<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Irin Carmon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/irin_carmon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do millennials care about abortion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview, NARAL's president tells Salon it's time a new generation leads. But she's not sure they will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Roe v. Wade's 40th anniversary, NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan, 60, announced she would celebrate by stepping down and handing the reins to a younger generation -- the same one she had been <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2010/04/nancy-keenan-re-1.html">arguing</a> for years lacks the pro-choice intensity and commitment of her own.</p><p>Formed originally to repeal abortion bans before Roe, NARAL is now most closely associated with lobbying on the federal and state level, and for its close ties to the Democratic Party. Keenan's departure after eight years follows an election cycle when Democrats didn't apologize for being pro-choice -- and won.</p><p>This last election year also featured unprecedented public mobilization, across generations, on issues around abortion, birth control and rape. Two men, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, most closely associated with a total abortion ban lost Senate bids they'd seemed poised to win. Akin, too, came from a House of Representatives where antiabortion and anti-family planning legislating had seemed like a full-time job, but whose actual legislative victories have been few.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michigan, Virginia pass backdoor abortion restrictions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Snyder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transvaginal ultrasound]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governors in Michigan, Virginia sneak in a New Year surprise when no one was looking: Abortion restrictions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Friday before the long  holiday weekend, the Republican governors of Michigan and Virginia snuck in a little New Year's surprise for the women of their states, quietly signing abortion legislation that helped make 2012 the second most restrictive year for reproductive rights.</p><p>In Michigan, Rick Snyder <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/29/us-usa-abortion-michigan-idUSBRE8BS00N20121229">signed</a> a bill passed by the lame-duck Senate -- the same one whose anti-union legislating dominated headlines in recent weeks -- requiring clinics that perform more than 120 abortions a year to become surgical outpatient facilities, a level of licensing intended to be onerous and put clinics out of business. He also approved a bill that purports to screen for women being coerced into abortions.</p><p>Snyder did veto another bill limiting insurance coverage in private employee plans, which would have required purchase of a separate abortion rider. He objected to that on the grounds that rape victims would have to pay out of pocket if they didn't buy the rider, and because, "As a practical matter, I believe this type of policy is an overreach of government into the private market." Overreach of government into other realms, of course, is another matter entirely. (According to Michigan resident Emily Magner, one legislator <a href="http://www.musingsofalady.com/2012/12/13/michigan-republicans-gone-rogue/">interrupted</a> her to cry, "THIS ISN’T ABOUT WOMEN! THIS IS ABOUT PROTECTING FETUSES!”)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/michigan_virginia_pass_backdoor_abortion_restrictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with drug testing pregnant women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/whats_wrong_with_drug_testing_pregnant_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/whats_wrong_with_drug_testing_pregnant_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rights of women are under attack in blue states as well as red ones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Daily News' new <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/weed-dozen-city-maternity-wards-regularly-test-new-mothers-marijuana-drugs-article-1.1227292">analysis</a> of the drug testing of postpartum women in New York City maternity wards -- and the neglect proceedings that can follow, often targeting low-income communities -- is a reminder that this intersection of the drug war and creeping personhood isn't limited to red states.</p><p>Such testing tends to happen at the discretion of the hospital. "Private hospitals in rich neighborhoods rarely test new mothers for drugs, whereas hospitals serving primarily low-income moms make those tests routine and sometimes mandatory," concludes The News' Oren Yaniv. This is true more broadly. <a href="http://www.advocatesforpregnantwomen.org/issues/pregnancy_and_drug_use_the_facts/">According</a> to the National Advocates for Pregnant Women, "More than eighteen states now address the issue of pregnant women’s drug use in their civil child neglect laws, and a growing number of these states make it possible to remove a child based on nothing more than a single positive drug test."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/whats_wrong_with_drug_testing_pregnant_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/whats_wrong_with_drug_testing_pregnant_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the White House a boys&#8217; club?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Flournoy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democrats do the diversity shuffle to ensure the cabinet and Congressional committee chairs look like America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political expediency can make a sudden feminist out of anyone, apparently. There was former Romney advisor Dan Senor <a href="https://twitter.com/dansenor/status/281737762326069248">on Twitter</a> last week, expressing his distaste for potential Defense Secretary nominee Chuck Hagel: "Isn't it strange that the President dropped Rice but is dug in over #Hagel? Especially when he can nominate the highly qualified #Flournoy?"