<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Jillian Rayfield</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/jillian_rayfield/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:17:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Poll shows Bachmann trailing in 2014 reelection race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/poll_shows_bachmann_trailing_in_2014_reelection_race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/poll_shows_bachmann_trailing_in_2014_reelection_race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new PPP poll shows her Dem challenger with a slight lead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/poll-michele-bachmann-in-for-tight-fight-91604.html">new poll</a> by the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling, Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., is in for another tough reelection fight in the 2014 midterms.</p><p>The poll, which surveyed 500 voters in May, shows that Bachmann's Democratic challenger Jim Graves has a slight lead, at 47-45 percent -- within the poll's 4.4 percent margin of error.</p><p>Bachmann's 2012 presidential campaign is currently <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/fbi_reportedly_joins_bachmann_campaign_finance_probe/">under investigation</a> by the FBI, the Office of Congressional Ethics, the FEC and an Iowa state Senate ethics committee over alleged campaign finance violations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/poll_shows_bachmann_trailing_in_2014_reelection_race/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/poll_shows_bachmann_trailing_in_2014_reelection_race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House lawyer reportedly knew of IRS findings in April</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Weeks before an audit went public, the chief attorney knew about conservative targeting by the agency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House chief attorney Kathryn Ruemmler was reportedly informed about the IRS's targeting of conservative groups in April, weeks before an Inspector General audit on the matter went public.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/20/white-house-knew-of-irs-targeting-in-late-april-official-says/">Washington Post</a>, which cites "a senior White House official":</p><blockquote><p>The Treasury inspector general for tax administration told the White House counsel’s office that it “was completing a report finding that line IRS employees had improperly scrutinized certain 501(c)(4) organizations by using words like ‘tea party’ and ‘patriot,;” the senior White House official said. White House staff were also told the report had not been finalized, and that the publication date had not been set, but would likely come soon.</p></blockquote><p>And <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/20/us/politics/white-house-told-of-irs-scrutiny-of-groups-in-april.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">The New York Times</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/white_house_lawyer_reportedly_knew_of_irs_findings_in_april/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell: Obamacare will dominate 2014 midterms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I think it’s coming back big-time," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., predicted that Obamacare would dominate the 2014 midterm elections.</p><p>“I don’t know what the issues will be next year. If I were predicting what’s likely to be the biggest issue in the 2014 election, I think it would be Obamacare,” he said on Meet The Press, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/19/mcconnell-predicts-obamacare-will-be-biggest-issue-of-2014-election/?wprss=rss_election-2012">Washington Post</a> reports. “I think it’s coming back big-time.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Obama to make big speech about drones, Guantanamo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[al qaeda]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The President will reportedly address White House counterterrorism policy on Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, President Obama will reportedly make a big speech to address White House counterterrorism policy, including the closing of Guantanamo Bay and the Administration's use of drone strikes.</p><p>According to an administration official, Politico reports, Obama will discuss the policy at the National Defense University in Washington. From <a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/obama-to-speak-on-guantanamo-counterterror-drones-164301.html">Politico</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Obama plans elaborate on "the state of the threats we face, particularly as Al Qaeda core has weakened but new dangers have emerged," the official said. He will also "discuss the policy and legal framework under which we take action against terrorist threats, including the use of drones" and "will review our detention policy and efforts to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay."</p> <p>The president will also "frame the future of our efforts against Al Qaeda, its affiliates and adherents."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/report_obama_to_make_big_speech_about_drones_guantanamo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Obama approval at 53 percent amid IRS, Benghazi controversies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 18:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The same poll showed Obama's approval at 51 percent in early April]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new CNN/ORC poll finds that despite the controversies surrounding the IRS and the attacks in Benghazi, President Obama still enjoys a 53 percent approval rating, up from 51 percent at the beginning of April.</p><p>45 percent now say they disapprove of the President.