<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Katharine Mieszkowski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/katharine_mieszkowski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dolphins are dying to amuse us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/07/the_cove_dolphins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/07/the_cove_dolphins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 10:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/08/07/the_cove_dolphins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SeaWorld and aquariums, implicated in the shocking new documentary about dolphin slaughter, "The Cove," strike back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The riveting new documentary <a href="http://www.thecovemovie.com/">"The Cove,"</a> which opens in theaters nationwide Friday, exposes the annual slaughter of more than 2,000 dolphins in Taiji, Japan. The dolphins are among the more than 20,000 cetaceans, including whales and porpoises, annually killed in Japan.</p><p>In Taiji's so-called drive fishery, fishermen in a menacing flotilla of boats herd wild dolphins, who are sensitive to noise, by banging pipes underwater. Fleeing this cacophonous wall of sound, the dolphins are corralled into a hidden cove and speared, clubbed and stabbed to death. By morning the entire cove is red with blood.</p><p>Salon film critic Andrew O'Hehir says the beautifully filmed and highly entertaining "The Cove" is "one of the most wrenching movies you'll ever see. It raises troubling questions about how badly we have befouled the 70 percent of our planet that's covered with water, and about why we have treated the species closest to us in intelligence with such cruelty and contempt."</p><p>While the mass slaughter is horrific enough, "The Cove" raises another troubling question that hits closer to home. The documentary stresses that "dolphinariums" -- performing dolphin shows, aquariums and swim-with-the-dolphin programs -- have bought live dolphins from the Japanese fishermen, making them complicit in the marine mammal carnage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/07/the_cove_dolphins/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/07/the_cove_dolphins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pregnant women hit hard by swine flu</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/flu_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/flu_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/07/28/flu</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expectant moms may be among first eligible to receive vaccine for influenza A H1N1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first American to die of swine flu was a 33-year-old schoolteacher named Judy Trunnell of Harlingen, TX. She died on May 5, after slipping into a coma, and giving birth to a healthy baby girl by C-section. Now, American epidemiologists are finding that Trunnell's experience was not a tragic anomaly, since pregnant women infected with this flu appear more likely to suffer serious illness and even die from it.</p><p>Since April, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention believe that the virus formerly known as swine flu, now called influenza A H1N1, has infected one million Americans. Of 302 deaths in the United States to date that have been attributed to this flu, the CDC has detailed information on 266 of them, according to the <a href="http://www.salon.com/wires/ap/scitech/2009/07/28/D99NCHIO1_us_med_swine_flu_pregnancy/">Associated Press.</a> The CDC has found that 15 of the 266 were pregnant women -- or about 6 percent. That doesn't sound like that many, but pregnant women only make up about one percent of the United States population.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/flu_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/28/flu_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sushi to die for</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/27/bluefin_tuna/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/27/bluefin_tuna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/07/27/bluefin_tuna</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will bluefin tuna survive our insatiable appetite for status and taste?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This environmental crisis has everything: world-renowned chefs and Hollywood celebrities in an intercontinental food fight over the fate of one of the world's great predators, the bluefin tuna.</p><p>Pound-for-pound, bluefin is the most valuable fish in the world, prized as a delicacy at the finest sushi bars. But after decades of overfishing, this magnificent fish, which can grow to weigh three-quarters of a ton, has been so severely depleted that it swims on the brink of oblivion. Yet its prized buttery flesh is still on the menu at <a href="http://www.noburestaurants.com/">Nobu</a>, the celebrated high-end sushi chain, which is co-owned by Robert De Niro, and has 24 restaurants in 13 countries.</p><p>With demand for the rare tuna showing no signs of abating, the market for it has grown more feverish. At the highest level of bluefin mania, a single fish that weighed 444 pounds was sold at auction for $174,000 in 2001. Since the tuna jackpot can be so huge, it's no surprise that the weak regulations that exist to curb overfishing have been flouted by greedy constituents of the fishing industry, which put short-term profits over long-term sustainability.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/27/bluefin_tuna/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/27/bluefin_tuna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Born too soon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/25/lovely_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/25/lovely_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bolivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/07/25/lovely_life</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vicki Forman's twins weighed only a pound at birth. She thought they should be allowed to die. Doctors disagreed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years of trying to conceive, writer <a href="http://www.vickiforman.com/">Vicki Forman's</a> twins were finally coming. Way too early.