<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jennifer Liberto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jennifer_liberto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rabid watchdog</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/03/mwo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/03/mwo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2002 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/06/03/mwo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While attacking what it sees as a vast, right-wing media conspiracy, an anonymous Web site has led to  a growing media mystery: Who is behind Media Whores Online?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNN's Aaron Brown discovered he was the target of an organized campaign against him one morning in early May, when his Blackberry started vibrating with the fury of hundreds of e-mails. "It was like magic fingers at a cheap motel," he says. </p><p> He had run afoul of the online media critics at <a target= "new" href= "http://www.mediawhoresonline.com/">Media Whores Online</a>, an anonymously run Web site whose writers and readers share a conviction that the mainstream media (aka "media whores") is dominated by a right-wing agenda, slavishly praising President Bush and viciously attacking all things related to Bill Clinton, Al Gore or Democrats in general. So MWO devotees, in turn, attack back. </p><p> The site's gimmick is to activate its readers, directing them to the latest offending "whore" to spam with e-mail arrows. And in its nearly three-year history, MWO's profile has steadily risen, meriting increasingly frequent television and newspaper citations. All by ruffling the feathers of those easily wounded egos in journalism. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/06/03/mwo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/06/03/mwo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archive of grief</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/23/fund/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/23/fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2002 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/04/23/fund</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Among the thousands of e-mails the Justice Department  received about its Sept. 11 compensation fund were moving personal stories -- which may now face the federal dustbin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the thousands of letters stockpiled in a small, sterile Washington office seek an answer to a fairly simple question: Will the federal government's Victim Compensation Fund cover them? Others come from angry citizens with their own bitter agendas, whether they think the fund is not paying enough ("Sometimes I think that if my daughter-in-law and granddaughters were to take advantage of what is being offered that it would be like compromising with the devil," wrote a woman whose son had worked for Cantor Fitzgerald in the World Trade Center) or that it shouldn't pay a dime ("The reality is that any one of these people could have been killed crossing the street that same day," wrote one). </p><p>The letters poured into the Department of Justice after the agency made a public announcement asking for responses to or suggestions about its plans to distribute the massive multibillion-dollar fund established last year by Congress to benefit the victims of the terrorist acts of Sept. 11 and their families. And among the pages is a seemingly endless amount of finger-pointing and recrimination. Some, following a campaign by Amnesty International, wrote to complain that domestic partners will not be covered by the fund, while one woman, identifying herself as the sister-in-law of a World Trade Center victim, was "outraged" at such a prospect and asked the fund to "show some respect for the American institution for legal marriage and for decent people with morals and strength of character." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/04/23/fund/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/04/23/fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

