<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Greg Villepique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/greg_villepique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Castration: An Abbreviated History of Western Manhood&#8221; by Gary Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/13/taylor_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/13/taylor_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2000 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/12/13/taylor</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at eunuchs through the ages offers a provocative take on what it means to be a man.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the pillars of Freudian theory is the castration complex -- boys' unconscious fear that their fathers will chop off their penises, girls' unconscious anxiety that they once had penises that were chopped off. Which leaves everyone fixated on the phallus (or at least on Freud). But in "Castration: An Abbreviated History of Western Manhood," Shakespeare scholar Gary Taylor surveys Western culture through the ages and responds: balls. </p><p>This dense, scholarly yet thoroughly entertaining book examines the uses of castration -- a word which, before Freud, never meant removal of the penis, only the testicles -- along with thousands of years' worth of popular attitudes about male genitals. Taylor -- who gained notoriety for arguing in 1985 that a ditty titled "Shall I die?" was written by Shakespeare -- posits that understanding what it means to be biologically unmanned is an excellent way to understand what it means to be a man. You don't need to be enthusiastic about this thesis -- or even to be male -- to find "Castration" terrific reading. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/13/taylor_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/13/taylor_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Upside Down&#8221; by Eduardo Galeano</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/galeano/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/galeano/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/10/12/galeano</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of "Memory of Fire" delivers a scathing, mischievous indictment of North America's hypocrisy and consumer culture.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking of voting for <a href="/directory/topics/ralph_nader/index.html">Ralph Nader</a> but wondering what the point is beyond keeping your conscience clean? To galvanize your disgust with the Establishment, you could do no better than to read "Upside Down: A Primer for the Looking-Glass World," Eduardo Galeano's ferocious, poetic, mischievous and chilling survey of political and economic systems of control around the world. The eminent Uruguayan author's anecdotes and parables address globally rampant pollution, poverty, vice and violence; the ever vaster gap between the powerful and powerless; and, above all, the tortuous public rhetoric that fails to disguise governmental and corporate culpability for these crises. </p><p>"Twin totalitarianisms plague the world," Galeano writes balefully, "the dictatorships of consumer society and obligatory injustice." Morality and memory have been displaced by misery and the palliative of TV: </p><p>
<blockquote>Consumer culture, a culture of disconnectedness, trains us to believe things just happen. Incapable of recalling its origins, the present paints the future as a repetition of itself; tomorrow is just another name for today. The unequal organization of the world, which beggars the human condition, is part of eternity, and injustice is a fact of life we have no choice but to accept.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/galeano/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/12/galeano/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/31/sutin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/31/sutin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/08/31/sutin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A biography of the spooky, sex- and drug-addled egomaniac who became an icon to generations of wannabe occultists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonfiction <br> Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley <br> by Lawrence Sutin <br> St. Martin's Press, 496 pages </p><p>Among the most basic human urges is the hankering to believe in a supernatural order that will clear up -- or justify -- our bafflement at the cosmos. A sane adult, of course, doesn't generally require that he or she be a central figure in that supernatural order. Which is to say that most people, thankfully, do not grow up to be Aleister Crowley. </p><p>Creepy Crowley is the grand old man of 20th century pop occultism. That's his glum bald head on the cover of the Beatles' "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band" (top row, second from left); it was his Scottish manor that Jimmy Page bought during the heyday of Led Zeppelin's obsession with magic and mysticism; shelves of his works can be found in those stinky occult bookstores where a certain species of moody adolescent shops for tarot cards, candles and witchy jewelry. Lawrence Sutin's "Do What Thou Wilt: A Life of Aleister Crowley" explains the dubious accomplishments -- as poet, novelist, essayist and, um, magus -- that have made this sexually and pharmaceutically voracious English spiritualist a fuzzy icon to generations of wannabe occultists. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/31/sutin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/31/sutin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Dragon Syndicates&#8221; by Martin Booth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/02/booth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/02/booth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/08/02/booth</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blood-soaked history of the Chinese secret societies that started the heroin trade and invented the "death by myriad swords."