<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Laura McClure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/writer/laura_mcclure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 01:08:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Partisan is as partisan does</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/02/26/moveon_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/02/26/moveon_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2004/02/26/moveon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One month after CBS refused to run the ad that won MoveOn.org&#8217;s Bush in 30 Seconds contest, the advocacy group wants the Justice Department to investigate why CBS has agreed to air an ad that promotes a White House-backed Medicare prescription drug law. While not blatantly partisan, the ad blurs the line between public service [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> One month after CBS <a href="/news/feature/2004/01/16/moveon/">refused to run</a> the ad that won MoveOn.org's Bush in 30 Seconds contest, the advocacy group wants the Justice Department to investigate why CBS has <a href="/politics/war_room/2004/02/19/cbs/index.html">agreed to air</a> an ad that promotes a White House-backed Medicare prescription drug law. While not blatantly partisan, the ad blurs the line between public service announcement and Republican campaign plug so much that CBS initially refused to run the spot. </p><p> MoveOn officials fume that CBS has since bowed to White House pressure and violated the network's own stated policies by agreeing to air the commercial. If CBS is indeed out of line, why is MoveOn going to the Justice Department and not the FCC? Eli Pariser, campaign director for MoveOn Voters Fund, tells Salon: "The critical distinction is that we believe this to be more than a regulatory matter. This may be a violation of federal law." </p><p> CBS officials did not return calls seeking comment. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/02/26/moveon_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/02/26/moveon_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A wedding, a revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/02/15/wedding_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/02/15/wedding_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/02/14/wedding</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In San Francisco, one bride wore white and the other  wore blue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Salon <a href="/mwt/feature/2003/10/20/same_sex_marriage/index.html">profiled</a> Toby and Jean Adams last fall, they had just been married by a minister in the San Francisco Bay Area. It was a small, quiet revolution: They went home to small-town Auburn, Calif., and began the process living life openly as a married same-sex couple in a community where traditional heartland values are still taken for granted. Daring -- and remarkable -- as that was, neither bride expected that by Valentine's Day 2004 they would be <i>legally</i> married, with their union not only blessed by a minister but sanctioned by the courts too. </p><p>On Friday, they drove almost three hours in the early morning from Auburn to San Francisco, found a public bathroom, put on their wedding dresses for a second time, and became the 66th couple to make history that morning at the city's elegant City Hall. One day after newly elected San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom defied California law by ordering the county clerk to accept marriage license applications from gay and lesbian couples, Toby and Jean are among the first legally married same-sex couples in the nation. </p><p>For now, anyway. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/02/15/wedding_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/02/15/wedding_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Same-sex family values</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/20/same_sex_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/20/same_sex_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2003 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2003/10/20/same_sex_marriage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toby and Jean Adams moved to Auburn, Calif., to raise their daughter in a close-knit community with good schools. The reaction of their neighbors and fellow churchgoers -- from anger to acceptance to  confusion -- mirrors Middle America's evolving attitudes toward  gays and gay marriage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>St. Luke's Episcopal is a small red-brick church that stands shaded at the corner of two tree-lined streets, not far from the main square of Auburn, Calif. In a town of many churches it is the second-oldest one, and its congregation, like the town, is almost entirely conservative and white. In St. Luke's, an American flag hangs over the pulpit, and nearly every Sunday of late there are family members in Iraq to pray for listed in the bulletin. At service, there are men who lean heavily on their canes when the congregation is called to stand, and white-haired women nearby whose help the men refuse. After the sermon they all give thanks for the blessings in their lives, and sing. </p><p>One recent Sunday, newlyweds Jean and Toby Adams walked to the altar and held hands. The women had been married two weeks before, but not many in the congregation knew that yet. This was Jean's first time in Toby's church, and because she had grown up in a similar congregation in small-town California she was cold with sweat on her way to the altar. The 10 or 12 steps to the front of the church seemed long to her, but when they arrived and turned to face the congregation, Toby was clear voiced and calm. "I would like to give thanks for our marriage," said Toby, and stopped. There was a pause as the senior warden hurried over to them, turned to the congregation, and took Jean's free hand. "Let us give thanks for how open our church is," he said. Only one couple left the church as a result. