<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Fred Branfman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/fred_branfman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When Chomsky wept</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/17/when_chomsky_wept/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/17/when_chomsky_wept/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12938973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first met Noam Chomsky in Laos, where I showed him the devastating effects of U.S. air raids ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forty-two years ago I had an unusual experience. I became friendly with a guy named Noam Chomsky. I came to know him as a human being before becoming fully aware of his fame and the impact of his work. I have often thought of this experience since -- both because of the insights it gave me into him and, more important, the deep trouble in which our nation and world find themselves today. His foremost contribution for me has been his constant focus on how U.S. leaders treat so many of the world's population as "unpeople," either exploiting them economically or engaging in war-making, which has murdered, maimed or made homeless over 20 million people since the end of World War II (over 5 million in <a title="http://www.alternet.org/story/147281/5_million_iraqis_killed,_maimed,_tortured,_displaced_--_think_that_bothers_war_boosters_like_christopher_hitchens/" href="http://www.alternet.org/story/147281/5_million_iraqis_killed,_maimed,_tortured,_displaced_--_think_that_bothers_war_boosters_like_christopher_hitchens/" target="_blank">Iraq</a> and 16 million in Indochina according to official U.S. government statistics).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/17/when_chomsky_wept/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/17/when_chomsky_wept/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dangerous allure of Washington hero worship</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/the_dangerous_allure_of_washington_hero_worship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/the_dangerous_allure_of_washington_hero_worship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10103130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Projecting our wish to be safe on the general is making us less safe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"War is too important to be left to the generals," said George Clemenceau, French prime minister during World War I -- especially to former Gen. David Petraeus, the prime architect of American's militarized foreign policy. Like Wall Street's focus on boosting short-term profits at the expense of long-term economic health, Petraeus' short-term tactical focus on expanding the drone war and ground assassinations throughout the Muslim world is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/aulaqi-killing-reignites-debate-on-limits-of-executive-power/2011/09/30/gIQAx1bUAL_story.html">jeopardizing America's long-term strategic position</a>. Yet Petraeus' sorry record, <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/03/petraeus_projection/">as reviewed by Salon</a>, has largely escaped scrutiny.</p><p>Congress seems uninterested. During his confirmation hearings to be CIA director last March, most senators genuflected to Petraeus. Only a few dared ask whether as CIA director he might shade his Afghanistan reporting to hide his failures. When he assured them he wouldn't, they smiled gratefully. "Senators ... merely urged the war's commander to recite once more the reasons why we're fighting there," observed <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2288395/">Slate.</a> "None of them asked a single tough question."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/the_dangerous_allure_of_washington_hero_worship/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/the_dangerous_allure_of_washington_hero_worship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Petraeus projection: The CIA director&#039;s  record since the surge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/petraeus_projection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/petraeus_projection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hero worship hides the military failures of the CIA director's "global killing machine"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few issues are more important to America's future than reducing the threat of future terrorist attacks, which not only risk killing Americans but also provoking a U.S. government response that could destroy our democracy. As Bob Woodward has warned: "Another 9-11 ... could happen, and if it does, we will become a police state." It could thus be a matter of the survival of American freedom that the media, instead of continuing to simply record official claims of militants killed by ground and drone assassinations, also report on the compelling evidence that these killings are weakening our overall national security.</p><p>Congress, the mass media and public are overlooking evidence that the current U.S. "counter-terror strategy" of global assassination by drones and special operations commandoes, isn't working.&#160; No small part of the problem is the lack of critical thinking about former Gen. David Petraeus, perhaps the most important architect of this strategy, and now the director of the CIA.</p><p>This week's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/anwar-al-aulaqi-us-born-cleric-linked-to-al-qaeda-killed-yemen-says/2011/09/30/gIQAsoWO9K_story.html">assassination of Anwar al-Awlaki</a>, a U.S. citizen and Muslim cleric, alleged to have orchestrated attacks on Americans, will no doubt be touted as another victory for Petraeus.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/petraeus_projection/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/petraeus_projection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ted Koppel I knew</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/koppel_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/koppel_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/11/23/koppel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was a fine journalist and a decent man  but to stay atop journalism's establishment, even he had to make a deal with the devil.