<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Juan Cole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/juan_cole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:13:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Netanyahu moves forward on colonizing West Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/colonizing_palestine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/colonizing_palestine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/04/23/colonizing_palestine</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By settling in Jerusalem and expelling Palestinians, Israel is making a two-state solution impossible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2010-04/22/c_13263437.htm">The new Israeli policy of deporting Palestinians from the West Bank on arbitrary grounds has kicked in with Ahmad Sabah, who has just been deported to Gaza</a> and separated from his family in the West Bank. The measure contravenes the Geneva Convention of 1949 on the treatment of occupied populations, and it also goes contrary to the undertakings Israel made toward the Palestine Authority in the course of the Oslo peace negotiations.</p><p>The episode underlines the ways in which their forced statelessness leaves Palestinians (almost uniquely among major world nationalities) completely vulnerable to loss of the most basic human rights. That he was forcibly moved to Gaza by the Israelis suggests that many of those singled out for potential deportation from the West Bank may be moved to the small slum along the Mediterranean, which the Israelis have cut off from its traditional markets and which they keep under a blockade of the civilian population (a war crime). The Israeli establishment has decided not to try to colonize Gaza, and its isolation and hopelessness make it an attractive place for them to begin exiling West Bank residents, thus making more room for Israeli colonists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/colonizing_palestine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/23/colonizing_palestine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misreading the Quran to threaten the &#8220;South Park&#8221; guys</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/22/south_park_terrorist_koran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/22/south_park_terrorist_koran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/04/22/south_park_terrorist_koran</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's no general command to "terrorize the disbelievers"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/TV/04/21/south.park.religion/index.html?iref=mpstoryview">This CNN report on the veiled threat made by an obscure, fringe American Muslim website against the creators of the "South Park" cartoon</a> shows an extremist saying something completely untrue:</p><p>     <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" height="374" id="ep" width="416"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&amp;videoId=showbiz/2010/04/21/ac.griffin.south.park.threat.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" height="374" src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&amp;videoId=showbiz/2010/04/21/ac.griffin.south.park.threat.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="416" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>   </p><p>"Yunus Muhammad" says in the interview that the Quran instructs Muslims to "terrorize the disbelievers." It does no such thing. The Quran instructs Muslims to live at peace with non-Muslims who are at peace with them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/22/south_park_terrorist_koran/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/22/south_park_terrorist_koran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why economic sanctions on Iran won&#8217;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/19/sanctions_iran/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/19/sanctions_iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/04/19/sanctions_iran</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no good military options, and oil always finds a way around sanctions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/0410/Mullen_Strikes_would_delay_Iran_his_last_option.html?showall">Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen</a> said at Columbia University that a military strike on Iran over its nuclear enrichment activities would be his "last option." He makes an excellent point, too often overlooked. In some instances the price of doing something is just about as high as the price of doing nothing. A U.S. strike on Iran would risk throwing Iraq and Afghanistan into chaos, with our troops in the midst of it.</p><p>The Obama administration is now moving to tighten economic sanctions on Iran, as an alternative to a more direct approach. These measures include pressuring countries and firms not to buy Iranian petroleum and gas; pressuring them not to sell gasoline to Iran; and attempting to make it difficult for Iranian banks to interface with the world economic system.</p><p>While these measures could impose costs on Iran, these costs can easily be borne by the country, and more especially by the regime.