<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Josh Eidelson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/josh_eidelson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Surprise fast food strike planned in St. Louis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: Walkout to include workers from McDonald’s and Wendy’s. Follows similar actions in New York and Chicago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the third time in five weeks, non-union fast food workers in a major American city are headed out on strike. Starting at 5 p.m. Central Time today, dozens of employees plan to walk off the job in St. Louis,  following similar strikes in Chicago April 24, and in New York City on Nov. 29 and April 4. Like their counterparts in New York and Chicago, the St. Louis workers are demanding a $15 an hour wage, and the chance to form a union without intimidation.</p><p>“I just feel that if we don’t stand up now, it’s never going to happen,” said Tomecka Wilson, a 32-year-old who works for the seafood chain Captain D’s. “They’re making billions off of us making little to nothing. So they can afford to share a little bit more.”</p><p>Organizers expect 50 to 70 St. Louis workers to strike over the next 24 hours, including workers from McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Hardee’s and Domino’s. The strike got an early start this morning, when a group of workers at a Jimmy John’s went out on strike in protest over alleged humiliation by management: They say their boss required them to wear signs stating that they worked too slowly. “It’s clearly getting national traction,” said Ed Ott, a lecturer in labor studies for the City University of New York, consultant for unions, and board member of New York Communities for Change, the group spearheading fast food organizing in the nation’s largest city. “This is potentially the largest organizing drive in decades.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/surprise_fast_food_strike_planned_in_st_louis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast food walkout planned in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fast_food_walkout_planned_in_chicago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fast_food_walkout_planned_in_chicago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Victoria's Secret]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking: 500 low-wage workers expected to stop working from a dozen chains on Wednesday morning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demanding a hefty raise and a fair chance to form a union, workers in Chicago’s growing fast food and retail sectors plan to walk off the job Wednesday morning. The one-day walkout begins at 5:30 a.m. Central Time, and organizers expect 500 workers from a dozen chains to participate. The work stoppage follows similar strikes by New York City <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/" target="_blank">fast food workers</a> and by <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/171868/great-walmart-walkout" target="_blank">Wal-Mart retail employees</a> across the country, and marks the latest escalation in the struggle between an embattled labor movement and two industries that increasingly dominate and define the new economy.</p><p>“At the end of the day,” Macy’s employee Krystal Maxie-Collins told Salon, “it feels like I’ve done all of this to help everyone else, to help the store, help the managers, help the customers, but it doesn’t feel like anyone is looking out for me.” Maxie-Collins, a mother of four who works part-time for the state minimum wage of $8.25 plus a commission, said she had initially been hesitant about the strike because of the risk of retaliation. But “what we are fighting for, the reason for doing it, kind of overrode the fear of doing it.” “Usually the things that are worth it,” she added, “you have to sacrifice for.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fast_food_walkout_planned_in_chicago/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/fast_food_walkout_planned_in_chicago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast food workers plan surprise strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burger King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: Workers in some 70 restaurants expected to walk off job, potentially shutting down several eateries today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated, 12:11 p.m.</strong>: The Fast Food Forward campaign says hundreds of workers are now out on strike, and that they are on track to have 400 strikers, from about 70 stores, by the end of the day. At least one store was unable to open for lack of employees this morning. Local politicians, including at least three mayoral candidates - City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Comptroller John Liu, and Public Advocate Bill de Blasio - are expected to rally with the fast food workers. Striking workers are currently converging at a Wendy's in Midtown Manhattan, a Wendy's in Brooklyn, and a Burger King in Harlem. At 5:30 PM, strikers and supporters will gather in Harlem's Marcus Garvey Park and march to a McDonald's store for the day's largest event.</p><p>Asked for comment on the strike, spokespeople for McDonald's and the National Restaurant Association referred Salon to their statements from yesterday. In an e-mailed statement, de Blasio said, "Fast Food Forward is fighting for solutions for working people right here and now, and it deserves the support of all New Yorkers."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/fast_food_workers_plan_surprise_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t believe Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/your_iphones_back_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/your_iphones_back_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxconn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13212925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The company got great PR when its Chinese supplier unveiled a new worker policy. The full story's more complicated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Chinese factory giant Foxconn – famous for mass suicides and military-style management – <a href="http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/48091254-6c3e-11e2-b774-00144feab49a.html#axzz2M1rYRWsC" target="_blank">announced</a> recently that it would begin allowing workers to elect their own local union leaders, it brought a wave of <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/04/foxconn-unions-apple_n_2613961.html">positive press</a> for its Western customers like Apple. But will it make any difference for Foxconn employees, the workers who make wildly popular products such as iPhones?