<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Carol Lloyd</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/carol_lloyd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When rape is just another workplace dispute</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/11/dawn_leamon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/11/dawn_leamon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/04/11/dawn_leamon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The appalling case of Dawn Leamon, stuck in bureaucratic limbo after claiming sexual assault in Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rape is nasty, brutish and inexcusable, but let's face it: Rape happens in every imaginable setting -- dark urban alleys, jungles in the Congo, respectable marriages. So when rape happens in a war zone by members of our Armed Services or their contracted mercenaries, we should be horrified but not terribly shell-shocked. </p><p> Still, the rape stories coming out of the American workforce in Iraq blindside me every time. Last week the Nation broke <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20080421/houppert">another horror story</a> about a woman who claims to have been sexually assaulted by a U.S. soldier and one of her fellow KBR employees in Iraq. Like the story of Jamie Leigh Jones, the former KBR employee who claims she was held in a shipping container after coming forward about being gang-raped by her co-workers in Iraq, the story of Dawn Leamon, contracted as a paramedic by KBR's foreign subsidiary Service Employees International Inc., is a stomach turner. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/11/dawn_leamon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/11/dawn_leamon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tattooed and proudly flabby on the catwalk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/10/alternative_models/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/10/alternative_models/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/04/10/alternative_models</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An alternative fashion show gives the stiff arm to all those anorexic models.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a moment when we're <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/02/29/skinny_models/"> hearing </a> about female models growing ever more skeletal and male models slimming down to chopsticks, I'd embrace just about any trend in fashion that breaks this tired old mold. </p><p> It has been two long years since 88-pound Ana Carolina Reston died as result of anorexia -- in the fashion world that's like an ice age. Since then there has been outrage, consternation, committees, proposed legislation and a return to the status quo on a crash diet where even the likes of Elle magazine editor <a href="http://www.bravotv.com/Project_Runway/bio/judges/Nina_Garcia">Nina Garcia</a> (not exactly a candidate for a profile in <a href="http://www.fatso.com/">Fat!So?</a>) is <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120415888096598181.html?%20mod=hps_us_inside_today">saying</a> things have "gotten worse." </p><p> So when a CBC <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/arts/artdesign/altfashion.html">article</a> subtitled "The Rise of Alternative Fashion Models" landed in my in box, I couldn't help wondering: Is this for real? And it is -- there is a new breed of diverse body-typed, tattooed and even transsexual models walking the runway. The problem is that they aren't doing it in New York or Milan, Italy, but in the explicitly antiestablishment event Toronto Alternative Arts and Fashion Week (known by the mixed-up acronym FAT), which began April 9. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/10/alternative_models/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/10/alternative_models/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real female heroes: Ingrid Betancourt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/ingrid_betancourt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/ingrid_betancourt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarkozy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/04/04/ingrid_betancourt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The political rabble rouser, rumored to be near death, merits more column inches than all the bad girls of Hollywood combined.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weary of feminine train-wreck tales (Lohan, Spears, pick your poison), I've been yearning for stories about real female heroes. I don't mean ass-kicking female politicians (aka Clinton), but women whose bravery forces you to radically rethink your own life and challenge you to stand up for what you believe in. </p><p>Sadly, there aren't that many news stories about women like this. Or men, for that matter. </p><p>But about six years ago I heard an interview on NPR's "Fresh Air" with Ingrid Betancourt, the former Colombian senator and presidential candidate who gave up her posh life as the wife of a French diplomat to fight corruption in Colombian politics, and her voice haunted me for months. The occasion was the publishing of her memoir in English, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Until-Death-Do-Us-Part/dp/B000C4SWUY/ref=pd_bbs_6?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207346729&sr=8-6">"Until Death Do Us Part: My Struggle to Reclaim Columbia."</a> Her political rabble-rousing wasn't universally popular -- it led to death threats and threats on her children's lives. Those threats in turn forced her children to move to New Zealand to live with their father. Soon after her book was published, in February 2002, Betancourt was kidnapped by FARC, the Marxist guerrillas at war with the government-financed paramilitaries. Since then she's become (because of her dual French-Colombian citizenship) a French cause c&eacute;l&egrave;bre and the guerrillas' most valuable of an estimated 700 hostages. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/ingrid_betancourt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/ingrid_betancourt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Randi Rhodes calls Hillary Clinton a whore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/randi_rhodes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/randi_rhodes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldine Ferraro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/04/04/randi_rhodes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Air America host, now suspended, offers more evidence of a troubling mean streak in our culture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With progressive pundits like <a href="http://therandirhodesshow.com/live/team/randirhodes">Randi Rhodes</a>, who needs wingnuts? </p><p>During a recent appearance in San Francisco, the radio shock jock became the latest poster child for mean grown-up of the year. First she called Geraldine Ferraro and Hillary Clinton "fucking whores," along with an inchoate tribute to Eliot Spitzer: "At least [he] spent $80,000 on women." If you must watch the drivel firsthand, <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=DfdhWi5MILo">get thee</a> here. </p><p>Thursday Air America Radio <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/anneschroeder/0408/Rhodes_update.html">announced</a> that Rhodes had been suspended because of the comments, so good for it. Yet such suspensions won’t offer but a drop in the bucket against our wasteland of media vitriol. Forget sex and violence; I think playground cruelty is the source of the most obscenity. Have you seen the outdoor ad campaign for the new romantic comedy <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-marshall27mar27,1,686461.story">"Forgetting Sarah Marshall"</a>? The black-and-white billboards proclaim: "I'm So Over You, Sarah Marshall," "You Suck Sarah Marshall," "My Mother Always Hated You, Sarah Marshall," and "You Do Look Fat in Those Jeans, Sarah Marshall." It's the first time I've wanted to shield my daughter's eyes from a spectacle in the city. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/randi_rhodes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/04/randi_rhodes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>103</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buckle up those fetuses!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/pregnant_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/pregnant_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/04/03/pregnant_women</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report on pregnant women and seat belts is a reminder of the slippery slope in how we talk about the unborn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://health.usnews.com/usnews/health/healthday/080402/seat-belt-use-by-pregnant-women-could-save-200-fetuses-a-year.htm">U.S. News and World Report article</a> about a new report on seat belt use among pregnant women had me regurgitating my bran flakes this morning. </p><p>"Seat Belt Use by Pregnant Women Could Save 200 Fetuses a Year." Headline peeled from the cover of the Onion? No, it's a story about <a href="http://www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/2008/seatbelts.htm">a new study</a> from the University of Michigan and forthcoming in the <a href="http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymob">American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology</a>. The study found that pregnant women should wear seat belts, not only for their own safety but also for the safety of their fetuses. </p><p>Very well. Since there is apparently some folklore that advises pregnant women against wearing seat belts (strikes me as patently absurd), there's no harm in a scientific study proving the obvious: Seat belts save lives. Not just "regular people" but pregnant women with big vulnerable bellies. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/pregnant_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/pregnant_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What causes crybabies?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/rhesus_monkeys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/rhesus_monkeys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/04/03/rhesus_monkeys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research in primates suggests that it's not just overanxious parenting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next time you hear the theory that it's the mother's fault her baby screams every time she attempts to leave the room, try casually saying, "Sounds like you guys haven't read that 'variation at the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) influences attachment behavior in infant primates' from the latest issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences" and see if you don't get the floor. </p><p>This <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/105/13/5277">study of monkey genes</a>, reported by <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13570-mutant-monkeys-get-hooked-on-a-drug-called-mum.html"> New Scientist</a>, suggests that intense infant and toddler attachment may not be a matter of clingy helicopter mommies creating their own crawling, bawling excuses for Valium addiction. If rhesus macaques offer a window into human experience, the crybaby phenomenon may have biological roots. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/rhesus_monkeys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/04/03/rhesus_monkeys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploiting women to protect animals?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/28/veganism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/28/veganism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/28/veganism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radical vegan movement uses T&#38;A tactics like strip clubs, tarty dancers and fad-diet books.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first taste, Thursday's New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/27/fashion/27vegan.html? _r=1&amp;ref=style&amp;oref=slogin">piece</a> about a Portland, Ore., strip club that promotes veganism seems like just another example of nichification madness. Green-haired soccer mothers who samba while scrapbooking? Give them a support group! Why not a club for horny PETA-philes who sicken at the sight of a leather thong or a juicy steak? </p><p> But the story probes a vein of the radical vegetarian movement that's -- to thoroughly mutilate my metaphors -- gotten on my nerves lately. PETA has always gone to extreme lengths to get its message out, whether it meant splashing the fur coats of celebrities with blood to illustrate the cruelty of the fur industry or photographing a seminaked model in a cage to raise awareness about pig farming practices. All is fair in love and activism. But lately, with <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/02/11/skinny_bitch/index_np.html">"Skinny Bitch"</a> books promoting veganism as the new fad diet and <a href="http://www.veganvixens.com/index.php?page=videos">Vegan Vixens</a> sexing up the airways with their soy-based song 'n' dance, the whole exploitation of women to protect animals has gotten a bit, well, obscene. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/28/veganism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/28/veganism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can abortions lead to mental illness?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/abortions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/abortions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/27/abortions</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate continues about the procedure's risk to a woman's sanity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A story last week headlined <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article3559486.ece">"Royal College Warns Abortions Can Lead to Mental Illness"</a> got Salon internal e-mail servers working overtime deep into a Sunday night. In the wake of "new" studies suggesting that abortions increase the risk of mental illness, Britain's Royal College suggested that women not be allowed to have abortions without getting counseling on the risk to their mental health. </p><p> Just thinking about how such a law would play into the tactics of pro-life clinics in America gives me the heebie-jeebies. ("I'm OK, I don't need counseling"/ "You're <i>not</i> OK -- let us help you deal with your inner demons -- er, doubts.") </p><p> On the other hand, having just come from a conversation with a friend who called her abortion the most "horrible, traumatic experience" of her life, I was curious about what new research might have changed these doctors' minds. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/abortions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/abortions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have a daughter? You wimp</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/daughter_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/daughter_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/27/daughter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A researcher finds a link between a mother's testosterone level and her baby's gender. Oh, boy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, oh boy. Mothers of daughters, don your boxing gloves cuz we got somethin' to prove. If a new study of cow follicles is to be believed, then, as a mother of two daughters, I am probably unambitious, insecure and powerless and suffer from a weak sense of self. Perhaps I shouldn't be so prickly -- maybe I should embrace (big hugs!) my nurturing, empathetic and tolerant essence. </p><p> I know there's all sorts of discomfiting science in this world, and we shouldn't take it personally, especially if it's true. But earlier this week an <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/features/article3598093.ece">article</a> about some ongoing research out of New Zealand downright infuriated me. Or perhaps I should say it raised my testosterone to levels even the Incredible Hulk might have found painful. </p><p> The article covered the new (and old) research of Valerie Grant, a reproductive scientist at the University of Auckland, who has been studying the connection between testosterone levels in women and their tendency to have boys or girls. The higher the testosterone level, her research finds, the higher the incidence of producing a male baby. Her more recent <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=712600428&_sort=v&_st=17&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=0ef018e6a22ab1da8e0f4b2abeefe626">research</a> focuses on cows: High levels of testosterone in bovine ovulatory follicles reliably predict the sex of the embryo. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/daughter_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/daughter_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiction&#8217;s a girl thing, boys heart history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/27/fiction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a gender divide in literary forms?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before it slips into the New Yorker's vast archive of deep thoughts, don't miss <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2008/03/24/080324crat_atlarge_lepore">Jill Lepore's fascinating essay,</a> "Just the Facts Ma'am," about facts and fiction in history, and how fact-flinging, great-man historians have bemoaned the postmodernist historian's emphasis on the inherent subjectivity of all historical storytelling. </p><p> What struck me was the way Lepore recasts this historiographic discussion as a facet of literature's gendered history. She traces the simultaneous rise of academic history as a mostly male pursuit in the 18th century alongside the novel, something she defines as a predominantly female narrative form. In contrast to traditional history, with its "cult of the fact," the novel catered to a female readership with tales of female heroines often authored by women. </p><p> As a historian of American civilization at Harvard, Lepore presumably knows her way around a fact or two, so it's not as if she's spouting essentialist pabulum that women -- those private, intimate, intuitive creatures -- are more naturally drawn to fiction than men -- those public, powerful, rationalist animals. But then what is she trying to say? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/fiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/27/fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Naked bodies as protest signs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/21/naked_protesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/21/naked_protesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/21/naked_protesters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stripping naked is a common form of protest in parts of Africa, where the female body isn't seen as seductive so much as scary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago we wrote about a <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/03/06/miniskirt_march/index.html">miniskirt march</a> in South Africa protesting the widespread sexual assaults on women and the commonplace defense that the woman's seductive dress invited the attack. As I mentioned then, opting for shorter hemlines seems like a kind of modern take-back-our-bodies approach to political protest. But a line in a <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7302243.stm">BBC story</a> about a group of women refugees from Liberia who are being expelled from Ghana made me wonder about the history of women using their bodies as protest signs. </p><p> According to the story, hundreds of women staged a monthlong protest next to a highway over government plans to ship them back to Liberia with $100. The women, who demanded $1,000 or resettlement in the West, were among the 27,000 refugees who ended up in Ghana after the Liberian war, which ended in 2003. Now that Liberia is enjoying relative stability (not to mention its formidable female president), Ghana is trying to clear them out. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/21/naked_protesters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/21/naked_protesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m no bigot, but you should meet my buddies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cbs_poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cbs_poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/20/cbs_poll</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People say they'd vote for a woman or a black man, but they're not sure their friends would do the same.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oy. I tried not to do it -- digest Obama's <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/primary_sources/2008/03/18/obama_speech/index.html">speech about race</a> in America with those feminist enzymes that break everything down along gender lines. While reading his speech I had to resist the echo of a parallel speech uttered by Hillary Clinton exploring how far we have come, and how far we still have to go, as Americans around the subject of gender. I resisted not simply because I don't think it's terribly fair to constantly compare the inequalities of gender with the inequalities of race but also for a more emotional reason. If Clinton got behind the lectern and talked candidly about gender, there would be a cringefest. She's so politically correct, so whiny, so self-serving yadda yadda yadda: I fear it would be a quick but painful political suicide. </p><p>Today's <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/19/opinion/polls/main3949396.shtml">news</a> about a <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/RACE_AND_SEX-mar08a.pdf">new poll </a> from CBS only served to confirm my suspicions. The poll attempted to get at people's biases against voting for an African-American candidate versus their biases against voting for a female candidate by asking Americans not just whom they would vote for but also whom they thought the people they knew would vote for. Unsurprisingly, most people claimed they would happily vote for a woman or a black man. Their friends, however, are much less unencumbered by prejudices. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cbs_poll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/cbs_poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are women biologically drawn to older men?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/older_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/older_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/20/older_men</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's an old stereotype, but it might just have a basis in evolution. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not worth getting all hot and bothered every time evolutionary theologists -- I mean psychologists -- come up with a study that explains how a given gender stereotype is just a natural reflection of Darwinian impulses: <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/article,1390,Ten-Politically-Incorrect-Truths-About-Human-Nature,Alan-S-Miller-PhD-Satoshi-Kanazawa-PhD">why men like blondes,</a> <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/aug/21/sciencenews.fashion">why women like pink.</a> But <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12557">a recent study</a> snagged my attention. It found that women who marry older men have more children. </p><p>I've always cast a jaundiced eye on our cultural assumptions that men should be older (not to mention taller) than their wives. It seemed just another manifestation of the gender imbalances that coursed through our workplaces, government and educational system. Of course, when in love, all bets are off: My anti-age-gap theories didn't stop me from marrying a guy 11 years older. I'd always thought I was making this choice myself, but was there some deep biological impulse driving me to ignore my political analysis to find an optimal breeding partner? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/older_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/older_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say &#8220;nyet&#8221; to Russia&#8217;s vodka for ladies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/booze_for_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/booze_for_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/20/booze_for_women</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering the stats on women and drinking, this new booze is not all that cute.