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/19/sanctions_iran/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/19/sanctions_iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some terrorist groups can survive assassinations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/assassinations_terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/assassinations_terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/04/15/assassinations_terrorists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking out the head of a radical movement doesn't necessarily kill the body]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/title-2/?hp">Robert Wright argues that not only is assassination (including by drone) legally and ethically troubling</a>, but there is reason to think that it is counterproductive when deployed against religious terrorist groups. He cites the study of <a href="http://cpost.uchicago.edu/pdf/Jordan.pdf">Jenna Jordan</a>, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Chicago, in the journal "Security Studies." Jordan&#160; did a large-scale study of violent organizations that had been dealt with by the assassination of leaders, and found that such assassinations generally caused the organization actually to last longer than groups that had not suffered such assassinations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/assassinations_terrorists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/assassinations_terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama hints that &#8220;two-state solution&#8221; may be impossible</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/obama_two_state/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/obama_two_state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//2010/04/14/obama_two_state</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remarks during arms negotiations show Obama administration's uncertainty about peace in region]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hd9kAxAmPQiepMZBmilJL5AMwbnwD9F2F7FG0">President Barack Obama acknowledged Tuesday</a> that, despite the expenditure of substantial political capital by his administration, progress may not be made on Israel-Palestine peace. The AP quoted his reply to a question about how recent successes in negotiating nuclear arms reduction with Russia -- and getting 48 nations to sign on to a nuclear material security agreement -- might translate into diplomatic successes elsewhere.</p><blockquote> <p>The two sides "may say to themselves, 'We are not prepared to resolve these issues no matter how much pressure the United States brings to bear,'" Obama said.</p> <p>Obama reiterated that peace is a vital goal, but one that may be beyond reach "even if we are applying all of our political capital."</p> </blockquote><p>Obama may be right. But note the implications of no progress between Israel and the Palestinians on political settlement of their dispute:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/obama_two_state/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/14/obama_two_state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israeli regulations authorize mass expulsion of Palestinians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/israel_expel_palestinians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/israel_expel_palestinians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/04/12/israel_expel_palestinians</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The military will be allowed to imprison or deport anyone in the West Bank without the proper papers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/11/israeli-groups-attack">New Israeli regulations allow authorities potentially to imprison or expel from the West Bank tens of thousands</a> of Palestinians.</p><p>The Israeli right has long favored "transfer" (i.e. ethnic cleansing) as a means of dealing both with Palestinian-Israelis and with Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza. Given the extreme-right character of the government of Binyamin Netanyahu, it is no cause for wonder that practical steps are now being taken toward expulsions and deportations of anyone who even peacefully opposes the government&#8217;s systematic colonization of the West Bank.</p><p>The Guardian summarizes objections of Israeli peace groups who complain that "Palestinians, and any foreigners living in the West Bank," would be liable to deportation within 72 hours if they lack the right permit. "Valid permit" is not defined by the Israelis.</p><p>Rory McCarthy writes,</p><blockquote> <p>The orders &#8230; are worded so broadly such as theoretically allowing the military to empty the West Bank of almost all its Palestinian inhabitants," said the 10 rights groups, which include Ha-Moked, B'Tselem, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, and Rabbis for Human Rights. Until now the vast majority of Palestinians in the West Bank have not been required to hold a permit just to be present in their homes, the groups say.</p> </blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/israel_expel_palestinians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/12/israel_expel_palestinians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrorists are terrorists, Christian or Muslim</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hutaree_christian_terrorists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hutaree_christian_terrorists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/03/29/hutaree_christian_terrorists</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hutaree militia extremists might be Christians, but what they were (allegedly) doing was still jihad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>For more Juan&#160;Cole,</em> <a href="http://juancole.com/"><em>please visit his blog</em></a></p><p><a href="http://www.detnews.com/article/20100329/METRO/3290334/Militia-members-arrested-in-Sun.-raid-to-be-charged-today">FBI raids on the Hutaree Christian militia</a> have brought to light this formerly little-known group based in Adrian, Michigan.</p><p>Unlike the generally secular white supremacist organizations, Hutaree are explicitly Christians. Many seem to be millenarians, expecting the end of time to come soon. Like the so-called Patriot Movement, they are gun nuts. They are said to be organized to kill the Antichrist, and some reports say that they planned violence against American Muslims.</p><p>Polling <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20100325/sc_livescience/quarterofrepublicansthinkobamamaybetheantichrist">shows that about 1/4 of members of the Republican Party believe that President Obama is the Antichrist</a>, and one fears that Hutaree may agree.