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A small band of Chinese men in matching red pajamas barks out cryptic twaddle about avenging the monks of the Shaolin Temple, then nimble feet and sharpened metal stars fly through the air and another small band of Chinese men, in matching black pajamas, is killed with much gore and eloquent shrieking. A scene from a Hong Kong martial arts movie? Well, yes. But until I read the British novelist and historian Martin Booth's "The Dragon Syndicates: The Global Phenomenon of the Triads," I didn't know where the vocabulary of those movies came from. Booth's literate, action-packed overview of Chinese secret societies paints a scary picture of ritualism and thuggery in modern China and worldwide, and incidentally answers most of my questions about Bruce Lee films and the arcane skits on <a href="/june97/sharps/sharps970617.html ">Wu-Tang Clan records.</a> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/08/02/booth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/08/02/booth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Collapse: When Buildings Fall Down&#8221; by Phillip Wearne</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/wearne/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/wearne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/07/13/wearne</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the hair-raising details of how and why man-made structures come tumbling to earth!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>ome of the racier moments of my uneventful childhood occurred in the elementary school library, where we mayhem-hungry 8-year-old boys would often gather to watch an extraordinary little videotape of the 1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse in Washington state. Under the fairly ordinary force of a high wind, the thin, graceful suspension bridge bucked and writhed like an eel; then the suspension cables snapped and deranged sections of the span ripped themselves free and plunged into the water below. To us, it was as thrilling and mysterious as pornography. </p><p>The Tacoma Narrows disaster is one of many engineering fiascoes analyzed by Phillip Wearne in "Collapse: When Buildings Fall Down," the companion book to a Learning Channel TV series of the same name. On the surface, the book appeals directly to the mayhem-hungry 8-year-old in all of us. But what it's really about is the technical nitty-gritty of structures of all kinds -- how they're designed, built and inspected, and how oversights at any stage of the process can have terrible consequences. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/wearne/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/07/13/wearne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Emotionally Weird&#8221; by Kate Atkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/29/atkinson_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/29/atkinson_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2000 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/06/29/atkinson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stories proliferate in a giddy, madcap novel crammed with stoner students, crazy professors and long-kept family secrets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t takes a careful writer to create carefree comedy, to balance the absurd and the believable, the earnest and the inane, so that the loopiness that farce demands never seems merely random. Kate Atkinson -- whose debut, <a href="/30dec1995/sneakpeeks/sneakpeeks2.html">"Behind the Scenes at the Museum,"</a> won Britain's Whitbread Prize five years ago -- writes with energetic intelligence, but her sense of balance often goes awry. Her third novel, "Emotionally Weird," boasts a vivid atmosphere and some very funny business, but it's successful neither as screwball comedy nor as a serious novel about its heroine's quest for identity. There's almost certainly a delightful story buried here somewhere, but it may demand more indulgence than even the most optimistic reader is likely to give it. </p><p>In the novel's framing story, 21-year-old Effie is sharing a storm-swept house on a barren Scottish island with her mother, Nora. They endure their isolation by telling stories from their lives. Effie's understandably curious to know where she came from -- she knows no father and Nora claims to be a virgin. Nora's tale clears up the mystery, but not until the end of the book, and in the interim Effie does nearly all the talking. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/29/atkinson_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/29/atkinson_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Corman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/corman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/corman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edgar Allan Poe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2000/06/13/corman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The King of B movies became an industry giant by keeping budgets lean, and his films rich with breasts, bikers and blood.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here's a scene in the 1960 film "Little Shop of Horrors" in which the bloodthirsty talking plant, Audrey Junior, takes about five seconds to hypnotize the hapless flower-shop assistant, Seymour Krelboin, who's a tad squeamish about supplying the plant's dinner again: "Krelboin! Turn around! Close your eyes. You are asleep. Open your eyes. Now you will do as I say." Roger Corman's method as a director and producer has often seemed about as delicate as Audrey Junior's -- logic and continuity tend to go by the board in Corman's drive to achieve maximum eventfulness. Still, he's always managed to entertain the masses, devoting a long career to answering their cry of "Feed me!" </p><p>Corman's been known for several decades as "the King of the B's," as in B-movies -- the cinematic world of papier-mbchi aliens, mad sorcerers, car chases, exploding heads and topless outdoor catfights. But zoom in on the ceremonies for the 1974 Academy Awards: <a href="/people/bc/1999/10/19/coppola/index.html">Francis Ford Coppola</a> won Oscars for best picture, director and adapted screenplay for "The Godfather Part II," <a href="/ent/col/srag/2000/06/01/towne/">Robert Towne</a> won the best original screenplay award for "Chinatown," and Jack Nicholson, Talia Shire and Diane Ladd were among the acting nominees. What they had in common was that they'd all worked for Roger Corman as wet-eared novices in the '50s and '60s. