<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Irin Carmon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/irin_carmon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 03:47:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Peace Corps volunteer&#8217;s hellish abortion story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peace_corps_volunteers_hellish_abortion_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peace_corps_volunteers_hellish_abortion_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lautenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Christine Carcano was raped in Peru, she felt the Peace Corps had her back. Until she needed an abortion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long after Christine Carcano learned the man who had raped her on the street in Peru had left her pregnant and with a case of pelvic inflammatory disease, there was another unwelcome revelation: The Peace Corps could evacuate her to Washington, but it couldn't pay for her abortion -- which would cost more than a month of her salary.</p><p>Carcano decided to tell her story publicly for the first time after reading <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/for_raped_peace_corps_volunteers_little_choice/">here</a> about the Peace Corps Equity Act, introduced by Sen. Frank Lautenberg last week, which would modify the current policy by extending Peace Corps health coverage to abortions in case of rape. Carcano, who majored in human biology at the University of Texas and is now working as a research assistant on HIV/AIDS, says she wasn't particularly educated about the politics of abortion. But then, in the months after her ordeal, the headlines were full of politicians talking about abortion, "legitimate rape" and doubting rape victims could even become pregnant. "I came back to my country and I felt like other Americans were against me or against my choices," she says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peace_corps_volunteers_hellish_abortion_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peace_corps_volunteers_hellish_abortion_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s half-dose of Plan B</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emergency contraception being made available for those 15 and up may sound like a victory. But here's why it's not]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounded like a major victory for reproductive health: Per an announcement by the FDA late Tuesday, emergency contraception will finally be available on the shelves for anyone 15 and up. Until now, women under 17 have needed a prescription for the time-sensitive and safe medication, and anyone seeking to buy Plan B had to find an open pharmacy counter. This is unquestionably a move in the right direction.</p><p>But there's a catch. Less than a month ago, the Obama administration was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/judge_overrules_obama_to_protect_womens_health/">court-ordered</a> to lift the age requirement entirely, by a federal judge calling them out for politicizing the process. There's no scientific or public health basis for any age limit -- the idea is that the morning-after pill be sold just as condoms are -- and requiring documentary proof of age presents a hurdle particularly for younger women and the undocumented. Also for no clear reason, Plan B will only be sold in places that have a pharmacy, as opposed to any convenience store, despite the fact that pharmacy employees will no longer be involved except with girls under 15.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/obamas_half_dose_of_plan_b/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to interpret Kirsten Gillibrand&#8217;s political opportunism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The skilled, potential presidential candidate has changed many of her positions. But do the ends justify the means?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're not allowed, it seems, to write an article about New York Sen. and possible presidential hopeful Kirsten Gillibrand without comparing her to Tracy Flick (Politico yesterday dutifully <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">observed</a> the tradition). Yes, Gillibrand is ambitious, female and blonde and has been said to have sharp elbows -- it's taken less than that to trot out the "Election" protagonist before -- but there may be a more interesting comparison here: Mitt Romney.</p><p>When Gillibrand -- a hot topic in political circles this week, as a potential liberal <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/04/kirsten-gillibrand-run-for-president-90706.html">presidential candidate</a> and a champion for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/senate_takes_steps_to_reduce_sexual_violence_in_the_military/">addressing sexual assault in the military</a> -- was appointed to Hillary Clinton's Senate seat in 2009, Nate Silver <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/01/is-kennedys-loss-conservatives-gain.html">wrote</a>, "This is not a terrific outcome for progressive Democrats," because "Gillibrand, statistically speaking, has been one of the more conservative Democrats in the House. Moreover, she is a somewhat proud conservative, being a member of the Blue Dog caucus. In a state like New York, which is capable of electing and re-electing a very liberal senator, that’s a somewhat underachieving result for the Democrats."