</p><p><a href="http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2010/03/28/hutaree-group-planned-secession-to-fight-non-christians/">Irregular Times has a good overview of their beliefs</a>, which include secession from the US and return to colonial times, perhaps in preparation for another revolution. (Will they have to register in South Carolina?)&#160; Some are antinomians, rejecting U.S. laws. They fear a liberal 'new world order.'</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hutaree_christian_terrorists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hutaree_christian_terrorists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel&#8217;s far-right government only helps Iran</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/iran_iraq_israel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/iran_iraq_israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/26/iran_iraq_israel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By thumbing its nose at the U.S. and the world, Israel makes it harder to build a coalition against Iranian nukes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The far right-wing government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may have a choice between expanding settlements in the West Bank or achieving a global consensus on the need to sanction and coerce Iran into giving up its nuclear enrichment program. Netanyahu is so dedicated to the settler project that he cannot see the ways in which it forestalls other, broader Israeli objectives.</p><p>The serious policy differences between&#160; Netanyahu and the Obama administration are helping Iran, and reducing pressure on that country.</p><p><a href="%20http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7076431.ece">The Times of London reports</a> that Netanyahu was put firmly in his place by President Obama during his visit to Washington earlier this week. At one point Obama is said to have left Netanyahu for dinner with Michelle and the girls after urging the prime minister to contact him if anything changed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/iran_iraq_israel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/26/iran_iraq_israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten reasons why East Jerusalem does not belong to Israel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/jerusalem_israel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/jerusalem_israel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/23/jerusalem_israel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israeli hawks say that Jerusalem is theirs because of a long, romantic national history there. Too bad it's made up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;Israeli Prime Minister <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/03/23/2854056.htm?section=justin">Benjamin Netanyahu told the American Israel Public Affairs Council on Monday that "Jerusalem is not a settlement."</a> He continued that the historical connection between the Jewish people and the land of Israel cannot be denied. He added that neither could the historical connection between the Jewish people and Jerusalem. He insisted, "The Jewish people were building Jerusalem 3,000 years ago and the Jewish people are building Jerusalem today." He said, "Jerusalem is not a settlement. It is our capital." He told his applauding audience of 7,500 that he was simply following the policies of all Israeli governments since the 1967 conquest of Jerusalem in the Six Day War.</p><p>Netanyahu mixed together romantic, nationalist cliches with a series of historically false assertions. But even more important was everything he left out of the history, and his citation of his warped and inaccurate history instead of considering laws, rights or common human decency toward others not of his ethnic group.</p><p>So here are the reasons that Netanyahu is profoundly wrong, and East Jerusalem does not belong to him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/jerusalem_israel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/23/jerusalem_israel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jeff Goldberg&#8217;s blood-and-soil Israeli nationalist fantasy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/goldberg_israel_nationalism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/goldberg_israel_nationalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/17/goldberg_israel_nationalism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supporting a "two-state solution" isn't worth much, if you refuse to acknowledge any criticism of Israel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Middle East expert who lived in the Muslim world for nearly 10 years, travels widely there, speaks the languages, writes history from archives and manuscripts and follows current affairs, I found that none of my experience counted for much when I entered the public arena in the United States. It isn't that I am thin-skinned or can't dish it out as good as I get it. It is that it is like being a professional baseball player ready for the World Series, who gets in the van and instead of being delivered to Yankee Stadium is blindfolded and taken to a secret fight club where people are betting on whether he can go 12 rounds with a giant James Bond villain. And he says, "But I'm not a boxer, I bat .400." And they sneer, "You will pay for insulting our great aunt."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/goldberg_israel_nationalism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/17/goldberg_israel_nationalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unmaking of the Palestinian nation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/palestine_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/palestine_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/03/16/palestine_history</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How did Palestinians end up on a tiny fraction of the land once recognized as theirs?