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ted Koppel's retirement in the midst of Plamegate focuses attention on the most pressing issue facing American journalism: its abdication of its responsibility to expose government wrongdoing and lies. It is critical to raise our sights above the minutiae of Plamegate -- what Miller, Cheney, Woodward, Libby, Sulzberger, Cooper, Rove, Russert, Novak and Downie said to each other and when -- to the real issue involved: how democracy is weakened when journalists trade access to high officials in return for direct or indirect support of governmental misdeeds. </p><p>The media is particularly critical to democracy at a time like today, when one party and ideology controls the executive, legislative and judicial branches. Without a media critical of government, America democracy simply ceases to exist -- as occurred when the Bush administration took this nation to war in Iraq by distorting the information it had about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/koppel_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/11/23/koppel_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Raging hormones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/05/12/teen_boys/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/05/12/teen_boys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2004 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2004/05/12/teen_boys</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a schizoid world of compulsory chastity and online orgies, how are teenage boys supposed to make sense of sex?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard Schiffer is not the first parent to be alarmed that his teenager was learning about sex from either sniggering peers or a deeply confused culture that veers between sexual repression and Internet "creampie" raunch. But he is one of the few to actually write a book for teenagers about sexuality. <a target href="http://www.howtobethebestlover.com/">"How to Be the Best Lover: A Guide for Teenage Boys"</a> describes how sex can be an ecstatic (and healthy) part of life. A former '60s commune member in Oregon, Schiffer is now -- like so many other boomer parents -- trying to find a middle way between the utopian, and sometimes wrenching, sexual experimentation of his youth and the increasingly puritanical ethos of the Bush era. </p><p>Schiffer, a wiry, intense, energetic 54-year-old, has three children and is the author of "First Love/Remembrances" and "How to Be a Family: The Operating Manual." He has worked as a midwife and a natural foods vendor. The idea for "How to Be the Best Lover" came to him in 2000, when he noticed his then 13-year-old son displaying clear signs of sexual awareness and development. On a camping trip, his son refused to go swimming and Schiffer writes, "At some point I realized that any movement might have given away the big hard-on" bulging from his son's lap. "Around this time," adds Schiffer, "porn sites started mysteriously appearing on my computer," he says. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/05/12/teen_boys/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/05/12/teen_boys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A soldier for peace</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/04/13/peacesoldier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/04/13/peacesoldier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2004 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2004/04/13/peacesoldier</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The John Kerry I knew during the Vietnam War was far from the radical portrayed by the Bush campaign. He was a courageous truth-teller -- and, caught in a new inferno, the country could use him again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Bush team routinely practices character assassination on a scale not seen since Richard Nixon, it seems safe to predict that it will soon resume its effort to smear John Kerry for his courageous opposition to the war in Vietnam. In fact, Republicans are striving mightily to exploit talks the young antiwar leader had with delegations from both sides of the war in Paris in 1970 as proof of his traitorous ways. The media, as eager as ever to accommodate the GOP attack dogs, is apparently putting the story in play. </p><p>This follows the tempest stirred up by conservative groups earlier this year over a photo of Kerry and Jane Fonda at a Vietnam antiwar rally. Though they did attend the same event, the photo -- which showed them in close proximity -- was doctored. And in truth, Kerry and "Hanoi Jane," as the right wing demonized the antiwar movie star, had almost nothing to do with each other during the war. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/04/13/peacesoldier/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/04/13/peacesoldier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice to Kerry: It&#8217;s all about heart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/03/12/kerry_25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/03/12/kerry_25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2004/03/12/kerry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not enough to be smarter than George W. Bush -- you've got to show some real feeling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having locked up the Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. John Kerry is programmed to spend virtually every waking hour between now and Nov. 2 campaigning or raising money. In the interest of electoral success, though, it would be far more valuable for him to take a long break, get in touch with his feelings on the key issues of our day and learn how to convey those feelings to the public. </p><p>The contrasting TV sound bites by Kerry and George W. Bush on same-sex marriage illustrate, almost painfully, why the challenger will need to dramatically improve his connection with voters on emotional issues if he is to win in November. On Feb. 24, the day he came out for a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage, Bush was portrayed with the usual TV set lighting in a beautiful room at the White House, speaking calmly and with decorum about his support for a constitutional amendment stipulating that marriage should only be between a man and a woman. Kerry, in an AP videotape shown on AOL, was caught between campaign appearances; he was grim and uncomfortable, and spoke irritably: </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/03/12/kerry_25/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/03/12/kerry_25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is therapy dead?