<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Katie Ryder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/katie_ryder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A better border is possible</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A more enlightened boundary could make us richer, save lives and even help rescue the Rust Belt. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since Mitt Romney became the presumptive nominee in the Republican primary, something curious has happened to his hardline stance on immigration: It's largely <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/05/romney-fenced-immigration">disappeared</a>. Though he previously supported “attrition through enforcement” – a deeply disturbing approach already in practice in some states that sets out to make working and living conditions so bad for undocumented immigrants that they, in theory, “self-deport” -- Mitt recently claimed he would <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2012/04/18/mitt-romney-vows-study-marco-rubio-plan-allow-young-illegal-immigrants-stay/1ANVG4G7DXKBdlHsdHMXoL/story.html">"study" </a>Marco Rubio's more forgiving immigration bill.</p><p>But as Romney clumsily half-courts the Hispanic vote, conditions at our southern border are growing more dire. The brutal drug-related violence that has long gripped Mexico is on the rise. Two weeks ago, 49 bodies missing their heads, hands and legs were found near Monterey, Mexico.  A message left nearby indicated the Zetas cartel was responsible. One week earlier, 18 dismembered bodies were found in Guadalajara. One week before that, 23 bodies, with indications of torture, were found hanging from a bridge in Nuevo Laredo on the U.S. border. They are casualties of an apocalyptic drug war, a thriving human smuggling trade and, more broadly, a deeply dysfunctional relationship between the U.S. and Mexico.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/a_better_border_is_possible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Filmmakers respond to Greenwald article</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/filmmakers_respond_to_greenwald_article/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/filmmakers_respond_to_greenwald_article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12846841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morgan Spurlock, Alex Gibney and others release a letter to protest U.S. government harassment of Laura Poitras]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/08/u_s_filmmaker_repeatedly_detained_at_border/" target="_blank">On Sunday</a>, Glenn Greenwald reported that Laura Poitras – the Oscar- and Emmy-nominated filmmaker behind "My Country, My Country" and "The Oath" – has been subject to extraordinary and deeply troubling scrutiny by American officials. Poitras has been detained by the U.S. government 36 times in the last six years – almost every time she’s returned to the country from work abroad. The filmmaker has repeatedly been subject to harassment, intimidation and unwarranted, invasive searches, while her phone, laptop, reporter’s notebook and other materials have been confiscated and copied.  Last week, she was prohibited from taking notes on her own interrogation because her pen “could be used as a weapon."</p><p>As Greenwald pointed out, Poitras' case is a glaring example of the government’s continued disregard of Fourth Amendment rights as they apply to journalists and documentary filmmakers working on subject matter related to U.S. military operations, American foreign policy and any other domain claimed by the Department of Homeland Security.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/filmmakers_respond_to_greenwald_article/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/filmmakers_respond_to_greenwald_article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kinkade&#8217;s world of parody</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/kinkades_world_of_parody/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/kinkades_world_of_parody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Kinkade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12835271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Painter of Light's work is quaint, nostalgic and trite -- and an inspiration for satirists everywhere]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Kinkade, the self-anointed Painter of Light™, and artist behind the once-profitable later-fraudulent Thomas Kinkade Signature Galleries enterprise, died unexpectedly on Friday of natural causes.  Kinkade’s appeal to his fans, as Laura Miller <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/thomas_kinkade_the_george_w_bush_of_art/">wrote</a> on Salon today, is in its “aura of harmless coziness, of modest domestic beauty and comfort” – the same things that make his work a giant, glaring bull’s-eye for parody. On dozens of websites, artists and Photoshop dabblers have taken Kinkade’s images of glowing, pastoral peace and added … we’ll call them <em>contradictory splashes</em>. We've put together a slide show of some of the most memorable.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/kinkades_world_of_parody/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/09/kinkades_world_of_parody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secrets of creation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/secrets_of_creation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/secrets_of_creation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12817051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Tommy Wiseau\'s \"The Room\" to Werner Herzog, what makes people want to make art? Tom Bissell explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his new book of collected essays, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/magic-hours-tom-bissell/1105832630">"Magic Hours,"</a> Tom Bissell writes that literary and artistic success have always been, overwhelmingly, a matter of luck.  The works of Herman Melville, Walt Whitman and Emily Dickinson, though great, are known today as classics because of the slightest, fortuitous turns of circumstance – turns entirely beyond the authors’ control. "Moby-Dick" was met with near universal scorn, until it was found by a sympathetic critic in a used bookstore in 1916, 25 years after Melville’s death. A remaindered copy of "Leaves of Grass" was also happened upon – this time bought from a book peddler and given to a critic as a gift.