</p><p>From <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/19/have-new-controversies-hurt-obama-has-gop-overreacted/">CNN</a>:</p><blockquote><p>"That two-point difference is well within the poll's sampling error, so it is a mistake to characterize it as a gain for the president," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. "Nonetheless, an approval rating that has not dropped and remains over 50% will probably be taken as good news by Democrats after the events of the last week."</p> <p>The CNN poll is in-line with Gallup, which also indicated a very slight rise in Obama's approval rating over the same time period. And Gallup's daily tracking poll also indicated a slight upward movement of Obama's approval rating over the past week. But as with the CNN poll, it was within that survey's sampling error.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/poll_obama_approval_at_53_percent_amid_irs_benghazi_controversies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday shows round-up: All about the IRS and Benghazi</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/sunday_shows_round_up_all_about_the_irs_and_benghazi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/sunday_shows_round_up_all_about_the_irs_and_benghazi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Pfeiffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunday shows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week's Sunday shows were unsurprisingly dominated by the IRS and Benghazi controversies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week's Sunday shows focused on the latest revelations in the Benghazi and IRS controversies. Here are the highlights:</p><p>On the IRS scandal:</p><p>Dan Pfeiffer, a senior adviser to President Obama, addressed the IRS scandal, saying that the law is "irrelevant" though the actions of the IRS were "outrageous and inexcusable."</p><p>“I can’t speak to the law here. The law is irrelevant,” he said on ABC's This Week. “The activity was outrageous and inexcusable, and it was stopped and it needs to be fixed to ensure it never happens again.”</p><p>When pressed by host George Stephanopoulos, Pfeiffer explained: “What I mean is, whether it’s legal or illegal is not important to the fact that the conduct doesn’t matter. The Department of Justice has said that they’re looking into the legality of this. The president is not going to wait for that. We have to make sure it does not happen again, regardless of how that turns out.”</p><p>Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on the other hand, said that he cannot believe that the misconduct by IRS employees was so limited in scope. “I can’t believe that one agent sort of started this,” he said on CNN’s State of the Union. “It seems too widespread.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/sunday_shows_round_up_all_about_the_irs_and_benghazi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/sunday_shows_round_up_all_about_the_irs_and_benghazi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Ryan: &#8220;I don&#8217;t know&#8221; if there was a Benghazi cover-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We just need to investigate this for the sake of good government," he added]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., said on this week's episode of Fox News Sunday that he does not know whether there was a "cover-up" related to the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, but the investigation needs to run its course.</p><p>"Those of us who have had the briefings, seen the videos, know there was no protest involved," Ryan said. "To suggest afterwards that this was the result of a spontaneous protest, we now know is not the case. So the burden of proof here is on the administration's side. Why did they continue to push this kind of a story when they knew nearly immediately afterwards that that was not the case?"</p><p>Host Chris Wallace asked Ryan if he thinks the White House "purposely misled" the American people to help win the election. "I don't know the answer to that question," Ryan replied. "Rather make a conclusion before an investigation has been completed, we just need to investigate this for the sake of good government."</p><p>As <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/19/paul-ryan-benghazi_n_3302582.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">The Huffington Post</a> points out, this is a slightly different approach from the one Ryan has been taking:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/paul_ryan_i_dont_know_if_there_was_a_benghazi_cover_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI reportedly joins Bachmann campaign finance probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/fbi_reportedly_joins_bachmann_campaign_finance_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/fbi_reportedly_joins_bachmann_campaign_finance_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics Investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The agency is investigating alleged violations by Bachmann's 2012 presidential campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FBI is reportedly looking into allegations that Michele Bachmann's 2012 presidential campaign committed campaign finance violations, adding to the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/this_could_be_a_career_ender_for_michele_bachmann/">multiple ongoing probes</a> of her campaign and raising the possibility that there were criminal violations involved.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.minnpost.com/political-agenda/2013/05/fbi-joins-probe-bachmanns-presidential-campaign">Minnesota Post</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The FBI joins the Office of Congressional Ethics, the Federal Elections Commission and an Iowa state Senate ethics committee in probing whether Bachmann's presidential campaign paid an Iowa state senator from her MichelePAC, a fund that should not have been used for campaign expenses, and whether the state senator stole the email list of an Iowa home-school group from another Bachmann staffer, Barbara Hekki, prior to the Iowa caucuses in January, 2012.