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/01/05/firestone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/01/05/firestone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2004 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2004/01/05/firestone</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book argues that the decline in long-term psychotherapy -- along with our reliance on medication and quick fixes -- is a public health tragedy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the sharp rise in the use of antidepressant medications, and the lack of health insurance coverage for long-term talk therapy, the days when patients spent years on the couch getting analyzed seem almost quaint. Dr. Robert Firestone, the author of nine books and a practicing therapist for more than 40 years, believes that the decline in psychotherapy makes it virtually impossible for emotionally troubled individuals to get adequate treatment for their problems. He also believes that this decline deprives well-functioning individuals of information that could help them lead more rewarding lives and robs society of valuable knowledge that could reduce violence and the likelihood of war. </p><p> Medication and quick fixes are insufficient, Firestone says, because they help people avoid emotions and merely provide symptomatic relief. We can only reach our fullest potential for happiness, he argues, by learning to face and tolerate painful feelings, and doing so requires in-depth, time-consuming psychological work. </p><p> Salon spoke with Firestone recently at his office in Santa Barbara about his new book, "Creating a Life of Meaning and Compassion: The Wisdom of Psychotherapy," the prohibitive costs of long-term mental health care, the lifelong value of uncovering emotional trauma, and the reasons even healthy people can benefit from therapy. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/01/05/firestone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/01/05/firestone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secretary Rumsfeld resigns after Kay report, citing pledge to grandson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/04/rumsfeld_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/04/rumsfeld_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2003 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/10/04/rumsfeld</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jutting-jaw authority figure says viewing of "Liar, Liar" catalyzed shocking decision.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld resigned today, in the wake of a report by weapons inspector David Kay stating that the U.S. had found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The report, Rumsfeld said, "humiliated me by showing to the world that I have no regard whatsoever for the truth." To the stunned amazement of reporters at a press conference, Mr. Rumsfeld added that he had been lying consistently to the public since taking office, but that the Kay report was "the straw that broke the camel's back." Mr. Rumsfeld stated that "the Kay report shows definitively that I misled the American people when I repeatedly claimed we had evidence that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction that posed a serious enough threat to justify our invasion of Iraq." </p><p>Secretary Rumsfeld explained that his resignation was prompted by a promise to his grandson, who had just watched the movie "Liar, Liar," that he would stop lying for an entire day. "My grandson said that if Jim Carrey, an actor in a movie, could tell the truth for a whole day that I should be able to do so as secretary of defense in real life. He had tears in his eyes, and looked at me so earnestly that I agreed to his request without thinking through the consequences. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/10/04/rumsfeld_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/04/rumsfeld_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The neuropsychology of the playground</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/24/siegel_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/24/siegel_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2003/06/24/siegel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychiatrist Dan Siegel explains how understanding the complexities of your own brain chemistry can make you a better parent.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvard-trained psychiatrist Dan Siegel and his colleagues are inventing a new field of scientific inquiry, one that can teach us how to be better parents. The field, known as interpersonal neuropsychology, is based on the idea that interpersonal relationships and communication have a direct impact upon brain development, brain functioning and human behavior. Siegel and his colleagues say that understanding how the brain works can help people improve their relationships, child rearing and emotional life. </p><p>Siegel's new book, "Parenting From the Inside Out" (co-authored with Mary Hartzell), provides information about the latest research in brain development, but also gives clear, concrete examples of how parents can apply these findings to their own lives. </p><p>Salon caught up with Siegel at his Santa Monica, Calif., home, down the street from his office near UCLA, where he is an associate clinical professor at the Center for Culture, Brain, and Development. </p><p><b> Why do you call your book "Parenting From the Inside Out"?</b> </p><p>It was a phrase that emerged from an interpersonal neurobiology approach, but it basically just means that if you start from the inside, your outward behavior will follow. As parents, understanding ourselves and how the brain works can help us to repair communication and reestablish our relationship with our children. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/24/siegel_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/24/siegel_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Briefing for a descent into hell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/hell_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/hell_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2003 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/04/02/hell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A wide-eyed extraterrestrial is instructed about how a man named Bush became the most powerful leader on Earth -- and how he led the planet into chaos.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the Bush administration's war against Iraq is that so many otherwise sensible observers discuss it as if it were a rational decision about which reasonable people can disagree. To gain some needed perspective, it is useful to recall Doris Lessing's classic science fiction novel, "Briefing for a Descent Into Hell." </p><p> The book revolves around a group of beings from another planet who are sent to save Earth, known for its "aggressiveness and irrationality." They must save our beleaguered planet because they have learned what we have not: that everything is interconnected. They must save us to save themselves. During the "briefing," the beings are told about their mission, and then memories of their own home are erased from their consciousness -- because remembering the sane place they came from while living on Earth would drive them mad. </p><p> The following is what might occur if the Briefer from Lessing's novel were compelled to explain our planet's current crisis to one of the beings who has volunteered to help save it. The discussion begins after the being has spent several hours watching the war on satellite television. The innocent, sad-eyed extraterrestrial creature is filled with queries about this troubled place called Earth, so we will call him the Questioner. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/hell_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/04/02/hell_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Salon Interview: Daniel Ellsberg</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/19/ellsberg_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/19/ellsberg_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/11/19/ellsberg</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man who leaked the Pentagon Papers talks about why five American presidents lied about Vietnam -- and how to get the truth on Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In times of war, Americans tend to give the president the benefit of the doubt. They assume he's acting rationally, on the basis of access to classified information they can't know about. But in his new book "Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers," former Defense Department analyst Daniel Ellsberg demonstrates that such assumptions can be false. </p><p> "Secrets" describes, as no book has before, exactly how American leaders deceived the public about a war plan that they knew could not win in Vietnam -- even as they sent increasing numbers of soldiers to fight and die there. As the U.S. prepares for a war against Iraq whose outcome no one can foresee, many will ask if we're doomed to repeat this history of deception. Few people are more qualified to explore this question than Ellsberg, who risked prison in 1971 by leaking the Pentagon Papers, 7,000 pages of top-secret memoranda by Vietnam policymakers, to the New York Times. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/11/19/ellsberg_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/11/19/ellsberg_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An open letter to the leaders of the environmental movement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/05/letter_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/05/letter_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2002 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/09/05/letter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why you're losing the war to Bush and Cheney.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I feel deep shame when I look into the eyes of my grandchildren and think how much damage has been done to Planet Earth since I was their age." -- Jane Goodall, <a target="new" href="http://www.time.com/time/2002/greencentury/engoodall.html">"People Power,"</a> Time, Aug. 18, 2002 </p><p>"Standing in front of a blown-up photo of a tiny, purple, one-seat European car, Senator Trent Lott, the Republican leader, asserted, 'I don't want Americans to have to drive this car.'" -- <a target="new" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/13/politics/13CND-ENER.html">"Senate Rejects Plan to Stiffen Auto Mileage Standards,"</a> New York Times, March 13, 2002 </p><p>"President Bush distanced himself today from a report by his administration concluding that humans were to blame for far-reaching effects of global warming on the environment. 'I read the report put out by the bureaucracy,' he said." -- <a target="new" href="http://www.ieta.org/Library_Links/IETAEnvNews/June5_Bush.htm">"President Distances Himself From Global Warming Report,"</a> New York Times, June 4, 2002 </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/09/05/letter_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/05/letter_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wanted</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/kissinger/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/kissinger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Hitchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2001/05/18/kissinger</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Henry Kissinger isn't guilty of war crimes, no one is. A Vietnam War whistleblower on Christopher Hitchens' case against the former secretary of state.