<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bill McKibben</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/bill_mckibben/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 10:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming hits home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a year of freakish and destructive weather, Americans are finally waking up to the dangers of climate change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Williams River was so languid and lovely last Saturday morning that it was almost impossible to imagine the violence with which it must have been running on August 28, 2011. And yet the evidence was all around: sand piled high on its banks, trees still scattered as if by a giant’s fist, and most obvious of all, a utilitarian temporary bridge where for 140 years a graceful covered bridge had spanned the water.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEs8ubAw7a8&amp;feature=related">YouTube video</a> of that bridge crashing into the raging river was Vermont’s iconic image from its worst disaster in memory, the record flooding that followed Hurricane Irene’s rampage through the state in August 2011.  It claimed dozens of lives, as it cut more than a billion-dollar swath of destruction across the eastern United States.</p><p>I watched it on TV in Washington just after emerging from jail, having been <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175435/bill_mckibben_arrested_at_the_white_house">arrested at the White House</a> during mass protests of the Keystone XL pipeline. Since Vermont’s my home, it took the theoretical -- the ever more turbulent, erratic and dangerous weather that the tar sands pipeline from Canada would help ensure -- and made it all too concrete. It shook me bad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/global_warming_hits_home_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>196</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rules that should govern energy subsidies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_rules_that_should_govern_energy_subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_rules_that_should_govern_energy_subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12803571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxpayer dollars shouldn't be propping wealthy fossil-fuel companies whose products we want less of]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along with “fivedollaragallongas,” the energy watchword for the next few months is: “subsidies.” Last week, for instance, New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez <a href="http://menendez.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/?id=9d10e72a-accb-40b2-b61b-c7d11833c8ba">proposed</a> ending some of the billions of dollars in handouts enjoyed by the fossil-fuel industry with a “Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act.” It was, in truth, nothing to write home about -- a curiously skimpy bill that only targeted oil companies, and just the five richest of them at that. Left out were coal and natural gas, and you won’t be surprised to learn that even then it <a href="http://www.app.com/article/20120329/NJNEWS10/303290097/Menendez-bill-to-halt-big-oil-tax-breaks-fails">didn’t pass</a>.</p><p>Still, President Obama is now <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/green/2012/03/29/454666/obama-goes-on-offense-against-oil-companies-accuses-them-of-gouging-taxpayers-for-profits/">calling for</a> an end to oil subsidies at every stop on his early presidential-campaign-plus-fundraising blitz -- even at those stops where he’s also promising to “drill everywhere.” And later this month Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/27/1058706/-Bernie-Sanders-proposes-to-ax-fossil-fuel-subsidies-and-add-10-million-sun-powered-rooftops">will introduce</a> a much more comprehensive bill that tackles all fossil fuels and their purveyors (and has no chance whatsoever of passing this Congress).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_rules_that_should_govern_energy_subsidies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/05/the_rules_that_should_govern_energy_subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change denial&#8217;s new offensive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12312881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global warming is wreaking devastation, but Big Oil won't give up profits without a planet-destroying fight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we could see the world with a particularly illuminating set of spectacles, one of its most prominent features at the moment would be a giant carbon bubble, whose bursting someday will make the housing bubble of 2007 look like a lark. As yet -- as we shall see -- it’s unfortunately largely invisible to us.</p><p>In compensation, though, we have some truly beautiful images made possible by new technology. Last month, for instance, NASA updated the most iconic photograph in our civilization’s gallery: “Blue Marble,” originally taken from Apollo 17 in 1972. The spectacular new <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/gsfc/6760135001/in/photostream">high-def image</a> shows a picture of the Americas on January 4th, a good day for snapping photos because there weren’t many clouds.</p><p>It was also a good day because of the striking way it could demonstrate to us just how much the planet has changed in 40 years. As Jeff Masters, the web’s <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/show.html">most widely read</a> meteorologist, <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/article.html?entrynum=2021">explains</a>, “The U.S. and Canada are virtually snow-free and cloud-free, which is extremely rare for a January day. The lack of snow in the mountains of the Western U.S. is particularly unusual. I doubt one could find a January day this cloud-free with so little snow on the ground throughout the entire satellite record, going back to the early 1960s.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/07/climate_change_denials_new_offensive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>154</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The political power of being naive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/the_political_power_of_being_naive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/the_political_power_of_being_naive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11910951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cynicism makes us complacent. 