<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Laura Gottesdiener</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/laura_gottesdiener/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gun deaths rampant after Sandy Hook massacre</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown Massacre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers are simply staggering: An average of 18 people have been killed each day since December 14]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> There have been more than 400 guns deaths since the Newtown massacre on December 14, according to a <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/crime/2012/12/gun_death_tally_every_american_gun_death_since_newtown_sandy_hook_shooting.html">new interactive project</a> between <em>Slate.com</em> and the anonymous twitter user @gundeaths.</p><p>The two launched the project because, as <em>Slate</em> writes, there are few real-time chronicles of daily gun deaths in the United States, despite the daily mention of firearms and gun politics in the media since the shooting. In fact, the onslaught of reporting on guns has been so intense, The Huffington Post published an article this morning with the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/douglas-anthony-cooper/bored-of-the-newtown-mass_b_2399602.html">headline “So You’re Bored of the Newtown Massacre?”</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/gun_deaths_rampant_after_sandy_hook_massacre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marijuana smoothie, anyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the drug now legal in Washington and Colorado, blended cannabis could become the health food craze of 2013]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> One of the nation's leading cannabis doctors has an idea for a New Year's diet: a marijuana smoothie. Dr. William Courtney, who has spent years researching the potential health benefits of medical marijuana, argues that juicing whole hemp plants can provide a host of healing properties, ranging from pain relief to even helping prevent diseases like cancer.</p><p>Yet, many of the health benefits are lost, Courtney says, when a patient ingests marijuana in the most typical way: by smoking it. Burning the plant kills off enzymes, which can diminish some of the curative properties. Juicing the entire plant, on the other hand, retains the enzymes and may be more medically beneficial. Plus, smoking the plant kicks the THC--and its psychoactive properties--into high gear, producing marijuana's high, which many find to be a curative effect in its own right, but is not always what the patient desires or wants.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/marijuana_smoothie_anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Caller shamelessly shills for Big Tobacco</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_daily_caller_shamelessly_shills_for_big_tobacco/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_daily_caller_shamelessly_shills_for_big_tobacco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Tobacco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marlboro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their newly minted tobacco critic promises to "educate the public," offering gushing praise of Marlboro Reds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The right-leaning publication The Daily Caller recently launched an <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/23/daily-caller-cigarette-review-1/">outrageous editorial series</a> by author Patrick Howley. "Cigarette Reviews for the Uninitiated: 18 Brands in 18 Weeks" reads like a parody of tobacco industry talking points, or some pundit's idea of an end-of-year joke column. But on close inspection, it appears to be quite real. The expressed purpose of the series is stated clearly: “It is our hope that the research conducted herein by official The D.C. cigarette critic Patrick Howley will inform and educate the public, as well as aid tobacco companies in their forthcoming product designs.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_daily_caller_shamelessly_shills_for_big_tobacco/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_daily_caller_shamelessly_shills_for_big_tobacco/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most racist restaurant in America?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_most_racist_restaurant_in_america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_most_racist_restaurant_in_america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maker's Mark Bourbon House and Lounge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new lawsuit alleges that a Kentucky Maker's Mark Bourbon House and Lounge denied access to African Americans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The Maker’s Mark Bourbon House and Lounge in downtown Louisville, Kentucky, used to be a decently classy place, the type of glass-enclosed, wood-paneled establishment striving for a level of authenticity beyond the reach of a chain restaurant named after a bourbon label.</p><p>Late this past August, however, the Bourbon House and Lounge officially became one of the most despicable restaurants in the country when it denied African Americans access to a public event held at the site.</p><p><a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/12/20/53288.htm">Here’s what happened:</a> Andre Mulligan and his brother went to the Maker’s Mark Bourbon House and Lounge on August 17 to speak with officials from Maker's Mark bourbon company about a public event to be held at their restaurant the next day. At the meeting, Maker's Mark wanted to know “the ratio of ‘black people’ to ‘white people’ attending the event” explains Mulligan in his lawsuit against the establishment.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_most_racist_restaurant_in_america/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_most_racist_restaurant_in_america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One in eight workers will be unemployed next year</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Encouraging as recent jobs reports have been, 2013 promises to be as challenging for America's work force as 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The recent unemployment statistics have been improving--<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-jobless-rate-falls-7-123110106.html">dipping below 8 percent</a>, according to the Department of Labor, for the first time in October and holding steady below that threshold ever since.