Jeevan Vasagar

Hunted by death squads, a people without hope

In Darfur more than 1 million people have been displaced by fighting, many of them fleeing after attacks on villages by the Janjaweed, a militia armed by the Sudanese government and supported by its army and air force.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Hawa Abdullahi’s father pulls back her orange shawl to show where a bullet smashed through her upper arm. The 15-year-old girl is in pain and traumatised, but in her family she is the fortunate one. Four of her brothers are dead after an attack they blame on the Janjaweed. “Maybe God knows why this happened,” said Maryam Ayacoub Solomon, the mother of the murdered boys. “I don’t know. I don’t know what to say — I have no words left.”

Every few days, more refugees from Darfur cross the border into eastern Chad. They all tell the same story; in recent days and weeks, there have been fresh attacks on black African villages involving Janjaweed fighters backed up by Sudanese government troops.

Despite a UN security council resolution demanding that Sudan disarms the Janjaweed, Khartoum’s war against its own people goes on.

UN officials say that 11 villages close to the border with Chad are believed to have been cleared in a campaign that began a few days after the security council resolution was passed.

Nearly 500 refugees have been registered by the UN after crossing the border at Senett, near the village of Birak in eastern Chad.

Abdel Moula Abdullahi, 25, told the Guardian he had escaped an attack on Diba village in west Darfur on August 9. “They came at 6am. It was raining and everyone was in the village,” he said. “The women cried out: ‘The Janjaweed are coming’.

“The men and women ran from the village. As they were running, the Janjaweed were shooting.

“The Sudanese military came with five vehicles. They shot the people with machine guns. The Janjaweed threw hand grenades to burn down our houses.”

Mr Abdullahi’s home now is a piece of plastic sheeting spread over a framework of branches, with a handful of possessions inside; blackened cooking pans, a dagger and an ancient plastic tub of blue hair gel. There is a waist-high stockade of branches to keep animals out.

Another refugee, Osman Yahya Khadir, 52, escaped an attack on Gazmoun village last Wednesday. According to his account, Sudanese military helicopters circled in the sky overhead while Janjaweed attacked on the ground.

“When I heard the noise of the helicopters, I ran to hide in the mountains, because I knew the Janjaweed would come,” said Mr Khadir, a tall man in a long, white robe.

“I knew from the other villages that it had happened like that. They told me: ‘When you hear the helicopters and the planes, the Janjaweed are coming’.

“We drove our herds of animals towards the mountains. The Janjaweed came to take our animals and killed five people.” Both these villages have previously been attacked by Janjaweed and government forces, and their inhabitants had fled to Chad.

In recent months, some refugees had returned across the border to rebuild their lives, but renewed attacks have killed or driven away those who went back to Darfur.

Mr Abdullahi, dressed in a khaki green tunic and ragged green trousers, said: “The first time we were attacked was one year ago. Aeroplanes dropped bombs, and there were Janjaweed on horses and soldiers in cars. My father and my father’s brother were killed.

“One month ago, we returned to our village. Everything was destroyed and we rebuilt it all. We only had one or two cows left.

“The government of Sudan sent envoys to Chad to say it is safe to return, and we believed they were telling the truth because they were the state.”

As he speaks, sitting on a straw mat flanked by a group of male refugees, the low growling of an Antonov plane’s engines becomes audible. The men fall silent; the Russian-built planes are the favoured bombers of the Sudanese government.

Many of the refugees are members of the Djabar tribe, which has not played a large part in the Darfur rebellion.

Although there are rebel strongholds to the north and south of the region which has recently come under attack, there is no significant rebel activity in or near these villages.

Instead, the motive for the Janjaweed appears to be an opportunity to acquire the livestock of the black villagers and steal their land.

It is harder to understand why the government continues to back the Janjaweed when there is no rebellion to crush. The refugees believe it is because the regime in Khartoum is racist.

Mr Abdullahi said: “The government of Sudan doesn’t want blacks, they want only Arabs.

“Before the first attack, some Arabs in the region came to tell us: ‘We’re going to send you blacks away and claim this land for ourselves’.”

The landscape of eastern Chad is a mirror image of Darfur. With the rainy season, a transformation has taken place, and a countryside of barren sand, rock and straggling bushes wears a thin covering of green, as if it has been freshly painted.

Herds of camels, goats and cattle are accompanied by wobbly calves, greedily cropping the grass before the dry season returns.

But the refugees say their lands in Darfur were far more fertile than the border region.

Their rival Arab tribes want the land “because the land of Darfur is rich, and there are many animals, plenty of riches, oil under the ground,” said one refugee.

Hundreds of refugees have now fled across the border once again. But even here, they claim, they are being pursued by the Janjaweed.

On August 12, a family of refugees was sleeping in a stockade of branches at Senett when they were fired on. It was then that Hawa Abdullahi was shot through the arm and her brothers, aged 12, 15, 18 and 21, were killed or fatally injured.

Hawa said: “I was sleeping when I heard something in the night. Before I could ask my brothers what it was, there was gunfire. I got up straightaway, then I was hit in the arm and cried out for my mother.”

According to Hawa’s father, Abdullahi Ibrahim, who ran from his sleeping place to the scene of the shooting, the gunman escaped with an accomplice who was holding their horses. They fled in the direction of Sudan.

“This did not happen because they wanted to steal from us,” Mr Ibrahim said. “But because this is the manner in which they treat our people.”

Under a burning sun, Mr Ibrahim, a barefoot man in a tattered green robe, goes to pray over three mounds of sandy yellow earth covered in branches. Three of his sons lie there, while a fourth lies dead at a clinic in nearby Birak.