2011's successful protests show how hope can change the system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My resolution for 2012 is to be naive -- dangerously naive.</p><p>I’m aware that the usual recipe for political effectiveness is just the opposite: to be cynical, calculating, an insider. But if you think, as I do, that we need deep change in this country, then cynicism is a sucker’s bet. Try as hard as you can, you’re never going to be as cynical as the corporations and the harem of politicians they pay for.  It’s like trying to outchant a Buddhist monastery.</p><p>Here’s my case in point, one of a thousand stories people working for social change could tell: All last fall, most of the environmental movement, including <a href="http://www.350.org/">350.org</a>, the group I helped found, waged a fight against the planned Keystone XL pipeline that would bring some of the dirtiest energy on the planet from Canada through the U.S. to the Gulf Coast. We waged our struggle against building it out in the open, presenting scientific argument, holding demonstrations and attending hearings.  We sent 1,253 people <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/archive/175435/bill_mckibben_arrested_at_the_white-house">to jail</a><strong> </strong>in the largest civil disobedience action in a generation.  Meanwhile, more than half a million Americans offered public comments against the pipeline, the most on any energy project in the nation’s history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/the_political_power_of_being_naive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/the_political_power_of_being_naive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has global warming become a campaign issue?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10222016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why blocking the Keystone pipeline could help Obama and denying climate change will hurt Romney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conventional wisdom has it that the next election will be fought exclusively on the topic of jobs. But President Obama’s <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/11/10/BUG71LTBLR.DTL">announcement</a> last week that he would postpone a decision on the Keystone XL pipeline until after the 2012 election, which may <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/change-pipeline-plan-could-present-problems-215701253.html">effectively kill</a> the project, makes it clear that other issues will weigh in -- and that, oddly enough, one of them might even be climate change.</p><p>The pipeline decision was a true upset. Everyone -- and I mean everyone who "knew" how these things work -- seemed certain that the president would approve it. The National Journal <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/energy/insiders-obama-will-approve-keystone-xl-pipeline-this-year-20111011?page=1">runs a weekly poll</a> of “energy insiders” -- that is, all the key players in Washington. A month to the day before the Keystone XL postponement, this large cast of characters was “virtually unanimous” in guaranteeing that it would be approved by year’s end.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/15/has_global_warming_become_a_campaign_issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary&#8217;s legacy rests on fixing tainted pipeline approval process</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/hillarys_legacy_rests_on_fixing_tainted_pipeline_approval_process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/hillarys_legacy_rests_on_fixing_tainted_pipeline_approval_process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10127458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Department's shoddy review of a hazardous project is connected to former Clinton aides]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary Clinton is one of those people who never really got a fair shake — she had to endure her husband’s philandering and the right-wing’s endless hatred, down to the scurrilous suggestion that she had something to do with the death of her friend Vince Foster. So it’s been a pleasure to watch her accomplished second act — pretty much everyone has had to admit that she’s been a creditable secretary of state; she spent yesterday in Tripoli <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/19/world/africa/clinton-in-libya-to-meet-leaders-and-offer-aid-package.html">where rebels-turned-rulers fired guns in her honor</a>. Last year, a <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/145394/barack-obama-hillary-clinton-2010-admired.aspx">Gallup poll found</a> she was the most admired woman in the United States.</p><p>That’s why it’s particularly painful to see her nearing the end of her career as our top diplomat with a scandal looming. It’s not too late for her to nip it in the bud, and if she doesn’t President Obama can still put a stop to it, as well. But right now, it threatens to tarnish her legacy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/hillarys_legacy_rests_on_fixing_tainted_pipeline_approval_process/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/19/hillarys_legacy_rests_on_fixing_tainted_pipeline_approval_process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s tone-deaf fundraising emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/obama_fundraising_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/obama_fundraising_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10107640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don't want dinner with the president. We want a leader who will fight for change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For connoisseurs, Barack Obama's fundraising emails for the 2012 election campaign seem just a tad forlorn -- slightly limp reminders of the last time ‘round.</p><p>Four years ago at this time, the early adopters among us were just starting to get used to the regular flow of email from the Obama campaign. The missives were actually exciting to get, because they seemed less like appeals for money than a chance to join a <em>movement</em>.