<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > David Rosen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/david_rosen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Has school disciplining gone too far?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Civil Liberties Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In institutions across the U.S., normal children's behavior is being treated as evidence of a psychiatric disorder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Brianna Pena, a 5-year-old, was told she could not return to her kindergarten classroom at her Bronx, NY, charter school until she was “psychiatrically cleared” to return by a medical professional.  It was her first day at a new school.  She didn’t know anyone and repeatedly cried, “Nobody cares about me!” School officials insist that Brianna kept “yelling and throwing chairs” during the incident.  Administrators placed her on a list of so-called <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/charter-schools-boot-2-troubled-kindergartners-article-1.1070199" target="_blank">“psychiatric suspensions.”</a></p><p>In Bartow, FL, Kiera Wilmot, a 16-year-old student was expelled from Bartow High School and arrested for conducting an unapproved chemistry experiment.  She combined some household chemicals in an 8-ounce water bottle and the top popped off, giving off a small explosion.  According to the school principal, Ron Pritchard, "she made a bad choice. ... She wanted to see what would happen [when the chemicals mixed] and was shocked by what it did.”  She was charged with possession of and discharging a weapon on <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/01/zero-tolerance-watch-teen-faces-felony-c" target="_blank">school property.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/has_school_disciplining_gone_too_far_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s new sex toy revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/everything_you_need_to_know_about_the_new_sexual_culture_in_america_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/everything_you_need_to_know_about_the_new_sexual_culture_in_america_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Toy Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50 Shades of Grey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. sales are skyrocketing, aided by $15 billion in annual revenue from online retailers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Xbiz, the adult entertainment industry trade association, held its 11th annual awards gala at the Los Angeles Century Plaza Hotel on January 11, 2013. Dubbed by industry insiders as the "Academy Awards of the sex industry,” the event was hosted by the porn star Tera Patrick. In attendance were such industry “celebrities” as James Deen (co-starring with Lindsay Lohan in <em>The Canyons</em>), Bollywood star Sunny Leone, <em>Hustler</em> publisher Larry Flynt, and Ron Jeremy, an industry stalwart.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> At the ceremony, LELO, a Swedish adult sex paraphernalia company), received the Pleasure Products Company of the Year award. Its products range from high-end vibrators to an assortment of intimate toys including cuffs, ties and blindfolds as well as pleasure enhancements like massage oils, candles and other products. In additional to selling in Europe, it operates in the U.S., Australia and Asia and Europe and had reported revenues of $6 million in 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/everything_you_need_to_know_about_the_new_sexual_culture_in_america_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/everything_you_need_to_know_about_the_new_sexual_culture_in_america_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney is spying on you!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/disney_is_spying_on_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/disney_is_spying_on_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disneyland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCTV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From CCTV cameras to RFID wristbands, retailers and major corporations are tracking your every movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><div>Are you planning to visit Disneyland anytime soon? If so, watch out when you are offered its latest marketing innovation, the MagicBand. When it's introduced later this year, this oh-so-cuddly wristband will be embedded with a radio frequency identification (RFID) microchip and be part of a system dubbed MyMagic+.  It will enable the company to monitor, track and analyze your every activity.</div><div> <p>A recent <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/07/business/media/at-disney-parks-a-bracelet-meant-to-build-loyalty-and-sales.html?_r=0" target="_blank">New York Times </a>exposé reveals how the giant entertainment conglomerate plans to employ some of the latest spy technologies to “customize” its operations. According to the <em>Times</em>, “Did you buy a balloon? What attractions did you ride and when? Did you shake Goofy’s hand, but snub Snow White? If you fully use MyMagic+, databases will be watching, allowing Disney to refine its offerings and customize its marketing messages." Sound innocent?</p> <p>Disney’s plan to implement customer tracking is just the latest revelation about an expanding program of personal surveillance enveloping ever-greater aspects of personal life, online and in the physical world.</p> <p>Sadly, most Americans do not know the true scope of the tracking and surveillance now taking place. Four simple questions need to be addressed: 1) What is happening to all the personal data being captured? 