<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Katie Mcdonough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/katie_mcdonough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Atlantic takes on the Atlantic&#8217;s take on online dating</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not that complicated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the Atlantic <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/a-million-first-dates/309195/" target="_blank">said</a> that online dating is ruining traditional marriage. Then, a day later, they <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/13/01/theres-no-evidence-online-dating-is-threatening-commitment-or-marriage/266797/" target="_blank">said</a> that it wasn't.</p><p>Confused? Of course you are.</p><p>Journalist Dan Slater wrote a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/01/a-million-first-dates/309195/2/" target="_blank">piece</a> for the Atlantic print edition about a man named Jacob who, through the magic of online dating, has been able to meet and sleep with many women and he is no longer interested in getting married.  In response, Atlantic editor Alexis Madrigal took to the Atlantic's <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/13/01/theres-no-evidence-online-dating-is-threatening-commitment-or-marriage/266797/" target="_blank">website</a> to refute Slater and his "spineless" argument with <em>a lot of data </em>and somewhere around 1,800 words.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/the_atlantic_takes_on_the_atlantics_take_on_online_dating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tween booted off Facebook starts his own social network</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too young for Facebook, an 11-year-old takes the Internet into his own hands. The rest is Web history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though he was two years too young to join the social network, 11-year-old Zachary Marks signed up for Facebook, anyway. Less than a week later, this happened:</p><blockquote><p>I spent all my time on the computer chatting with friends. Then, I made mistakes. One of my adult friends cursed and posted something inappropriate, and I cursed back. Also, I friend-requested grownups who I did not know. About a day later, my dad found out. He was really mad. I had to deactivate my account.</p></blockquote><p>And so begins the story of <a href="http://www.gromsocial.com/" target="_blank">Grom Social</a>, the social networking site for the 15 and under set that Marks founded after being summarily booted from Facebook. Even though there are other kid-friendly networks he could have joined, none really appealed to the preteen. "They were all childish," he <a href="http://digitallife.today.com/_news/2013/01/02/16307382-kicked-off-facebook-pre-teen-creates-his-own-social-network" target="_blank">told</a> the "Today" show.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/tween_booted_off_facebook_starts_his_own_social_network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Recessions can be hazardous to kids&#8217; health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up with widespread economic instability can have long-term consequences for kids]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://archpsyc.jamanetwork.com/onlineFirst.aspx" target="_blank">study</a> in the online edition of JAMA Psychiatry shows that growing up during periods of widespread economic instability can have long-term consequences for kids. Researchers found that babies born during the two great recessions of the 1980s were more likely to develop behavioral problems later in life than those born during boom times.</p><p>The study confirms what largely seems like common sense: Financial insecurity is stressful, and anxiety associated with unemployment and low household income can affect how well parents parent. It's easy enough to understand how more time worrying about keeping the lights on could mean less time to focus on helping with homework and strengthening family bonds.</p><p>Led by Dr. Seethalakshmi Ramanathan of the State University of New York’s Upstate Medical University, researchers used information about 8,984 youth born between Jan. 1, 1980, and Dec. 31, 1984, as a sample group. As Time magazine <a href="http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/03/lasting-legacy-of-recessions-behavior-problems-among-teens/?iid=hl-main-lead" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_recessions_can_be_hazardous_to_kids_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet-connected devices now outnumber people in the U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say hello to your shiny, Wi-Fi-enabled overlords]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone stay calm, but a new <a href="https://www.npd.com/wps/portal/npd/us/news/press-releases/more-than-400-million-devices-are-connected-in-us-homes-according-to-the-npd-group/" target="_blank">report</a> from market researchers NPD Group shows that we are now outnumbered by our gadgets. That's right, there are currently more smartphones, computers, tablets and game consoles in this country than there are humans.</p><p>There are currently <a href="http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html" target="_blank">315 million</a> people in the United States, but NPD estimates that there are 425 million devices operating in U.S. households. And with cheaper tablets and other devices hitting the market at a rapid clip, that number is sure to continue to grow.</p><p>The way I see it, we either start reproducing<em></em> or learn to speak binary code -- <em>fast</em>.</p><p>h/t <a href="http://betabeat.com/2013/01/we-are-outnumbered-the-u-s-now-has-more-internet-connected-devices-than-people/" target="_blank">BetaBeat</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/internet_connected_devices_now_outnumber_people_in_the_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona is trying to ruin Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Say goodbye to @PaulRyanGosling! An Arizona lawmaker wants to ban Twitter parody accounts ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG, you guys! It's a Twitter emergency! If Tea Party darling and Arizona House Republican Michelle Ugenti has her way, you can say TTYL to parody accounts like @SilentJimLehrer and @HologramTupac.</p><p>I know. It's awful.