</p><p>Sometimes they came with inspirational videos from Camp Obama, especially the volunteer training sessions staged by organizing guru Marshall Ganz. Here's a favorite of mine, where a woman invokes Bobby Kennedy and Cesar Chavez and <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-WEM-taoG8">says</a> that, as the weekend went on, she "felt her heart softening," her cynicism "melting," her determination building. I remember that feeling, and I remember clicking time and again to send another $50 off to fund that people-powered mission. (And I recall knocking on a lot of New Hampshire doors, too, with my 14-year-old daughter.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/obama_fundraising_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/11/obama_fundraising_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jailed for protecting the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/arrested_tar_sands_protest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/arrested_tar_sands_protest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/25/arrested_tar_sands_protest</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The D.C. police met our peaceful anti-oil pipeline protests with arrests. It only strengthened our resolve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't think it was possible, but my admiration for Martin Luther King, Jr., grew even stronger these past days.</p><p>As I headed to jail as part of the first wave of what is turning into the <a href="http://www.tarsandsaction.org/">biggest civil disobedience action</a> in the environmental movement for many years, I had the vague idea that I would write something. Not an epic like King's "<a href="http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Letter_Birmingham.html">Letter from a Birmingham Jail,</a>" but at least, you know, a blog post. Or a tweet.</p><p>But frankly, I wasn't up to it. The police, surprised by how many people turned out on the first day of two weeks of protests at the White House, decided to teach us a lesson. As they told our legal team, they wanted to deter anyone else from coming -- and so with our first crew they were... kind of harsh.</p><p>We spent three days in D.C.'s Central Cell Block, which is exactly as much fun as it sounds like it might be. You lie on a metal rack with no mattress or bedding and sweat in the high heat; the din is incessant; there's one baloney sandwich with a cup of water every 12 hours.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/arrested_tar_sands_protest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/25/arrested_tar_sands_protest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Obama can do to save the planet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/obama_canada_oil_pipeline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/obama_canada_oil_pipeline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/14/obama_canada_oil_pipeline</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president could single-handedly cut carbon emissions by rejecting Canada's new oil pipeline. Will he do it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The climate problem has moved from the abstract to the very real in the last 18 months. Instead of charts and graphs about what will happen someday, we've got real-time video: first <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/03/110318091141.htm">Russia</a> burning, then <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/05/10/208061/hell-and-high-water-texas-drought-wildfires-deluge-mississippi-floods/">Texas</a> and <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2011/0711/Raging-wildfires-Climate-changes-to-blame-for-record-season">Arizona</a> on fire. First <a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/175292/tomgram:_juan_cole,_the_media_as_a_security_threat_to_america__/">Pakistan</a> suffered a deluge, then <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/world/australia/4531356/Worst-disaster-on-record-for-Queensland">Queensland</a>, Australia, went underwater, and this spring and summer, it's <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/07/us-flooding-forecast-idUSTRE7657H020110707">the Midwest</a> that's flooding at historic levels.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/obama_canada_oil_pipeline/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/obama_canada_oil_pipeline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama strikes out on global warming</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/obama_climate_change_fail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/obama_climate_change_fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/02/obama_climate_change_fail</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president has been happy to destroy the environment. America's geography is making the job a bit harder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our globalized world, old-fashioned geography is not supposed to count for much: mountain ranges, deep-water ports, railroad grades -- those seem so nineteenth century. The earth is flat, or so I remember somebody saying.</p><p>But those nostalgic for an earlier day, take heart. The Obama administration is making its biggest decisions yet on our energy future and those decisions are intimately tied to this continent's geography. Remember those old maps from your high-school textbooks that showed each state and province's prime economic activities? A sheaf of wheat for farm country? A little steel mill for manufacturing? These days in North America what you want to look for are the pickaxes that mean mining, and the derricks that stand for oil.</p><p>There's a pickaxe in the Powder River Basin of Montana and Wyoming, one of the world's richest deposits of coal. If we're going to have any hope of slowing climate change, that coal -- and so all that future carbon dioxide -- needs to stay in the ground.In precisely the way we hope Brazil guards the Amazon rainforest, that massive sponge for carbon dioxide absorption, we need to stand sentinel over all that coal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/obama_climate_change_fail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/obama_climate_change_fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freak weather and climate change: Don&#8217;t connect the dots!