</p><p>Yet, these numbers never tell the full story, and another measure of joblessness shows an unsettling trend: sporadic unemployment for millions of the nation’s workforce.</p><p>In 2011, nearly <a href="http://stateofworkingamerica.org/">15 percent of the workforce</a> was unemployed at some point throughout the year—a stark contrast to the official 2011 annual unemployment rate of 8.9 percent. The difference? The over-the-year unemployment rate takes into account the fact that many workers will be unemployed one month and then reemployed the next, while the average annual unemployment rate simply averages the amount of the labor force unemployed that very month. This means that the official annual rate obscures the unsettlingly high amount of job instability in the United States—a trend that is projected to continue into 2013.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/one_in_eight_workers_will_be_unemployed_next_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 absurd ways the military wastes taxpayer dollars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought the Petraeus scandal was embarrassing, wait 'til you hear how much is spent on military golf courses]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The David Petraeus scandal has shined a light on the luxurious, subsidized lifestyle of the U.S. military's top generals. But so far, what the media has uncovered only scratches the surface of the abuses. Here are seven absurd ways the military wastes our money -- and none of them have anything to do with national defense.</p><p align="LEFT"><strong>1. A whole battalion of generals?</strong> The titles “general” or “admiral” sound like they belong to pretty exclusive posts, fit only for the best of the best. This flashy title makes it pretty easy to say, "so what if a few of our military geniuses get the royal treatment -- particularly if they are the sole commanders of the most powerful military in human history." The reality, however, is that there are  nearly<em> 1,000</em> generals and admirals in the U.S. armed forces, and each has an entourage that would make a Hollywood star jealous.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/7_absurd_ways_the_military_wastes_taxpayer_dollars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4 reasons &#8220;2016&#8243; was &#8220;snubbed&#8221; an Oscar nod</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/4_reasons_2016_was_snubbed_an_oscar_nod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/4_reasons_2016_was_snubbed_an_oscar_nod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dinesh D'Souza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dinesh D'Souza chalks it up to liberal bias. Perhaps he's unfamiliar with Rotten Tomatoes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Gerald Molan, the director of the extremely anti-Obama movie, <em>2016: Obama’s America </em>, is mad that his and Dinesh D'Souza’s film wasn’t on the shortlist of documentaries nominated for an Academy Award.</p><p>"The action confirms my opinion that the bias against anything from a conservative point of view is dead on arrival in Hollywood circles,” <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/2016-oscar-snub-has-filmmakers-397855">he complained </a> to the Hollywood Reporter.</p><p>That’s one explanation for its omission--but here are four far more likely reasons that the propaganda film wasn’t nominated.</p><p><strong>1. The film is full of lies</strong></p><p>Following the film’s profitable release, the White House responded to a number of the film’s inaccuracies, from its false assertions about what Obama believes to historical claims that even a simple Google search prove are false. One of the film’s most obvious lies include that Obama signed the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) legislation. It was actually former President George W. Bush who signed the program into law in 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/4_reasons_2016_was_snubbed_an_oscar_nod/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/4_reasons_2016_was_snubbed_an_oscar_nod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>7 disturbing trends in junk food advertising for children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute of Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonalds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bribing kids with toys and convincing them to eat a “fourth meal" are just a couple of the industry's tricks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Ever wonder why one-third of all children in the United States are overweight, if not dangerously obese? According to a slew of recent reports, the cornucopia of junk food advertising to children plays a substantial role in creating this public health crisis. From bribing children with toys and sweepstakes to convincing them to eat a “fourth meal,” the industry is glutted with examples of perverse, profit-chasing schemes to capitalize on children’s appetites at the expense of their long-term health. Here are 7 most perverse trends in junk food advertising to children.</p><p><strong>1. Bombarded!</strong></p><p>Junk food marketing to children and adolescents has become billion-dollar industry. According to 2006 data, the most recent numbers available, kids experience at least $1.6 billion worth of food advertising a year--the vast majority of the ads geared toward pushing high-calorie and low-nutrition snacks down kids’ throat.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/7_disturbing_trends_in_junk_food_advertising_for_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small business owner fires workers after Mitt loses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/small_business_owner_fires_workers_after_mitt_loses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/small_business_owner_fires_workers_after_mitt_loses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Owner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13067239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After failing to coerce his employees with anti-Obama civics courses, a Las Vegas proprietor lashes out]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> In Vegas, one small business owner decided to lash out against his own employees after President Obama was elected, firing 22 of his 114 workers yesterday.