<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Kerry Lauerman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/kerry_lauerman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 12:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Urgent reports from a Salon original</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/urgent_reports_for_a_salon_original/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/urgent_reports_for_a_salon_original/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12686421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A U.N. report backs Glenn Greenwald's reporting on Bradley Manning -- a typical week in our one-man truth squad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m interrupting Salon’s regular programming to point out the shockingly important impact produced by our one-man truth patrol, Glenn Greenwald, in just this past week. There was the United Nations <a href="http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/rights/un-announcement-manning-year-too-late">report</a> that confirmed Glenn’s reports of more than a year ago that the United States’ treatment of Bradley Manning was “cruel, inhumane and degrading.” There was the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/10/dennis_kucinich_and_wackiness/singleton/">necessary corrective </a>to all those liberals dancing on Dennis Kucinich’s congressional grave. There was his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/12/washingtons_high_powered_terrorist_supporters/">takedown</a> of the Washington insider-lobbyists who get away with representing terrorist groups for high fees while others are imprisoned for seemingly far less. There was the urgent case on behalf of the Yemeni journalist the U.S. all but <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/14/obamas_personal_role_in_a_journalists_imprisonment/singleton/">imprisoned</a> for his critical reporting. And then today, an exposing of an <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/npr_and_nyt_on_americans_v_afghans/singleton/">insidious spin </a>around the latest atrocity in Afghanistan, by two of what are supposedly our most fair and impartial news sites.</p><p>This great work is possible thanks to those of you who have supported Salon and become members of Salon Core, our membership program (read more about it <a href="https://sub.salon.com/premium/">here</a>). To the rest of you: If the work Glenn does is important to you, I hope you’ll join, too. Great work needs great supporters. And the Core perks are pretty cool, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/urgent_reports_for_a_salon_original/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/16/urgent_reports_for_a_salon_original/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our bold new future</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/our_bold_new_future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/our_bold_new_future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10103086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon’s not just moving faster -- we’re moving smarter, too. Inside our ambitious editorial changes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Salon you're reading today is a bolder, faster machine. We've liberated 15 years of accumulated pixels from our earthbound servers and released them into the Web cloud. We're experiencing some expected technical hiccups along the way, but we're heading in an exciting direction</p><p>Salon doesn't just feel different. It is different. Along with this speedy new publishing platform, we're taking a bolder editorial direction. We're doing more of the deep, provocative reporting that you, our readers, have asked us for – the kind that is pursued less and less in the media. Salon is making a stronger commitment to do what we've always done best: speak the uncomfortable truths, and uncover the stories that those in power want to keep hidden.</p><p>Like a lot of our online peers, we've toyed with the shorter-faster-punchier approach in recent years, chronicling what mattered with a speed that matched readers' habits, cheerfully grazing on Twitter sprouts or Tumblr bonbons. We'll continue to be fast when it matters. But we know our readers want more than aggregated cheat sheets; they don't want to just seem smarter, they want to be smarter. So we're increasing our deep dives into the important and fascinating stories of our time, and offering more investigative reports that require time and care to develop. We're plunging into this deep and passionate journalism because we know that these critical times (captured well <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/talbot_letter_to_readers/">here</a> by our returning founder David Talbot) demand it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/our_bold_new_future/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/03/our_bold_new_future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News: Salon is dying!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/if_fox_says_we_re_failing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/if_fox_says_we_re_failing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/08/26/if_fox_says_we_re_failing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using its tried-and-tired formula, the Ailes network takes some potshots at us. I wonder why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a perversely exciting turn this week, the tireless water-carriers of Fox News turned their sights on Salon, placing us on a short list of "once popular sites" that are "dead or dying." It's an odd list that lumps user platforms (Bebo, MySpace, Blogger), communities (Digg, Slashdot), Chatroulette, and two content sites: Salon and Gawker. Hey, it's the Internet: Everything is a "site," I suppose.</p><p>The story's art clumsily, hilariously, seems to include Fox News in its loser lineup (I&#160;like to imagine it as the subversive handiwork of a pissed-off graphic designer):</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10006652' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/08/fox2.jpg' />
