<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > James Poniewozik</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/james_poniewozik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow TV Awards: James Poniewozik</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_james_poniewozik/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_james_poniewozik/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Blue Glow TV Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Poniewozik is the TV critic at Time magazine. He was Salon&#8217;s media critic, and was editor of the media section, from 1997 to 1999. James&#8217;s top 5: 1. &#8220;Parks and Recreation&#8221; (NBC) 2. &#8220;Louie&#8221; (FX) 3. &#8220;Homeland&#8221; (Showtime) 4. &#8220;Breaking Bad&#8221; (AMC) 5. &#8220;Mad Men&#8221; (AMC) Special Categories: 1. What was the show of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>James Poniewozik is the TV critic at Time magazine. <a href="http://www.salon.com/writer/james_poniewozik/">He was Salon's media critic</a>, and was editor of the media section, from 1997 to 1999.</em><strong id="internal-source-marker_0.7530723600648344"><br /> </strong></p><p><strong>James's top 5:</strong></p><p><strong>1. "Parks and Recreation"</strong> (NBC)<br /> <strong>2. "Louie"</strong> (FX)<br /> <strong>3. "Homeland"</strong> (Showtime)<br /> <strong>4. "Breaking Bad"</strong> (AMC)<br /> <strong>5. "Mad Men"</strong> (AMC)</p><p><strong>Special Categories:</strong></p><p><strong>1. What was the show of the year?</strong> It was No. 6 on my list, because of an uneven first season, but the show that will play on my mental highlight reel as defining 2012 will be "Girls." Great TV is about voice above all, and not only does Lena Dunham have it to spare, she found a way to translate it into a brutally funny, messy, moving treatment of a comedy antiheroine.</p><p><strong><strong>2. What was the best scene?</strong></strong> Can I have more than one? Drama category: Carrie's devastating, intimate interrogation of Brody in "Homeland's" "Q&amp;A." And comedy division: Leslie Knope and her campaign staff mincing across the skating rink at her campaign event in "Parks and Recreation's" "The Comeback Kid." Gloria Estefan's "Get on Your Feet" will make me laugh on command the rest of my life.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_james_poniewozik/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/blue_glow_tv_awards_james_poniewozik/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And a little scumbag shall lead them</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 1999 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/12/22/poni</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past week&#039;s news gush nearly tripped up attempts at year-end news wrap-ups, but James Poniewozik sees clearly: The big news this year was sex and the president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1">L</font>ast weekend, the  House of Representatives met in a special session to resolve one of the gravest matters ever put before it: selecting Time magazine's <a target="new" href="http://cgi.pathfinder.com/time/moy/index.html">Man of the Year.</a> At least that was the case if a gossip item in the New York Post was accurate -- that Time was standing by ready to name Hillary Clinton Woman of the Year if impeachment failed, and, failing a vote by press time, home-run king Mark McGwire.</p><p>It was a week to boggle the mind, a week to make history -- a week, in short, to totally fuck up year-in-review roundups. Forget politics stopping at the water's edge; the principle that was truly upended this past week is that no real news should occur between  Dec. 15 and Jan. 2. Then again, the last week in the news really <i>was</i> the year in the news, what with the simultaneous climaxes of the impeachment story and the bombing of -- oh, you know, that luminous green country with no people in it. Why bother rounding up 1998? We spent a year there last week.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/12/22/poni_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rosebud</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/28/farewell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/28/farewell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/28/farewell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A last word on last words, and on the media we love to hate to love.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he thing about famous last words is there aren't many. "Rosebud" hardly counts, since it was written by a screenwriter who was probably thinking not of his final end but about when he'd be able to knock off work and go get properly loaded. Bartlett's gives a few "attributed" bon mots for Tolstoy, Dickinson, Wilde, etc., which, tellingly, suddenly thin out with the advent of recording technology. Even Christ was a mixed bag: In Matthew and Mark he howls, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" -- a closure-denying humdinger of an exit -- but Luke and John give him the flat "Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit!" and the even flatter "It is finished." (Any of the three, in any event, being undercut by the speaker's getting two encores in the New Testament.)</p><p>The dying, however, at least have the excuse of ill preparation and understandable stress. The living, compelled to offer a sign-off, are on the hook. All of which is to say that I have no proper, Wildean or Wellesian last words to offer you in my last media column for Salon: no big catchy answer, grand wrap-up, fiery, Old Testament jeremiad. Partly because I'm too young to have the perspective and too old to have the arrogance to do it. Partly because I'm not retiring, just moving on to do related writing for a <a target="new" href="http://www.time.com">different master.