<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jefferson Morley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jefferson_morley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Francis Scott Key on trial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/francis_scott_key_on_trial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/francis_scott_key_on_trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star-Spangled Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12949917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Land of the free? Remembering when the man who penned "The Star-Spangled Banner" defended slavery]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the final two days of <em>U.S. v. Reuben Crandall</em>, on April 25 and 26, 1836, Washington's district attorney, Francis Scott Key, and defense attorney Richard Coxe addressed the jurors for the last time. The courtroom in City Hall in Judiciary Square was thronged with spectators. Congressmen jockeyed for seats along with national newspaper correspondents. The crowds had come to see Key’s case against the abolitionist movement. Just as the slaveholders’ representatives on Capitol Hill were noisily seeking  a “gag rule” to prevent debate over slavery on the floor of Congress, so did Key, the famous author of "The Star Spangled Banner," seek to silence those who would agitate for freedom on the streets of Washington City. In the trial of New York doctor Reuben Crandall, he hoped to defeat the antislavery men in the court of public opinion.  The abolitionist, in turn, hoped to discredit Key, sneering about his hometown, "Land of the Free …. Home of the Oppressed."</p><p>The debate between Key and Coxe crystallized how radical new ideas of rights introduced by the free people of color and their white allies in the early 1830s had galvanized popular thinking in America. These ideas  divided Americans into two broad political tendencies that would endure into the 21st century. Key and Coxe were exemplars of what we now know as red and blue politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/francis_scott_key_on_trial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/07/04/francis_scott_key_on_trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drones spur debt and polio</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/drones_spur_debt_and_polio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/drones_spur_debt_and_polio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12941481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The price tag for Obama's remote control war keeps rising]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's more "collateral damage" from the U.S. drone war. Pakistani children under 5 years of age and American taxpayers far from the war zone are also paying a price for the Obama administration's secret aerial war.</p><p>As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/19/world/asia/taliban-block-vaccinations-in-pakistan.html">New York Times</a> reported yesterday</p><blockquote><p> A Pakistani Taliban commander has banned polio vaccinations in North Waziristan in the tribal belt, days before 161,000 children were due to be vaccinated. He linked the ban to U.S. drone strikes and fears that the CIA could use the polio campaign as cover for espionage.</p> <p>The announcement, made over the weekend, is a blow to polio vaccination efforts in Pakistan, one of just <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/18/world/asia/after-years-of-decline-polio-cases-in-afghanistan-rise.html">three countries where the disease is still endemic</a>, accounting for 198 new cases last year — the <a href="http://www.polioeradication.org/Dataandmonitoring/Poliothisweek.aspx">highest rate in the world</a>, followed by Afghanistan and Nigeria.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/drones_spur_debt_and_polio/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/drones_spur_debt_and_polio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s first neocon war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/birth_of_the_war_hawks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/birth_of_the_war_hawks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12940449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The War of 1812 gave us the first \"hawks\" in U.S. history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 200thanniversary of the War of 1812 Monday, NPR's "Morning Edition" noted that this obscure conflict resulted in the sacking of Washington in 1814, but also gave us the Star Spangled Banner. This reassuring balance of costs and benefits makes for a tidy historical footnote while managing to gloss over the few reasons why the War of 1812 still matters today.</p><p>It matters mostly as an occasion for patriotic pomp and circumstance in the mid-Atlantic states and Canada where the war was fought. Maryland has issued a commemorative license plate, complete with bombs bursting in air. Replicas of the tall ships of that era are sailing in Baltimore Harbor. But the war also has some historical relevance. In Foreign Policy, James Traub calls the War of 1812, the <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/06/15/war_of_1812">"most important war you know nothing about."</a></p><p>The War of 1812 matters because it was America's first war of choice. The United States did not have to declare war on Great Britain on June 18, 1812, to survive as a nation and indeed President James Madison did not want to. The newly founded United States was growing westward but the "war hawks" in Congress pressed for a conflict with America's former colonial masters in the hopes of gaining even more territory to the north. The term "hawk" was coined in the run-up to the War of 1812 and the hawks of U.S. foreign policy have been with us ever since.