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/climate_change_tornadoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/climate_change_tornadoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Floods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/05/24/climate_change_tornadoes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's all just side with the House of Representatives and pretend global warming poses no real threats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caution: It is vitally important not to make connections. When you see pictures of rubble like this week's shots from Joplin, Mo., you should not wonder: Is this somehow related to the tornado outbreak three weeks ago in Tuscaloosa, Ala., or the enormous outbreak a couple of weeks before that (which, together, comprised the most active April for tornadoes in U.S. history). No, that doesn't mean a thing.</p><p>It is far better to think of these as isolated, unpredictable, discrete events. It is not advisable to try to connect them in your mind with, say, the fires burning across Texas -- fires that have burned more of America at this point this year than any wildfires have in previous years. Texas, and adjoining parts of Oklahoma and New Mexico, are drier than they've ever been -- the drought is worse than that of the Dust Bowl. But do not wonder if they're somehow connected.</p><p>If you did wonder, you see, you would also have to wonder about whether this year's record snowfalls and rainfalls across the Midwest -- resulting in record flooding along the Mississippi -- could somehow be related. And then you might find your thoughts wandering to, oh, global warming, and to the fact that climatologists have been predicting for years that as we flood the atmosphere with carbon we will also start both drying and flooding the planet, since warm air holds more water vapor than cold air.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/climate_change_tornadoes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/climate_change_tornadoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money pollution: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce darkens the skies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/money_pollution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/money_pollution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/22/money_pollution</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sixteen nameless corporations are using the Chamber to launch an assault against environmental regulation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Beijing, they celebrate when they have a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/world/asia/10china.html">"blue sky day,"</a> when, that is, the haze clears long enough so that you can actually see the sun. Many days, you can't even make out the next block.</p><p>Washington, by contrast, looks pretty clean: white marble monuments, broad, tree-lined avenues, the beautiful, green spread of the Mall. But its inhabitants -- at least those who vote in Congress -- can't see any more clearly than the smoke-shrouded residents of Beijing.</p><p>Their view, however, is obscured by a different kind of smog. Call it money pollution. The torrents of cash now pouring unchecked into our political system cloud judgment and obscure science. Money pollution matters as much as or more than the other kind of dirt. That money is the single biggest reason that, as the planet swelters through <a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2010/12/climate_change">the warmest years</a> in the history of civilization, we have yet to take any real action as a nation on global warming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/money_pollution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/money_pollution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We can&#8217;t negotiate with nature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/no_compromise_on_environment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/no_compromise_on_environment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/12/16/no_compromise_on_environment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The environmental implications of climate change are too dire for Obama's compromise strategy to work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UN's big climate conference ended Saturday in Canc&#250;n, with claims of modest victory. "The UN climate talks are off the life-support machine," said Tim Gore of Oxfam.&#160;"Not as rancorous as last year's train wreck in Copenhagen," wrote the&#160;Guardian. Patricia Espinosa, the Mexican foreign minister who brokered the final compromise, described it as <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/t/espinosa-the-text-we-have_13471393068875777.html">"the best we could achieve at this point in a long process."</a></p><p>The conference did indeed make progress on a few important issues: the outlines of&#160;<a href="http://accra-mail.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=29350:climate-change-financing-will-benefit-all-un-chief-tells-cancun-meeting&amp;catid=66:world&amp;Itemid=215">financial aid</a>&#160;for developing countries to help them deal with climate change, and some ideas on how to&#160;<a href="http://www.indiaeveryday.com/news-poor-countries-join-the-rich-in-agreeing-to-monitor-1008-2071358.htm">monitor</a>&#160;greenhouse gas emissions in China and India. But it basically ignored the two crucial questions: How much carbon will we cut, and how fast?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/no_compromise_on_environment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/no_compromise_on_environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>95</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the climate talks will be a disaster</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/07/copenhagen_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/07/copenhagen_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/12/07/copenhagen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politics-as-usual won't solve our most pressing problem, no matter what Obama brings to the table]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most political arguments don&#8217;t really have a right and a wrong, no matter how passionately they&#8217;re argued. They&#8217;re about human preferences -- for more healthcare or lower taxes, for a war to secure some particular end or a peace that leaves some danger intact. On occasion, there are clear-cut moral issues: the rights of minorities or women to a full share in public life, say; but usually even those of us most passionate about human affairs recognize that we&#8217;re on one side of a debate, that there are legitimate arguments to the contrary (endless deficits, coat-hanger abortions, a resurgent al-Qaida). We need people taking strong positions to move issues forward, which is why I&#8217;m always ready to carry a placard or sign a petition, but most of us also realize that, sooner or later, we have to come to some sort of compromise.