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/how_to_interpret_kirsten_gillibrands_political_opportunism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For raped Peace Corps volunteers, little choice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/for_raped_peace_corps_volunteers_little_choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/for_raped_peace_corps_volunteers_little_choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peace Corps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lautenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peace Corps volunteer tells Salon about being violated twice and denied abortion coverage, due to politics (UPDATE)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update, 7:30 p.m.: </strong>A Peace Corps spokesperson responds:</p><p>"The safety and security of Peace Corps Volunteers is our highest priority. Over the past few years, we’ve put in place a number of new, significant practices and safeguards to reduce the risks for Volunteers and ensure victims of crime receive compassionate and effective support.</p><p>The Peace Corps supports Senator Lautenberg’s bill and the President’s Fiscal Year 2014 budget, which extends the same rights and protections to female Peace Corps Volunteers as many of their federal colleagues by applying exceptions on abortion restrictions as outlined in the Hyde Amendment."</p><div><strong>Original post:</strong></div><p>As Mary Kate Shannon waited to find out if she was pregnant after being raped for the second time as a Peace Corps volunteer in Peru, the healthcare coordinator told her her options were limited. "If I were pregnant, the Peace Corps could not pay for the abortion due to some kind of federal law," Shannon recalled in an interview with Salon. They would, however, pay for parenting classes.</p><p>"I felt betrayed," Shannon said. "I felt like it was a decision that was going to be made for me. I wasn't in a place financially where I felt like I could pay for it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/for_raped_peace_corps_volunteers_little_choice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/for_raped_peace_corps_volunteers_little_choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are terrorists so often men?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/why_are_terrorists_so_often_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/why_are_terrorists_so_often_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzhokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev was performing a kind of masculinity through public destruction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Losers" was what their uncle called them, and based on what we've learned since, it was Tamerlan Tsarnaev who fit society's measure for being one. Not that he didn't try to suggest otherwise. <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/04/23/tsarnaev-brothers-appeared-have-scant-finances/ZbNBuN2Gcz8IOFddKDIU0N/story.html?s_campaign=sm_tw" target="_blank">According</a> to the Boston Globe, though "the older brother liked to look like a man of means, once posing for a photo in front of a gleaming Mercedes sporting a long wool scarf and white leather slip-on shoes," it was all an act. And anyway, it was his wife Katherine's long hours as a home healthcare aide that kept the family afloat, not Tamerlan's boxing prowess or the odd jobs he occasionally worked.</p><p>We don't know why Tamerlan and his brother blew up the Boston Marathon -- we may never really know -- but we do know that in doing so, they were performing a kind of masculinity that took control of the city through public destruction.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/why_are_terrorists_so_often_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/why_are_terrorists_so_often_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>161</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right tries to pin Gosnell on Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_right_tries_to_pin_gosnell_on_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_right_tries_to_pin_gosnell_on_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parsing the bait-and-switch with Gosnell and all abortion care -- and a response to Ross Douthat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Later this week, President Obama will keynote Planned Parenthood's annual gala. According to some antiabortion activists, he <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2013/04/23/pro-life-group-calls-on-obama-to-cancel-planned-parenthood-appearance-in-wake-of-gosnell-trial/">shouldn't</a>, because Kermit Gosnell is on trial for murder. "In the wake of the gruesome and horrific revelations emanating from the trial of abortion Doctor Kermit Gosnell, we urge President Obama to cancel his fundraising speech for big abortion giant Planned Parenthood on Thursday night," said a statement from Live Action, which made its name trying to bring down Planned Parenthood with James O'Keefe-inspired video stings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_right_tries_to_pin_gosnell_on_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/the_right_tries_to_pin_gosnell_on_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eden Foods CEO&#8217;s bad week continues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/eden_foods_ceos_bad_week_continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/eden_foods_ceos_bad_week_continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eden Foods' Michael Potter may have just ruined his right-wing lawsuit and his business. And he's still talking]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"There's so much malevolence in your approach to this, I really don't see a lot of value in talking to you, Irin," said Michael Potter, the CEO of Eden Foods, back on the phone on Wednesday. Over the last week, I'd <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/">reported</a> that his organic food company (marketed to the crunchy, liberal set) was suing to avoid having to cover contraception in employee health plans -- as well as his subsequent phone call to me in which he <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/">doubled down</a> by saying he didn't actually care about birth control, because he's a man, but is suing because "Obama's in your bedroom."