  </p><p>The write-up has Salon shedding readers like scales from Roger Ailes' backside -- "losing about 1 million regular visitors over the past year, a 37 percent decline."&#160;The fizzling started "almost immediately last November when the main editor, Joan Walsh, took a back-seat to write a new book." Fox reports that we're "ad-heavy"&#160;(not actually a bad thing for a site relying on ad revenue, by the way) and that we have a hard time competing with the "classier"&#160;New Yorker.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/if_fox_says_we_re_failing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/26/if_fox_says_we_re_failing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of Dan Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/16/dan_savage_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our favorite stuntman talks about his new Rick Santorum plot and why he won't believe Obama -- but supports him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evolution of Dan Savage from sex columnist to political stunt artist has been an inspiring, and often really dirty, tale.</p><p>Early readers who discovered his <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=9435660">Savage Love</a> advice column (which he launched in 1991 for Seattle's the Stranger and which went into heavy syndication in the nation's free weeklies) were first jarred by how readers' questions began -- "Hey, Faggot," Savage's attempt to reclaim and defuse the word -- then hooked by his remarkably candid style. In that just barely pre-Internet world, when sex was a subject left to breathy advice columnists in the glossies and late-night radio, Savage was like a breath of fresh air. Or maybe a quick whiff of poppers.</p><p>His was a blazing, rude voice bursting out in a '90s culture still weirded out by reports of teens, gays and presidents actually having sex. Along the way, he dropped the "faggot" tag, created a wildly popular podcast, and coined irresistible expressions -- from "GGG" (his advice that partners should be "good, giving and game"), to "pegging" and "diamondbacking" (go ahead, look them up) -- that are as rudely hilarious as he is. He's got a show <a href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/04/03/Dan_Savage_Heading_to_Mtv/">slated for MTV</a>, and he's emerged as the leading voice not only on sex information but also sexual identity, and may well be the most effective gay rights spokesman around.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The many faces of &#8220;Humiliation&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/31/humiliation_wayne_koestenbaum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/31/humiliation_wayne_koestenbaum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/07/31/humiliation_wayne_koestenbaum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A culture critic flashes the world his own personal shame -- and gives us a good look at our own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since poet and critic Wayne Koestenbaum broke onto the scene with his acclaimed "The Queen's Throat," which theorized about the distinct connection between gay men and opera, his dazzlingly personal approach to his subjects has been known to draw both intense loyalty and furious detractors (his deconstructed approach to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, for example, "Jackie Under My Skin," seemed to draw exclusively either raves or raspberries).</p><p>But his subjective approach can, at minimum, offer illuminating deconstructions of his own complex emotions, and also often captures a larger truth about the way we think or feel. When he says, "I don't know if that's true, but I feel it very deeply as fact"&#160;-- as he does in the interview below -- it's likely to drive the more literal reader a little bonkers. But Koestenbaum follows his own internal compass of what counts, and it can lead him to sparkling insights about human nature that all those "Tipping Point" knockoffs can't match. He's a master at overthinking a simple subject to both an exhaustive -- and endlessly exhilarating -- degree.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/31/humiliation_wayne_koestenbaum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/31/humiliation_wayne_koestenbaum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How we came to misunderstand dogs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/05/john_bradshaw_dog_sense/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/05/john_bradshaw_dog_sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2011/06/05/john_bradshaw_dog_sense</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Throw out the choke chain and shush those dog whisperers. A new book turns our understanding about dogs on its head]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's news that should shock and delight dog owners, scolded for decades by trainers and dog whisperers that they must relentlessly assert their dominance over their dogs: Yes, it's perfectly acceptable to let Fido sleep in your bed.</p><p>You can also let him enter a room before you, and you can let him win at a game of tug of war, all without fearing that you will somehow signal that you are the submissive one and he is in charge. Contrary to long-cherished theories, dogs aren't competing with us for position in the pack, but are largely performing for our approval. And that -- no matter what the <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2005/02/16/dog_whisperer">Cesar Millans</a> of the world would have you believe -- is because much of what we've been led to be believe about dogs' hard-wired behavior has been totally wrong.</p><p>In his densely illuminating new book, <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Dog-Sense/John-Bradshaw/e/9780465019441">"Dog Sense: How the New Science of Dog Behavior Can Make You a Better Friend to Your Pet,"</a>&#160; John Bradshaw explains how our understanding has been skewed by deeply flawed research, and exploited by a sensationalized media. In place of the rigid, often violent, alpha-led wolf societies we once believed produced the modern dog were actually cooperative, familial groups. And in place of the choke-chain school of negative reinforcement should be a training program based primarily on the positive.