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/10/20/same_sex_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/10/20/same_sex_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;They can dish it out, but they can&#8217;t take it&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/27/franken_12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/27/franken_12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2003 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garrison Keillor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/08/27/franken</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Franken talks about his big victory over the Fox News bullies, why Bush can be thrown out in 2004, and comedy as a political weapon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Franken got the glad tidings while vacationing in Italy. He had fallen asleep reading "The Tipping Point" and mulling marketing ideas for his forthcoming "Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right," when a friend staying in the villa walked into his bedroom and woke him up. "Al!" he said. "You're being sued by Fox!" After a second-and-a-half of considering this, Franken responded: "Good!" Then he fell back asleep. </p><p>If Fox's intention was to break a large, undercooked ostrich egg on its corporate face while pouring streams of golden ducats into Franken's pockets, it carried out its plan to perfection. As everyone who pays attention to such matters knows by now, a judge laughed its trademark-infringement lawsuit (Fox claimed it trademarked the phrase "fair and balanced") out of court -- even adding insult to injury by warning the right-wing media behemoth that its ownership of the phrase it claimed to have spent $61 million developing was extremely dubious. And sales of Franken's book soared sky-high on the publicity, hitting #1 on Amazon's list Thursday. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/08/27/franken_12/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/27/franken_12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;unconscionable&#8221; death of Mazen Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/21/photographer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/21/photographer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2003 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frontline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/08/20/photographer</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are journalists being targeted in Middle East war zones? To a colleague of the slain Reuters cameraman, it sure seems that way.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On Aug. 17, Palestinian cameraman Mazen Dana became the second Reuters journalist to be killed by U.S. soldiers since the start of the Iraq war in March. Dana, who had been filming outside a U.S.-controlled prison in Baghdad following the death of six Iraqis the previous day, was fatally shot through the chest when an American tank crew mistook his camera for a rocket-propelled grenade launcher and opened fire. The American military has called the incident "a terrible mistake" and promised to investigate, but some observers now speculate that the shooting was reckless, at best. </p><p> "From the eyewitness accounts, it appears that Dana was fired on without warning," wrote the Committee to Protect Journalists in an open letter to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. "He was filming in an area where no hostilities were taking place, raising questions about whether U.S. troops acted recklessly in targeting him." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/08/21/photographer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/08/21/photographer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Liberia waiting game</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/25/liberia_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/25/liberia_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/25/liberia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can the Bush administration bring itself to commit U.S. troops in Africa on purely humanitarian grounds?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday, bereft Liberians deposited 18 corpses in front of the U.S. embassy in Monrovia -- the bodies of loved ones caught in the crossfire of Liberia's civil war. The protest aimed to dramatize the cost of the Bush administration's weeks of wavering on whether to send in troops to quell the latest round of fighting. </p><p>Although President Bush has promised to come to Liberia's aid once the conditions of a regional peace agreement are met, the United Nations has called upon the United States to send in a small peacekeeping force now. In the meantime, 4,500 U.S. troops are waiting for orders off the Liberian coast. </p><p>"What more do you need to see?" one protester screamed into a CNN camera on Monday. So far the American answer remains "More than this." </p><p>If the United States regularly and consistently intervened around the globe anytime innocents were being slaughtered, the Marines would already be in Liberia. But there are <a target="new" href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/04/congo/index.html">deadlier wars</a> in Africa clamoring for humanitarian intervention. And despite the idealistic rhetoric offered to justify the U.S. invasion of Iraq, both the Bush administration and foreign policy circles are at best divided on whether the United States should ever commit its troops for humanitarian reasons alone. With American forces already stretched thin by Iraq and Afghanistan, some experts question the wisdom of sending additional troops to a nation that presents no immediate security risk. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/07/25/liberia_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/25/liberia_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desperate for a U.S. invasion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/23/liberia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/23/liberia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/23/liberia</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hidden in a candlelit basement in Monrovia, a Liberian aid worker waits for President Bush to stop the chaos and death overtaking his country.