</p><p>Evan and Ellie were only 23 weeks gestation when Forman went into labor. They were so premature Forman thought she was having a miscarriage. At birth, each baby weighed only about a pound.</p><p>"One of life's great illusions is the notion that we can want -- and get -- things on our own terms, no matter what. It's human nature to seek pleasure and avoid suffering, but what happens when suffering finds you?" Forman writes in her harrowing new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/This-Lovely-Life-Vicki-Forman/dp/0547232756/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1248460505&amp;sr=8-1">"This Lovely Life: A Memoir of Premature Motherhood."</a> "My husband and I had tried for two long years to conceive these twins, had lived through miscarriages and fertility treatments to bear them. When I learned they were coming so early and so fragile, I had only one wish: to let them go."</p><p>While Forman thought the twins should be allowed to die, their doctors struggled to save them. While Ellie lived for only four days, Evan, who endured severe disabilities including the inability to speak or see, died just shy of his eighth birthday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/25/lovely_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/25/lovely_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York Times crazy with puppy love!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/puppy_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/puppy_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/07/21/puppy_love</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is one of the most powerful women in American journalism writing about her dog?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/22/garden/pupblog.html?em">most emailed story</a> on the New York Times Web site right now is the debut of Jill Abramson's new weekly series called "The Puppy Diaries," about the first year of her new pooch's life. Abramson is the Times managing editor for news, who can more typically be found <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/02/business/media/05askthetimes.html">fielding questions from readers</a> on such weighty matters as the state of investigative journalism and Times' coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.</p><p>Let's just say the Puppy Diaries is a departure for Abramson. "She arrived almost housebroken, a wonderful surprise," the Times editor writes. "Somehow I had forgotten how much having a new puppy is like having a new baby. It's not only the made-up games, the hide-and-seek and stuffed animals. There is the special puppy smell, much like the distinctive scent, better than perfume, of a new baby's head." Yes, there is a <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/thepuppydiaries/">super cute Flickr photostream</a> of the pooch and Abramson, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/puppy_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/21/puppy_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the baby sitter up to?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/18/babysitter_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/18/babysitter_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/07/18/babysitter_history</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's the source of fear, frustration and sexual fantasy. A new social history looks at girls who care for our kids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specter of the bad baby sitter has long haunted parents.</p><p>In the '20s, a parenting guide cautioned Mom that a sitter might trundle her tender charge out on the town, so she could flirt on street corners. In the '40s, Newsweek reported that one veteran and his wife had hired a girl who turned out to be a dance-crazed "bobby-soxer" inviting friends over to party, while the toddler in her care teethed on marbles.</p><p>Since then, the bad baby sitter's renown has only grown, as she's come to play a prominent role in urban legends, horror movies, pornography and even <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqNgAlMLjhk">pop music,</a> according to Miriam Forman-Brunell's new book "Babysitter: An American History."</p><p>The bad baby sitter's a teenage girl, often dressed inappropriately, who is an unreliable scatterbrain, more interested in doing her nails or texting than the kids. When she's not glued to the TV, she's gabbing on the phone all night while eating Mom and Dad out of house and home. Or maybe she's sneaking her boyfriend in after the kids are asleep, or batting her eyelashes suggestively at Dad on the drive home. The bad baby sitter can be a threat not only to the children left in her care, but also to the very marriage of the parents she's working for.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/18/babysitter_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/18/babysitter_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overheated by clean energy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/robert_stavins_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/robert_stavins_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/07/10/robert_stavins_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the debate over the Waxman-Markey climate bill rages on, Harvard's top environmental economist sheds some light]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The groundbreaking American Clean Energy and Security bill, better known as the Waxman-Markey bill, seeks to fight global warming by implementing a "cap-and-trade system" to limit greenhouse gas emissions. But the bill, which was recently passed by the House, can seem like a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.