<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Bruce E. Levine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/bruce_e_levine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does TV actually brainwash Americans?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/does_tv_actually_brainwash_americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/does_tv_actually_brainwash_americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brainwashing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13057292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's evidence to suggest that the mere act of watching makes them more passive and accepting of authority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Historically, television viewing has been used by various authorities to quiet potentially disruptive people—from kids, to psychiatric inpatients, to prison inmates. In 1992, Newsweek (“<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/1992/05/31/hooking-up-at-the-big-house.html" target="_blank">Hooking Up at the Big House</a>”) reported, “Faced with severe overcrowding and limited budgets for rehabilitation and counseling, more and more prison officials are using TV to keep inmates quiet.” Joe Corpier, a convicted murderer, was quoted, “If there’s a good movie, it’s usually pretty quiet through the whole institution.” Both public and private-enterprise prisons have recognized that providing inmates with cable television can be a more economical method to keep them quiet and subdued than it would be to hire more guards.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/does_tv_actually_brainwash_americans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/does_tv_actually_brainwash_americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Americans so easy to manipulate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavlov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behaviorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may be loathe to admit it, but behaviorism and consumerism are cut from the same cloth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> What a fascinating thing! Total control of a living organism!  — psychologist B.F. Skinner</p><p>The corporatization of society requires a population that accepts control by authorities, and so when psychologists and psychiatrists began providing techniques that could control people, the corporatocracy embraced mental health professionals.</p><p>In psychologist B.F. Skinner’s best-selling book <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_Freedom_and_Dignity" target="_blank">Beyond Freedom and Dignity </a> (1971), he argued that freedom and dignity are illusions that hinder the science of behavior modification, which he claimed could create a better-organized and happier society.</p><p>During the height of Skinner’s fame in the 1970s, it was obvious to anti-authoritarians such as Noam Chomsky (“<a href="http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19711230.htm" target="_blank">The Case Against B.F. Skinner”</a>) and Lewis Mumord that Skinner’s worldview—a society ruled by benevolent control freaks—was antithetical to democracy. In Skinner’s novel Walden Two (1948), his behaviorist hero states, “We do not take history seriously”; to which Lewis Mumford retorted, “And no wonder: if man knew no history, the Skinners would govern the world, as Skinner himself has modestly proposed in his behaviorist utopia.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
