<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Charles Taylor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/charles_taylor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Justified&#8217;s&#8221; hero gets his own book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/raylan_elmore_leonard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/raylan_elmore_leonard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12207221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elmore Leonard's latest novel revisits the story of the fictional U.S. marshal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a streak of perversity in Elmore Leonard, contemporary American fiction's master of dialogue, choosing the laconic cowboy type as a hero for his crime fiction. True, Leonard started out writing westerns, but the characters who populate his crime stories are talkers, some profane, some funny, some sarcastic, many all at once. But they are talkers.</p><p><a href="http://bnreview.barnesandnoble.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://images.barnesandnoble.com/pImages/bn-review/2010/bnreviewlogo.gif" alt="Barnes &amp; Noble Review" align="left" /></a>Raylan Givens, the U.S. marshal who first appeared in Leonard's short story "Fire in the Hole" and has since become the hero of the FX series <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/justified" target="_blank">"Justified" </a>(which started its third season on Jan. 17; the first two are <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/justified" target="_blank">available </a>on DVD), occupies the center of Leonard's new "<a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D 9780062119469%26 ">Raylan</a>," essentially a couple of long short stories woven loosely into a novel. Leonard's Raylan is a bit more upfront about his appetites than he is in Timothy Olyphant's wittily underplayed portrayal of the character in the series. He's still no chatterbox, though.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/raylan_elmore_leonard/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/21/raylan_elmore_leonard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to catch a Taliban impostor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/terrorist_impostor_films/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/terrorist_impostor_films/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2010/11/23/terrorist_impostor_films</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Afghan officials don't want to be fooled by another huckster, they should take a close look at these movies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/23/world/asia/23kabul.html?pagewanted=2&amp;_r=1&amp;hp">New York Times reports</a> that a still-unidentified Afghan man was posing as a Taliban leader in secret peace talks with Afghanistan officials. It's unclear whether this individual was a con man out to line his pockets, a Taliban agent out to sabotage the talks, or a plant from Pakistani intelligence. The writers, Dexter Filkins and Carlotta Gall, note that the incident "could have been lifted from a spy novel." Regrettably, they may be right. The days when writers of espionage fiction conceived of impostor spies who called themselves Julian or Raoul seem to have passed in favor of writers who are less interested in the glamour of international intrigue than in impostors who don't drink and call themselves Mullah Akhtar Muhammad Mansour.</p><p>Further reports on the story are sure to observe that the entire episode might have been plucked from the movies. This is incorrect. Plucked from <em>films</em>, yes. The story is half-ready for the art house. Strip the tale of glamour, remove any potential for excitement and you've not only got a greenlight, but guaranteed analysis in Cineaste, and a panel accompanying the New York opening consisting of Naomi Klein, a New York University expert on the Middle East, and any film critic dextrous enough to use "hegemony" in a sentence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/terrorist_impostor_films/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/24/terrorist_impostor_films/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>King&#8217;s lost dream</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/01/branch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/01/branch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2006/02/01/branch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final volume of Taylor Branch's magisterial biography shows how Martin Luther King Jr. reached out to his enemies. His example should shame the shrill partisans on both sides of our poisonous cultural divide.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consciously or unconsciously, great storytellers have a way of tipping us off to their concerns right upfront. On the first page of "At Canaan's Edge," the concluding third volume of his magisterial "America in the King Years," Taylor Branch writes about J.T. Haynes, a high-school agriculture teacher in Alabama's Lowndes County, the region that in the '60s would see some of the worst Klan violence against the civil rights movement and would also give rise to the Black Panther Party. "Haynes," Branch writes, "a teacher of practical agriculture, tried to harmonize his scientific college methods with the survival lore of students three or four generations removed from Africa -- that hens would not lay eggs properly if their feet were cold, that corn grew only in the silence of night, when trained country ears could hear it crackling up from the magic soil of Black Belt Alabama." </p><p>You could argue that Haynes, being black himself, had a built-in kinship to the black sons and daughters of Lowndes County. But seen from the midst of our current national division, one that's less dramatic though perhaps just as poisonous as the divisions of the '60s, it's hard not to read Haynes' faith that he could reach his students -- not to overwhelm them or argue them down but, in Branch's exquisitely chosen word, "to harmonize" -- as a belief in the transformative power of discourse, a belief that America, both right and left, has largely abandoned. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/02/01/branch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/02/01/branch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Timeless&#8221; beauty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/11/mcbride_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/11/mcbride_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/music/feature/2006/01/11/mcbride</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With her latest album, Martina McBride breathes new life into contemporary country music by summoning ghosts from the past.