</p><p>While the legislation has yet to be passed by the Senate, much less signed into law by President Obama, it represents the first significant climate bill to advance politically in the United States, which has been a notorious laggard on the international stage when it comes to climate change. Even so, environmentalists and political analysts of all stripes have taken issue with the bill, often for diametrically opposed reasons.</p><p>Some charge it doesn't go far enough to reduce greenhouse gas emissions quickly enough. Others contend it amounts to a vast giveaway to corporate polluters. Others claim it will unduly pinch consumers in the pocketbook, or curb American competitiveness. We turned to economist <a href="http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~rstavins/">Robert Stavins,</a> who is a professor of business and government at Harvard's Kennedy School, for his perspective.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/robert_stavins_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/10/robert_stavins_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast is best, except when mom&#8217;s wasted</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/07/bwi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/07/bwi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/07/07/bwi</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[North Dakota mom pleads guilty to child neglect ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, BWI! Yes, that's breast-feeding while intoxicated. Stacey Anvarinia, 26, of Bismarck, N.D., could face up to five years in prison for nursing her 6-week-old in front of cops when they claim she was plastered. The new mom has pleaded guilty to child neglect.</p><p>The police came to Anvarinia's home on April 13 responding to a domestic dispute. She told officers that her boyfriend had assaulted her, according to the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jF9hXfG8AJc-7hYd7BPFOuL7JZGgD99959FG0">Associated Press.</a> The cops reported that she had swelling on her nose and a scratch on her left cheek.</p><p>The boyfriend wasn't there, and has not been charged, but Anvarinia was brought up on felony child-neglect charges, after she breast-fed her 6-week-old in front of the officers. While the cops insist that she was intoxicated, they did not do a blood alcohol test on her, much less the baby. But child neglect in North Dakota charges do not require such a test.</p><p>The cops say that they know three sheets to the wind when they see it. "The majority of our problems are caused by alcohol," Grand Forks Police Capt. Kerwin Kjelstrom told the AP. "Our officers handle it so much that it is pretty much a general knowledge thing to know when someone is intoxicated. It's pretty obvious."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/07/bwi/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/07/bwi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plundering the oceans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/01/overfishing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/01/overfishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/07/01/overfishing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overfishing continues at a shocking rate, as countries break one environmental promise after another]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to stopping overfishing in coastal ocean waters, there's a whale of a gap between what nations pledge to do and what happens at sea. That's the grim conclusion of a new study published in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/home.action">PLoS Biology</a>, the first global assessment of human management of fisheries -- designated areas where fish and aquatic animals are caught -- whose coauthors include renowned marine biologists such as the late <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ransom_A._Myers">Ransom A. Myers</a> and <a href="http://wormlab.biology.dal.ca/">Boris Worm</a> of Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia.</p><p>It's well documented that many of the world's major fisheries are in shocking decline. Some <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2003/05/0515_030515_fishdecline.html">90 percent</a> of the world's big fish, such as bluefin tuna, blue marlin and Antarctic cod, have almost disappeared from the oceans since the advent of industrial fishing in the 1950s, according to a groundbreaking paper published in Nature in 2003 by Myers and Worm. And by 2048 the world's supply of seafood will likely simply run out, Worm and other marine biologists warned in the pages of <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-11/aaft-b2a102706.php">Science</a> in 2006. As of 2008, 80 percent of the world's fish stocks were considered either vulnerable to collapse or already collapsed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/07/01/overfishing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/07/01/overfishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The baby&#8217;s a&#8230;we&#8217;re not telling!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/30/sweden_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/30/sweden_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/06/30/sweden</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parents of 2-year-old refuse to reveal child's gender ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Swedish couple believe so strongly that gender is a social construction that they do not reveal whether their 2.5-year-old is a boy or a girl.</p><p>Only those who have changed the toddler's diapers know if "Pop," which is not the child's real name, is male or female. "We want Pop to grow up more freely and avoid being forced into a specific gender mold from the outset," the tot's 24-year-old mother told the newspaper Svenska Dagbladet. "It's cruel to bring a child into the world with a blue or pink stamp on their forehead."</p><p>Pop's wardrobe includes both pants and dresses, and the child usually gets to decide what to wear. "Although Pop knows that there are physical differences between a boy and a girl, Pop's parents never use personal pronouns when referring to the child -- they just say Pop," according to the English-language Swedish site <a href="http://www.thelocal.se/20232/20090623/">the Local.