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/corman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/13/corman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Me Talk Pretty One Day&#8221; by David Sedaris</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/sedaris_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/sedaris_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2000 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/06/09/sedaris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In another sidesplitting collection, the author writes about his foulmouthed brother, his hopeless French and his brief career as a speed-freak performance artist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b> used to go to work across the street from a lovely park in midtown Manhattan. On sunny afternoons, without fail, a small troop of hapless interns with HBO brooches pinned to their polo shirts would fan out over the grounds, fling themselves into the paths of innocent pedestrians and bubble, "Hi! Do you like comedy?" I never actually saw anybody take a swing at one of them, but they were cruising for it. Obviously some audience-gaffing specialist had determined that nobody would say no, as if the real question were "Do you like being happy?" I like to think that if one of the saps from HBO had accosted David Sedaris -- the only professional comic, if you can call him that, who consistently makes me happy -- he might have replied, slowly and with wide eyes, "Do <i>you</i> like tragedy?" </p><p>"Me Talk Pretty One Day," Sedaris' new collection of essays, fits loosely into the tradition pioneered by those literary wags of an earlier era, like S.J. Perelman and Robert Benchley, who spun their random observations into epically loopy fantasias. Though Sedaris does contribute to the New Yorker, he is not, like his famed forebears, an urbane cocktail-party curmudgeon. He, too, examines the ridiculousness of those around him, but he does it with affectionate curiosity and not a jot of shame about his own mischievous weirdness; he comes across as equal parts Perelman and Pee-wee Herman. In a time when bestselling "humorous" books by the likes of Tim Allen and Paul Reiser leave one's sides intact, Sedaris is a prime candidate for funniest writer alive. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/sedaris_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/09/sedaris_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cute, Quaint, Hungry and Romantic: The Aesthetics of Consumerism&#8221; by Daniel Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/26/harris_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/26/harris_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/04/26/harris</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the malice of a gifted comic, an angry author argues that our "personal" tastes are something we were sold by advertising.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen writers pontificate about how some cultural artifact affects "us," they generally mean their audience, or at least themselves. <a href="/it/feature/1998/11/09feature.html">Daniel Harris</a> takes a very different approach in "Cute, Quaint, Hungry and Romantic," his jeremiad (his own word) against American consumer culture: He discusses the ways that product pluggers' visions strike an "us" best characterized as nobody who could begin to understand the argument of his book -- if in fact "we" exist at all. To Harris, "we" are a blank-minded mob of automatons who not only strive to keep up with the Joneses but require advertisers to tell us who the Joneses are.</p><p>Harris' baleful premise is that popular notions of "cuteness," "quaintness," "zaniness," "naturalness," "cleanness" and so on are artificial fabrications of the capitalist machine. What we think of as our unique tastes are rooted in how we are sold what we buy; movies, TV and magazines shape our ideals. Take fashion photography, which, like most advertising, Harris finds "pornographic" in its soulless appeal:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/26/harris_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/26/harris_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Circumcision&#8221; by David L. Gollaher</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/22/gollaher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/22/gollaher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/02/22/gollaher</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A physician argues the case against lopping it off.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen Britain launched its national health-care program after the<br />
Second World War, doctors and politicians scrutinized common<br />
medical procedures in order to determine which ones the<br />
government should pay for. Circumcision had been in vogue<br />
there, as in the United States, for several decades, but in the<br />
absence of solid evidence for its health benefits, the postwar<br />
English government opted not to pay for it, and only a small<br />
percentage of British boys who are not Jewish or Muslim have<br />
undergone the procedure since. But in America, 50 years on,<br />
one of the first quandaries faced by the parents of a newborn<br />
boy remains whether to hack off a chunk of his penis. The<br />