</p><p>Proposed House Bill 2004 would outlaw online impersonation without permission and make it a felony to create a website or profile in someone else's name with the intention to "harm, defraud, intimidate or threaten." Supporters say it will help stop online bullying. Critics argue that it could violate the First Amendment and (more important, <em>duh</em>) effectively end the national pastime of creating faux Twitter accounts to provide meta-commentary on the ups and downs of our public figures!</p><p>"The problem with this, and other online impersonation bills, is the potential that they could be used to go after parody or social commentary activities," Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff attorney Kurt Opsahl <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/01/02/bill-would-outlaw-posing-as-others-online/1805771/" target="_blank">told</a> the Arizona Republic. "While this bill is written to limit 'intent to harm,' if that is construed broadly, there could be First Amendment problems."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/arizona_is_trying_to_ruin_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Highway of the future is seriously smart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alternative Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How a Dutch design lab could make roads cleaner, safer and weirder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dutch design lab <a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/projects/#liquid-space-6-1" target="_blank">Studio Roosegaarde</a> invents weird things. And now, the brains behind clothing that becomes <a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/project/intimacy-2-0/" target="_blank">transparent</a> while the wearer is getting, <em>ahem</em>, intimate and a room that contracts and expands based on how hard you <a href="http://www.studioroosegaarde.net/project/liquid-space-6-1/" target="_blank">dance</a> in it would like to redesign Europe's entire system of highways and roads.</p><p>So they did.</p><p>According to Studio Roosegaarde the highways of the future are safer, cleaner and more environmentally sound. The lab has developed solar powered glow-in-the-dark roads that charge during the day to illuminate your evening drive, dynamic asphalt paint that transforms in response to road conditions like ice and sleet, and car lanes that double as electric car chargers by using magnetic fields under the asphalt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/highway_of_the_future_is_seriously_smart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Alzheimer&#8217;s linked to brain changes at birth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer's Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brain development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests prenatal brain development may be an important factor in psychiatric risk in adults]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers at the University of North Carolina school of Medicine have found that certain brain patterns in adults with Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia and autism can also be seen in the brain scans of infants.</p><p>"These results suggest that prenatal brain development may be a very important influence on psychiatric risk later in life," <a href="http://news.unchealthcare.org/news/2013/january/risk-genes-for-alzheimers-and-mental-illness-linked-to-brain-changes-at-birth" target="_blank">said</a> lead author of the study and assistant professor of psychiatry at UNC, Rebecca C. Knickmeyer. In addition to early detection, the study may also lead to early intervention breakthroughs in the degenerative brain disorder.</p><p>According to the report on UNC's website:</p><blockquote><p>The study included 272 infants who received MRI scans at UNC Hospitals shortly after birth. The DNA of each was tested for 10 common variations in 7 genes that have been linked to brain structure in adults. These genes have also been implicated in conditions such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, autism, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorders and depression.</p> <p>For some polymorphisms – such as a variation in the APOE gene which is associated with Alzheimer's disease – the brain changes in infants looked very similar to brain changes found in adults with the same variants, Knickmeyer said. "This could stimulate an exciting new line of research focused on preventing onset of illness through very early intervention in at-risk individuals."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/study_alzheimers_linked_to_brain_changes_at_birth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: You&#8217;re probably going to break your New Year&#8217;s resolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_youre_probably_going_to_break_your_new_years_resolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_youre_probably_going_to_break_your_new_years_resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But so will 92 percent of the population! ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new year means a new start, right? According to <a href="http://www.statisticbrain.com/new-years-resolution-statistics/" target="_blank">data</a> collected by the University of Scranton, the answer is: Not really.</p><p>Sure it's <em>possible</em> that you'll stick to that diet or learn a second language in 2013, it's just not <em>probable</em>.</p><p>A report in the university's Journal of Clinical Psychology reveals that most Americans make the same resolutions, with commitments to health, self-improvement and family ranking heavily in the top 10. And most Americans fail miserably at keeping them. How miserably? The data indicates Americans have a success rate of 8 percent when it comes to being our best selves in the new year.</p><p>But don't feel too bad: 75 percent of us keep our resolutions for at least two weeks! And two weeks on the elliptical is better than nothing.</p><p>There's always next year, right?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_youre_probably_going_to_break_your_new_years_resolution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_youre_probably_going_to_break_your_new_years_resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Language learning may begin in utero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_language_learning_may_begin_in_utero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_language_learning_may_begin_in_utero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Babies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human brain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers found that infants can respond to their native language only hours after being born]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130102083615.htm?