2) How long is it being retained? 3) To what extent is it being sold to third-party commercial vendors? 4) Is your “private,” personal data being provided to government law enforcement authorities?</p> <p>* * *</p> <p>Next time you're walking around a department store, keep in mind that you are being monitored and analyzed in two complementary ways. First, your in-store movements are being electronically tracked, recorded and analyzed; second, your data history is being captured, updated, sold, integrated with other database information and analyzed. The two dimensions of your 21st-century public “self,” your physical behavior and your digital communications, are now subject to nearly instantaneous and ceaseless monitoring.</p> <p>Corporations are expanding the scope of tracking with the use of two technologies, WSN (wireless sensor networks) and CCTV (closed-circuit television). WSN is a network of sensors within a large coverage area, like a mega-store. It is adaptable and flexible, capable of tracking cart movement and shelf inventory.</p> <p>In some of the most sophisticated outlets, wireless transmitters are embedded in shopping carts and in overhead sensors. These devices map how a customer moves through the store, where she stops to read the label or compare prices. Of special interest to retailers is the time spent in front of a display or kiosk, in a dressing room or the lavatory.</p> <p>Still another application of wireless transmitter usage involves a system developed by IBM, dubbed “data-talks-to-data.” Sophisticated sensors, what some call “electronic noses,” are being embedded in the walls of buildings such as airports to detect threats, alert security services and track a person carrying a suspicious substance. It’s only a matter of time before they are placed in dressing rooms to identify the perfume a shopper is wearing.</p> <p>CCTV systems are being increasingly used to track customers. The system of choice integrates a stationary PTZ (pan-tilt-zoom) camera with rotating and zooming functions and a sophisticated analytic software program. Cameras are strategically placed at the entry and exit of the store as well as at the loading-unloading areas. In addition, they are being installed above shelves, end caps, counters and in departments. Frequently, they are placed near costlier items like jewelry and electronic products.</p> <p>Video tracking helps map customer flow patterns, assess point-of-sale displays and purchasing habits. One company, Vizualize, sells “end-to-end solutions [that] track customer interaction times with products, store windows and point-of-purchase displays to measure their effectiveness in enticing shoppers to the store and conversion.”  The <a href="http://www.vizualize.net/products/track.html" target="_blank">company insists</a> that "shoppers [are] never recognized nor integrated to systems in a fashion that could identify [an] individual without their explicit permission.”</p> <p>Good old CCTV tracking is undergoing a makeover. The latest twist in retail tracking involves the use of spy cameras in store window mannequins. A recent exposé in BusinessWeek spotlighted “EyeSee,” sold by Italian mannequin maker Almax. It reports that individual mannequins cost $5,130 and five upscale retailers have deployed “a few dozen” of them; Almax would not divulge the companies using the devices. The article <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-11-19/bionic-mannequins-spy-on-shoppers-to-boost-luxury-sales" target="_blank">noted</a> that "bionic mannequins are spying on shoppers to boost luxury sales.”</p> <p>The story also points out that the “device has spurred shops to adjust window displays, store layouts and promotions to keep consumers walking in the door and spending.”  The camera system comes with sophisticated facial-recognition software that identifies key demographic elements like gender, race and age. In addition, the mannequin camera tracks how long a person lingers before a window display. Almax is now developing voice-recognition technology “to allow retailers to eavesdrop on what shoppers say about the mannequin’s attire.”</p> <p>Facial recognition technology (FTC) is the new frontier in video monitoring. It turns the object of surveillance into a subject, a distinct person, by filling out the subject’s selfhood with an endless universe of data. FTC functions in a variety of ways. First and foremost, it enables researchers to assess facial characteristics, thus to detect and recognize a specific face. For example, “smart” cameras are being integrated into digital signs to determine the demographic characteristics of a viewer (e.g., age, gender) and then present an appropriate, targeted advertisement. More sophisticated FTC programs claim they can identify a person’s mood or emotional status.  One company, SceneTap, promises to determine the demographics of <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/reports/facialrecognition/p115406commissionfacialrecognitiontechnologiesrpt.pdf" target="_blank">customers at bars and nightclubs.</a></p> <p>Pushing the envelope, NEC launched a <a href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2412146,00.asp" target="_blank">facial recognition system </a>in Japan that goes beyond gender and age. It supposedly can specify whether the shopper has been at the store before and how frequently he shops there. The program is called “NeoFace” and is leased at $800 per month.