'd resigned himself to a life of disability since age 24 when he had a stupid accident with a firecracker. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/24/hand_transplant/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/24/hand_transplant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