</p><p>“The precedent we have for these democratic union elections is not very encouraging,” said Eli Friedman, a professor of international and comparative labor at Cornell. Even if “they’re run reasonably well, and you get some kind of activist” elected as a local union leader, “the problem is when they actually try to do anything for their members, they – as in many places – will face retaliation from management.” Worse, “oftentimes higher levels of the trade union, or the government, will collaborate with management to either make this person’s life incredibly difficult, or just force them from office.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/your_iphones_back_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/your_iphones_back_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Cruise from hell&#8221;: Don&#8217;t pity Carnival&#8217;s passengers!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/cruise_from_hell_dont_pity_carnivals_passengers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/cruise_from_hell_dont_pity_carnivals_passengers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnival cruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cruise from hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13203358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It wasn't fun on the Triumph. But its workers, usually not protected by U.S. labor law, deserve our sympathy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, Americans’ imaginations -- or at least CNN’s programming -- were <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/must_see_morning_clip_jon_stewart_mocks_the_medias_obsession_with_the_cruise_ship_crisis/">captured</a> by reports from Carnival’s “cruise from hell." Sewage-soaked cabins. Hoarded food. Plastic bags used as toilets.</p><p>The passengers escaped the ship late Thursday, five days after an engine fire disabled the vessel. But, amid the <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/15/stranded-carnival-cruise-expected-to-dock-in-alabama-after-four-days-with/">scenes</a> of bathrobe-clad passengers kissing American soil, there’s been comparatively little attention to the crew that was stuck with them -- and kept on serving them. Though they likely suffered most, the cruise workers’ misery lacks the allure of irony: They’re not accustomed to vacationing in luxury. Indeed, thanks to the efforts of Carnival and company, they can’t even count on the basic labor standards available under U.S. law.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/cruise_from_hell_dont_pity_carnivals_passengers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/cruise_from_hell_dont_pity_carnivals_passengers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will &#8220;alt-labor&#8221; replace unions?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/will_alt_labor_replace_unions_labor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/will_alt_labor_replace_unions_labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alt-Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As union membership steadily declines, new non-union workers' groups are filling the labor movement's biggest void]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> On a warm evening in July, the Chrysler Center Capital Grille in Midtown Manhattan had more than customers to contend with. Inside, diners feasted on a $35 prix fixe dinner as part of the city’s Restaurant Week promotion. Outside, protesters handed out mock “menus”: “First course: Wage Theft. Second course: Racial discrimination.” Some passersby rolled their eyes; others pumped their fists. Dishwasher Ignacio Villegas yelled: “No more exploitation of workers!” His fellow demonstrators—a few co-workers and a couple of dozen staffers and activists from the Restaurant Opportunities Center (ROC)—picked up the chant, Occupy-style.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/will_alt_labor_replace_unions_labor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/will_alt_labor_replace_unions_labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to America: Work Harder</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/obama_to_america_work_harder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/obama_to_america_work_harder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inauguration 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Presidential Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's second inaugural was the most liberal speech of his presidency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Liberal pundits and Republican congressmen agree: Barack Obama’s second inaugural was the most liberal speech of his presidency. They may be right. But just what kind of liberalism is this?</span></p><p><a href="http://www.jacobinmag.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/Jacobin.jpg" alt="Jacobin" align="left" /></a>The <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/full-text-of-obamas-second-inaugural-address">speech’s</a> claim to liberalism rests on at least three grounds. First, Obama spoke with unusual urgency about the threat of climate change — a pleasant surprise given his recent reticence on the topic. Second, he argued for a role for government in a mixed economy, including the need not to scrap Social Security or Medicare (though he also praised “initiative and enterprise,” and reiterated his call for “hard choices” to attack the deficit). And third, the president celebrated the role of collective action and organizing in American history, including by militant queer activists – making Obama’s the first inaugural address to acknowledge the existence of gay people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/obama_to_america_work_harder/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/obama_to_america_work_harder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big win for labor in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/big_win_for_labor_in_chicago/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/big_win_for_labor_in_chicago/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago City Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rahm Emanuel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[City council passes "wage theft" law that threatens license of violating companies. Will other cities follow?