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Ghosts from a beautiful dream." That's how country-and-western star Marty Stuart refers to such living luminaries of country music as Loretta Lynn, George Jones, Willie Nelson, Merle Haggard and others in his liner notes for Martina McBride's latest album, "Timeless." Could any description be more loving? Or more withering? </p><p> To describe country music as a place where living greats have become ghosts is to describe it as having betrayed its past, probably the most damning thing you could say about a genre that claims to have such respect for tradition. </p><p> I stopped listening to contemporary country music a few years back. I was tired of the anonymity of the songwriting, of arrangements that sounded like some postmodern representation of country instead of music itself. And the music that sprang up in opposition, alt-country, was usually about as much fun as sitting bare-ass naked on a splintery bench. The alt-country artists sounded as if <i>any</i> expression of pleasure was a sellout. If mainstream country had become the equivalent of a shiny new SUV, alt-country was a dirty window with dead flies littering the sill. A choice between that shopping-mall dominatrix Shania Twain or Lucinda Williams' wallflower moping was no choice at all. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/01/11/mcbride_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/01/11/mcbride_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Soul man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/27/guralnick_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/27/guralnick_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2005/10/27/guralnick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a vast new biography, Peter Guralnick takes on the late, great, silky-smooth crooner Sam Cooke.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does an American artist aim for a broad audience without being accused of selling out? Trying to maintain your distinctiveness while entering the mainstream is particularly fraught for black performers, who can find their desire to generate a widespread following dismissed as a bid to join the white world. </p><p> The most overt, dramatic and controversial example of this struggle was Ray Charles' switch from the R&B he recorded at Atlantic Records to the orchestrated pop, country music, show tunes and Beatles covers he recorded when he made the lucrative move to ABC Records in 1959. Though, if you have the ears to hear, what comes through is consistency. There is just as much soul in Charles' string-laden "Moonlight in Vermont" as in the guttural exhortations of "I Got a Woman." Which is not to say everything he did was equally great, but that Charles' career exposed the narrow ways in which we decide what constitutes "authenticity." It was inevitable that Charles, who truly deserves the overworked appellation "genius," wouldn't be content with one color on the musical palette and would try to encompass as much of American popular music as he could. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/10/27/guralnick_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/27/guralnick_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The biggest star you&#8217;ve never seen</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/rai/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/rai/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2005/02/10/rai</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aishwarya Rai is among the planet's biggest box-office draws. So why doesn't Hollywood know what to do with her?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a promo for the cable channel Imaginasian, a service that targets Asians who have settled in the United States, an attractive group of young Asians talk about the reasons they tune in. The most potent comes from a young man who says that the only people he sees who look like him on American TV are playing the gardener, or the computer nerd. </p><p> The pickings are even slimmer at the movies. </p><p> The foreign stars Hollywood has traditionally welcomed have been overwhelmingly white Europeans or some variety of Anglo-Saxon. That has remained true since silent movies, even as the cinemas of other countries have produced their own stars. No region of the world has produced more charismatic screen personalities in the last 20 or so years than Asia, and due to bad distribution of foreign films and Hollywood's passing them over, almost none of those stars are widely known here. Jackie Chan, Chow Yun-Fat and Michelle Yeoh all have received second-class treatment in Hollywood. And while Zhang Ziyi, who dazzles in <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/08/27/hero/">"Hero"</a> and <a href="/ent/indie/2004/10/07/daggers/">"House of Flying Daggers"</a> (and does her best acting yet in Wong Kar-Wai's upcoming "2046"), is filming "Memoirs of a Geisha" for <a href="/ent/movies/review/2002/12/27/chicago/">"Chicago"</a> director Rob Marshall, Hollywood's more typical use of her is the meager supporting bit she had in <a href="/ent/movies/review/2001/08/07/rush_hour/index.html">"Rush Hour 2."</a> Tony Leung and Andy Lau are so charismatic and commanding in <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/09/24/infernal_affairs/">"Infernal Affairs"</a> (dumped into theaters here by Miramax) you'd expect a Hollywood that retains any sense of what constitutes star power to be beating down their doors. Instead, Matt Damon and Leonardo DiCaprio will take over their roles in Martin Scorsese's planned American remake. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/rai/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/10/rai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shilling for Hitler</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/07/lipstadt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/07/lipstadt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2005 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2005/02/07/lipstadt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eminent historians defended Holocaust denier David Irving in the name of free speech and scholarship. Deborah Lipstadt's account of her libel trial with Irving proves how colossally wrong they were.