<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Joan Walsh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/joan_walsh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:27:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The wingnut trifecta</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Bolton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wingnut trifecta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crazy GOP claims that Hillary Clinton is faking her illness slur the country's three most popular Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right-wing claims that Hillary Clinton faked illness to avoid testifying about the Benghazi tragedy would be funny if they weren't so ugly. It's the wingnut trifecta, smearing our most popular past Democratic president, Bill Clinton, along with our current president, Barack Obama, and the current 2016 front-runner, all with one shot. Imagine birtherism crossed with the worst of the hateful anti-Clinton lies, like the "Vince Foster was murdered" claim. That's Hillary-health trutherism.</p><p>But so far <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/people-who-thought-hillary-clinton-was-faking-her?_tmc=Y4z-nYSU_ZjjWvFQxx8Pbsk_Lw8Lxb5qdlRCW6DG7Q0">right-wingers claiming that Clinton somehow faked her concussion</a> have gone virtually unchallenged on Fox News and right-wing sites like Newsbusters and the Daily Caller. Everyone from Charles Krauthammer to Sean Hannity to Laura Ingraham and former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton have gotten into the act. Even after reports that Clinton also suffered a dangerous blood clot between her brain and skull, Bolton not only failed to apologize, he suggested that she was dodging Benghazi questions in order to protect her 2016 chances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_wingnut_trifecta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest fiscal cliff lessons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pelosi still speaker. Obama still open to cutting Medicare, Social Security. U.S. still run by and for the wealthy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite boasting on both sides that Congress finally made a deal on the so-called fiscal cliff, people looking for details about the deal's ultimate outcome are going to have to wait until March. (A lot of important people had vacations ruined, so they have a stake in pretending something big got accomplished.)</p><p>There's no way to know how bad or good a deal Democrats cut until the conflict they postponed is resolved, and we know what it takes to lift the debt ceiling, keep the government running and deal with the "sequester" – the combination of automatic spending cuts to defense and to social programs baked into the original debt ceiling deal back in August 2011.</p><p>As someone who believed, and still believes, that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/the_case_against_cooperation/">it was best for the country if Democrats stood up to Republican hostage takers and went over the cliff</a>, I have to admit President Obama and his chief negotiator Vice President Joe Biden got some good things with this deal. Unemployment benefits were extended for 2 million Americans and so were tax credits that help the working and middle class. The deal also kept student-loan interest rates low. Lots of Democrats are also celebrating the fact that Republicans voted for their first tax-rate increase in 20 years. But since the White House got far less in revenue than it originally asked for, we'll see how great a concession that turned out to be, since the deal kept tax rates low for millions of wealthy Americans, and ceded crucial hikes on estates and investment income for the super-rich.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/biggest_fiscal_cliff_lessons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Armey apologizes to me</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/dick_armey_apologizes_to_me/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/dick_armey_apologizes_to_me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedomworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Facebook. Really. Where he also called my anti-FreedomWorks comments a "cheap shot." Read our exchange]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Facebook. Even founder Mark Zuckerberg's sister Randi learned the hard way that we don't always know who has access to our photos and profiles. I was as befuddled as Zuckerberg on Christmas when late Thursday afternoon, someone purporting to be Dick Armey sent me a private message that seemed to be an odd apology for saying he was "so damn glad" he couldn't be married to me, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/dick_armey/">on "Hardball" almost four years ago</a>. (We're not even Facebook "friends!")</p><p>Here's how it began:</p><blockquote><p>What I said to you on Chris Matthews' show was the meanest and very likely the dumbest thing I ever said on TV. I was wrong to have said it and I deserve all the bunk I get for it.</p></blockquote><p>But then he complained about <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/salons_joan_walsh_describes_right_wing_honcho_dick_armey_in_plain_english/">the previous day's "Hardball" segment</a>, in which I attacked <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_conservapocalypse_continues/">his attempted takeover of FreedomWorks</a>, backed by an aide with a gun.