American Pediatric Association has waffled on the subject for<br />
the past few decades. Doctors tend to advise it and insurance<br />
companies cover it. Thus, more than 60 percent of American<br />
foreskins are left on the cutting-room floor.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/22/gollaher/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/22/gollaher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Bowie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/bowie_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/bowie_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/2000/01/25/bowie</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the master of self-reinvention -- from Ziggy Stardust to the Thin White Duke to Normal David -- he became the most influential rock star of the post-Beatles era.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen I was a kid, my favorite record was David Bowie's greatest-hits collection "ChangesOneBowie." It wasn't just that he was English, or that he used words like "ass" and "bitch" and, well, "leper messiah," or that when I played the record loud for my best friend, Tommy, he got the same worried look on his face that my mother did. All of these things were cool enough, but they represented a deeper attraction: David Bowie embodied the threat and thrill of everything not suburban, that is, everything I aspired to from the time I realized all I had to do was grow up and get out.</p><p>In England, Bowie was a big enough star to serve this purpose for everyone. The sharpest spearhead of glam rock, he catalyzed the British punk revolution of 1976 -- legend has it that one or two future Sex Pistols made off with the P.A. system Bowie used at his last Ziggy Stardust show, in 1973, which is too useful an anecdote to doubt. On this side of the Atlantic, Bowie hardly flopped, but in '70s American culture he remained a cult figure. Unequivocal worldwide superstardom didn't come to him until the calculated-<wbr>to-<wbr>be-<wbr>a-<wbr>smash-<wbr>hit album "Let's Dance," in 1983, three years after the last in a decade-long string of records that, it seems surprisingly safe to say, forms the most consistently challenging and unpredictable oeuvre of any performer in rock music. He's easily the most influential rock star of the post-Beatles era, given the number of whole pop movements, from British punk to Britpop, goth to hair metal, industrial to electronica, that owe him enormous and obvious debts.</p>
<p>Many rock purists wish it weren't so, because much of that influence is nonmusical. Bowie's main contribution to the rock vernacular was a disregard for the rock vernacular. He was an actor who impersonated a pop star, singing through unlikely characters and skewed narrative stances, never resorting to that generically American accent that used to define international rock, always creating an image rather than revealing himself. When Bowie is described as a chameleon -- as he invariably is -- it's a description not just of his musical style-hopping, but of his personality, for in his prime, each in his procession of public personas tended to be at odds with the last, and if the Bowie presented on an album was ever voicing the "real" Bowie's sentiments, you had to guess at where.</p>
<p>Bowie plucked ideas from everyone, but he was never a mere copyist. He married Jean Genet to the Yardbirds, Bertolt Brecht to Jacques Brel; he latched himself onto Lou Reed and Iggy Pop and absorbed their refusal to compromise with the mainstream. He crafted irresistible sing-alongs about despair, and mustered his most passionate love song about the Iron Curtain. In Bowie's world, nothing was safe or simple, and by refusing to stay put, standing for nothing but change, he allowed his creativity and his mystique to feed off each other and flourish.</p>
<p>Bowie was born David Jones in 1947 and grew up in a bleak suburb of postwar London. About his youth, the most salient fact is that a friend once punched him in the eye, permanently dilating one pupil and thereafter giving his eyes the inimitably cool appearance of being two different colors. Between 1964, when he made his first record with an R&B combo called the King Bees, and 1969, when he hit the pop charts, he made decreasingly futile stabs at mod pop, music-hall whimsy, Kinks-derived satire and Dylanesque hippie balladeering. Alarmingly, he also practiced mime on the side.</p>
<p>It was in his hippie guise that he emitted the watershed 1969 single "Space Oddity," which tells the story of an astronaut, Major Tom, who blasts off into space and decides not to return to Earth. As both writer and singer, the shorthand with which Bowie alternates the voices of "Ground Control" and Major Tom is masterful: "'Tell my wife I love her very much'/'She knows.'" Out of the blue, Bowie seized on the themes of alienation, distance and outer space as a metaphor for inner space that have recurred in his writing ever since. But "Space Oddity" was his only song to make the grade for another two years. His odd 1970 album of lumbering hard rock and Nietzschean pomposity, "The Man Who Sold the World," is notable mostly for its endearing cover, on which Bowie posed as a reclining odalisque in a silk dress, his extravagantly long curls nearly brushing his bony cleavage.</p>
<p>Bowie got married in 1970 to a flamboyant London scenester named Angela Barnet, and the couple had a son, Zowie, the next year while Bowie put together "Hunky Dory." Seemingly all at once, he developed both a sense of humor and a consistently accessible pop sense. About half the album is either obscurantist or cutesy, but there are enough gems to make it the first indispensable Bowie album. "Changes" is his theme song by default, and it's pretty brash for someone who'd had only moderate success in the past: "Oh look out, all you rock 'n' rollers!" "Oh! You Pretty Things" was a warm-up for the next and boldest step of Bowie's career, proclaiming a common bond between conquering aliens and the antsy teenagers of the world. And Bowie's Velvet Underground tribute, "Queen Bitch," sounded the first blast of the raunched-up, homoerotic bubble-gum tease that was about to change his fortunes.</p>