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's imagine that there was a writer who took as his subject World War II. And let's suppose that because of his ability to amass and cite journals, transcripts, paperwork and all manner of documents, he gained a reputation as a meticulous researcher. Now let's say that the conclusion the writer drew from all of his research was an unshakable conviction that World War II never happened. It was, he insists, a massive fraud, and he declares under oath, "No documents whatever show that World War II had ever happened." </p><p> Now let's allow things to get curiouser and curiouser. </p><p> Despite this writer's farcical conclusion, historians of World War II, men who have spent their professional lives studying and documenting the war, <i>still</i> insist on the soundness of his research. It is possible, they say, to draw faulty conclusions from solid fact-finding. They do not bother themselves with the obvious question of how good the quality of any research can be if it can be used to support what is patently false. One historian says he and his colleagues should be able to admit the view of those with whom they may not be "intellectually akin." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/07/lipstadt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/07/lipstadt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Nobody Knows&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/nobody_knows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/nobody_knows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2005 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/02/04/nobody_knows</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This deceptively simple Japanese film about four children abandoned by their mother evokes the work of Vittorio De Sica and Satyajit Ray.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's a special poignance to children who, because of circumstances, are forced to conduct themselves with the seriousness of adults. As Akira, the 12-year-old protagonist of Hirokazu Kore-eda's quiet, devastating "Nobody Knows," Y&ucirc;ya Yagira maintains an air of watchful self-possession throughout the film. Akira is the oldest of four children, all from different fathers, who are abandoned by their mother in their small apartment. Akira, who must keep his three siblings a secret from his landlord, is the only one of the children allowed outside. When he realizes his mother is not coming back, he fully assumes the role he more or less already fulfills as head of the family. </p><p> Humanist filmmakers have long favored making movies about children and old people, believing that how we treat the most vulnerable among us is a measure of our own humanity. Akira reminds you of the children who have populated the films of Vittorio De Sica or Satyajit Ray, and, more unexpectedly, of the elderly Carlo Battisti in the title role of De Sica's "Umberto D." Unlike Umberto, Akira does not hide his predicament from others because of pride: Having been separated from his younger brother and sisters when the family attempted to get public assistance, he is determined to keep them all together. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/nobody_knows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/04/nobody_knows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The most liberal president of the 20th century</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/02/kotz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/02/kotz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2005 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Luther King, Jr.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2005/02/02/kotz</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick Kotz's new book about the civil right years argues convincingly that the true hero of the American left is LBJ.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toward the end of Nick Kotz's "Judgment Days: Lyndon Baines Johnson, Martin Luther King Jr., and the Laws That Changed America" comes a startling bit of information about the disastrous 1968 Democratic Convention in Chicago. "Barely noticed during violent clashes between police and antiwar demonstrators," Kotz writes, "the proud integrated delegation from the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party was seated in place of the Mississippi regulars. Fannie Lou Hamer, now an official delegate at last, received a standing ovation from the convention as she took her seat." </p><p> That such an event could happen merely four years after the 1964 Democratic Convention in Atlantic City, N.J., where the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party was denied recognition in favor of the Mississippi delegates who were chosen via a system that prevented blacks from voting, is a mark of how far and how fast the civil rights movement had come. That it could be so little noticed is a measure of how quickly the movement was being eclipsed by Vietnam. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/02/02/kotz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/02/02/kotz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why did &#8220;Finding Neverland&#8221; snag an Oscar nomination?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/26/finding_neverland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/26/finding_neverland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2005/01/26/finding_neverland</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not -- despite what some would want us to believe -- because it's the choice of "values voters."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Every year's list of Oscar nominations is immediate fodder for industry analysts, social commentators, et al., out to divine how this year's academy choices reflect society. </p><p> For instance, it's predictable that we'll hear how the five acting nominations given to four black actors represent a real leap forward for African-Americans in the industry. If only someone would explain how Jamie Foxx gets a supporting actor nomination for a movie (<a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/08/06/collateral/">"Collateral"</a>) in which he starred, or how the academy managed to ignore all the actresses in <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/10/29/ray/">"Ray."