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;On March 10, <a href="http://www.juancole.com/2010/03/israel-humiliates-biden-announces.html">I posted on the humiliation heaped on Vice President Joe Biden by the Israeli government of far-right Likud leader Binyamin Netanyahu</a>. Biden went to Israel intending to help kick off indirect negotiations between Netanyahu and Palestine Authority president Mahmoud Abbas. Biden had no sooner arrived than the Israelis announced that they would build 1600 new households on Palestinian territory that they had unilaterally annexed to Jerusalem. Since expanding Israeli colonization of Palestinian land had been the sticking point causing Abbas to refuse to engage in negotiations, and, indeed, to threaten to resign, this step was sure to scuttle the very talks Biden had come to inaugurate. And it did.</p><p>The tiff between the U.S. and Israel is less important that the worrisome growth of tension between Palestinians and Israelis <a href="%20http://palestinenote.com/cs/blogs/news/archive/2010/03/15/dahlan-churva-synagogue-built-on-ruins-of-mosque-of-omar.aspx">as the Israelis have claimed more and more sites sacred to the Palestinians as well</a>. There is talk of a third Intifada or Palestinian uprising.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/palestine_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/16/palestine_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to tell what&#8217;s what in Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/22/afghanistan_surge_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/22/afghanistan_surge_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/02/22/afghanistan_surge</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five questions about the progress of the surge]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;Gen. David Petraeus, a straight shooter, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35493976/ns/meet_the_press/">admitted on "Meet the Press" Sunday that the Afghanistan war will take years and incur high casualties.</a> His implicit defense of President Obama from Dick Cheney on the issues of torture and closing Guantanamo will make bigger headlines, but sooner or later the American public will notice the admission. The country is now evenly divided between those who think the U.S. can and should restore a modicum of stability before getting out, and those who want a quick withdrawal. The Marjah Campaign, the centerpiece of the new counter-insurgency strategy, is over a week old, and some assessment of this new, visible push by the U.S. military in violent Helmand Province is in order.</p><p>There was never any doubt that the U.S. and NATO would win militarily, fairly easily occupying Marjah and nearby Nad Ali. Marjah at 85,000 or so is a city smaller than Ann Arbor, Michigan. The campaign is only significant in a larger social and political context. The questions are:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/22/afghanistan_surge_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/22/afghanistan_surge_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Iran checkmated the dissidents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/iran_dissidents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/iran_dissidents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahmoud Ahmadinejad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/02/12/iran_dissidents</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When protesters tried to mobilize, the government anticipated their every move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;The opposition press in Iran <a href="http://www.rahesabz.net/story/10077/">says that former presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi attempted to go to Azadi (Freedom) Square in downtown Tehran</a> on the occasion of the commemoration of 31 years of the Islamic Revolution in Iran, but was prevented from doing so by a phalanx of plainclothesmen. Mousavi had been prime minister under Imam Ruhollah Khomeini in the late 1980s, but is now marked as a dissident by Khomeini's successor, Ali Khamenei.</p><p>In the crowd at Azadi Square, Green Movement supporters who unfurled banners or chanted "down with the dictator" were said by dissident web site Kalemeh.org to have been swiftly arrested by plainclothesmen stationed in the crowds for this purpose.</p><p>Interestingly, the authorities did permit former presidents Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammad Khatami to attend the huge rally at Azadi Square. Did these two give undertakings that they and their followers would not attempt to use the occasion to promote protests? Why were they treated so differently from Mousavi, whom they support?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/iran_dissidents/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/12/iran_dissidents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering, and reclaiming, the Islamic revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/iran_revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/iran_revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/02/11/iran_revolution</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iranians commemorate their revolutionary inheritance, and fight over its meaning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thursday, February 11 (22 Bahman of the Iranian calendar) is the anniversary of the Islamic Revolution in Iran of Imam Ruhollah Khomeini. This year, the commemoration is fraught with irony, since the political opposition intends to use it to protest what they consider the fraudulent presidential election of June, 2009, and the drift of the regime toward tyranny.</p><p>In an interview on February 2, 2010, former prime minister Mir Hossein Mousavi expressed this disillusionment in an interview in kaleme.org, (translated by the USG Open Source Center). Mousavi said,</p><blockquote> <p>During the early years of the Islamic Revolution, the majority of the people, including me, were convinced that the revolution had removed all structures that could lead to despotism and dictatorship. I do not believe in the same anymore. We may once again identify the elements that may lead to dictatorship. Popular resistance against the return of dictatorship is a valuable legacy of the Islamic Revolution.