</p><blockquote><p>Certainly you know that spin about guns at FW was BS. I'm sorry you reduced yourself to expanding on it. Hit me with your best shot not your cheap shot. Dick Armey</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/dick_armey_apologizes_to_me/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/dick_armey_apologizes_to_me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hang tough, Mr. President</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/hang_tough_mr_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/hang_tough_mr_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 23:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boehner calls the House back on Sunday while McConnell rants and raves, but Obama still holds all the cards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't even have a vacation interrupted this week, and yet I'm still personally affronted by the spectacle of Washington pretending it's going to act on the so-called fiscal cliff. Anyone forced back to work by this mess has to be really resentful.</p><p>I hope that includes the president.</p><p>On a day marked by rumors of action that mainly turned out to be false – thanks in part to a Facebook post by soon-to-be-former Sen. Scott Brown – it was easy to believe the phony blame game that apportions equal responsibility to both sides, even though it's perfectly clear that Democrats have compromised to a fault, while the GOP won't. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid misdiagnosed the problem when he said House Speaker John Boehner was running a "dictatorship" – if he was a dictator, he could have at least passed Plan B. Reid's playing Dueling Floor Rants with the impotent Mitch McConnell could make anyone say "a pox on both their houses."</p><p>Of course, Reid was right on one point: The simplest way to resolve at least the looming tax hike problem is for the House to pass the Senate bill that extends the Bush tax cuts for everyone but the top 2 percent of taxpayers. I'm not sure I trust Reid or House Democrats who claim it would get enough Republican votes, plus all the Democrats, to pass the House – never underestimate the power of Tea Party dead-enders in the caucus -- but it would be an interesting test, for all sides.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/hang_tough_mr_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/hang_tough_mr_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives&#8217; full-on meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_conservapocalypse_continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_conservapocalypse_continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedomworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national rifle association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dana Loesch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservapocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of Wayne LaPierre's looney press conference, Dick Armey is exposed as a gun-empowered extortionist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_rights_stunning_meltdown/">The ugly, funny-if-it-wasn't-scary truth about our right wing overlords</a> keeps emerging as 2012 comes to a close. Last week we learned that House Speaker John Boehner is a pathetic hostage to the Tea Party crazies in his caucus, while the National Rifle Association's Wayne LaPierre shared his delusions at a post-Newtown press conference where he memorably intoned: "The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun" – ignoring the fact that gun "enthusiast" Nancy Lanza was murdered by her own guns, which then slaughtered 20 first-graders and six educator-heroes, plus her disturbed and ultimately suicidal son Adam.</p><p>Then over the weekend we discovered that the late Andrew Breitbart's empire of hate is imploding, and <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/talk-radio-host-dana-loesch-files-suit-in-st-louis/article_d2839490-2ed1-5de8-8292-0a3f90204a6d.html?utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_source=twitterfeed">the ridiculous Dana Loesch is trying to use the lifeboat of labor law to flee the ship of bullies</a> she once helmed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_conservapocalypse_continues/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/the_conservapocalypse_continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right&#8217;s stunning meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_rights_stunning_meltdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_rights_stunning_meltdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national rifle association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the NRA and the Tea Party exposed as destructive crackpots, can the rest of us finally undo their damage?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just when it seemed the meltdown on the right couldn't get any more spectacular, after House Speaker John Boehner's Plan B humiliation Thursday night, the NRA's Wayne LaPierre self-destructed Friday morning. His bizarre self-serving tirade blamed everything but guns for the Sandy Hook massacre last week. He proposed placing an armed police officer in every school.</p><p>"The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," he pronounced fatuously.</p><p>As usual for the NRA, the solution to gun violence is more guns. But finally, Americans are seeing that for the destructive illogic that it is. LaPierre is truly one of the bad guys. We don't need guns to fight him, though, we just need votes. And we need the politicians elected with our votes to stand up for us.</p><p>Last June, President Obama told a roomful of donors that if he were to be reelected, "the fever may break" and the Republican Party might return to its common-sense roots. It won't be that easy. Obama and the Democrats can't passively wait for relief from the sickness that claimed the GOP, even though it may seem that the party is self-destructing on its own. They are going to have to fight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_rights_stunning_meltdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/the_rights_stunning_meltdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiscal cliff factions: Brown v. Gray?