</p><p>For some ambitious writers and creators, this can be reason for panic, as it was for Bissell as a young man. But over the course of "Magic Hours’" sharply observed, lushly descriptive and often extremely funny pages, Bissell (a former Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/writer/tom_bissell/">writer</a> and the author of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/20/tom_bissell_extra_lives_interview_ext2010/">"Extra Lives: Why Video Games Matter"</a>) presents a case for art-for-art’s-sake, regardless of what may come.  And, though Bissell has no aspirations to be included in the “how-to” genre of nonfiction, "Magic Hours" subtly discloses a type of directive for new and young artists making their way.  Quite simply and hopefully, it seems to be: tell the truth about yourself and everything else, and pay attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/secrets_of_creation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/07/secrets_of_creation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After the climax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/after_the_climax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/after_the_climax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12676411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New science offers tantalizing insights into the meaning of what we do post-sex, from sleeping to cuddling]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve learned in sultry old romances and indie films about ill-advised affairs that we like to smoke between the sheets. People like to fix late night sandwiches, cuddle, talk about the future, take a shower. Every sitcom ever made posits that men don't want women to talk after sex. And everyone seems to think it matters who falls asleep first.</p><p>But does it really? In recent years, a small number of researchers have been working to develop the science of post-coitus -- a field that's barely been touched.</p><p>I spoke with Daniel Kruger and Susan Hughes, evolutionary psychologists at the University of Michigan and Albright College in Pennsylvania who have been working on uncovering the secrets of post-sex behavior. “There is so much attention, in the popular literature in psychology and even in evolutionary research, looking at everything leading up to the act of sex,” said Kruger. “But then there isn’t anything about what happens after.  It’s as if the attitude is, ‘oh, of course sex is the end goal, right?’ We’re making the point that the time that couples spend together after sex is an important part of healthy sexual relationships.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/after_the_climax/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/15/after_the_climax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Girl Scout haters&#8217; biggest mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/the_girl_scout_haters_biggest_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/the_girl_scout_haters_biggest_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girl Scouts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12468321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ignore the backlash: GSUSA represents exactly the kind of community-based organization conservatives should love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week Indiana State Rep. Bob Morris claimed, in an open letter <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a href="http://www.journalgazette.net/article/20120220/BLOGS01/120229962/-1/blogs">magnificently disdainful of facts</a></span>, that Girls Scouts of the USA financially supports Planned Parenthood and is a force of pro-sex, pro-abortion, pro-homo indoctrination, determined to reach our American daughters.  Since his original refusal to sign an Indiana statehouse resolution honoring the 100th anniversary of the GSUSA, Morris has made a nonsensical apology, saying that he “should never have written the letter,” while holding to the counterfactual argument that the GSUSA is partnered with Planned Parenthood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/the_girl_scout_haters_biggest_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/02/the_girl_scout_haters_biggest_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inside the new hate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/inside_the_new_hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/inside_the_new_hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12291731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing rhetoric seems to have reached new heights of xenophobia. But is that true? An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's easy to interpret the verbal bile of recent American politics as a new height in prejudiced and conspiracist thinking: a new hate. In the last few years, Sarah Palin has created the concept of Obama's “death panels,” Glenn Beck has argued that George Soros was a collaborator with the Nazis during WWII -- even though Soros is Jewish -- and Donald Trump staked his presidential campaign on the idea that our president, black as he is and Muslim as his name seems to be, had not sufficiently proven his rights to citizenship in our country. More recently, Newt has taken to calling Obama the "food stamp president," a title that is as racially charged as it is inaccurate.</p><p>But Arthur Goldwag, author of the new book <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/new-hate-arthur-goldwag/1100572480?ean=9780307379696&amp;itm=1&amp;usri=arthur+goldwag">"The New Hate: A History of Fear and Loathing on the Populist Right,"</a> argues that the racist and conspiracist approach of today's far-right pundits is largely the same as it was 50 years ago.  Their language and theories are taken (sometimes verbatim) from right-wing populist vitriol at early times in American and European history, dealing in tropes well-worn by pre-WWII American Nazis, Joe McCarthy and fanatical anti-Catholic and anti-Masonic Protestant preachers of the 19th century.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/inside_the_new_hate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/04/inside_the_new_hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>202</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
