<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Ian Williams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/ian_williams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bully for you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/02/bolton_28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/02/bolton_28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/08/02/bolton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Capitol Hill freshly vacated, Bush installed U.N.-hating John  Bolton as ambassador to the U.N. If Democrats really were partisan hacks, they'd rejoice that the president chose this incompetent ideologue to sell his foreign policies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week is the 60th anniversary of the Enola Gay dropping the bomb on Hiroshima, so perhaps it is entirely appropriate that George W. Bush has gone for the nuclear option and dropped John Bolton on the United Nations in New York. Bolton's diplomatic talents are such that he could start a shouting match in a Trappist monastery. He should make things at the U.N. go with a bang. </p><p> It almost counts as tact on the part of the White House that it waited until Monday to announce Bolton's recess appointment, instead of making the announcement on Friday as soon as the limos speeding senators to Ronald Reagan airport on their ways home had left the U.S. Capitol. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/08/02/bolton_28/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/08/02/bolton_28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The spirits of 1776</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/07/02/rum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/07/02/rum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/07/02/rum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You thought it was all about tea? Nope, the American Revolution started because the colonists were desperate for rum. Yo ho ho!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the light of President Bush's attempt at Fort Bragg, N.C., last Tuesday to co-opt the July Fourth celebrations to support his war, it is time for some counter-revisionist history. </p><p>The American Revolution was not about tea. It was about rum: the real spirit of 1776. </p><p><img class='wp-image-10033063' src='http://media.salon.com/2005/07/washington_bottle.gif' /> </p><p>The tea that was thrown into Boston Harbor was actually tax free, and the men throwing it overboard were doing so at the behest of local merchants who had warehouses filled with more expensive smuggled tea that they could sell only if the British East India Co.'s cheaper cargo was unloaded. They knew that no amount of patriotism would stop the Bostonians from buying a cheaper product. </p><p>But the real conflict between the colonists and Britain began over taxes on molasses, not tea. And that's where the French come in. The Founding Fathers not only loved the French, but they also loved the molasses that Paris' Caribbean colonies produced -- and they loved even more the rum that New England distillers made from it. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/07/02/rum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/07/02/rum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The nuclear bully</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/nuclear_nonproliferation_treaty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/nuclear_nonproliferation_treaty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/06/01/nuclear_nonproliferation_treaty</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration tried and failed to strong-arm the rest of the world on nukes. As a result, the chances of runaway proliferation are higher than they've been in decades.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/2005/05/13/bolton_un/">John Bolton</a> has not yet been confirmed as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, his work goes marching before him. His "dead hand" was firmly clutching the throat of the American delegation at the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty review conference -- a monthlong gathering at the United Nations that petered out May 27 without agreement on a formal agenda, let alone on further steps toward nonproliferation. </p><p>Without saying it quite as explicitly as Bolton has said it in the past, the American position was to deny that the treaty has any force over the United States while at the same time demanding that it be applied vigorously against those it has unilaterally nominated as bearings on the "axis of evil." The Bush administration refused to allow anything else substantial, such as previous American commitments in the treaty and at earlier conferences, onto the agenda. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/nuclear_nonproliferation_treaty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/06/01/nuclear_nonproliferation_treaty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The good news about Bolton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/bolton_un_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/bolton_un_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//2005/05/13/bolton_un</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even if he's ultimately confirmed, those who spoke out against him have signaled to the world that he doesn't represent all Americans -- and ensured he won't wield a big stick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not since Pontius Pilate has there been such a public display of hand-washing. The nomination of <a href="http://archive.salon.com/opinion/feature/2005/03/09/bolton_un/index.html">John Bolton,</a> the man the president wants to represent America to the world as our ambassador to the United Nations, was ushered unendorsed to the Senate floor by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, with almost half of its Republican members holding their noses, while blaming the White House for its obduracy in forcing such an unsuitable candidate on them. Unable to muster a majority in his committee to actually endorse Bolton's nomination, chairman Richard Lugar himself said "Secretary Bolton's actions were not always exemplary." </p><p>Rarely has a nominee been damned with such faint praise by his own party. Indeed, from their public disquiet about Bolton's qualifications, we must assume that only the deepest party loyalties -- or the fear that Karl Rove would put the severed head of their favorite horses in their beds while they slept -- kept the likes of Lincoln Chafee, Chuck Hagel, George Voinovich and Lugar from outright rebellion. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/bolton_un_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/05/13/bolton_un_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reinventing &#8220;we the peoples&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/26/un_reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/26/un_reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/03/26/un_reforms</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kofi Annan proposes the first major reforms of the U.N. since it was created 60 years ago, and he knows they won't please everyone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an effort to increase the relevance of, and confidence in, the United Nations, which was created 60 years ago to prevent a repetition of World War II, Secretary-General Kofi Annan on March 21 presented several proposals for reform of the world body to reflect the changed nature of global conflicts since 1945. The title of his <a target="_blank" href="http://www.un.org/largerfreedom/">63-page report</a> is "In Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All." </p><p>It is emblematic that among the few actual changes he recommends to the text of the <a target="new" href="http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/">U.N. Charter</a> are the deletion of its clauses penalizing Germany and Japan and the abolition of the Military Staff Joint Committee that was supposed to coordinate operations against any resurgence by those nations. The committee has met every two weeks for all those decades without making a single decision, and the "former enemy powers" are expected to be invited to join the former victors as permanent members of the U.N. Security Council. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/26/un_reforms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/26/un_reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global gorilla</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/09/bolton_un/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/09/bolton_un/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2005/03/09/bolton_un</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush's jaw-dropping nomination of John Bolton as ambassador to the U.N. is a slap in the world's face.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the old days, Sen. Marcus Cato used to tell the Romans in every speech, "Carthage must be destroyed." Even the Romans were never crass enough to send him there as an ambassador. It takes an imperial America to send to the United Nations a representative who has spent decades preaching that the organization should be destroyed, and that the United States should disregard the whole concept of international law on which it is based. But in and out of government, John Bolton has at least had the dubious virtue of consistency. </p><p> President Bush's appointment sends an eloquent message of utter contempt for the U.N. and all its members -- which happen to include almost every country in the world. Indeed, the only significant country without a vote in the U.N. is one of the few that will be happy with the appointment. Taiwan had hired Bolton as a consultant for $30,000 to advise it on its, as it transpired, unsuccessful bid to join the organization. </p><p> There is still the chance for a sanity clause to be resurrected in Washington. When it comes time for confirmation, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee is relatively evenly balanced at 10 to eight, and its majority chairman, Richard Lugar, is eminently sane and surely realizes the damage that this appointment will do to American diplomacy. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/09/bolton_un/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/09/bolton_un/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush to Arab world: Drop dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/24/sideline/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/24/sideline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/09/24/sideline</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Driven by right-wing ideologues and his own zeal, President Bush has taken Ariel Sharon's side in the Middle East even while plotting a war with Iraq. Foreign policy experts say that's a dangerous combination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the old days scientists used to look for the "missing link," the fossils that bridged the gap between stupid monkeys and clever men. There is a similar missing link between the U.S. government and a coherent foreign policy. The Bush administration has totally sidelined <i>the</i> Middle East conflict, the one between Israel, the Palestinians and the Arab world. For a variety of reasons -- the ascendancy of neoconservative hawks in the White House and the State Department; President Bush's own embrace of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's hard-line positions; Bush's simple, black-and-white view of the world, in which the "war on terrorism" trumps everything else; the complete absence of any pressure from Congress; and domestic political considerations -- the Bush administration has apparently decided that it doesn't need to reach out to the Arab world by pushing for Mideast peace before a possible invasion of Iraq. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/09/24/sideline/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/24/sideline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suddenly, the U.N. backs Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/15/un_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/15/un_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2002 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/09/14/un</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's speech left the world governing body little choice but to get tough on Saddam.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A day after his speech to the United Nations, President Bush's sudden conversion to multilateralism along the road to Baghdad appeared to be succeeding beyond all expectations. His call for the United Nations Security Council to hold Iraq accountable, complemented by some delicate diplomatic horse trading, has won critical international support for his push to confront Saddam Hussein, even among those who see no connection between Iraq and the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. </p><p>In interviews yesterday, U.N. officials and other experts in foreign affairs suggested that by heeding the global cry against a unilateral U.S. invasion, Bush had skillfully maneuvered the world governing body into a position where it had little choice but to sharply increase pressure on the Iraqi dictator. If the U.N. did not act, the experts said, it would appear incapable of enforcing the Gulf War resolutions it passed to control Saddam -- and which Saddam has flouted in recent years. </p><p>Now, the Security Council seems likely pass a difficult choice on to Saddam: Either quickly agree to admit a new team of weapons inspectors with unconditional access to Iraqi facilities or face an invasion. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/09/15/un_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/09/15/un_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mary Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/26/mary_robinson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/26/mary_robinson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/interview/2002/07/26/mary_robinson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The outgoing U.N. high commissioner for human rights talks about running afoul of the Bush administration over Israel and the Palestinians, ending the "cycle of impunity" and standing up to bullies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, the United Nations General Assembly approved Secretary-General Kofi Annan's nomination of Brazilian Sergio Vieira de Mello to become the next U.N. high commissioner for human rights. His term -- Vieira de Mello is just the third individual to hold the position -- will begin on Sept. 12 and he's sure to be watched closely -- by both human rights groups and the Bush administration. </p><p> After Vieira de Mello's nomination was announced on Monday, Kenneth Roth, executive director of Human Rights Watch, said, "[Vieira de Mello] brings to the job an impressive diplomatic and U.N. background, but he lacks hands-on human rights experience. The challenge he faces is to prove that he will stand up to governments and be an unwavering voice on behalf of the victims of human rights abuse." </p><p> As Vieira de Mello himself told Reuters, "The job in itself is a minefield ... It is the risk of politicization and how to manage that, how to ensure that human rights are not over politicized." And no one can vouch for his assertion better than Mary Robinson, the outgoing high commissioner, whose term ends on the now iconic date of Sept.11. It's common knowledge that her defense of the Durban Conference against Racism, which U.S. and Israeli representatives walked out of, her views on the Israel-Palestine conflict and her condemnation of the U.S. treatment of prisoners in Camp X-ray at Cuba's Guantanamo Bay provoked the Bush administration to oppose the extension of her term. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/07/26/mary_robinson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/07/26/mary_robinson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush&#8217;s hatchet man in the State Department</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/10/bolton_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/10/bolton_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/05/10/bolton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Colin Powell tries to present a kinder, gentler America to the world, his hard-line underling John Bolton is pushing an America-]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Monday was a busy day for Undersecretary of State John Bolton. In a speech to the conservative Heritage Foundation, he added new enemies to the administration's axis of evil hit list, telling the audience that Cuba, Syria and Libya had joined Iran, Iraq and North Korea as enemies and evildoers extraordinaire. That same day, Bolton sent a letter to the United Nations reversing President Clinton's decision to back the founding of the International Criminal Court. </p><p> The U.S. "does not intend to become a party" to the International Criminal Court, Bolton wrote, and therefore "has no legal obligation arising from its signature" on the Rome statute that established the ICC. </p><p> Reversing the ICC agreement was a strange role for Bolton, since as undersecretary of state for disarmament affairs and international security he does not exactly have the court in his bailiwick. But the busy Bolton has never let his job title blunt his ambition, and he has emerged as an energetic force trying to return the Bush administration to its pre-Sept. 11 habits of unilateralism, thumbing its nose at the rest of the world. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/05/10/bolton_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/10/bolton_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush: Sharon&#8217;s lapdog</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/02/jenin_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/02/jenin_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2002 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/05/02/jenin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's conniving in Israel's disgraceful refusal to allow the U.N. to investigate Jenin has brought the rage and contempt of the rest of the world down on both countries.