</p> <p>Andy Parrish, former Bachmann chief of staff and one of the directors of Bachmann's Iowa GOP presidential campaign, will be interviewed by the FBI, according to his attorney, John Gilmore.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/fbi_reportedly_joins_bachmann_campaign_finance_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/fbi_reportedly_joins_bachmann_campaign_finance_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal: IRS officials should &#8220;go to jail&#8221; for targeting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You cannot take the freedom of law-abiding Americans...and keep your own freedom"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican, reportedly argued that the IRS officials responsible for targeting tea party and other conservative groups deserve jail time.</p><p>“Anyone who participated in this targeting of Americans for their political beliefs, anyone who knew about it, anyone who simply looked the other way, and anyone under whose watch this occurred needs to be fired,” <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/18/jindal-irs-offenses-worthy-of-jail-time/">CNN</a> reports Jindal planned to say in a speech before Virginia Republicans on Saturday, according to his prepared remarks.</p><p>“But in this instance, it is the IRS, people in a position of public trust, who have violated the Constitution of the United States of America. You cannot take the freedom of law-abiding Americans, whether you disagree with them or not, and keep your own freedom. When you do that, you go to jail,” he continued.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dem Congressman slams GOP for &#8220;doctored&#8221; Benghazi emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressman_slams_gop_for_doctored_benghazi_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressman_slams_gop_for_doctored_benghazi_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Schiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Adam Schiff also called for answers as to who allegedly leaked and altered the emails]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff is calling for answers into how emails about the attacks on Benghazi were leaked and altered, reportedly by Republican aides, which Schiff says was "intended to further a politically-driven narrative."</p><p>CBS News reported last week that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/">emails</a> between the CIA, White House and State Department, leaked to ABC News and purportedly showing the State Department's key role in drafting talking points about the attacks, were sent out by Republicans, and had key differences from the originals released by the White House.</p><p>Schiff, a Congressman from California who sits on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement on Saturday that the House Oversight Committee, and Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the committee, should provide answers for how the emails leaked in the first place, saying that Congress's oversight authority "certainly does not justify the leak of falsified information intended to further a politically-driven narrative."</p><p>From the statement:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressman_slams_gop_for_doctored_benghazi_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressman_slams_gop_for_doctored_benghazi_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: Amy Poehler returns to SNL</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Meyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekend update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Weekend Update, she and Seth Meyers had just one reaction to the IRS scandal: "Really!?!"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Poehler returned to "Saturday Night Live" this weekend to help Seth Meyers cover the IRS scandal on Weekend Update, for "Really!?! With Seth and Amy."</p><p>"IRS: No one needs to avoid scandals more than you. You're less popular with Americans than exercise," Meyers said.</p><p>"I mean really, the government only keeps you around to make the DMV look good," Poehler added.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=n37073" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/must_see_morning_clip_amy_poehler_returns_to_snl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growing, lurking threat: &#8220;Paper terrorism&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/why_you_should_fear_paper_terrorism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/why_you_should_fear_paper_terrorism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereign Citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schaeffer Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Fulton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Pence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-government militia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Turner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massive financial schemes by anti-government zealots and sovereign citizens have states scrambling for protection]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you stop one anti-government extremist from <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/sovereign_citizen_gets_five_years_for_trillion-dol.php" target="_blank">coordinating</a> a trillion dollar “paper terrorism” scheme involving a raft of false financial documents, or deal with another who <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/02/sovereign_citizen_sues_prosecutors_for_grammar-bas.php" target="_blank">sues</a> prosecutors for allegedly conspiring against him by using poor grammar?