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Russia poised for a feminist revolution, or a catastrophic rise in female alcoholism? A Reuters <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080317/od_nm/russia_vodka1_dc;_ylt=AtGO_duZplemYiuavRNRpJWs0NUE">story</a> about the creation of a vodka targeting female consumers suggests the latter. Broadsheet mentioned the story in a <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/03/17/news_roundup_2/index.html">news roundup</a> earlier this week, but it's worth further investigation. The article raises all the usual questions about products associated with masculinity -- smoking, drinking and shooting -- being repackaged for women. Like most products, the new Russian brand suggests its femininity through color (this time lavender instead of pink), slimness (of the bottle instead of, say, the cigarette) and sweet flavors (vanilla, lime and almond). Lest buyers make any mistake about its target market, the producer has oh-so-cleverly named the distilled potatoes and grains Damaskaya ("Ladies"). But in a country where an estimated 10 percent of the population is alcoholic and women already represent a sizable proportion of the nation's lushes, the article implies that the femmy trappings amount to a public health risk. One doctor told Reuters that he expects a rise in new patients about six months following the "Ladies" marketing blitz. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/booze_for_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/20/booze_for_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a pop singer change gender history?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/14/afghan_star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/14/afghan_star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Idol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/14/afghan_star</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lima Sahar is causing controversy as the first female finalist on "Afghan Star," her country's version of "American Idol."  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chatter about the gender of "American Idol" finalists has always struck a discordant note in me. Maybe in politics we need to keep an eye on gender imbalances, but on pop star reality shows? Who the *%@&$ cares? </p><p> But a recent Associated Press <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/13/afghan.idol.ap/index.html? eref=rss_world">story</a> makes abundantly clear that sometimes those silly battles of the sexes are nothing short of radical -- especially if the woman is gaining purchase via a popular vote in a country where some citizens would happily strip women of most of their civil rights. </p><p> According the article, Lima Sahar, a young woman from the Pashtun region of Afghanistan, has emerged as one of three finalists for "Afghan Star," the country's "American Idol" copycat. There have been female contestants in the past but none have risen as far as Sahar. </p><p> <a href="http://www.afghanstar.tv/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=77&Itemid=31">Watching</a> Sahar draped in head scarf and traditional modest (if colorful) garb, singing in a warbly complex cadence of middle Eastern "pop" with not so much as a swinging of the shoulders, much less the hips, it's hard to see the what the fuss is all about. But make no mistake -- the 18-year-old has got some serious huevos. Already her emergence as a finalist has compelled Afghanistan's conservative clerics council to complain to President Hamid Karzai. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/14/afghan_star/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/14/afghan_star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why they stunted their daughter&#8217;s growth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/pillow_angel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/pillow_angel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/13/pillow_angel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents of the "pillow angel," the severely disabled girl who underwent controversial surgeries to keep her small, give their first interview.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm all for the progress that medical technology can bring, but sometimes the combination of new available therapies all wrapped up into one needy child can leave me as speechless as a stoned surfer on a summer day. </p><p> Wednesday CNN <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2008/HEALTH/conditions/03/12/pillow.angel/?iref=hpmostpop">published</a> an interview with parents who subjected their daughter Ashley to a series of growth-stunting therapies and surgeries to keep her forever small. Since the controversy about Ashley broke last year, this is the first interview given by the parents, who maintain their anonymity. Between 2004 and 2006, doctors at Seattle Children's Hospital removed Ashley's breast buds and performed a hysterectomy, as well as administered hormone therapies that would prevent maturation. The result was "successful": The 10-year-old with a brown pixie cut and hazel eyes has already reached her full size at 4 feet 5 inches and 63 pounds. She will never grow womanly curves or get any bigger or heavier. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/pillow_angel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/pillow_angel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have you ever left your toddler in a car?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/treffly_coyne/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/treffly_coyne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/13/treffly_coyne</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because if the cautionary tale of Treffly Coyne is any indication, you could be in some real trouble.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever -- just for a minute -- left your infant or toddler asleep in a car on a street or in a parking lot? You may have had to unload a car full of groceries, or drop off another kid at school, or go pay for gas at the kiosk. The child may have been sick, the weather foul, extenuating circumstances galore ... </p><p> Well, watch out. According to a recent case, <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5h-zINILllcWKubXt21ki9Ti_eGcQD8VC23R00">reported by the Associated Press,</a> when you return to your car, there may be more than your child waiting for you. I'm not talking about a tragic accident or a kidnapper. I'm talking handcuffs and charges of endangerment. </p><p> Such was the surprise that befell Chicago mother Treffly Coyne on Dec. 8, 2007, when she returned to her car after walking her two elder daughters and one of their friends to donate coins to a Salvation Army kettle a few yards away in front of a Wal-Mart. She'd locked and alarmed the car in a loading zone in front of the store on a stormy night, when a police officer spotted her 2-year-old asleep in her car seat. Informing Coyne that she had broken the law by leaving her child unattended in the car, the police officer put Coyne in handcuffs and took the toddler into child protective custody. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/treffly_coyne/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/treffly_coyne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New debates about the oldest profession</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/spitzer_prostitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/spitzer_prostitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/13/spitzer_prostitution</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can argue over the morality of prostitution, but it's not all about men victimizing women.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was inevitable that the spectacle of Eliot Spitzer appearing as the most humiliated john on the planet would reignite an old <a href="http://rossdouthat.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/ prostitution_and_the_law.php">debate</a> about the world's oldest profession. I admit to being such a Spitzer fan that when I first caught wind of the noxious revelation, I felt mostly pity for the guy and a good deal of impatience with our current vice laws. Can't we just change the laws and let the man keep his job? If every luxury madam were to reveal her client lists, do we honestly think the halls of power wouldn't suffer a serious population drop? </p><p> It's not that I don't have issues with Spitzer's wanton ways: The hypocrisy of hiring a prostitute <i>and</i> prosecuting sex rings is the unforgivable part. And if it wasn't part of a private agreement to explore other sexual vistas, you better believe that <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2008/03/13/silda_spitzer/">his wife</a> has reason to have both of his heads on a platter. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/spitzer_prostitution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/13/spitzer_prostitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old boys&#8217; network invests in female entrepreneurs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/good_ol_boys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/good_ol_boys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/06/good_ol_boys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goldman Sachs pledges $100 million to give disadvantaged women business and management training. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm a fan of microfinance, especially for women. Ample studies have shown if you help women in developing countries, you also help their children and larger communities, which is not always the case when you help men in extremely patriarchal societies. Yet as a devoted <a href="http://www.kiva.org/">Kiva</a> lender, I can't help noting that the businesses many third-world female entrepreneurs are starting are only slight expansions of their household chores. One Ghanaian woman I lent money to recently cooked extra rice and sold it to the village schoolchildren at lunchtime. Another made a small income sewing batik dresses and selling them to her neighbors. I don't mean to imply that these businesses are not feats of enterprising brilliance, but without additional skills beyond sewing and cooking, these impoverished women face radically limited horizons. </p><p> So yesterday's <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/content/mar2008/bs2008035_271887.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_business+schools ">news</a> that Goldman Sachs, one of the world's largest investment firms, has <a href="http://www2.goldmansachs.com/citizenship/10000women/index.html ">pledged</a> $100 million to give 10,000 disadvantaged women business and management training deserves some celebration. According to reports, Goldman Sachs has partnered with several top-flight business schools to implement the program, which will serve women in the United States as well as the developing world. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/good_ol_boys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/07/good_ol_boys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Single? Hand over your briny vegetables!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/06/dating_tips/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/06/dating_tips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2008/03/06/dating_tips</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All you girls looking for love, dating advisor Patti Novak has the solution -- let him open the pickle jar, pick the movie and be a man.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a CNN <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/LIVING/personal/03/03/o.dating.dos.donts/index.html"> reprint</a> of an Oprah.com article, dating advisor Patti Novak engages in the increasingly popular slap-down style of self-help. Asked by single women who don't know why they are single, Novak offers solutions with a common refrain: It's all your fault. </p><p> Not surprisingly, this nasty assumption leads her -- like many of the blaming gurus that attract a mostly female audience -- to some bizarre gender stereotyping. According to the Oprah story, she thinks millions of women are clueless about love. "Somewhere along the line, and I'm really not sure [when]," she's quoted as saying, "we lost our common sense." </p><p> It's hard to get riled up about this accusatory pablum. But some of her more specific advice did strike a particularly sour note. In a passage about what Novak calls "the pickle jar effect," she describes the pitfalls of being a self-reliant, independent woman. "We are so successful today, women. We're fabulous. We work hard. We make good money. We parent. Sometimes what happens when we spend a lot of time alone, we forget to let them open the damn pickle jar," Novak explains. "The one thing I don't think is ever going to change on this planet is men still need to feel like men. So let them open it." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/03/06/dating_tips/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/03/06/dating_tips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