</p><p>Senor's main implication was that Barack Obama was suddenly showing his <em>true</em> anti-Israel cards by having "dug in" on someone he hasn't even nominated yet. The secondary suggestion, what with the mention of "highly qualified" along with the fact that both Susan Rice and former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy are female, seemed to be trying to beat Obama with a stick his campaign successfully wielded against Romney's: Diversity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/is_the_white_house_a_boys_club/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The prettification of gun culture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_prettification_of_gun_culture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_prettification_of_gun_culture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pro-gun world is aggressively exploiting female fears to grow their base -- and it's been working]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is something that becomes clear when you look at polling data on support for gun control laws, both after Sandy Hook and over the past several years: The same demographics that rejected Republicans in the presidential election are<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/News/study-support-gun-control-10-year-high/story?id=18015933#.UNTDZOOe8fJ"> likeliest</a> to support gun control, notably Latinos of both genders and women across the board.</p><p>White male Republicans in redder regions are still the base for untrammeled gun rights, even if they're not the only ones. But when it comes to women, that number had been slowly moving in the NRA's favor -- and it's all part of a plan.</p><p>Four years ago, 30 percent of women<a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/04/25/more-support-for-gun-rights-gay-marriage-than-in-2008-or-2004/"> told</a> Pew that gun rights were more important to them than controlling gun ownership. This April, that number was 39 percent -- still less than the 60 percent of men who favored gun rights, but a dramatic rise nonetheless. And these women were likelier to be white; in the same poll, 57 percent of whites picked gun rights over gun control. African Americans and Latinos overwhelmingly told pollsters they preferred gun control.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_prettification_of_gun_culture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_prettification_of_gun_culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The latest war on single moms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_latest_war_on_single_moms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_latest_war_on_single_moms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earned Income Tax Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Tax Credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. is behind the world on support to single parents and their kids, and "Plan B" would make it worse]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States offers the worst support structure for single parents among all comparable countries -- and if anything like House Speaker John Boehner’s Plan B carries the day, it’s about to get worse.</p><p>Republicans used to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/19/us-usa-taxes-47percent-idUSBRE89I08T20121019">love</a> the earned income tax credit and the child tax credit, because they incentivized paid labor and used the tax code instead of cash assistance or programs to help low-income parents, most visibly single mothers. But that was before the cry against the 47 percent, a substantial portion of whom didn’t pay taxes because of such credits.</p><p>In the Washington Post, Jamelle Bouie <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2012/12/20/boehners-plan-b-would-redistribute-wealth-upwards/">points</a> to an <a href="http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&amp;id=3878#_ftn1">analysis</a> by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities showing that the two tax credits for low-income families will be slashed under Plan B: “A mother with two children who works full time at the minimum wage of $7.25 and earns $14,500 a year would lose $1,560 of her Child Tax Credit, which would plummet from $1,725 to $165.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_latest_war_on_single_moms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/the_latest_war_on_single_moms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How feminism caused Sandy Hook, according to the right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those on the right who would blame the tragedy on anything but guns see women as the problem -- not the heroes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dogged wish of many on the right to make the tragic Sandy Hook shooting about anything but guns means that it has to be about other things -- ideally, things they already do not like. Things like feminism, abortion or anything else that contributes to the oppression of white men, of which, you’ll note, murderous rampager Adam Lanza was one. And when it came to the last point, solipsism was not limited to the right. Here, a guide to the lowlights.</p><p><strong>Blame Obamacare and abortion. </strong>We heard, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/huckabee_blames_gays_for_the_newtown_massacre/">early out of the gate,</a> from Mike Huckabee, who didn’t wait for the funerals to start blaming the liberal banishment of God from schools and government, including “tax-funded abortion pills,” by which the Personhood proponent meant birth control. “We dismiss the notion of natural law and the notion that there are moral absolutes and seemed amazed when some kids make it their own morality to kill innocent children. We diminish and even hold in contempt <a href="http://mikehuckabee.com/mike-huckabee-news?ID=70415326-e438-41e4-9972-467097d2029f&amp;buffer_share=45810&amp;utm_source=buffer">the natural family of a father and mother </a>creating and then responsibly raising the next generation and then express dismay that kids feel no real connection to their families or even the concept of a family.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bobby Jindal doesn&#8217;t understand birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Louisiana governor tries to moderate his party's contraception stance, but gets his facts completely wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call off the culture war over birth control, left and right! Bobby Jindal has an <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578163120400999616.html">elegant solution</a> to rise above the fray. Or so he thinks.