</p> </blockquote><p>He went on to denounce press censorship, arbitrary arrests, and the shooting of peaceful protesters in the street.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/iran_revolution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/11/iran_revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan bombing reveals U.S. troops in-country</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/pakistan_bombing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/pakistan_bombing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/02/04/pakistan_bombing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three dead Americans in Pakistani uniforms contradict claims that no U.S. ground forces are operating in borders]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;The fragile Pakistani government of Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani and President Asaf Ali Zardari was deeply embarrassed Wednesday when a massive bombing killed three U.S. soldiers on the ground in that country. The Pakistani public has been increasingly upset about U.S. military and paramilitary (Blackwater/Xe) actions in their country. On Tuesday, several <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/02/02/pakistan.drone.strike/index.html?section=cnn_latest">U.S. drone strikes killed a total of 29 persons</a>. The controversy over whether the U.S. is actually fighting a third war, in Pakistan, may have been settled by the troop deaths.</p><p>On Wednesday morning, <a href="http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/provinces/04-explosion-lower-dir-qs-01">a suicide car bomber slammed into a Frontier Corps convoy</a> of vehicles heading to inaugurate a girls school in the village of Kad, in the Lower Dir district of northwest Pakistan, killing seven and wounding <a href="%20http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=27047">at least 130</a>. Among the dead were three U.S. troops in Pakistani dress and a Frontier Corpsman. The others were schoolgirls. The attack occurred as the convoy was reaching two girls' schools, one an elementary school and one a high school rebuilt with U.S. funds. The force of the blast collapsed the high school's walls, but it was empty. Most of the wounded were schoolgirls in the elementary school, hit by flying glass and debris; ironically, given that the Taliban claim to be Muslims, some were having their class on Islam when the shrapnel hit them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/pakistan_bombing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/pakistan_bombing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The twilight struggle for the leadership of Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/iran_iraq_election/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/iran_iraq_election/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/02/03/iran_iraq_election</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iran, the U.S. and Iraqi groups dance around each other as election approaches]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to speculate a little today, but I am hoping it is informed speculation. I think an end-game drama is playing out in Iraq between the United States and Iran, and possibly among factions of Americans in Iraq, over the likely leader of the next Iraqi government. I am going to argue that the disqualification of 500 candidates, some of them prominent Sunni Arabs, is not a sectarian measure, but a strategic strike at a single candidate.</p><p>Iraqi Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi, a Sunni Arab and member of the three-man presidential council, visited Washington for consultations with President Barack Obama on Tuesday. In an <a href="http://lynch.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/02/02/hashemi_and_the_urgency_of_the_iraqi_election">interview with political scientist Marc Lynch, al-Hashimi was clearly upset about the decision of the High Electoral Commission to exclude over 500 candidates</a>, many of them Sunni Arabs, from running in the March 7 parliamentary elections because of their alleged connections to the banned Baath Party (the secular Arab nationalist party that had been taken over by Saddam Hussein in 1979). But he was apparently not sure how much U.S. intervention he wanted in the crisis.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/iran_iraq_election/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/03/iran_iraq_election/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speech was short on foreign policy thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/foreign_policy_state_of_union/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/foreign_policy_state_of_union/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/01/28/foreign_policy_state_of_union</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president didn't have much of substance to say on the region that will give him his worst crises]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understandably, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/State_of_the_Union/state-of-the-union-2010-president-obama-speech-transcript/story?id=9678572&amp;page=4">President Obama concentrated on domestic issues, especially job creation</a>, in his State of the Union address. But there were a few paragraphs toward the end about foreign affairs that I want to talk about. While I thought the speech generally strong, and the flash polls suggest that the public did, as well, I felt that there were significant problems with the foreign policy passages that signal trouble ahead.