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/28/farewell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/28/farewell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toto, I&#039;m not Dave Kansas anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/21/tycoons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/21/tycoons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/21/tycoons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what&#039;s wrong with Web journalists becoming stock tycoons?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>'m moving in the wrong direction. The revolving door is spinning so fast into online media -- 'scuse me, <a target="new" href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/en/story.html?s=v/nm/19990609/en/television-cnn1stld_1.html">Mr. Dobbs!</a> pardon, <a target="new" href="http://www.drkoop.com">Dr. Koop!</a> hey, <i>watch the elbows,</i> <a target="new" href="http://foreignTV.com/">Mr. Arnett!</a> -- one can hardly get through the other way. I am, however, leaving Salon; next month, I'm going to Time magazine to write about television. [Note to copy editor: insert here that malicious and inaccurate attack on Henry Luce that we discussed last week. -- Ed.] In so doing, I willingly forfeited a chance to attend my generation's Woodstock: being part of a gen-u-ine Internet initial public offering.</p><p>This is not a lament: The IPO was announced long before I jumped, and I was hardly going to buy a country -- certainly not a <i>good</i> country -- with my minor stake in it. What's a little sad, really, is that I'll be missing out on my little piece of the 1999 Zeitgeist, the chance, when I'm gray and doddering, to be like one of those old guys who really <i>did</i> do the Charleston and swallow goldfish in the '20s. More important, even though I wouldn't have been Croesus-ized, I could have at least let people <i>think</i> I had. Now I will not have the chance to be mentioned in a Dave Kansas conversation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/21/tycoons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/21/tycoons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Riding shotgun</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/oj/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/oj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/17/oj</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five years ago Thursday, a white Bronco rolled onto an L.A. freeway -- and ran over the barriers between the media and everybody else.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f I had to thank or blame someone for my becoming a media critic, I suppose it would have to be Mr. Higgins. That, anyway, was the imaginative pseudonym employed by a gentleman who called Peter Jennings during a certain live ABC special report five years ago Thursday. Mr. Higgins purported to have knowledge about a certain man inside a certain automobile, knowledge that Jennings and you and I lacked, that we were all achingly watching a video feed for, that Jennings and his producers would, understandably, have loved to be the first ones to air.</p><p>O.J. Simpson, Mr. Higgins reported, was slumped down in his Bronco in the driveway of his home; we couldn't see him, from our helicopter-cam vantage point, but Mr. Higgins said he could. Was he still alive? Did he really have a gun? Was he pointing it at anyone? "I see O.J.," Mr. Higgins told Jennings. "He looks scared." Then he announced, "Baba Booey to y'all!" and cut out.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/oj/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/17/oj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caviar culture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/caviar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/caviar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/14/caviar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How long will the masses be able to afford mass media?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>E</b>ntertainment Weekly, which discovers and obsesses over television shows with a serial lover's passion -- take its torrid mid-'90s fling with "Friends," whose number the magazine recently <a target="new" href="http://cgi.pathfinder.com/r0/ew/Complete_EW/in?/ew/archive/1,1798,1|25958|0|Friends,00.html?name1=Friends&lastresult=0&query=%22Friends%22+%3CIN%3E+MAJOR+%3CAND%3E+%5FSTYLE%3D%2Fexport%2Fverity%2Fcollections%2Fewlib%2Fstyle%2Fstyle%2Eddd&major_ref=ON&mtype=0&list_size=25&direction=">pulled back out</a> of its little black book for old times' sake -- has now turned on to "The Sopranos." EW teased a preview package for the HBO Mafia series's encore summer run on its cover -- including an A-to-Z glossary, the EW equivalent of the Congressional Medal of Honor.</p><p>EW isn't alone; the show's just-opened curtain call is receiving perhaps the greatest huzzahs ever to greet a summer of reruns. (The Washington Post's Tom Shales writes, "Some reruns do seem too grand for the term 'rerun.'") Tom Carson in Esquire hailed the rer -- sorry, <i>encores</i> -- last month; more recently, Stephen Holden wrote in the New York Times, "It just may be the greatest work of American popular culture of the last quarter century," which in turn may be the greatest work of critical hyperbole in, oh, the past couple weeks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/caviar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/caviar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://phc.mpr.org/performances/19990130/rafiles/990130_powdermilkbiscuits_28.ram" length="0" type="audio/x-realaudio" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please Mr. Link Man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/10/weblogs_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/10/weblogs_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/10/weblogs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalism big shots are pleading for the attention of one drowsy guy in St. Paul. James Romenesko discusses the power of indie weblogs and how he found the bogus millionaire-dog story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Y</b>ou could call