<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Daryl Lindsey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/daryl_lindsey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>After the fall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2001 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Taliban is on the run. What happens now? Who should govern Afghanistan? And how hard will it be to win the war of the caves?	]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Taliban forces retreated Tuesday from Kabul, Afghanistan's capital, the U.S.-supported Northern Alliance took control of the city. The White House said that President Bush was "very pleased" with the advance. The Taliban's unexpectedly sudden withdrawal -- on the heels of defeats in Herat and Mazar-e-Sharif -- represented an important military triumph for the U.S. (On Tuesday, it was reported that Northern Alliance troops had pushed on from Kabul to the Taliban's stronghold, Kandahar.) But the Taliban's unexpectedly sudden withdrawal also gave new urgency to major issues -- Afghanistan's political future, the trustworthiness of the Northern Alliance, the next step in the military campaign, the status of humanitarian aid and the relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan. </p><p>Several experts on the region spoke with Salon about what the future holds for Afghanistan and the region and what the United States should do next. </p><p><b>Joel Charny, Asia expert from Refugees International </b> </p><p>The Northern Alliance progress means that 70 to 80 percent of the Afghans in need of assistance are now in Northern Alliance territory. This is critical. We need the Northern Alliance to provide enough stability and security so we can provide humanitarian aid. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/11/14/kabul_reacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We are all Americans&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/09/13/germany</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the news that several hijackers studied in Hamburg, Germans throw their support behind Bush, and the tensions of his early months in office melt away -- for now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are not the only ones who have been glued to their television sets since Tuesday's horrific attacks in New York and Washington. All across Europe, TV stations have followed the story nonstop, often forgoing commercials, and a deep sense of horror has taken hold that could make it easier for President Bush to build international support for retaliation. </p><p> Many Germans saw Tuesday's events as an attack against them as well, since the terrorist strike was clearly intended as a blow to the West. But Germany's sense of being closely involved with the American drama was heightened Thursday when news broke that three of the men involved in the hijackings lived in Hamburg and may have planned part of the attacks from here in what is being described as a terrorist cell. </p><p> Mohammed Atta, the 33-year-old who likely flew American Airlines flight 11, and his cousin, Marvan Al-Shehhi, 23, who was on American Airlines Flight 175, lived in a $500-a-month apartment in Hamburg's Harburg neighborhood, according to the Bild Zeitung newspaper. The two men left Germany in March 2001 for Florida, where they enrolled in flight classes at Huffman Aviation in the Gulf Coast town of Venice. German commandos reportedly stormed eight apartments in Hamburg and arrested one suspect after being tipped off by the FBI Wednesday night. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/09/13/germany_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A royal pain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/31/princes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/31/princes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2001/08/31/princes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romance can get complicated for anyone, but it's become a nightmare for the world's crown princes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the cult of celebrity worship, nothing ranks higher than royalty. Yet royalty's tradition and glamour often shield a murky reality that, as we learned from this summer's regicide in Nepal, can be more Columbine than Camelot. Royal marriages are the stuff of Franklin Mint and Bridal Mart dreams -- with higher-profile couplings like Charles and Diana or Edward and Sophie Rhys-Jones immortalized in porcelain dishes and figurines. But behind every dream wedding, there are numerous near misses and crash landings. </p><p> A scan of recent royal relationship catastrophes reveals what a nightmare life has become for crown princes, the world's most eligible bachelors. For every wedding day special on network television, there seem to be dozens more varnish-removing expos&eacute;s in the tabloids spotlighting every royal misstep -- be it sexual or financial -- which is making it downright difficult for the next in line for the throne to make it from "Will you marry me" to "I do." The torture starts almost from the first date. If the monarchs had their way, the poor princes would lead lonely, celibate lives or wind up with handpicked fiancies bred for the icy confines of proper royal life. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/31/princes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/31/princes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Germany allows its first gay &#8220;marriages&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/02/gay_marriage_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/02/gay_marriage_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2001/08/02/gay_marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the law just one day old, same-sex couples are flooding the wedding registry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The district of Schvneberg, long the gay center of this city and once the romping ground of expatriate writer Christopher Isherwood, was ground zero yesterday for the first celebrations -- legal and in the streets -- of Germany's first legally recognized civil unions of same-sex couples. </p><p>Around 9 a.m., several dozen people gathered inside Schvneberg's City Hall -- where in 1963 President John F. Kennedy gave his famous "Ich bin ein Berliner" speech -- to witness the union of theologian Gudrun Pannier and lawyer Angelika Baldow, the first lesbian couple to apply for a same-sex civil union in Berlin. Outside were an American-style media stakeout and a few demonstrators, most of whom protested that the new law, which permits "registered domestic partnerships," falls short of bestowing equal legal rights on same-sex unions. </p><p>Inside the City Hall, Pannier and Baldow, both 36, exchanged vows before family, friends and reporters. "We exchanged rings symbolically five years ago," says Pannier, "but this is the real thing." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/02/gay_marriage_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/02/gay_marriage_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woe is me-zine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/12/sullivan_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/12/sullivan_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/07/12/sullivan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After bemoaning attacks from the "far left," Andrew Sullivan returns a sponsorship from the pharmaceutical industry.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Andrew Sullivan's latest controversy began Tuesday, when the New York Times published an <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/09/business/09ZINE.html">article </a> on the recent phenomenon of online "me-zines" -- scrappy, self-produced, sometimes stream-of-consciousness commentaries by celebrity intellectuals. But Sullivan's attempt to achieve what has eluded most online journalism ventures -- make his Web site self-sustaining, maybe even make a profit -- landed him in new trouble with his critics this week, after the story matter-of-factly reported that Sullivan had signed up his first corporate sponsor: the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. </p><p>PhRMA is the association that looks out for the interests of industry giants like Pfizer and Merck on Capitol Hill and elsewhere. What the Times failed to report is that Sullivan has used his own Web site, as well as his posts at the New York Times Magazine and the New Republic to repeatedly -- and controversially - defend the pharmaceutical industry against criticism over its role in the global AIDS pandemic. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/12/sullivan_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/12/sullivan_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. commits to AIDS reduction</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/28/aids_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/28/aids_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/06/28/aids</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its far-reaching declaration could funnel billions toward reducing the spread of the disease by 25 percent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations wrapped up its first-ever meeting focused on the global AIDS crisis in New York this week with a sweeping 16-page "Declaration of Commitment" on HIV/AIDS endorsed by all 189 member nations. Surely no one will leave completely happy with the result: an international treaty with bold propositions that is, ultimately, unenforceable. </p><p> But there were also enough firsts for AIDS activists, women's rights activists and gay and lesbian human rights groups that nearly everyone could walk away with some sense of a victory. </p><p> "I must say that, for once, controversial issues were not covered in a blanket of diplomatic language," said Pieter Piot, executive director of the United Nations AIDS program (UNAIDS). "The issues were discussed explicitly." Or, as Gudmund Hernes, director and coordinator of AIDS activities for the U.N. agency UNESCO, put it: "If anyone told me 30 years ago that the General Assembly would talk about condoms, I would have said that it was impossible." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/28/aids_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/28/aids_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A pandemic fueled by poverty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/27/aids_poverty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/27/aids_poverty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/06/27/aids_poverty</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A doctor says the fight to get cheap AIDS drugs to  Africa is misguided: These people need water, food and basic healthcare.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the first day of the United Nations Special Session on HIV/AIDS in New York this week, activists, nongovernmental organizations and delegates have clashed over how to face the global epidemic. Not surprisingly, one of the most contentious issues facing delegates is money: whether U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan's proposed superfund should be used primarily for prevention of the disease or whether a significant chunk of it should be used to treat those who are already sick with expensive anti-retroviral drugs. </p><p>An alliance of groups argues for loosening intellectual-property laws in Africa and easing pharmaceutical patents in order to make available inexpensive, generic versions of the AIDS drugs that have prolonged countless lives in the West. Groups like ACT-UP, Oxfam and HealthGAP have asked the United Nations to use a good portion of its superfund monies to buy those drugs in bulk and give them to developing countries. </p><p>But critics of those proposals say that the generic-drugs plan would discourage pharmaceutical companies from continuing to fund AIDS research. More significantly, they say, the sub-Saharan African countries most affected by the disease lack the healthcare infrastructure necessary to distribute the complicated drug regimens. Without that infrastructure, the cocktail treatments would not be effective. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/27/aids_poverty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/27/aids_poverty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIDS conclave off to rocky start</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/aids_conference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/aids_conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/06/26/aids_conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A gay rights groups struggle with Islamic dogma at U.N. meeting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A special meeting on the international AIDS crisis got off to a rocky start Monday, when some member states tried to block the inclusion of an international gay rights speaker on the agenda. </p><p> That dispute was resolved by late afternoon, but members continued to debate whether a draft declaration pledging to halt the spread of HIV and AIDS -- and offering support for the $7 billion to $10 billion superfund proposed by Secretary-General Kofi Annan -- should specifically cite homosexuals, sex workers or intravenous drug users as people vulnerable to the disease. Conservative Islamic countries, led by Egypt, sought more generic terms that they said would let them support the effort without betraying their religious principles. </p><p> The spat over the gay-rights group's inclusion, as well as over semantics, underscores the difficulty the United Nations faces in mounting a unified international response to the worldwide AIDS crises. In North America and Europe, a high percentage of HIV/AIDS cases have been concentrated among those in the gay community, intravenous drug-using populations and sex workers; in Africa, the population most devastated by the illness has been heterosexual. Meanwhile, frank discussion of homosexuality, which is forbidden under Islam, is difficult if not impossible for the governments of more than a few member nations, as is talk of drug use or prostitution. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/aids_conference/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/aids_conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caught in the act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/conference_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/conference_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2001 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/06/26/conference</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Activist groups are kicked out of U.N. headquarters  in a protest at the global AIDS conference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Close to two dozen members of activist groups ACT-UP, Oxfam America and the Health GAP Coalition were forcibly removed from the United Nations headquarters Tuesday afternoon after they marched through the basement of the building, calling for debt relief and greater access to AIDS drugs in developing nations. The protest was <a href="/news/feature/2001/06/25/aids/index.html">a tame affair by ACT-UP standards,</a> but no less brave than usual given the U.N.'s ban on demonstrations in its building. It was a continuation of the controversy that began on Monday when U.N. member states and other concerned groups <a href="/news/feature/2001/06/26/aids_conference/index.html">kicked off</a> their meeting about the international AIDS crisis. </p><p>Shaking pill bottles filled with pennies, the protesters chanted: "Pills cost pennies, greed costs lives, billions for the fund or millions die." Though the action lasted only a few minutes before a swarm of U.N. security officers sealed off the corridor in the basement and contained the group, the activists managed to bewilder bystanders and delegates alike, some of whom loudly clapped or otherwise cheered the group. The protesters had intended to march around a crowded cafeteria in the bowels of the U.N. headquarters, but made a tactical mistake when they marched down a hallway that led to an exit instead. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/conference_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/26/conference_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AIDS activists change their act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/25/aids_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/25/aids_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/06/25/aids</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the eve of a United Nations conference, the once-militant ACT-UP revises its tactics and focus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talk to the founding members of ACT-UP, the ones who survived the first wave of AIDS deaths in the 1980s and lived long enough to be able to undergo cocktail therapy treatments, and they like to tell you about guilt. </p><p>"I feel a great degree of survivor guilt that I am able to live for 20 years with HIV when my brothers and sisters around the world are dying because they don't have my privilege of wealth and access to these drugs," said Eric Sawyer, the 47-year-old co-founder of ACT-UP New York. It compels me to spend every hour I can fighting for their right to access essential medicines." </p><p>The fight for access to life-prolonging drugs has led to a remarkable transformation in the public tactics of ACT-UP. Twelve years ago, ACT-UP made global headlines with over-the-top and occasionally violent protests against the government and religious leaders for their slow and sometimes homophobic response to the AIDS epidemic. In the 1990s, many of the organization's early leaders died -- literally. Then came promising new treatments and a focus on lowering drug prices -- a less dramatic story. The group slipped into a state of semi-obscurity until the battle in South Africa began, in 1998, over the manufacture of generic drugs and importation of less expensive brand-name drugs from other countries. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/25/aids_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/25/aids_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The AIDS-drug warrior</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/18/love_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/18/love_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/06/18/love</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Activist Jamie Love says pharmaceutical companies 