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By a unanimous vote on Thursday, Chicago’s City Council passed one of the strongest “wage theft” laws in the United States. The move was hailed by labor activists, who’ve long complained that wage theft -- not paying workers what they’re legally owed -- is one of the easiest crimes to get away with.</p><p>“Now the bosses are going to know that the workers have rights, too,” said Maria Garcia, a member of the labor group Arise Chicago, which spearheaded the campaign to pass the law. Interviewed in Spanish, Garcia said she’d experienced wage theft at both of the past two restaurants where she’d worked.</p><p>“Wage theft” encompasses a range of offenses. Garcia said that in her case, it had included unpaid overtime and hourly rates below the minimum wage. The term was popularized by labor activists seeking to stir moral outrage at the all-too common issue: “Wage theft” suggests that refusing to pay wages that workers have earned is a form of robbery, rather than a mere accounting dispute. Recent years have seen increasing traction for campaigns to strengthen wage theft penalties and remedies. Those efforts have also inspired a counter-attack: Last year, Florida Republicans and big businesses <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/06/florida-wage-theft-law_n_1324544.html">pushed</a> a bill that would have overridden local wage theft measures. “We believe the existing court system is the best place for these claims,” a spokesperson for the Florida Retail Federation <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/06/florida-wage-theft-law_n_1324544.html">told</a> the Huffington Post.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/big_win_for_labor_in_chicago/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/big_win_for_labor_in_chicago/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Obama cave on Social Security?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/will_obama_cave_on_social_security/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/will_obama_cave_on_social_security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chained CPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With chained CPI a likely part of any debt ceiling deal, outraged progressives are organizing in advance]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A top official at the nation’s largest union federation slammed a Social Security cut proposal that’s been floated by President Obama, but stopped short of calling it a deal-breaker in the next round of budget wars.</p><p>“We remain strongly opposed” to chained CPI, AFL-CIO government affairs director Bill Samuel told Salon. “It’s a very substantial benefit cut.”</p><p>“Chained CPI” is a proposed alternative method of calculating cost of living adjustments, which would reduce future increases in Social Security benefits. Samuel said that for many seniors on fixed incomes, even “the current system may not be adequate.” He called the claim that chained CPI could be implemented in a way that would be fair to such retirees “sort of ludicrous.”</p><p>Obama has repeatedly touted chained CPI as an aspect of a potential “Grand Bargain” with Republicans to reduce the deficit. In a “Meet the Press” interview aired on Dec. 30, the president <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50314590/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/t/december-president-barack-obama-tom-brokaw-jon-meacham-doris-kearns-goodwin-david-brooks-chuck-todd/#.UO2ZxYnjlXs">highlighted</a> it both as an example of his willingness to make concessions to the GOP and part of his “pursuit of strengthening Social Security for the long-term.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/will_obama_cave_on_social_security/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/will_obama_cave_on_social_security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Lew&#8217;s union-busting past</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/jack_lews_union_busting_past/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/jack_lews_union_busting_past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Lew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jake Lew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union busting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Labor Relations Board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Secretary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13166421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a little reported episode, our possible next treasury secretary played a critical role trouncing an NYU union]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With President Obama poised to tap current chief of staff Jack Lew as his next treasury secretary, Republicans are already attacking Lew for supposed slights during budget talks. Some progressives may bring renewed scrutiny to his time at CitiGroup. But if history is any guide, there will be little talk about another line on Lew’s résumé: The key role he played in New York University’s campaign to rid itself of a graduate student workers’ union.