this column a shameless plea for James Romenesko's attention. I probably would. But it wouldn't be the first one. At <a target="new" href="http://www.obscurestore.com/">the Obscure Store and Reading Room</a> and its new offshoot, <a target="new" href="http://www.mediagossip.com/">MediaGossip.com,</a> Romenesko directs 5,000 to 7,000 readers a day to bizarre news items and media-biz tidbits across the Web. He exemplifies a trend in online publishing: the increasing influence of metajournalistic referrer sites, from major commercial enterprises like <a target="new" href="http://www.zdnet.com/yil/content/depts/netbuzz/">Yahoo Internet Life</a> to weblogs (link-list pages) like Romenesko's. A well-placed link means thousands of page views, which mean bucks, and online publications, smelling the traffic like your dog smells ground chuck in the groceries, have started "suggesting" stories to such sites -- flacking them by e-mail, in some cases dedicating staff members to the job.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/10/weblogs_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/10/weblogs_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cokie Roberts for president!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/06/journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/06/journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/06/journalists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columnist Ann Coulter may try to get Connecticut voters to take her home, while broadcaster Pat Buchanan and editor Steve Forbes are running again. But is a media perch really a political asset?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>hink you're man enough for Ann Coulter? Dream on, pretty boy, dream on. Since President Clinton's acquittal, the lawyer and pro-impeachment pundit has sought to establish herself as a serious political commentator for all seasons, a cause she advanced in her George column this month by posing in a miniskirt on a barstool and complaining about how hard it is to get a date in the capital: "Boys in Washington," she says, "don't know how to ask." (Curiously, they seem to find acid-spewing ideologues intimidating.)</p><p>Her love life notwithstanding, Coulter has been busily flirting with political office, giving substance to long-flying rumors that she would challenge Connecticut Rep. Christopher Shays in the Republican primary. She declared May 24 on C-Span's "Washington Journal" that "someone will run (against Shays), and it might be me," and her July column, George editor Richard Blow said, will be "about the temptations of running."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/06/journalists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/06/journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America threatened by outbreak of taste!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/03/taste/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/03/taste/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/03/taste</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post-Littleton, post-Jenny, post-"I&#039;m Proud to Be a Prostitute," the media, willing or not, are getting <i>classy.</i> Spare us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just over a year ago that, amid the disillusion and rancor engendered by an impeachment battle in Washington, an ambitious young man named Stephen Glass taught America to laugh again. Far from acting alone, the New Republic fabricator was simply the most entertainingly outlandish in a series of journalistic <a href="/media/poni/1998/05/27poni.html">supervillains</a> -- liars, hypers, thieves -- and scandals that would continue through the summer with Mike Barnicle, Patricia Smith and the CNN/Time "Tailwind" debacle. It was the spring, and then the summer, of shame, and pretty soon we advance-ordered a whole series of calendars on the theme: We wondered what the media industry would do to top itself, but never doubted it would manage to.</p><p>So imagine our surprise that a year later the headlines are filled with media enterprises cleaning up their acts, or at least being handed a mop by the judge. Police perp walks for the cameras were struck down in court. Jenny Jones was hit with a $25 million judgment. The Supreme Court prevented reality-TV shows from accompanying police into private homes (and, just Tuesday, <a target="new" href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/ts/story.html?s=v/nm/19990601/ts/court_cnn_1.html">rejected</a> a related appeal from CNN). TV episodes and entire series have been yanked for violence, while TV wrestling was essentially accused of murdering a man when wrestler Owen Hart died in a stunt accident: "Fatal fall blamed on competing cable shows," read one headline.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/03/taste/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/03/taste/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The great American garage sale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/01/ebay_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/01/ebay_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/06/01/ebay</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks to Ebay, "Antiques Roadshow" and their ilk, cleaning out the attic