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> After a rocket hit a residential complex in the capital of Liberia Monday, mourners brought the mutilated bodies of their dead to the U.S. Embassy and laid them outside the locked gates. It was an act of desperation, a grim cry for help on the part of a people plagued by 13 years of civil war -- a war that appears unlikely to end without international assistance. Although President Charles Taylor promised to step down in a recent peace deal brokered by other countries in the region, he has refused to leave until peacemakers arrive to control the rebel fighting. </p><p>Liberia was founded by former United States slaves, and 150 years later, the U.S. is the obvious choice for peacemaker. But while several thousand U.S. troops are moving into position for that role, President George W. Bush has yet to decide if they will be sent in. In the meantime, Liberians continue to die and world pressure builds on Bush to intervene. </p><p>On Tuesday night, Salon spoke to Samuel Boniface Nah, a Liberian stationed in Monrovia with the humanitarian aid agency Mercy Corps. He had taken refuge in a house near the agency's offices; hidden in a basement where candles provided the only light, Nah spoke to Salon by cellphone. Here is his description of the past few days: </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/07/23/liberia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/23/liberia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anyone but Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/19/gitlin_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/19/gitlin_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2003 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoveOn.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/07/19/gitlin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Veteran activist Todd Gitlin speaks out about MoveOn, ANSWER, the Greens -- and how progressives need to emulate the self-discipline of the right to win in 2004.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They weren't supposed to be activists, the college students of 1963. After years of Eisenhower comfort and prosperity, they weren't supposed to have anything to be active about. The class of '63 "was on the trailing edge of what was called the silent generation," writes leading '60s activist Todd Gitlin in his latest book, "Letters to a Young Activist." "The stereotype -- we were timid, gray flannel-suited -- was more right than wrong." </p><p>So when the broadly popular Vietnam War broke out in earnest in 1964, the force of the statements made against it by radical student groups came as a shock -- and to many people, suggested a shocking amount of hubris. At the end of 1965, one in three Americans thought students against the war had no right to demonstrate. At Kent State University in Ohio the same year, demonstrators were met by a crowd with rocks, not cheers. And although the anti-Vietnam War movement looms large in the way we imagine the 1960s now, "it wasn't, in that imprecise and evasive clich&eacute;, an expression of the times," according to Gitlin. "The times were profoundly polarized." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/07/19/gitlin_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/19/gitlin_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions die, Bush is silent</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/04/congo_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/04/congo_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2003 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/07/04/congo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Congo's descent into a vortex of murder and destruction is the globe's worst human crisis. But as he travels in Africa this week, the president will ignore it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salvatore Bulamuzi lost five children in Bunia while the United States was liberating Iraq, and it did not make the news. He lost his parents as well -- all killed in the Congolese war, where tribal militias fight for land rich in timber and diamonds, and Dantesque horrors of macheted infants, murderous 14-year-olds and HIV-laced rapes are so common as to be unremarkable. </p><p>In that context, Bulamuzi's story is not remarkable, either. News reports and interviews with those who live in the Congo or have recently left suggest that he is but one person adrift on a sea of madness. In the eastern part of Congo there is a town run by children, an uncontrollable army playing soldiers with Kalashnikovs. In the city of Bunia, men machete men, and underground there are diamonds and bones. At night the women hide in the forest because it is safer than in their homes, but they desperately hush their infants lest the noise bring looters who rape and sometimes kill. </p><p>"I am convinced now ... that the lives of Congolese people no longer mean anything to anybody," Bulamuzi told an <a target="new" href="http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGAFR620102003?open&of=ENG-COD">Amnesty International</a> representative at the start of the Iraqi war. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/07/04/congo_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/07/04/congo_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Bush be toppled?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/13/bush_three/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/13/bush_three/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Walsh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/06/13/bush_three</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 3 of our series, Tom Hayden, Paul Berman and Ross Mirkarimi say yes -- but they disagree about whether the Green Party should be accommodated or destroyed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Tom Hayden, author, activist and former California state senator </b> </p><p> The Bush campaign is spinning his invulnerability myth. In fact he fears it will be a close race. The "liberation" of Iraq is turning into an occupation. As of June 6, 79 Americans had been killed in Iraq and Saudi Arabia since the statue of Saddam was pulled down in Baghdad -- almost as many Americans have died in peacetime as in war. On the homefront, there is no escape from budget crisis, unemployment, environmental rollbacks and fights over stacking the judiciary. If Bush wins the same percentage of votes in 2004 as he did in 2000, he would lose by 3 million votes, largely due to the increase in Latino voters. </p><p> Presidential elections are decided on character, theme, national security and the economy. Democrats will have to tie Bush on character, improve on theme, defend on national security and emphasize the economy. But Democrats can't expect the economy to eclipse the national security issue. Nor can they be credible sounding equally warlike with Bush. And they can't expect a national election to be determined by a narrow economic issue like prescription drugs for the elderly. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/13/bush_three/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/13/bush_three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Bush be toppled?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/12/bush_two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/12/bush_two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Walsh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/06/12/bush_two</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Part 2 of our series, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway and author Steven Brill say yes -- but Brown insists the media's been "pimped."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown</b> </p><p> Is Bush beatable? Sure. The pollsters who are saying national security is all that matters are wrong. By the time the election rolls around, the issue of jobs, whether or not you're able to pay your mortgage and send your kids to college, whether you have health coverage -- they're gonna be paramount. But you don't have any Democrat who has nerve enough to take Bush on and take him on consistently. Every Sunday talk show should have a Democrat forcibly taking Bush to task on all the lies -- the weapons of mass destruction, tax cuts -- whatever the lies are. They have to take him on in a dramatic fashion -- the way Bill Clinton would have. I mean, in 1992 we were in a time of great pleasure surrounding the defeat of Saddam the first time, by the first President Bush. But Mr. Clinton was able to defeat him. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/12/bush_two/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/12/bush_two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Bush be toppled?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/11/bush_260/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/11/bush_260/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Walsh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/06/11/bush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Yes, but ..." says a Salon panel of political fortunetellers including Robert Dallek, John Fund, Sherman Alexie, Donna Brazile and Pat Caddell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> He's riding high in Aqaba, forcing Ariel Sharon and Mahmoud Abbas to talk peace in the Middle East. He's Top Gun on the flight deck of the USS Lincoln, triumphantly greeting the troops to declare war with Iraq over, looking manly in his flight suit. He's pushed two gargantuan tax cuts through Congress, and his approval ratings remain sky high. True, in some 2004 election polls he's only a few points ahead of an "unnamed Democrat" -- but he trounces any of the Democrats currently running for president by at least 10 points. </p><p> Can George W. Bush be beaten in 2004? Every one of the dozen experts Salon asked that question answered a resounding "Yes, but ..." There's consensus that the economy will matter more than Republicans want to believe, that Bush is vulnerable as long as Iraq remains unstable, that the growing controversy over the missing WMDs might finally hurt him with voters, that Americans would rather have Social Security and public education stabilized than a tax cut for the wealthy -- but the Democrats haven't found the message or messenger yet to make a persuasive case. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/06/11/bush_260/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/06/11/bush_260/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the Bush tax cut could have bought</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/29/tax_cuts_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/29/tax_cuts_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/05/29/tax_cuts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That $330 billion could have covered every uninsured child in the country and paid for millions of teachers and child-care workers. Instead it's going to the richest Americans.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been a trying week for those with math anxiety, not to mention anyone who, owing either to their fear of numbers or their lack of millions of dollars of disposable income, may be struggling to understand the impact of the tax-cut bill that President Bush signed into law Wednesday. White House press secretary Ari Fleischer, for instance, said the new measure, which includes $330 billion in tax breaks over the next 10 years, would create "more than a million jobs." Many economists dispute Fleischer's analysis, but even if it turned out to be true, given the overall job loss during Bush's administration -- 2.7 million jobs in the private sector alone -- it would still leave us in the red, job-wise. </p><p>In fact, it is in the red where the really impressive numbers reside. The day before the East Room signing ceremony, in a move unembellished by ceremony, Bush signed a bill that allows the federal government to borrow up to $7.4 trillion -- a $984 billion increase in the federal debt limit -- to cover the tab for the tax cuts. This year's deficit, after surpluses during the last four years of the Clinton administration, already is expected to exceed a whopping $300 billion. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/05/29/tax_cuts_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/29/tax_cuts_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No &#8220;heroines,&#8221; owls, birthdays or pumpkins &#8212; they might offend somebody</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/17/ravitch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/17/ravitch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2003 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Potter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language Police]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2003/05/16/ravitch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In her new bestseller "The Language Police," historian Diane Ravitch rips into the p.c. cops who are ruining America's textbooks in the name of "sensitivity."