</p><p>This time, despite claiming he wouldn't talk to me, he stayed on the phone for 20 minutes to discuss, alternately angrily and resignedly, the <a href="https://www.facebook.com/edenfoods">massive backlash</a> among his liberal customer base to his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/">decision</a> to sue the Obama administration over contraceptive coverage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/eden_foods_ceos_bad_week_continues/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/eden_foods_ceos_bad_week_continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real Gosnell conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/the_real_gosnell_conspiracy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/the_real_gosnell_conspiracy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I take it back, there is one: How credulous media played into the right's strategy to ban all abortion ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to revise some of my earlier <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/">statements</a>. There is, in fact, a conspiracy around the case of Philadelphia doctor Kermit Gosnell. But it's being engineered not by a mainstream media cowed by the left out of covering his trial, but by the antiabortion movement. And while Gosnell's trial deserves fair, accurate and contextualized coverage, some journalists seem happy to stop at playing into the right's hands by buying their phony media narrative.</p><p>No one who supports the provision of safe abortion care to women excuses any of what Gosnell is accused of, from willfully gruesome conditions to sadistic treatment to infanticide. He is not typical, and there was, and has been, swift renunciation of his facility. But the case provides the ideal opportunity for the right-to-life movement to conflate his abusive clinic with all abortion as it's widely practiced in the U.S., and to focus on graphic later abortions, conveniently redirecting attention from their desire to ban all abortions for everyone. That desire, by the way, is being enacted into law explicitly in states like Arkansas and North Dakota, and implicitly with laws designed to close abortion clinics in states like Mississippi and Virginia.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/the_real_gosnell_conspiracy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/the_real_gosnell_conspiracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>141</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eden Foods doubles down in birth control flap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my report on soy company's anti-birth control agenda, its CEO calls to talk Obama, abortion and contraception]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"I've got more interest in good quality long underwear than I have in birth control pills," the unfamiliar voice on the phone said to me.</p><p>It was Michael Potter, the Eden Foods founder and CEO. He was calling to respond to my Salon report from last week, which revealed that his organic food company -- which markets itself to a crunchy, liberal crowd -- was quietly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/">suing the Obama administration</a> over its requirement that his company's employee health plan cover birth control. Mostly, he said in the most amiable, avowedly Midwestern way imaginable -- at one point he called himself "a pretty simple guy, a Midwestern homemade-soup guy" -- he was calling to apologize to me.</p><p>It wasn't that he was upset about my <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/">reporting</a> or what his company was doing. He was just sorry my request for comment had gone unanswered due to an oversight. I accepted the apology, and asked why he said he didn't care about birth control, since he filed a suit about it and all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/eden_foods_ceo_digs_himself_deeper_in_birth_control_outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>206</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are we too sensitive to &#8220;gaffes&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92nd Street Y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaffes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Irin Carmon on how verbal slip-ups often provide a glimpse at politicians' real opinions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this video produced by <a href="http://www.92y.org/" target="_blank">92nd St Y</a>, Irin Carmon explains why so-called "gaffes" often deserve the scrutiny they receive from the media.<br /> <iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qYz2j12wuXQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/are_we_too_sensitive_to_gaffes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is no Gosnell coverup</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horrors and underlying disparities exploited by Kermit Gosnell aren't new -- nor have they been ignored(UPDATE)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, the right wing has been working the refs, demanding to know why the press has been allegedly silent on the trial of Kermit Gosnell, the Philadelphia doctor who allegedly committed horrific acts against his patients with impunity for years. Fox News' Kristen Powers kicked it off with an Op-Ed in USA Today, <a  href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/04/10/philadelphia-abortion-clinic-horror-column/2072577/">claiming</a>, "The deafening silence of too much of the media, once a force for justice in America, is a disgrace." Michelle Malkin has helped <a href="http://twitchy.com/2013/04/10/kirsten-powers-michelle-malkin-quiz-the-media-whoiskermitgosnell-wheres-the-coverage/">spearhead</a> a Twitter campaign. Breitbart.com <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/04/12/Kermit-Gosnell-Abortion-Doc-Is-Most-Searched-Term-on-Politico-Yields-Zero-Matches">calls</a> it "a full-blown, coordinated blackout throughout the entire national media."