is now a national sport.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>P</b>rosperous nations find a lot of things to spend their money on -- pyramids, ziggurats, spices, silks, opium.<br /> But it's fair to say that, until now, used<br /> shoe horns were not high on the list. Yet today our historic economic boom is looking like a<br /> nationwide garage sale, with consumers patronizing auction sites, hobbyists' magazines and TV antiques and crafts shows to turn themselves into merchants and convert their free minutes into cash. In 1997, the clichi went, you were <a target="new" href="http://www.brandyou.com">a brand;</a> in 1999, you're the whole damn store.</p><p>People have always collected and traded; what's different today is the degree of intensity and<br /> mercantilism. Everything -- Grandma's punch bowl, the kids' Furbies -- is now a potential profit source;<br /> everyone either is a seller or ought to be thinking damn hard about it. When "The Phantom Menace" came out, for instance, collecting experts advised not to expect a big payoff from saving Darth Maul figurines in the original packages -- because everybody else has already had the same idea. Twenty years ago, relatively few people kept unopened Star Wars toys; today, why else would you buy one? (Think how many fools bought Pet<br /> Rocks and actually opened the boxes!)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/01/ebay_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/01/ebay_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV to over-49s: You haven&#039;t dropped dead yet?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/27/oldsters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/27/oldsters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/05/27/oldsters</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, Gramps! Want more
TV shows aimed at you? Then stop watching them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Y</b>ou can learn everything you need to know about media by reading the<br /> ads in advertising magazines -- the meta-ads, that is, the ones that<br /> advertise media outlets to advertisers. The ads read eerily like mid-1700s New<br /> Orleans auction posters: "CourtTV captures women 18-49 ... CourtTV<br /> has them locked up." E! network? "We've got those upscale 18-49<br /> year-olds." Entertainment Weekly? "Over 8 million trend-setting,<br /> free-spending, cool-worshipping pop-culture vultures. Ours, all<br /> ours." And the barking in this flesh trade gets louder the younger<br /> the bodies are; a quasi-pederastic trade ad for Seventeen shows an<br /> onyx-haired, smokily staring nymphet lying in a field: "She's the one<br /> you want. She's the one we've got."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/27/oldsters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/27/oldsters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will RealAudio kill the radio star?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/24/radio_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/24/radio_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/05/24/radio</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial radio will have only itself to blame if the Internet ends up eating its pablum lunch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>L</b>ike not a few people I know, I pretty much stopped listening to radio after I moved to New York. (Hereinafter "radio" excludes public radio, a genre which, in New York anyway, is largely a magazine for people with busy hands and eyeballs.) With a few exceptions, the 10-hits-all-the-time sameness of what this bumpkin had naively assumed would be a cooler radio market left me nostalgic even for the Detroit area's mediocre offerings.</p><p>I'm not saying there's no decent radio in New York, though its quality is inversely proportional to its receivability in my apartment (like free-form <a target="new" href="http://www.wfmu.org/">WFMU,</a> which I have to catch online). And I freely admit I'm making gross generalizations. But gross generalization is what makes or breaks radio, by its passive nature: You turn on the radio to <i>leave</i> it on, so if you find a station -- or the entire radio palette -- disappointing in general, you're not going to turn it on at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/24/radio_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/24/radio_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children should be interpreted and not heard</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/georgia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/georgia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/log/1999/05/20/georgia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Georgia shooting is sure to inspire another torrent of clueless media tea-leaf reading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>mmediately after an act of violence, there is a blessed and brief moment of lingering senselessness. As I start this article, Thursday morning, little is known about the boy who shot up a high school in Conyers, Ga.; even as I type it, details are coming out; by the time you read it, very likely, we will know, yet again, exactly what is wrong with America: his clothes, his parents, his music, his weaponry, his school, his movies, his elected representatives. (Or, of course, the refusal of the media to suppress news of school violence to avoid copycat incidents.)</p><p>It was only minutes after news of the shooting broke that news outlets started turning to Conyers students for their voices and details. What was the kid like? "He always talks in class, and he's always disturbing people." Yet, "He seemed quiet. He'd never do anything like this." But of course, "We weren't surprised." Cable-news reporters reached out to teens in Georgia and even in Columbine for quotable, Trench-Coat-able details: Who were his friends? What were his interests? Why is this happening to your generation?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/georgia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/georgia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where&#039;s a crazy billionaire when you need one?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/05/20/campaign</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daddy Warbucks! The American media wants you ... to run for president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>f the rest of you don't mind excusing us for a moment, I'd like to address the crazy billionaires in the audience.</p><p>I know you're busy people -- what with the businesses to run, the employees to surveil, the FBI disrupting your children's weddings and so forth. But have you at least <i>considered</i> a third-party run for president? You there! Reading "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"! Have you no sense of civic duty?