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Bush has done a lot in very little time to undermine the macho image of Texans worldwide. Foreign leaders now see there is no apparent limit to the defiance he will endure from his friend Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister. Never has the tail wagged the dog quite so energetically or humiliatingly. Foreigners tend to have longer memories than Americans, particularly in the Middle East, and outside of Israel, diplomats unfavorably contrast Bush's behavior with the way his father went nose to nose with then Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir when the latter assumed -- wrongly -- that he could defy the White House on the question of Jewish settlements in Palestinian territory. </p><p> Now, two weeks after ignoring Bush's demand for an end -- "without delay" -- to Israel's Operation Defensive Shield, Sharon has succeeded in rebuffing a U.N. fact-finding mission in Jenin, apparently with U.S. blessing. An angry Kofi Annan called off the planned inquiry late Wednesday. Israel may escape immediate consequences for its defiance, but the obstruction will have far-reaching ramifications: for the country's image, for the United Nations, for the U.S.'s diplomatic stature, and above all for the administration's war on terror, which seems increasingly to be shorthand for "leave Afghanistan a shambles, let Sharon have his way in the West Bank, and full speed ahead to Baghdad." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/05/02/jenin_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/05/02/jenin_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye, Senator Know-nothing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/23/helms_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/23/helms_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/08/23/helms</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesse Helms trashed the U.N. and drove our allies nuts. And the Bush team will keep his go-it-alone ideology alive even after he leaves office.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Future historians may find it difficult to believe that for much of the momentous last decade, American foreign policy was held hostage by a churlish septuagenarian bigot whose view of the world made Rush Limbaugh's seem suavely cosmopolitan. Books have been written about the role of the individual in history, and North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms will doubtless go down in future tomes as the lone destroyer of one of the most promising diplomatic eras of the 20th century. And his retirement, announced in a North Carolina television appearance Wednesday night, can't undo his impact on the world. </p><p> Even before he became chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Helms used and abused his power as ranking Republican on the committee to turn American diplomacy into an oxymoron, making the world's only superpower the object of sniggers, incredulous exasperation and dogged opposition among its allies as well as enemies. </p><p> Helms was widely reviled by liberals for his atavistic views on race, affirmative action and gay rights. "If the homosexuals would stop doing what they are doing, an end would be put to all future cases of AIDS," he once said memorably. An ardent segregationist, in 1996 he played the race card in his last race with Harvey Gantt, an African-American, with a nationally attacked television ad featuring a white worker ostensibly rejected for a job because of his race. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/23/helms_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/23/helms_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kooks &#8216;R&#8217; U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/kooks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/kooks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2001 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/07/27/kooks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By going its own way on biological weapons, Kyoto, missile defense and a growing list of global issues, the Bush administration is turning the United States into a pariah.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the City Council of La Verkin, Utah, was forced to reconsider its recent ordinance that banned residents from flying United Nations flags, and required anyone who worked for the U.N. both to post notices advertising their infamy and to file reports on same with City Hall. The councilors had been warned that they were open to First Amendment lawsuits on freedom of expression. Faced with a choice between their principles and a hike in taxes to pay the lawyers' bills, they backed down. </p><p>Even so, despite this brief moment of lucidity, the city fathers left intact local laws that declared La Verkin a U.N.-free zone, and banned the U.N. from taxing the city or stationing U.N. troops there. They categorically forbade the flying of the U.N. flag from the City Hall flagstaff. The Associated Press quotes Eliot Hill, clearly one of the few voices of sanity among the 3,300 La Verkin residents, as saying, "All this does is make us look like a bunch of kooks." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/kooks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/07/27/kooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ugly Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/human_rights_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/human_rights_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2001 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2001/05/08/human_rights</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't blame it all on Bush -- the world's grievances against the U.S. have been stewing for a long time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week's ouster of the United States from the United Nations Human Rights Commission has turned into a political Rorschach test for politicians and editorialists from left to right, who have read their own domestic prejudices into this inky blot on American diplomacy. In fact, the U.S. deserved to lose the seat, even if countries like Sudan certainly did not deserve to win. </p><p> Some Democrats have seen the vote as a particular rebuff to the Bush administration and its attitude. But defeat should really be seen as the result of a long-standing American neglect of diplomacy. Certainly, the Bush administration has made some embarrassing mistakes: Picking a major campaign contributor who does not speak French to serve as U.S. ambassador to France was unfortunate. So was the failure to push the appointment of the U.S. ambassador-designate to the United Nations, John Negroponte, through the Senate. Many of the diplomats at the United Nations complained of being taken for granted by a low-level, low-energy U.S. campaign for the rights-commission seat. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/human_rights_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/05/08/human_rights_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The U.N.&#8217;s millennium bash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/08/un_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/08/un_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2000 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cuba]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/09/08/un</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Clinton shakes Fidel Castro's hand and sits in on a speech by Iran's president at the organization's P.R. bonanza.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security was tight in the Big Apple this week. Helicopters hovered in the sky, cops swarmed the streets, Coast Guard cutters plied the East River and divers combed its waters for signs of trouble. Motorcade after diplomatic motorcade brought traffic to a standstill in many parts of the city. Inside the restaurants in and around the United Nations headquarters, many on Amnesty International's most wanted list were sitting down to eat. And on Wednesday, the 150 or so government heads -- the largest number ever assembled at one time -- at the United Nations Millennium Assembly lunch showed a certain restiveness as they waited for the belated arrival of Bill Clinton. </p><p>The president strolled in nonchalantly, more than a half-hour late -- as he did at his own <a href="/politics/feature/2000/08/15/clintons/index.html">end-of-term speech</a> at the <a href="/directory/topics/democratic_national_convention/index.html">Democratic Convention</a> a few weeks earlier. Some old diplomatic hands weren't sure whether they should be more upset at the arrogance of the president or the subservience of the U.N. leaders who waited for him to start. "We wouldn't have waited more than five minutes," former Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar was overheard complaining. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/09/08/un_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/09/08/un_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immune from prosecution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/icc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/icc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/06/16/icc</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. diplomats are wrecking the chance to bring future Saddam Husseins to justice -- all for the sake of domestic politics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Clinton administration is offering a "Get Out of Jail Free" card to future Saddam Husseins and Slobodan Milosevics, simply in order to pander to the Pentagon and the Republican right on Capitol Hill. American diplomats are fighting a rearguard action in New York, in tandem with Congress in Washington, to emasculate the International Criminal Court that was established by the United Nations last year in Rome. </p><p>Why does the United States oppose a way to punish the world's greatest villains? In short -- and in no uncertain terms -- congressmen such as Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jesse Helms demand that no such court have jurisdiction over potential American criminals. </p><p>U.S. efforts to impede the court's development are the latest in a series of American slaps to the United Nations, such as the refusal to pay membership dues, leaving many international observers appalled. Law professor Christopher L. Blakesley of Louisiana State University speaks for many foreign affairs specialists when he characterizes the U.S. approach to the ICC. "From the first, it has been embarrassing, pathetic and nefarious." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/icc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/06/16/icc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Way Out There in the Blue&#8221; by Frances FitzGerald</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/fitzgerald_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/fitzgerald_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/04/28/fitzgerald</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The definitive account of Star Wars, the military fantasy that&#039;s soaked taxpayers for $60 billion -- and counting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>O</b>nce upon a time, according to science-fiction legend, a group of writers in Manhattan had an imaginative jam session about designing a new religion according to sci-fi principles; the result was Scientology. Something similar also occurred when, according to conservative sci-fi author Larry Niven, "The scheme that drove the Soviet Union bankrupt was first drafted at my house in Tarzana, [Calif.] by about 50 good people invited and led by Jerry Pournelle."