</p><p>Seizing on recommendations from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists that some hormonal birth control be available over the counter, the Louisiana governor and presumed presidential hopeful seeks to play them against the Affordable Care Act. He claims that Obama's big government is actually making it harder for women to access birth control, despite the fact that the ACOG recommendations would work best in tandem with the Affordable Care Act birth control provisions, not instead of them.</p><p>Making birth control more accessible in any way possible is generally a good idea. But in Jindal's haste to find "the end of birth control politics," he ignores some crucial benefits of the Affordable Care Act as well as the deep-seated opposition to many forms of birth control, not just insurance coverage of it, among his own allies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/bobby_jindal_doesnt_understand_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion deaths wildly underestimated</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savita Halapannavar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maternal Mortality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was worldwide news when a woman died in Ireland after being denied an abortion. She was hardly the only tragedy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, many have heard the name of Savita Halappanavar, whose death in a Galway hospital this fall was a chilling reminder of how abortion bans can be deadly.</p><p>That case had the benefit of a vocal and angry person to speak on the dead woman's behalf -- her husband, Praveen. He has said she requested a termination that may have saved her life -- but was told, "This is a Catholic country." (An official inquiry by the hospital has yet to be released, and Praveen Halapannavar is <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2012/1129/breaking33.html">appealing</a> to the European Court of Human Rights.) But for every Savita, there are thousands of women whose names we don't know, women who aren't even counted.</p><p>The most commonly cited statistic suggests that complications from unsafe abortions led to approximately 13 percent of maternal deaths worldwide. That's a World Health Organization figure first arrived at in 2000, which hasn't been re-evaluated. Every year, when WHO says how many women have died from unsafe abortions, they're simply taking the same percentage of the global maternal mortality figure -- 56,000 in 2003, or 47,000 in 2008. But one epidemiologist, Caitlin Gerdts, wondered if that number wasn't a potentially vast understatement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_many_savitas_have_there_been/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How abusers get away with targeting Indian women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deborah Parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charon Asetoyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native American women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House has delayed the Violence Against Women Act over a provision that would protect Native American women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"We have serial rapists on the reservation -- that are non-Indian -- because they know they can get away with it," said Charon Asetoyer, executive director of the Native American Women's Health Education Resource Center in Lake Andes, S.D. "Many of these cases just get dropped. Nothing happens. And they know they're free to hurt again."</p><p>Asetoyer was talking about the loophole that prevents tribal authorities, who have jurisdiction over crimes committed on Indian territory by Indians, from having any authority over non-Indian male abusers. That's despite the fact that non-Indian men account for an<a href="http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session21/A-HRC-21-47-Add1_en.pdf"> estimated 80 percent</a> of rapes of Indian women, and that the astronomical rate of abuse of Indian women is well documented by the federal government.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/how_abusers_get_away_with_targeting_indian_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t count out angry white guys quite yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_count_out_angry_white_guys_quite_yet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_count_out_angry_white_guys_quite_yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dems have a lot of leverage in the "fiscal cliff" standoff after the election. That doesn't mean the GOP yields]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, John Boehner opened his fiscal cliff counteroffer to President Obama by claiming that it had been a “status quo election in which both you and the Republican majority in the House were re-elected.” Democrats and progressives, who have spent the last month crowing about Republican’s self-marginalization as the party of aging white men, obviously beg to differ -- both about who holds the leverage in the ongoing tax rate and debt ceiling standoffs and how the election plays into it. Are they being overconfident, or will the Obama coalition we saw turn out a month ago hold?</p><p>As the last of the post-election data sifts and behind-the-scenes campaign reveals trickle out and the political class tries to figure out the new normal, it’s a good time to take stock.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_count_out_angry_white_guys_quite_yet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/dont_count_out_angry_white_guys_quite_yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s humblebrag: How to tell everyone you&#8217;re rich</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/obamas_humblebrag_how_to_tell_everyone_youre_rich/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/obamas_humblebrag_how_to_tell_everyone_youre_rich/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warren Buffett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president owns his privilege to argue for higher taxes on the rich -- like himself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney was never able to find the right way to talk about his money, but Barack Obama is happy to tell you that he's rich, again and again. That is, if he's asking for higher marginal taxes on the rich, whose ranks Obama first joined with book-related earnings and then with his $400,000 White House salary.</p><p>Obama said it again this week: "What the country needs … is an acknowledgment that folks like me can afford to pay a little bit higher rate," he <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-04/obama-says-boehner-fiscal-plan-is-out-of-balance-transcript-.html">told</a> Bloomberg News. He's been saying it at least since April 2011, when he was pushing the "Buffett rule":  "I don't need another tax cut," he said. "Warren Buffett doesn't need another tax cut."