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/30/sweden_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/30/sweden_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rules strip-search of 13-year-old illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/25/supreme_court_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/25/supreme_court_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/06/25/supreme_court</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justices find that school officials violated teen's right to privacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a sane 8-to-1 ruling, the United States Supreme Court decided that school officials in Arizona did not have the right to strip-search a 13-year-old girl for contraband ibuprofen.</p><p>The strip-search occurred when Savana Redding, who is now a college student, was an 8th grader at Safford Middle School in the rural Arizona town of Safford. After a search of her backpack produced no banned substances, she was ordered to strip to her underwear.</p><p>Acting on a tip from another student, two women searched her for prescription-strength ibuprofen, one pill of which is about the equivalent of two Advil, according to the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5i3vPR1yPYAnnY_73qlE8tVL0h7qQD991P1800">Associated Press.</a></p><p>Redding was ordered to move her bra to the side, and stretch out her underwear waistband, exposing her breasts and pelvis. The search revealed no pills.</p><p>Writing in the majority opinion, Justice David Souter observed that the search did not take into account the relatively mild nature of the contraband at stake: "In sum, what was missing from the suspected facts that pointed to Savana was any indication of danger to the students from the power of the drugs or their quantity, and any reason to suppose that Savana was carrying pills in her underwear," he wrote. "We think that the combination of these deficiencies was fatal to finding the search reasonable."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/25/supreme_court_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/25/supreme_court_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daddy on board</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/20/daddy_shift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/20/daddy_shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fatherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/06/20/daddy_shift</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's fathers spend more time with their children than ever. One of them talks about why that's a good thing
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a father, Jeremy Adam Smith has played many roles. The 39-year-old editor and writer from San Francisco has been a working dad with a stay-at-home wife, a stay-at-home dad with a working wife, and half of a two-income couple. The kicker: His son, Liko, is just 4 years old.</p><p>In his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Daddy-Shift-Stay-at-Home-Breadwinning-ParentingAreTransforming/dp/0807021202/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1245438650&amp;sr=8-1">"The Daddy Shift: How Stay-at-Home Dads, Breadwinning Moms and Shared Parenting Are Transforming the American Family,"</a> Smith argues that fatherhood in America is changing as it comes to encompass taking care of kids, as well as providing for them. And as the recession throws so many men out of work, he contends that fluid family arrangements like his own are becoming more common.</p><p>According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are just 159,000 stay-at-home dads in the country, but Smith suggests that those numbers undercount many fathers, including him, who have served as their children's primary caregivers by day and continued working part-time at night or in the early morning.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/20/daddy_shift/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/20/daddy_shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why we can&#8217;t eat just one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/18/overeating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/18/overeating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/06/18/overeating</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We do it for the buzz. Like drug addicts. How do we stop the constant craving?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. David Kessler, 58, says that when he looks at a huge plate of French fries, he knows that if he starts eating them, he won't stop until he's wolfed them all down. Yes, even the former head of the Food and Drug Administration, who once oversaw the nation's health, struggles to eat well like the rest of us.</p><p>In his new best-selling book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&amp;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FEnd-Overeating-Insatiable-American-Appetite%2Fdp%2F1605297852%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1245266578%26sr%3D1-1&amp;tag=saloncom08-20&amp;linkCode=ur2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325">"The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite,"</a><img alt="" border="0" height="1" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=saloncom08-20&amp;l=ur2&amp;o=1" style="border: medium none ! important; margin: 0px ! important;" width="1" /> Kessler, a San Francisco Bay Area pediatrician, explains why certain foods loaded with fat, sugar and salt exert such a pull, despite our best intentions to avoid them. As he discusses the biology that leads to scarfing down a plate of fries, he delves into such puzzles as why the French fry binger is more likely to remember the pleasant stimulation of the fries' salt, fat, texture and flavor than the stomachache and self-recrimination that follow it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/18/overeating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/18/overeating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>99</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The baby died, the family survived</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/kids_cars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/kids_cars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/06/16/kids_cars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How could a parent forget an infant in a car seat?