must be forced to yield their patents to save hundreds of thousands 
of lives. Is he a visionary -- or a dangerous radical?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Every day a new headline emerges touting a victory in the global fight against the AIDS epidemic. One day, a pharmaceutical company announces it will deeply discount its drugs for the African market. The next, Yale University and Bristol-Myers Squibb announce they will no longer enforce their patent on an AIDS drug used in HIV-ravaged South Africa. Then 39 companies abruptly withdraw their lawsuit against the South African government over a 1997 law that would make it easier for the country to produce generic versions of patented drugs or import brand-name drugs from other countries to sell at cheaper prices. </p><p>All good news, right? </p><p>Wrong, says Jamie Love. It's just slick humanitarian-flavored spin. </p><p>For Love, one of the leading -- and most outspoken -- activists on the front lines of the AIDS-drug pricing wars, the real issue is that the major pharmaceutical companies still maintain control over who can manufacture their patented drugs and how much they cost. As the head of the Ralph Nader-founded <a target="new" href="http://www.cptech.org">Consumer Project on Technology</a>, Love has been trying for years to persuade governments in developing nations to wrest control of AIDS-drug policy and pricing from the pharmaceuticals. Love argues that by issuing so-called compulsory licenses that would allow generic drug manufacturers to create cheap and ubiquitous versions of AIDS drugs, developing nations would drive down the cost of raw materials, increase competition and make the drugs more widely available. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/06/18/love_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/06/18/love_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olson by a whisker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/25/olson_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/25/olson_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2001 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/05/25/olson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a surprising reversal of fortune, before  relinquishing control of the Senate, Republicans force a vote on the controversial solicitor general --  and win.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the clock on solicitor general nominee Ted Olson wound down, Republicans took a bold final shot, and Democrats, perhaps already satisfied knowing that they would soon be the new majority party in the Senate, made only a token effort to block it, and Olson won by a 51-47 vote. </p><p> While it might have looked like the Democrats were firmly opposed to Olson's nomination, the party, according a senior Democratic staffer close to the proceedings, could not recruit the requisite number of 41 to support a filibuster to hold up the Olson nomination. So when the roll call finally came, only two Democrats (Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga., and Sen. Ben Nelson, D- Neb.) voted for Olson, but the other 47 who voted against him already knew he was a sure thing. </p><p>Olson's success was a remarkable reversal of fortune. When word spread earlier in the week that Sen. Jim Jeffords, R-Vt., would be abandoning the GOP to become an independent, it slowly became clear that the Democrats would win control of the Senate, and Olson's chances began to look grim. Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., predicted Wednesday that, under Democratic Senate rule, "Ted Olson will be practicing law, making a lot of money" in the private sector. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/25/olson_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/25/olson_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smearing David Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/brock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/brock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/05/17/brock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted Olson's defenders say the former right-wing journalist had nothing to do with the Arkansas 
Project. But the project's own records prove they're wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservative writer David Brock received nearly $40,000 from the American Spectator's Arkansas Project, project records show, despite claims by Spectator editors that Brock had nothing to do with the controversial Clinton-bashing project. </p><p> Brock moved to the center of the drama over President Bush's solicitor general nominee, Ted Olson, when he told a Judiciary Committee staffer and the Washington Post that Olson was integral to the Arkansas Project -- the American Spectator's aggressive investigations into the private life of President Clinton, funded with roughly $2 million from conservative billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife -- despite Olson's claims to the contrary. Olson's supporters struck back, insisting Brock had nothing to do with the project. </p><p>"Although Mr. Brock has lately claimed to have been part of the so-called Arkansas Project, he was not," Spectator editor in chief R. Emmett Tyrrell and executive editor Wladyslaw Pleszczynski wrote to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. "The record on this is indisputable." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/brock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/brock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Olson&#8217;s Arkansas problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/14/archive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/14/archive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2001 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/05/14/archive</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite his evasive disavowals, Salon investigations showed the right-wing consigliere was deeply involved in a sordid plot to bring down President Clinton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday delayed its vote in the confirmation of Ted Olson as President Bush's solicitor general. The move came after Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., publicly questioned inconsistencies in the answers Olson has provided about his role in the Arkansas Project, a $2.4 million, five-year effort to dig up dirt on President Clinton. </p><p>Fearing that his confirmation could be derailed by the allegations, Olson has attempted to downplay his role in the Arkansas Project, but with each new response, he seems to backpedal from his original account even further. </p><p>Olson's evasiveness drew a rebuke from the ranking Democrat on the committee. "The credibility of the person appointed to be the Solicitor General is of paramount importance," Leahy warned in a May 4 letter that followed Olson's written responses to additional questions forwarded by the committee following his April 5 confirmation hearing. </p><p>In 1998, Salon ran a number of stories investigating Olson's relationship with the right-wing magazine American Spectator, under whose auspices the Arkansas Project was run, and the circumstances under which he came to provide pro-bono legal representation for key Whitewater witness David Hale. Salon's reporting refutes many of the statements made by Olson at his confirmation hearing and in his subsequent written responses and raises serious questions about his fitness for the office of solicitor general. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/14/archive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/14/archive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The children&#8217;s war, again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/11/middle_east_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/11/middle_east_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2001 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/05/11/middle_east</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The killing of two Israeli teenagers, including one with dual American citizenship, brings the war home -- but that's not likely to stop the bloodshed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two Israeli boys, hiking at the edge of the Judean desert, were bludgeoned to death Wednesday by Palestinian vigilantes, according to police. Another week, it seems, another brutal killing of a child in the Middle East conflict. </p><p> The latest victims were 13-year-old Yaakov Mandel, a dual American-Israeli citizen whose family emigrated to an Israeli settlement several years ago, and 14-year-old Yosef Ishran. Their bodies were found in a cave near the area where they had been hiking while playing hooky. According to police reports, the boys' bodies were so badly mutilated that one could only be identified by his fingerprints. The Associated Press reports that the killers "dipped their hands in the teenagers' blood" and smeared them across the walls of the cave -- an almost biblical act of cruelty. </p><p>Police believe Palestinians killed the children, whom they happened upon in a chance encounter, and they have arrested a dozen suspects. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/11/middle_east_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/11/middle_east_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Joe Camel&#8221; ads of AIDS?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/drug_ads_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/drug_ads_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/05/08/drug_ads</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FDA says ads for drugs to suppress HIV are making false promises, and could be contributing to an epidemic of unsafe sex.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On bus shelters, billboards, subway stations and other public spaces in New York, San Francisco, Los Angeles and Miami, a relatively new addition to the landscape has come under fire. Critics are in an uproar over upbeat advertisements for prescription drugs designed to suppress the HIV virus. The ads often feature attractive, healthy looking models, with muscled bodies and chiseled faces that mirror the ideals of beauty often held up in gay enclaves from San Francisco to New York. </p><p>While it's true that more and more HIV-positive people are responding to treatment with these anti-retroviral drugs, the Food and Drug Administration says the direct-to-consumer ads have crossed the line and are misleading the public about the realities of the disease. On April 27, the FDA ordered pharmaceutical companies to change the ads within 90 days. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/drug_ads_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/drug_ads_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amy and Goliath</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/01/aids_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/01/aids_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/05/01/aids</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A first-year law student brought a giant pharmaceutical to its knees. But will her victory for South Africa's AIDS sufferers deprive the world of new medicines?