</p><blockquote> <p>In Afghanistan, we are increasing our troops and training Afghan Security Forces so they can begin to take the lead in July of 2011, and our troops can begin to come home. We will reward good governance, reduce corruption, and support the rights of all Afghans -- men and women alike. We are joined by allies and partners who have increased their own commitment, and who will come together tomorrow in London to reaffirm our common purpose. There will be difficult days ahead. But I am confident we will succeed.</p> </blockquote><p>This passage was one of the few lauded by Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell in the Republican response. But it is among the weaker parts of the speech.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/foreign_policy_state_of_union/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/foreign_policy_state_of_union/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignoring Gaza&#8217;s humanitarian crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/gaza_blockade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/gaza_blockade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/01/21/gaza_blockade</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haiti isn't the only place that needs help, but in Gaza, Israel is keeping aid away]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;When a relief plane for Doctors Without Borders isn't allowed to land by U.S. military authorities at the airport in Port-au-Prince, there is an outcry.</p><p>But Israeli military authorities will not allow any relief planes at all to land in the Gaza Strip (the <a href="http://www.gazaairport.com/history.html">Israelis destroyed Gaza's airport in 2001</a>).</p><p>We cheer when a Haitian child is rescued from the rubble, but ignore the thousands of Gazan children who are suffering malnutrition and being buried by Israeli policy, a policy that is a war crime. I am of course <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2010/01/i-know-its-not-the-same-but.html">not the only to be struck by this contrast</a>: see also Phil Weiss and <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2010/01/haiti-gaza-ii.html#hide">others quoted at his essential site</a>.</p><p>On Wednesday, 80 international aid groups called upon Israel to change its policy of blockading civilians in Gaza, because it is having severe negative effects on the health of Gazans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/gaza_blockade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/gaza_blockade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Obama win the Iraq War?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/winning_iraq_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/winning_iraq_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama's First Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/01/20/winning_iraq_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's give credit where it's due]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Hussein Obama was inaugurated a year ago, and this is a good time to review his major foreign policy success.</p><p>It is, of course, important that he has repaired the reputation of the U.S. in much of the world and replenished the stock of "soft power" that has been so important a part of U.S. success and leadership. His approval ratings in Western Europe and even in Saudi Arabia were in the 80s and 90s this summer. <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/worldview/100119/europeans-obama-anniversay">Veteran journalist Tom Fenton confirms that he remains enormously popular in Europe</a>, and that the public there understands that he could not turn U.S. policy around on a dime.</p><p>But Obama's biggest practical foreign policy success has been in keeping to his withdrawal timetable in Iraq. Most observers have paid too little attention to this, among his most important decisions. When he became president, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/02/generals-seek-to-reverse_n_163070.html">his top generals, including Gen. David Petraeus and Gen. Ray Odierno,</a> reportedly came to him and attempted to convince him to modify the withdrawal timeline adopted by the Iraqi parliament as part of the Status of Forces Agreement negotiated shortly before he took office. They did not want U.S. troops to cease patrolling independently in mid-June 2009. They did not want to get all combat troops out by summer 2010. They wanted to finesse the agreement. Reclassify combat troops under some other heading, they said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/winning_iraq_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/20/winning_iraq_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new Middle East cold war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/iran_cold_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/iran_cold_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/01/14/iran_cold_war</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahmadinejad slams Saudi Arabia over Yemen, Gaza, setting off Sunni-Shiite tension]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While American security officials are focused laser-like on the 300 or so al-Qaida members in rural Maarib province of Yemen, and worry about further strikes on the U.S. planned by this small group, a regional food fight has broken out between Iran and Saudi Arabia about a different sort of local insurgency, the Huthis, who have so far not been seen by the U.S. as an international terrorism threat.</p><p>Yemen is on the face of it an unlikely object of contention between Shiite Iran and Wahhabi Saudi Arabia. This country of about 23 million in the southwest corner of the Arabian peninsula is about 53 percent Sunni and 47 percent Zaidi. Most of the Sunnis belong to the rationalist Shafi'i school of jurisprudence rather than to the fundamentalist Hanbali school favored by Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia. Many Yemeni Sunnis are traditionalists or even mystical Sufis, schools that the Wahhabi clergy in Saudi Arabia hate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/iran_cold_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/iran_cold_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