</p><p>You may never see a better opportunity. Since the impeachment drama ended, leaving a news vacuum for a long-running story, the political media has confronted the possibility that the designated substitute -- the 2000 primaries -- may be over months before they technically begin. Amid the ensuing ennui, which will only get worse, any half-interesting freelance loon will receive a grateful groundswell of attention that will make Colin Powell's near acclamation in 1996 look like a public stoning. Your only limits are your <a target="new" href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/pl/story.html?s=v/nm/19990513/pl/politics_corzine_2.html">bank account</a> and your willingness to go off your medication!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/20/campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael and you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/18/moore_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/18/moore_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/log/1999/05/18/moore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PR pros offer tips on what to do when Michael Moore suddenly drops by the office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Install an ejection seat behind your desk? Pile a table by the entrance with complimentary, barbiturate-laced apple fritters? Noble ideas all, but not what PRWeek magazine recently recommended in a feature instructing the professional corporate mouthpiece on what to do should Michael Moore show up at your office.</p><p>The filmmaker and satirist, as is well known to fans of his films "Roger and Me" and "The Big One," has made a career of speaking truth to power -- well, not usually to power, but to the professional punching bags with whom the wise power surrounds itself. With the advent of his new TV show, <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/col/mill/1999/04/19/moore/index.html">"The Awful Truth"</a> -- in which, notably, he confronted an HMO with a mock funeral for a patient for whom it had denied coverage -- one would assume a heightened readiness among the public relations profession, given Moore's weekly platform from which to make them take bullets for their bosses.</p><p>"It didn't take long to come up with a number of PR pros who had encountered him," said PRWeek's Jonah Bloom, who wrote the feature. "To be honest, experienced crisis PR pros are very unlikely to panic about an essentially humorous program -- it's their clients that panic."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/18/moore_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/18/moore_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Rall World</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/17/editorial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/17/editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/05/17/editorial</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ted Rall, the cartoonist laureate of bitterness, talks about class, baby boomers, "soft liberals" and why editorial cartoons really, really suck.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>he first thing I noticed about <a target="new" href="http://www.rall.com/index.html">Ted Rall,</a> meeting him at Yaffa Cafe in the East Village, was not his height (about 6-foot-2), his general countenance (he denies this, but there's a slight resemblance to Bill Bradley when he arches his brow) or his attire (default New York black, top to bottom): It was that his eyes, surprisingly, are almost perfectly lined up with one another. The syndicated editorial cartoonist and columnist (his work appears in over 100 dailies and weeklies, plus Time and Fortune magazines) draws distinctively blockheaded characters whose eyes are as misaligned with each other as their expectations are with their realities. Overworked, insecure, morally numb, given to <a target="new"> href="http://www.uexpress.com/ups/opinion/cartoon/tr/rallcom/1997/04/tr970421.html">blasi violence</a> and beset with a <a target="new" href="http://www.uexpress.com/ups/opinion/cartoon/tr/art/1999/04/tr9904178287.gif">vague sense of dread,</a> his characters reflect the abiding and intensely personal bitterness he describes in his recent prose/cartoon manifesto, "Revenge of the Latchkey Kids."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/17/editorial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/17/editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alex Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/jones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/jones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/lunch/1999/05/14/jones</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pulitzer Prize-winning host of PBS&#039;s "Media Matters" eats lobster  while explaining how  he fled from, then embraced, the family business -- newspapers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex Jones' hands have poured molten lead. Dressed now in Levi's and an<br /> open-collar shirt, the uniform of the amiable urban family guy, he<br /> hardly looks like a heavy-machinery operator. But when he was 9 or<br /> 10 years old, the son of a small-town newspaper publisher,<br /> he worked a Linotype machine, pouring off lead from melted-down<br /> type into metal casts -- "things that you'd get arrested for now, I<br /> think, if you had a child that age doing them."</p><p>Jones went on to become a Pulitzer Prize-winning New York Times media reporter, author and host of public radio's "On the Media" (1993-97) and PBS's  "Media Matters." But he started his career literally <i>making</i> the news: keying in "slugs" when the term meant a metal bar of type and not a short phrase summarizing an article. I thought about this a little when I shook his hand  at the end of our lunch, realizing that I was going home to type my account on a nicely cushioned keyboard, in an ergonomically correct chair, where I would risk, at worst, a cramp, but not, oh, let's say, a searing geyser of magma.