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For Amy Kapczynski, the turning point came in Durban. When she arrived in the South African city for the World AIDS Conference last July, she was greeted by 5,000 demonstrators demanding access to medications that could prolong or save their lives. Blacks and whites walked side by side -- an image of how in a country once separated by apartheid both races have come together to fight a common enemy. They marched behind a banner emblazoned with the words that have come to symbolize the struggle against the deadly disease in South Africa: "Pity" crossed out, with "Medication For All" printed beneath. </p><p>"It was amazing, there was incredible energy," the 26-year-old law student recalls. "South Africa is such an astounding place -- you can still feel the living history of the revolution taking place in their country. The people are incredibly politically literate, active and motivated." The activists' slogan, with its appeal to justice and rejection of pity, fired Kapczynski's imagination. "It's not about feeling bad and doing things out of guilt," she says. "People have a right to medication. They have a right to dignity and to have their own lives and the highest attainable standard of health." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/01/aids_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/01/aids_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free trade, closed talks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/20/ftaa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/20/ftaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/04/20/ftaa</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As authorities build a wall around the FTAA summit in Quebec City, anti-globalization protesters are hoping to infiltrate the discussion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quebec City is North America's only walled city. The enclave's magnificent stone walls were first built by the French, who were trying to keep the British out, and later by the Brits, who were trying to keep out Americans. Today, the Quebec government is building a new wall, 2.4 miles long and 10 feet high, to separate visiting diplomats from the thousands of anti-globalization protesters who are expected to converge on the city. </p><p>The diplomats are there to negotiate the sweeping <a target="new" href="http://www.ftaa-alca.org/ALCA_E.ASP"> Free Trade Area of the Americas</a> agreement. But to the protesters, Quebec City's new wall is a metaphor for the way the agreement has been negotiated -- with opponents walled out of largely secret negotiations. The FTAA, an idea first spawned at the Summit of the Americas in 1994, would dismantle protectionist policies that ban trade on certain products and services and would eliminate tariffs on goods imported and exported between member countries. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/04/20/ftaa/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/20/ftaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>War of words</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2001/04/12/china</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Chinese get what sounds like an apology, and President Bush gets a resolution that silences the right -- for now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the end, the resolution of the spy plane standoff hinged on semantics -- the use of language that would politically appease both Americans and Chinese, and keep from bruising either a sensitive superpower with a new president, or a rising Asian nation long attuned to slights to its pride and dignity. </p><p> U.S. Ambassador to China Joseph Prueher sent a letter Tuesday night to Chinese Foreign Minister Tang Jiaxuan expressing "sincere regret" over the loss of a Chinese pilot and stating that the U.S. is "very sorry" for entering Chinese airspace and making an emergency landing on Hainan Island "without verbal clearance." The missive also asked Beijing to "please convey to the Chinese people and to the family of pilot Wang Wei that we are very sorry for their loss." Beijing leaders responded positively to the letter, which provided it with a way out of an increasingly messy diplomatic crisis with the country that holds the linchpin to China's plans for economic growth. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/12/china_28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China breakthrough: Bush takes questions!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/11/china_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/11/china_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2001 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geraldine Ferraro]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/04/10/china</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Diplomacy sometimes takes a little longer than people would like," the president says. And the people who don't like it include many conservative allies.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After meeting with Jordan's King Abdullah II Tuesday, President Bush did something about the spy plane standoff with China he had until then refused to do: He answered reporters' questions about the crisis, as it entered Day 10. </p><p> "Diplomacy sometimes takes a little longer than people would like," Bush told reporters, in a press conference that featured no flashes of diplomatic or political acumen, but no flubs, either. </p><p> Bush's defense of diplomacy might have seemed a simple, Stuart Smalley-style affirmation, but it actually took some courage, in the face of mounting criticism of his cautious China policy from conservative allies. </p><p> Tuesday's other major China news involved an American political leader doing something that comes much more naturally for him than press conferences do for Bush: The Rev. Jesse Jackson offered to travel to China to negotiate the return of the 24 crew members being held against their will, pending a resolution of the stalemate between the U.S. and China. </p><p> The Bush administration is said to have given the Democratic leader a gentle brushoff. Though Jackson was no doubt eager to burnish his image after a love-child scandal forced him to take a leave from public life earlier this year (a leave that lasted only a weekend), he did successfully negotiate the release of American POWs during the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/04/11/china_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/04/11/china_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