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/05/john_bradshaw_dog_sense/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/05/john_bradshaw_dog_sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even more David Sirota &#8212; in Salon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/sirota_to_salon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/sirota_to_salon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/05/11/sirota_to_salon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our man in Denver brings his political and pop culture obsessions to us now, daily]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Sirota's been writing so much for Salon recently that we thought we'd just go ahead and make it official:&#160;He's a contributing writer now, and will be updating his blog here throughout the week.</p><p>We're thrilled. David patrols a distinct -- and classic Salon -- intersection of politcs and culture; for those of us who obsess as mightily about movies as we do the great political debates, he's a trusted voice. I like to think his Denver outpost gives him a better view of the whole country, without the distractions of the West Coast cause du jour or the myopia of the East Coast chattering class. It lets him see issues that other blinkered peers miss, as when he raised&#160; questions about the wild -- and wildly hyped -- response to the death of Osama bin Laden (a <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/05/02/osama_and_chants_of_usa">monster post</a>, which many are still talking about).</p><p>Read him <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/">here</a>. Follow him on <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/davidsirota">Twitter</a>. Listen to his <a href="http://www.am760.net/pages/DavidSirota.html">radio show</a>. Buy his great <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Back-to-Our-Future/David-Sirota/e/9780345518781/?itm=3&amp;USRI=sirota">new book</a>.&#160;You won't be disappointed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/sirota_to_salon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/sirota_to_salon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So, Gilbert Gottfried, about those tsunami jokes &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/24/gilbert_gottfried_aflac_rubber_balls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/24/gilbert_gottfried_aflac_rubber_balls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilbert Gottfried]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan Earthquake]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2011/04/24/gilbert_gottfried_aflac_rubber_balls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gilbert Gottfried talks about the jokes that cooked his goose with Aflac, and the great virtue in a good shock]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It had been about a month since Gilbert Gottfried lobbed those brutally crude jokes about the Japanese tsunami when I met him earlier this week. He still seemed a little stunned by the reaction, which included a public drubbing by the morality police, and being fired as the voice of the Aflac spokesduck. Still, he couldn't quite make himself grovel for forgiveness. "You start to feel sorry, and then you wonder what you're feeling sorry for," he says. "That I made jokes?"</p><p>Sure, they weren't just any jokes. (Buzzfeed has ranked the <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/the-10-worst-gilbert-gottfried-tsunami-jokes">most jaw-dropping</a> of them.) But in many ways, they are typical ones for Gottfried, 56, who has paved a long career with the shock and awe of the taboo. He is famous for his version of the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGVL_reIuJM">notorious "Aristocrats" joke</a>, delivered a mere three weeks after Sept. 11, at a New York Friars Club roast for Hugh Hefner, which has somewhat romantically been christened (by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/13/arts/13Rich.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=">Frank Rich</a>, the New York Observer and the film made in honor of the joke) as the moment it was OK to laugh again. That epic release was made possible, though, only by the World Trade Center joke Gottfried detonated right before, which drew boos, hisses and the refrain that could wind end up as Gottfried's epitaph: "Too soon!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/24/gilbert_gottfried_aflac_rubber_balls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/24/gilbert_gottfried_aflac_rubber_balls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our new partners: Imprint</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/imprint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/imprint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/04/18/imprint</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Print magazine's online design community begins contributing to Salon. Color us delighted!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm pleased to announce that we're launching a new partnership with Print magazine -- the 70-year-old standard-bearer for the world of graphic arts. Beginning today, we'll be posting daily from <a href="http://imprint.printmag.com/">Imprint</a>, the magazine's online design community, which will offer posts on all varieties of visual culture. It's a great site -- we're thrilled to run some of its fine work.</p><p>Check out today's <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2011/04/18/tax_day_color_of_money_imprint/index.html">first post</a> -- a Tax Day romp through the world's currencies -- and tell us what you think.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/imprint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/18/imprint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A disturbing threat against one of our own</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/11/threats_against_glenn_greenwald_wikileaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/11/threats_against_glenn_greenwald_wikileaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WikiLeaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/02/11/threats_against_glenn_greenwald_wikileaks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: An alleged plot to destroy WikiLeaks targets Glenn Greenwald. We want to know who is responsible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>(Updated below)</strong>