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pitting "the next America" vs. white seniors is divisive and dangerous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Brownstein's latest National Journal story describes a hidden and fascinating fault line in the "fiscal cliff" debate: not between Democrats and Republicans but "<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/behind-the-fiscal-cliff-is-a-demographic-struggle-20121220?page=1">between the Brown and the Gray</a>." Brownstein is one of the best mainstream reporters covering the politics of American demographic change, and he lays out a tough truth: The lion's share of public resources today are going to seniors, 80 percent of whom are white, while a shrinking proportion goes to young people, a majority of whom are now black, Latino and Asian. Thus the way we solve the fiscal cliff crisis – by depicting it as a crisis, Brownstein displays a bias toward an establishment narrative that favors Republicans, but otherwise, the piece is fairly neutral – has racial as well as political and generational implications.</p><p>Brownstein is identifying a fault line, not creating it, let alone endorsing it. He raises points that are well worth discussing. But I wince at such a catchy depiction of polarization – even though Brownstein is right about the way particularly wealthy white seniors have gobbled up resources for themselves while denying them to others.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Compromise or betrayal?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/compromise_or_betrayal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/compromise_or_betrayal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Democrats cut Social Security, they're breaking a campaign promise and fostering cynicism about politics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://poy.time.com/2012/12/19/person-of-the-year-barack-obama/#ixzz2FVrM759u">Time magazine named President Obama its 2012 "Person of the Year,"</a> and it makes sense. Just two years ago he came out of the 2010 shellacking battered, his chance at a second term diminished. Instead he put together an astonishing coalition of America's future, and became the first president in 75 years to win more than 50 percent of the vote twice. Aware of historic second-term overreach, most notably when George W. Bush tried to privatize Social Security, Obama says he nonetheless has an ambitious agenda for the next four years.</p><p>It would be sad if he launched it by doing what Bush never did: cutting Social Security benefits for seniors by agreeing to a change in cost of living calculations called the chained CPI.</p><p>Once a topic for only the wonkiest of wonks, now the intricacies of the chained CPI are being debated by the hackiest of hacks. The bottom line is this: The longer you live, the less your benefits would grow. We still don't know how it would work; anonymous White House sources have promised any deal would include protections for the poorest seniors, the disabled and veterans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/compromise_or_betrayal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/compromise_or_betrayal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imagining Nancy Lanza</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/imagining_nancy_lanza/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/imagining_nancy_lanza/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is she a victim, or do her guns make her an accomplice? In the end, her attempts to cope with fear unraveled her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a tragedy like Sandy Hook, grief comes at us from all directions. First it was the children. First graders make us smile and feel uncomplicated joy at being alive. As parents, we can feel the stabbing pain of newly bereaved Newtown mothers and fathers, but we don't have to be parents to feel that loss.</p><p>Then Victoria Soto's memorial overwhelmed me. Two of my daughter's best friends are elementary school teachers; I felt their bravery and vulnerability in a whole new way. On Monday a CNN interview with principal Dawn Hochsprung's teary, 20-something daughter Erica, begging her mother to "come back, just come back" undid me, making me miss my own mother and think about my daughter someday missing me. All of us have multiple identities that let pain find us in many different ways.</p><p>The only person I haven't been able to think about is Nancy Lanza, the first victim, shot in her bed with her own gun by her own son, the terminally mentally ill Adam. I shrink from the story despite the fact -- or because of it -- that we had things in common. She was close to my age, divorced, with children in their 20s. But I've been blessed; my daughter is as much a joy today as she was as a first grader.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/imagining_nancy_lanza/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/imagining_nancy_lanza/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>194</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now&#8217;s the time to talk guns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/sorry_jay_carney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/sorry_jay_carney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, Jay Carney. With at least 18 school children dead, today is absolutely the day to have this conversation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House Press Secretary Jay Carney may wish he could take back these words. But pressed at a press conference to talk about whether the Sandy Hook school shooting tragedy would motivate President Obama to push to renew the assault weapons ban, Carney replied:</p><blockquote><p>It does remain a commitment of his. What I said is, today is not the day, I believe as a father, a day to engage in the usual Washington policy debates. I think that that they will come, but today is not that day, especially as we are awaiting more information about the situation in Connecticut.