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>586</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Irin Carmon: How to talk about a woman&#8217;s looks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/watch_irin_carmon_explain_how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/watch_irin_carmon_explain_how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The 92nd Street Y]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Irin Carmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kamala harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon staff writer on Obama's controversial crack -- and female politicians' vulnerability]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this video produced by <a href="http://www.92y.org/">92nd Street Y</a>, Salon's Irin Carmon dissects the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/">controversy</a> over President Obama's crack about California attorney general Kamala Harris, and the problem with commenting on female politicians' looks.</p><p><img class="fiveminVideoPlayer" style="width: 570px; height: 411px; display: block;" src="https://spthumbnails.5min.com/10354815/517740734_3_570_411.jpg" alt="Irin Carmon: How to Talk About Women's Looks" data-product="playerSeed" data-params="playList=517740734|||height=411|||width=570|||sid=1236|||origin=undefined|||relatedMode=2|||relatedBottomHeight=60|||companionPos=|||hasCompanion=false|||autoStart=false|||colorPallet=%23FF0000|||videoControlDisplayColor=%23191919|||shuffle=0|||isAP=1" /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/watch_irin_carmon_explain_how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/watch_irin_carmon_explain_how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Organic Eden Foods&#8217; quiet right-wing agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable Care Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A crunchy, natural food company marketed to liberals discreetly sues to stop covering employees' contraception]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The slogan for Eden Foods, which describes itself as the "oldest natural and organic food company in North America," is "creation and maintenance of purity in food." Its CEO and founder, Michael Potter, has been prominent in debates over labeling of organic food and GMOs. But the company has been quietly seeking in court another form of purity -- to Catholic doctrine about sex being solely for procreation. That goes not just for Potter, but for all 128 of his employees.</p><p>That is, Eden Foods -- an organic food company with no shortage of liberal customers -- has quietly pursued a decidedly right-wing agenda, suing the Obama administration for exemption from the mandate to cover contraception for its employees under the Affordable Care Act. In court filings, Eden Foods, <a href="http://www.thomasmore.org/sites/default/files/files/Eden%20Foods%20Complaint-%20Filed%20032013.pdf">represented</a> by the conservative Thomas More Law Center, alleges that its rights have been violated under the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the Administrative Procedure Act.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/organic_eden_foods_quiet_right_wing_agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thatcher: A female icon, but not a feminist one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's better to have women in public life, even those with whom we disagree, than no women in public life at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have always been women like Margaret Thatcher in power. Never more than one or two at a time, of course. Thatcher was the embodiment of what Katha Pollitt memorably <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/07/magazine/hers-the-smurfette-principle.html?pagewanted=all&amp;src=pm">called</a> "the Smurfette syndrome," which is when "a group of male buddies will be accented by a lone female, stereotypically defined." She was not a feminist icon, nor any kind of feminist, as she took pains to remind people. "Some of us were making it before women's lib was even thought of," she once sniffed. To make it any more obvious, she might as well have literally kicked the ladder out from under her.</p><p>For decades, Thatcher's gender provided some public relations cover for her most noxious politics. That was true even today in the White House's statement on her death, which included the following treacly sentence: "As a grocer’s daughter who rose to become Britain’s first female prime minister, she stands as an example to our daughters that there is no glass ceiling that can’t be shattered."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge overrules Obama to protect women&#8217;s health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/judge_overrules_obama_to_protect_womens_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/judge_overrules_obama_to_protect_womens_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathleen Sebelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crucial victory had to come from GOP-appointed judge -- not cowardly Obama or Sebelius]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, a federal judge appointed by Ronald Reagan did for women's health what the Obama administration was too <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/obama_says_no_to_plan_b_for_teens/">politically cowardly</a> to do: Make safe, time-sensitive emergency contraception available to everyone, regardless of age. The shameful thing is that it had to come to this.