</p><p>Lew, the former director of the Office of Management and Budget under President Clinton, joined NYU as chief operating officer and executive vice president in 2004. At the time, NYU was the only private university in the United States whose graduate students had a union contract. By the time Lew left two years later, NYU graduate students had lost their collective bargaining rights. In between, picketers hoisted “Wanted” posters with his face on them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/jack_lews_union_busting_past/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/jack_lews_union_busting_past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Elections shouldn&#8217;t exist&#8221;: The new war on school boards</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/elections_shouldnt_exist_the_new_war_on_school_boards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/elections_shouldnt_exist_the_new_war_on_school_boards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teacher union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new education "reform" fight is over who chooses school boards: the mayor or the people. One city fought back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Election Day 2012, as voters around the country chose between two presidential candidates who both touted policies that would make it easier to fire teachers, voters in Bridgeport, Conn., rebuffed a referendum <a href="http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/Ed-board-charter-change-divides-voters-4007166.php">backed</a> by<strong> </strong>Michelle Rhee,<strong> </strong>Michael Bloomberg<strong> </strong>and the local Democratic Party. By a seven-point margin,<strong> </strong>Bridgeport rejected city charter changes that would have ended school board elections. It’s the latest round in Bridgeport’s multi-year battle over a below-the-radar front in America’s reform wars: Who should pick school board members – mayors or voters?<strong></strong></p><p>“Nobody thinks that a bunch of hedge fund managers from Greenwich are going to make their schools any better,” said<strong> </strong>Lindsay Farrell, the executive director<strong> </strong>of the Connecticut Working Families Party, one of the groups that spearheaded the opposition effort. “And the right to vote has been a hard-fought right. So people were reluctant to give it up and didn’t trust who they were being asked to give it up to.”<strong></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/elections_shouldnt_exist_the_new_war_on_school_boards/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/elections_shouldnt_exist_the_new_war_on_school_boards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Koch brothers, Tea Party cash drives Michigan right-to-work bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/koch_brothers_tea_party_cash_drives_michigan_right_to_work_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/koch_brothers_tea_party_cash_drives_michigan_right_to_work_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right-to-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13121222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why did Gov. Rick Snyder buckle on an anti-union law? Just look at his big-money donors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should we be surprised that Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, who <a href="http://www.annarbor.com/business-review/in-washington-snyder-declines-to-say-whether-right-to-work-creates-jobs/">testified</a> under oath that “right-to-work” wasn’t part of his agenda, is poised to sign just such a bill later today?</p><p>Snyder’s announcement last week that he’d support right-to-work has taken the sheen off his carefully cultivated image as a pragmatic alternative to hard-charging GOP counterparts in Ohio and Wisconsin. But it secures a dream of the anti-union Koch brothers and the American Legislative Exchange Council, whose associates are well-represented among Snyder’s donors, and whose economic agenda has been ascendant within the modern GOP.</p><p>“I think he was being a puppet for larger interests outside of the state,” United Auto Workers vice president Cindy Estrada told Salon Monday afternoon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/koch_brothers_tea_party_cash_drives_michigan_right_to_work_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/koch_brothers_tea_party_cash_drives_michigan_right_to_work_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast-food striker fired &#8212; but not for long</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Wendy's worker is fired -- then reinstated -- and the surprise strike by NYC workers sparks little backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friday, 200-some New York City fast food workers returned to work after pulling off an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/" target="_blank">unprecedented strike</a> against one of the country’s largest and lowest-paying industries. They didn’t return alone – the strikers were escorted back into their stores by squads of supporters designed to discourage managers from retaliating. And organizers say the fast food companies so far haven’t tried to punish strikers, with one dramatic exception: A Wendy’s store that told a woman she was fired, then backed down after the store was occupied and picketed by activists, community leaders, and a member of the City Council.</p><p>According to Councilmember Jumanne Williams, 10 out of 11 strikers were allowed to resume work when they arrived at Brooklyn’s 425 Fulton Street Wendy’s, but management told the eleventh that she was being fired for absenteeism. Williams said that workers provided management with written notice that they were striking Thursday, but a manager claimed not to have received it. “We tried to speak with the general manager that was there, and he wasn’t forthcoming in talking to me,” said Williams. “So I decided to ask all of the customers that were there if they would leave in support of the worker that was fired. That did happen – they left. We began to protest in the store.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/fast_food_striker_fired_but_not_for_long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In rare strike, NYC fast-food workers walk out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonald's strike]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a Black Friday action at Wal-Mart, NYC fast-food workers walk out, challenging a nearly union-free industry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 6:30 this morning, New York City fast food workers walked off the job, launching a rare strike against a nearly union-free industry. Organizers expect workers at dozens of stores to join the one-day strike, a bold challenge to an industry whose low wages, limited hours and precarious employment typify a growing portion of the U.S. economy.