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/birth_of_the_war_hawks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/19/birth_of_the_war_hawks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio&#8217;s Dream Act is dead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/rubios_dream_act_is_dead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/rubios_dream_act_is_dead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12940787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And his vice-presidential hopes are on life support]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Marco Rubio tells the<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/06/18/rubio-says-own-dream-act-derailed-for-now/"> Wall Street Journal</a> that he is abandoning his effort to craft a more moderate Republican immigration policy. With<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/obama%E2%80%99s_immigration_trifecta/"> President Obama's announcement </a>that the administration will stop deportations of undocumented students who stay in school and obey the law, Rubio's policy agenda has been effectively preempted.</p><p>“People are going to say to me, ‘Why are we going to need to do anything on this now? It has been dealt with. We can wait until after the election," he said. "And it is going to be hard to argue against that.”</p><p>As Rubio's efforts to influence the party's position on immigration come to naught, so have his prospects for being Mitt Romney's running mate.  "His chances of staying on the vice presidential short list are shriveling fast," says <a href="http://corporate.cqrollcall.com/content/4/en/CQ_Roll_Call_Daily_Briefing">Roll Call</a>, "because there’s no percentage in Romney picking a lawmaker whose signature legislation is now officially anathema to the party."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/rubios_dream_act_is_dead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/18/rubios_dream_act_is_dead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama reframes immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/obama_reframes_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/obama_reframes_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12939639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with gay marriage, presidential action creates a new political reality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama's announcement that the Department of Homeland Security will stop deporting undocumented young people who were brought to the United State as children is not only a vindication of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/the_imperative_of_political_pressure/">activist pressure tactics</a>, as Glenn Greenwald says, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/obama%E2%80%99s_immigration_trifecta/">smart electoral politics</a>, as Steve Kornacki points out. It has already reframed the immigration debate in much the same way his shift to support marriage equality reframed the politics of gay marriage.</p><p>Obama's announcement marks "a shift in how immigration is talked about," said Gaby Pacheco, a Miami student and leader of the movement that persuaded Obama to abandon his previous insistence that he did not have the legal power to protect undocumented students. "We are no longer what people call a minority. Our community is part of this country and we cannot  continue to be ignored."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/obama_reframes_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/15/obama_reframes_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Archives: No new JFK docs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/national_archives_no_new_jfk_docs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/national_archives_no_new_jfk_docs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JFK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12938295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bowing to the CIA, the National Archives says it won't release 1,100 secret assassination documents in 2013]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Acquiescing to CIA demands for secrecy, the National Archives announced Wednesday that it will not release 1,171 top-secret Agency documents related to the assassination of President Kennedy in time for the 5oth anniversary of JFK's death in November 2013.</p><p><a href="http://whowhatwhy.com/2012/05/30/is-the-government-holding-back-crucial-documents/">"Is the government holding back crucial JFK documents,"</a> asked Russ Baker in a WhoWhatWhy piece that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/31/what_gets_declassified/singleton/">Salon</a> published last month. The answer, unfortunately, is yes. In <a href="http://www.aarclibrary.org/notices/AARC_-_NARA_Letter_2012-06-12.pdf">a letter released this week</a>, Gary Stern, general counsel for the National Archives and Record Administration, said the Archives would not release the records as part of the Obama administration's ongoing declassification campaign. Stern cited CIA claims that "substantial logistical requirements" prevented their disclosure next year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/national_archives_no_new_jfk_docs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/national_archives_no_new_jfk_docs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rand Paul takes on the Pentagon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/rand_paul_stop_the_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/rand_paul_stop_the_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12937676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kentucky senator wants to curb unmanned flights, but the Air Force tells Salon about its plans to expand them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the Pentagon leads the push to integrate military drones into domestic airspace by 2015, Senator Rand Paul, R-Ken., is promoting legislation to curb the use of drones in the United States.</p><p>At issue is the future of the U.S. military's unmanned aviation training programs in the United States and the privacy rights of Americans. The Air Force plans to bring an estimated 500 large drones from overseas war zones to the United States by 2015, while the Army plans to buy up to 120 new drones in coming years, according to Steve Pennington, director of bases, ranges and airspace for the U.S. Air Force. In an interview at his Pentagon office, Pennington said the military needs to fly these massive unmanned aircraft at home  to prepare U.S. troops for future combat missions overseas.