</p><p>The owner, who refused to disclose his name or company information, told a local radio station that in the lead-up to the election he did his best to “educate” his employees about the “consequences” of Obama’s reelection. But when the sitting president won despite the owner’s skewed civics lessons, he preemptively fired nearly a fifth of his staff.</p><p>“I explained to them a month ago that if Obama gets in office that the regulations for Obamacare are gonna hurt our business, and I’m gonna have to make provisions to make sure I have enough money to cover the payroll taxes, the additional healthcare I’m gonna have to do, and I explained that to them and I said you do what you feel like in your heart you need to do, but I’m just letting you know as a warning this is things I have to think of as a business owner,” <a href="http://lasvegas.cbslocal.com/2012/11/07/vegas-employer-obama-won-so-i-fired-22-employees/">he told radio host Kevin Wall </a>on 100.5 KXNT.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/small_business_owner_fires_workers_after_mitt_loses/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/small_business_owner_fires_workers_after_mitt_loses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Sandy, thousands left to freeze in public housing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/after_sandy_thousands_left_to_freeze_in_public_housing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/after_sandy_thousands_left_to_freeze_in_public_housing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Daily News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13067222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As winter approaches, city housing authorities in the Northeast scramble to fix damaged or faulty infrastructure ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Between Hurricane Sandy and the below-freezing temperatures, tens of thousands of public housing residents across the Northeast have been left to freeze, as state housing authorities scramble to repair damaged or faulty infrastructure.</p><p>In New York City, more than 20,000 residents across 114 buildings are still living without electricity, heat and, in some cases, even running water since last week’s Hurricane Sandy devastated coastal areas of New York and New Jersey.</p><p>“The level of dysfunction and apathy from NYCHA to the tenants of NYCHA is shocking,” Brooklyn City Councilman Stephen Levin told <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/living-hell-nycha-houses-article-1.1197748">the New York Daily News</a>. “I can’t get an answer for the last three and a half hours. I get responses like, ‘We’re trying.’”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/after_sandy_thousands_left_to_freeze_in_public_housing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/after_sandy_thousands_left_to_freeze_in_public_housing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Elizabeth Warren kill the Tea Party?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/did_elizabeth_warren_kill_the_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/did_elizabeth_warren_kill_the_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13066196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her victory proved that Democrats can stick to their core values and still win over Independents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Yesterday, Massachusetts voters flocked to the polls to cast their ballots for Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren, and today the state is celebrating once again being a beacon of liberalism.</p><p>Warren, who beat out the incumbent Republican Scott Brown in a bitter election, ran a campaign centered on connecting the dots between economic policies and personal values. A Harvard bankruptcy-law professor, Warren trumpeted a platform that called for economic reform, financial regulation and the protection of Social Security, Medicare and other safety-net programs.</p><p>"We said this election is about whose side you're on," Warren told The Huffington Post . "I think of this as an election where we stuck to our values: Make sure Social Security and Medicare benefits are protected, and millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share. To me, that's the heart of it. That's really where the basic social contract is reaffirmed.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/did_elizabeth_warren_kill_the_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/08/did_elizabeth_warren_kill_the_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Most Republicans believe in demonic possession</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonic Possession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witchcraft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, less than half think humans are responsible for climate change]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Less than one week away from the election, a terrifying new poll reveals that more than two-thirds of registered Republican voters believe that people can be possessed by demons.</p><p>A staggering <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/31/scary-poll-shows-that-nearly-six-in-ten-of-voters-believe-in-demonic-possession/">68 percent of registered Republican voters</a> stated that they believe demonic possession is real. Meanwhile, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2012/10/16/study_shows_that_more_republicans_believe_global_warming_is_real_than_in.html">only 48 percent of self-identified Republicans believe </a>in another equally if not more scary natural phenomenon: climate change.</p><p>The poll was conducted by Public Policy Polling, touted by NPR as “one of the most prolific polling outfits in the country.”</p><p>The survey was filled with enlightening gems about how the supernatural world may affect the upcoming presidential race. Women were slightly more likely than men to believe in demonic possession, although this gender gap is not nearly as wide as that of women’s preference for Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/poll_most_republicans_believe_in_demonic_possession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ann: Mormon missions are just like military service!