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fmost_popular+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Most+Popular+News%29" target="_blank">study</a> out of Pacific Lutheran University shows that fetuses can learn individual speech sounds like vowels and consonants while still in the womb. The study, set to be published in the journal Acta Paediatrica, is the first to indicate that language learning can begin prenatally.</p><p>Researchers gathered data from 40 infants in the U.S. and another 40 in Sweden, all less than 3 days old. The newborns were tested on two types of vowel sounds -- 17 from their native language sounds and 17 from a foreign language. Researchers then measured the infant's response to the sounds by how long they sucked a pacifier connected to a computer. The babies could control how many times they heard the vowels by sucking continuously on the pacifier, hearing the same vowel sound until they paused. Sucking the pacifier again produced a new sound. According to Science Daily, the pattern <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/01/130102083615.htm?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fmost_popular+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Most+Popular+News%29" target="_blank">reveals</a> how infants absorb new information:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_language_learning_may_begin_in_utero/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_language_learning_may_begin_in_utero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Asian teenagers flock to get &#8220;fashion&#8221; braces</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[braces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correcting a malocclusion has never been so chic ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Braces, long the symbol of nerds, geeks, mouth-breathers and others who dwell at the bottom of the high school food chain, have suddenly become très chic. Well, at least in certain parts of Thailand, Indonesia and Malayasia.</p><p>Many teens in Southeast Asia have been shelling out more than $100 for so-called <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/fashion/asian-teens-shell-money-fake-fashion-braces-article-1.1230910#ixzz2GqWL1dIh" target="_blank">black market braces</a>, mouth gear that doesn't serve any function other than fashion -- and status. While being a brace-face stateside might be a drag, real braces cost close to $1,200 in places like Bangkok, putting dental care far out of reach for the average family. As a result, braces have become a surprising status symbol.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/asian_teenagers_flock_to_get_fashion_braces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun applications on the rise for Indian women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/gun_applications_on_the_rise_for_indian_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/gun_applications_on_the_rise_for_indian_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delhi gang rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159672</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the brutal rape and murder of a 23-year-old Delhi woman, requests for firearm permits spike ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brutal rape and murder of a 23-year-old woman by six men on a Delhi city bus last month has sparked an unprecedented debate about sexual violence in India. The attack has also inspired a record number of women to apply for gun licenses.</p><p>According to the Delhi police department, 274 Delhi women have applied for gun licenses and some 1,200 more have called the licensing department to inquire. "These include not only the average working woman, but even students who travel long distances to colleges and even their concerned parents. They were eager to find out more on the procedure to acquire arms," a Delhi police officer <a href="http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-01-01/delhi/36093841_1_gun-licences-inheritance-clause-delhi-cops" target="_blank">told</a> the Times of India.</p><p>India's restrictive gun laws <a href="http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/asia-pacific/gun-ownership-laws-trigger-indian-debate#ixzz2GqAb2C5f " target="_blank">require</a> a "grave and imminent threat" to the applicant's life in order to be approved, making gun ownership rare. The 274 applications received in the last three weeks amount to more than half of the applications submitted in 2011.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/gun_applications_on_the_rise_for_indian_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/gun_applications_on_the_rise_for_indian_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2012 was a banner year for antiabortion laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the war on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard mourdok]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[States passed 43 provisions restricting abortion last year, and zero to improve women's access to reproductive care]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2012/statetrends42012.html" target="_blank">policy review</a> released by the Guttmacher Institute, 2012 saw the second-highest number of abortion restrictions ever enacted. The ranking comes as little surprise in a year when politicians like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock became household names, and one of the House's staunchest antiabortion members got second billing on the Republican presidential ticket.</p><p>During the year, 19 states enacted 43 provisions to restrict access to abortion services, whether mandating invasive ultrasounds, blocking health insurance coverage, shuttering women's health clinics or limiting access to the morning-after pill and contraception. The record for most restrictions was set in 2011 with 92.</p><p>The worst offenders? Arizona ranked No. 1, enacting seven antiabortion restrictions, and Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Dakota and Wisconsin followed close behind with at least three restrictions each.