</p><p>"We in the Air Force and DOD [Department of Defense] believe the vast majority of the unmanned aircraft can be integrated" into U.S. airspace," he said. "They can fly just like a Cessna or a 737."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/rand_paul_stop_the_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/14/rand_paul_stop_the_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hatred: What drones sow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/12/hatred_what_drones_sow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/12/hatred_what_drones_sow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12935300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hidden and growing danger of Obama's remote air war in Pakistan and Yemen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the New York Times had run a story late in the spring of 2008 revealing that the Bush administration, including Karl Rove, met weekly to mull a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=all">"kill list"</a> of suspected jihadists, one can be sure that congressional Democrats and liberals would be apoplectic. There might even be people marching in the streets. Now the antiwar left is quiescent.</p><p>Glenn Greenwald blames the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/08/media_drones_and_rank_propaganda/">authoritarian mind-set</a> of the Washington policy class, while Chris Hedges blames the death of <a href="http://global-peace-timnolan7.blogspot.com/2012/06/chris-hedges-death-of-liberal-class.html">the effective liberal class</a>, both of which are factors. But there's another less judgmental explanation. Liberal Americans, like conservatives, prefer instability (and randomized violence) overseas to a diminishing of their sense of security at home. Destabilization as security policy may be shortsighted but it is recognizably American.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/12/hatred_what_drones_sow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/12/hatred_what_drones_sow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.N. rights chief calls for drone probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/un_rights_chief_calls_for_drone_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/un_rights_chief_calls_for_drone_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leon Panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12934104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Civilian victims are due compensation, says top official; Panetta says strikes will continue
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.N.'s human rights commissioner called for an investigation of civilian casualties in U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan yesterday, as Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said the aerial attacks would continue.</p><p>“Drone attacks do raise serious questions about compliance with international law,” the U.N.'s Navi Pillay told a news conference in Islamabad, according to <a href="http://tribune.com.pk/story/390225/us-drone-attacks-in-pakistan-un-backs-probe-into-civilian-casualties/">AFP</a>. It was the U.N.'s strongest condemnation yet of President Obama's remote control war that has killed four top al-Qaida commanders in recents months and scores of bystanders.</p><p>Chris Woods of the London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism (TBIJ) reported this week that the CIA has resumed the practice of <a href="http://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/2012/06/04/cia-revives-attacks-on-rescuers-in-pakistan/">attacking rescuers</a> who come to the aid of victims of the strikes as well as funeral goers who mourn them. The attacks were front-page news in Pakistan during Pillay's four-day visit to the country.</p><p>“I see the indiscriminate killings and injuries of civilians, in any circumstances, as human rights violations," she said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/un_rights_chief_calls_for_drone_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/un_rights_chief_calls_for_drone_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phil Gramm: The success of failure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/phil_gramm_the_success_of_failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/phil_gramm_the_success_of_failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12933695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislative architect of the Great Recession lands a plum post at a conservative think tank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the annals of Washington failure, former Texas Sen. Phil Gramm looms large for the persistence and grandeur of his truly bad ideas. In the '80s and '90s, he succeeded in passing legislation that ranged from costly to ineffectual to destructive. As a banker in the aughts, his advice cost shareholders billions. As much as anyone, Gramm created the financial deregulation regime that culminated in the Great Recession of 2008. Which is why he was just named a <a href="http://www.aei.org/scholar/">visiting scholar</a> at the conservative American Enterprise Institute in Washington.</p><p>"Senator Gramm is one of the most innovative policymakers of our time," said AEI president Arthur Brooks in a press release. In much the same way, subprime mortgages were one of the most innovative financial instruments of our time.</p><p>Certainly, few can match Gramm's accomplishments. While still a congressman, he co-sponsored President Reagan's tax cuts in 1981, which launched the era of growing inequality that we live in, and increased government deficit spending to then-record highs. In Gramm's defense, AEI notes that he "authored the Gramm-Rudman Balanced Budget and Deficit Control Act, the first congressional effort to rein in the deficit."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/phil_gramm_the_success_of_failure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/07/phil_gramm_the_success_of_failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kobach&#8217;s radical agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/the_kobach_agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/the_kobach_agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12933221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kansas Sec. of State already has Romney's ear on immigration. Will the candidate follow him on other issues?