</p><p>New York City workers are organizing at McDonald's, Burger King, Domino’s, KFC, Taco Bell, Wendy’s and Papa John’s. Organizers expect today’s strike to include workers from almost all of those chains, with the largest group coming from McDonald's; the company did not respond to a request for comment.</p><p>But employees were clear about their reasons for walking out. “They’re not paying us enough to survive,” McDonald's worker Raymond Lopez told Salon in a pre-strike interview. Lopez said he decided to join today’s strike because “This company has enough money to pay us a reasonable amount for all that we do … they’re just not going to give it to us as long as they can get away with it. I think we need to be heard.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/in_rare_strike_nyc_fast_food_workers_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Labor chief Richard Trumka: &#8220;We won&#8217;t be taken for granted&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Working Ahead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFL-CIO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Trumka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Organized labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The AFL-CIO president talks Obama's win, the struggles ahead, and the movement's evolving political role]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unions had a good night last Tuesday. “I think we were the margin in states like Ohio, Wisconsin and Nevada, and probably three or four other ones,” AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka told Salon in a Wednesday interview. In Ohio, said Trumka, AFL-CIO members are 83 percent white. 40 percent are evangelicals, and 53 percent own guns. “And they voted 70 percent for Barack Obama.”</p><p>Building on last year’s successful referendum campaign to overturn collective bargaining attacks in Ohio, the AFL-CIO racked up 80,000 volunteer shifts and 2 million voter contacts in the state. An all-out labor effort also helped deliver victory for labor stalwarts like Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin. While unions’ effort to write collective bargaining rights into Michigan’s constitution fell flat, they beat back well-funded anti-union measures in Michigan and California that their enemies would love to take national.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/labor_chief_richard_trumka_we_wont_be_taken_for_granted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disaster capitalism doesn&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/historian_jacob_remes_disasters_arent_natural/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/historian_jacob_remes_disasters_arent_natural/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster capitalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free-market boosters claim relief is best left to the "invisible hand." Bad idea, says a scholar of catastrophes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s a reason Mitt Romney keeps dodging questions about how he wanted to defund FEMA. Most Americans aren’t crazy about the idea of handing over disaster relief to the states. And they're even less keen on farming it out to private business. And yet, in a Thursday Forbes <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2012/11/01/hurricane-sandy-and-the-invisible-hand-of-disaster-recovery/" target="_blank">Op-Ed</a>, the Competitive Enterprise Institute’s Iain Murray argued we’ve got it all wrong: Rather than showing “the need for big government,” Murray says that “disaster relief provides an excellent example of how the invisible hand of the market works to alleviate suffering and bring quick relief to those in need.”</p><p>That sure doesn't sound right. But is it? Salon went for guidance to SUNY disaster historian Jacob Remes , author of the forthcoming book "Disaster Citizenship: Urban Disasters and the Formation of the North American Progressive State." What follows is a condensed and edited version of our conversation.</p><p><strong>So are our intuitions wrong here? Is Hurricane Sandy really an argument for big business, and against big government?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/historian_jacob_remes_disasters_arent_natural/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/historian_jacob_remes_disasters_arent_natural/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kochs to workers: Vote Mitt or else!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/kochs_to_workers_vote_mitt_or_else/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/kochs_to_workers_vote_mitt_or_else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[koch industries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13042153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers like the Koch brothers stifle speech and push their politics on workers. How is that legal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week brought the second of two exposés that illustrate the twisted state of American labor law, which seemingly permits managers to urge and cajole their employees to donate to and even vote for their favored candidates, and workers to be fired for their political views, even if they express them only outside of work.</p><p>On Sunday, Mike Elk of In These Times <a href="http://www.inthesetimes.com/article/14017/koch_industries_sends_45000_employees_pro_romney_mailing">revealed</a> a political packet mailed to the 45,000 employees of a Koch Industries’ subsidiary, the Atlanta-based Georgia Pacific. The packet included a list of Koch-endorsed candidates and warned that electing the wrong people could be ruinous to the economy. The company also requires that workers get permission before running for office or joining the boards of nonprofits. One worker told Elk that a supervisor told him he wouldn’t get a promotion because he was “too political.” A local union official told Elk that he was getting calls from Georgia Pacific employees who were afraid they’d be fired for appearing in a photo with a local Democratic state Senate candidate outside their union hall, because the plant where they worked was visible in the backdrop.