<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Evan Ratliff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/evan_ratliff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 15:05:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Web users demand privacy, then give it up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/privacy_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/privacy_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/16/privacy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Internet companies track our every move, what to do about data privacy?  Do we need a comprehensive law or should individuals be responsible?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20051107/1721251.shtml">TechDirt</a>, a less-than-shocking illustration about Web users and our approach to privacy: We say we want it, but do little to obtain it. A <a href="http://www.out-law.com//default.aspx?page=9345">survey of privacy attitudes</a> in the U.K. found that 84 percent of Internet users claimed they would not divulge details of their income online. Later in the survey, the same group was asked to divulge their income data. Eighty-seven percent of them did so. Hello, cognitive dissonance! </p><p>It's worth noting that the survey was carried out by AOL, and the sample size was only 1,000 people, so skepticism of the methodology is warranted. Not to mention that there's no penalty for lying about your income in such cases, as I always do (I mean, why not aspire to a better life?). But the results don't seem far off what many other surveys have long established, e.g., that most of us will and do routinely <a href="http://www.unisys.com/about__unisys/news_a_events/04258650.htm">trade away</a> personal data for convenience or meager rewards. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/privacy_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/privacy_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rat-brain robot alters direction of human history &#8230; again!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/rat_brain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/rat_brain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/15/rat_brain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New robot, not such new science. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world of science and tech news is downright exuberant over the announcement of a robot controlled by the neurons of a rat brain. In case you missed it (and I don't see how you could have!), <a href="http://www.kevinwarwick.com/">Kevin Warwick</a>, a professor at the <a href="http://www.rdg.ac.uk/research/">University of Reading</a>, unveiled the <a>cute little creation</a> earlier this week. Gordon, as the would-be ratbot is known, follows the whims of 300,000 lab-grown rat neurons, whose signals are picked up by 60 electrodes and transmitted to Gordon via a Bluetooth connection. </p><p>You can watch little Gordon wander around, rodentlike, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17912_3-10017016-72.html">here</a> and <a href="http://multimedia.asiaone.com/Multimedia/News/Story/A1Multimedia20080815-4188.html">here</a>. </p><p>The dramatic discovery leads some to ask, is this the <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-17912_3-10017016-72.html?tag=bl">answer</a> to Alzheimer's and other memory disorders? (You may be surprised to find that the <a href="http://www.reading.ac.uk/about/newsandevents/releases/PR16530.asp">University of Reading press release</a> has already settled the question: "The key aim is that eventually this will lead to a better understanding of development and of diseases and disorders which affect the brain such as Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, stroke and brain injury.") </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/rat_brain/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/16/rat_brain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The grave new threat we face from music</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/15/stoned_on_music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/15/stoned_on_music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/15/stoned_on_music</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Binaural beats pumped into your headphones can cause you to experience sex- and drug-like ecstasy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art r" style="width: 160px"> <a href="http://iasos.com/audioclp/BabyListeningWithHeadphones.jpg"><img class='wp-image-10019240' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/08/story47.jpg' /></a>
<p class="credit"><a href="http://iasos.com/audioclp/BabyListeningWithHeadphones.jpg">Iasos</a></p>
</p><p>I don't want to alarm any Machinist readers, but it has come to my attention that there are kids out there getting high on musical arrangements. Talk show host and USA Today columnist Kim Komando is <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/kimkomando/2008-08-07-digital-drugs_N.htm?csp=34">on the case</a>, with a column thankfully being <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5544919">reprinted far and wide</a>. In sum, your children or other loved ones might, at this very moment, be wearing giant headphones and getting dangerously stoned on the freshest of <a href="http://i-doser.com/">binaural beats.</a> Per Komando's alert<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=5544919">: </a><br />
<blockquote> For binaural beats to work, you must use headphones. Different sounds are played in each ear. The sounds combine in your brain to create a new frequency. This frequency corresponds to brain wave frequencies. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/15/stoned_on_music/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/15/stoned_on_music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update: Cyberattacks against Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/cyberwar_georgia_update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/cyberwar_georgia_update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/14/cyberwar_georgia_update</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many experts think that the Russian government may not be directly involved.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding my post from Tuesday about the cyberwar situation in Georgia, more <a href="http://www.crn.com/security/210003769">skepticism is emerging</a> about the Russian government's involvement in the attacks, and its failure to take the more decisive action of unplugging the Georgians entirely. That ChannelWeb story mentions security expert Gadi Evron's posts over at CircleID, where <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/88116_internet_attacks_georgia">he asserts</a> that "it doesn't seem Internet infrastructure is directly attacked." Similarly, the folks at the Information Warfare Monitor <a href="http://infowar-monitor.net/">conclude</a>:<br />