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I wrote about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/06/10/everett_carey/index.html">terrible death</a> of Everett Carey, a 4-month-old baby from El Cerrito, Calif., whose father forgot to drop him off at daycare. To the <a href="http://letters.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/06/10/everett_carey/view/?show=all">Salon letter writers</a> who can't understand how a parent could forget a child in a car seat, or who wonder how Everett's grieving, guilt-stricken father and heartbroken mother will be able to go on, check out the San Francisco Chronicle's compassionate <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/14/MNEA185OBP.DTL">profile</a> of another mom who did the same thing.</p><p>Twenty-nine-year-old Haley Wesley's 10-month-old daughter Maddison died in her car seat in May 2007 in Napa County after her mother forgot to drop her off at daycare. Wesley pleaded guilty to child endangerment charges. As part of her three years of probation and 120 hours of community service, she's given cautionary talks about the tragedy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/kids_cars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/kids_cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Auto safety for dummies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/small_cars_safety/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/small_cars_safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/06/16/small_cars_safety</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critics who whine Obama is outlawing big cars for dangerous compacts are riding shotgun with empty barrels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In May, when President Obama <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/President-Obama-Announces-National-Fuel-Efficiency-Policy/">announced</a> tougher fuel-economy standards for cars, trucks and SUVs, pundits on the right accused him of endangering the lives of American drivers.</p><p>"Proposed mileage standards would kill more Americans than the Iraq War," thundered libertarian <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=48340">Steve Milloy</a>. <a href="http://michellemalkin.com/2009/05/19/obamas-1300-car-tax/">Michelle Malkin</a> lamented the laws' "potentially lethal impact." At National Review, <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmRiYzVjYTE1ODA0ODA4ZTA3OGE4YTY3MGI3NWJkNWM=">Iain Murray</a> argued the new policy amounts to "blood for less oil." At the core of conservatives' objection is the assumption that the automakers will attempt to meet the new regulation by selling smaller cars -- and smaller cars kill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/small_cars_safety/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/16/small_cars_safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A parent&#8217;s worst nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/10/everett_carey/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/10/everett_carey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/06/10/everett_carey</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another baby dies after being left alone in a hot car.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the platform where I wait for the train almost every weekday, this morning I saw a terrible shrine. In the BART station's parking lot in El Cerrito, Calif., a light post is adorned with bouquets of flowers and a piece of white butcher paper with words of condolence scribbled upon it. On Monday, a 4-month-old baby boy named Everett Carey died after being left in his car seat in the back of a Chrysler parked in that parking spot.</p><p>The outlines of <a href="http://www.minortroubles.com/2009/06/09/baby-dies-after-being-forgotten-in-car/">this particular tragedy</a> will be familiar to Broadsheet readers, who read Kate Harding's post this March titled <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/03/09/fatal_distraction/">"You are potentially capable of forgetting your child."</a> Although this case has not yet been fully investigated by the local police, what apparently happened is a parent's worst nightmare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/10/everett_carey/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/10/everett_carey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House passes paid leave for some new parents</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/05/family_leave_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/05/family_leave_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/06/05/family_leave</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal employees would get four weeks of time off after birth or adoption.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newborns rejoice! Yesterday, the House approved a bill that would offer federal employees four weeks of paid leave for the birth or adoption of a child. The vote went down mostly along <a href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll310.xml">party lines,</a> and if it clears the Senate, President Obama is expected to sign it into law.</p><p>"Today we show that this Congress doesn't just talk about family values -- it values families," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, the bill's lead sponsor, according to the <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2009/06/eye_opener_june_5_2009.html?hpid=news-col-blog">Washington Post.</a> "As more families are relying on just one paycheck in these times, we can't afford not to help them in this way."