</a> ("Which Desperate Housewife will get a Golden Globe" generated more ink than will "Why were Regina King, Sharon Warren and Kerry Washington passed over.") </p><p> Among the more creative pundits this year is Ted Baehr who, his publicists tell us, is chairman of the Christian Film and Television Commission and host of "an annual gala film awards extravaganza known as the 'Christian Oscars'. " (Appearing this year, Pat Boone, Guy and Ralna, the Oral Roberts Dancers, and a special tribute to "A Man Called Peter.") Baehr has rated four of the five best picture nominees -- <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/12/17/aviator/">"The Aviator,"</a> "Finding Neverland," <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/12/15/million_dollar/">"Million Dollar Baby"</a> and <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/10/15/sideways/">"Sideways"</a> -- to see how they align with the all important "values voters." (Apparently "Ray" is too far outside the pale to even discuss.) </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/26/finding_neverland/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/26/finding_neverland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Master of the ordinary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/21/0120/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/21/0120/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2005/01/21/0120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haruki Murakami's latest novel unveils a world in which the fantastic is trite and the everyday profound.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all the fantastic and farcical happenings in Haruki Murakami's "Kafka on the Shore" -- amnesia that renders the one who suffers it capable of talking with cats; an evil spirit building a flute of stolen souls, both human and animal; another spirit, this one a benevolent pimp, disguised as Colonel Sanders; a woman whose longing for the lost love of her youth gives rise to a ghost of her younger self; fish and leeches raining from the sky; two Japanese soldiers from World War II standing guard in a forest at the gates to the afterlife -- it's the most ordinary things that attain poetry and weight. </p><p> I came fairly late to Murakami (and still haven't caught up) because I confess to being one of those readers who, hearing that a novel contains elements of fantasy and the surreal, imagine something that's impossibly arch while straining to inspire wonder. Even those of us who are turned off by the drabness of much contemporary realist fiction don't particularly want to read books about spouses that become pets, or goldfish who are really the Buddha, or gardens that contain entrances to subway stations. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/21/0120/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/21/0120/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Elektra&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/elektra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/elektra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2005/01/14/elektra</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zap! Pow! Kerplunk! This flick starring Jennifer Garner as a comic-book assassin-heroine is hardly a killer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of nifty images and physical action that's filmed with clarity raise hopes -- in the opening sequence, at least -- that "Elektra" might be a distraction from the January doldrums. Our first glimpse of the assassin-heroine is a rustle of red and black cloth atop a roof in a snowstorm. When she enters the lair of the target she's stalking, we see her as he does, reflected from head to toe in a glass of scotch he's holding up to the firelight. There's an emphasis in the opening on Elektra as a whispery presence. Jennifer Garner doesn't so much sneak into her target's fortress as materialize inside it. It makes a nice break from the bombast of most action movies. </p><p> There are a couple of neat images later on, too: a deadly Sapphic kiss between Elektra and a villain whose touch causes the living to wither and die (the kiss takes place in a forest as green leaves fall off trees and create a shower of black around them); and an eagle tattoo that comes to life, leaving its bearer's chest. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/elektra/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/14/elektra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Alias&#8221; grace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/12/alias_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/12/alias_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2005/01/12/alias</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, butt-kicking women have come to dominate pop culture. But nobody knocks you down flat like Sydney Bristow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough time has passed for it to become apparent that Tolstoy was wrong -- it's all unhappy families that are alike. J.J. Abrams must have realized something like that when he set out to create "Alias" (Wednesdays at 9 p.m. EST on ABC). Beyond its obvious reference to the panoply of funky disguises worn by its heroine, CIA agent Sydney Bristow (Jennifer Garner), the title is a clue that the show is pretending to be something other than it is. </p><p> I first tried watching "Alias" when it premiered in the fall of 2001. I was looking for something like the mod, gadget-laden spy movies and TV shows I loved as a kid. Despite the moments when the show was what I expected it to be -- Sydney on some mission strutting into a club/hotel/casino in whole runway seasons' worth of chic outfits -- "Alias" struck me as pedestrian. Too little gadgetry and too much family and workplace drama. That's exactly the point. </p><p> To treat "Alias" as if it were about nothing other than Garner's costume changes, or as though it were some spy-girl fantasy for <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/05/arts/television/05heff.html">comic-sated fanboy geeks,</a> is to miss the wit and emotion and twisty narrative pleasure it offers. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/01/12/alias_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/01/12/alias_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 10 best movies of 2004</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/24/best_movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/24/best_movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Zacharek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2004/12/24/best_movies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon's critics pick the year's finest films -- from the modest "Before Sunset" to the operatic "House of Flying Daggers" to the magical "A Very Long Engagement" to the triumphantly weird "Incredibles"  and "SpongeBob."