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fairy tale world of educational publishing, there are no heroines. </p><p>No blizzards, rats or owls, either. </p><p>That's because these words -- along with over 500 others -- have been banned under the mandatory bias guidelines that must be followed by publishers of children's textbooks and tests. </p><p>According to these guidelines, heroines are sexist, blizzards demonstrate regional prejudice, rats are too scary and owls are culturally insensitive because they're associated with death in some cultures. </p><p>Pressure groups from the far left and right have hijacked children's education, claims educational historian Diane Ravitch, and replaced it with adult politics. What's worse, she says, most parents have no idea this is happening. In her damning new book, "The Language Police," Ravitch, who was an assistant secretary in the Department of Education under former President Bush and served on a board overseeing the development of national tests in the Clinton administration, outlines the byzantine approval process publishers must go through in order not to offend any pressure group, no matter how small. She says that the results of these guidelines are bloodless history textbooks that border on inaccuracy and bowdlerized literature devoid of controversial language or topics. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/05/17/ravitch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/05/17/ravitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dodging the war issue, again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/14/kerry_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/14/kerry_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2003 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John F. Kerry, D-Mass.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/03/14/kerry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry blistered 
the Bush administration in a speech Thursday -- but like many Democrats, he shied away from Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With Democratic presidential candidates under fire for their reluctance to speak out about Iraq, Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry delivered a major policy address in San Francisco Thursday -- and omitted any substantive mention of the looming war. </p><p>In a 40-minute speech to a packed hall sponsored by the Commonwealth Club of California, Kerry offered a stinging indictment of Bush domestic policies on the environment, homeland security, eroding civil liberties and the declining economy. But he saved his comments on the war for a question-and-answer session afterward, and even in those tempered remarks, his position on Iraq was less than clear-cut. </p><p>The ongoing failure of the Bush administration to win allies in the U.N. Security Council "displays some of the weakest diplomacy we've ever seen in the history of the continental U.S.," Kerry said after the speech. </p><p>Although he voted last fall to authorize the president to use military force against Iraq and said Thursday that he did not regret his vote, Kerry did not say whether he still believes force should be used -- or if so, when. "The United States should never go to war because it wants to go to war," he said, echoing statements made in January. "We should go to war because we have to go to war. And that is not clear at this time." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/14/kerry_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/14/kerry_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coalition of the billing &#8212; or unwilling?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/12/foreign_aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/12/foreign_aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2003 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/03/12/foreign_aid</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration is lavishing billions of dollars on potential allies at the U.N. Strangely, it isn't working. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The international airport at Conakry, Guinea, is busier than usual this week, as diplomats from France, the U.S. and Britain continue to descend upon the West African capital for more discreet horse-trading in preparation for the expected United Nations vote on the Iraq resolution. Although Guinea has close financial ties to France and polls show that its Muslim population strongly opposes an Iraq invasion, the developing nation could gain $21.4 million in U.S. foreign aid this year in exchange for a vote in favor of the pending resolution. </p><p>Wooed by such a wealthy suitor, Guinea may not be able to afford ideology. </p><p>Such are the naked politics of checkbook diplomacy, currently on gaudy display as the Bush administration tries to pull from among the 15 members of the U.N. Security Council the nine votes required to authorize an invasion. In the tug-of-war over the six undecided countries that will determine the final outcome, the U.S. is brandishing its wallet as a weapon. Guinea, Mexico, Chile, Angola, Cameroon and Pakistan all face the same dilemma this week: Ignore mounting opposition to war at home, or face the wrath of Washington? </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/12/foreign_aid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/12/foreign_aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Salon interview: Stanley Crouch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/05/crouch_8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/05/crouch_8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2003 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/03/05/crouch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The career provocateur says an Iraq attack could provoke Saddam to use nuclear weapons and trigger more  terror  -- but won't say whether he's for or against the war.