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/2012_was_a_banner_year_for_anti_abortion_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Fructose linked to overeating</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_fructose_linked_to_overeating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_fructose_linked_to_overeating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sugar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diabetes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fructose, a common sugar in American diets, can rewire the brain to stop you from feeling full ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is your brain on sugar, folks.</p><p>Scientists at Yale University have used scans of the human brain to show that fructose, a monosaccharide found in everything from fruit to chicken nuggets, can trigger brain function that leads to overeating. According to the study, research subjects given a fructose beverage were less likely to feel "full" than subjects given a glucose beverage.</p><p>As <a href="As reported by the Dallas Morning News, b" target="_blank">reported</a> by the Associated Press, researchers used MRI scans to monitor blood flow in the brains of 20 young, average-weight people before and after they consumed drinks containing fructose or glucose. Brain scans revealed that drinking glucose “turns off or suppresses the activity of areas of the brain that are critical for reward and desire for food,” said Robert Sherwin, an endocrinologist who led the study. Adding that with fructose, “we don’t see those changes. As a result, the desire to eat continues — it isn’t turned off.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_fructose_linked_to_overeating/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/study_fructose_linked_to_overeating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief history of the end of the world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/a_brief_history_of_the_end_of_the_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/a_brief_history_of_the_end_of_the_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayan apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayan calendar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[end of the world]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look back at apocalypses past ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world did not end! That is great news! Besides meaning that we will all live to see the next season of "Girls," today's notable absence of earthquakes, floods and other apocalyptic ephemera connects us to a long, happy tradition of losing our minds about the end of the world. From 2800 B.C. to 2012, a look back at the apocalypses that got away.</p><p>[slide_show id=13152092]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/a_brief_history_of_the_end_of_the_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/a_brief_history_of_the_end_of_the_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adam Lanza was a vegan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/adam_lanza_was_a_vegan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/adam_lanza_was_a_vegan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He didn't want to hurt animals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a shared love of live music that sparked a close friendship between Russ Hanoman and Nancy Lanza more than five years ago. Now, in light of the tragedy at Sandy Hook and recent reports suggesting she was a paranoid survivalist, Hanoman is speaking publicly about the woman he knew. As he <a href="http://pix11.com/2012/12/16/nancy-and-adam-lanza-how-did-their-relationship-end-in-school-massacre/">told</a> PIX 11, “She was a wonderful, beautiful, elegant woman who loved life, and most importantly she loved her son, Adam.”</p><p>Another small detail emerged in the course of the interview, this time about Adam Lanza.</p><p>Lanza was vegan, according to Hanoman, because he "didn’t want to hurt animals.”</p><p>You can watch the full interview below.</p><p><iframe src="http://widget.newsinc.com/single.html?WID=1&amp;VID=23998386&amp;freewheel=69016&amp;sitesection=wpix&amp;w=581&amp;h=326" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" width="581" height="326"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/adam_lanza_was_a_vegan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/adam_lanza_was_a_vegan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How much is too much to share with kids?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the nation grieves with Newtown, many parents have started to restrict what their kids learn about Sandy Hook ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news out of Newtown, Conn., is heartbreaking. And there is a lot of it. As the nation continues to learn more about the victims and the terrible details of what happened inside Sandy Hook Elementary last week, many parents have begun to shield their kids from the information onslaught.</p><p>According to a <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/12/17/public-divided-over-what-newtown-signifies/">report</a> from the Pew Research Center, more than half of all parents polled have begun to restrict their children's news access in the wake of Friday's mass shooting.</p><blockquote><p>Fully 71 percent of parents with children in elementary school are trying to restrict how much coverage of the events their children watch, compared with only 36 percent of parents with older children. Six in ten parents (60 percent) with both elementary-school-age and older children are restricting how much coverage their children watch.</p></blockquote><p>Parents have long grappled with age-appropriate ways to talk with their children about grown-up tragedy, with a number of instructional <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=guide+to+talking+to+your+kid+about+sandy+hook&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">guides</a> offering suggestions. But the question remains: How much is too much information to share with your kids?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/how_much_is_too_much_to_share_with_kids/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gun control petition breaks record</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/gun_control_petition_breaks_record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/gun_control_petition_breaks_record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power to the people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A WhiteHouse.gov petition calling on Obama to introduce a gun control bill has become the site's most popular ever]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only hours after news broke of the <a title="Sandy Hook coverage " href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sandy_hook_elementary_shooting/" target="_blank">tragedy</a> at Sandy Hook Elementary, thousands took to the White House website, <a title="WhiteHouse.gov petition " href="https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/immediately-address-issue-gun-control-through-introduction-legislation-congress/2tgcXzQC" target="_blank">calling</a> on the Obama administration to lead on gun control by introducing a bill to Congress.