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Stephanie Zacharek's 10 Best Films </b> </p><p> The compilation of the 10-best list is the hardest chore of the year, not because it isn't a pleasure to look back on the movies that were the most delightful or affecting but because the final list never feels as definitive as it should. The things we love about movies are far too slippery for lists. Javier Bardem's face, so beautifully chiseled and yet a thorny argument against the tyranny of joie de vivre, in <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/12/17/sea_inside/"> "The Sea Inside,"</a> for example: It's a face that could constitute a whole category in itself. </p><p> No character made me laugh harder than Edna Mode, the dictatorial fashion designer in "The Incredibles" -- as actors, cartoon characters get no respect. And a picture like Catherine Breillat's <a href="/ent/movies/review/2004/10/15/breillat/">"Anatomy of Hell,"</a> flawed and difficult, has lingered with me longer than other movies I've seen that I love and admire more. How do you explain that? You don't. You simply make a list, which is, at best, a valiant attempt to fold the greatest number of intangibles into a measly handful of discrete, numbered items. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/24/best_movies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/24/best_movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eyes wide shut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/hotel_rwanda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/hotel_rwanda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2004/12/22/hotel_rwanda</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The world looked away when evil swept through Rwanda. Ten years later, a movie demands that we finally open our eyes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In "Hotel Rwanda" it's a few days into the 1994 genocide in which the majority Hutu tribe would eventually slaughter nearly a million of their Tutsi countrymen with no interference from the West. Refugees have holed up at the Mille Collines luxury hotel in Kigali, Rwanda's capital, waiting for the international intervention forces they expect to protect them from the marauding Hutus. Colonel Oliver (<a href="http://archive.salon.com/people/bc/1999/12/14/nolte/">Nick Nolte</a>), who's in charge of the U.N. peacekeeping forces, greets the arriving international troops with relief that, in just a few seconds, turns to disgust. </p><p> Following Oliver into the hotel bar, the manager of the Mille Collines, Paul Rusesabagina (Don Cheadle), congratulates the colonel on how well he has protected the refugees while awaiting the international forces. What Paul doesn't know, and what Colonel Oliver has to break to him, is that the forces are there only to provide safe passage out of Rwanda for Europeans. They will do nothing to stop the slaughter or aid the Tutsis. The scene that follows between Cheadle and Nolte is so emotionally violent that it takes you a few seconds to register that you're hearing what you're hearing. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/hotel_rwanda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/22/hotel_rwanda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Spanglish&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/spanglish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/spanglish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2004/12/17/spanglish</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know why Bush won? Watch James L. Brooks' smug message drama, which tries to skewer clueless liberal do-gooders but only succeeds in impaling itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Douglas Sirk's 1959 "Imitation of Life" a homeless, widowed black woman and her small daughter are taken in by a widowed white woman with a little girl of the same age. Years pass. The white woman, Lora (Lana Turner), has become a successful actress. The black woman, Annie (Juanita Moore), works as her maid. She would have been destitute without Lora's beneficence and yet the movie shows us the divide that charity can't cross. In one scene, Annie envisions the friends who'll come to the funeral she has saved for and Lora says, "It never occurred to me you had many friends." In the least reproving tone imaginable, this woman, who has worked for and lived with her white employer for years, says, "Why, Miss Lora, you never asked." </p><p> That invisibility isn't lost on Annie's daughter, the now grown Sarah Jane (Susan Kohner). Sarah Jane is light-skinned enough to pass for white, and that's just what she does. She tells her mother that she doesn't want the only boys she meets to be "busboys, cooks, chauffeurs." Implicitly, she's telling Annie that she wants something better than to be a maid like her. All Sarah Jane finds is a job dancing at a sleazy nightclub -- but at least, she reasons, it's her choice, not a destiny she never asked for. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/spanglish/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/spanglish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Sea Inside&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/sea_inside/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/sea_inside/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2004/12/17/sea_inside</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The strapping Javier Bardem soars as a quadriplegic   man on a quest to die with dignity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's an element of perversity in casting Javier Bardem as a quadriplegic. Whether he uses it exuberantly (as he did in <a href="http://archive.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2001/01/26/before/">"Before Night Falls"</a>) or holds it in reserve (as he did in <a href="http://archive.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2003/05/02/malkovich/">"The Dancer Upstairs"</a>), Bardem is defined by his strapping physicality. (He might seem nearly hulking if he weren't such a lyrical actor.) And he has the sort of regal profile that wouldn't be out of place on an ancient Roman coin. </p><p> Bardem spends almost all of his performance in Alejandro Amen&aacute;bar's fine new film "The Sea Inside" ("Mar Adentro") in bed. He's playing the Galician Ram&oacute;n Semprado, paralyzed from the neck down in a swimming accident as a young man, who badgered the Spanish government for 30 years to win the legal right to commit suicide. It's as if Bardem has chosen the role as an acting test, to see if he can retain his expressiveness while severely restricting his physical resources, and without bathing Ram&oacute;n in the false saintly nobility that many actors in a part like this would seize on as a fast track to awards. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/sea_inside/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/sea_inside/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Million Dollar Baby&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/15/million_dollar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/15/million_dollar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/review/2004/12/15/million_dollar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood's boxing movie floats like a lead balloon and stings like a dead bee.