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/kochs_to_workers_vote_mitt_or_else/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/kochs_to_workers_vote_mitt_or_else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart&#8217;s Black Friday ultimatum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/walmart_strikers_raise_the_stakes_with_black_friday_ultimatum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/walmart_strikers_raise_the_stakes_with_black_friday_ultimatum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13036175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walmart workers are now threatening to walk out on the year's biggest shopping day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One day after Walmart employees in twelve states launched a major strike, today workers issued an ultimatum to the retail giant: Stop retaliating against workers trying to organize, or the year’s most important shopping day, the Friday after Thanksgiving, will see the biggest disruptions yet. The announcement comes as 200 workers – some of them currently striking – have converged in the Walmart's Bentonville, Arkansas hometown outside the company's annual investors meeting. It offers a new potential challenge to Walmart, and a new test for OUR Walmart, the labor-backed organization that’s pulled off the first two multi-store U.S. strikes in Walmart history.</p><p>If Walmart doesn’t address OUR Walmart’s demands, said striking worker Colby Harris, from Dallas, “We will make sure that Black Friday is memorable for them.” He said that would includes strikes, leafleting to customers, and “flash mobs.” Harris was joined on a press call announcing the deadline by leaders of the National Consumers League, the National Organization of Women, and the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement, three of the national organizations that have pledged support for the workers’ efforts. Absent a resolution, said NOW President Terri O’Neill, NOW members will join Walmart workers outside stores on Black Friday to ask customers “whether they really want to spend their dollars on a company that treats workers this way.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/walmart_strikers_raise_the_stakes_with_black_friday_ultimatum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/walmart_strikers_raise_the_stakes_with_black_friday_ultimatum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart strikes spread to more states</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/walmart_strikes_spread_to_more_states/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/walmart_strikes_spread_to_more_states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OUR walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working conditions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first-ever walkouts by warehouse workers and store employees are a game-changer]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the second time in five days – and also the second time in Walmart’s five decades – workers at multiple U.S. Walmart stores are on strike. This morning, workers walked off the job at stores in Dallas<strong>, </strong>Texas;<strong> </strong>Miami, Florida; Seattle, Washington; Laurel, Maryland; and Northern, Central, and Southern California. No end date has been announced; some plan to remain on strike at least through tomorrow, when they’ll join other Walmart workers for a demonstration outside the company’s annual investor meeting in Bentonville, Arkansas. Today’s is the latest in a wave of Walmart supply chain strikes without precedent in the United States: From shrimp workers in Louisiana, to warehouse workers in California and Illinois, to Walmart store employees in five states.</p><p>“A lot of associates, we have to use somewhat of a buddy system,” Dallas worker Colby Harris said last night. “We loan each other money during non-paycheck weeks just to make it through to the next week when we get paid. Because we don’t have enough money after paying bills to even eat lunch.” Harris, who’s now on strike, said that after three years at Walmart, he makes $8.90 an hour in the produce department, and workers at his store have faced “constant retaliation” for speaking up.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/walmart_strikes_spread_to_more_states/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/walmart_strikes_spread_to_more_states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart workers on strike</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wal-Mart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employees protesting working conditions and retaliation are flexing their organizing muscle. But the first-of-its-kind strike carries risks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, for the first time in Wal-Mart’s 50-year history, workers at multiple<strong> </strong>stores are out on strike. Minutes ago, dozens of workers at Southern California stores launched a one-day work stoppage in protest of alleged retaliation against their attempts to organize. In a few hours, they’ll join supporters for a mass rally outside a Pico Rivera, Calif., store. This is the latest – and most dramatic – of the recent escalations in the decades-long struggle between organized labor and the largest private employer in the world.</p><p>“I’m excited, I’m nervous, I’m scared…” Pico Rivera Wal-Mart employee Evelin Cruz told Salon yesterday about her decision to join today’s strike. “But I think the time has come, so they take notice that these associates are tired of all the issues in the stores, all the management retaliating against you.” Rivera, a department manager, said her store is chronically understaffed: “They expect the work to be done, without having the people to do the job.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/walmart_workers_on_strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