  </p><p>We take threats against our own very seriously.</p><p>A bizarre plan for an attack on the whistle-blowing site WikiLeaks and journalists construed as sympathetic to it -- first reported by <a href="http://www.thetechherald.com/article.php/201106/6798/Data-intelligence-firms-proposed-a-systematic-attack-against-WikiLeaks">the Tech Herald</a> -- clearly targets Salon's Glenn Greenwald, saying that his "level of support" for WikiLeaks "needs to be disrupted." The report (you can download the purported final draft <a href="http://wikileaks.ch/IMG/pdf/WikiLeaks_Response_v6.pdf">here</a>) is listed as an "overview by Palantir Technologies, HBGary Federal and Berico Technologies," and according to a string of e-mails also leaked, was developed following a request from Hunton and Williams, a law firm that represents, among others, Bank of America.</p><p>Bank of America is the presumed next target of WikiLeaks, and has reportedly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/03/business/03wikileaks-bank.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=print">been bracing</a> for what's to come.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/11/threats_against_glenn_greenwald_wikileaks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/11/threats_against_glenn_greenwald_wikileaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>206</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patton Oswalt battles his demons (and zombies)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/patton_oswalt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/patton_oswalt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/01/23/patton_oswalt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedian talks about his very funny new book, '80s nerd nostalgia and what makes a terrible stand-up comic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know Patton Oswalt. As I prepared to talk to the comedian about his terrific, Gen X-era cultural memoir "<a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Zombie-Spaceship-Wasteland/Patton-Oswalt/e/9781439149089/?itm=3&amp;USRI=patton+oswalt">Zombie, Spaceship, Wasteland</a>," nearly everyone I mentioned him to had an immediate, very specific response. They were, in order:</p><p>"I loved 'Big Fan.' "</p><p>"I wish 'Comedians of Comedy' would come back."</p><p>"The voice of '<a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=2&amp;ved=0CBoQFjAB&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.salon.com%2Fent%2Fmovies%2Freview%2F2007%2F06%2F29%2Fratatouille%2F&amp;ei=HQk6Tf-bONH0gAfru6DICA&amp;usg=AFQjCNEs6Qqxf3R_1NRMrIDiZnarnrEe9w&amp;sig2=XlPqi9TcTAR8snOfOckudA">Ratatouille</a>'!"</p><p>"Spence, from 'King of Queens!"</p><p>"He was the best thing about 'The Hangover.' "</p><p>Actually, he never appeared in "The Hangover." My friend had confused him with fellow "<a href="http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/comedians_of_comedy/index.jhtml">Comedians of Comedy</a>" member and charmingly gnomish funnyman Zach Galifianakis. But it's a testament to how ubiquitous Oswalt is that, after nearly a decade of seeing him on stage, on TV and in films, you can have a vivid recollection of one particular performance yet have a hard time pinning down who he actually is.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/patton_oswalt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/23/patton_oswalt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the vaccine panic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon talks to "Panic Virus" author Seth Mnookin about America's problem with autism conspiracies -- and our own]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The anti-vaccine crusade remains one of the enduring, heart-rending mysteries of our young century. Despite all reasonable evidence showing that failing to vaccinate children puts them at enormous risk, an astonishing number of parents hold off anyway because of scientifically unproven fears that it could lead to the onset of autism or other conditions. More mystifying still: The parents susceptible to vaccine conspiracy theories often are well-educated, liberal-minded denizens -- people just like Salon readers -- in upscale areas like Marin County, Calif., which has the fifth-highest average-per-capita income in the U.S., but whose parents bypass vaccines at three times the rate of the rest of the state; or in Ashland, Ore., where the exemption rate is an astounding 30 percent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>124</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Correcting our record</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We've removed an explosive 2005 report by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about autism and vaccines. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2005, Salon published online an exclusive story by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. that offered an explosive premise: that the mercury-based thimerosal compound present in vaccines until 2001 was dangerous, and that he was "convinced that the link between thimerosal and the epidemic of childhood neurological disorders is real."</p><p>The piece was co-published with Rolling Stone magazine -- they fact-checked it and published it in print; we posted it online. In the days after running "Deadly Immunity," we amended the story with five corrections (which can still be found <a href="http://www.salon.com/letters/corrections/2005/index.html">logged here</a>) that went far in undermining Kennedy's expos&#233;. At the time, we felt that correcting the piece -- and keeping it on the site, in the spirit of transparency -- was the best way to operate. But subsequent critics, including most recently, Seth Mnookin in his book <a href="http://salon.com/life/feature/2011/01/16/seth_mnookin_panic_virus_autism/index.html">"The Panic Virus,"</a> further eroded any faith we had in the story's value. We've grown to believe the best reader service is to delete the piece entirely.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/16/dangerous_immunity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New year&#8217;s changes at Salon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/seitz_and_tcf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/seitz_and_tcf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2011/01/07/seitz_and_tcf</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new  voice on TV, and a farewell (of sorts) to Broadsheet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>Updated below</strong>