</p><p>Some Republicans didn't see it that way. "Maybe we just ought to let federal employees take 16 years off," said Republican Pete Sessions of Texas, according to <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104994048">National Public Radio.</a> "Hello! Hello! Wake up, Washington! We're in a recession, and somebody is going to have to pay for this," citing the bill's cost of about $100 million over five years. Critics further charged that the bill sends a bad message since it increases federal employees' benefits at a time when many American employees are having their benefits cut.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/05/family_leave_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/05/family_leave_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking same-sex marriage to the bank</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/04/marriage_13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/04/marriage_13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/06/04/marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States enjoy financial fruits from allowing gay and lesbian couples to marry. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, New Hampshire!&#160;Here's yet another reason to be happy that Wednesday you became the <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/06/03/nh_legislature/index.html">sixth state</a> to proudly legalize same-sex marriage. Equality, love, justice -- sure, sure, those are the essential reasons, but have you stopped to consider the cash?</p><p>Over the last five years, Massachusetts has gained $111 million in spending from gay and lesbian weddings, according to a new <a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/BusinessBoost.pdf">study</a> published by the UCLA Law School's&#160;<a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/home.html">Williams Institute.</a> Bring on the <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2007/05/21/mead_weddings/">marriage industrial complex</a>: All those bouquets, wedding singers and towering cakes add up. The researchers found that the average same-sex couple studied spent $7,000 on their wedding, with one in 10 spending over $20,000.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/04/marriage_13/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/04/marriage_13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadly heat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/30/climate_change_crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/30/climate_change_crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/environment/feature/2009/05/30/climate_change_crisis</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A controversial report from Kofi Annan's group says global warming is killing hundreds of thousands a year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Climate change is currently killing 300,000 people a year around the world, while seriously impacting the lives of hundreds of millions more, states a controversial <a href="http://www.ghf-geneva.org/index.cfm?uNewsID=157">new report</a> from the <a href="http://www.ghf-geneva.org/">Global Humanitarian Forum</a> in Geneva. The report, "Human Impact Report: Climate Change -- The Anatomy of a Silent Crisis," predicts that by 2030, approximately 500,000 people will lose their lives to global warming annually. Even today, it charges that 325 million people are seriously affected by climate change, at a total economic cost of $125 billion a year.</p><p>"Climate change is a silent human crisis. Yet it is the greatest emerging humanitarian challenge of our time," said Kofi Annan, former secretary-general of the United Nations, who is now the president of the Global Humanitarian Forum, in a statement. "Already today it causes suffering to hundreds of millions of people, most of whom are not even aware that they are victims of climate change. We need an international agreement to contain climate change and reduce its widespread suffering."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/30/climate_change_crisis/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/30/climate_change_crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mourning in San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/26/prop_8_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/26/prop_8_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/05/26/prop_8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boos, tears and civil disobedience as California decides to uphold Proposition 8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="art r">
    <img class='wp-image-10058967' src='http://media.salon.com/2009/05/story22.jpg' /></p><p class="credit">Salon/Julie Coburn</p><p class="caption">People march in protest against Proposition 8 on Tuesday in San Francisco.</p><p>SAN FRANCISCO -- Kory O'Rourke and Kate Sheppard huddled under a tree on the sidewalk near Civic Center Park trying to shield their children, Keaton, 3, and Corbyn, 1, from the sun and waiting to hear the fate of their marriage. The San Francisco couple had been joined in a commitment ceremony in 2000, married for the first time in 2004 and tied the knot again on June 17, 2008, just as soon as the California Supreme Court's last ruling on same-sex marriage would allow it. Soon they'd learn that, while their marriage is still valid, the court's <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/05/26/prop_eight/ruling">ruling</a> upholding Proposition 8 means other same-sex couples in California won't be allowed to wed.</p><p>The family was among the hundreds of gay-marriage supporters gathered just before 10 a.m. to hear the California Supreme Court's decision on the constitutionality of Proposition 8. Most stood in the street behind police barricades, with many in the crowd waving signs that read, "We All Deserve the Freedom to Marry," and others wearing T-shirts that read "Separate Is not Equal."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/26/prop_8_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/26/prop_8_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