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/obamas_humblebrag_how_to_tell_everyone_youre_rich/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/obamas_humblebrag_how_to_tell_everyone_youre_rich/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ladies, Uncle Sam needs your uterus!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/ladies_uncle_sam_needs_your_uterus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/ladies_uncle_sam_needs_your_uterus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times' conservative columnist blames "late-modern exhaustion" for fertility decline. He's wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies of America, are you suffering from "late-modern exhaustion"? Have you been selfishly "shrugging off the basic sacrifices" of your patriotic childbearing duties, by which we mean sacrificing your own goals and aspirations? And more to the point, do you really need better access to affordable birth control and abortion when your "decadence" is already so efficiently bringing down American society?</p><p>Of course, when New York Times opinion columnist Ross Douthat filed his Sunday <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/opinion/sunday/douthat-the-birthrate-and-americas-future.html?_r=0">column</a> warning of the coming American demographic winter, he was too smart to so openly blame women's choices and feminism that way, or talk about women much at all. He knows the audience he's trying to persuade, which doesn't openly blame such things but does worry, in polite terms, about the U.S.'s toppling from its "global perch."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/ladies_uncle_sam_needs_your_uterus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/ladies_uncle_sam_needs_your_uterus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s next for the anti-abortion movement?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartbeat Bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After an election night thrashing, the movement hopes to make its message more palatable to the public]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohio's Heartbeat Bill, which would have banned abortion as early as six weeks, is dead, and it's all Mitt Romney's fault. So much for the heart-shaped <a href="http://christiannews.net/2012/11/28/ohio-republican-senate-president-tom-niehaus-stops-heartbeat-bill-and-move-to-defund-planned-parenthood/">balloons</a> and the circus-like spectacle of a fetus "testifying" in the form of a live ultrasound before the legislature. But can the state that remains a bellwether for presidential elections tell us what's to come in the next abortion-rights battles?</p><p>This week, Ohio's Republican Senate president, Tom Niehaus, explicitly took President Obama's win as a referendum on abortion rights, saying he'd told supporters that he would only allow a vote on the bill in the event of a Romney victory. He also said the bill's proponents were incredibly annoying, including to people ostensibly on their side.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/whats_next_for_the_anti_abortion_movement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fighting our new nanny economy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caregivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Domestic Workers Alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housekeepers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nannies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carework]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part-time work, low pay, no retirement benefits -- domestic workers are the next front for the labor movement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Job seekers, take note: Massive opportunities in a growing sector of the economy! Perks include low pay -- often below the state minimum wage -- no retirement or pension benefits, often no health insurance, a pretty significant likelihood of stress injuries, and lack of legal protections against harm in the workplace. As a bonus, you'll be told you're "part of the family" -- though what that actually means really depends on your employer's individual generosity.</p><p>Just take your pick from being a nanny, housekeeper or elder caregiver, the jobs included in a groundbreaking new study on domestic labor released this week, which surveyed over 2,000 domestic workers from around the country (and in nine different languages). Such jobs grew almost 10 percent between 2004 and 2010, according to census data, which didn't include related categories like cooks and chauffeurs. Ninety-five percent of such workers are female; they are overwhelmingly women of color and immigrants. (An actual, grim bonus: You can't be outsourced.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/fighting_our_new_nanny_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John McCain realizes GOP can&#8217;t win war on women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13107208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the GOP senator shies away from his remarks on abortion and Susan Rice, Patty Murray emerges as a Senate force]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John McCain sounded awfully <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/25/mccain_gop_has_to_offer_something_to_voters/">chastened</a> yesterday. Gone was the bluster of doing "everything in my power to block" Susan Rice from a position she has yet to be nominated for. He didn't question her competence. The rage gave way to this Sunday morning walkback: "I think she deserves the ability and the opportunity to explain herself and her position, just as she said. But, she's not the problem. The problem is the president of the United States."</p><p>I doubt McCain is done being an angry, bitter man who still hasn't forgiven Rice for her <a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/powergrid/susan-rice-secretary-of-state-2012-12/index1.html">attack</a> on him during the 2008 presidential campaign. But someone must have told him that trashing an accomplished, relatively young woman of color who wasn't even remotely responsible for what happened in Benghazi is just not a good look these days. Maybe McCain underestimated how many people had Rice's back, from the Congressional Black Caucus to the president himself -- just as his fellow party members had underestimated the power of the voting bloc they commanded on Nov. 6.