  </p><p>2011 has brought some new changes at Salon, and I wanted to fill you in on them. First:</p><p><strong>Matt Zoller Seitz</strong>, who has been contributing regularly to Salon since his <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/directors_of_the_decade/index.html">sensational series</a> just over a year ago, is joining the staff as our full-time TV writer. It's not Matt's first run at this -- he's done standout work as a critic at the Newark Star-Ledger, New York Press and New York Times; and his influential arts site, The House Next Door, set a high bar for critical discourse online. But we really expect him to break outside the usual confines of the critic's role. His recent multimedia look at <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/greatest_film_scenes_of_2010/index.html">2010's best film scenes</a> is the type of innovative work we're looking for him to produce for Salon -- and yes, he'll continue his immensely popular <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/friday_night_seitz/index.html">Friday Night Seitz</a> slide shows. He was made for this medium. Follow him <a href="http://www.salon.com/author/matt_zoller_seitz/index.html">here</a> (<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/mattzollerseitz">Twitter</a>), and give him plenty of feedback -- he even looks forward to answering your comments.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/seitz_and_tcf/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/07/seitz_and_tcf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 from 2010: Our favorite Salon stories</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/10_for_2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/10_for_2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2010/12/31/10_for_2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One final look back at our own work, and what we liked best]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't worry &#8212; the tsunami of Best Of lists is almost over. I think we're all looking forward to the fresh mystery of the new year. And right now, our necks ache from looking back so much; we're particularly sick of the forced remembering of Christine O'Donnell and the Trololo guy. To the annals of footnoted history, we banish ye!</p><p>But we did want to highlight the pieces in Salon that &#8212; through an unscientific staff poll &#8212; we decided we liked the best this year. None of these should be a huge surprise to Salon readers; they were all big hits with you, too. From Glenn Greenwald's incisive exploration of WikiLeaks, to Mary Elizabeth Williams' gripping accounts of her cancer diagnosis and treatment, our favorite stories this year run a familiar Salon gamut of world-changing importance to the expressly, meaningfully personal.</p><p>And with no more fanfare than that, in chronological order, our 10 staff favorites:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/10_for_2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/31/10_for_2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our 15 biggest stories &#8212; ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/15_years_15_biggest_stories/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/15_years_15_biggest_stories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide Shows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2010/12/17/15_years_15_biggest_stories</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's our 15th birthday! And to celebrate, we're honoring our greatest hits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been 15 years since Salon first materialized on computer screens, a curious publishing project out of San Francisco created by a team of ex-newspaper staffers looking to craft a shimmering, pixelated version of what they hoped journalism could be.</p><p>It took a great many twists and turns before it became the Salon that exists today. But if there's one animating idea that continues to describe us it's the idea of a <a href="http://www.jdlasica.com/1998/06/08/salon-the-best-pure-play-web-publication/">smart tabloid</a>, a concept dreamed up by our founder, David Talbot (no matter what others <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/establishments/68506/">would lead you</a> to believe). We still don't aspire to the soporific, self-serious approach to politics and culture of many of our ink-stained, weather-beaten peers, but we also don't shrug it all off the way these younger, snark-bitten upstarts do, either. We're energized and engaged with what's going on in the world -- and we know you are, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/15_years_15_biggest_stories/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/17/15_years_15_biggest_stories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I Remember Nothing&#8221;: Nora Ephron on life, death, hot dogs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/07/nora_ephron_i_remember_nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/07/nora_ephron_i_remember_nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2010/11/07/nora_ephron_i_remember_nothing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The voice that launched a thousand quips is back tackling the writer's toughest assignment: The final chapter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The night before my planned interview with Nora Ephron, I sat before the TV watching our probable new speaker of the House, John Boehner, fawn and burble over his newfound success. Something gnawed, a prickly d&#233;j&#224; vu. It wasn't until the next day, on my way back to the office after talking with Ephron, that I realized I had been thinking about a famous line from Ephron's "Heartburn," which popped up immediately when I went <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=beware+of+men+who+cry&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;aq=t&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;client=firefox-a">searching</a> for it: "Beware of men who cry. It's true that men who cry are sensitive to and in touch with their feelings, but the only feelings they tend to be sensitive to and in touch with are their own."