</p><p>The administration, said 2nd Circuit District Judge Edward Korman, acted in "bad faith" -- a phrase that arises again and again in the stinging decision. And Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius acted in a fashion that "was politically motivated, scientifically unjustified, and contrary to agency precedent."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/judge_overrules_obama_to_protect_womens_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/judge_overrules_obama_to_protect_womens_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to talk about a woman&#8217;s looks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kamala harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harrassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Attorney General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president of the United States fails the test -- again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were, perhaps, stupider things <a href="https://twitter.com/DylanByers/status/319906842794942464">said</a> recently than “How did it become so difficult to call a woman good-looking in public?” but I didn't happen to hear them. So congratulations, Dylan Byers of Politico. Your commentary on the president calling California Attorney General Kamala Harris “by far, the best looking attorney general" made my brain hurt.</p><p>It is not "difficult to call a woman good-looking in public," not in a world where women's looks are considered public property, to be commented on, uninvited, whether it's on the street, in a job interview, or in the press. Many people find it quite easy to do, many of them men, and many people who should know better, like Barack Obama.</p><p>This is hardly the first time Obama has been smarmily sexist under the guise of paying a compliment. In the same New York magazine story on Christine Quinn in which Mayor Michael Bloomberg was notoriously quoted saying, "Look at the ass on her," Obama got a pass for a more politely phrased brand of creepiness. According to the piece, Obama <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/christine-quinn-2013-2/">said</a> to a Republican legislator, 32-year-old Nicole Malliotakis, that she didn't look a day over 23. Quinn promptly joked that Malliotakis should become a Democrat, and the president chimed in, “Come on, honey! I said you’re pretty! I said you look 23!”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/how_to_talk_about_a_womans_looks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>237</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are female pols good for women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/are_women_politicians_good_for_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/are_women_politicians_good_for_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine Quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mayoral race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Steinem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As they vie for the highest jobs, it's the uncomfortable question that can't be ignored]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For about as long as women have been running for office, people who care about women's lot have wondered whether one at the top would improve life for the rest of us. And last week's skirmish in the New York City mayoral race was an object lesson.</p><p>The feminist bragging rights of Christine Quinn, the only female candidate in the New York race -- the front-runner, potentially the first female and the first lesbian mayor of the biggest city in America -- were being questioned. Using her power as speaker of the City Council, Quinn was blocking a sure-fire vote mandating paid sick days.</p><p>She faced a clear choice. While the bill was opposed by her key ally, Mayor Michael Bloomberg, lack of sick days disproportionately affects low-wage female workers, who also tend to have more care-giving responsibilities -- and the coalition including the Working Families Party and union leaders made sure everyone knew it. Just as Quinn needed the support of people like Gloria Steinem and other high-profile feminists for her campaign, they were holding firm in demanding a vote on paid sick leave as a women's issue. And it all came at a time when people who might vote on feminist bona fides were arguing over a central question raised by Sheryl Sandberg's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lean-In-Women-Work-Will/dp/0385349947/saloncom08-20">"Lean In"</a>: whether more female leaders would improve the lot of all women.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/are_women_politicians_good_for_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/are_women_politicians_good_for_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The antiabortion movement&#8217;s brewing civil war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_anti_abortion_movements_brewing_civil_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_anti_abortion_movements_brewing_civil_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota anti-abortion bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abortion bans in N. Dakota and Arkansas looked like wins for "pro-lifers." But the movement is deeply divided]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some antiabortion activists were crowing about their apparent <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/this_is_what_losing_looks_like/">victories</a> in North Dakota last week -- including an unprecedented ban on abortion at six weeks, before most women know they're pregnant -- but, notably, that's not what Peggy Noonan wanted to talk about on "Meet the Press" yesterday. When Chuck Todd asked her if such legislation "could be what motivates evangelicals again," Noonan promptly changed the subject. It was no accident.