<blockquote><strong>Active route hijacking by Russian hackers</strong>, redirecting traffic to Russian telecom operators. If confirmed it would suggest that Russia ISPs are capable of enforcing an information blockage against a "<a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/civilge-the-geo.html">cyber-locked</a>" Georgia.<strong> This now appears implausible.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/cyberwar_georgia_update/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/cyberwar_georgia_update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you losing your memory thanks to the Internet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/memory_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/memory_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/14/memory</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ability to continually look up information is changing how and what we remember.  But maybe that's not a bad thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does the Internet actually do to your memory? Over at the Britannica blog, University of Chicago sociologist James Evans has added another <a href="http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2008/08/research-web-more-consensus-less-diversity-at-least-so-far/">thoughtful entry</a> in an ongoing discussion of whether and how the Internet is changing the way we think. Writer Nicholas Carr launched the discussion in this month's Atlantic Monthly, with his pessimistic take on the topic, "<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">Is Google Making Us Stupid</a>?" </p><p>Although the debate prompted by Carr's piece has been <a href="http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2008/07/reading-in-the-open-ended-information-zone-called-cyberspacemy-reply-to-kevin-kelly/">wide ranging</a>, the general issue at hand is whether and how our time spent online, hopping from one site to the next, affects the way we read, the way we think and the way we research (although often the discussions seem to reduce to <a href="http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2008/07/time-to-prove-the-carr-thesis-wheres-the-science/">just the question of</a> reading online versus reading books). But I'm also interested in one aspect they touch on but don't explicitly address: the effect of the Web and gadget usage on how and what we remember. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/memory_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/14/memory_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How creepy is Google&#8217;s Street View?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/street_view/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/street_view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/13/street_view</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Privacy concerns still shadow Google's all-seeing mapping tool, but soon such worries will probably seem quaint. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since its launch a little over a year ago, <a href="http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/">Google Street View</a> has been the pseudo-comedy privacy scare that keeps on giving. Just in the past few weeks, we've been treated to such instant Street View classics as the <a href="http://j-walkblog.com/index.php?/weblog/posts/street_view_captures_house_fire/">house on fire</a> (prompting a commenter-driven <a href="http://digg.com/odd_stuff/Google_Street_View_Catches_House_on_Fire">rush</a> on Rock Master Scott &amp; the Dynamic Three jokes), the <a href="http://www.gearthblog.com/blog/archives/2008/08/marriage_proposal_in_street_view.html">wedding proposal</a> (with <a href="http://www.marrymeleslie.com/">audience participation</a>), and the <a href="http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23530849-details/Google%27s+Street+View+captures+the+moment+a+drunken+Aussie+keeled+over+outside+his+home/article.do">man sleeping one off</a> in front of his house (a close friend of his had just died, isn't that hilarious). These join iconic Street View bloopers like <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/06/20/eastreet120.xml">man climbing fence</a> and a bloated list of other occasionally funny or unnecessarily cruel finds. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/street_view/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/street_view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberwar rages on in Georgia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/cyberwar_georgia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/cyberwar_georgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/12/cyberwar_georgia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Government sites under attack from Russian hackers move to U.S.-based servers, including Atlanta's Tulip Systems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>(Updated below)</b> </p><p>Amid the obviously more serious <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/world/europe/13georgia.html?hp">real-word consequences</a> in the ongoing Russia-Georgia conflict, the parallel virtual battle has been <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/technology/13cyber.html?_r=1&amp;oref=slogin">garnering</a> <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/georgia/2539157/Georgia-Russia-conducting-cyber-war.html">a fair amount</a> of <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10014150-83.html?hhTest=1">attention</a>. In sum, Russian hackers have been assaulting and disabling a number of Georgia's government Web sites -- largely, its seems, by employing botnet-driven <a href="http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/tips/ST04-015.html">denial of service attacks</a> -- since the inception of the conflict. As always with this kind of cyberwarfare, it's difficult to sort out whether the Russian government is actively supporting the attacks, or just the tacit beneficiary of some of its gung-ho and computer-savvy citizens. As of a few minutes ago, the <a href="http://www.government.gov.ge/eng/">main government site</a> in Georgia remained down. There have been <a href="http://en.rian.ru/russia/20080810/115936419.html">reports of attacks</a> on Russian sites as well. Monday the <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121850756472932159.