<p>Around the time Bowie was making "Hunky Dory," England was seduced by Marc Bolan, aka T. Rex. Having started as an airy folkie prattling about magical lands, Bolan went electric, put a little makeup on, exchanged goofiness for outright lyrical delirium ("You're built like a car, you've got a hubcap diamond star halo") and almost single-handedly brought simple three-chord fun and sex back to a British music scene mired in so-called progressive rock, blues jams and earnestness. As Roy Carr and Charles Shaar Murray spelled out in their fabulous 1981 book "Bowie: An Illustrated Record," "glam rock" depended on several post-Wildean propositions: among them, that aesthetics are more important than politics; that a performer should put on a performance, not just show up stoned in a macrami vest and sandals; that earnestness equals lack of imagination; that art is artificiality. Woodstock-era rockers were hippies just like their audience, but glam rockers reveled in the trappings of stardom. (Todd Haynes' surreal film <a href="/ent/movies/reviews/1998/11/06reviewb.html">"Velvet Goldmine,"</a> which rewrote history blatantly and was foolishly disparaged by critics for its inaccuracy, conveyed -- and embodied -- the spirit of glam brilliantly.) Bowie was already no stranger to self-reinvention, and he recognized his historical moment.</p>
<p>So, at the beginning of 1972, he got a short, spiky haircut, donned a spacey cat suit and platform boots, let slip to an interviewer that he was bisexual, recorded the sublime single "Starman" and became Ziggy Stardust, the beloved and doomed ultimate rock star. Real life and fiction merged on "The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars," released barely six months after "Hunky Dory." The album's vague plot goes approximately thus: In a doomed world -- "News had just come over, we had five years left to cry in" -- young Ziggy listens to the radio and hears a "starman" delivering the cosmic gospel, "Let all the children boogie." He takes heed and decides, "I could make a transformation as a rock 'n' roll star." (After all, he muses, "I could do with the money/I'm so wiped out with things as they are.") Though we're told elliptically of Ziggy's success, flameout ("Ziggy sucked up into his mind") and "Rock 'n' Roll Suicide," Bowie jumbles up the points of view and star metaphors until we can't tell the difference between alien and human, performer and fan, future and present, Ziggy and Bowie. It's not only a winning batch of songs with echoes of Bolan, the Beatles and Reed, but also a smart pop-art statement about itself and one of the few "concept albums" truly worthy of the term.</p>
<p>At the start of the Ziggy experiment, Bowie began traveling around in limos with an ever-present bodyguard, assuming the prerogatives of stardom before he'd earned them. In the middle of the hype, he found time to co-produce Reed's "Transformer" album and remix the Stooges' "Raw Power," side projects that cemented his affiliation with the addled royalty of outsider rock. (His resuscitation of Iggy Pop as a solo act a few years later helped, too.) And he donated one of his best songs, the anthemic smash "All the Young Dudes," to Mott the Hoople, producing their album as well, which ensured his primacy over the glam field.</p>
<p>In the year following the release of "Ziggy Stardust," Bowie's look got weirder and weirder: The casual blond spikes became a lurid scarlet nimbus, the layers of pancake multiplied until he looked like a zombie, fake hands grew out of his cat suit to clutch at his nipples. "The idea was to hit a look somewhere between the Malcolm McDowell thing with the one mascaraed eyelash and insects," he told an interviewer in 1993. At the same time, he was writing darker songs like "Panic in Detroit," "Cracked Actor" and "The Jean Genie," which appeared on the muddy, manic 1973 follow-up, "Aladdin Sane": Ziggy was becoming the picture of Bowie's Dorian Gray.</p>
<p>In July 1973, Bowie abruptly retired Ziggy without explanation. He came out with an amusing but unnecessary album of '60s covers, "Pin-Ups," then planned to write a stage musical based on "1984," but George Orwell's widow withheld the rights. He went ahead anyway with the roughly Orwellian suite that is "Diamond Dogs." The charging title song and "Rebel Rebel" are among Bowie's best singles and close off the glam era with decadent aplomb, but elsewhere on the album he delved into the depersonalizing effects of Orwell's totalitarian society in "We Are the Dead" and "Rock 'n' Roll With Me," whose chorus goes "When you rock 'n' roll with me/There's no one else I'd rather be." The absence of "with" at the end of that line points toward the icy, unhinged narcissism of Bowie's next phase.</p>
<p>Having relocated to the States and bid farewell to the ambisexual orgies of Ziggy's heyday, in 1974 Bowie bought a wardrobe full of double-breasted jackets and fat ties and set about becoming the most ersatz soul crooner ever. "Young Americans" is pretty fine as an update of the honored English tradition of appropriating black American music (and Robert Palmer clearly took notes), but it's no more interesting than any other record featuring Luther Vandross on vocals and David Sanborn on sax -- with the exception of the glorious, incomprehensible title song and "Fame," his first American No. 1 single.</p>