</p><p>"The real story this week is the haunting and disturbing story of this doctor in Philadelphia -- [Kermit] Gosnell, who is being tried this week," she said, adding, "This was a man who had an abortion mill, that was in fact a death mill for babies essentially born. Being tried now, we'll see how it goes. But this is a story that is haunting, about the implications of decisions made by courts." (In fact, Gosnell is accused of crimes that have never been sanctioned by any court, and appears to have been exploiting <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kate-michelman/kermit-gosnell-abortion_b_2924348.html">gaps in access</a> for low-income women.) The point was this: Noonan, in keeping with the bigger antiabortion groups, doesn't want to talk about banning abortion in the first trimester, when it is overwhelmingly <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx">supported</a> by Americans. They would rather change the subject to grislier, rarer, later procedures. Too bad for them that a growing number of state legislators aren't getting in line.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_anti_abortion_movements_brewing_civil_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/the_anti_abortion_movements_brewing_civil_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Supreme Court, anti-gay movement is humiliated</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/in_supreme_court_anti_gay_movement_was_humiliated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/in_supreme_court_anti_gay_movement_was_humiliated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Clement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberta Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both sides of the marriage fight were presented on a national stage this week. It wasn't even close]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn't take long for the empty truth about the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act to be exposed Wednesday, and there was little equality opponents could do. At the Supreme Court hearing, Elena Kagan, the newest justice, read from the House Report from Congress when it passed the law in 1996, which summarized DOMA's entire legal underpinning: "Congress decided to reflect and honor a collective moral judgment and to express moral disapproval of homosexuality." According to people in the room, there were gasps and laughter at the so-called "gotcha moment."</p><p>It was a <em>duh</em> moment, but a necessary one. Yes, DOMA's about discrimination. That disapproval of gay people, not tradition or government uniformity, is at the root of the act is blatantly obvious both to anyone who observed it at the time and to everyone who has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/in_support_of_facebooks_sea_of_red_for_equality/">changed</a> their Facebook profile photo this week. But it needed to be set out on a national stage, a few feet away from rainbow-festooned children asking what the big deal was. This week, both sides put forward their best cases and it quickly became clear the opposition to equality is based not on law or reason, but bigotry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/in_supreme_court_anti_gay_movement_was_humiliated/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/in_supreme_court_anti_gay_movement_was_humiliated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>383</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposition 8 defenders have gender anxiety</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elena Kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fear of marriage as "genderless institution" guides anti-gay crew in court today. Why SCOTUS may not buy it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if the Supreme Court does decide to punt on the Proposition 8 case, today's oral arguments again made something clear: Defenders of the marriage equality ban are very, very anxious about gender roles. And a majority of the Court may not be buying it.</p><p>Defenders of California's ballot referendum banning gay marriage said today in court, and in their brief, that if marriage becomes a "genderless institution," children will suffer, because gay people can't procreate without help -- or rather, because marriage evidently exists to sanctify the accidental baby-making of men and women, despite the fact that so many women and men making babies today are rejecting marriage. Yes, this is their real argument.</p><p>Making it into a "what about the children" question sounds better than hating gay people for being gay, and it also sounds better than saying that men are intended for one thing and women for another. And yet that's exactly the implication made clear before the Supreme Court today. (The child-welfare argument may not work, either, no matter how much Antonin Scalia fulminated about the "sociological evidence" being too inconclusive about the impact of being raised by gay parents -- there was swing voter Anthony Kennedy wondering aloud whether the "voices of the children" of gay people should be heard.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/prop_8_defenders_have_gender_anxiety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>