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/clint_eastwood/">Clint Eastwood</a> the Manchurian Candidate? He must be. Brainwashing seems the only plausible explanation for the extraordinary praise given his drab, plodding movies. The overdeliberate, humorless revenge drama <a href="/ent/movies/review/2003/10/08/mystic_river/">"Mystic River"<a /> was directed and hailed as if it were Greek tragedy -- and next to Eastwood's new "Million Dollar Baby," it is. </p><p> "Million Dollar Baby" is generating astonishing critical word of mouth, figuring prominently in the year-end voting for critics awards and winning Eastwood best-directing honors from the New York Film Critics Circle. </p><p> Have any of the critics praising "Million Dollar Baby" actually ever seen another movie -- any movie? </p><p> A compendium of every clich&amp;eacute from every bad boxing melodrama ever made, "Million Dollar Baby" (written by Paul Haggis from stories by F.X. Toole) tries to transcend its cornball overfamiliarity with the qualities that have long characterized Eastwood's direction -- it's solemn, inflated and dull. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/15/million_dollar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/15/million_dollar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Polysyllabic Spree&#8221; by Nick Hornby</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/hornby_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/hornby_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Hornby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2004/12/09/hornby</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the author of "High Fidelity," a delightful celebration of the  joys of reading that reminds us why most literary criticism is so bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/nick_hornby/">Nick Hornby's</a> new collection of his essays from the Believer, the literary magazine edited by Heidi Julavits, is named in homage to the rock collective the Polyphonic Spree, who dress in choir robes and perform feel-good, orchestral pop. It's Hornby's gentle way of tweaking the magazine's earnestness. When he writes that the Believer staff's promise of a night on the town in New York resulted in their dragging him to a two-and-a-half-hour reading of the nominees for the National Book Critics Circle, you mourn for Hornby and his evening. His description of the Believer staff's behavior at the event is a gag: "They stood, and they wept, and they hugged each other, and occasionally they even danced -- to the poetry recitals, and some of the more up-tempo biography nominees." It isn't hard to believe that the event was the literary equivalent of Up With People. </p><p> Sometimes Hornby and the Believer butt heads. He writes in one column that he and the magazine's editors reach an agreement "that if it looks like I might not enjoy a book, I will abandon it immediately, and not mention it by name." Listed at the top of that column are "Unnamed Literary Novel" and "Unnamed Work of Nonfiction." In the magazine's debut issue, Julavits wrote an essay arguing that most book criticism is too snarky and negative, and Hornby has more or less been instructed to avoid negative reviews. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/hornby_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/hornby_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can the movies rescue America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2004 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Moore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2004/12/09/movies_2004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a year when Mel Gibson and Michael Moore exploited our deep divisions, we needed more Incredible films to bring us together.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On one of the documentaries included in the handsome new DVD edition of "Gone With the Wind," there's a story about the movie's first super-secret sneak preview at the Fox Theater in Riverside, Calif., two hours outside of Los Angeles. It was a blisteringly hot late summer night and the theater -- "air cooled," remembers William Ericson, a boy at the time and there with his mother -- was packed. The audience had just sat through the B-feature "Hawaiian Nights" and was settling in for Gary Cooper in "Beau Geste" when a man took the stage to tell them that, instead, they had been chosen to see a major Hollywood preview. He wouldn't reveal what they were seeing but did say it was a rather long picture and if anyone wanted to call home they should because the doors of the auditorium were going to be locked. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/09/movies_2004/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