<p>Bowie next remodeled himself into the Thin White Duke, a persona so chilling that he seemed to be faking being human, like the extraterrestrial character he played in his first feature film, Nicholas Roeg's 1976 "The Man Who Fell to Earth." Bowie was excellent in the role, but it remains unclear just how much he was acting. The same year, he released one of his finest records, "Station to Station," which portrays a nearly psychotic emotional disconnection: "It's not the side effects of the cocaine/I'm thinking that it must be love"; "Should I believe that I've been stricken?/Does my face show some kind of glow?" Equivocation marks the gorgeous, unsettling love song "Stay," and the breathless narrator of "TVC15" communes only with his TV, telling us an unclear story about how it's sucked up his girlfriend. The music, slithery funk with overlays of squealing rock guitar and florid piano, is as audacious and peculiar as any rock music before or since. I used to play the hit single, "Golden Years," over and over, though I doubt many child psychologists would endorse this much coked-up anomie in an 11-year-old's diet.</p>
<p>Bowie escaped America and transferred his home base to Switzerland in 1976, while in London Johnny Rotten, his hair a ratty imitation of Ziggy Stardust's, followed the Ziggy blueprint for self-willed stardom. Over the next three years, collaborating with Roxy Music's former in-house deconstructionist, Brian Eno, Bowie made three consecutive albums, in Berlin and elsewhere in Europe, that avoided the problem of how to follow up a hit by largely disdaining mass sensibilities altogether. "Low" and "'Heroes'" (both 1977) had emotionally deranged singles; challenging cut-up lyrics (directions: Cut any writing into strips, rearrange and see what happens) and music (directions: Write out a song's chords on a chalkboard, point at them randomly until band goes mad); and long, experimental instrumentals that put off casual record buyers. The Wallflowers' clueless 1998 cover of "'Heroes'" only reinforces the original's claim to be one of the killer rock singles of all time. "Lodger," in 1979, eschewed the instrumentals, but the singles "Boys Keep Swinging" and "DJ" were as spiky as that old haircut. In short, Eno shook Bowie out of a solipsism that looked to be driving him around the bend. The trilogy's use of electronic textures in a pop context (influenced by the German group Kraftwerk) itself directly inspired the great new wave of British electro-pop, just as the doomy atmospherics sketched out a path for Joy Division, the Cure and thousands of black-draped followers.</p>
<p>In 1980, Bowie capped off the part of his career that matters by starring in the Broadway production of "The Elephant Man" and releasing his last landmark album, "Scary Monsters," on which he belts out the strongest, most actorly vocals of his career, ranging from the howling fury of the opening rant, "It's No Game," to the song's exhausted reprise at the end, sandwiching in between every stance from tortured madness ("Scream Like a Baby") to haughty ennui ("Fashion") to the stunning minidrama of "Ashes to Ashes," which revisits space boy Major Tom, still floating around the ether 11 years after "Space Oddity."</p>
<p>Bowie's '80s were a startling retrenchment, during which he introduced his next persona: Normal David. After finally escaping the financial depredations of a Draconian old management contract, he decided in 1983 to earn himself a nest egg. Bowie gave interviews declaring his history of role-playing and sexual adventuring long past, essentially making sure no quirks remained to put off the buying public. Even his son Zowie was now called Joey. I remember the excitement when "Let's Dance" came out, the first Bowie album in three years, and how hard it was to get used to the idea that it was really Bowie -- that jolly, anti-intellectual party funk blasting from the frat houses. "Let's Dance" served its commercial purpose, but it was a far cry from past glories.</p>
<p>At this juncture, it's only polite to jump forward a dozen years, during which Bowie released a succession of dull albums that dared little, with the exception of his bar-band experiment, Tin Machine, which dared to be excruciating and got him dropped from his label. He appeared in several movies, including a swell turn as Pontius Pilate in "The Last Temptation of Christ," but his other films were cult favorites at best ("The Hunger," "Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me," "Labyrinth," etc.). In 1992, he married Iman, which seemed to drop him with a clatter into the Mick Jagger/Rod Stewart bin of old rockers who replace their absconded muses with supermodels.</p>
<p>Even Bowie must have understood how dire things had gotten, for in 1995 he reconnected with  Eno, who, since their '70s work together, had gone on to co-produce some of the most popular and critically lauded records of the '80s and '90s, all by U2. The resulting album, "Outside," was bold and knotty, but also tuneless and thuggishly pretentious. (It's subtitled "The Nathan Adler Diaries" and further billed as "a non-linear gothic drama hyper-cycle." If you're still curious, God bless you.) Bowie told an interviewer that he was delighted with the album's "big hairy massive balls"; he subsequently toured with one of his musical offspring, Nine Inch Nails, but was regularly crucified by the competition.</p>
<p>He generated far more attention in 1997 by hosting his own enormous 50th birthday celebration at Madison Square Garden and by an unprecedented business gambit: He issued "Bowie Bonds" worth $55 million, using future royalties on his back catalog to back them. The bonds were all snapped up immediately by the Prudential Insurance Co., and Bowie's pockets were suddenly overflowing. It was a conceptual stunt worthy of the old Bowie, just in a new field. (James Brown issued his own bonds last summer, and other celebrities are rumored to be mulling it over.)</p>
<p>Amazingly, after nearly two decades in the aesthetic wilderness, his last two albums, 1997's "Earthling" and <a href="/ent/music/review/1999/10/15/bowie/index.html">"'Hours ... '"</a> from 1999, have been -- to me, anyway -- his most enticing since "Scary Monsters," and his portrayal of Andy Warhol was easily the most entertaining element of the 1996 film <a href="/weekly/basquiat1960819.html">"Basquiat."</a> "'Hours ... '" has no evident commercial or aesthetic axes to grind, a first for Bowie, and it features lovely, rueful songs of experience sung in a cracking, (apparently) nakedly emotional voice, suggesting that his role-playing days may at last be behind him. It was one of the best albums of 1999.</p>