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">Wall Street Journal</a> cited investigators who claimed to have traced the attack to a notorious cybergang called the <a href="http://rbnexploit.blogspot.com/">Russian Business Network</a>, but Wired's Danger Room found <a href="http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/investigators-a.html">skeptics</a> of that assessment. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/cyberwar_georgia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/12/cyberwar_georgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyping the Chevy Volt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/volt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/volt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/11/volt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is GM setting a new record for vaporware peddling?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<div class="art c"> <img class='wp-image-10015982' src='http://media.salon.com/2008/08/story35.jpg' />
<p class="caption">Chevy Volt screenshot</p>
</p><p>Is General Motors setting a new record for vaporware peddling? Given that Farhad Manjoo opened up the Machinist to <a href="http://machinist.salon.com/feature/2008/07/02/smart_car/index.html">auto coverage</a> a few weeks ago, this seems fair game: Like me, you may have noticed during Olympic TV coverage the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ITuKHpWKlQ">nonstop GM commercials</a> touting the coming pinnacle of automobile evolution, the <a href="http://www.chevrolet.com/electriccar/">Chevy Volt</a>. (Is there any ad that doesn't run nonstop during the Olympics? What happened to our endemic advertising diversity?) Aiming to be the first commercially available plug-in hybrid, the Volt -- as the ads inform us -- will travel 40 miles without using a drop of gas. "That's an American revolution," it concludes. USA! USA! Let's all head out and buy one...in 2010. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/volt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/volt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cellphones on planes, take 60</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/cell_phones_on_planes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/cell_phones_on_planes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/machinist/blog/2008/08/11/cell_phones_on_planes</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal bill would ban yapping in-flight -- yet a new survey shows public support for in-air yakking is on the rise.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the tide turning for in-flight gabbing? At the end of last week, the Department of Transportation reignited the perennial cellphone-on-planes discussion with a <a href="http://www.dot.gov/affairs/bts3808.htm">survey</a> showing that Americans are surprisingly ambivalent on the question. The data can be carved several ways, but the general take-away is that only about 45 percent of people surveyed thought phones "definitely" or "probably" shouldn't be allowed in-flight. Younger folks, not surprisingly, were more open to the practice. </p><p>This comes on the heels of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee's approval of Rep. Peter DeFazio's, D-Ore., hilariously titled <a href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.5788:">"Halting Airplane Noise to Give Us Peace Act of 2008,"</a> which would -- under the assumption that the FAA will eventually lift its <a href= http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/cellonplanes.html>ban</a> on cellphones in flight, as the EU already <a href= http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7334372.stm>has</a> -- establish a blanket federal prohibition on "voice communications using a mobile communications device" on board any scheduled flight. The bill is now headed for a full vote in the House. Meanwhile, internationally, Dubai-based Emirates Airlines <a href= "http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travelnews/2505766/Emirates-presses-ahead-with-in-flight-mobiles.html">announced on Thursday</a> that it was moving ahead with fleet-wide plans to allow passengers to use their phones in-flight. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/cell_phones_on_planes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/11/cell_phones_on_planes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O say, ma, been laden forever!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/12/data_mining_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/12/data_mining_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2006/05/12/data_mining</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Working with your phone company, skilled NSA operatives are rounding up evil terrorists who speak Islamofascist jive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Memo: NSA headquarters, Fort Meade<br> Automated data mining analysis, transcript #HS48652-6<br> Target: Evan Ratliff<br> Communication: Domestic e-mail intercepts<br> Keyword extraction recommendation: Significant terror risk. Operations imminent. </p><p> From: eratliff@*********.com<br> To: samschaffer@*****.com </p><p> Yo, Schaffe! What's up?! How's life down South? Tr<b>ied</b> calling your <b>cell</b>, but you must have been out <b>hitting</b> the bars pretty <b>hard</b> last night. Did you check out that little home-style restaurant I told you about? The house specialty <b>is lam</b>b chop, OH SNAP!! You'll love it. </p><p> drink a PBR for me,<br> e </p><p> From: eratliff@*********.com <br> To: samschaffer@*****.com </p><p> How've you <b>been, lad? In</b> trouble with the wife again, sounds like! Don't worry, it'll <b>blow</b> over. Not much happening in <b>New York</b>, except this <b>bloody</b> cold weather. Luckily my grandma knitted me that <b>afghan</b> this Christ</B>mas. I'd never heard of an <b>afghan</b> before, it's like some kind of super war</B>m blanket. <b>Thank</b> frickin <b>God</b> too, since our radiator is <b>shot</b>. Man, every year I dream about buying a <b>big plot</b> of land down south, with a few blueberry <b>bushes</b> and a dog <b>rov</b>ing around the yard. Just quit <b>urban</b> life forever. Sounds like <b>Heaven</b> <b>right now</b>. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/05/12/data_mining_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/05/12/data_mining_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