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/jones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/jones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The hooker with a heart of gold</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/13/hooker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/13/hooker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/05/13/hooker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[USA Today has gotten flak for selling ads on its front page -- but at least its money-grubbing is right out there for all to see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here is a case to be made for never, ever, reading a news report in which a dean of a journalism school is quoted, unless the article involves, say, a high-class call-girl ring run out of a graduate J-school. That case was bolstered last week when USA Today announced it would begin selling ads, beginning Oct. 1, in the one-inch color band at the bottom of its front page. Orville Schell, journalism dean at UC-Berkeley, told the New York Times he was troubled by "the direction [the ads] suggest. My view is that big serious newspapers of record -- or even not of record -- are something like schools, churches, national parks. They should not be completely enslaved to the imperatives of larger and larger profits."</p><p>It's not quite made clear what precisely pains Schell about USA Today's decision, but we can venture a guess. Ads on Page 1 are no different, in terms of editorial corruption, from ads on Page 2. But they're pink flamingos on the steps of the Met. They're unseemly. They're not what <a href="http://www.salon.com/media/1999/01/cov_27mediaa.html">our kind of people</a> do. They appear -- to quote the coverage in both the Washington Post and the Chicago Tribune -- "cheesy." And I for one applaud USA Today for introducing them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/13/hooker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/13/hooker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Turn of the Century&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/11/andersen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/11/andersen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/1999/05/11/andersen</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kurt Andersen&#039;s little big novel of the New York media world searches the noise for signal -- and finds it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>here is a millenarian doomsday premise behind Kurt Andersen's "Turn of the Century" far spookier than the "Left Behind" series of Christian Armageddon thrillers or an entire shelf of <a href="/21st/books/1998/03/cov_02books.html">Ed Yourdon</a> Y2K doomsaying tomes: What if, come Jan. 1, 2000 ... nothing happens? What if, in the cruel aftermath of the odometer's turn, we wake to find abundant electricity? What if telephones, televisions, modems -- all the tools we rely on to live -- still work? What if Christ does not return, the dial tone does return and civilization spirals inexorably into a state of further civilization? What if 2000 is just like 1999, but even more so?</p><p>There is no global panic in Kurt Andersen's year 2000, just more Internet IPOs, reality television and a successful new theme park called BarbieWorld. No famine, just a general anomie pundits in USA Today are calling "third millennium malaise." No Rapture, just a <a href="/books/sneaks/1998/01/06review.html">Dolly-like</a> science <i>scandale</i> involving electronic brain implants to make cats telepathic. And there's no riot and revolution (except for a bit of unpleasantness in Mexico that barely grazes the American consciousness), but the <a href="/21st/rose/1998/01/22straight.html">New Yorker columnist</a> and <a href="/media/1998/02/18media.html">Spy magazine founder</a> has set this hyper-sharp satire of business, media and manners among that class of people who, had they come, would have been first up against the wall: the broadcasting, finance and technology professionals who through lunches and pulled-from-the-ass brainstorms determine the obsessions and dreams of the global consumeriat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/11/andersen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/11/andersen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The literature of exhaustion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/10/fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/10/fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/poni/1999/05/10/fast</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fast Company isn&#039;t just a magazine -- it&#039;s the workaholic bible for manic white-collar types too wired -- and scared -- to slow down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>T</b>ech-fluent, community-oriented, untiringly committed to work, work, work, the white-hot business magazine Fast Company is one of a handful of artifacts you would have to put in your cultural time capsule of the 1990s. If you had time to make a time capsule, which -- silly me! -- of course you don't. You're too busy Building Your Brand, Creating Your Wow Project, Joining the Free-Agent Nation.</p><p>Fast Company understands this. And that's why Fast Company is one of the smartest -- and scariest -- magazines around.</p><p>The National Magazine Award Fast Company received last month capped off an incredible first three years. The month before, Advertising Age named it Magazine of the Year; its ad pages jumped more than 50 percent in a year, and its circulation jumped from 100,000 to over 250,000. And like any hot start-up nowadays, it may cash in while the cash-in's good; owner Mort Zuckerman is reportedly shopping the magazine around, possibly to Condi Nast or another empire.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/10/fast/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/10/fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