</p></blockquote><p>I beg to differ. Today is precisely the day. It's true, we still don't know details about the weapons the school shooter, or shooters, used in Connecticut. But we know that there are too many guns, and that the gun lobby fights all efforts to regulate them. The grief and outrage sparked by the Newtown tragedy ought to strengthen the arguments of those who fight for sane restrictions, as well as broader mental health services.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/sorry_jay_carney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/sorry_jay_carney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>204</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the GOP playing Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/luke_russert_tells_a_sad_truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/luke_russert_tells_a_sad_truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luke Russert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luke Russert reveals the sad truth why Republicans won't propose unpopular entitlement cuts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's no real mystery about why House Speaker John Boehner and his allies keep screaming about wanting spending cuts, but never propose any: The kinds of cuts they are known to want, like raising the eligibility age and/or means-testing Social Security and Medicare, are wildly unpopular. So on Thursday Boehner held a ranting press conference where he railed about "spending" but didn't propose one single cut.</p><p>On MSNBC's "Now With Alex" (guest-hosted by the great Joy-Ann Reid), congressional correspondent Luke Russert told the unvarnished truth about why the party that's for cuts won't lay any out. Reid asked Russert: "Do Republicans really feel that putting forward entitlement cuts will make them more popular with the American people?"</p><p>And Russert, who has good GOP sources, explained their logic:</p><blockquote><p>If they have entitlement cuts as part of this deal, they would make it, through their marketing ways, and they're better communications operatives than Democrats, that the president would own the entitlement cuts. They're not worried about that. They would say "the president owns that" in 2014 and 2016.</p> <p>Look at how they did that with the defense cuts as part of the sequester.  Remember those ads that Romney ran, that Republicans ran: "These are the president's defense cuts"? They'd do the same thing: "These are the president's entitlement cuts." They don't worry about that at all.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/luke_russert_tells_a_sad_truth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/luke_russert_tells_a_sad_truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real top lie of 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney was awarded Politifact's Lie of the Year -- and it wasn't even for his biggest whopper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Mitt Romney! You lost the presidential race, but you won another big contest: <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/dec/12/lie-year-2012-Romney-Jeeps-China/">You're Politifact's Liar of the Year</a>, for your brazen claim that thanks to the Obama auto restructuring, Chrysler was "going to build Jeeps in China," costing Americans jobs.</p><p>In fact, of the top 10 worst political lies Politifact nominated, four came straight from Romney. In addition to the Jeep lie, he was dinged for claiming Obama began his presidency "with an apology tour," that the president gutted the work requirement for welfare, and that he told business owners "you didn't build that" when in context he said they didn't build businesses alone.  Only two of the top lies came directly from Obama (exaggerating George Bush's responsibility for the deficit and claiming Romney called Arizona's draconian immigration laws a model for the nation). The rest came from campaign surrogates or television ads.  In what feels like standard Politifact false equivalence, Democrats and Republicans were responsible for five lies apiece.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/the_real_top_lie_of_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man up, Democrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's backwards language, but silly Lindsey Graham has a point: Dems must stop worrying and love the "fiscal cliff"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What's the connection between the November election, the "fiscal cliff" stalemate and Michigan's new anti-labor right-to-work legislation?</p><p>Well, obviously Democrats won the election, holding the White House, increasing their lead in the Senate and picking up seats in the House. But while some Republicans promised to commence soul-searching about why most Americans rejected their message, their right-wing flank, and the plutocrats who fund them, are only getting crazier. That leaves victorious Democrats looking for ways to placate them, instead of looking for ways to exercise their mandate. This seems wrong.</p><p>I mean, how do you explain the phenomenon of President Obama winning Michigan by 10 points, and the state GOP's very next political move is passing unpopular right-to-work legislation in a lame duck session, before they concede seats to Democrats (and some less crazy Republicans) in January? That flies in the face of the way the political system is supposed to work. The electorate speaks; their servants listen.</p><p>But instead, Gov. Rick Snyder, who once promised not to back right-wing right-to-work legislation, instead backed rushing it through, to applause from his friends at ALEC, Americans for Prosperity and the Koch brothers. The point is to slash wages as well as to defund an institutional pillar of the Democratic Party. No retreat, no surrender.