</p><p>This is the question that state governments and federal agencies are faced with, ever since a surge of people who consider themselves "sovereign citizens" began acting on their belief that all aspects of law and government are illegitimate. The <a href="http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/ideology/sovereign-citizens-movement#.UZZGhStAQYQ" target="_blank">Southern Poverty Law Center</a> estimates that in 2011 there were approximately 100,000 "hard-core" believers in sovereign citizen ideology, though it's a tough number to nail down because the movement is so disparate. For the same reason -- and because, by their nature, members of the movement don't believe in laws -- it's also tough to draft legislation to specifically target those crimes favored by sovereign citizens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/why_you_should_fear_paper_terrorism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/why_you_should_fear_paper_terrorism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chair: Don&#8217;t call for impeachment without evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reince Priebus chided members of the Republican party who have called for Obama's impeachment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC Chair Reince Priebus warned members of the Republican party to be cautious when calling for President Obama's impeachment over the Benghazi and IRS scandals, "until you have evidence."</p><p>“We have to be persistent but patient,” Priebus told <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/behind-the-curtain-why-the-gop-thinks-it-could-blow-it-91528.html?hp=t1">Politico</a>. “I think where there’s smoke, there’s fire. If we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not transparent, is obsessed with power and hates dissent. But you don’t call for impeachment until you have evidence.”</p><p>Republicans like Sen. Jim Inhofe, Okla., and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah, have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/">argued</a> that the President could be impeached over the State Department's handling of the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya — not to mention the slew of Republicans who have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/">invoked</a> Watergate when discussing the IRS scandal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allen West lands a gig at Fox News</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/allen_west_lands_a_gig_at_fox_news/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/allen_west_lands_a_gig_at_fox_news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Florida congressman will join the network as a contributor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Rep. Allen West, a Republican from Florida who was ousted in his 2012 reelection campaign, has landed a gig at Fox News as a contributor.</p><p>In a statement obtained by the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/16/allen-west-hired-as-fox-news-contributor/">Washington Post</a>, Fox News Vice President Bill Shine said that “Representative West’s congressional and military experience along with his fearless approach to voicing key issues will provide a valuable point of view to the FOX News lineup."</p><p>Since losing his race, West has been hosting an online show on Pajamas Media on which he's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/allen_west_gets_grossed_out_by_male_underwear_models/">described</a> NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg as a “gnome,” called MSNBC host Touré a “coward,” and mocked Fox News’ own Brit Hume for wearing a salmon-colored shirt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/allen_west_lands_a_gig_at_fox_news/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/allen_west_lands_a_gig_at_fox_news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Mostly Republicans are following IRS, Benghazi scandals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a slight majority of Americans overall say they're following the scandals closely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162584/americans-attention-irs-benghazi-stories-below-average.aspx">Gallup</a> poll, only slight majority of Americans say they're engaged in the IRS and Benghazi scandals - with 54 percent saying they're closely following the IRS scandal, and 53 percent saying the same of Benghazi - and there is a big split between how closely Republicans and Democrats are following the stories.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Republicans are much more likely to say they are following these news stories closely than are independents or in particular Democrats. There is a 21-percentage-point gap between Republicans and Democrats in terms of following the Benghazi story closely, and a 27-point gap on the IRS story.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bipartisan House group comes to tentative immigration agreement</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/bipartisan_house_group_comes_to_tentative_immigration_agreement/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/bipartisan_house_group_comes_to_tentative_immigration_agreement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Diaz-Balart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Yarmuth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deal reportedly includes a pathway to citizenship]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bipartisan group of Representatives reached a tentative deal on immigration reform, a proposal that's expected to be introduced as legislation in June.</p><p>Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla., told reporters that the House version will differ “in a lot of areas” from that of the Senate, but the agreement is an important first step in a “a very difficult process.”</p><p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-16/bipartisan-house-group-reaches-tentative-immigration-deal.html">Bloomberg News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The House proposal, like the Senate’s, offers a path to citizenship for many of 11 million undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S., according to a House aide not authorized to discuss the deal publicly. While none would be barred from seeking that path, they would have to wait 10 years to become legal residents, making them eligible for citizenship after another five years. The bipartisan proposal in the Senate envisions a path to citizenship taking at least 13 years.