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It is the lack of (Albert Speer's) psychological and spiritual ballast and the ease with which he handles the terrifying technical and organizational machinery of our age which make this slight type go extremely far nowadays. This is their age; the Hitlers and Himmlers we may get rid of, but the Speers, whatever happens to this particular special man, will long be with us." <br /> -- London Observer, April 9, 1944 </p><p> "The attack of bombardment, by whatever means, of towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings which are undefended is prohibited." <br />-- Article 25, The Hague Convention, 1907 </p><p> Henry Kissinger was a lightning rod for Vietnam War opponents from 1969 to 1975, when he served as national security advisor and secretary of state to Presidents Nixon and Ford. A quarter century after Kissinger left public service, the United States is still picking at the scars of Vietnam and grappling with the global resentments sparked by his realpolitik policies. And yet, despite a whiff of ignominy that still clings to him, Kissinger has grown jowly and prosperous off his connections and consulting services, and is feted in the most exclusive salons of Manhattan and Washington. His guttural pronouncements can be heard whenever there's a global crisis that needs explanation. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/kissinger/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/18/kissinger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Earth in the balance, indeed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/gore_61/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/gore_61/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/11/30/gore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Al Gore searches his soul, he can come back in four years and lead.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>"The environmental crisis (leads me to) conclude that I have not gone nearly far enough. The time has long since come to take more political risks ... We must make the rescue of the environment the central organizing principle for civilization ... We can believe in (the) future and work to preserve it, or we can whirl blindly on, behaving as if one day there will be no children to inherit our legacy. The choice is ours; the earth is in the balance." </p><p> <b></b><a href="/directory/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore,</a> "Earth in the Balance"</i></b> </p><p> Dear Vice President Gore, </p><p> Although you are still committed to winning this election, the time may come sooner than you wish to concede. If so, concession could be a blessing in disguise, if you follow it with a campaign to take the White House in 2004 with a popular mandate for the environmentalism you once espoused, but abandoned in this election. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/gore_61/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/30/gore_61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The drug war is a dismal failure&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/18/maher_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/18/maher_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2000 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/08/18/maher</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bill Maher calls for legalization, and says parents should drug-test their kids if they want to. A talk with the man who defines politically incorrect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Maher, host of the ABC show "Politically Incorrect," might be the most politically committed and articulate comedian since Dick Gregory. He is most passionate about campaign finance reform and ending the drug war, delivering major speeches on each subject at the Los Angeles Shadow Convention. </p><p>The passion swirling around the drug issue was the major surprise of the three-day Shadow Convention. The first day was devoted to reducing poverty, the third to campaign finance reform. But it was second day, devoted to calling for an end to the drug war, that created the most excitement. </p><p>Politicians like Jesse Jackson, Reps. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y. and Maxine Waters, D-Calif., plus California Republican Rep. Tom Campbell spoke to a packed and emotional audience about the costs of the war in human terms. </p><p>But Maher may well be the nation's most visible proponent for ending the drug war. He makes his case primarily on libertarian grounds, arguing that government has no right to regulate what goes on "inside people's heads." But this libertarian also feels strongly that parents should actively restrict their children's ability to use drugs, even to the point of permitting mandatory drug-testing in the schools. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/18/maher_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/18/maher_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where the New Democrats went wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/hart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/hart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2000 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/08/15/hart</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gary Hart says Clinton and Gore abandoned their base to expand the party, but says he'll support Gore anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado Sen. Gary Hart was the original New Democrat when he ran for the party's presidential nomination in 1984 against Walter Mondale. Hart was ahead of his time in another way: He got derailed by a 1987 sex scandal, his affair with model Donna Rice, which would later seem tame in comparison with the Monica Lewinsky drama. </p><p>Hart spoke to the Shadow Convention on Los Angeles this week about how the new New Democrats lost their bearings. He told Salon that, despite some reservations, he's supporting Al Gore and says, "The Democratic Party is not beyond redemption. </p><p><b>You were seen as the original New Democrat in 1984. What were you about, and how did it differ from the Clinton-Gore version of "New Democrats"?