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/26/john_mccain_realizes_gop_cant_win_war_on_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rove&#8217;s plan won&#8217;t work: Don&#8217;t count on Latino social conservatism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/roves_plan_wont_work_dont_count_on_latino_social_conservatism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/roves_plan_wont_work_dont_count_on_latino_social_conservatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latino vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13105042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans think it will be easy to come back -- just appeal to culturally conservative Latinos! It will fail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drop the anti-immigrant rhetoric! Focus on the "family values"<em> </em>that Latinos supposedly share with the party! But that magic solution to Republicans' demographic problem that some conservatives are touting — which conveniently allows the party to resist moderating on so-called social issues like gay marriage and abortion — is unlikely to pan out.</p><p>Two days after Latino voters broadly rejected the Republican Party, Charles Krauthammer saw reason for optimism. Latinos, he <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-the-way-forward/2012/11/08/6592e302-29d8-11e2-96b6-8e6a7524553f_story.html">said</a>, "should be a natural Republican constituency: striving immigrant community, religious, Catholic, family-oriented and socially conservative (on abortion, for example.)"  George W. Bush and Karl Rove found a way to approach 40 percent of the Latino vote; Romney barely netted half that. So Republicans, facing a demographic time bomb as their base of white men ages, have comforted themselves by thinking all they really need to do is perform as well as Bush did among Latinos to get near the White House again.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/roves_plan_wont_work_dont_count_on_latino_social_conservatism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/roves_plan_wont_work_dont_count_on_latino_social_conservatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>101</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still want to fight a war on women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tammy Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin win; Akin and Mourdock are defeated. But it's no time for women to be complacent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago, three words were <a href="http://upsettingrapeculture.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">projected</a> on the U.S. Capitol by a feminist group: "Rape is rape." It was momentous, but only to a point.</p><p>After all, by then President Obama had already <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57496599-503544/akin-apologizes-for-rape-comments-obama-says-rape-is-rape-/" target="_blank">repeated</a> that feminist mantra rejecting a hierarchy of rape: In August, he'd announced that "Rape is rape" in response to Todd Akin's blithe invocation of "legitimate rape." Three days after the words appeared on the Capitol, Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's talk of rape and God's gifts <a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/10/obama-on-mourdock-rape-is-rape-147149.html" target="_blank">gave</a> the president occasion to say it again. <em>Rape is rape.</em> You could complain that this was still being debated in 2012, and many did, but why would profound disruption come fast or easy? No, it was an urgent dividing point, and the president himself had chosen a side.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another year of the woman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/another_year_of_the_woman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/another_year_of_the_woman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Heitkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tammy Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Hassan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A record number of women running includes progressive stalwarts and a handful of right-wing wild cards ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this election year of "I love you women," of rape-parsing and slut-talk, a pretty notable fact has been overlooked: There are more women <a href="http://www.voanews.com/content/more-women-running-for-congress-than-ever-before/1538883.html">running</a> for Congress than ever before. And that includes remarkably progressive, path-breaking women -- like folk hero Elizabeth Warren in Massachusetts, or like Rep. Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin, who just might become the first lesbian senator -- as well as a host of far-right women, like the climate change-denying, anti-choice, anti-gay-marriage Deb Fischer, who is poised to beat Bob Kerrey for Nebraska's Senate seat. Oh, and Michele Bachmann, whose seat looked like it might be at risk, but who has led comfortably in <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/writeup/minnesota_6-29.html">recent polls</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/another_year_of_the_woman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/another_year_of_the_woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled antiabortion forces hope to pull it out for Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abortion opponents have had a lousy campaign, but they think they might be able to deliver Romney a key swing state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ohio over the weekend, an antiabortion protester <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/protesters-removed-obama-rally-shouting-during-speech-021402287--election.html">interrupted</a> an Obama event by shouting and holding a sign, upside down, that read, "This moral wrong should never be a constitutional right!" He was escorted out, and Obama made a joke about sports fans being peeved at a loss. But if you believe right-to-lifers, the man represented more than an isolated incident.</p><p>After years of public-relations and legislative wins, the anti-choice movement is sounding unusually defensive lately. All indications are that they've driven a lot of women into the Obama camp, further widening the much-discussed gender gap, and adopting the movement's aims has possibly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/">cost</a> Republicans the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>