</p> <p>Facial recognition technology is morphing to the web. Facebook is employing facial-recognition technology, “tag suggestions," to assist in photo tagging; this app has been barred in Europe.</p> <p>Retailers are notorious for collecting information on their customers. Stores as different as Target and Domino’s Pizza work closely with product suppliers, especially major brands, to track what customers buy. Many of these companies build extensive database profiles of each purchaser. When someone buys a product, the customer is assigned an ID number that becomes part of the store’s tracking system. Detailed records are kept of all subsequent purchases. Additional information, often acquired from “data aggregators,” is often added to fill-out the customer profile.</p> <p>Data is gathered from credit card transactions, store discount cards and coupons, and even product returns. In addition, a product’s barcode information is captured during the purchase and integrated into a consumer’s profile. This tracking is ostensibly intended to better target coupons and other incentives to the appropriate customers like, for example, a pregnant woman receiving coupons for diapers and baby food.</p> <p>Even product returns are fodder for personal information tracking. National chains like the Children’s Place and Victoria’s Secret require a shopper to present a personal ID (e.g., driver’s license) when returning a product – and the ID is scanned, the data entered into a company’s tracking database. The purpose of such tracking is to ostensibly prevent what is known as “renting,” a fraud of buying an item to wear and return. According to the National Retail Federation, 62 percent of retailers, including major vendors like Home Depot and Target, <a href="http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/11/20/consumerwatch-stores-requiring-id-tracking-to-prevent-repeated-" target="_blank">now require IDs with returns.</a></p> <p>The tracking and profiling taking place in retail outlets is just one aspect of a widening digital communications web that is increasingly ensnaring ordinary Americans. The “web” consists of both government entities (federal and local) and private corporations (retail, online and telecom) that track, monitor and surveil everyone using inter-connected digital media. Most troubling, they are sharing the information, “data,” they collect.</p> <p>Plan to visit Disney World? You’ll be tracked. Pay with a credit card at your local grocery store, you’ll be tracked. Your car insurance company can track the speed you drive, linking your fees to a good driving record.</p> <p>Private-sector tracking that takes place in retail outlets, even the apparently innocuous mannequin cameras, is part of a much larger monitoring, information gathering and commodification effort now underway. In addition to retailers and entertainment resorts, the great digital data sucking now underway also includes companies that enable digital communications, like AT&amp;T and Verizon; that facilitate commercial transactions, like Visa and PayPal; and that collect or aggregate personal data, repackage it and offer it for sale, like Acxiom and LexisNexis.</p> <p>Together, these types of companies turn a person’s private digital life, as well as the person, into a commodity.  Where is the FTC when we really need it?</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/disney_is_spying_on_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/disney_is_spying_on_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The police know where you&#8217;re driving</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_police_know_where_youre_driving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_police_know_where_youre_driving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Kelly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Departments have already begun deploying Orwellian license-plate reading technologies across the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> A building at 55 Broadway, in lower Manhattan, is home to the Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center, the locus of the New York Police Department's massive intelligence-gathering activities. According to a 2011 estimate, the facility integrates not only some 1,000 NYPD cameras located in lower Manhattan and some 700 cameras in midtown, but an additional 2,000 private surveillance cameras owned by Wall Street firms. These cameras are principally focused on capturing license plate data. The center cost an estimated $150 million to <a href="http://www.counterpunch.org/2011/10/18/wall-street-firms-spy-on-protestors-in-tax-funded-center/">set up.</a></p><p>While Mayor Michael Bloomberg and NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly endlessly tout the value of Manhattan’s "ring of steel," modeled after the security infrastructure of London’s financial district, they reveal little as to its role tracking car traffic in the city.  Both back the department’s Domain Awareness System (DAS), which can track individuals or incidents (e.g., a suspicious package) through live video feeds from some 3,000 CCTV cameras, 2,600 radiation substances detectors, check license plate numbers, pull up crime reports and cross-check all information agains<a href="http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/how-privacy-america-went-virtually-extinct-just-decade">t criminal and terrorist databases.