Fresh green shoots of grass have sprung from the base of each mound, though they are only a week old.

This should be a time of rejoicing and renewal for the black farmers of Darfur; when the long-awaited rains bring the promise of new life. But this year the rainy season is only bringing more death.

Sudan accepts UN plan

Government halts military action against villages, allows humanitarian work to continue.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Sudan appeared yesterday to have bowed to international pressure over Darfur as the UN announced an agreed plan to tackle the refugee crisis and avert sanctions.

The UN special envoy to the country, Jan Pronk, said the Sudanese government had halted military action against villages in Darfur and lifted restrictions on humanitarian assistance.

Last Friday, the UN security council gave Sudan 30 days to disarm the Janjaweed, the Arab militias deployed by the government to suppress a revolt in Darfur.

Mr Pronk told reporters in Khartoum: “The government of Sudan has to be commended for keeping its promise [on action in Darfur]. We have full access and we have to make full use of this opportunity by coming in with more food, more planes, more trucks, more medication.”

He said he had agreed a series of measures with the Sudanese government and sanctions could be averted if there was substantial progress.

But the US secretary of state, Colin Powell, said yesterday Khartoum still had work to do to meet the UN’s ultimatum.

He wrote in the Wall Street Journal that while the government had removed obstacles to humanitarian access, it “has not, however, taken decisive steps to end the violence”.

Francis Deng, a UN representative, said: “Contrary to official statements about improvement of the security situation and the voluntary return of the displaced, I found _ persistent insecurity and human rights violations.”

While access had improved in some cases, “administrative obstacles”, such as limited visas, hampered relief work.

In Kalma refugee camp, in south Darfur, the UN reported violent disturbances on Sunday after a government official tried to persuade refugees to go back home. Police opened fire on refugees, including a man crippled by polio, and were then driven out of the camp. The Sudanese authorities blocked entrances to the camp in the standoff. Refugees told the UN 50 men from the camp were driven away in lorries.

With international attention focused on Darfur, the Sudan is anxious to reverse the ethnic “cleansing” of the province. But refugees who have agreed to return home have come under renewed attack from the Janjaweed fighters. The Janjaweed are settling their families in the emptied villages as a reward for their role in the counter-insurgency action in Darfur.

Further attacks have been reported to the UN in west Darfur. In recent days, a girl was raped while she was collecting firewood and a woman and boy were shot by militiamen who looted livestock in the Ardamata refugee camp.

The UN is also concerned about donor cash. Britain is the leading cash donor in Darfur, but other EU governments have been slow to respond. There are an estimated 1.2 million internal refugees in Darfur, and 120,000 who have fled to Chad.

Continue Reading Close

Sudan throws anti-UN rally

Tens of thousands show up at a government-sponsored protest against increased troop presence.

  • more
    • All Share Services

Tens of thousands of demonstrators chanting anti-American slogans marched on the UN headquarters in Khartoum yesterday to protest against western troops being sent in to deal with the crisis in Darfur.

The government-sponsored rally took place as the African Union said it would increase troop deployment in Darfur from 300 to 2,000.

The Sudanese government has raised fears of a western intervention in Darfur, although no western country has pledged to send troops.

More than 100,000 protesters gathered in central Khartoum and shouted slogans attacking America and the UN, which has given Sudan 30 days to disarm the Janjaweed, the predominantly Arab militias whose murder, rape and arson has driven more than a million people from their homes. The Sudanese government has used the militias to help suppress a rebellion.

“Annan, Annan, you coward,” demonstrators shouted, referring to the UN secretary general, Kofi Annan. “We will not be ruled by Americans.”

A senior member of Sudan’s ruling National Congress party, Mohammed Ali Abdullah, told the crowd their protest was a warning to George Bush and Tony Blair against invading Sudan.

“Targeting Sudan means you will fall into a third swamp – after Afghanistan and Iraq. There are lions here in Sudan which would like to confront the Americans,” he said.

At the UN building the protesters handed in a statement accusing Mr Annan of collaborating with the US and Israel in “expressing enmity to Sudan”. Mr Annan drew the world’s attention to Darfur in April when he expressed “grave concern” over the scale of human rights abuses.

The statement told the UN leader: “You … hold all the responsibility for escalating the crisis in Darfur as your remarks formed the basis of the misleading, antagonistic western propaganda against Sudan.”

Yesterday’s demonstration was sponsored by the Sudanese regime, which has suppressed anti-government protests about the plight of Darfur’s African tribes.

In June Sudanese security forces opened fire on students trying to deliver a petition about Darfur to the UN. At least five were injured.

As international pressure on Sudan has mounted, the regime has compared itself to Iraq in the run-up to war and raised fears that the west plans to invade another Arab state.

Sudan’s armed forces spokesman, General Mohammed Bashir Suleiman, this week described the security council resolution as “a declaration of war against Sudan and its people” and warned of a jihad against foreign troops.

Gen Suleiman said the 30-day deadline was “a preparatory period” for war against his country, which was “being targeted by foreign powers”.

Although Downing Street is looking at military options, no western country has committed itself to armed intervention and none of the 300 troops promised by the African Union has arrived.

Yesterday the union said Nigeria and Rwanda had offered to raise the strength of their contingent. The force aims to protect the union’s ceasefire monitors rather than the refugees, although a spokesman said yesterday its mandate may be widened to a peacekeeping role.

Continue Reading Close

Page 2 of 2 in Jeevan Vasagar