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/bipartisan_house_group_comes_to_tentative_immigration_agreement/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/bipartisan_house_group_comes_to_tentative_immigration_agreement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: GOP mischaracterized Benghazi emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS News reports that the initially leaked emails have different quotes from the White House emails]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS News is reporting that leaked versions of the Benghazi emails sent out by Republicans had key differences from those released by the White House earlier this week.</p><p>The version of the emails initially sent out last Friday purported to show that the State Department and the White House gave input into the talking points issued by the CIA following the attacks on the U.S. consulate. But on Wednesday the White House released 100 pages of emails that contradict this conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57584947/wh-benghazi-emails-have-different-quotes-than-earlier-reported/">CBS News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>On Friday, Republicans leaked what they said was a quote from Rhodes: "We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don't want to undermine the FBI investigation."</p> <p>But it turns out that in the actual email, Rhodes did not mention the State Department.</p> <p>It read: "We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House trolls Republicans over Obamacare hashtag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP's #ObamaCareinThreeWords campaign takes a turn for the hilarious following ominous @whitehouse response ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans are preparing for a full floor vote on a repeal of the Affordable Care Act on Thursday. In the meantime, they have started a Twitter campaign in the form of the hashtag #ObamaCareinThreeWords, to get opponents of the law excited about the vote.</p><p>It began with tweets by Republicans:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335116680499974144"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335097469962682368"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335115056721317888"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335118484482695168"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335121258423386112"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335120630779359232"]</p><p>But then the White House started trolling them:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335104215863132160"]</p><p>The hashtag, which began trending, also inspired some political pundits to get in on the joke:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335118202113761280"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335107475634278401"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335099983093178368"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="335098244176674816"]</p><p>But even ultra-conservative Republican Rep. Steve Stockman knew where to draw the line:</p><p>[embedtweet id="335120430815932416"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/white_house_trolls_republicans_over_obamacare_hashtag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota GOPer: Climate change is a &#8220;United Nations fraud&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Gruenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He added that those who believe in man-made global warming "believe that exhaling causes global warming"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen, R-Minn., doesn't want the rest of the state legislature to worry about the prospect of man-made climate change, because "it's just a complete United Nations fraud and lie, OK?"</p><p>Gruenhagen was speaking on the House floor, and cited "facts from CPAC" showing that "in the last 16 years, there's been no global warming." He continued: "So members, I'd recommend that you keep breathing, OK? Because, you know, man-made global warming believes that exhaling causes global warming. I mean, the more you study it the more utter nonsense you see it is."</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2013/05/mngop_rep_gruenhagen_on_climate_change_its_just_a_complete_united_nations_fraud_video.php">Minnesota City Pages</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gDkGfO0BopE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pat Robertson: Husbands won&#8217;t cheat if the wife makes the home &#8220;wonderful&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Robertson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[700 club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["What you want to do is make a home so wonderful that he doesn’t want to wander," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Robertson argued on a recent episode of "The 700 Club" that if a man cheats on his wife, she should focus on making the home as "wonderful" as possible so that he doesn't "want to wander."</p><p>Robertson began by saying the wife should focus on the good about her cheating husband: "Does he provide a home for you to live in? Does he provide food for you to eat? Does he provide clothes for you to wear? Is he nice to the children? ... Is he handsome?"</p><p>"Give him honor instead of trying to worry about it," he continued. "But recognize also, like it or not, males have a tendency to wander a little bit and what you want to do is make a home so wonderful that he doesn’t want to wander.”</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/robertson-tells-woman-whose-husband-cheated-remember-hes-man-and-be-grateful-she-lives-ameri">Right Wing Watch</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/k_n-q_0qej4" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/pat_robertson_husbands_wont_cheat_if_the_wife_makes_the_home_wonderful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