</b> </p><p>Our goal was to move the party forward without compromising its principles. These guys have gained power, but I'm not sure they maintained the principles. </p><p>What I had in mind was to expand the party beyond a shrinking New Deal base of basically organized labor, some minorities and old traditional Democrats. It wasn't to abandon those people, by any means. But it was somehow to appeal to young people and independent voters. I believed that there was an emerging new economy. We sought to capture people who understood that the economy of America was shifting away from processing raw materials into manufactured goods, and towards information technologies, communications and so forth. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/hart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/16/hart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A dangerous family&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/15/vidal_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/15/vidal_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2000 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/08/15/vidal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gore Vidal talks about Cousin Al, the evils of corporate America and why he's supporting Ralph Nader.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone could claim to be the intellectual godfather of the Shadow Convention, the organized uprisings of discontent held parallel to both party gatherings this summer, it is Gore Vidal. When he began writing 30 years ago that America had only one corporate party with Republican and Democratic wings, it was heresy. Today it is the conventional wisdom not only at the Shadow Convention, but in the Green and Reform parties as well. </p><p>Throughout Vidal's long career as a novelist and essayist, he has been a social critic and periodic activist. He made a mostly symbolic run for one of California's U.S. Senate seats in 1982, but since then has stayed out of electoral politics. On Monday he addressed the Shadow Convention, and Salon caught up with him to discuss this summer's two-party drama. </p><p>Though related to Vice President Al Gore on his mother's side, Vidal says he'll vote for Ralph Nader, and tells Salon why. </p><p><b>You're related to Al Gore? </p><p></b>Actually, he's related to me. </p><p><b>How? </p><p></b>Well, he's a cousin, a blood cousin. And I have actually never met him, although members of the family have tried to arrange meetings and I've talked to his people. But as I repeatedly say, although I am probably resigned to Nader, in the long run Gore is thicker than Nader. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/15/vidal_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/15/vidal_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Living in shimmering disequilibrium</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/eowilson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/eowilson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/04/22/eowilson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pulitzer Prize-winning author calls for spiritualizing the environmental movement as Earth endures the greatest mass extinction in 65 million years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>E</b>dward O. Wilson, born in 1929, began his career as a scientist and while still young became a tenured professor at Harvard specializing in myrmecology, the study of ants and their social systems. He was awarded the National Medal of Science by President Jimmy Carter in 1977, and he has won the Pulitzer Prize twice -- for his books "On Human Nature" and "The Ants." Over the years, Wilson has achieved the unusual status of unofficial societal wise man, an elder consulted on a wide variety of human affairs.</p><p>Wilson's belief that the hope of humanity lies in traditional religionists adopting more science and environmentalists appealing more to humankind's spiritual impulses  comes at a crucial moment for the environmental movement. The hard truth is that the condition of the environment is far worse on Earth Day 2000 than it was on the first Earth Day in 1970.</p><p>But it is Wilson's willingness to venture into public policy and to apply the insights of science to a wide variety of human affairs that has brought him the most public attention. He has played a seminal role in alerting policymakers and the public to the crisis of declining biodiversity. Arguing that humanity is living through the greatest mass extinction of plant and animal species in 65 million years, he has done perhaps more than any other single person to spur action to preserve biodiversity around the planet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/eowilson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/22/eowilson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A cooler head prevails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/16/guru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/16/guru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/1999/11/16/guru</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Psychologist Robert Firestone rejects the quick fix for bad marriage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>M</b>arriage counseling is a growth industry in which the quick-fix expert reigns supreme.  John Gray, of Mars and Venus fame, repairs marriages on Oprah. The Rev. Jesse Jackson, in private performance of therapeutic miracles, helps patch up the first marriage. In cozy offices and giant workshops around the country, couples rage before couples therapists who chant "I hear how much you love one another," often to no apparent effect. Spouses share feelings, listen, repeat what they hear and pledge to continue the process until next time.</p><p>And yet.</p><p>Divorce is a growth industry, in which the weapons spouses use against each other -- <a href="/mwt/feature/1999/10/25/restraining_orders/index.html">restraining orders,</a> allegations of abuse -- have become more varied and more extreme. Quick fixes fail to produce lifelong happiness, and the stats show not a dent for our earnest efforts at "active listening."</p><p>So why, exactly, do people continue to get married, to invest in the fantasy of happily ever after? Is it the pastel spell cast by the special wedding edition of "Martha Stewart Living"? An abiding belief in Tom and Nicole, nifty, go-go role models for the perfect marriage?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/16/guru/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/16/guru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