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/07/nora_ephron_i_remember_nothing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/07/nora_ephron_i_remember_nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Introducing: The Year in Sanity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/introduction_to_the_year_in_sanity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/introduction_to_the_year_in_sanity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Year in Sanity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/12/introduction_to_the_year_in_sanity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of the Rally to Restore Sanity, we're celebrating great acts of clear thinking -- and need your help!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Jon Stewart announced the Oct. 30th "<a href="http://www.rallytorestoresanity.com">Rally to Restore Sanity</a>," we cheered. Why didn't we think of that? We put our collective heads together to figure out a way to meaningfully participate and, naturally, we figured we'd spend a small fortune to shuttle legions to the march by bus. But then someone <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/28/sanity-bus-arianna-offers_n_742739.html">beat us to it</a>. Curses!</p><p>So instead, we came up with another idea:&#160;Spotlighting outstanding examples of sane behavior in 2010 so far. We're flipping one of our favorite features &#8211; <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/this_week_in_crazy/index.html">This Week in Crazy</a> &#8211; on its head, running a series that celebrates the Year in Sanity. The goal: We want to honor inspiring cases of clear-thinking in the face of madness. We want to reward honest reactions when evasion would've been applauded. We want to spotlight straight talk, when obfuscation would have been the easier, or expected, way to go.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/introduction_to_the_year_in_sanity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/13/introduction_to_the_year_in_sanity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did dogs teach us to love?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/09/jeffrey_masson_the_dog_who_couldn_t_stop_loving/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/09/jeffrey_masson_the_dog_who_couldn_t_stop_loving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2010/10/09/jeffrey_masson_the_dog_who_couldn_t_stop_loving</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his latest look at animal behavior, Jeffrey Masson suggests a mutually beneficial evolution of our two species]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a Flickr <a href="http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=dog">photo</a> uploaded in the past 10 seconds to a 2,500-year-old Greek urn that shows wispy, wild-tongued creatures frolicking with our ancestors, our devotion to our pets is easy to document.</p><p>Our relationship, though, may go back much further and deeper than we realize. Some scientists believe our relationship with domesticated animals -- dogs, in particular -- goes back as far as 100,000 years. And that speculation has launched a nascent school of study into the theory that man and dog have co-evolved through the centuries in untold ways; one scientist speculates that we lost our own, keen sense of smell by relying on the sharper sniff of our beastly hunting partners.</p><p>In his new <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Dog-Who-Couldnt-Stop-Loving/Jeffrey-Moussaieff-Masson/e/9780062014320/?itm=1&amp;USRI=the+dog+who+couldn%27t+stop+loving">"The Dog Who Couldn't Stop Loving,"</a> Jeffrey Moussaieff Masson considers how a "mutual evolution" not only impacted dogs, but us as well, and our own capacity to love and feel empathy for other creatures. Warmly told through his relationship with his own dog, a joyfully failed guide dog named Benjy, Masson breezes through some of this curious new research while celebrating the seemingly bottomless capacity of dogs to express love and devotion to their owners.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/09/jeffrey_masson_the_dog_who_couldn_t_stop_loving/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/09/jeffrey_masson_the_dog_who_couldn_t_stop_loving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our conflicted relationship with animals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/herzog_some_we_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/herzog_some_we_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noble Beasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/int/2010/09/05/herzog_some_we_love</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do we get so angry with animal abusers, but eat more animals than ever before? An expert provides some clues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our collective animal passion has never seemed greater. Studies show we spend as much on our pets in a recession than when not in one, animal welfare laws continue to strengthen, and acts of animal cruelty caught on film and uploaded to the Web create global furor and condemnation. Animals, their furry forebears would surely say, have never had it so good.</p><p>Or have they? In his fascinating new book, <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Some-We-Love-Some-We-Hate-Some-We-Eat/Hal-Herzog/e/9780062010704/?itm=1&amp;USRI=some+we+love%2c+some+we+hate%2c+some+we+eat">"Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat,"</a> Hal Herzog looks at the wild, tortured paradoxes in our relationship with the weaker, if sometimes more adorable, species. A professor of psychology at Western Carolina University, Herzog studies our complicated relationship with animals, from our devotion to our dogs, to our increasing devotion to that barbecued brisket.</p><p>We spoke to Herzog Friday about his new book, asking him about the notorious "cat bin lady" and "puppy throwing girl," whether children who harm animals grow up to be serial killers, and whether we'll have to come to peace with the undeniable similarities between the animals we love, and those we love to eat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/herzog_some_we_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/05/herzog_some_we_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