</p><p>That&#8217;s why standard political operating procedure is to move slowly, taking matters in small bites instead of big gulps. That&#8217;s why, from the very beginning, we seemed unlikely to take what I thought was the correct course for our healthcare system: a single-payer model like the rest of the world. It was too much change for the country to digest. That&#8217;s undoubtedly part of the reason why almost nobody who ran for president supported it, and those who did went nowhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/07/copenhagen_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/07/copenhagen_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greening the stimulus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/stimulus_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/stimulus_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2009/01/14/stimulus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists push for a sustainable recovery plan. But one economist warns against trying to do too much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.billmckibben.com/"><strong>Bill McKibben,</strong></a> <strong>environmentalist and author of</strong> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Deep-Economy-Wealth-Communities-Durable/dp/0805087222/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1231878582&amp;sr=8-1"><strong>"Deep Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable Future."</strong></a></p><p>I think we should at least keep in mind the possibility that we won't really get out of this economic crisis -- that far from being a cyclical downturn, it may be a signal of something more remarkable: the confluence of forces, like peak oil, finally starting to bring our growth era to an end. If so, it makes sense to push at least a little investment in the direction of infrastructure that would support a different kind of economy than the one we've spent the last hundred years building, i.e., globalized, centralized and always growing. I'd put some money into decentralized and local renewable energy and into rebuilding the local agricultural infrastructure that's been allowed to rot away. A few billion dollars would buy a bunch of slaughterhouses and small food processors, and it would serve as a kind of insurance that we may need -- especially since, however many green jobs we create, we're not going to entirely ward off climate change.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/stimulus_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/stimulus_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/22/global_warming_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/22/global_warming_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/22/global_warming</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World leaders neglected early warnings about global warming. Now, without an all-out assault on carbon emissions, we'll soon see a "totally different planet."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) issued its <a href="http://www.usgcrp.gov/usgcrp/links/ipcc.htm#4wg1" target="_blank">latest report</a> in early February, it was greeted with shock: "World Wakes to Climate Catastrophe," reported an Australian paper. But <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/global_warming/">global warming</a> is by now a scientific field with a fairly extensive history, and that history helps set the new findings in context -- a context that makes the new report no less terrifying but much more telling for its unstated political implications. </p><p>Although atmospheric scientists had studied the problem for decades, global warming first emerged as a public issue in 1988 when James Hansen, a <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/nasa/">NASA</a> scientist, told Congress that his research, and the work of a handful of other scientists, indicated that human beings were dangerously heating the planet, particularly through the use of fossil fuels. This bold announcement set off a scientific and political furor: Many physicists and chemists played down the possibility of serious harm, and many governments, though feeling pressure to react, did little to restrain the use of fossil fuel. "More research" was the mantra everyone adopted, and funding for it flowed freely from governments and foundations. Under the auspices of the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/united_nations/">United Nations,</a> scientists and governments set up a curious hybrid, the IPCC, to track and report on the progress of that research. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/02/22/global_warming_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2007/02/22/global_warming_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calculating the global warming catastrophe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/24/catastrophe_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/24/catastrophe_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2006/10/24/catastrophe</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists agree that we're hurtling toward disaster. But how fast, and is nuclear power the answer or solar power?