<p>And Bowie's current numerous cyber-adventures prove he's still prodding at the future -- still "wiped out with things as they are." As the overseer of an Internet service provider, <a target="new" href="http://www.davidbowie.com">BowieNet,</a> he hosts chats for members, alerts them to worldwide cultural happenings and keeps up a sprightly journal that indicates he's a scarily happy man (a recent sample: "What great fans I've got! I had such a lovely time on the mini-tour and it was so good to see you."); the lyrics for one of the songs on "'Hours ... '" were solicited in an online contest. If you want a credit card with his picture on it, he's also the nominal patron of the online <a target="new" href="http://www.bowiebanc.com">BowieBanc.</a> He's been seriously painting for many years -- his style owes a large debt to Francis Bacon -- and uploads his work and others' to an <a target="new" href="http://www.bowieart.com">online gallery.</a> And a few months ago he contributed new music and his likeness (as well as Iman's) to a video game, <a href="/tech/review/1999/11/24/omikron/index.html">Omikron,</a> put out by the company that created Tomb Raider.</p>
<p>In September, Virgin Records rereleased Bowie's back catalog in revelatory remastered editions that sound more electrifying than ever. At age 53, he's alone among his contemporaries in retaining a high cool quotient among kids whose parents are old enough to have been teenage fans of Ziggy Stardust: When he appears at a Placebo concert or on the MTV Music Awards, he can still elicit genuine teenybopper swoons. Bowie may never change rock music again, but since he, more than anyone, honed rock's current cutting edge, few observers would not forgive him, in the end, any of his latter-day trespasses.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/bowie_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/25/bowie_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Nat King Cole&#8221; by Daniel Mark Epstein</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/epstein/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/epstein/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/1999/11/12/epstein</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A top-notch biography celebrates the  jazz piano genius who gained his greatest fame as a pop singer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>rom the late 1930s through the '40s, Nat Cole was known as the dazzling swing pianist who led the popular King Cole Trio and sang a little. In the '50s and '60s, he became a superstar pop singer; casual latter-day fans didn't even know he played piano. Daniel Mark Epstein, in his fond, authoritative new biography, "Nat King Cole" (for which he interviewed Cole's surviving family and associates), persuasively argues the case for Cole as a major jazz instrumentalist, but he's also sympathetic to the motivations behind Cole's turn to pop.</p><p>The second son of a Baptist preacher, Nathaniel Coles (he dropped the "s" early on, for no apparent reason) was born in 1919 and grew up in Chicago. He was a prodigy on the piano. Epstein says, only a little hyperbolically, that Chicago in the 1920s hosted "the greatest gathering of musical genius America has ever known, in its most creative decade"; the local lineup included Louis Armstrong, Jelly Roll Morton, Fats Waller and Earl Hines, and everyone else passed through. The young Cole modeled his high-speed, rhythmically sophisticated piano style on Hines'. He dropped out of school at 15; by 18 he had recorded for Decca with his bass-playing brother, Eddie, toured with the revue "Shuffle Along," gotten married to a dancer 10 years his senior and moved to Los Angeles, where he soon assembled the piano/guitar/bass trio that made him famous.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/epstein/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/12/epstein/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patti Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/smith_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/smith_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 1999 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Easter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patti Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert mapplethorpe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/bc/1999/11/09/smith</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A punk icon in jeans and leather jacket, she added ecstasy and spiritual exaltation to the poet-songwriter equation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>he was a weird icon from the start, a girl who dressed like a boy, a poet<br />
with Keith Richards' hair and a strut copied from Bob Dylan in "Don't Look<br />
Back," a white woman who called herself a nigger, a darling of the<br />
avant-garde who hit the pop charts in 1975 without modifying her vision in<br />
the slightest, then abdicated her stardom when she found better things to<br />
do. Her first album, "Horses," came out nearly a quarter-century ago and is<br />
commonly short-listed as one of the greatest rock albums of all time, but you're unlikely to hear any of it on classic-rock radio: In the mental jukebox<br />
of the populace, Patti Smith is represented, if at all, by her one hit<br />
single, "Because the Night" -- naturally, the most conventional song of all<br />
her '70s output.</p><p>When I was in high school in the suburbs, in the early-'80s, Patti Smith was<br />
no kind of icon. Musically, she didn't jibe with buzz-saw punk, ominously danceable<br />
new wave or pasteurized FM radio rock; she evaded the jury-rigged<br />
radar of adolescent rebellion. Teen rebels, of course, generally want an<br />