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/man_up_democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fiscal cliff&#8221; cruelty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/fiscal_cliff_cruelty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/fiscal_cliff_cruelty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hiking the eligibility age is such a terrible idea Obama can't possibly be considering it. Or can he?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to put a public service announcement on top of this post: The fiscal cliff scenarios discussed here may never become reality. The worst sellouts of liberal principles allegedly under consideration by the White House, particularly a hike in the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67, may be trial balloons by staffers, or outrages floated in order to make other compromises more palatable to progressives later. Besides, given the stranglehold the Tea Party still has on John Boehner, President Obama can afford to make bad proposals and even promises: right-wing extremists will probably never agree to the tax hikes that would force him to keep them.  He could promise that David Axelrod would not only shave off his stache but cut off his nose, confident that his advisor's schnoz would stay put.</p><p>And I admit: I've howled at reports of Obama "betrayals" before, only to find later that the president negotiated a better deal than early reports showed, Exhibit A being the payroll tax holiday and extended unemployment benefits he got in exchange for extending the Bush tax cuts after the "shellacking" of the 2010 midterm elections.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/fiscal_cliff_cruelty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/fiscal_cliff_cruelty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim DeMint, failure</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's packing up his Senate office while Obama plans his second inaugural and Harry Reid enjoys a bigger majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Bizarro World of Beltway media, up can be down and down up, especially when it comes to what's good for Republicans and Democrats. Most political developments, even positive ones, are spun as <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-05/team-obama-shows-dangerous-penchant-for-hubris-albert-r-hunt.html">particularly challenging for Democrats</a>; disasters can wind up being depicted as opportunities or even glory when they befall Republicans.</p><p>Such is the coverage of Sen. Jim DeMint's departure from the U.S. Senate to take over the Heritage Foundation. So many words have been spent on this news. I hadn't planned on weighing in, but after watching all the ways it's being spun as some kind of victory for DeMint and the Tea Party, I had to say: Enough!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/jim_demint_failure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When will Ailes rein in O&#8217;Reilly?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 20:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Ailes put Karl Rove on a short leash after his election night meltdown, but lets Bill lie about Ann Coulter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/">I wrote earlier today</a> about Fox boss Roger Ailes' humiliation of longtime "contributor" Karl Rove. After Rove's embarrassing meltdown on election night, when he tried to stop Fox from calling Ohio for President Obama, Ailes told his staff that any booker who wanted to use Rove had to get permission from a higher-up. Ailes apparently woke up and realized that peddling his audience self-soothing falsehoods is probably not the way to build a GOP majority coalition in this country any time soon. And it might even be bad for business, too.</p><p>But what about Bill O'Reilly? He had his own meltdown on election night, blaming Obama's reelection on the disappearance of "traditional America" and "the white establishment." A few days later he began an ongoing jihad against "secular progressives" and the "far left" that was as fact-free as it was vicious. I wrote at the time that <a href="   http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/bill_oreilly_channels_glenn_beck/">O'Reilly seemed to be going the way of Glenn Beck</a>, who lost his Fox show after his paranoia and anti-Obama vitriol became too much even for Ailes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/when_will_ailes_rein_in_oreilly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand old grifters rebuked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13116502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Armey gets $8 million to leave FreedomWorks, while Fox benches Karl Rove. Justice, or just pretense?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP's November shellacking is rattling the foundations of its powerful media-wingnut welfare-industrial complex. Some big names are either parting ways with former allies, or find themselves under suspicion, with their privileges to roam the right-wing fearscape spewing propaganda suddenly limited.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/29/dick_armey/">My old friend Dick Armey</a>, the former Texas congressman who made a fortune astro-turfing the Tea Party, has left the organization he helped found, FreedomWorks. <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/12/dick-armey-resigns-freedomworks-tea-party">David Corn at Mother Jones broke the news</a>, and Armey depicted the parting of ways as "matters of principle." Then AP revealed that Armey will receive $8 million in consulting fees even though – or because – he left the group, and <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/dick-armey-freedomworks-president-clashed-over-book-deal-84599.html?hp=l12">Politico explained</a> that Armey's alleged last straw came when partner Matt Kibbe signed a book contract that paid him personally for a book largely inspired by (and partly researched by) FreedomWorks and its staff. Sounds like a matter of principle, until you look more closely.