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In two decades as a columnist and critic for the Village Voice, New York Daily News, the New Republic and (briefly) Salon, Stanley Crouch has roasted nearly every sacred cow of political correctness -- but his specialty is skewering simple-minded racial politics. He's called Afrocentrism "another simple-minded hustle" and says Pan-Africanism is "tantamount to light insanity." Rap, he proclaims, is "'The Birth of a Nation' with a backbeat." </p><p> Although he bristles at being labeled conservative, his idiosyncratic politics fall several yards to the right of the black nationalism he embraced in his youth in California. Raised in L.A., he taught theater at nearby Pomona College at the zenith of student activism before rejecting black separatism as narrow and nihilistic and trading it in for the more inclusive New York jazz scene of the mid-1970s. Democracy is a jazz band, he once wrote, the fusion and interplay of individual identity and community. Along with Ralph Ellison and Albert Murray, he's introduced maverick -- and always controversial -- ways of thinking about race, culture and politics to an American audience that likes its ideas about such topics simple. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/03/05/crouch_8/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/03/05/crouch_8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Salon Interview: Molly Ivins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/18/ivins_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/18/ivins_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2003 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2003/02/18/ivins</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Op-Ed populist says her fellow Texan, the man from Midland, is in over his head as he rushes to war with Iraq.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syndicated columnist Molly Ivins is the rarest of political animals: a smart liberal who can make you laugh. She shares Texas roots with the president she nicknamed "Shrub," and her bestselling book, "Shrub: The Short but Happy Political Life of George W. Bush," coauthored by Lou Dubose, was remarkable for treating its subject with genuine warmth -- even as it skewered him. </p><p>Ivins and the president also share a populist touch. Her four books all spent time on the New York Times bestseller list, and her well-read column clearly is not written for her Op-Ed colleagues but for the rest of us. In a conversation with Salon, Ivins says Texans are as concerned about war with Iraq as anyone else, and she frets that the president who called Africa a country has not been able to convince the world that he knows what he's doing in the Middle East. </p><p> <b> All indications are that we're heading into a war with Iraq whether the American public wants one or not. What do you make of the current situation? </b> </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/02/18/ivins_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/18/ivins_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mario Cuomo: Three questions on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/11/cuomo_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/11/cuomo_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle East]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/02/10/cuomo</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former New York governor argues that Saddam must go -- but now is not the time for war.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When New York's Mario Cuomo delivered the keynote address to the 1984 Democratic National Convention in San Francisco, he spoke powerfully about the need for caution in U.S. foreign policy. "No martial music will be able to muffle the sound of the truth," he said. "Peace is better than war because life is better than death." At the height of Reaganism and the Cold War, he called on the Democratic Party to save the nation from the fear of a nuclear holocaust, to go back to the root of social values. </p><p>The Democrats listened, almost reverently. </p><p>Back in those days, Cuomo was a moral center of gravity in the Democratic Party. The son of Italian immigrants, he was the first Italian-American governor of New York. He was the longest-serving Democratic governor in the state's modern history. He was a clear front-runner for the party's presidential nomination in 1988, but after a period of highly public indecision, he bowed out. </p><p>He had captured the party's imagination as a thoughtful and passionate speaker, an eloquent intellectual, and someone very sure of himself. In a telephone interview with Salon last week, those traits were still very much in evidence in the 70-year-old former governor. So, too, were his values. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/02/11/cuomo_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/02/11/cuomo_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The INS runaround</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/23/registration_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/23/registration_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2003/01/23/registration</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The immigration service's new registration plan is supposed to help fight terrorism. It's also locking people up without explanation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the office computer at the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) crashed during Mohsen Hashemi's interview on the afternoon of Dec. 16, 2002 -- two days after he'd first heard of a new program that, he thought, required him to register with the agency -- he was annoyed but unconcerned. He'd been a taxpaying Texan for the past 10 years, and he was not afraid to register. He was here legally, on "humanitarian parole" from Iran, and contributing to his community. The Italian restaurant he owned in Round Rock was small but surviving, and his daughters, 2 1/2 and 5, had been learning to speak Southern from birth. His wife, a Russian immigrant, had started studying for the U.S. citizenship exam that year. It was a good life, he thought, and he was grateful to the government who had allowed him to escape harm in Iran. </p><p>So when the INS told him it had grown close to closing time that day and he would have to come back on Dec. 19, he didn't mind. He minded a little more when the computer connection to D.C. went down on that second visit too and he was again told to make the hour-and-a-half drive to return. For a routine process, this was taking a long time, he thought, but he willingly complied. And although on his third visit the computer did not crash, everything else in his world did. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2003/01/23/registration_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2003/01/23/registration_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