</p><blockquote><p>The goal of this petition is to force the Obama Administration to produce legislation that limits access to guns. While a national dialogue is critical, laws are the only means in which we can reduce the number of people murdered in gun related deaths.</p> <p>Powerful lobbying groups allow the ownership of guns to reach beyond the Constitution's intended purpose of the right to bear arms. Therefore, Congress must act on what is stated law, and face the reality that access to firearms reaches beyond what the Second Amendment intends to achieve.</p> <p>The signatures on this petition represent a collective demand for a bipartisan discussion resulting in a set of laws that regulates how a citizen obtains a gun.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/gun_control_petition_breaks_record/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/gun_control_petition_breaks_record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anonymous sics Westboro again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/anonymous_shuts_down_westboro_baptist_website/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/anonymous_shuts_down_westboro_baptist_website/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hacktivist collective continues its attack on the infamous hate group, shutting down its website]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous has shut down Westboro Baptist <a title="Westboro Baptist " href="http://www.godhatesfags.com/" target="_blank">website</a> (Godhatesfags.com) with a denial of service attack (DDOS), the latest from the hacker collective after the hate group/church announced plans to picket victims of Sandy Hook's funerals. As Salon's Natasha Lennard <a title="Natasha Anonymous Sandy Hook " href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/anonymous_hit_westboro_baptist_church_over_sandy_hook_picket_plans/" target="_blank">wrote</a> on Sunday:</p><blockquote><p>Hacker collective Anonymous was swift to respond, <a href="http://www.anonpaste.me/anonpaste2/index.php?65e2832b96b888e3#Uxqr8wrq3ljskOY76+ubZQvSmcEtYCbIfZBqWpaGcMI=">releasing</a> private information of  Westboro members including email addresses, phone numbers and home addresses. This video, decrying the church for spreading “seeds of hatred,” was also released. It warns, “We will destroy you. We are coming.”</p></blockquote><p>An Anonymous source has said it intends to keep the website offline throughout the day, with plans to take it over completely and deface it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/anonymous_shuts_down_westboro_baptist_website/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/anonymous_shuts_down_westboro_baptist_website/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parents divided on gun control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tragedy at Sandy Hook has hasn't sold all parents on gun control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's little surprise that parents are talking about gun control in the wake of the the mass shooting at Sandy Hook. What might shock you is where they come out on the issue. It seems that the death of 20 young children -- and six adults -- at the hands of gunman Adam Lanza has done little to persuade some parents that restricting access to guns is the answer. As <a title="NBC News gun control" href="http://www.today.com/moms/after-school-massacre-parents-divide-deepens-gun-control-1C7625058" target="_blank">NBC news reports</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Some parents turned their shock and grief into arguments for stricter gun laws, but others say it’s time to think seriously about protecting Second Amendment rights, and maybe even arm teachers so that adults can defend students against attacks like this.</p> <p>“I do feel that those kids would have been better protected, more lives would have been saved, if someone had had some type of weapon at the school,” says Jillian Mae Hagle, of Tahlequah, Okla., the mother of a 1-year-old.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/parents_divided_on_gun_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s a &#8220;prepper&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/what_is_a_prepper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/what_is_a_prepper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prepper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doomsday preppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survivalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preppers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With reports circulating that Nancy Lanza was a survivalist, questions emerge about the movement ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an <a title="Marsha Lanza interview " href="http://www1.whdh.com/news/articles/local/south/12009331593026/gunman-s-aunt-speaks-out-about-the-conn-shooting/" target="_blank">interview</a> with local NBC affiliate WHDH 7 in New Hampshire this weekend, Marsha Lanza recalled that the last time she saw her sister Nancy, the conversation turned to disaster preparedness.</p><blockquote><p>“Last time we visited with her in person we talked about prepping and, you know, are you ready for what can happen down the line when the economy collapses."</p></blockquote><p>Since then, <a title="TPM Prepper link " href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/12/wow_waiting_for_the_apocalypse.php?ref=fpblg" target="_blank">subsequent</a> reports have suggested Nancy Lanza — the mother and first victim of Newtown, Conn., shooter Adam Lanza — may have been part of a survivalist movement known as "preppers."  And while it may prove impossible to confirm her affiliation in this loosely organized network of gun enthusiasts, back-to-the-land types and the generically cautious, the tragedy at Sandy Hook has invited increased scrutiny.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/what_is_a_prepper/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/what_is_a_prepper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>