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_police_know_where_youre_driving/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_police_know_where_youre_driving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Brother invades our classrooms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/big_brother_invades_our_classrooms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/big_brother_invades_our_classrooms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children's Online Privacy Protection Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13033491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schools across the country are adopting frightening new methods to monitor their students in school and out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The digital tracking and surveillance of school-aged kids has been growing.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Much attention has been given to the phenomenon of corporate tracking of kids’ online activities, activities that violate the Children’s Online Privacy <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/ogc/coppa1.htm" target="_blank">Protection Act</a> (COPPA).  The law, originally adopted in 1998, requires Web sites aimed at kids to get parental consent befoSre gathering information about those users who are under 13 years.  Many companies, including a Disney subsidiary, have violated it. Corporate marketing interests, most notably Facebook, are fighting proposed revisions to COPPA.</p><p>A second front in the tracking of young people has gotten far less attention. Schools across the country are adopting a variety of different tools to monitor students both in school and outside school. Among these tools are RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags embedded in school ID cards, GPS tracking software in computers, and even CCTV video camera systems. According to school authorities, these tools are being adopted not to simply increase security, but to prevent truancy, cut down on theft and even improve students' eating habits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/big_brother_invades_our_classrooms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/08/big_brother_invades_our_classrooms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four ways your privacy is being invaded</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/four_ways_your_privacy_is_being_invaded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/four_ways_your_privacy_is_being_invaded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13007846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slowly but surely, government and telecommunications companies have forged a police-corporate surveillance complex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Americans' personal privacy is being crushed by the rise of a four-headed corporate-state surveillance system.  The four “heads” are: federal government agencies; state and local law enforcement entities; telecoms, web sites &amp; Internet “apps” companies; and private data aggregators (sometimes referred to as commercial data warehouses).</p><p>Conventional analysis treats these four domains of data gathering as separate and distinct; government agencies focus on security issues and corporate entities are concerned with commerce. Some overlap can be expected as, for example, in case of a terrorist attack or an online banking fraud.  In both cases, an actual crime occurred.</p><p>But what happens when the boundary separating or restricting corporate-state collaboration, e.g., an exceptional crime-fighting incident, erodes and becomes the taken-for-granted operating environment, the new normal?  Perhaps most troubling, what happens when the traditional safeguards offered by “watchdog” courts or regulatory organizations no longer seem to matter?  What does it say that the entities designed to protect personal privacy rights seem to have either been effectively “captured” or become toothless tigers?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/four_ways_your_privacy_is_being_invaded/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/four_ways_your_privacy_is_being_invaded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s darkening agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/googles_darkening_agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/googles_darkening_agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12924205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company's attitudes toward privacy have grown increasingly dismissive. Now some countries are taking notice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1999, Scott McNealy, the former head of Sun MicroSystems, reportedly declared, "You have zero privacy anyway....Get over it." He unintentionally let the proverbial cat out of the bag of the digital age.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a>In 2009, McNealy’s assessment was confirmed by Google’s CEO, Eric Schmidt. In an interview with NBC's Mario Bartiromo, he proclaimed, "If you have something that you don't want anyone to know maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place." Schmidt’s words have become Google’s new mantra. Welcome to 21st-century corporate morality.</p><p>Now, a decade-plus later, McNealy’s prophetic words have take on a far more sinister significance than he probably intended. They are increasingly becoming the operating assumption of the digital corporate state. Whether going online, using a PC, smartphone, tablet or digital TV, users can no longer assume they have any privacy. In fact, users should assume they have absolutely no privacy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/googles_darkening_agenda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/googles_darkening_agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