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach has received the most attention for getting Romney to endorse his hard-line views on immigration, his philosophy of law is much broader. For Kobach, a graduate of Harvard and Yale Law School, immigration enforcement is just one part of a broader strategy that is creative and persistent in seeking to consolidate radical Republican power at every level of government. He is popular with the Republican rank and file.</p><p>There's no telling what role Kobach might have in a Romney administration. While Romney echoed his rhetoric on immigration, his campaign also made an effort to downplay his influence, telling Politico in April that he was a <a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/04/kobach-is-not-mitt-romneys-immigration-adviser-120792.html">"supporter,"</a> not an "advisor." Kobach countered by citing a campaign <a href="http://www.mittromney.com/news/press/2012/01/mitt-romney-announces-support-kansas-secretary-state-kris-kobach">press release</a> in which Romney said he was "part of the team." Kobach said he remained in <a href="http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/dr20120606-u-s-drones-take-out-al-qaeda-s-second-in-command">regular contact</a> with campaign officials, a claim that Romney aides did not dispute.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/the_kobach_agenda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/the_kobach_agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another right-wing drone skeptic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/01/another_right_wing_drone_skeptic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/01/another_right_wing_drone_skeptic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12930865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Goldsmith, a former Bush official, supports an ACLU lawsuit for more information on remote aerial warfare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it about drones that drives conservative figures into the arms of the American Civil Liberties Union?</p><p>First, it was Charles Krauthammer saying he was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/conservatives_turn_on_drones/">"going ACLU"</a> and calling for an outright ban on drones in the U.S. airspace. (The ACLU doesn't go that far, but never mind.)</p><p>Now, former Bush administration official Jack Goldsmith writes at <a href="http://www.lawfareblog.com/2012/05/drone-stories-the-secrecy-system-and-public-accountability/">Lawfare</a> that revelations about the Obama administration's drone war are making him sympathetic to an ACLU lawsuit that seeks to force disclosure of the legal basis for the aerial war against suspected militants in Pakistan and Yemen. Even Goldsmith, who defended much of the Bush administration's war on terror, says secrecy has gone too far under Obama.</p><p>The administration is resisting the ACLU by saying it will neither confirm nor deny the existence of the drone program, which is known in Freedom of Information Act law as a "Glomar Defense." With the story of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html?pagewanted=all">Obama's "kill list"</a> going from the New York Times around the world, that defense would seem to be getting weaker. But Goldsmith observes that:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/01/another_right_wing_drone_skeptic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/01/another_right_wing_drone_skeptic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dreamers get more lip service</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/31/dreamers_get_more_lip_service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/31/dreamers_get_more_lip_service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12930316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rubio ally offers a "1/4 DREAM Act" while Obama stalls]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Hispanic Republican from Florida boldly broke with his party's orthodoxy on illegal immigration yesterday, introducing a bill to help undocumented young people stay in school -- but it wasn't Sen. Marco Rubio.</p><p>While the Florida senator's much-touted but still vague plans to offer a GOP version of the DREAM Act have yet to materialize, Rubio's friend Rep. David Rivera of Miami <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77zaWyGgj3M&amp;list=UUXEYWIua5-pfVH0nMrK1oVQ&amp;index=1&amp;feature=plcphttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77zaWyGgj3M&amp;list=UUXEYWIua5-pfVH0nMrK1oVQ&amp;index=1&amp;feature=plcp">introduced</a> the Studying Towards Adjusted Residency Status (STARS) Act, which would allow undocumented high school graduates who arrived here at a young age and are accepted into a university to apply for conditional non-immigrant status that could put them on an eight-year path to citizenship.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/31/dreamers_get_more_lip_service/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/31/dreamers_get_more_lip_service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>States fight for drone biz</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/states_fight_for_drone_biz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/states_fight_for_drone_biz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12929298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six UAV test sites are up for grabs -- and state governments are eager to get their hands on them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a dozen state governments across the country are scrambling to get into the drone business with the expectation that unmanned aviation will create new jobs in the near future.</p><p>This summer, they will begin competing for approval from the Federal Aviation Administration to run one of six unmanned aviation test sites around the country. Mandated by Congress earlier this year, the <a href="http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/uas/site_selection_faq/">test sites</a> are intended to demonstrate that unmanned vehicles can be integrated safely and quickly into U.S. airspace.