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/20/ann_mormon_missions_are_just_like_military_service/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/20/ann_mormon_missions_are_just_like_military_service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Mormon Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her sons didn't serve, but they did spend a two-year tour proselytizing. For Ann, that's pretty much the same thing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Thursday morning, Mitt ducked a scheduled performance on The View (more on that later), leaving his wife Ann Romney to represent the candidate’s views on those pesky “women’s issues” like abortion rights and military service.</p><p>Her answer on the latter question is turning some heads.</p><p>When pressed by Whoopi Goldberg on how Romney would explain why neither he nor any of his five sons served, Ann explained that the six men found “different ways of serving” by going on their Mormon religious missions.</p><p>“So, you know, we find different ways of serving,” she said. “And my husband and my five boys did serve missions, [but they] did not serve in the military.”</p><p>The substitution, she went on to explain, makes sense because the two share essential, character-building and altruistic values.</p><p>“I sent them away boys and they came back men. And what the difference was -- and I think this where military service is so extraordinary too -- is where you literally do something where you’re helping someone else. You’re going outside of yourself and you’re working and helping others. And that changes you,” she said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/20/ann_mormon_missions_are_just_like_military_service/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/20/ann_mormon_missions_are_just_like_military_service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>223</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives&#8217; &#8220;Obama phone&#8221; flip-out</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/conservatives_obama_phone_flip_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/conservatives_obama_phone_flip_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Video of a woman pledging support to Obama for the free phone he gave her goes viral, and the right goes berserk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Romney’s dwindling army of right-wingers have their hunting vests in a bunch over a new viral video posted on the Drudge Report Thursday afternoon. The minute-long video, which has already gotten more than one million views since it was posted yesterday on YouTube, shows an African American woman in Cleveland voicing her support for President Obama because he gave her a “free phone.” As for her appearance, suffice it to say that she comes across as the living incarnation of the right wing’s stereotypical welfare citizen--which, according to Romney, is now a full 47 percent of the population.</p><p>Naturally, the right went rabid.</p><p>The Steve Malzberg show, hosted by the notoriously right-wing radio personality, quickly tweeted the video with the comment, “Obama voter. G-d help us.”</p><p>Rush Limbaugh’s comments were even more scathing--sprinkled with accusations that the woman lacked basic education except for one topic: how to game the system.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/conservatives_obama_phone_flip_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/conservatives_obama_phone_flip_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nine terrifying facts about America&#8217;s biggest police force</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NYPD has expanded into a massive global anti-terror operation with military capabilities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The NYPD is the biggest police force in the country, with over <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/faq/faq_police.shtml">34,000 uniformed officers</a> patrolling New York's streets, and 51,000 employees overall -- more than the FBI. It has a proposed budget of $4.6 billion for 2013, a figure that represents almost 15 percent of the <a href="http://www.council.nyc.gov/html/budget/PDFs/2013/056%20Police%20Department.pdf">entire city’s budget.</a></p><p>NYC's population is a little over 8 million. That means that there are 4.18 police officers per 1,000 people. By comparison, Los Angeles, the second largest city in the U.S. with 3.8 million people, has only 9,895 officers--a ratio of 2.6 police <a href="http://www.lapdonline.org/march_2009/news_view/41030">per 1,000 people.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/nine_terrifying_facts_about_americas_biggest_police_force/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feminism&#8217;s next big step</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/feminisms_next_big_step/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/feminisms_next_big_step/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12990198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking the glass ceiling was nice, but women must now find their own definition of success ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend, as I was sorting my clothes to give some away, a navy blue J. Crew suit buried in the back of my closet threw me into an existential crisis. Rationally speaking, I knew there was about as much likelihood of me wearing that suit as Paul Ryan suddenly donning my Stop Stop-and-Frisk pin. As a freelance writer focusing on social justice movements, my daily wardrobe includes only four items: jeans, underwear and a T-shirt for the days I leave the house, and my pajamas for the days I sequester myself and my coffee maker in the closet to write.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> On the other hand, the suit was more than an outfit; it was a three-piece metaphor for a high-powered career path. To discard it meant coming to terms with never being the first female president of the United States, never click-clacking up the corporate or government ladder to make my crack in patriarchy’s glass ceiling.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/feminisms_next_big_step/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/23/feminisms_next_big_step/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>