</p><p>Also assembled were authors Robert A. Heinlein and Poul Anderson, retired Gen. Daniel O. Graham, astronaut Buzz Aldrin and aerospace industry luminaries in the Citizens' Advisory Council on National Space Policy, a group that apparently wrote parts of President Reagan's 1983 Star Wars speech. "We were gathered to build a space program, with costs and schedules, to submit to Ronald Reagan via his science advisor. We generated the Space Defense Initiative (or 'Star Wars' if you didn't like it.)"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/fitzgerald_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/28/fitzgerald_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alan Greenspan&#039;s nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/greenspan_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/greenspan_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2000 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Greenspan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2000/04/17/greenspan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His paranoia about inflation helped send world markets into free fall last week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The headlines in Saturday's Financial Times shouted "Dow Plunges on Inflation Fears." In fact, stock prices really fell in anticipation of irrational despondency by Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. The market, which Adam Smith called the "invisible hand" of lots of independent actors making separate decisions, has been reduced to a herd of lemmings second-guessing the moves of one unelected official with a passion for Ayn Rand and a recurring nightmare about, and an obsession with,  inflation. It was investors' fears of the Fed, prompted by Greenspan's own inflation paranoia, that led Greenspan to threaten an interest rate increase, and helped send stock prices tumbling.</p><p>Market prices dropped last week because they were over-inflated and that's what balloons do when you prick them. Greenspan helped play the role of the prick this time by threatening to hike interest rates, shaking a sensitive market uneasy about the possibility of a court-ordered split-up of Microsoft. Investors panicked, and sold as if they had some massive belated realization that most dot-com stocks have the same intrinsic value as Confederate scrip.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/greenspan_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/17/greenspan_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Patrick O&#039;Brian: A Life Revealed&#8221; by Dean King</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/21/king_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/21/king_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/review/2000/03/21/king</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bestselling novelist wasn&#039;t, it turns out, the man he claimed to be.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>e have all met people who seek escape into alternate universes where loyalty, comradeship, courage, initiative and like values are more prominently on display than they are in ours. And all <a href="/ent/feature/1999/10/29/trek/index.html">"Star Trek"</a> fans know that the best such universe is a ship, where Mr. Spock and Captain Kirk can play out intellect vs. instinct. <a href="/people/obit/2000/01/13/o_brian/index.html">Patrick O'Brian's</a> maritime novels are better written than "Star Trek," even if they're not quite as Homeric as some of O'Brian's more intoxicated admirers claim. Among his more levelheaded admirers is Dean King, an American writer who was nevertheless so smitten by O'Brian's Aubrey/Maturin series that he set about researching a biography of the novelist.</p><p>King's work necessarily suffers from O'Brian's almost total refusal to cooperate. Unlike most public figures who become the subject of such an endeavor, O'Brian remained, almost to the end of his very long life, such a recluse that a biographer has few outside sources to set against the novelist's own, as it turns out, almost entirely fictional version of his life. King completed the book before O'Brian died in January, and his epilogue barely catches up with the event.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/21/king_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/21/king_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patrick O&#039;Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/o_brian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/o_brian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/obit/2000/01/13/o_brian</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of the wildly popular 18th century seagoing saga created, out of his own life, a fiction nearly as elaborate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>W</b>hen <a target="new" href="http://www.wwnorton.com/pob/pobhome.htm ">Patrick O'Brian</a> died in Dublin early in the new year, not long after the publication of "Blue at the Mizzen," many of his readers were not only bereft, but also agog at the possibility that he may have left another novel laid down on the stocks. His <a target="new" href="http://www.io.com/gibbonsb/pob/">avid readership</a> spans oceans, classes and politics, from right to left, from Charlton Heston to Tom Stoppard. The long, discursive saga of Jack Aubrey, the British naval officer and Stephen Maturin, his surgeon-spy companion, takes readers into a fictional universe that covers the globe, yet is usually contracted into the claustrophobic wooden walls of a Royal Navy ship in the war against Napoleon.</p><p>O'Brian's fans declare that his work will live forever, but perhaps the most fascinating reading will be his own life story, which he had crafted as a fiction believed almost to the end by most reviewers and readers. Working as an honored guest at Trinity College, Dublin, for the last two years, he was recently awarded an honorary doctorate as a credit to Irish letters -- despite the fact that he'd adopted his name and his nom de plume, Patrick O'Brian, along with his Irishness, with no great claim to either.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/o_brian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/13/o_brian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