</p><p>The domestic drone market is still small. In 2012, the civil unmanned aviation vehicle (UAV) market will account for only 1.4 percent of the $7 billion-plus drone industry, according to a recent <a href="http://www.visiongain.com/Report/824/The-Unmanned-Aerial-Vehicles-(UAV)-Market-2012-2022-Technologies-for-ISR-Counter-Insurgency">industry survey</a>. This year 98.6 percent of all UAV spending will pay for military applications. But the burst of interest in funding the establishment of the UAV test sites indicates many businesses and elected officials expect that to change soon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/states_fight_for_drone_biz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/states_fight_for_drone_biz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The face of collateral damage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/the_face_of_collateral_damage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/the_face_of_collateral_damage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Photos of missile debris help trace the path of a CIA drone missile that killed a young girl]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Around midnight on May 21, 2010, a girl named Fatima was killed when a succession of U.S.-made Hellfire missiles, each of them five-feet long and traveling at close to 1,000 miles per hour, smashed a compound of houses in a mountain village of Mohammed Khel in North Waziristan along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. Wounded in the explosions, which killed a half dozen men, Fatima and two other children were taken to a nearby hospital, where they died a few hours later.</p><p>Behram Noor, a Pakistani journalist, went to the hospital and took a picture of Fatima shortly before her death. Then, he went back to the scene of the explosions looking for evidence that might show who was responsible for the attack. In the rubble, he found a mechanism from a U.S.-made Hellfire missile and gave it to Reprieve, a British organization opposed to capital punishment, which shared photographs of the material with Salon. Reprieve executive director Clive Stafford Smith alluded to the missile fragments in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/04/opinion/in-pakistan-drones-kill-our-innocent-allies.html?_r=1">an Op-Ed piece</a> for the New York Times last fall. They have also been <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/under-fire-from-afar-harrowing-exhibition-reveals-damage-done-by-drones-in-pakistan-2327832.html?action=gallery&amp;ino=6">displayed</a> in England.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/the_face_of_collateral_damage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/29/the_face_of_collateral_damage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Latinos elect Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/will_latinos_elect_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/will_latinos_elect_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hispanic voters may not be as decisive a voting bloc as everyone assumes. Just look at the swing states]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The conventional wisdom is that the growing Latino vote is key to President Obama's reelection prospects. By all accounts, Latinos favor the president over Mitt Romney by wider margins than they favored him over John McCain in 2008, when he won <a href="http://www.pewhispanic.org/2008/11/05/the-hispanic-vote-in-the-2008-election/">two-thirds of the Hispanic vote</a> and captured crucial swing states with large Hispanic populations, including Colorado, Nevada and Florida. Bloomberg reported this week that lower-than-average unemployment in the key battleground states "coupled with the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-23/obama-prospects-improve-as-swing-state-economies-improve.html">growth of adult minority populations</a> in those states create a higher bar" for Romney in his quest to oust the incumbent.</p><p>But a closer look at the numbers is not so reassuring for the president. Much of the growth in the Latino population has occurred in California, Texas, Illinois and New York, which are not likely to be competitive come Election Day. While the Latino population is growing fast, the Latino electorate is not. Compared to other ethnic/racial groups, Latinos are more likely than whites to be under 18 years of age or to be non-citizens. "For every 100 Hispanic residents in the United States, only 44 are eligible voters aged 18 and over and U.S. citizens," notes William Frey, demographer at the Brookings Institution. "In contrast, 78 of every 100 white residents are able to vote."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/will_latinos_elect_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/will_latinos_elect_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drones&#8217; new weapon: P.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/drones_new_weapon_p_r/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/drones_new_weapon_p_r/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The industry's fighting back, determined to remake its image. "Change scares people," an industry rep tells Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stung by mounting hostility from the left and right, America's drone industry is fighting back.</p><p>"We're going to do a much better job of educating people about unmanned aviation, the good and the bad," said Michael Toscano, president of the Association of Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, the industry's trade group in Washington. "We're working on drafting the right message and how to get it out there."