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Lovelock is among the planet's most interesting and productive scientists. His invention of an electron capture device that was able to detect tiny amounts of chemicals enabled other scientists both to understand the dangers of DDT to the eggshells of birds and to figure out the ways in which chlorofluorocarbons were eroding the ozone layer. He's best known, though, not for a gadget but for a metaphor: the idea that the Earth might usefully be considered as a single organism (for which he used the name of the Greek earth goddess Gaia) struggling to keep itself stable. </p><p> In fact, his so-called Gaia hypothesis was at first less clear than that -- "hardly anyone, and that included me for the first ten years after the concept was born, seems to know what Gaia is," he has written. But the hypothesis has turned into a theory, still not fully accepted by other scientists but not scorned either. It holds that the Earth is "a self-regulating system made up from the totality of organisms, the surface rocks, the ocean and the atmosphere tightly coupled as an evolving system" and striving to "regulate surface conditions so as always to be as favourable as possible for contemporary life." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/10/24/catastrophe_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/10/24/catastrophe_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Harrison and the Concert for Bangladesh</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/12/01/harrison_concert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/12/01/harrison_concert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2001 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2001/12/01/harrison_concert</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He knew what he should do and he went out and did it. The result was the first, and perhaps the greatest, concert-for-a-cause ever staged.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Dhaka, the sprawling capital of Bangladesh, a small museum on a quiet side road commemorates the country's war of liberation -- a war that, though now dimly remembered, stands among the greatest genocides of the 20th century. </p><p>The museum houses a numbing collection of tragic artifacts from that 1971 conflict -- shirts and sandals of some of the nearly 3 million Bengalis the Pakistani government managed to kill in their convulsive yearlong campaign to retain control over the eastern portion of their country. Maps of mass graves were left behind by the Pakistanis, who then as now enjoyed the patronage of America, in this case because Henry Kissinger thought they were geopolitically significant. Oh, and hanging on the wall of the museum is an LP jacket, and inside it the record of a fundraising concert in Madison Square Garden. </p><p>George Harrison organized the Concert for Bangladesh -- the first, and perhaps the greatest, concert-for-a-cause that rock 'n' rollers ever staged. "Rock reaching its manhood," Rolling Stone said in its review. "Under the leadership of George Harrison, a group of rock musicians recognized, in a deliberate, self-conscious, and professional way, that they have responsibilities -- and went about dealing with them seriously." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/12/01/harrison_concert/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/12/01/harrison_concert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good neighbor policies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/global_treaties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/global_treaties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2001 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/28/global_treaties</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Sept. 11, we are of the world, not apart from it. So maybe we'll stop saying no to vital international agreements.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone I know has been saying "the world is different" since the unbearable attacks of Sept. 11, and though they mean it in some indefinable psychological sense, they are also literally right. The world is different because now the United States must join it. The ecological intuition suggested by those Apollo shots of the Earth is now rock-hard realpolitik. </p><p>For the first time in a generation, we have a truly urgent national project: to track down the vile men who directed the suicide raids and, more broadly, to sap the infrastructure of terror. As the most likely and most vulnerable target of terrorism, we have no choice if we are to protect our future, and so we have asked the rest of the world to help. And they, thankfully, have responded -- governments big and small have pledged their cooperation, signing on for tasks big and small. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/global_treaties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/28/global_treaties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dis-&#8221;Connection&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/28/lydon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/28/lydon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2001 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/2001/02/28/lydon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When a Boston station locked out Christopher Lydon, it silenced public radio's most civilized -- and swinging -- talk-show host.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you feel a kind of panic if you heard the New York Times was going out of business next week? If someone told you they were taking "All Things Considered" off the air? </p><p>The remaining props of semi-serious adult American culture are few enough in number that a threat to any of them feels like an assault. No wonder that topic No. 1 among Boston's intelligentsia for the past week has been the fate of "The Connection," the radio call-in show started by Christopher Lydon at local public radio station WBUR. </p><p>Listeners in the other 80 markets the show reaches may simply assume Lydon is on vacation. In fact, as readers of the Boston papers have known since the story broke on the front of the Boston Globe, there's been what an impolite person would call a scab filling in for him the last 10 days. The station, bogged down in a battle over whether Lydon had any ownership rights to the show, simply locked him out a week ago Friday, saying that for at least two weeks he would have to listen to someone else man his microphone. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/02/28/lydon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/02/28/lydon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