existing "countercultural" pack to join, complete with wardrobe and hairdo<br />
guidelines. Even if Patti Smith had not recently stopped making records (and<br />
even if we'd known to listen to the ones she had made), she was too much of<br />
a misfit for the misfits to embrace.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/smith_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/11/09/smith_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Backbeat: Earl Palmer&#039;s Story&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/31/scherman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/31/scherman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock and Roll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/1999/08/31/scherman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An account of one of rock &#039;n&#039; roll&#039;s legendary drummers doesn&#039;t go deep enough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he flap lures you in with a partial list of his recording credits: Little Richard, Fats Domino, Lloyd Price, Sam Cooke, <a href="/ent/music/feature/1998/05/15feature.html">Frank Sinatra,</a> <a href="/ent/music/feature/1998/12/cov_16featureb.html">Ray Charles,</a> <a href="/weekly/music960708.html">Neil Young.</a> In the '50s and '60s, Earl Palmer was a top drummer-for-hire, first in New Orleans, where he grew up, and then in Los Angeles. He's generally credited with inventing rock 'n' roll drumming. But if you're looking for gossip about the rock pioneers or an insider's account of the creation of their music, you won't find it in "Backbeat: Earl Palmer's Story." Rock 'n' roll was a small part of Palmer's career, and it was merely a professional commitment, seldom a thrill. In Tony Scherman's short, unsatisfying portrait, the bulk of which is told in Palmer's own words, it's Palmer's raucous early years, on the prewar black vaudeville circuit and in the clubs and on the streets of New Orleans, that stand out.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/08/31/scherman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/31/scherman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Short History of Rudeness&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/06/caldwell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/06/caldwell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/1999/08/06/caldwell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can a writer investigate manners when his definition of manners includes everything we do?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>n Jerry Springer's America, using the word "rudeness" to characterize any behavior that slides past traditional boundaries of civility stinks faintly of mothballs and lavender. Of course, as Mark Caldwell reminds us in "A Short History of Rudeness," for many centuries commentators have cried out with fervor that "oafishness and riot abound," and he claims that one might adduce as many examples of increased delicacy in contemporary American society as of arrant misrule. Really, though, much of our culture at the moment seems deliberately built on the holes between old rules of politeness. Got burned by hot coffee? Sue the restaurant. Need a grabby hook for your cartoon comedy? Subtitle it "Bigger, Longer & Uncut."</p><p>Caldwell posits reasonably that rules of etiquette spring from the attempted aping of the upper crust by the hoi polloi, a paradoxical endeavor in our theoretically classless society, yet one that has proved ever profitable for publishers of etiquette manuals. But oyster forks and outstretched pinkies interest Caldwell far less than the way we conduct our relationships with family members, employers, people of different race or gender and strangers, whether in person or on the Internet.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/08/06/caldwell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/08/06/caldwell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Killer in Drag&#8221; and &#8220;Death of a Transvestite&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/wood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/wood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/1999/06/22/wood</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hopelessly inept transvestite filmmaker was also, it turns out, a hopelessly inept transvestite novelist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>A</b>s a filmmaker, Edward D. Wood Jr. was the ultimate auteur, stamping his work with a signature idiocy that resists even camp appreciation. As if to prove his talents were far too hideous to be contained by the movies, two pulp novels Wood wrote in the mid-'60s are now being reissued with every typo and malapropism intact. The rotten books are actually more fun than the rotten movies, in the same way that a paper cut is more fun than poison ivy.</p><p>In "Killer in Drag," Glen Marker is the top transvestite hired killer in New York. He wants to ditch his life of crime, get a sex-change operation and live permanently as his gorgeous alter ego, Glenda Satin. (Note: The schlub portrayed by Wood in his ridiculous cinematic work "Glen or Glenda" has only the name and nylons in common with the novel's hard-boiled hero.) Glen finds himself hunted by both the police and the mob, so he goes on the lam and winds up in a small Colorado town, where he buys a decrepit carnival and finds love with the town whore. But his Ferris wheel falls over and kills a few people, forcing him to hit the road again. In the sequel, "Death of a Transvestite," Glen makes it to Los Angeles and bonds with another hooker, while the beaky, jealous Paul/Pauline, a rival drag killer, chases Glen/Glenda down. In the middle of a hippie riot on the Sunset Strip, Pauline and Glenda shoot it out. Glenda wins the battle but gets the electric chair.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/wood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/22/wood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