</p><p>The P.R. blitz comes after drones suffered a round of negative attention last week. Conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer called for a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/conservatives_turn_on_drones/singleton/">ban on drones</a> in U.S. airspace, and two other conservative commentators endorsed the idea of <a href="http://townhall.com/columnists/judgeandrewnapolitano/2012/05/17/is_there_a_drone_in_your_backyard">shooting down</a> unmanned aircraft flown by U.S. law enforcement agencies. (Opposition to the U.S. government's deployment of unmanned vehicles had previously come from left-liberal groups concerned about <a href="http://www.dev8.salon.com/2012/04/30/drone_victims_defender_speaks/singleton/">civilian casualties</a> in the drone war in Pakistan and potential threats to civil liberties at home.) The nation also witnessed drone "scares": An unidentified flying object nearly <a href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jefferson_morley/" target="_blank">collided with a plane</a> over Denver, and <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2012/05/18/nato_summit_drone_video_is_probably_a_hoax_watch_.html" target="_blank">rumors circulated of a surveillance drone</a> flying near the NATO summit in Illinois.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/drones_new_weapon_p_r/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/drones_new_weapon_p_r/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A drone near-disaster?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/denvers_drone_near_disaster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/denvers_drone_near_disaster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An airplane pilot reports a near collision with a "remotely controlled aircraft" over Denver]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The near collision of a corporate jet and what was described as "a large remote controlled aircraft" in Colorado highlights the challenges facing aviation authorities as they seek to fulfill a congressional mandate to open U.S. airspace to drones.</p><p>As reported by <a href="http://www.9news.com/news/article/268207/188/Mystery-object-nearly-causes-mid-air-collision">a Denver TV station</a> this week, the pilot of a Cessna flying at 8,000 feet over Denver told air traffic controllers he had just seen an unidentified object pass by.</p><p>"A remote controlled aircraft, or what?" a nervous-sounding pilot said in conversation captured by <a href="http://www.liveatc.net/search/?icao=kden">LiveATC.net</a>, a website that monitors air traffic control traffic. "Something just went by the other way ... About 20 to 30 seconds ago. It was like a large remote-controlled aircraft."</p><p>The station's aviation analyst said the object could have been one of three things: "A military or law enforcement drone, a remote controlled aircraft, or a large bird."</p><p>An FAA spokesman in Washington said, "We reviewed radar and audio communications but found no unidentified targets in the area where the Citation pilot was flying, and no other pilot reported seeing an unidentified aircraft."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/denvers_drone_near_disaster/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/denvers_drone_near_disaster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s broken immigration promise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/obamas_broken_immigration_promise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/obamas_broken_immigration_promise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ICE said it would target dangerous immigrants, but it's actually deporting a higher percentage of non-criminals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration claims that it is deporting record numbers of illegal immigrants while focusing on those with criminal records. But new data from Immigration and Customs Enforcement shows that the number of deportation orders has declined dramatically since last summer and non-criminals comprise a growing percentage of those expelled from the country.</p><p>That wasn't supposed to happen under a policy of "prosecutorial discretion" announced by ICE director John Morton last June. The goal of the policy, announced with much fanfare in the Spanish language media, was to spare "longtime lawful residents" from deportation and to focus on criminals.</p><p>Since then, the adminstration has deported many fewer non-criminal aliens. But non-criminals remain the vast majority of those deported. And those with no criminal record now actually comprise a slightly larger percentage of those forced to leave the country than they did before Morton's announcement.</p><p>In the three months before the policy was announced last summer ICE filed for deportation proceedings against 61,192 people of whom 15 percent had criminal records. In the first three months of 2012, ICE sought 37,659 deportations orders, 14 percent of which involved people with criminal records.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/obamas_broken_immigration_promise/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/obamas_broken_immigration_promise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives turn on drones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/conservatives_turn_on_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/conservatives_turn_on_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing writers, from Charles Krauthammer to Matt Drudge, join the left in criticizing domestic drone use]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opposition to the use of drones in domestic airspace is spreading from the Code Pink left to the Fox News right. While conservatives laud the use of drones against suspected militants overseas, the sudden and vehement criticism of domestic drones this week by three right-wing commentators suggests that Congress's rush to open up U.S. airspace to unmanned aviation vehicles now faces an unusual left-right chorus of critics.</p><p>Admitting that he was "going ACLU," conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/14/krauthammer_on_drones_flying_in_us_stop_it_here_stop_it_now.html%20http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/14/krauthammer_on_drones_flying_in_us_stop_it_here_stop_it_now.html">called Monday</a> for a total ban on the use of drones in U.S. airspace. As reported by <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/05/14/krauthammer_on_drones_flying_in_us_stop_it_here_stop_it_now.html">RealClearPolitics</a>, Dr. K said:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/conservatives_turn_on_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/conservatives_turn_on_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