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/grand_old_grifters_rebuked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Reilly lies about Fordham</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fordham University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one "banned" Ann Coulter from Fordham. Why would O'Reilly besmirch a Catholic school like that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lies came thick and fast when <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/2008785183001/">Bill O'Reilly took on the Ann Coulter at Fordham University story</a>, one month late, on Monday night.</p><p>"I didn't know this, but Fordham University banned Ann Coulter," O'Reilly began breathlessly. In fact, the reason O'Reilly "didn't know this" is that it didn't happen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/fordham_head_blasts_ann_coulter/">Here's what happened</a>: Fordham College Republicans invited Coulter to speak. Fordham president Joseph McShane wrote a letter lamenting their choice but supporting their right to make it. The College Republicans wrote a letter announcing they'd earlier "rescinded" the Coulter invitation, before McShane's rebuke, and lamenting that he hadn't spoken to them before going public with his reservations. Dissident Fordham College Republicans wrote letters complaining that their club had canceled Coulter, but none of them claimed she'd been "banned." <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/fordham_head_blasts_ann_coulter/">I wrote about all of this Nov. 9 when it happened</a>, but it was a Friday night, and O'Reilly was probably otherwise occupied.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/oreilly_lies_about_fordham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case against Hillary</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hilary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haim Saban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An admirer explains: A campaign based on her inevitability and entitlement would crash and burn like it did in 2008]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As November's election results sink in and the size of President Obama's victory becomes clearer – he won 332 electoral votes and more than 51 percent of the popular vote -- Democrats are uncharacteristically giddy about 2016. Not only is demography on the party's side, with the share of the young, female and non-white vote rising almost every year, but destiny seems to be, too. Our first black president could be succeeded by our first female president, since the party's star, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, would immediately become the front-runner for the nomination, and for election, if she decides to run.</p><p>I supported Hillary Clinton in 2008. Smarter people than I believe she will run in 2016, despite her protests, and I mostly hope she does. Chances are I would support her again. There is no other strong certain candidate in the field. Vice President Biden and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo are likely to stay out of the race if she runs. Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley probably would, or should, too. He doesn't have the stature to successfully challenge her. And there's no obvious liberal or progressive star to date. Talk about a run by, say, Massachusetts Sen.-elect Elizabeth Warren seems premature to me, as much as I admire her: Let's give her a little time in the Senate to make a difference before pushing her onto the national stage. Of course, it's still quite early, and an inspiring figure may well emerge who could give Clinton an energetic run from the left. Almost nobody was betting on Sen. Barack Obama on Dec. 4, 2005. So we'll see.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/the_case_against_hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans just don&#8217;t get it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hours after Stuart Stevens insults most Americans, Tom Davis credits Obama's victory to the "underclass"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday I finished <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/stuart_stevens_delusional_jackass/">my piece on Mitt Romney strategist Stuart Stevens</a> boasting that President Obama "only" won the votes of Americans who earn less than $50,000 – that's most people, by the way – and rushed to MSNBC's "Hardball" to discuss the GOP's diversity problems with supposedly moderate former Congressman Tom Davis of Virginia.</p><p>It was a calm, respectful conversation, until Davis volunteered that Romney lost because of Obama's voter turnout operation – specifically, his ability to turnout "underclass minorities" and "particularly those who orient toward the city" who were "pulled out of the apartments." Since we had been talking about the GOP's problems with women and people of color, I respectfully offered Davis some "free advice" – that it might be time to retire the term "underclass." It got worse.</p><p>Davis mumbled about the term not being "politically correct," and when I referenced Stevens's slur against people who make less than $50,000 a year, many of whom are actually middle class, Davis jumped in: "That's not where the voter turnout came, if you know your voter stats, it was really people who were making even less than that, pulled out of the apartments…groups that traditionally haven't voted." (Yes, I caught the condescending "if you know your voter stats.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>